- The Facts:Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, who is the University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics and has worked directly with governments on various geopolitical issues has spoken out against weather modification and the long history of its use.
- Reflect On:Why are we spraying things into our atmosphere without the people being aware of it? Why is it such a secretive issue? Should we not know about it? Why is this topic never brought up in the climate change discussion?
See also our climate pages for further info on the climate change scam that is being used to create panic & usher in the new world order global governance carry on aka Agenda 21/30 (check out the sub pages also at those links). EWR
(Natural News) The climate change hoax has collapsed. A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.
Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”
The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.
As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:
QUOTE: “You know, the fact of the matter is people have too much space in their houses … if we could just share our space with other family members we would reduce our housing needs right there…”
This I find hypocritical, ironic as well, in light of a common question asked by landlords ‘how many of you will be living here?’ followed by the predictable statement … ‘you can’t bring all your family here to live’, the stereotype being that indigenous people like living together in over crowded conditions. Further on in this video they cite Asian families doing so & suddenly now it’s a great thing because it suits the liars’ agenda. Initially it was better for consumerism that we are all separate in separate households racking up purchases & inevitably debt these days because we have abandoned the old ways … and now the Agenda 21/30 agenda is for us to occupy cramped stack & pack housing in their smart cities and it’s all okay. Don’t be fooled folks, they really are not for you. They are for their own ends only. Sustainable Development aka Agenda 21 is a scam being foisted upon you by stealth. Remember the bedroom tax in the UK? They’ve hinted at it here as well with the last census asking for an indication of the number of rooms in our houses. Similarly with the remaining State Housing stock (the state asset that the corrupt corporates have flogged off for pennies on the dollar to developers, some 22% of it by the last government) … so when a person’s partner dies or a parent of children living in a state home, they swoop in with eviction notices because of ‘wasted’ space, and demand they move into smaller accommodation. At that previous link 5 grieving children are evicted prior to their mother’s taangi being arranged! And locals said this kind of occurrence was not uncommon. Now if you think I’m being conspiratorial just watch & see how it pans out. A reader contacted me some time ago with an OIA response from the Christchurch District Council stating that they aren’t following an Agenda 21 agenda and that this is actually called Sustainable Development. I note however that Kaikoura District Council does (scroll to ‘Earthcheck’). Agenda 21 is named on their website.
At least listen & hear from the horse’s mouth here in the video what they have planned for you. Remember this is global not just California. EWR
- PLANS FOR 34,500 NEW HOMES AT PUKEKOHE… LOOKING LIKE AGENDA 21/30 PACK & STACK HOUSING
- DID YOU KNOW NZ IS SIGNED ON TO A UN PLAN THAT REQUIRES AMONG OTHER THINGS HIGH DENSITY (FORCED) URBANISATION, A REDUCTION IN PRIVATE PROPERTY RIGHTS & DEPOPULATION?
- THE CROWN OWNED TAMAKI REGENERATION CO. EVICTS 5 GRIEVING CHILDREN 3 WKS AFTER THEIR MOTHER’S DEATH – A NOT UNCOMMON OCCURRENCE WE’RE TOLD
- CHRISTCHURCH 2030 AGENDA END-GAME: GLOBAL SETTLEMENT
The hoax of the man-made Global Warming is being imposed on the world by many methods, both subtle and blatant. Proponents of the Global Green Agenda have embarked on a programme of mass deception, while scientists who attempt to blow the whistle on the fraud are silenced, tarred, ridiculed and fired. The Gaian cult that has permeated the United Nations is using the hysteria of Global Warming to impose draconian control measures on society and centralise world power.
“Humanity is sitting on a time bomb. If the vast majority of the
world’s scientists are right, we have just ten years to avert a
major catastrophe that could send our entire planet’s climate system
into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods,
droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have
ever experienced – a catastrophe of our own making.“
– Al Gore,
An Inconvenient Truth
With the continual bombardment of ‘climate doom’ stories today, it is hard to imagine a time when global warming was not a ‘top priority’ on the social, political and economic agenda. Everything from floods in England to poverty in the Third World is now being blamed on global warming. However, it is a relatively new phenomenon, barely discussed until 20 years ago, and established as a significant policy issue only in the past 15 or so years.
Usually a scientific theory takes many decades to become established, and only after the most rigorous testing under many different scenarios, does it achieve ‘scientific consensus’. However, when it comes to Global Warming its proponents claim that there is no argument or debate to be had. Their current crusade is to turn Global Warming into something that supposedly no honest and decent person can disagree about, as they have already done with ‘environmental sustainability’. Al Gore often says “Climate change is a moral issue.” In other words it is all about you, and your destructive behaviour.
The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has confidently announced ‘the science is settled’ on man-made Global Warming. Their most recent set of reports declares that “the debate over the science of climate change is well and truly over. Unified international political commitment is now urgently required to take action to avoid dangerous climate change.”
However, the science is not settled. Many renowned climatologists strongly disagree with the IPCC’s conclusions about the cause and potential magnitude of Global Warming. More than 20,000 scientists have now signed the Oregon Petition which criticises it as ‘flawed’ research and states that “any human contribution to climate change has not yet been demonstrated.” Dr Chris Landsea resigned from the IPCC because he “personally could not in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”
The IPCC claims that more than 2,500 respected scientists and policy makers collaborate to write its climate change assessments but less than a tenth of these ‘experts’ actually hold qualifications in climatology, most were in fact educated in the political and social sciences. The panel that edits and approves the reports are appointed by the United Nations, and more than half are actually UN officials. Dr Richard Lindzen, who is a genuine climate expert, resigned from the IPCC process after his contributions were completely rewritten by the panel.
“It’s not 2,500 people offering their consensus, I participated in that. Each person who is an author writes one or two pages in conjunction with someone else. They travel around the world several times a year for several years to write it and the summary for policymakers has the input of a handful of scientists, but ultimately, it is written by representatives of governments, and of environmental organizations, each pushing their own agenda.” – MIT’s Professor of Atmospheric Science Dr. Richard Lindzen on the IPCC report.
Czech President Klaus stated “It is not fair to refer to the UN panel as a group of scientists. The IPCC is not a scientific institution. It’s a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavour. It’s neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists, and UN bureaucrats, who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment.”
Asserting ‘the science is settled’ ignores the debate that still rages, and the constant shrieking by alarmists like Al Gore reveals that Global Warming is being used to push a hidden agenda. They are not really interested in the science at all. Even their much vaunted consensus is a myth. The Global Warming Petition Project has been signed by more than 31,000 American scientists, including more than 9,000 with PhDs. Signers include world renowned physicists such as Prof. Edward Teller and Prof. Freeman Dyson. Nearly 4,000 signers are scientists trained in specialties directly related to the physical environment of the Earth and the past and current phenomena that affect that environment.
The petition states: “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”
Proclaiming that “climate change is real” is a nonsensical statement and ignores the Earth’s continual natural warming and cooling cycles. Vikings settled in Greenland and raised crops and cattle 1000 years ago, while Britons grew grapes in England. Four hundred years later, Greenland froze and the Vikings starved. Europe was gripped in a Little Ice Age. The Thames froze all the way up to London. Another surge in temperatures saw widespread global droughts in the mid-1600s. Temperatures plunged again around 1700’s. The globe warmed in 1800-1940, cooled for the next 35 years, then warmed again. The 1940-1975 cooling period occurred despite the fact that industrial production and release of CO2 vastly accelerated during this time. This led to political and media scaremongering about Global Cooling, and the threat of a new ice age.
Again, this arose out of a misunderstanding of long term temperature fluctuations. Scientists have discovered that the sun not only has a regular 11 year cycle of sunspot activity. They have now discovered a significant 200 year cycle. Sunspot and solar radiation activity almost exactly parallel temperature changes on the Earth. It correlates well with the anomalous post-war temperature dip, when global carbon dioxide levels were rising very fast. The increase in solar radiation prevents the formation of clouds, which have a cooling effect on the planet, therefore the temperature rises.
Other recent studies, published in Nature and other leading journals, conclude that the sun’s radiant heat and solar radiation levels affect planetary warming and cloud formation more strongly than acknowledged by Global Warming alarmists. After all, why would natural forces that caused the climate to change in past centuries suddenly stop now? And how does man-made Global Warming explain why every planet in our solar system appears to be simultaneously warming up? Does this not suggest that Global Warming is a natural cycle as a result of the dynamic nature of the sun?
(Natural News) The political establishment has taken to bashing meat in its latest installment of Climate Propaganda 2019, with the Democratic contenders for the presidency all basically suggesting that it might be time for the government to restrict meat-eating in order to save the planet from climate change. And wouldn’t you know it, but none other than Al Gore stands to profit handsomely if they’re successful.
You won’t hear about any of this from the mainstream media, but Gore is currently the largest investor in “Beyond Meat,” a fake meat company that we earlier reported is peddling “vegan” food creations made from things like genetically-modified soybeans, monosodium glutamate (MSG), and various other health-destroying ingredients and chemicals.
If this meat demonization effort by the climate lunatics pans out the way they want it to, meat-eating Americans could be forced to either go vegetarian or substitute their traditional burgers with Beyond Meat varieties instead – which means Gore stands to make billions of dollars in profit from yet another ridiculous climate hoax.
It wasn’t enough for Gore to make millions off of his An Inconvenient Truth documentary, which is full of lies about polar bears dying off and ocean levels rising because people are driving cars powered by fossil fuels. Now, Gore wants to take away your steaks in the name of stopping global warming, and so do his Democrat buddies vying for the Oval Office.
“Al Gore is standing to rake in millions from a World Resources Institute meat consumption reduction report, a report that will certainly help boost profits for the meat substitute manufacturers – in which Gore just happens to be a big stakeholder,” one report explains.
100% organic essential oil sets now available for your home and personal care, including Rosemary, Oregano, Eucalyptus, Tea Tree, Clary Sage and more, all 100% organic and laboratory tested for safety. A multitude of uses, from stress reduction to topical first aid. See the complete listing here, and help support this news site.
“Al Gore, partner and advisor to Kleiner Perkins, Beyond Meat’s big investor, stands to haul in millions, should governments move to restrict real meat consumption and force citizens to consume the dubious substitutes and fakes.”
For more related news about the climate change hoax, be sure to check out ClimateScienceNews.com.
Al Gore also profited heavily from Obama’s “green energy” scams
Marc Morano from Climate Depot recently had the chance to sit down with Mark Steyn from Fox News to discuss Gore’s financial ties to the fake meat industry. During their conversation, Morano explained that Gore very well could become the world’s “post-meat billionaire,” should these Democrats somehow achieve their goal of forcing the entire world – excluding themselves, of course – to adopt a “plant-based” diet free of meat.
“It’s made up of 22 ingredients including bamboo and potato starch, and now it is the most successful IPO this year,” Morano stated about Beyond Meat. “And at the same time, Gore’s associates are writing reports condemning meat and linking eating it to climate (change). He is essentially lobbying for regulations that will enrich him once again.”
Morano’s “again” comment refers to shenanigans that Gore pulled during the Obama years, when 44 poured billions of taxpayer dollars into “green energy” firms, many of which ended up going kaput before anyone even knew where the money went.
As it turns out, Gore had an affiliation with some 14 different firms that received portions of Obama’s $2.5 billion “green stimulus,” which means Gore was basically handed taxpayer money for absolutely no good reason other than he’s a leftist crook.
“If a Democrat wins the White House, there is going to be a whole fake meat stimulus,” Morano warns, noting that the United Nations is already planning to implement a new climate agreement that will eventually lead to skyrocketing meat prices – meaning a windfall of ill-gotten gain for Gore and his fellow climate liars.
To learn more about how to grow your own food at home, including animals for meat, be sure to check out HomeGardeningNews.com.
Sources for this article include:
Published on Sep 25, 2011
Beating the climate drum again. The peddlers of the climate change ruse are getting desperate. Lamestream is now pushing low IQs onto climate. No mention of fluoride’s part in lowering IQ. No mention either of weather manipulation aka geoengineering. If you’re taken in by the propaganda you need to listen to the Australian Senator’s recent revelations. And check out the weather spin from NZ’s own Ministers for the environment. EWR
Children who experience extreme weather events before they’re born have lower IQs than those that don’t, a new report suggests.
The report from Global Health Alliance Australia laid bare the impacts climate change is having on health, AAP reports.
It looked at more than 100 pieces of research and policy analysis to work out how environmental conditions are affecting people’s health.
Global Health Alliance Australia executive director Misha Coleman was shocked by fact the research suggested an effect on children’s IQ.
Studies on the subject found evidence the change is due to stress hormones from the mother crossing into the placenta.
One study found specific effects in children that went through the 2011 Brisbane floods, which was part of a cluster of floods in Queensland from 2010 to 2011.
“It’s been estimated that those kids lost about 14 IQ points because of the stress their mothers went through,” Coleman told AAP.
The study also revealed higher temperatures and greenhouse gasses are leading to increased asthma attacks and allergies.
Coleman said sometimes it could be hard for people to understand the broader implications of climate change on health.
“During the Black Saturday fires for example, people know about how many people died in the fires,” she told AAP.
So… geoengineering is not conspiracy like Nick Smith said at one stage in Parliament ridiculing us all as conspiracy theorists (you can see him laughing in this video below … go to 4:49 mins). Note there are two subsequent videos on YT called Who in the World is Spraying? and Why in the World are they Spraying?
Then we have Amy-Adams outright admitting that geoengineering is in fact a scientific practice but ‘the NZ Government is not doing it’.
So which one is it then?
They can’t have it both ways.
The public need to wake up to the lies we are spun constantly. Now we in fact have the authorities telling us that they are considering employing geoengineering (as Amy-Adams alludes to) to combat climate change which we all now know is a big fat ruse anyway. (See here also). And then, as those of us with our eyes wide open know, they’ve already been doing this for a very long time as this well documented time line will show you…. whilst calling us, yes, conspiracy theorists.
Do you still believe these people?
If your government considers the health & well-being of NZ citizens and the environment a high priority, ask yourself why we have second highest child poverty in the the developed world? Why we can only swim in 40% of our rivers now? Why we have 43K homeless? It is simply not true.
And while we’re about it here’s what those ‘benign’ trails have been found to contain:
Aluminum Oxide Particles, Arsenic, Bacilli and Molds, Barium Salts, Barium Titanates, Cadmium, Calcium, Chromium, Desiccated Human Red Blood Cells, Ethylene Dibromide, Enterobacter Cloacal, Enterobacteriaceae, Human white Blood Cells-A (restrictor enzyme used in research labs to snip and combine DNA), Lead, Mercury, Methyl Aluminum, Mold Spores, Mycoplasma, Nano-Aluminum-Coated Fiberglass, Nitrogen Trifluoride, Known as CHAFF), Nickel, Polymer Fibers, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Florescens, Radioactive Cesium, Radio Active Thorium, Selenium, Serratia Marcscens, Sharp Titanium Shards, Silver, Streptomyces, Stronthium, Sub-Micron Particles, (Containing Live Biological Matter), Unidentified Bacteria, Uranium, Yellow Fungal Mycotoxins
Thanks to reader Lucille for the link to the first video below. It’s a must see on the climate change scam. The good Senator has cottoned on to the scam & is doing his best to expose it for what it is. As is the custom at any challenge of the lies, the audience raise the conspiracy ruse & the anti Semitic one as well. These are of course designed to lead the truth seeker away from the truth. It is why we are now facing full censorship of truth on the internet, with Google blocking truth sites. We also have book burning going on, libraries shutting, collections disappearing. The so called elite need a crisis to usher in their world government so exposing it for what it is makes a considerable dent in their credibility. As Mikhail Gobachev said, a New World Order is required to deal with the Climate Change crisis. Watch what happens to Senator Roberts & how he fares in politics from hereon in. He’s stepping outside the ‘instructions’ & boundaries politicians must stay within if they wish to remain in politics that is.
Further down is an additional video in which Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner is interviewed on radio about his experience. He was former IPCC Chair for the Sea Level committee however his advice was ignored. He explains about the sea levels & as in the first video the false data that accompanies the whole scam.
Published on Nov 7, 2016
Published on Jul 22, 2019
Published on Jun 19, 2019
Alan Jones and Peta Credlin expose the lies being promoted by the by the IPCC. Former IPCC Chair for the Sea Level committee Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner opens up to Alan Jones and completely spills the beans on how the world is being lied to by the UN and the climate change activists. Solar activity is currently the key contributor to any climate variation. Copyright © Jones & Co, SkyNews, 2GB
The purpose of the Petition Project is to demonstrate that the claim of “settled science” and an overwhelming “consensus” in favor of the hypothesis of human-caused global warming and consequent climatological damage is wrong. No such consensus or settled science exists. As indicated by the petition text and signatory list, a very large number of American scientists reject this hypothesis.
Publicists at the United Nations, Mr. Al Gore, and their supporters frequently claim that only a few “skeptics” remain – skeptics who are still unconvinced about the existence of a catastrophic human-caused global warming emergency.
It is evident that 31,487 Americans with university degrees in science – including 9,029 PhDs, are not “a few.” Moreover, from the clear and strong petition statement that they have signed, it is evident that these 31,487 American scientists are not “skeptics.”
These scientists are instead convinced that the human-caused global warming hypothesis is without scientific validity and that government action on the basis of this hypothesis would unnecessarily and counter productively damage both human prosperity and the natural environment of the Earth.
See info at the link below:
Summary of Peer Reviewed Research:
“…help monitor and inform decision about global warming” … the old globalist go to for doing just about anything they want & the gullible trusting public as always fall for it hook line & sinker. And as for the ‘make it rain’ title, well some of us know they’ve been making it rain & weaponizing weather for quite some time now.
Why ever else would DARPA have their fingers in this pie?
“Rocket Lab has already launched satellites for US defence agency Darpa and the US Air Force this year….
Earlier, Beck said most defence technologies were “dual use”. Technologies that had come out of defence spending, including the internet, GPS and imaging systems that can help monitor and inform decision about global warming all gelled with his company’s motto that “We go into space to improve life on Earth.” “
from the NZ Herald
Rocket Lab’s “Make it Rain” launch has successfully liftoff, with its Electron now orbital.
The mission is the company’s seventh Electron launch and third for 2019.
Pfft!! Sorry Stuff but this is where your fake propaganda belongs …
You think we are all mentally challenged.
My two attempts at writing to the govt/corporation on geoengineering around 5 years ago received firstly a denial ‘nothing doing’, CONSPIRACY, you’re dreaming pretty much … the next, a year or two later … ‘geoengineering is a science blah blah blah & we may need to use it to mitigate global warning’ … just like their corporate-media-arm Stuff says below here …. and that flip flop loses you people any tiny shred of credibility you may have had …
Read Stuff / Nelson Mail’s piece at thecontrail.com on the need for geoengineering. Might provide you with a laugh for the day…
Please look at flu shot in ‘categories’ (left of page) for other articles on this. It is a complete scam exposed by whistle blowers. Then there are the injuries.
(Natural News) A bombshell new scientific study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) finds that people who receive flu shots emit 630% more flu virus particles into the air, compared to non-vaccinated individuals. In effect, this finding documents evidence that flu vaccines spread the flu, and that so-called “herd immunity” is a medical hoax because “the herd” is actually transformed into carriers and spreaders of influenza.
The bombshell finding is documented in a study entitled Infectious virus in exhaled breath of symptomatic seasonal influenza cases from a college community. The study authors are Jing Yan, Michael Grantham, Jovan Pantelic, P. Jacob Bueno de Mesquita, Barbara Albert, Fengjie Liu, Sheryl Ehrman, Donald K. Milton and EMIT Consortium.
Details of this bombshell study have been revealed by Sayer Ji at Green Med Info, a site that’s rapidly becoming one of the world’s most authoritative sources on intelligent analysis of real science. Green Med Info has published 500 studies that document the adverse effects (and injury) of vaccines. Find that extensive list at this link.
This article is from July 2013! The word has been out for some time with other whistleblowers weighing in (search our articles) and still this is being pushed hard. A few days ago we had warnings about Australia’s intentions for pre teen kids including boys. No person with the responsibility this woman had is going to risk their career for no reason. Everything to lose and nothing to gain (except as she says, a clear conscience). Read the evidence.
Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines.
Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia. Her speech, which was originally intended to promote the benefits of the vaccines, took a 180-degree turn when she chose instead to clean her conscience about the deadly vaccines so she “could sleep at night”. The following is an excerpt from a story by Sarah Cain:
“Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all HPV infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle. All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds. So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects from Gardasil™ alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions. At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines. The reported side effects include Guillian Barré Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently — sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation. Parents are usually not made aware of these risks. Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night. ’About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have HPV at some stage of their life,’ Harper says. ’Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.’”
Although these two vaccines are marketed as protection against cervical cancer, this claim is purely hypothetical. Studies have proven “there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless. In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. From the manufacturers own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about about the same as the chance of her being struck by a meteorite.”
UPDATE #1: Since coming forward with the truth about the devastating consequences of the HPV vaccine, Dr. Harper has been victim of a relentless campaign attempting to discredit the validity of her claims. Harper was even misquoted by British tabloid The Sunday Express which printed a false story loaded with fabricated quotations attributed to Harper. In an interview with The Guardian, Harper makes it very clear about what exactly she said in order to protect herself from a potential lawsuit. In an interview with CBS NEWS, Harper clarifies her position, and once again makes it crystal clear just how devastating this vaccine can be: “If we vaccinate 11 year olds and the protection doesn’t last … we’ve put them at harm from side effects, small but real, for no benefit,” says Dr. Harper. “The benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.” She also says that enough serious side effects have been reported after Gardasil use that the vaccine could prove riskier than the cervical cancer it purports to prevent. Cervical cancer is usually entirely curable when detected early through normal Pap screenings.
Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is “Dead Wrong”.
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.
The 2015 speech by Prof Giaever is here;
See our Climate pages for further evidence (main menu) and hear others who speak in a similar vein to this man. There is a petition going in fact, signed by thousands of scientists who also disagree with the Climate scam. People aren’t arguing the weather’s not changed … but if you have studied the practice of geoengineering, you’ll know that the weather is being manipulated. And has been for many decades. All documented and patented as well.
PHOTO credit: with thanks Pixabay
This is a must to research. Why doubt the anti vaccine folks any further when a whistle blower tells it like it is? This particular vaccine has serious repercussions which you can see prolifically documented if you just search Youtube for reactions to it.
Dr. Diane Harper was a leading expert responsible for the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies which secured the approval of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines, Gardasil™ and Cervarix™. Dr. Harper also authored many of the published, scholarly papers about the vaccines. She is now the latest in a long string of experts who are pressing the red alert button on the devastating consequences and irrelevancy of these vaccines. Dr. Harper made her surprising confession at the 4th International Conference on Vaccination which took place in Reston, Virginia.
(NaturalNews) Do you think gluten-free foods are always healthy and wholesome? Think again: many of them are highly processed junk foods loaded with GMOs and MSG.
I’ve just posted a new video exposing the gluten-free fraud by reviewing a few off-the-shelf gluten-free products. As the video reveals, some of the products are made with hidden forms of MSG and genetically modified ingredients. But others are truly wholesome or even labeled Non-GMO Project Verified.
The lesson here is simple: Just because some food product claims to be “gluten-free” doesn’t mean it’s good for you. In fact, many gluten-free products are no healthier than processed junk foods. You’d be far better off eating organic wheat products with gluten than consuming processed gluten-free junk food loaded with GMOs, glyphosate, pesticides and MSG.
Gluten may not even be your problem in the first place… it’s probably glyphosate
On the topic of glyphosate, by the way, it is my belief that many people who mistakenly think they’re allergic to gluten are actually being poisoned by the glyphosate pesticide that’s commonly sprayed on wheat harvests as a drying agent.
Non-organic wheat is almost universally contaminated with glyphosate, a cancer-causing weed killer chemical that permeates the wheat berries and persists in wheat flour. If you are eating non-organic breads, pastries, sandwich buns or even bagels, you’re eating glyphosate.
Please like our FB page &/or follow our blog, and do spread the word on all the untruths we have been told!
From Stuff.co.nz by Richard Meadows : “A banking insider says some New Zealand banks made up to $1.5 million a day manipulating inter-bank interest rates.
The anonymous source says there was widespread rigging of the benchmark inter-bank BKBM rate, mirroring Europe’s Libor (London Inter-bank Offered Rate) scandal that rocked markets worldwide.
He says he wanted to blow the whistle on what he claimed may be the biggest and longest-running financial scam in New Zealand history.
Sources claim manipulation in New Zealand dated from the 1990s…
A spokesman for a New Zealand banking industry body said no misconduct issues had ever been identified, but declined to explain why the system has now been reformed…
The whistleblower claimed the behaviour was endemic in several banks during the 2000s, and had only been reined-in during recent years…
Banks have self-regulated through NZFMA, an industry body that oversees BKBM.
Reforms were carried out in 2007, but the group has declined Fairfax Media requests to explain why.
No regulators have ever investigated, although the FMA says it did a “temperature check” on recent data…”
I’m John Coleman and the name of this presentation is ‘There is No Significant Global Warming’. And I’m the guy that is just doggone sure of that. Now you may think that I’m just a paid off shill, Big Oil or something of that sort. No, no, no, no … they’ve never given me a nickel. I’m a television weather caster with 60 years experience … a meteorologist. I was the first weather man on Good Morning America, and the man who founded the weather channel, and this is my accomplishment… Broadcast Meteorologist of the Year, from the American Meteorological Society of which I was a professional member for many years. I finally quit the AMS when it became very clear to me that the politics had gotten in the way of the science and it was time to talk about something else. Now did we have a Winter or what in 2013, 14, oh man did we ever? When I called for my brother in Ohio, his wife said he wasn’t coming in from shoveling the snow to talk to some guy in California. How could you talk global warming when it was the coldest, bitterest, snowiest winter in 30 years which it was across the United States, and it would take a lot of gall to put out a statement as our NOAA, National, Oceanic and Atmospheric agency did, claiming that 2013 was the warmest year … I mean it is sheer silliness, it is manipulation of the data. Now look, let’s get something clear right from the beginning. I love this planet earth. I’ve been a citizen of this earth now for darn near 80 years, and it’s all I got. If I thought that we, mankind, were damaging this beautiful little sphere, this blue marble on which we live, I would be terrified, and give every ounce of energy to stop what we were doing. But I have studied the issues of so-called global warming, or now they call it climate change since the warming has stopped. I have studied the issues as carefully & completely as a good scientist can, and reached an absolute firm conclusion that there is no global warming. Now this earth, it’s spinning around the sun at 17,000 miles per hour. It is travelling with the sun, in our little spiral, off the Milky Way Galaxy, at over 100,000 miles an hour, and that galaxy is flying out in the universe, as the big bang continues to expand the universe, and we are all travelling very very fast. What a ride. The earth has been travelling for four and a half billion years, and as best I can tell it’s going to stay just fine for another four billion years, but wait a minute. During that period we have had Ice Ages, and we have had inter-glacial periods, and we’re going to continue to have those natural variations in climate, but man-made climate change? I’m sure it’s not going to happen. That’s why I sent out this Tweet today. This Tweet went out to Al Gore, it went out to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the United Nations, to the Seierra Club, to the Democratic Party National Committee. And what it said is, where is your so called global warming, because if you chart the temperatures, you can go back into the ‘70s and come up to today, and there’s almost no warming, I mean less than one degree warming since 1978, and absolutely no warming since 1998! What kind of deal is that? Well I’ll tell you what kind of deal it is. It’s the kind of deal that’s full of silliness if you’re promoting climate change and global warming. We are in one of the most stable and beautiful periods of earth’s climate you could hope for. And look at the stark contrast between the spaghetti of the many mottles of atmospheric warming created by various people who’ve gotten tens of millions of dollars of federal grant money and worked for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change … and there’s the average of all their models, and then here’s the real temperatures as measured both on earth and with our satellites, and folks, it’s just not happening. That’s why I posted on Facebook, this memo today, to the scientists and organizations that take that 4.7 billion dollars a year tax money to continue your so called global warming research, and I say to them, it’s bad science. Ladies and gentlemen, please cease and desist that global warming and climate change scare campaign, it’s harmful to the continued advancement of our civilization. The government actions to counter so called carbon pollution, have already raised the cost of food, electricity and fuel by an average of thousand dollars a year for the average American family of four and, the 4.7 billion dollars of our tax money a year being issued to you and your organizations is funding a wide range of meaningless studies based on this bad science that says that carbon dioxide is causing warming. That money could be productively spent on energy research, including thorium and other new energy sources. Your manipulated climate computer models have dramatically failed both in temperature predictions and their predictive warming signatures. Please admit your errors, it’s time to put principles above personal wealth and status and help restore basic scientific principles to climate research. So I posted the memo, I sent the tweet. I know you are highly skeptical of what I’m saying, how can you believe me when you see this constant stream of global warming news reports day after day, year after year, printed on the internet sites, in all the newspapers, they still print with ink on paper and roll it up and throw it on your driveway… send it in a magazine … and it’s full of this stuff … even our government, our National Oceanographic Atmospheric Agency of the Federal government has established websites to promote climate change, and of course the New York Times it’s been reading that all along … and that’s the power of money. That four point seven billion dollars a year is buying all of this bogus research that is leading to all of these bogus reports. So let me just give you the hard cold facts. I showed you this when I tweeted it … there isn’t any warming going on, there hasn’t been …. Nothing significant is happening, oh we have extreme natural variations in temperature, that’s a hard cold fact, but this recent warming, it’s no different than the warming that’s occurred many times before naturally. We had a medieval optimum when the Roman Empire flourished, and we had the little Ice Age when times were very tough. This little warming we have now? It’s no big deal, it’s no big deal. Now you want to talk about big deals … this is a hard cold fact, from the ice cores, we have determined that we have vacillated on earth between extreme ice ages and these beautiful inter glacial periods of warming weather, and we live in the most recent of these inter glacial periods, we’ve been in it for 12,000 years, probably have another 10, 12,000 years to go before the next ice age comes on naturally, and can we cope with that? Now you hear about the ice melting at the North Pole. What ice melted at the North Pole? It got pretty low in 2007 but this is the last bunch of years since we’ve had satellite observation, about 35 years, and here’s where the ice is now and it’s no big deal. And those polar bears, there are more polar bears living today than have been alive any time since we’ve been counting them, and they’re living all around the North Pole in 19 populations, they’re doing just fine, that’s a hard cold fact. How about the South Pole, well our South Pole as I record this is in Summer time so the ice melt is near the peak for the season, there’s more ice there than above average, it’s near an all time high. Oh, but the water is rising! Along the coast. Is that right? Well it’s rising at about the rate of 6 inches per hundred years as part of this interglacial period. I mean when North America was covered in a four hundred foot thick ice core at the end of the last ice age the oceans were low and then the ice melted and of course the oceans have risen but that rise has been gentle and it’s not important. And then, oh, the super storms … we didn’t have a hurricane hit the US in 2013, the year before only a meager effort and that so called super storm Sandy, it was no big deal as hurricanes go, it didn’t compare with Katrina, didn’t compare with Andrew, and neither of those compared with the Galveston hurricane of 1900, long before man had any influence on climate. Oh the tornadoes, how about those tornadoes, well here’s the chart of tornadoes, strong tornadoes have been diminishing, we now have so many good radars, everybody’s taking pictures with their phones, we see every tornado it seems that form, but folks, there are fewer, and less strong. And drought, well we had a big drought in Texas that vanished, now we have a big drought in California getting a lot of publicity. If you look at the records California falls into drought about once every 11 or 12 years, then we get an El Nino and California gets the rain, comes out of the drought, I mean we’ve got 40 million people living in a desert, of course they’re going to have a water problem, so what, it’s natural, it’s not man made and it comes and it goes, it takes care of itself. Heat waves, what heat waves? We haven’t had a killer heat wave since the ‘50s, so I’ve brought all of these hard cold facts and presented them to you, and compared them to what you read in the press, what you hear on the air, what the networks tout and you say, man what a difference between reality and what’s there. Does Coleman know his reality? You bet I do folks, I study it every day.
But how did this strange strange bad science, how did this global warming, climate change, this crisis, how did it get started? Well that story I’m going to tell you today, that story begins with this great scientist, a man named Roger Revelle who was a graduate of the University of California at Berkley, in Oceanography in 1950, who then served in the Navy during World War II, then became director of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and who led research on the environmental impact of the atomic tests on those atolls out in the Pacific following World War II, both atmospheric & ocean impact, as that was coming to an end, he had a greatly grown the Scripps Oceanographic Institution from an isolated small organization to a huge professional organization with many ships and hundreds of employees, it became clear he had to have something new to work on, and that’s when he decided that something had to give. So he hired this man, Hans Seuss, a Professor from the University of Chicago who had done studies on the effect of carbon on the atmosphere, and Revelle thought maybe there was something to that, so he and Seuss did a research paper & they put it out, in which they asked the question, is mankind’s burning of fossil fuel, our coal and our stokers that were heating our homes, the oil in our cars, the fuel, old fashioned gasoline and old fashioned cars, was all of that creating a climate issue? That was the 1950s folks. And the world was pretty much caught in a smog. I remember as a boy, most of you are probably too young to remember, you choked in the smog that hung over your towns or winter months when those coal burning stokers were going and the cars were just spewing out ash, it was ugly. We were burning old fashioned untreated fuel in old fashioned cars. Well that was the beginning, that paper that Seuss & Revelle put out, is actually the paper that started the global warming frenzy. Oh man did they start something. And Revelle then, he became a powerful man, on the basis of that, the science was used all over the world by other scientists, and he started campaigning to establish a campus at the University of California, co located with his Scripps Oceanographic Institution at California. That was a big darn deal. Well guess what happened? It was located there but something happened. Revelle suffered the greatest defeat of his life. He had campaigned to get that university there & thought he’d be its first Chancellor. But the politics back fired on him. And he wasn’t named Chancellor of that university and he was hurt. So what did he do? He suddenly made a big move. He changed his life. He packed up and went to Harvard where he started the Centre for Population Studies. So there he was in Boston in 1967. Now what does this have to do with the global warming story? This is what it has to do with it. That first year, one of his students was this young man, Al Gore. The only science class Al Gore ever took. Revelle didn’t remember having him in class, but Al Gore who got a D in the course was highly impressed. He was the son of a politician out of Tennessee and he used what he learned there to start his global warming campaign. He wrote a book called Earth in the Balance, he ran for the US Senate, he claimed that the earth was being challenged by the burning of fossil fuels and it got him elected to the US Senate, and there in the Senate he conducted hearings, bringing in scientists and spreading the scare of global warming, & that’s when the money began to flow to the government research, and this was the booby trap, because once billions of dollars of government funding was going out to these organizations and universities & research groups from across the nation, and they had this back that global warming claim that Al Gore was promoting with their research, the research began to pile up, and if you were a young scientist you didn’t have a choice, you couldn’t put out a research paper that said, oh, what warming? You’d be out of a job, you’d lose your car, your family would be walking on the streets. No you had to support it. Al Gore had taken Revelle and Seuss’s research paper & used it to start the global warming campaign. Now what did Al Gore say? He said Roger Revelle is my mentor, he’s my hero … he’s the man who spread the alarm. Well there’s another man who picked that up. This man, Maurice Strong. Maurice had become a Democrat at the United Nations. In 1972, he had a conference in Stockholm on the environment and his whole goal was for one world government, & he used that impetus of global warming scare, at that Stockholm conference to start the initiative that set up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Now we had the US government and the United Nations both promoting climate change, & it all came from that Revelle Seuss paper and the research that followed and the dollars that were now flowing and man it was under way big time. And so the IPPC had scientists and bureaucrats & politicians from throughout the world. It had the WWF, the Sierra Club, all the environmentalists, and they all got together and they voted that global warming was for real. Well I’ve got to tell you something, you don’t sell science by a vote, it’s not a political issue, it’s not a vote, it’s science. Ah but never mind they put out their reports and they spent a lot of time telling us how we were destroying planet earth & they had fancy meetings in tropical locations throughout the world, and the scientists who supported global warming, paid vacation trips to these big meetings, & got to write these books and have their names and their careers and man it was a big deal. And what did Al Gore do? Well he wrote a second book about global warming called, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, and we all know what became of that. His liberal friends in Hollywood turned that into a documentary, a sci fi documentary I might add, all about global warming, and they voted themselves an Oscar, best documentary film of the year in 2007, and then they turned around and Al Gore stood behind the IPCC President & they got the Nobel Peace prize. All for scaring us about global warming. So, Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth became an absolute mainstay in American schools… how many times did you see it in school? Over and over again, and the global warming frenzy had truly reached its peak when all of that happened. Well what happened with this man, Roger Revelle who had started it all, the great scientist? Well he kind of lost interest in this Population Study Centre at Harvard and missed San Diego I guess and the beautiful Sthn California climate and he swallowed hard for his defeat there and he came back to the University of California San Diego as a Professor and there, there he wrote these letters and I want you to look at them. The first one goes from his desk to US Congressman, Tim Worth, quote, ‘We should be careful not to arouse too much alarm about the rate and amount of warming before it becomes clear’ and he wrote another letter here to Congressman Tim Bates, ‘Most scientists familiar with the subject are not yet willing to bet that climate this year is the result of greenhouse warming. As you very well know, climate is highly variable year to year. The causes of these variations are not at all well understood. My own personal belief is that we should wait another 10-20 years to really be convinced that the green house is going to be important for human beings and in positive and negative ways. So there it was, the man who had started the global warming campaign had put up the flag of warning. ‘Hey folks, this may not be for real, caution, caution’. Well he even wrote an article that was published in a new science magazine called Cosmos. And he teamed with a Professor Ted Singer to write that article, and that article was called, ‘What to do about Greenhouse Warming: Look Before You Leap’. And the article concluded and I quote; ‘the scientific basis for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time’. Wow. The man who had started it? Well how did Al Gore react to that? Well he said, ‘I’ve made up my mind, Revelle is now senile, pay no attention, the debate is over’ and you’ve been hearing that now for 20 years. Al Gore won’t debate anybody and he claims it’s for real. Well we lost Revelle, he passed away of a heart attack in 1991. And after he died his family joined with the people at Scripps to make him the father of global warming. They rejected his denial and so did the UN and IPCC. But Dr Singer, he was made to be the scapegoat for it all. They said that he had caused it. Well I finally was able to interview Dr Singer about this controversy. ‘Dr Singer what was Roger Revelle’s view of carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas when you co authored that Cosmos article back in 1990?’ Reply: ‘he was very relaxed about it… he basically looked at this as a grandeur physical experiment … after he and his collaborators like David Keeling found that CO2 was in fact increasing in the atmosphere, he and his colleagues were wondering if it would have any impact on climate. He wasn’t about to make any judgement on the matter until the data were in. of course at that time, by 1990 we had about more than 10 years worth of satellite data & the satellites didn’t show any appreciable warming & this is what actually set off my own thinking on the matter. I wondered why; what was going on? After all Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, it’s increasing. There’s no question about that. Where is the warming? Well it turns out that the atmosphere is much more complicated than the climate models believed, and the warming is offset probably by a kind of negative feedback that comes from clouds and water vapour in the atmosphere. Are you saying that back in 1990 that Revelle was somewhat regretful of the excitement that he had caused about global warming? Ah Revelle, um at that time, had written some letters to his Congressmen and to Senator Worth, telling them to calm down, not get excited about it, but wait and see what would happen to the climate. In other words he was telling them, don’t assume that things are going to warm up just because the models say so. He was actually very skeptical of climate models, much moreso than I was. I was always more optimistic hoping that they would improve enough so they could really simulate what’s going on in the atmosphere. Revelle had not much faith in models. Well since that time many people have said, that you were the one that manipulated Revelle, that you kind of calmed him down or changed his feelings in the way you put that article together; that Gore said he was a senile old man when you co authored that paper, and that therefore you took your position on CO2 and more or less assigned it to Revelle and they put a lot of blame on you. Well that’s absolutely untrue. First of all if you knew Revelle, you would know that he was sharp right to the very very end and you could not change his mind … he knew what he was doing all the time. And furthermore we have written proof. We have the letters he wrote to his Congressman and the Senator, we also have an interview in Omni magazine, so there’s plenty of evidence to show that he was quite independent minded, and that he didn’t believe in global warming until the day they would show him a warming and by 1990 they really weren’t, the satellite data were not showing the warming. Did you and Revelle talk about Gore at all? Actually no we never did come to think of it. We only discussed the science. Revelle’s politics were very different from mine. He was a supporter of Gore. He was a Liberal Democrat by inclination and I think and every other way. But when it came to science, we completely agreed.
The interview that I had with Dr Singer, now he’s not the only scientist, please understand this, who questions this global warming frenzy. This climate change scare. In ****fact there are 9,000 PHDs have signed a petition denying that CO2 is causing global warming. There’s 31,000 scientists in total who have signed that petition. There is a whole organization of them. A huge group from NASA recently wrote to the UN and to the US Congress saying please stop the global warming scare. There is a strong movement opposed to global warming. You don’t hear about it in the media because the media has that Al Gore liberal bias so it becomes very tough. And at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, they gave Al Gore the first Roger Revelle award … in recognition of his environmental work.
‘We’re honoured tonight at Scripps Institute of Oceanography … he was given an award in recognition of his environmental work, KUSI Tom Jordan is live in La Hoya with more on that … Tom, Al Gore was the first ever recipient of the Roger Revelle prize here at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, honoured tonight for his work in environmental preservation. A rousing welcome for a man continuing his continuing campaign on environmental awareness and protection. Former Vice President Al Gore being honoured for his efforts with the first ever Roger Revelle prize. (Gore) ‘I want to express my very deep & genuine gratitude for this honour…. ‘
The award presented at this dinner marking the 100th birthday of the late Roger Revelle who headed Scripps Institute of Oceanography from 1958 to 1964. Gore studied under Revelle at Harvard University in the 1960s and credits him with igniting his passion on the environment.
(Gore) ‘As a former student … still a student, trying to learn, but still inspired by a great teacher, who was a great scientist and a great man.’
Roger Revelle’s work back in the 1960s was at the time considered revolutionary. Today many scientists consider that work almost prophetic.
And at that time they wrote a short report and we were told it was a very short report saying that climate change is becoming an issue, the earth is heating up, and therefore something needs to be done about that.
Al Gore says he was deeply moved by Revelle’s early work, he now considered at the forefront of the global warming movement. A Nobel Peace Prize winner, an Oscar winning documentarian all from his work on the environment. Now he adds a new distinguished & personal honour to that list.
(Gore) I am deeply deeply grateful.
And tonight’s celebration was part of 3 days of celebrating the life of Roger Revelle. He would have been 100 years old tomorrow. We’re live in La Hoya, I’m Tom Jordan KUSI News. Thanks Tom, John Coleman believes there is no significant man-made global warming & he travels the nation speaking on the topic. John has some insights now on Roger Revelle’s scientific research and the effect that it had on Al Gore.
(Coleman) …. Well Revelle was a powerful man, a noteworthy scientist and a significant force here in San Diego in the 1950s. There’s no doubt that he’s largely responsible for the high status of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography in its field, and for locating the University of California at San Diego, and UCSD at La Hoya.
While serving as Director at Scripps Institute of Oceanography, Revelle & one of his researchers wrote the first modern scientific paper that linked carbon dioxide released into the air from the burning of fossil fuels & the greenhouse effect and the warming of temperatures. Well this triggered an avalanche of research that eventually became the impetus behind the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change & the entire global warming movement. In the 1960s Revelle moved to Harvard to establish a center for population studies. This is where Prof Revelle encountered student Albert Gore. He involved Gore & his classmates in the tabulating of data from a carbon dioxide study. Gore was so impressed he wrote about it in his 1992 book, ‘Earth in the Balance’ that became the story for the movie ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, the Oscar & the Nobel Peace Prize, and some people say one hundred million dollars all came from that. There is no doubt Roger Revelle had a major impact on Vice President Gore’s life.
(Coleman) … there’s a twist. In 1988 Roger Revelle was having second thoughts about whether carbon dioxide was a significant greenhouse gas … he wrote letters to Congressmen about it. And in 1991 he co authored a report for the new science magazine, Cosmos in which he expressed his strong doubts about global warming and urged more research before any remedial action was taken.
(News again) At that point Mr Gore pronounced Revelle senile & refused to debate global warming. He continues to refuse to debate. Many offers of thousands of dollars have been made for debate but he refuses. Today sequestered the media to set forth rules, no questions, no interviews.
(Coleman) I have learned that in 1991 Roger Revelle made what was his final speech at the high powered very private summer enclave of powerful men and politicians from Bohemian Grove in Nthn California. There he apologized for his research, for sending so man people in the wrong direction on global warming. And he worried about the political fallout from the UN IPCC and Al Gore. A man named Don Michael Schmedman who lives in the San Francisco area was there that day. And he remembers the Revelle speech very well. He has told me about it in some detail. So think of the irony today. Al Gore received the first Roger Revelle award honouring the man who sent him on his global warming campaign. But Revelle had realized that it was a false alarm and that the science was flawed before he died.
(Coleman) … Revelle died of a heart attack in 1991. it would be interesting to know that if he had lived would he be approving of the award that was given tonight? Or perhaps would he be joining me at the international conference of global warming skeptics in New York next week. If you want to read the article on global warming that I have written you can go to KUSI dot com, click on Coleman’s corner.
This is really interesting. We haven’t heard this information at all before.
Well I’ve done a lot of digging over the last year or two to find all of this, and really fascinated me when I stumbled across the Bohemian Grove speech … it’s not documented anywhere.
This is the first time your orbits have crossed, you and Al Gore. You’re both in the same city for 24 hours and we couldn’t get the two of you to meet.
Well Mr Gore of course is the former Vice President, he’s the man who got 52 million votes for President, served very honourably as a politician, I think he would have little regard for me.
You’d like to debate him wouldn’t you?
Well sure I’d love to debate him, but you understand, this isn’t political, I’m a journalist, a meteorologist, my interest is strictly in the science.
Thank you John.
So that’s the report, and I’m sure you’re wondering why I have I never heard of all this before? Why hasn’t the media full of it? Why do I keep hearing about global warming and its threat to our civilization? Well it’s 4.7 billion dollars a year of our tax money, and that’s the power of money. Now everything I’ve had in this report is posted, including the complete interview with the Dr Singer. You only saw part of that interview. And a lot of other material is posted on my Coleman’s Corner website at KUSI dot com. Now I’d be delighted to have you look there. I’m also a regular reader of a site called ‘What’s up with that?’ where my friend Anthony Watts hosts any number of skeptical papers on global warming, the research flows there on a daily basis. Now what’s going to defeat this global warming scare? It’s like David and Goliath. I don’t think we can defeat $4.7 billion, the Democrat Party, the UN & the Sierra Club and the Wildlife Federation and all of them. They just claim that we’re deniers and old goats and they think we’re bought and paid for by the big oil companies which we are not, we don’t have anything to do with them, but I don’t think we can defeat them. What’s going to defeat them? Time. A few more bitterly cold winters. A turn towards a colder climate. When the global warming fails to materialize in time, people will begin to believe and I have noted that recent gallup polls show that more and more people are saying, global warming that’s not the big deal. We got a lot of big deals going on, you know employment, jobs, govt too big, that sort of thing. The list of their concerns is very interesting. Those are on it. The global warming’s down toward the bottom of the list.