The Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Briefing Document on the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains disturbing indications that might be a safety signal on pathogenic priming, especially in older adults.
In the development of vaccines against coronaviruses like SARS-COV-1 and MERS in the early 2000’s, researchers found evidence of a serious problem. Teams of U.S. and foreign scientists vaccinated animals with the four most promising vaccines. At first, the experiment seemed successful as all the animals developed a robust antibody response to coronavirus. However, when the scientists exposed the vaccinated animals to the wild virus, the results were horrifying. Vaccinated animals suffered hyper-immune responses including inflammation throughout their bodies, especially in their lungs.
This issue is well known. Early in the COVID-19 scenario, Dr. Peter Hotez, of Baylor College of Medicine, testified before Congress about the dangers of accelerating…
View original post 751 more words
Environmental Health Watch NZ 
I’m not surprised at all. With all I’ve read and studied about these things, they are meant to harm, not help.
Remember me? I raised 2 vaccine-injured children and am vaccine-injured myself. After studying the ingredient list, I cannot believe all these so-called professionals are not screaming from mountain-tops.
This issue needs to be taken to the International Criminal Court. All these shots violate the Nuremberg Code. I do mean ALL.
LikeLiked by 1 person
yes they do Joyce … and yes I remember you
LikeLiked by 1 person
This has never been about a virus–it has always been about genetic modification–and control.
LikeLiked by 2 people