Tag Archives: Safety

More headlines

ATTENTION diabetics: These 3 popular spices can help manage your blood sugar

NZ DOCTORS FACING NZ MEDICAL CNCL: PLEASE SUPPORT

“Can you say to the regulator, I guarantee the V is safe for kids?”

Useful templates regarding the CV VX

Top Causes of Autoimmune Disease and 3 Natural Tips for Reversing It

NZ’s Medsafe has belatedly published a summary of some of the outstanding safety and efficacy information about the Pfizer jab

From NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey

On 3 June Medsafe belatedly published a summary of some of the outstanding safety and efficacy Information about the Pfizer jab. This important information should be included in ALL informed consent conversations and ALL employer/ employee health and safety discussions https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/…/Spotlight-on-Comirnaty…NB what they still don’t say is that the benefit/risk assessment required for s23(1) considers mainly administrative type Information and does NOT include assessment of product safety, integrity or efficacy (that is why this process was only available for the restricted treatment of a limited number of patients until the govt passed an emergency law on 19 May 2021 to retrospectively validate this and a few other novel medicines which had incomplete safety testing).

EWR Note: for the FDA’s list of more than thirty possible side effects also not included in information supplied in NZ go to this link, at page 17.

Summarised below:

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION
This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US:

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis, Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy, Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes, Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,
Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain, Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,Vaccine enhanced disease.

Photo credit: pixabay.com

Have you recently received a CV 19 VX in NZ? Please consider reporting any adverse reactions, you don’t need a Dr to do it for you

The Health Forum NZ fb page

PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS AND SEND IT TO EVERYONE YOU COME ACROSS WHO IS SPEAKING OF ANY KIND OF ADVERSE REACTION TO THE Covid 19 vaccination in New Zealand.

Have you recently received a Covid 19 vaccination in New Zealand? Have you experienced a reaction to your vaccination; or developed a new medical condition in the weeks after your vaccination?
Has someone you know, received the covid 19 vaccination and passed away suddenly and unexpectedly in the weeks following the vaccination? All of these events may potentially be linked in some way with the vaccination.
In New Zealand we have a voluntary reporting system for vaccine adverse events. It is called CARM or the Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring. Less than 5% of all injuries and reactions are ever reported to this system.
In New Zealand the Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine has only PROVISIONAL CONSENT for use. There are still 58 provisions for which Medsafe requires further information from Pfizer. Many of these conditions relate to safety, potential adverse reactions and dangers; and vaccine purity questions. It is very important that ALL adverse reactions to this new vaccine are reported for safety monitoring.
There is no medium and long term safety data for this vaccine. Safety trials are not due to be completed for another two years.
Reporting adverse reactions is a vital part of building a clear picture of immediate and potential risks for this novel vaccine.
If YOU have a reaction after your vaccination it is also VITAL for YOU to report your reaction. If there is a longer term decline in your health, you will be expected to apply to ACC for financial support. If you have not reported your original vaccine reaction, you will be at a significant disadvantage.
YOU CAN REPORT YOUR REACTION YOURSELF ONLINE. YOU DO NOT NEED A DOCTOR TO AGREE TO DO IT FOR YOU.

Please report your Adverse reaction to CARM online at:
https://nzphvc.otago.ac.nz/reporting/

We also have a New Zealand Citizens database, created by lawyer Sue Grey, in response to her awareness of under reporting to CARM. This confidential data base builds a community wide picture of sickness, injury or deaths post Covid 19 vaccination in New Zealand. After reporting to CARM, please also complete an online report to this Citizens data base at:
www.kti.org.nz
https://kti.org.nz/?cat=27

Please help to keep other New Zealanders safe by reporting your reactions, and allowing more accurate data collection for safety monitoring.

Photo: pixabay.com

The question of safety for NZers navigating the waters of vaccine warfare

C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand

My inbox every day fills with New Zealanders who are navigating the waters of vaccine warfare within the confines of their own family.
This morning I comforted a client who is literally crying with anxiety over the choices she and her family face around Covid vaccination. I receive messages from workers whose jobs are at risk because they do not believe the “safe and effective” messaging of our Government….and they want to wait longer to watch before deciding to have the vaccine (or not). Educated, scientifically minded, research focussed, New Zealanders are deciding the Covid vaccine is not for them (despite having received the full childhood schedule of vaccines). They are rewarded with derision, isolation within their family and peer group, and God forbid the dagger through the heart….labelled an “Anti-Vaxxer” (seemingly akin to being labelled the Anti-Christ). Top of their concern, is the question of safety…even more so than the still unanswered question of efficacy.

If YOU are one of these New Zealanders rapidly being assigned a second class citizen status because of your informed consent decision to decline Covid vaccination…PLEASE watch this (long) video. I don’t usually post much from Del Bigtree, but I do watch his video’s. His research is impressive…..his voice (loud and booming) is equally impressive! Watch this video….share it with those you love, who doubt your sanity for daring to question the “safe and effective”, “safe and effective”, “safe and effective” message beamed from every Government platform. In this video you will see actual footage from the Global Vaccine Safety Summit December 2019. This is a WHO gathering, bringing together eminent vaccine experts from around the world. When you have waded through 1 and a half hours of jaw dropping material, you may well feel shaken to the core about complete lack of science and research verifying the SAFETY of all the vaccines you have previously said yes to. While we are anxious about the “rushed” nature of Covid vaccination….it is apparent from these world experts, that we would be well to stop, start and question the safety of ALL the vaccines many so unquestioningly accept from their trusted doctors.

00:03:47 SAFETY IS THE BIGGEST ISSUE Prof. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project discusses the biggest issue surrounding growing vaccine hesitancy worldwide. (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:08:00 HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ARE QUESTIONING VACCINE SAFETY Prof. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project describes a ‘very wobbly health professional front line that is starting to question the safety of vaccines.’ (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:10:07 HOW MUCH TRAINING DO DOCTORS HAVE ON VACCINES? Prof. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project reports how little training doctors receive on vaccines at the W.H.O.’s Global Vaccine Safety Summit. (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:13:49 W.H.O. ADMITS IT’S NOT VACCINE “MISINFORMATION” Prof. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project admits the biggest problem with vaccine skepticism online is that ‘a lot of it is not misinformation’ and that there is ‘a lot of ambiguity in the safety field.’ (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:16:54 WHO IS WINNING THE WAR ON SOCIAL MEDIA?Prof. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project reveals an Oxford physicist’s diagram showing vaccine hesitant, pro-vax, and neutral communities on social media, and the shocking recruitment pace one is having on the other. (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:20:03 IS THE TERM ‘ANTI-VAX’ A SLUR? Prof. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project urges the healthcare community to stop using the derogatory term ‘anti-vaxxer.’ (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:26:24 THE ERADICATION OF HERD IMMUNITYProf. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project, describes the “biggest challenge” facing scientists, and the “very fragile state” of “vaccine-induced immunity.” (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

00:29:10 WAKE UP CALL FOR REAL SAFETY SCIENCEProf. Heidi Larson, Ph.D., Professor of Anthropology and Director of the Vaccine Confidence Project urges the medical community to invest in safety science, and states “you can’t repurpose the same old science to make it sound better if you don’t have the science that’s relevant to the new problem.”

00:37:22 FDA HEAD ACKNOWLEDGES A PLAN FOR SAFETY SURVEILLANCE Dr. Marion Gruber, Director, Office of Vaccines Research and Review,Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA, discusses pharmacological vigilance systems not yet in place, which are essential to “really inform risk management.”

00:42:30 CONTROVERSY AROUND ADJUVANTS IN VACCINES Dr. Martin Howell Friede, Coordinator, Initiative for Vaccine Research (IVR),W.H.O, discusses the required necessity of using adjuvants in vaccine development and their association with adverse reactions.

00:48:10 ANTIGENS & ADJUVANTS: THE GREAT UNKNOWN Prof. Stephen Evans, LSHTM, states an obvious issue regarding the lack of statistical power in safety trials. Dr. Martin Howell Friede, FDA, and Dr. David Kaslow, V.P., PATH, CVIA, W.H.O attempt to answer his question. (Dec 3, 2019)

00:54:17 TYRANNY OF SMALL NUMBERS Dr. David Kaslow, V.P., PATH, CVIA, discusses the conundrum of the “tyranny of small numbers” during small clinical trials for vaccine safety. Dr. Marion Gruber, Director, Office of Vaccines Research and Review, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA discusses current problems with the length of follow-up and post-marketing studies on vaccine safety. (Dec. 3rd, 2019)

1:03:50 THE NEXT TARGET POPULATION Dr. David Kaslow, V.P., PATH, CVIA, discusses the new target population for vaccines, pregnant women. (Dec 3, 2019)

1:10:04 GREAT QUESTION, TERRIBLE ANSWER Nigerian doctor and Program Manager for NEEICC, Bassey Okposen, asks a very important question regarding the safety science behind the use of different vaccines, adjuvants, and antigens. Dr. Robert Chen, Scientific Director of Brighton Collaboration, tries to “tease” out the answer.

1:21:43 W.H.O. CHIEF SCIENTIST CAUGHT LYING TO THE PUBLIC Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, Chief Scientist at the W.H.O., addresses the world in a promotional video where she ensures the robust existence of effective vaccine safety systems and the overall safety of vaccines. 1:25:06 Five days later, here is her diametrically different opinion behind closed doors at the Global Vaccine Safety Summit on Dec. 3rd, 2019.

https://www.facebook.com/haalymn/videos/761190678038989

Image by valelopardo from Pixabay

With rollout imminent, a NZ ‘vaccine expert’ claims “there has not been a single death attributed to this [new CV] vaccine”

Apology & correction thanks to a reader: I had referred previously to Dr Petousis-Harris incorrectly as an immunologist. She is an expert in the subject of vaccinology (definition at the end of the article). EWR

NZ Herald reportsThe first batch of Covid-19 vaccine has arrived in New Zealand and will be given to front line workers from Saturday. The rest of the country will follow as more doses become available” Auckland University vaccines expert Dr Helen Petousis-Harris answers some of your most frequently asked questions.

“The Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is very safe. It has been formally tested on more than 40,000 people…”

“Despite social media and YouTube posts, there has not been a single death attributed to this vaccine.”

Is the ‘esteemed’ expert relying on the (hitherto very reliable) ‘no correlation proven’ narrative with regard to this claim? For those of us who have been carefully reading & recording, of particular note the VAERS & CDC stats, and the 1100 plus deaths and thousands of (supposedly very rare) serious side effects to date (CDC figures) this claim leaves independent researchers with jaws dropped. Is death 25 minutes post vaccine still ‘no correlation’? I personally am stuck for words.

RELATED: Feedback on CV vax recipients includes death & some severe adverse reactions: read the VAERS vax injury database, a must see before making your informed decision

I will simply remind folk that this new vaccine was rolled out in less than twelve months when it normally takes 7-10 years. It is still in its experimental stages and has only been approved for emergency use. This one has been developed in less than 12 months, skipping the animal testing phase, and dubbed by Brian Hooker, a Biologist, Chemist at Simpson University (US) a ‘recipe for disaster’, (video at 4 min 56 sec).
https://tinyurl.com/sfakjvp0

Or… perhaps you the public are the ‘animals’ being tested
… in real time?

(PS I recommend you both listen to a lecture by Dr Simone Gold on topic, and search ‘covid vaccine deaths’ and ‘covid vaccine reactions’ in ‘categories’ at the left of the news page.) Note… if you search at Bitchute.com there are many smaller clips by Dr Gold. The above link is an hour long lecture.

Note: the term vaccinologist comes from the study of vaccinology:

“A nascent field of expertise related to the creation and deployment of vaccines; the field ‘borrows’ from epidemiology, immunology, infectious disease, pediatrics, preventive medicine, public health, virology”
American Heritage Medical Dictionary

OTHER RELATED ARTICLES:

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/for-those-still-deciding-about-the-new-non-mandatory-cv-vaccine-here-is-a-list-of-factors-to-consider/

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/some-pertinent-feedback-for-you-from-people-who-have-taken-the-covid-vaccine-for-which-clinical-trials-dont-finish-note-until-2023/

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/5-questions-to-ask-your-friends-who-plan-to-get-the-covid-vaccine/

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/hear-nz-lawyer-sue-grey-speak-on-informed-consent-your-legal-rights-around-vaccination/

EWR

Photo: Pixabay.com

India, world’s 2nd most populous country denies Pfizer’s vaccine for use there due to lack of safety & efficacy evidence – America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) urging Biden’s admin to respond

February 5, 2021

Calls on Biden White House, CDC to Address India’s Pfizer COVID Vaccine-Safety Decision

Indian health regulator denies Pfizer’s vaccine for use in world’s second-most populous country

Los Angeles, CA – America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today released the following statement urging the Biden administration to immediately respond to the decision by Indian health officials to deny authorization for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine based on a lack of safety and efficacy evidence, according to a Reuters report: “President Biden and his COVID-19 task force need to immediately and clearly explain to the American people why the Pfizer-BioNTech experimental vaccine is safe for Americans despite Indian drug regulators denying its emergency use based on concerns about potential side effects, immunogenicity, and other data. The burden of proof should fall on the Biden White House to provide Americans with greater transparency and information so that they can make informed decisions about their own healthcare. Science should guide this administration’s COVID response plan not public relations, polls, and politics.”

SOURCE: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/aflds-calls-on-biden-white-house-cdc-to-address-indias-pfizer-covid-vaccine-safety-decision/

Photo: Wikimedia (Parliament of India)

Where to run? – (not NZ anyway) (Corbett)

NZ, that ‘shining example of a totalitarian police state’ … can’t deny that … EWR

corbettreport 513K subscribers

SHOW NOTES AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=38119 Today on Questions For Corbett, James answers a frequently asked question about where people can move to in order to escape the globalist agenda.

Contrary to independent studies, DoC claims that 1080 does not kill or harm fish … important safety info if you fish for food

Posted by Kathy White at Facebook

“The Department of Conservation has been giving Pirongia landowners a flier that says “1080 does not kill or harm fish.” This is completely misleading and dangerous for those who eat fish, eels, shellfish and koura. See for yourself what scientists have said in an independent summary of research into 1080 and fish. Quotes: “There are indications of sub-lethal effects on fish among the very limited studies that have been done:“significantly greater weight loss occurred in eels exposed to 1080 compared to those that were not”…”the sub-lethal concentrations of 1080 in the water may have been sufficient to inhibit eel metabolism”…”sub-lethal 1080 exposure presented to eels through ingestion of contaminated possum may have been sufficient to temporarily inhibit eel metabolism” (Lyver et al., 2005)
“96-hour [exposure of Rainbow trout, half of individuals dead at] 54 mg/l, sub-lethal effects on survivors – not specified” (ERMA Agency, Appendix C)”Fish & Game ranger Lawson Davey said the national safety limit of 1080 in any food was 0.001 milligrams per kilogram, but the Cawthron Institute’s October toxicology results of 22 trout fed the poison showed muscle tissue with 1080 levels up to 4.7mg per kg.
https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/64310400/1080-drop-raises-trout-risk-fears
Preliminary results of a DoC-commissioned study by the Cawthron Research Institute has shown the flesh of trout that ate mice containing the toxin would have levels of 1080 that exceeded New Zealand Food Safety Authority limits.
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11332357
The maximum concentrations measured in trout tissue (up to 4.7 mg/kg) were observed at 24 h and 48 h after ingestion. The concentration decreased to close to 2 mg/kg after 84 h. An increase in 1080 concentration in the flesh was observed after 120 h, but the number of replicates at this interval was low (n = 2). Cawthron Institute: 1080 UPTAKE AND ELIMINATION IN RAINBOW TROUT
For more information, click on the link below.
https://1080science.co.nz/is-1080-harmless-to-fish/

1080science.co.nz
Is 1080 Harmless to Fish? | 1080 Science
The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment’s report on 1080 poison (Wright, 2011) claimed that effects of 1080 on populations of eels, koura and bullies had been studied (by Suren & Lambert, 2006) and that no effect on any of the fish was found.

SEE: Posts about 1080 in water

Limited time opportunity – register to watch a 9 part series presenting important info on vaccines

I’m a day late posting this unfortunately, but not too late to register and view. With mandatory vaccines being touted of late, everywhere pretty much, then this is a timely offering. The Truth About Vaccines is offering their series of videos free to view for a limited time. Register & avail yourselves of this opportunity. EWR (info below)

34K subscribers
The Truth About Vaccines docu-series is COMING SOON! Secure your free, virtual seat for the 9-day online health event right here. ➡️https://bit.ly/register-free-TTAV-2020 You may or may not have heard much about this highly argued topic, but you definitely will after this “Coronavirus quarantine” is all over. In light of the current coronavirus pandemic, doctors are weighing in, the media is weighing in, and even the government is weighing in and discussing the possibility that the coronavirus vaccine might be mandatory for everyone in the USA! States like California have already enacted forced vaccine legislation for children to attend school (both public AND private). In light of the current climate of fear and panic, it’s not a stretch of the imagination to think that legislation could be passed which requires “proof of vaccines” to travel or even assemble in a public place. It’s time to educate yourself and your family about this vitally important issue! Our brilliant team behind some of the most successful health documentary series in history has turned its eye firmly to investigating the “pro vs. anti” vaccine safety debate. We’ve pulled together more than 60 of the foremost experts on the planet to give you a “no holds barred” look at the vaccine debate so you can get the very best information for your own family. Our explosive 9 episode docu-series, “The Truth About Vaccines 2020,” is coming soon and you can watch it 100% for free. ➡️https://bit.ly/register-free-TTAV-2020

 

Parents should be informed about both the benefits and the risks associated with vaccines — without pressure, propaganda, or agenda.

So we brought together more than 60 of the world’s foremost health experts to investigate both sides of this contentious debate to give you the science, the history, and the untold story… the REAL information you need to make an informed decision on how to best protect your child.

What You Will Learn

  • The History of Vaccines

Vaccination programs are given credit for eradicating some of the most devastating illnesses of the past, but they’re no longer immune to controversy of their own.

  • Vaccine Risks and Safety Concerns

Concerns about vaccine injuries, mercury toxicity, and autism have increased substantially in recent years, and public debate is once again heating up.

  • Full List of Options and Alternatives

You don’t have to pro- or anti-vaccine anymore. New options are available to guard against serious illness, based on your unique situation and risk factors.

  • ALL NEW Episodes for 2020!

Two new full episodes titled: “Censorship & Suppression” and “W.H.O.’s Not Telling the Truth?”

Don’t miss out. Register here now.

 

 

Image by HeungSoon from Pixabay

Italians take to the streets protesting mandatory vaccines!

Reposting this as folk have been saying they can’t open it … see below (& note it is 2017) .. EWR

TRANSLATION: More than 3000 people in one place for freedom of vaccination choice. No to the exclusion of children from schools due to vaccination. As long as there is risk and harm from vaccine there must be freedom of choice.
Health is not a joke, freedom of choice and safety.
The state recognizes vaccine damage in law 210/92, following the post-vaccination death of the two Tremante brothers. Despite this, thousands of cases are still pending
for compensation, including deaths.

Brian Shilhavy
Health Impact News Editor

Readers from Italy have been contacting Health Impact News this past week (June, 2017), asking us to cover the massive demonstrations happening throughout Italy to protest a new mandatory vaccine law. This news has been censored from the U.S. corporate media.

Francesca Alesse, who worked with the VAXXED film team to get the film shown in Italy last year, writes:

In an unprecedented way, the decree-law proposed by the Minister of Health has been signed by the sitting Italian president Sergio Mattarella. Only four vaccines were mandatory in Italy, now that number triples to 12.

No other decree-law has moved so fast in the Italian legislative system, the reasons of such hurry are incomprehensible considering that the Istituto Superiore Di Sanità (the local version of the CDC) has declared that contrary to what stated in the decree itself there is no objective urgency. There are no epidemics, the number of cases of measles or meningitis in the current year have been substantially lower than the previous year.

Thousands of parents have protested the new law this past June 3rd,  protests and marches have taken place in 21 Italian cities spread across the nation. A national protest is scheduled for this Sunday June 11th.

The translated full text of the decree-law is found here.

Florence-Protest-600x338
Recent protests in Florence. Photo sent to Health Impact News from an Italian readera caption

The new law apparently has severe consequences for parents who fail to comply, including the possibility of having their children taken away from them. In addition to public outcry, there appears to be strong political opposition to the law as well.

Elisabetta Bressan, an Italian commenting on Facebook writes:

Protests are going to increase here, as our Government has announced…  a law to introduce 12 mandatory vaccines. The law…. was announced by our Health Ministry to be as follows: 12 mandatory vaccination needed to have access to pre-school system (age 0-6): no vaccination, no enrollment, no exceptions; for mandatory school (age 0-16) if kids were not vaccinated parents should pay a penalty between 500€ and 7.500€ per year, if you cannot afford it, you’ll be refer to Jouvanile Court, that could suspend your parents rights to get your children vaccinated. A national protest is envisaged in Rome on June 11.

This will start within the next school year (September 2017); it has been calculated that more then 800,000 kids will need to receive a massive vaccination in a very little time.

As you know, Italy had been chosen in 2014 as leading Country for the WHO world vaccination campaign co-financed by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, therefore what happen here can affect also other countries.

Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.

In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.

One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

doctors-on-the-vaccine-debate

One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”

However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.

The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.

Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.

In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.

Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.

These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.

In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.

Read:

Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?

There are 400 peer-reviewed published scientific studies proving that vaccines are neither safe, nor effective

Are there peer-reviewed published scientific studies proving that vaccines are not safe, nor effective? Why yes, there are. Here are 400 to start with. Note, you can look inside at Amazon’s website. (Click on the image).

NZ Police reveal new $20m body armour

Disarm the people. Arm the Police … body armour, guns, armoured vehicles, home visits to inquire as to political views. Something is not right with this picture. Three people recently shot by Police in as many weeks. Think what could be achieved with all of that money. Alleviate growing poverty and homelessness for starters. EWR

From odt.co.nz

Police Commissioner Mike Bush has today revealed new improved body armour will be delivered to all officers over the next three years.

Police have signed a contract with Cooneen Protection for the manufacture and supply of the new gear. Cooneen also provide body armour for London’s Metropolitan Police force.

Police are spending $20.7m over four years to make the replacements.

“It’s a significant investment but the safety of our staff is paramount,” Bush said.

“To keep communities safe, first police must keep themselves safe.

“So today I’m proud to announce we are investing in a new body armour system that will help keep police safe.

“With more than a million interactions with the public every year, the vast majority is New Zealanders engage with us appropriately. However, it’s unfortunately the nature of police work that some people want to harm us.”

Existing body armour remained fit for purpose while the new armour was introduced over the next three years, he said.

Both current and new armour meet international safety standards for stab and ballistic resistance.

SOURCE

https://www.odt.co.nz/news/national/police-reveal-new-20m-body-armour?fbclid=IwAR2_C93UrdS41k8N_bR-3_EidMk_pdYGLGY2v88NWHej_12qvKNdiZmXAj0

How the safety and efficacy research was done for Gardasil – Dr Suzanne Humphries

66.5K subscribers

Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Polly Tommey go through the Gardasil inserts and explore how the safety and efficacy research was done and what the results were. Camera by Joshua Coleman and Anu Vaidya with editing by Joshua Coleman.

Has even one MP asked why DoC staff feel so threatened they need $11 million of public money to protect them against the NZ public? (Sue Grey, Lawyer)

From Sue Grey, LLB(Hons), BSc (Biochemistry and Microbiology), RSH Dip PHI

A few questions we need to be asking …

“I wonder if even one MP asked why DoC staff feel so threatened that they need $11 million of public money to protect their staff against the NZ public they are supposed to represent when New Zealanders generally love the Outdoors?

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/391220/department-of-conservation-gets-11m-to-protect-staff-from-anti-1080-protesters

I wonder why they went ahead anyway and gave them more of our money to build more barriers between us, and more money to spread yet more poison – despite all the evidence of cruelty, breaches of the Wildlife and Animal Welfare Act and that it is not achieving their stated objective? If poison is the answer, surely we are asking the wrong question. .

 

http://suegrey.co.nz/index.php/2019/11/03/i-wonder/

How to uncover 5G & Smart City plans & hold your council to account on the health & safety risks

Some guidance in how to hold your local council accountable for their possible involvement with the roll out of 5G. Please read full info at the link. See also the related information at the website. EWR

From saveusnow.org.uk

All United Kingdom and Common Wealth residents can use this FOI request form as a template to send to Central Government, 4th Sector Organisations, Public entities, Local, District and Country Councils, Police and all Emergency Services to understand their 5G, GSM, WIFI and Smart Device plans, strategies and implementations, such as LED streetlight systems that we now know are being used as the method of deploying 5G in a town near you, totally under the radar, in practical secret and without so far as we can see, ANY UNDERSTANDING OF SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR THIS 5G TECHNOLOGY. This FOI will give you and our community a National insight into how well resourced your Council is; who they are giving your money to; and how much you are being left in the dark by these unscrupulous companies/suppliers.

Please make sure you change [COUNCIL] for your own Council or entity. If you’re using a Word-type package you can Edit > Find > Replace > Type in [Council] and replace with e.g.: Gateshead Council > click OK > You will see the change is done automatically.

Also, you do not have to use this template in full, you can take out sections, as you may only want to know about LED streetlights or 5G. Please note, some councils may require longer to find all the information, so be patient with them if you are asked to give them an extension. You can usually find the email to send this to in the bottom of websites.

Please share this across all your networks, let’s SHOW THEM WE MEAN BUSINESS.

Dear [Council]

This is a Freedom of Information Request.

1. Do you have a 5G strategy?

1.1 If yes, I request to see the complete strategy, its ambitions and its objectives in PPTX, Word, PDF or picture format.

1.2 If yes, has the public had the opportunity to read and understand [Council’s] 5G strategy? Where was this information published?

1.3 I also request a supplementary document that includes the highest level of detail on all 5G technology that’s planned to be used and current in use in public spaces within [Council]:

(a) Companies and entities involved and the names of the company/entity officers.

(b) Specification sheets of 5G technology.

(c) What technology e.g. units and arrays are not currently 5G, but can be 5G enabled e.g. with current software, future software, hardware upgrades or retrofitting?

(d) What UK, EU and International safety standards is [Council] complying with for the 5G strategy and existing 5G technology.

(e) I request proof e.g. a certificate from [Council] that confirms that UK, EU and International safety standards for workers and the public have been meet.

1.4 If no, I request to know when you will be chairing a 5G strategy?

2. I request the name/s of the Officer/s in charge of the 5G strategy and roll out for 5G and Smart Cities; and who their subject area expert or consultancy is, their CV and qualifications on 5G and Smart Cities.

3. Are you in talks with any experts, companies or entities about autonomous vehicles (AV) for public transport and/or private use on Public Highways?

3.1 If yes, I request to see the complete strategy, its ambitions and its objectives in PPTX, Word, PDF or picture format.

3.2 I also request a supplementary document that includes all levels of detail on:

(a) Companies and entities involved and the names of the company/entity officers?

(b) Specification sheets of all technology.

(c) What type of communication system will [Council] be utilising to control the vehicles?

(d) What UK, EU and International safety standards does your AV strategy and rollout comply with?

(e) I request proof e.g. a certificate from [Council] that confirms that UK, EU and International safety standards for workers and the public have been meet.

4. Do you have a strategy for smart roads and smart signage on Public Highways and Public spaces?

4.1 If yes, I request to see the complete strategy, its ambitions and its objectives in PPTX, Word, PDF or picture format.

4.2 I also request a supplementary document that includes all levels of detail on:

(a) Companies and entities involved and the names of the company/entity officers?

(b) Specification sheets of all technology.

(c) What technology e.g. units and arrays will not be 5G, but can be 5G enabled e.g. with current software, future software, hardware upgrades or retrofitting etc (you must be specific on anything here)?

(d) What UK, EU and International safety standards does your 5G strategy and rollout comply with?

(e) I request proof e.g. a certificate from [Council] that confirms that UK, EU and International safety standards for workers and the public have been meet.

5. Are you planning to rollout or have rolled out LED street lighting?

5.1 If yes, please answer these questions:

(a) What is the CMS and specification of the software and hardware of the LED street light system?

(b) What type of waveform is the LED? e.g. Square wave?

(c) Can you control the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) of the streetlight system using the CMS?

(d) Can you control the PWM of each streetlight that’s connected to the system?

(e) What restrictions do you have in place for the control of the PWM?

(f) What is the UK, EU and International safety limit (low and high) for the amount of ‘flicker’ (Hz) the Human Body and eyes can be exposed to and for how long?

(g) I request to see the training manual and safety operation manual for the CMS and the LED streetlight system.

(h) Who is the company who is or has installed the CMS LED streetlight system?

(i) What company maintains and repairs the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(j) What entity and Officer is responsible for the safety standards for the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(k) I request proof e.g. a certificate from [Council] that confirms that UK, EU and International safety standards for workers and the public have been meet.

(l) What is the amount of Blue Light leakage that’s safe for the public and workers during the LED streetlights operation?

(m) What level of LED streetlight exposure is safe for the public at daytime and night time?

(n) Is there a legal requirement for diffusers to be fitted to LED streetlights?

(o) How have you have addressed the amount of Oxidative Stress on Human and Animal cells that’s produced from LED?

5.2 If no, then I request a declaration from [Council] that you will not be installing LED streetlights in the future. If you cannot provide a declaration, I would like the following answered in the future tense:

(a) What is the CMS and specification of the software and hardware of the LED street light system?

(b) What type of waveform is the LED? e.g. Square wave?

(c) Can you control the Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) of the streetlight system using the CMS?

(d) Can you control the PWM of each streetlight that’s connected to the system?

(e) What restrictions do you have in place for the control of the PWM?

(f) What is the UK, EU and International safety limit (low and high) for the amount of ‘flicker’ (Hz) the Human Body and eyes can be exposed to and for how long?

(g) I request to see the training manual and safety operation manual for the CMS and the LED streetlight system.

(h) Who is the company who is or has installed the CMS LED streetlight system?

(i) What company maintains and repairs the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(j) What entity and Officer is responsible for the safety standards for the CMS and LED streetlight system?

(k) I request proof e.g. a certificate from [Council] that confirms that UK, EU and International safety standards for workers and the public have been meet.

(l) What is the amount of Blue Light leakage that’s safe for the public and workers during the LED streetlights operation?

(m) What level of LED streetlight exposure is safe for the public at daytime and night time?

(n) Is there a legal requirement for diffusers to be fitted to LED streetlights?

(o) How have you have addressed the amount of Oxidative Stress on Human and Animal cells that’s produced from LED?

6. Where do you have 3G and 4G systems in public spaces and public roads?

DOWNLOAD THE DOCUMENT HERE:

5g FOI Smombie Gate

The Normalization of Corruption—Big Pharma Takes “Tobacco Tactics” to a New Level

From childrenshealthdefense.org

The 21st century organized crime lords—the pharmaceutical industry—archetypal la cosa nostra mafia-like cartels, have risen to unprecedented dominion over humanity. These renegade modern-day, too-big-to-fail outlaws have mastered and expanded the industry corruption playbook to levels that make the tobacco industry seem relatively tame and honest in comparison. Big Pharma has methodically choreographed a stealthy take-over of our most fundamental democratic institutions necessary to maintain industry in check: the regulatory institutions, the legislatures, politicians, free press/media, academia and objective science.

Big Pharma today not only influences legislation for drugs, but the vaccine producers are also guaranteed a self-serving, automatically-captured consumer market in the form of 74 million children to whom the government mandates their limited-liability vaccine products in unprecedented numbers.

Following the money

Americans spend the highest amount on health care in the world at $3.65 trillion, which represents 18% of the GDP. Big Pharma today not only influences legislation for drugs, but the vaccine producers are also guaranteed a self-serving, automatically-captured consumer market in the form of 74 million children to whom the government mandates their limited-liability vaccine products in unprecedented numbers. Today’s bloated childhood vaccine schedule is a direct result of the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), a law passed by congress at the time, to keep the vaccine producers from going bankrupt from lawsuits brought forth by families with vaccine-injured children. This law, in effect, unfastened the free-market incentives to make safe products from the vaccine producers, unleashing increasingly more and more inadequately tested and monitored products on to the market.

The pharmaceutical industry spends a combined $26 billion annually to influence doctors to sell their drugs and to entice consumers to purchase their drugs. Pharma strikes a one-two knockout punch in drug sales by investing an average of $6 billion annually in direct to consumer advertisement, followed by an even larger $20 billion investment to persuade doctors to sell their drugs to consumers who are herded to their offices to obtain the direct to consumer (DTC) advertised drugs.

Financial incentives and conflicts abound in pediatrics as well. Major streams of income come from “wellness” visits, a euphemism for infants and children being brought into the pediatrician’s office, in order to receive the closely followed CDC mandated childhood vaccine schedule. In addition to the steady foot traffic generated by the vaccine schedule, pediatricians are rewarded financial incentives per fully vaccinated child in their practice by insurance companies.

… drug companies and allied advocates have an army of lobbyists in all 50 states and have spent more than $880 million on lobbying and political contributions at the state and federal level over the past decade.

Neutering the regulatory bodies

Equally disturbing, pharma has strategically and systematically neutered regulatory bodies such as the CDC and FDA, through a constant cross-pollination of industry and government heads. This revolving door has expressly created ever deeper conflicts of interest and blurred lines of duty. For example, Julie Gerberding, the former director of the CDC (2002-2009), joined Merck in January 2010 as the president of Merck’s vaccines department. In fact, this revolving door appears to be quite a prevalent phenomenon. Dr. Presad, an oncologist from Oregon Health and Science University discovered: “a quarter of the Food and Drug Administration employees who approved cancer and hematology drugs from 2001 through 2010 left the agency and now work or consult for pharmaceutical companies”.

In addition, the Associated Press and Center for Public Integrity, show drug companies and allied advocates have an army of lobbyists in all 50 states and have spent more than $880 million on lobbying and political contributions at the state and federal level over the past decade. The opioid lobby, for example, contributed to 7,100 candidates for state level offices.

These unorthodox, forged relationships, all together, serve as a secure and impervious interconnected web for pharma to wield more influence and power as it creates an ever more captive audience for its products.

Extended reach

Pharma’s reach also extends into media and science garnered through strategic financial entanglements.  The U.S. and New Zealand are two of the only countries that permit drug makers to advertise their products directly to consumers, a practice that is illegal or frowned upon in the rest of the globe. As previously discussed a large portion of the revenue for the mainstream media, (up to 70%) in the U.S. comes from pharmaceutical advertisement: “Just considering television, 187 commercials for about 70 prescription medications have collectively aired almost half a million times since the start of 2018, and to do that, drug companies shelled out $2.8 billion”.

Lastly, most of the clinical safety trials performed on vaccines and drugs is performed by institutionalized scientists who are on the industry payroll, and the FDA is increasingly approving and fast-tracking drugs despite dangerous or inconclusive evidence that they are either safe or effective. These unorthodox, forged relationships, all together, serve as a secure and impervious interconnected web for pharma to wield more influence and power as it creates an ever more captive audience for its products. This behemoth power’s next move is the fierce state-by-state push to remove exemptions and the basic human right to informed consent. The last barrier to pharma’s complete unadulterated power is removing human autonomy and the ability to decide for one’s self and family what medical interventions are beneficial and which ones may be rife with potential risk and little benefit.  Any rudimentary perusal of the main vaccine makers’ track record, Merck, GSK, Pfizer and Sanofi (The BIG 4), will illuminate a sordid history of criminal behavior with $billions paid for fines, otherwise known “as the cost of doing business”.

SOURCE:

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/the-normalization-of-corruption-big-pharma-takes-tobacco-tactics-to-a-new-level/?fbclid=IwAR0K9e2yIsSOlG9cA8mikM5EiBRr9jGXdnqQM4ol4cRqHp2ZKVt4-ksUxnk

© [Article Date] Children’s Health Defense, Inc. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of Children’s Health Defense, Inc. Want to learn more from Children’s Health Defense? Sign up for free news and updates from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and the Children’s Health Defense. Your donation will help to support us in our efforts.

 

A 6-month old child dies 36 hours after 6 vaccines, pathologist ‘cannot find’ cause of death & is unwilling to test for possible vaccine impact

Are Western Doctors Compelled To Support The Vaccine Industry?

From virutron.com

A 6-month old child died a day and a half after receiving her scheduled 6 vaccines, and her mother is outraged that the pathologist cannot find the cause of death but is unwilling to do tests to determine the possible impact of the vaccines.

Are most doctors put into a corner when a child they have just given vaccines to gets injured or dies? Would they feel free to say they suspect that the vaccines are the cause even if they believed it to be true?

If we take a broad overview of the structure of conventional medicine in our Western societies, we are left with an inescapable conclusion: it is set up as a business, where profit is most highly valued and human health and safety is secondary. The evidence for this is overwhelming and is discussed in greater detail in many of our articles on the subject listed at the end of this article.

This is absolutely not to say that there are not loving, upstanding people who are doctors, researchers, or otherwise as part of the Western medical establishment. Not at all. I believe most of them are. However, when it comes specifically to the family doctors and pediatricians who are trusted by their patients to make recommendations for their patients’ health and well-being, there is a limit to how far they can push the boundaries of the highly controlled business structure they find themselves in.

This is probably most obvious when it comes to vaccines. I don’t think any doctor could tell me straight-faced that if they decided that vaccines were not safe for their patients, and they were openly vocal about it in public, that there wouldn’t be pushback from their industry, including intimidation and threats of losing their medical license. And so, unfortunately, there is a built-in bias from the start, and doctors know that going down the path of truly doing their own independent research into the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, in order to make an informed decision about what they will recommend to their patients, will either be a lot of work for nothing or will end up with them having to fight against their powerful establishment and risk losing their livelihood.

https://virutron.com/are-western-doctors-compelled-to-support-the-vaccine-industry/?fbclid=IwAR38DZs1CPtD_qeYCXYUVz-qKul4JzX9kZucHXUjcCdq4-lalfP2wEpxg4A

See the radiation emitted from a baby monitor

From thecontrail.com

https://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/from-neil-who-measures-the-radiation-from-a-baby-monitor?xg_source=activity

VIDEO INFO:

Published on Nov 28, 2018

PLEASE SUPPORT my EMF Safety Zone Channel! – EMF Meters, Consulting, Resources: https://emf-protection.us – eBay store for EMF meters, protecting clothing, and related products at the lowest prices: http://www.ebaystores.com/healthyjoyf… Join me on Twitter for educational updates! https://twitter.com/EMFSafetyZone / @EMFSafetyZone I have covered the name of the company who makes this wireless baby monitor. However, ‘wireless’ baby monitors, of various types, and from various companies will be similar in function. I have also chosen to not make any statements regarding the safety or lack of safety of this product. That will be for you to decide. I have simply provided the summary of clinical research done by the scientists who compiled the BioInitiative Report 2012. This information is available at: http://www.bioinitiative.org. You may watch this video and make your own decisions based upon what you are watching.

 

People must now seek permission to film Horowhenua DC’s PUBLIC meetings – what’s to hide?

You can watch the discussion around this here at the publicly streamed HDC meeting. It will be up for some months but not forever (See other links in the POST SCRIPT at the end of the article). From hereon in anyway, if you wish to film HDC’s public meeting you must seek permission first. It’s about protecting staff, same as the rationale for vetting staff emails. Staff safety. Unless your name is Cr Ross Campbell that is.

Since Mayor Feyen was elected we’ve had live streaming of Council meetings, initially to FB also however with what appears to be a growing trend in censorship & control at the Horowhenua LG level (the intercepted emails, the stonewalling of the people’s mayor, the refusal to open the books, the shut down of a local land owner’s water supply … I could go on) the FB streaming’s been stopped. You can listen to the discussion around that at the HDC website. (Good luck on finding it, it was the meeting prior to 10/10). The available stream at HDC’s site appears to be edited by the simple fact it switches view periodically & frequently what is being said cannot be heard or cuts off midstream.

A local person who spoke in the public speaking time, outlined that he has been filming meetings for 8-9 years with never a problem. Independent filming meant there was always an independent & true record of the proceedings available should any other system fail.

Apparently at the tea break of the said meeting on 10/10/18, he requested permission to film and was denied. No time wasted in putting the said tweaks to operations into action.

This all also takes place around the event of the aforementioned Cr Campbell fearing for his safety & announcing at the last meeting that he had sought Police advice & from thereon in would be carrying a pen size camera to use if any threatening behaviour should recur. That of course went down like a lead balloon. Going by the responses, few were bothered for his safety, rather he was ridiculed for his precautionary measures. If you take time to listen to the meeting you will hear the many comments around that (hopefully).

In case you didn’t know Cr Campbell was assaulted in 2004 so he has every right to be taking precautionary measures. You can read about that event here. (At the link be sure to read the related articles as another assault allegedly relating to Council issues occurred in 2016).

Likewise, former Cr and Mayoral candidate Mrs Anne Hunt who also spoke on 10/10/18, told of how she had received death threats as a Mayoral candidate. You should hear that on the stream (hopefully). She spoke similarly the day Cr Campbell was unseated which media completely ignored. These threats are clearly not something to be ridiculed. And yet your elected councilors (well some of them anyway) seem little bothered about them.

So people, if you want to hear the public meetings & see for yourself the bad schoolboy-like behaviour of some of the councilors, you’ll need to be there in person. Streaming will continue but I personally wouldn’t be too reliant on its being the full uncut version you’ll see somehow. In my opinion anyway.

Finally, it’s not that easy to find & access the public stream on HDC’s website. It’s what folk have been complaining about since it left FB. I’ve just looked & can’t find it so had to return to the link placed on HDC’s FB page. Too bad if you’re not on FB. You could phone HDC for directions.

POST SCRIPT:

Mayor Feyen has just posted this link for the streaming, keep the link for future reference: http://www.ustream.tv/channel/7dRfxBRYt8m

Here also is a link for Part 2 of the HDC Council meeting involving restrictions on filming these public meetings.  http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/117579383

The Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) appears to be more about monitoring than about safety

From bolenreport.com

The CDC Calls It Something Else – But, we’ll go with the Truth…

Opinion by Deplorable Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Anti-Vaxxers – your gut feelings were right.  Autism is NOT the worst thing that vaccines have done.  The Pro-Vaxxers have significantly damaged a whole generation, and like the Nazis in World War II, they kept detailed, but secret, records of it.

The map at the top of this page [at the link] shows that there are NINE contractors, in EIGHT States, that work with the completely corrupt US Center for Disease Control (CDC) to carry out what is OFFICIALLY known as the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) study.

But once we begin to examine what is REALLY going on, something else became VERY obvious…

The VSD Has NOTHING to do with vaccine safety…

It has EVERYTHING to do with secretly monitoring the effects of MASSIVE numbers of vaccines on children heading for adulthood beginning January 1st 1991 to the present.

It is NO SURPRISE that every one of the participating States showed up prior to the 2016 election in the “Blue State column of national US politics.

“Blue States” were picked for this project, I think, because liberals, as a group, do not question Big Government, but, in fact, embrace it.  Frankly, they think what CNN tells them to think.  CNN gives them their buzz-words for the day.  Like good little socialist/communists they smile while they do what their masters tell them to do.

READ MORE

http://bolenreport.com/the-blue-state-vaccines-for-depopulation-study-is-the-key/

BREAKING: US HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CAN’T FIND 32 YEARS OF VACCINE SAFETY RESEARCH

So this department overseeing the health of the public can’t find 32 years of vaccine safety research?  Time to get reading the independent research to date isn’t it? As many folk already are.

From jeffereyjackson.com

The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act started the process to fully absolve pharmaceutical companies from liability for the injuries and deaths their vaccine products cause. In addition, the 1986 Act also removed the normal market forces and legal repercussions which exist to ensure safer vaccine products. By giving economic immunity to Big Pharma, it removed any incentive for those companies to maintain, improve on and guarantee the safety of their vaccines.

Instead, the 1986 Act put the US Health and Human Services (HHS) in charge of doing continued safety and quality monitoring of the vaccines comprising America’s recommended vaccine schedule. HHS was tasked with two jobs: to end infectious disease and to reduce the risk of vaccine injury. Specifically, the 1986 Act states in subsection a, that HHS shall:

promote the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less serious adverse reactions than those vaccines on the market…” and to “make or assure improvements in…the manufacturing, testing, warning, field surveillance, adverse reaction reporting and researching on vaccines in order to reduce the risk of adverse reactions to vaccines.”

There was also a deadline for HHS to adhere to when applying the above mandated criteria. The 1986 Act states:

Within 2 years after December 22, 1987, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit…a report describing the actions taken pursuant to subsection a…

Last year, Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to HHS asking for any documents related to the work done by HHS pursuant to the mandate laid out in the 1986 Act. In short, the FOIA request asked for any reports HHS has given the US Congress over the last 32 years that show they are making vaccines safer. After HHS was unable to produce the requested documents, ICAN, along with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., filed a lawsuit. The lawsuit gave HHS three options:

  1. To give all the information as requested in the original FOIA request
  2. To give a credible explanation why HHS can’t disclose the information; or
  3. To admit HHS doesn’t have any documents which would show they have done what they were tasked to do

​In the end, HHS recently settled with what is called a court ordered stipulation, admitting the following:​

https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/breaking-us-health-and-human-services-cant-find-32-years-of-vaccine-safety-research

Photo: jeffereyjackson.com

Save Our NZ Land lines! Important info & petition

Introducing a new NZ website, Save Our Landlines

NB: For updates, please check our NEWS section regularly at this link:

http://www.saveourlandlines.nz/category/news/.

We also have a FB page at this link:

https://www.facebook.com/Save-Our-Landlines-NZ-1626155717464225/

Introduction

This site is a community project by New Zealanders who do not want to see our copper landline infrastructure, which will function in a power blackout to be allowed to be run down or destroyed.

A corded phone that is connected to the copper landline network is a lifeline to emergency services if a storm or other event causes widespread power outages since this type of phone will work even if your home has no power.

The copper landline phone system allows people to choose to have a safe corded home phone.

This is particularly important in households with children given that their developing brain may be more vulnerable to adverse effects from cordless or cellular phones.

Many more reasons why the copper landline system is important and should be preserved may be found at this link: http://www.saveourlandlines.nz/uncategorized/welcome/

We hope that you will support our online petition which you will be able to to access via the link below:

Whos-on-the-wire-image-of-couple-talking-on-ladnline-phones

Please join us

Your voice in defence of our copper landline network and your taking the time to help educate others about the importance of this important national infrastructure. If you would like to volunteer to help with this campaign, please contact us via the Contact Form.  Thank you.

We also have a Facebook page that you can like and/or follow at this link: https://www.facebook.com/Save-Our-Landlines-NZ-1626155717464225/

RELATED:

The Future of Landlines & Networks
http://electromagnetichealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/ReInventing-Wires-1-25-18-FINAL.pdf

There’s absolutely NO sound science backing the assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe

Having heard recently of NZ GPs advising pregnant mothers to vaccinate I’m posting this for you to consider. Ask your Doctor to show you the research that tells you it’s been tested thoroughly on pregnant women. It would seem there will be little if anything to show you. You may be the guinea pig perhaps. This article is from an Dr Mercola’s website. From the article:

Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S

Check it out for yourself.
EnvirowatchRangitikei


Story at-a-glance

  • In decades past, women were as a general rule told to avoid toxic exposures during pregnancy, such as cigarette smoke, alcohol, household cleaning products, radiation, medications and other toxic exposures
  • Today, pregnant women face a set of difficult questions and choices about keeping themselves and their babies healthy, as they’re increasingly being told to get a variety of vaccines during pregnancy
  • In 2006, the CDC strengthened recommendations that all pregnant women, healthy or not, should get a flu shot in any trimester. As of 2011, a pertussis-containing Tdap shot is also recommended for all pregnant women
  • The time-honored rule of avoiding any potential toxic exposure that might interfere with the normal development of the fetus has been suspended and replaced with an assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe
  • There’s absolutely NO sound science backing the assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe. On the contrary, there is a lack of available science and testing in this area.

By Barbara Loe Fisher

It was 1977 when I found out I was going to become a Mom. I instinctively knew I needed to be careful while I was pregnant, especially during the first two trimesters when the major organ systems of the fetus develop at a rapid rate. In the 1960s, there had been a lot of publicity about babies dying or being born without arms or legs because women had taken a drug (Thalidomide) for morning sickness in the first or second trimester of pregnancy1 and I wanted to make sure I did everything I could to protect my health and the health of my baby before and after he was born.

Mothers to be in my generation were told to take extra vitamins and eat nutritious food but, most of all, to avoid anything that could harm the developing fetus like alcohol, cigarette smoke, medications, radiation, household cleaning products and other toxic exposures. Some of us were aware of the risks of heavy anesthesia during delivery and signed up for Lamaze classes to prepare for a drug-free birth, which many obstetricians discouraged, and we chose to breastfeed, even though a lot of pediatricians were pushing formula and bottles back then.

Today, pregnant women face a different set of difficult questions and choices about keeping themselves and their babies healthy. Among them are whether or not to get vaccinations during pregnancy that public health officials, obstetricians and pediatricians say will protect pregnant women and their newborns from getting sick with influenza and B. pertussis whooping cough.

Toxic Exposures & Assumption of Safety – Is It A Good Idea?

Although since the 1970s, public health officials have recommended influenza vaccinations for pregnant women in the second or third trimester,2 relatively few obstetricians promoted the vaccine until the past decade when, in 2006, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) strengthened recommendations that all pregnant women, healthy or not, should get a flu shot in any trimester.3

Then, in 2011, a pertussis containing Tdap shot was recommended for all pregnant women, preferably after 20 weeks gestation.4 Both current vaccine recommendations are5, 6, 7 endorsed by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG),8, 9 the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and other medical trade associations.10, 11

With these recommendations, the time-honored rule of avoiding any potential toxic exposure that might interfere with the normal development of the fetus has been suspended and replaced with an assumption that vaccination during pregnancy is safe. But what is the scientific evidence documenting that this assumption is a well-informed one?

Glaring Lack of Safety Testing

You have to look no further than information in the vaccine manufacturer product inserts and posted online by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control (CDC) to quickly answer that question.

FACT: Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving influenza or Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S.12, 13 and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological responses to these vaccines that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes.14

READ MORE

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/11/10/vaccination-during-pregnancy.aspx


For further info watch the following video also on the DTAP vaccine while pregnant:

 

If you’re pregnant and thinking of getting the TDaP vaccine, you might want to watch this video and reconsider. Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books or Stickers for sale: http://myincredibleopinion.com On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredible… On Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forrestmaready

Matata existing use rights cull one step closer after Bay of Plenty Regional Council decision – another Agenda 21/30 land grab?

This looks like Agenda 21/30. Land grabs in other places also. Search other articles in ‘categories’. See all of our Agenda pages at the main menu, also see Local Govt Watch pages also at the main menu. Similar happening in the Christchurch rebuild.

from Stuff.co.nz

Matata landowners have been left in limbo after a proposal to strip existing use rights over safety concerns was accepted by Bay of Plenty Regional Council.

The landmark decision will see 34 houses and sections lose the right to inhabit their property as part of a voluntary retreat. It is believed to be the first time the Resource Management Act has been used in this manner.

Whakatane District Council lobbied Bay of Plenty Regional Council to consider a plan change that will prohibit residential activity in the Awatarariki Fanhead at Matatā after March 2021. The plan change was suggested after $1.2 million was spent investigating how to mitigate safety concerns to residents unsuccessfully.

The plan change will prohibit all residential activity in the affected area.

READ MORE:
* A town damned becasue a dam was never built
Anger at forced acquisition of 34 Bay of Plenty properties

Impacted residents say they will fight the plan change through legal means.

“We don’t want this to end up in court but when you back people into a corner they fight,” resident spokesman Rick Whalley said.

“That’s where we are now. We’re backed into the corner and we have to fight. They have taken away everything we have. We can’t sell. We can’t get loans. What other option do we have?”

https://www.stuff.co.nz/business/property/101608589/matata-existing-use-rights-cull-one-step-closer-after-bay-of-plenty-regional-council-decision

PHOTO: Wikipedia

Flu Shot Remains Most Dangerous Vaccine Based on Injuries and Deaths Compensated by Government

  • Flubok: “Safety and effectiveness in children 3 years to less than 18 years of age have not been established.”
  • Flucelvax: “Safety and effectiveness have not been established in children less than 18 years of age.”
  • Fluzone: “Safety and effectiveness in children below the age of 6 months have not been established.”
  • Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”
  • FluLaval: “Safety and effectiveness in children younger than 3 years have not been established.”
  • Afluria: “…not approved for use in children less than 5 years of age.”
  • Fluarix: “…not approved for use in children younger than 3 years.”
  • Fluvirin: “The safety and immunogenicity have not been established in children under 4 years of age.”

by Health Impact News

The Department of Justice issues a report on vaccine injuries and deaths every quarter to the Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (Click on “Meeting Book – PDF – 10.8 MB” for September 3rd meeting). There are 211 cases for vaccine injuries and deaths for the period 5/16/2015 through 8/15/2015.

86 of the settlements were listed in this report, giving the name of the vaccines, the injury, and the amount of time the case was pending before settlement. Three of those settlements were for deaths linked to vaccines, with two deaths related to the flu shot, and one death for the HPV shot. 65 of the 86 settlements were for injuries and deaths due to the flu shot, and the majority of flu shot injuries were for Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS).

These quarterly reports on vaccine injuries and death settlements from the U.S. vaccine court are seldom, if ever, reported in the mainstream media. We report them here at Health Impact News. Here is the September 3rd, 2015 report:

READ MORE

https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/flu-shot-remains-most-dangerous-vaccine-based-on-injuries-and-deaths-compensated-by-government/

Petition For Inquiry into the storage of bulk 1080 in the Whitianga Central Business District – please read & consider signing – it could be your district next

We the undersigned petition the Mayor, Chief Executive, and elected councillors of Thames Coromandel District Council to undertake a full and independent enquiry into the storage of 1080 in the Whitianga CBD at 20 Joan Gaskell Drive, behind Department of Conservation offices.

We further petition Council to protect the health and safety of ratepayers by undertaking independent water monitoring for poison residues following all 1080 aerial operations, within the parameters and time frames set by Manaaki Whenua /Landcare Research, and with public notification of the results.

Was it legal to store 1080 adjacent to residences and food and beverage outlets? Who knew about this storage? Who was notified? Who should have been notified?

We request that the answers to these all these questions are made public.

READ MORE

https://www.toko.org.nz/petitions/monitoring-of-whitianga-s-town-water-supply?source=facebook-share-button&time=1509837016

Vaccines while pregnant injured my daughter

Not a good idea to vaccinate in utero, we’ve had other vids about this. The foetal brain is still undeveloped and there are no guarantees for safety. Remember the companies are protected, not you.

Streamed live on Sep 6, 2017


RELATED

If you’re pregnant and thinking of getting the TDaP vaccine, you might want to watch this video and reconsider. Medical bracelets, T-Shirts, Books or Stickers for sale: http://myincredibleopinion.com On Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/MyIncredible…


RELATED

CDC-funded study confirms flu shots linked to spontaneous abortions… vaccine experts rush to explain away the findings

(Natural News) A CDC-funded medical study being published by the medical journal Vaccine has confirmed a shocking link between flu shots and spontaneous abortions in pregnant women. The study was rejected by two previous medical journals before Vaccine agreed to publish it, further underscoring the tendency for medical journals to censor any science that doesn’t agree with their pro-vaccine narratives.

“A study published today in Vaccine suggests a strong association between receiving repeated doses of the seasonal influenza vaccine and miscarriage,” writes CIDRAP, the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy.

“A puzzling study of U.S. pregnancies found that women who had miscarriages between 2010 and 2012 were more likely to have had back-to-back annual flu shots that included protection against swine flu,” reports Medical Xpress, a pro-vaccine news site that promotes vaccine industry interests. Notice that the opening paragraph of their study assumed the study couldn’t possibly be true. It’s “puzzling” that mercury in flu shots could cause spontaneous abortions, you see, because these people have no understanding of biochemistry and the laws of cause and effect.

“That study was conducted after the CDC made the recommendation 2004 that all pregnant woman in all trimesters get the seasonal flu shot,” explains CIDRAP. That’s because the CDC is primarily a vaccine propaganda front group that buries whatever science it doesn’t like while promoting the interests of vaccine manufacturers.

400% increase in miscarriages among pregnant women who receive vaccines

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-09-13-cdc-funded-study-confirms-flu-shots-linked-to-spontaneous-abortions-vaccine-experts-rush-to-explain-away-the-findings.html

1 in 3 FDA-approved Drugs May Lead to Death | AMA Journal

From myeclinik.com

A scathing post-market study on FDA-approved drugs conducted by some members of the American Medical Association has made it to the headlines. It concludes that almost “one-third of new drugs approved by U.S. regulators over a decade ended up years later with warnings about unexpected — sometimes life-threatening — side effects or complications.”

LATimes reports,

Researchers looked at potential problems that cropped up during the routine monitoring that’s done once a medicine has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration and is on the market. The results, published Tuesday, covered all 222 prescription drugs approved by the FDA from 2001 through 2010.

The 71 drugs that were flagged included top sellers for treating depression, arthritis, infections and blood clots. Safety issues included risks for serious skin reactions, liver damage, cancer and even death.

“The large percentage of problems was a surprise,” and they included side effects not seen during the review process, said senior author Dr. Joseph Ross, an associate professor of medicine and public health at Yale University.

While most safety concerns were not serious enough to prompt recalls, the findings raise questions about how thoroughly drugs are tested before approval, said drug safety expert Thomas Moore.

But Ross said the results suggest that the FDA “is kind of doing a great job” at scrutinizing drugs after approval.

New drugs are generally tested first in hundreds or even thousands of people for safety and effectiveness.

Surely, not one of those guinea pigs are their close relatives.

Among the drugs that were found to be life-threatening are Bextra, Raptiva, Zelnorm, and others:

… The study counted black-box warnings for dozens of drugs. These warnings involved serious problems including risk of death or life-threatening conditions linked with the drugs.

There were also alerts for less serious potential harms related to dozens of drugs. Among them: Humira, used for arthritis and some other illnesses; Abilify, used for depression and other mental illness; and Pradaxa, a blood thinner.

Three drugs were withdrawn because of the potential for death or other serious harm. They were Bextra, an anti-inflammatory medicine, because of incidence of heart problems; Raptiva, a psoriasis drug, which is linked to a rare nervous system illness; and Zelnorm, a bowel illness drug, which has been connected to heart problems. [1]

Source: 1 in 3 FDA-approved Drugs May Lead to Death | AMA Journal

 

The Secret Inside Your Cell Phone

Published on Mar 24, 2017

As new science fuels the debate about cellphone safety, we take a closer look at a little known message inside your cellphone’s settings and manual telling you to keep the device 5 to 15 mm away from your body. We ask why this message exists, why it’s so hidden, and whether Health Canada is doing enough to protect us.
Watch more: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uvdO0…
Get our newsletter http://cbc.ca/marketplace/watchdog
Like us on Facebook: http://facebook.com/cbcmarketplace

»»» Subscribe to CBC News to watch more videos: http://bit.ly/1RreYWS