Listen at the link:
Five minutes in hear more on the Vax Challenge with Sue Grey speaking about the case outcome.
For background info go here
“From Outdoors party press release: “It is arguable that the Crown has acted unlawfully”!
We won because we were right. We lost because the judge is going to let them do it anyway.
The press release says:
*“The High Court has just released its decision on the urgent challenge to the Pfizer vaccine approval and vaccination rollout plan, agreeing with the plaintiff that it was reasonably arguable that the Minister’s approval was unlawful. Her Honour Justice Ellis has agreed that everyone in New Zealand over 16 is not a limited number of patients, and so the decision is arguably ultra vires the requirements of s23 of the Medicines Act, and she has urged the government to reconsider the lawfulness of the provisional consent they granted for the Pfizer vaccine. Her Honour stopped short of ordering the vaccine rollout to stop, out of concern of undermining public confidence in the vaccine and wasting vaccine stock that is already in New Zealand.””
(Above comment by Amanda Vickers at facebook).
Legally, citing Lawyer, Sue Grey’s conclusions:
“..the judge urged the Crown to [re]consider the law carefully… That’s about all she can do due to a law passed in 2016”.
You can hear Sue’s commentary (pre govt’s subsequent announcements) here at this link.
However…. the Crown has now come up with a Plan B, saying they had been going to tweak the provisional law anyway!
“Health Minister Andrew Little says Section 23 has been used over 40 years by successive Governments to grant early access to approved therapeutic substances when it is in the public good.”
(Links to mainstream media’s coverage are below)
Sue comments regarding today’s emergency reform:
“The government has announced an emergency reform of the Medicines Act because they were copped acting unlawfully. But it’s not even on the listed Parliamentary business… They apparently have no respect for any rules, for truth or justice and accordingly no business representing us” (Sue Grey, Lawyer).
FURTHER UPDATE (19/5/21)
“Attorney-General David Parker misleading Parliament. They have made the new amendment “Notwithstanding s22….” Section 22 requires the benefit of a new medicine to exceed the risks. The removal of this criteria is a fundamental and very serious change. Why would anyone who is supposed to represent the public interest approve a new medicine on a provisional or any other basis if the benefit does NOT exceed the risks? This is what happens when the PM and Ministers arrogantly ignore an open letter then rush through law without consultation or social licence.” (Sue Grey, Lawyer)
Read at the mainstream sources below & decide for yourself. Those who wish to take this experimental injection, that is their personal right & choice. And those who do not, likewise. The point of this challenge in court was that the provisional approval was for a limited number of people only, not for all of NZ. However, as we can see here, the Crown will sort that no problem, by tweaking the paperwork. It has been clear from the media spin from way back that it is their intention to have everybody take the experimental injection anyway. After all they have purchased enough supplies to accommodate every Kiwi for two doses. As her Honour Judge Ellis has said yesterday … in spite of the aforementioned cautionary statements, they don’t want to waste that stock or undermine public confidence.
I note the ‘limited number’ concern seems to have now slipped into oblivion.
New Zealand is changing the law TODAY (Robin Westenra @ seemorerocks website)
Info on emergency approval at Pfizer’s source country: https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/vaccines/emergency-use-authorization-vaccines-explained
Snippets from some who were there Nga Kaitiaki Tuku Iho Medical Society Inc v Minister of Health, Prime Minister and others 12 May 2021 High Court Wellington For more information please see www.kti.org.nz.
LATEST UPDATES AT THE TOP OF PAGE:
18/05/21 Court Decision in today, hear Sue Grey describe the situation (basically the Court’s acknowledged the concerns which need looking at … more info to come I believe):
And … ‘we’ll just tweak the law’:
Short live update from Sue this morning (a decision expected within a week, possibly this week… have a listen though as Sue updates on Court & how it went yesterday).
12/5/21 PM… Update from Voices for Freedom:
“COURT UPDATE The reports are in that Sue has done an incredible job this morning to represent the interests of New Zealanders standing up to unlawful government behaviour! Word is that the judge has been listening. She was unaware of the VAERS system and is asking some good questions. She is entertaining the idea that the rollout has been unlawful. Crown law have been arguing that the “limited” wording was used due to the initial rollout to the border workers. It appears that this is their way of justifying the use of the specific section of the Medicines Act. Sue has argued back that if this was the case, and the border workers theoretically work in a scenario with higher risk, then how can this be lawfully extended to the broader public? We have just caught snippets during the lunch break and will bring you another update with more information later in the day! Join the movement!” www.voicesforfreedom.co.nz/join-us
Listen at the link: https://www.facebook.com/sue.grey.9469/videos/874470613108710
Hear from Sue at the Nelson Airport updating us on progress before she leaves for Wellington. If you are able to attend, even if you cannot get in, please do go & support her on behalf of all NZers.
Thank you to Sue for all she is doing to challenge this important point our government is overlooking about the CV injection … approval for a limited number only to take an experimental injection – not most of NZ.
Martin Harris from Uncensored reports the following (sent to him by a close contact and reliable source):
“Thought you might be interested to know, four people —— works with have had the COVID vaccine (he’s refused it) as they do some work in—————, two of them ended up having severe reactions to it & one is currently in intensive care in hospital, trouble breathing at first but now kidneys failing & brain swell … somehow I don’t think mainstream media will want to share that kind of info!”
Lawyer Sue Grey also reports on her facebook page:
“I’m receiving reports of many sudden post vax deaths. How come only two have been reported to CARM? Why is Medsafe not actively following up ALL post vax deaths like they do with c-v-d? It only has provisional consent subject to 58 conditions for a limited number of patients. It is experimental and ALL its effects must be carefully scrutinized”.
If you or someone you know have experienced any of the above scenarios, let us know. We can publish it with discretion (no names). It is unfortunate we are having to do this but it’s clear these are not being reported officially.
Sue Grey 1.94K subscribers
Update about KTI’s urgent challenge to the High Court about the lawfulness of the provisional consent of the Pfizer vaccine and its rollout to everyone in NZ over 16 years, and the appointment of a barrister in anticipation of a document dump by the crown later this week.
WATCH AT THE LINK: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8QavaKo7lw
AND HERE (commentary on the new Order as of 30 April)
INFORMATION AT THE LINK:
Note: in her interview with Peter Williams, Lawyer Sue Grey mentions the death of a Feilding nurse at the Palmerston North Hospital the day after taking the CV VX.
The ‘no jab, no job’ policy is applying to front line workers. EWR
From The Health Forum NZ
“Its been a huge week in NZ CV VX land…The fudging of the truths have been coming thick and fast.
Lawyer Sue Grey posted the following…Quote…
“The most blatant false claims I’ve seen are the misrepresentations in the government advertising campaign, some of which have been identified in the KTI High Court Challenge. Some examples of concern to me include:
A)The government advertising using public funds to incorrectly claim the Vax is safe because it has Medsafe approval, when in fact it has only provisional consent subject to 58 conditions and even full message approval does NOT warrant safety
B) Claims the Vax is safe when the clinical safety trials won’t be complete until 2023
C) Claims the Vax is safe when it has not been tested for safety for pregnant women, for people who are frail, for people on anticoagulants or other medications, or for people who have recently had another vaccine
D) Government websites when reporting adverse events (including vaers.com and the EU equivalent), record thousands of post Vax deaths and tens of thousands of strokes, and other outcomes which result in hospitalisation
E) The increasing number of post Vax deaths and hospitalisations in NZ (including the sudden Remuera death and many other similar post Vax unexplained deaths and hospitalisations) which are either not getting reported to the NZ equivalent “CARM” or are being overlooked in weekly reports.
F) The misleading claims about effectiveness as government fine print admits the Pfizer Vax does not prevent infection or transmission and may create asymptomatic carriers. Nobody knows the long term effects of the Vax but they are now talking about recipients needing a top up each year
G) Many countries, including India, Israel, Chile, Samoa, Fiji, Seychelle and Bhutan had another wave of Covid (in many cases their worst wave) AFTER the Vax rollout.
H) At least 40 NZ doctors have signed an OPEN LETTER expressing concern about the Vax rollout and the undermining of INFORMED CONSENT
I) Many healthy NZers who are are at no significant risk from Covid are being bullied to accept this Vax by the government’s “No Jab No Job” policy. This policy is cruel, irrational and is in breach of fundamental employment rights, human rights and the Nuremberg code. When the government overrides fundamental human rights and circulates misleading information for its own purposes contrary to the interests of the people it represents, we have a major constitutional problem.
Photo: By Nick-D – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=27675283
The thin end of the wedge? And thanks again to real reporting by Peter Williams. One can only ponder on how long he will be allowed to balance the discussion with other narratives? EWR
Hear Sue Grey (NZ Lawyer) discuss with Peter Williams, Magic Talk Radio host, the mandated vx for border workers and how this impacts on human rights issues. Peter speaks a little to the issue from 7 mins in. At 36 minutes, Sue speaks. Peter recalls that on 3rd February the PM Jacinda Adern said the vaccine would not be compulsory but that the government would be considering health and safety regulations. Now you have to be vaccinated if you’re a front line worker. (We are speaking of course of the CV experimental injection). This impacts on the rights of employees of course.
A must listen. And stay tuned.
LISTEN AT THE LINK
From Tribe of Kiwis YT channel
Voices For Freedom article (2 Apr 2021) “Who Cares If It’s Not The Law?” – with a preview of many of the source materials as the reading progresses. All SOURCES and LINKS are in the Show Notes below (click on “SHOW MORE”)
0:51 The Letter
2:04 1. The Approval Process
3:47 2. Marketing the Pfizer Vaccine
8:28 3. Administration of Pfizer Vaccine
9:45 Informed Consent
11:15 Remedies Sought
12:27 So Who Does Care?
15:56 What’s next?
All SOURCES: More Information and Credits: See the SHOW NOTES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N… COPYRIGHT CREDITS (in video order) and thanks to: SOURCE TEXT for reading: Voices For Freedom (2 Apr 2021) “Who cares if it’s not the law? Why holding our government officials to account matters.” https://voicesforfreedom.co.nz/who-ca… The source article is responding to Sue Grey’s letter of 31 Mar 2021, published here: https://www.outdoorsparty.co.nz/sue-g… See further related materials in the SHOW NOTES – link above. “FAIR USE” VIDEO & SOUND clips These are used for the purposes of education, discussion and commentary: – NZ PM, VIDEO: speaking to a Press Conference (published 15 May 2020) https://youtu.be/ENEUktOrQV8 Jacinda Ardern – “We will continue to be your single source of truth. Otherwise, dismiss anything else.” – NZ PM VIDEO: Jacinda Ardern speaking to a Press Conference (published 1 Mar 2021) https://youtu.be/nqEVtGrluaA Talks about using “sustained propaganda”. LICENCED CLIPS: “Sunrise” video – Bellergy (Pixabay licence) In Intro & Outro: “The Last Days” Lyrics, music and performance © S Stevenson (with permission) A PETITION to the NZ PARLIAMENT was earlier promoted on this channel on the topic of “Informed Consent” re the vaccine. https://youtu.be/O–hz53ACVo Petition request: (300 character max) “That the House of Representatives urge the Government to ensure that the use of any coronavirus vaccine is voluntary in New Zealand and that no coercion will be applied to NZers from Government or private entities to take it.” The petition ran until 5 Nov 2020 and received 5,000+ signatures. A detailed SUPPORTING DOCUMENT was provided to the petition site, but could not be linked to the petition as no space is provided for evidential support on the government website. You can access (and download) that document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14… Ep 4 of the Tribe of Kiwis series “Is the NZ Government Manufacturing Consent?” was also on the topic of Informed Consent in NZ, focusing on the Nuremberg Code and the official Guidelines for the Public Service Commission. See here: https://youtu.be/S9ai4NasMPE SUBSCRIBE for an alert for the next episode in the series. Tribe of Kiwis is a place for conversation about things that matter to ordinary Kiwis – people who want to consider and share information important to our shared future …… and that of our children and grandchildren. Email: email@example.com
Thanks to Sue Grey and her tireless work on behalf of Kiwis.
UPDATES: Newest at top
VIDEO FROM HIGH COURT:
Note: 5th May will be a public hearing apparently. Be there and support if you can. For further info updates go to Sue’s FB page.
For background info go here.
Most New Zealanders are unaware that their country is being hijacked – and by default, they actually voted for this, thinking the Government would take care of their interests, because … “it is kind”, however, this is not necessarily the case.
In this interview of Sue Grey, lawyer from Nelson who has also researched Health issues and has a degree in biochemistry, we learn that things are definitely not as they seem. She has been an activist on the battle front over the last decade endeavouring to bring transparency to so many of the issues that now are bearing down on us and now – totally surround us.
From NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey:
UPDATE ON VAX CHALLENGE
“Joe Rifici and I outside the Nelson Court after Joe had just affirmed his affidavit. We have now emailed two powerful affidavits, one from Joe and another from the bravest Doctor in New Zealand, plus an Open Letter from over 30 NZ doctors and many other documents to the High Court in Wellington and to the Prime Minister, DGHealth, Attorney General and others.
We have asked for an urgent hearing.
I’m hoping the Court will facilitate this and the Crown will cooperate.
I will keep you posted on progress.Please also check on www.kti.org.nz.If you are able to offer to help in any way please contact us on firstname.lastname@example.org.
Bit late notice sorry. Just seen this & posting FYI for those who may not be aware. (For Sue’s letter to government see this post):
LISTEN at THE LINK:
RE PFIZER VACCINE “COMIRNATY” RE BREACHES OF MEDICINES ACT, MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CLAIMS and OTHER MATTERS
I represent a large number of New Zealanders who are extremely concerned about apparent legal breaches and misleading and deceptive representations in the provisional approval, promotion, marketing and roll out of the novel Pfizer mRNA and nanogel vaccine known as “Comirnaty” (“the Pfizer injection”).
READ MORE: https://www.outdoorsparty.co.nz/sue-grey-open-letter-to-prime-minister/?fbclid=IwAR1Xtb6UcDYnAPvhy90a0wNARN1wxxqDhCwebi03eo95CTLW7VNVFLpxr8I
RESPONSE BELOW FROM GOVT CHIEF LEGAL ADVISOR:
Sue Grey LLB(Hons), BSc (Biochemistry & Microbiology), RSHDipPHI introduces some of the safety shortcuts and concerns with the co-vax and the need for informed consent
Video from the GrafBoys YT channel. It questions the independence of the investigation following the poisoning of 8 cows during a 1080 drop in 2018. Intriguing information you likely weren’t aware of about the various players involved.
Sue Grey joins Tim to champion the grassroots movements that are questioning the motives behind the proliferation of 5G technology
From Alan Simmons at alansimmons.co.nz
Alan is President & Co-Leader of the NZ Outdoors Party
On the weekend of 29th June a peaceful protest held vigil outside the te Papa Museum in Wellington to show Forest and Bird members attending their annual conference that their support for blanket poisoning of over two million hectares of New Zealand back country was opposed by many.
The protest was peaceful and respectful holding up placards about 20 meters from the doors and handing out brochures to those who wanted them. Many of the Forest and Bird members stopped to talk and it became apparent that a lot were totally opposed to the widespread use or poisons but seemed powerless to change the opinion of the executive.
Suddenly out from within the Conference a male emerged angry and on a mission yelling abuse at the protesters and wanting to engage in a yelling match. Security tried to come between him and the protesters and worked really hard to pacify him but his demeanor increased to the point that one of the female protesters, he was right in her face, lawyer, Sue Grey felt quite threatened and started to film it.
At this point I have to say the security team on duty were excellent and tried to come between him and get him to calm down. Suddenly he appeared to lash out at Sue Grey and everyone thought he had punched her but instead he had snatcher her phone from right beside her face and started to walk off with it.
As he did so the security guards followed him and tried to retrieve the phone. He was now walking quickly away with the phone and I personally ran after him and confronted him asking his name and telling him that he had stolen a lawyers phone with privileged information on it and we would be laying charges with the police. At this point he reluctantly handed the phone over and headed back to re-enter the building however the security guards prevented him from doing so, telling him to leave and he then quickly marched off into the city.
I am sure I saw him a few hours later walk back to the conference dressed differently. No charges have been laid because we don’t know who he was but I’m sure Forest and Bird do as he would have been on their list of attendees. If anyone does know who he was please let me know. His photo is below.
here is some video of him before he became very angry.
Video Credit: Sue Grey
Do you find it curious that nobody as yet has come forward and identified this man? He is somebody’s father, brother, cousin, employee, employer, neighbour, friend, enemy even? Curious indeed. He looks to me like a man with a mission and not some random member of the public. Just my opinion of course. EWR
A wee ‘small’ reminder of the honesty of the plebs who run the NZ corporation …
Remember this post on social media? September just gone? QUOTE:
“I was there last week
Doc wouldn’t let our lawyer cross examine their scientists and court allowed that. Lawyer won hands down against doc
They couldn’t prove 1080 safety…..TOTAL CORRUPTION
Our lawyer proved by DoC’s own files they were lying …but we LOST”
NOTE: SINCE THIS POSTED, I’VE HEARD THE DROP IS NOT GOING AHEAD AT THIS STAGE. STILL IN COURT…. (PS 19/1/2019 … it DID of course go ahead).
Why do they not want their scientist cross examined? Couldn’t stand the heat? Don’t have the back up science for their data? Could be anybody’s guess but certainly not rocket science. Whatever side of the fence you sit on the 1080 issue, this is about justice of which there appears to be very little these days, remembering Graeme Sturgeon for instance & his ‘win’ that left him with $23K court costs. Looking from afar here we are being sent a very clear message which I’m sure you can figure out for yourselves.
Further comment from Facebook today:
“I was there last week
DoC wouldn’t let our lawyer cross examine their scientists and court allowed that. Lawyer won hands down against DoC
They couldn’t prove 1080 safety…..TOTAL CORRUPTION
Our lawyer proved by DoC’s own files they were lying …but we LOST”
There have been thousands of cases of poisoned farm animals, non-targeted wildlife, pets, and people following 1080 poison and brodifacoum aerial operations across New Zealand.
Not surprisingly, those involved with the aerial poisoning drops – our government, the Department of Conservation, TB Free, regional councils … and ironically, those that sign the drops off – the district health boards – have never compiled a register of the incidents that have taken place over the years.
So some intellects from around the country decided to put together some of the known poisoning cases, including people that have been crying out to be heard for so long.
In the following video clip lawyer Sue Grey and Waikato Regional Councillor for Taupo, Kathy White, explain how they attempted to present the poisoning register to members of parliament (on a typically windy day) …
For information on the Govt owned Whanganui 1080 factory go here.