Tag Archives: restrictions

“Dear Air NZ: I am appalled by your consideration of bringing in a so-called ‘Health Passport'” (updated)

A letter here from a NZer, Concerned Kiwi, to Greg Foran, CEO of Air NZ:

Greg Foran 

CEO – Air NZ 

Dear Greg, 

As a long-term frequent customer of Air NZ I am shocked and appalled by Air NZ’s consideration of bringing in a so called ‘Health Passport’ linked to the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, as will a very significant percentage of the NZ population.  This action would in fact be, according to the 1947 Nuremberg Code, a crime against humanity.  As such, I will no longer be using Air NZ and will be encouraging others to take a similar stance.  There will no doubt be very large numbers of Kiwis and international customers also taking this position with Air NZ as polls have indicated that more than one third of Kiwis do not wish to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, at least until it has been properly long term tested and proven to be safe and effective in the long term.   

This is absolutely not a position of being ‘anti vax’.  It is simply a position of being pro vaccines so long as they have been properly scientifically tested over the required period of time, to be appropriately safe and effective.  The position that Air NZ is considering taking on this issue is a gross breach of the NZ Bill of Rights even if the COVID-19 vaccine had gone through thorough long term scientific testing and been shown to be safe and effective.  However, due to all COVID-19 vaccines currently being in an experimental phase (as officially admitted), the proposed position of Air NZ is a clear breach of the 1947 Nuremberg Code (see enclosed extract from the Nuremberg Code below).  The breach of the Nuremberg Code comes under the section relating to being forced or coerced/pressured to take experimental medical procedures through having basic liberties (to travel) being removed if people refuse those experimental medical procedures.   

By taking this position of a ‘Health Passport’, Air NZ will not only be sure to lose a huge amount of business, but they will also surely have a deluge of high level legal action coming their way on many different fronts.  Pfizer, and every other COVID-19 vaccine producer in the world, have refused to make themselves legally liable for any injury or death resulting from their experimental COVID-19 vaccine.  That is very understandable due to the vaccines being in such an experimental state and thousands of health injuries and deaths already recorded around the world, according to official figures from the World Health Organisation.  Will Air NZ therefore be picking up this legal liability if it forces its customers to take this experimental medical procedure in order to travel on Air NZ?  I am quite sure they will not.  However, due to the 1947 Nuremberg Code, Air NZ will be making themselves open to high level criminal action if they enforce this policy and some people in NZ subsequently have health injuries or death as a reaction to the experimental vaccine.   

If someone takes the experimental vaccine in order to be able to travel on Air NZ, and they subsequently die or have a serious health injury from a reaction to the experimental vaccine, as thousands already have around the world, will Air NZ be held criminally liable for that person’s death or health injury under the 1947 Nuremberg Code?  The Nuremberg Code makes this situation of ‘coercion’ very clear, and you can be sure that major legal actions will be taken under such circumstances, and that Air NZ will be forced to legally defend themselves on these potential situations. 

Not only is Air NZ putting themselves at huge business risk and legal risk with this proposed Health Passport, they would be actively pushing the emergence a truly appalling situation of what can only be described as ‘medical apartheid’.  NZ polls indicate that a huge number of Kiwis have similar feelings on this.   

Air NZ needs to be very careful what it stands for on this issue.  I would love to be able to continue as a loyal customer of a company that chose to do the right thing on this issue according to medical science and according to basic human rights.   

Yours sincerely, 

Concerned Kiwi 

___________________________________________________________

BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
7 December 1996. 

CIRP Introduction 

The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide. 

This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body. 

This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided. 

This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients. 

The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics. 

The Nuremberg Code (1947) 

Permissible Medical Experiments 

The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts: 

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. 

Photo: Wikipedia: By G B_NZ – Air NZ 787 ZK-NZI at AKL, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=57983259

The Future of Vaccines – an investigative report by James Corbett

corbettreport 536K subscribers

TRANSCRIPT AND MP3: https://www.corbettreport.com/futurev… If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before. And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.

Ireland – ‘People with vaccine certificates to face fewer restrictions on life’ (right on cue)

Having just had the NZ vax roll out announced this item is right on cue. Can you see the script? The globalists are running most if not all the countries on the planet, from within the shadows of course … the script applies everywhere. In this case it’s Ireland.

Note they are downplaying the side effects, it surely is not what whistleblowers have been telling us. There were people in the trials died however according to the Irish officials the reactions will be ‘mild’, a ‘fever’ maybe.

RELATED:
1) Pfizer’s Experimental Covid-19 Vaccine—What You’re Not Being Told
2) MHRA urgently seeks software tool to process the expected high volume of Covid-19 vaccine Adverse Drug Reactions
3) Doctors issue infertility warning over Gates’ CV vaccine as it’s rolled out in Britain; UK govt says it DOESN’T KNOW what the effect of vaccine will be on fertility

EWR
___________________________________________________________________________

independent.ie

“The chief executive of the Health Products Regulatory Authority, Dr Lorraine Nolan, said it is “simply not possible” to say the vaccine will be “completely risk-free”.

However, Dr Nolan said if there are reactions they will be mild, such as a fever.

She said the probability of a negative reaction to the vaccine is less than one in a 100,000. She said this should be compared with the 8pc of people who end up in hospital with serious conditions after contracting Covid-19.

“The basis of the disease itself far outweighs any potential effects associated with the vaccine,” she added.”
_____________________________________________________________________

Government to assess impact of vaccination programme before deciding how certificates will be used.

Vaccine certificates may be needed to attend social gatherings or sporting events once the majority of the population are vaccinated.

At the launch of the National Covid-19 Vaccination Programme, Health Minister Stephen Donnelly said certificates could play a key role in the fight against coronavirus if the vaccine significantly reduces transmission of the disease.

READ MORE

https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/people-with-vaccine-certificates-to-face-fewer-restrictions-on-life-39869247.html?fbclid=IwAR3e23OzBfnNQhDAFR0JYqykDMd7UVFl3OyP4UbPodIhgseMBWPlr567Xro

Photo by CDC on Unsplash

New Zealand First wants quarantine shifted to military facilities, a long-term alternative to lockdowns – totalitarian tip toe?

Totalitarian tip-toe.. (a description used by David Icke of the incremental way the new draconian laws and restrictions are being introduced to us as a society). The ‘new norm’ so to speak, particularly for NZers who are proving to be willing participants. (Guns/protection gone, freedom of movement, speech & so on gone, freedom of choice of medical interventions going fast). And so we have the military now managing our health with strict quarantine now pretty much mandatory, and now the suggestion by Peters that we we be detained in a military facility is IMO ominous indeed. EWR

RELATED: Government boosts Defence staff at managed isolation and quarantine facilities, maritime border

From newshub.co.nz

“New Zealand First wants quarantine shifted to military facilities to reduce costs and is calling for a long-term alternative to lockdowns. 

The political party released its new quarantine policy on Wednesday outlining how it wants to prepare New Zealand for future pandemics, emphasising the need to consider investment in alternative managed isolation facilities. 

“Continuing to shut down Auckland due to COVID-19 breaching quarantine is a risk to community’s health and the wider economy,” the policy says. 

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/politics/2020/08/new-zealand-first-wants-quarantine-shifted-to-military-facilities-long-term-alternative-to-lockdowns.html?fbclid=IwAR1q92t6J7GhMkX02ZrBgYviYmQkEUsuqFep_eTiPZ2QA-OfKyksZUVnAHc

Note in this link, the increase of defense staff at the detention centers (commentaries are now calling them detention rather than quarantine centers … you’re not allowed to leave them until they say so. ‘If it looks like a duck’ etc applies here). Remember, the case for lockdowns, masks, school closures, ‘distancing’ etc is collapsing.

Further related, remember the Katipo exercises by the military just a few years back? We always said then, and were called conspiracy theorists for it, that we were being acclimatized to seeing the military on our streets. Read the article, it’s quite disturbing really. An assault on a NZ citizen occurred it transpires).

Reopening plans conceal one change that will change lives forever (Lisa Haven)

From Lisa Haven, an analysis of the finer detail of re opening America. We in NZ are facing similar uncertainties as are all countries. Will life ever return to the normal as we knew it? EWR

432K subscribers

See further info at Youtube

France tightens rules: cycling banned and jogging restricted during lockdown

from thelocal.fr

“Taking exercise is one of the official reasons that people are allowed out of their homes during the lockdown – along with trips to buy food, medical appointments, urgent family reasons and trips to and from work for people whose work is essential and cannot be done from home.”

Outdoor physical activity will be restricted to a radius of 2 kilometres from home during the coronavirus lockdown, the French government said on Thursday, while cycling is completely banned.

READ MORE

https://www.thelocal.fr/20200319/france-tightens-rules-on-jogging-during-coronavirus-lockdown?fbclid=IwAR21-9aBTlQS7R4RUX8rigsKsPAkfJRAf0uOwPIRcgBtPc3Lc5bOrjjSWKI

Image by skeeze from Pixabay

The War on Your Health – a movie from Gary Null

Much of what Gary talks about here in the info is already happening, given this was a 2012 post – things are happening fast, particularly lately.

 

Published on Jul 3, 2012

Progressive Radio Network presents A Gary Null Production WAR ON HEALTH: The FDA’s Cult of Tyranny Introduced by the director (from his speech at the world premiere in New York City, June 15, 2012) In the near future, American medical practice may change dramatically for the worse. No longer will maximal dose natural supplements—vitamins, natural compounds, and scientifically proven medicinal herbs—be available over the counter in local health and grocery stores. Holistic practice, which relies upon non-prescription natural treatments instead of Big Pharma drugs prescribed life-long, will diminish. American healthcare will be imprisoned, patients will be forced to abide by a single medical paradigm defined by corporate drug and food executives and dictated by a government enforcement agency, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This is the bleak scenario if the FDA succeeds in limiting Americans’ options to prevent and treat diseases. ‘War on Health’ is the first documentary detailing and challenging the FDA agenda and its allegiance with the international Codex Alimentarius, which hopes to establish a monolithic food and health regime. Betraying its founding mandate to assure drug, food and chemical safety in the interests of public health, the FDA today is a repressive bureaucracy serving pharmaceutical and agricultural greed and profits. Vaccines, medical devices, prescription drugs are fast tracked at alarming rates through the FDA at the expense of scientific oversight to assure their efficacy and safety. The result is hundreds of thousands premature deaths annually from pharmaceutical drugs, vaccines and medical devices and an epidemic of medical incompetence and fraud sanctioned by federal health officials. Featuring many pioneering American and European attorneys, physicians, medical researchers and advocates of health freedom, War on Health lifts the veil on FDA’s militaristic operations against organic food providers and alternative physicians. The film’s conclusion is perfectly clear: the FDA is a tyrannical cult founded upon the denial of sound medical science with little intention to improve the nation’s health and prevent disease. Written and Directed by Gary Null Produced by Valerie Van Cleve Associate Producer: Richard Gale Editor: Richie Williamson Offline Editing: Valerie Van Cleve, L.A. Jones Camera Operators: Marcello Coppuchino, Peter Bonilla, David Grier, L.A. Jones Gregory Jason Russ, Jake Hammer Mesmire, Edson Tanakae, Valerie Van Cleve, Richie Williamson

“Public should not have been excluded”: more on the Council front, this time Napier

Familiar story isn’t it? Public excluded. Causing ongoing controversy everywhere. What 14484651_1472593802754892_3596900895775183479_n.jpgare they hiding? Oh, that’s right. Sensitive information. Sure. It’s not rocket science is it with everything else that they’re making headlines for these days? Especially recent revelations on the developers’ & fire sale prices in the Horowhenua.  Anyway, this one is on the topic of a Councilor’s personal safety & water.  That clean green stuff we’re known for internationally, right? That’s found in possibly just 40% of our rivers now. Oh well, business is good, and that’s the main thing isn’t it? On the safety topic, that’s a growing issue too as some Horowhenua folk found out when they decided in 2016 to highlight Council’s role in polluting the local waterways. Same happened to a Councilor for doing the same in 2004. Interesting times people.
EnvirowatchRangitikei



From Stuff.co.nz

The public should not have been excluded from a council meeting in which a city’s drinking water supply was discussed, the Ombudsman’s office has found.

Napier City Council excluded the public from attending all items of its Audit and Risk Committee meeting on December 7 last year. The major item on the agenda was titled ‘Update on Water Supply – Drinking Water Quality Improvements’.

The meeting was held just three days after the council told ratepayers they needed to urgently cut down on water use as water levels were about to run out, and just weeks after Stuff had revealed that the council was failing to meet national Drinking Water Standards that had been in place since 2008.

https://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/hawkes-bay/103531119/public-should-not-have-been-excluded-from-napier-council-meeting-says-ombudsman

Are there Genetically Engineered Foods in NZ?

Read ‘Seeds of Distrust’ by Nicky Hager on the story of the GE COVER UP Kiwis. They planted many crops of GE corn throughout our clean green paradise and it was left to full harvest so ‘no worries’ then by the esteemed leaders about cross contamination to other NON GE crops. Corngate it was called, courtesy of HELEN CLARKE who worked at the UN on Global Governance (aka New World Order – think Agenda 2030) after leaving her job leading your country. Do you still really think it matters which party is in the saddle?
EnvirowatchRangitikei


From nzhealth.net.nz

Dangers of Genetically Engineered Foods

Genetically engineered foods containing genes derived from animals, fish, insects and bacteria are now being imported into New Zealand. The genetic changes that have been made to these foods are completely different to those resulting from traditional breeding methods. Yet, the import and sale of these foods is being permitted without proper assessment of the risks and without adequately informing the public, even though many scientists say that genetically modified foods could cause serious damage to health and the environment. Genetic technology has already caused human fatalities, new toxins and allergies, soil infertility, animal ill health, financial losses for farmers, and environmental damage in the US.

The process of genetic engineering introduces dangerous new allergens and fatal toxins into foods that were previously naturally safe. Already, one genetically engineered soybean was found to cause severe allergic reactions, and bacteria genetically engineered to produce large amounts of the food supplement tryptophan, have produced toxic contaminants that killed 37 people and permanently disabled 1,500 in USA.

It is estimated that about 57% of research by biotechnology companies is on the development of herbicide-resistant plants and that this will lead to increased use of herbicides, resulting in even higher concentrations of chemicals in food and in the water run-off from the land. Other dangers include the creation of herbicide-resistant weeds, the spread of diseases across species barriers. The artificially induced traits and inevitable.

Imperfections will be passed to all subsequent generations and to related and unrelated organisms. They can never be recalled or contained. The consequences are incalculable.

What foods are here already?

Genetically modified foods (GMFs) available, or about to appear, in New Zealand shops include tomatoes, yeast, corn, and soya (which is used in many processed foods, such as bread, pasta, confectionery, ice cream, pies, biscuits, margarine, meat products and vegetarian meat substitutes).

Genetically modified organisms are also used to produce cheeses and many other processed foods. But this is just the beginning. In a few years, if transnational biotech companies are allowed a free hand, it may be almost impossible to find natural food. GMFs area also reaching NZ supermarkets because they are being introduced in USA Canada and Japan far more freely and are entering the food chain through global trade. Over 4,000 field projects are in progress worldwide, so basically the market is about to be flooded with genetically modified products.

New ANZFA rules bypass New Zealand sovereignty

Genetically Modified foods and food additives will be sold in New Zealand without labelling and without warning the public because they have been approved by a small committee based in Canberra. New arrangements introduced under CER, effective from July 1st 1996, mean that decisions about New Zealand food standards are now made by the Australia New Zealand Food Authority (ANZFA), a committee on which New Zealand has representation equivalent to that of ‘other Australian States’.

READ MORE

http://www.nzhealth.net.nz/environment/poisons/genetic_foods.shtml