Remember your government has released Pfizer from any liability for their product if it happens to harm you (and it has, unless you are believing mainstream spin). Listen to this woman whose experience proved you’re on your own if things go wrong. EWR
Posted on NZ MOH site, June 3 2021
Taken from a transcript of a webinar by a MOH Covid Committee, who hold fortnightly webinars for health professionals.
Do health professionals appreciate the implications for this statement made by the facilitator, I wonder?
The facilitator states…
‘There were a couple of questions at the last meeting that came through so I’m just going to run those off quickly.
The first was around funding to support primary care when people are presenting to them with side effects following their vaccination.
There is no specific funding available to cover that and no specific funding to cover the submission of an adverse event into CARM so there isn’t any funding to cover that.
I’m going to touch base, I spoke to the post-event team leader today just to follow up with him and he’s organising for me the contacts at ACC so we can understand what is the threshold at which we can make a claim through ACC that this is a treatment injury.
I haven’t seen those yet, but we will follow that up and see where it takes us.’
I would ask, ‘see where it takes us…’ Really?’
After all this time and this is where the MOH is at? So much for robust processes, transparency, safe and effective ‘vaccine,’ post adverse injection event planning? How would the Team of 5 million respond to this absence of due diligence, if this was included in the Government Briefings, I wonder?
What can anyone expect, in terms of a duty of care, if one is unfortunate enough to experience an adverse reaction in NZ, to the Pfizer Comirnaty injection?
How much money is paid to employ the experts on this panel?
No problem finding funds for their salaries?
I would post the link, but it’s gone, along with the complete transcript and additional information. If you request it under the OIA, will you be informed that like most documents so far, this is ‘confidential?’
We seem to have an epidemic of ‘confidentiality’ for those who are employed to ensure Regulation, Assurance and Protection are complied with and no ‘Community Immunity’ for ‘Transparency.’
Maybe someone who is a health professional can access the webinar link?
The complete webinar and the section of concern, watch from the 4.12 minute mark.
Note: the commentary for this post from fb is author unknown, please advise if you wrote it. I did try to locate the author. EWR