Published on Nov 11, 2018
Published on Nov 11, 2018
I am not totally familiar, like the man in the second video, with the issues around this man’s arrest. There is much info being broadcast on alternative media, and not being in the UK it is difficult to make comment on those issues. The point of the post was the denial of freedom of speech. Time will tell on the rest of the situation. If you are in the UK please send any info you may have or feel needs airing on this.
28/5/18 The death throes of democracy people. Folk are outraged as they should be, it’s a canary in the mine warning really. As I’ve been repeating for ages now, it is part of the global plan, global governance. It is not a friendly village that’s envisaged people. As they would have you to believe. Were it a friendly village then you would not have this fascist u turn where all justice is denied & dissenting voices are shut down. The end game in reality is total global lockdown. If you’ve hitherto scoffed at this as fairy material, go and read Mike Adams’ exposé if you haven’t already. (And/or read our Agenda 21/30 pages & line up all the other things that are happening as we speak). Or if you’ve already read this info & didn’t believe it, read it again. Little by little, as frogs in the warming pot, they’ve slipped in the lies under the guise of sustainability. But, is there really anything green going on? Better read that ‘alternative’ info fast because it’s not too long before it will all be gone from the internet as well.
Published on May 26, 2018
Freedom of the press is gone.
Published on May 27, 2018
Graeme Sturgeon, a man who was assaulted, then himself charged with assault, and the case subsequently dismissed, is now faced with costs of $22K. For more background on the story go to this link. EnvirowatchRangitikei
STATE CORRUPTION – WHAT WOULD YOU DO IN GRAEME’S PLACE ?
MEMORANDUM IN RESPECT OF GRAEME STURGEON AND REMEDIES AGAINST DOC FOR ASSAULT ON 17 OCTOBER 2017 – WHITIANGA, COROMANDEL
By Carol Sawyer
Here attached is the legal advice Graeme Sturgeon received today from his barrister Greg Bradford about ways forward. I have both Graeme and his barrister Greg Bradford’s permission ( via Graeme ) to make this public.
It’s longish but I urge you to read it. It has huge ramifications for any dealings we have with the courts with regard to fighting 1080.
Graeme is contemplating his options.
This is an extremely interesting memorandum ! It is impressively honest, and very sobering.
Please note Option 2 in particular. Here is an excerpt from Option 2 – “Par for course in this situation DOC, armed with lots of resources, would try and “burn you off” by taking every procedural step available, appeal every procedural step if possible and protract the proceedings so that you cannot bear the costs of continuing the same.”
So… Graeme Sturgeon gets assaulted by a DoC security guard in a completely unprovoked attack. His legal bill, for two court hearings and a two-day trial is $22,338.75 up to this point.
One hundred of us, exactly, have put $10,100 towards this cost, ( $9150 via the Givealittle campaign, and $950 privately ).
The government has ROBBED US ALL !
Graeme has been assaulted, and then robbed of a large amount of money – by our government’s actions.
The judge dismissed the case, but Graeme and his wife Julie went through what they say is ” the worst three months” of their lives, and have a massive legal bill to show for it. Bear in mind NO COSTS WERE AWARDED !
It should also be remembered that without the security footage showing what happened, Graeme would more than likely have been convicted. DoC were legally obliged to supply that footage within 21 days. It took them three months to do so. Until virtually the last minute before the two day trial they would only supply six seconds of the 15 minute footage, showing Graeme flailing his arms at the security guard ( but not connecting ), in an attempt to show Graeme was attacking guard Lane.
This delay in getting much needed evidence on Graeme and his lawyer’s part added hugely to the financial burden.
READ THE MEMORANDUM:
1.Graeme after the assault, when he had been hauled from his vehicle by security guard, Richard Lane, in an unprovoked attack, in a public carpark, with no signs saying ” Keep Out’ and in total darkness.
2.The Memorandum from barrister Greg Bradford
FROM AN OBSERVER AT THE TRIAL:
WAYNE WILLIAMS WAS AT THE COURT IN THAMES FOR THE WHOLE TRIAL – THIS IS HIS VERSION OF THE PROCEEDINGS
“Right from the opening statements the prosecution was painting a picture of Graeme Sturgeon as a real hell-raising rebel. Twisting facts, pressuring for mistakes. It’s pretty obvious in the security video if you look at the continuation of ( security guard ) Richard Lane’s movements. After wrenching the door open he lunged inside, punching Graeme at this stage. Completely disorientating him.
Now Lane commented here that he thought Graeme was reaching for a weapon. A convenient statement to justify his illegal entry. At no time did he stop and/or say anything to alert Graeme. This was a cowardly ambush. Even the judge repeatedly picked up on this heinous omission.
Why were better options not taken ? His reaction was “Basically I assumed he ( Graeme ) was trying to arm himself”. The fact that Lane was unlicensed at this point was factored in, but not emphasised enough as to have a big bearing on it Just noted. The truck driver who was within a few metres distance repeatedly claimed that he could see Graeme punching Lane and kicking him in the stomach. But this was proven to be inaccurate because of very limited light and because Lane was actually obscuring his viewpoint. This witness repeatedly fumbled replies, trying to stick to the rehearsed fabrication. He even made the statement that he was afraid Graeme was going to actually drive into his truck. Panicky at this point, he was. But yet he was still considered a credible witness later in the judge’s summing up.
Next up Graeme Sturgeon took the stand. He was very firm in his recollection of events up to being assaulted by Lane. Then understandably shaken up. He denied kicking Lane. And the video does clearly show him swinging punches in defense. I only saw one actually connect with Lanes head. A glance. We watched this video probably 20 times, and at slow speeds as well.
Lane claimed he had a sore jaw for a month, and a sore stomach for a couple of days. Now at no time was any first aid offered to Graeme.
Lane was on a mission, also harassing Dr. Wendy Pond and Diana Halstead. Lane also claimed there were half a dozen protestors with placards out the front so he was expecting trouble. This was another wildly inaccurate statement used to justify his actions. In fact there were onlythree people and it was not obvious that they were protestors. They had no placards.
So that was the the end of Day One and the subsequent unprofessionalism of the reporter there meant Graeme Sturgeon got a roasting in the news report – trial and conviction by media. Before the verdict. We just want fair representation from media. That’s not too much to ask.
Onto day two. Little big Wendy. First up. Very well spoken. Knowledgeable. Accurate. And she wouldn’t let the prosecution rattle her, actually calling the officer ridiculous.
And our next witness Diana Halstead also spoke very well. She stuck to her points even when the prosecutor repeatedly tried to twist her version of events and timing of headlights etc. Her reason for being there was being with Graeme. She was shocked by Lane’s thuggery. And then she told of the police officer who attended – and getting a very mediocre response. He spoke to DoC staff first and did not even check Graeme’s injuries. He was just there to basically take down time sequence events, and to organize statements at a later date, as the security detail had disappeared with the 1080 poison-loaded trucks by this time.
So overall it was a complete fabrication to try and make the case. But I don’t think this was a clear cut result, as it could easily have gone the other way. So those three seconds of door opening ( Graeme Sturgeon’s vehicle ) which were hidden from view were critical to the point that the judge was quite correct in summing up. There is no evidence that either threw the first punch and Graeme undoubtedly was acting in self defense against an extremely savage attack from Lane. Case dismissed. Victory for us.”
Photo – Graeme Sturgeon after being punched by Richard Lane
Here is the incredible testimony of a young woman who against all odds survived the medical system that appears not only to have harmed her with a vaccine (the vaccine was followed by ongoing debilitating illness) but also to have caused her to contract life threatening cancer. This smart woman, having already lost several family members from cancer, then declines the standard offering of radiation and chemotherapy which only works 3% of the time, and did her own research on cures. She came up with the Gerson therapy and treated herself all the way to wellness, at her own expense. A must listen and clear proof of the miserable success rate the standard mainstream medical and pharmaceutical industry can offer you. We ought all to learn from this woman and follow suit. Learn further on how the medical industry was heisted in the early part of the twentieth century by wealthy people, resulting in the treatment of symptoms. A veritable cash cow. Our key to health is a strong immune system, not what is currently offered in the form of vaccines, pills and artificial chemicals. See our Cancer pages for further info and learn of other success stories, and watch the video here for the full story told by this brave young woman who has beaten the death sentence.
Erin was a completely healthy college student who was asked to take Gardasil as part of a trial. Within 24 hours she was violently sick, vomiting, and went on to develop Cervical cancer within 18 months, the very thing the vaccine was supposed to protect her from.
For further info:
With all the information now flowing about how a smart meter is not compulsory and notification of intention to install is required – how can these companies continue on their aggressively persistent mission to ensure we all have one? Legally that is.
Following our recent post about the installation of a Smart (electricity) Meter on a NZ home in Taumaranui where the owner had not given consent and had in fact locked the meter – yet undeterred the lines people broke into the meter box! And here we have more of the same, this time a Smart water Meter was installed. The report comes from stopsmartmeters.org.nz …
This morning www.stopsmartmeters.org.nz received an email from a concerned resident of Huia Street in Waiuku to say that on Monday (February 29, 2016) she found a card in her letter box informing her that a smart water meter had been installed for her home as part of a trial.
This home owner did not consent to the installation of this device which is designed to produce microwave radiation to send data about water use. In fact just the previous Friday she had received notification from the company that her “water meter did not need to be replaced.”
According to Watercare’s website the smart water meters that it is installing will transmit only once per day; however this information cannot be independently verified at this stage as the company did not state the make and model of the meter on its website. (The type of smart water meter trialed in Tairua transmits every eight seconds.)
The type of radiation produced by smart water meters (and smart electricity meters) has been classified as possible carcinogen (class 2B) by the World Health Organisation’s International Agency for Research on Cancer.
You can find more info at the above site on how to avoid getting a Smart (aka Advanced) Meter or how to get rid of one if you already have one. The site manager is contactable and helpful if you are having difficulties. Also check out our Smart Meter pages for further info &/or follow us to receive updates. Most importantly, watch the doco Take Back Your Power, links are at the site.
For further articles on Smart Meters, water or electricity, go to categories at the left of any page. Not all of the related articles are on the pages here.