EWR comment: I personally have been hearing mainstream radio news items warning that doctors in NZ are spreading misinformation about the experimental injection for CV.
A Stuff article states:
The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners is calling for patients and doctors to rely on “evidence-based” information to make decisions and give advice about the vaccine.
I am wondering why no reference by mainstream is being made to the “evidence” in the various government data bases, in particular, USA, UK and EUR, the stats of which are being posted regularly at many websites, one in particular, Health Impact News. See our front, News page, right hand column for their latest stats.
NZ lawyer Sue Grey comments: “NZ doctors who have raised concerns about this experimental jab are doing exactly what the law and medical ethics require. https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/125411083/covid19-multiple-complaints-over-antivaccine-doctors
For good information on alternatives to the experimental jab, check out www.nzdsos.com ”
Environmental Health Watch NZ 
The doctors in question are not anti-vaxers as so colourfully headlined by the MSM, they expressed their concerns about the vaccines employed to combat Covid-19 and I for one totally agree with their viewpoint and their concerns.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Same Pete. People need to know… it’s called fully informed consent. Something our gov doesn’t seem to believe in.
LikeLiked by 1 person
They can’t be called vaccines until they have been given that status by authorities following the required length of evaluation — until that happens in 2023 they are Experimental Medical Treatments.
LikeLiked by 1 person