Tag Archives: Reporting

Have you recently received a CV 19 VX in NZ? Please consider reporting any adverse reactions, you don’t need a Dr to do it for you

The Health Forum NZ fb page

PLEASE COPY AND PASTE THIS AND SEND IT TO EVERYONE YOU COME ACROSS WHO IS SPEAKING OF ANY KIND OF ADVERSE REACTION TO THE Covid 19 vaccination in New Zealand.

Have you recently received a Covid 19 vaccination in New Zealand? Have you experienced a reaction to your vaccination; or developed a new medical condition in the weeks after your vaccination?
Has someone you know, received the covid 19 vaccination and passed away suddenly and unexpectedly in the weeks following the vaccination? All of these events may potentially be linked in some way with the vaccination.
In New Zealand we have a voluntary reporting system for vaccine adverse events. It is called CARM or the Centre for Adverse Reaction Monitoring. Less than 5% of all injuries and reactions are ever reported to this system.
In New Zealand the Pfizer Covid 19 vaccine has only PROVISIONAL CONSENT for use. There are still 58 provisions for which Medsafe requires further information from Pfizer. Many of these conditions relate to safety, potential adverse reactions and dangers; and vaccine purity questions. It is very important that ALL adverse reactions to this new vaccine are reported for safety monitoring.
There is no medium and long term safety data for this vaccine. Safety trials are not due to be completed for another two years.
Reporting adverse reactions is a vital part of building a clear picture of immediate and potential risks for this novel vaccine.
If YOU have a reaction after your vaccination it is also VITAL for YOU to report your reaction. If there is a longer term decline in your health, you will be expected to apply to ACC for financial support. If you have not reported your original vaccine reaction, you will be at a significant disadvantage.
YOU CAN REPORT YOUR REACTION YOURSELF ONLINE. YOU DO NOT NEED A DOCTOR TO AGREE TO DO IT FOR YOU.

Please report your Adverse reaction to CARM online at:
https://nzphvc.otago.ac.nz/reporting/

We also have a New Zealand Citizens database, created by lawyer Sue Grey, in response to her awareness of under reporting to CARM. This confidential data base builds a community wide picture of sickness, injury or deaths post Covid 19 vaccination in New Zealand. After reporting to CARM, please also complete an online report to this Citizens data base at:
www.kti.org.nz
https://kti.org.nz/?cat=27

Please help to keep other New Zealanders safe by reporting your reactions, and allowing more accurate data collection for safety monitoring.

Photo: pixabay.com

How is NZ really doing since the CV injection rollout? – nobody hospitalized & adverse reactions ‘rare’ according to govt reports

So how is NZ really doing? We’ve had such glowing reports with so few ‘cases’ haven’t we? Ashley Bloomfield in press briefings tells us that no New Zealanders have needed hospital attention for cv vax reactions…. but…

The Health Forum NZ Facebook page gives a very different picture. This page which is well monitored, maintains a very high standard and has 6.5K membership with much feedback from people ‘on the ground’. That includes nurses working on the front line, who understandably wish to remain anonymous.

I have listened to & read the info provided there and gleaned the following:

Direct quote:

“I am personally aware (as a result of contact from individuals or family members) that there are a number of New Zealanders who have now had serious reactions including
*anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization;
* severe stroke (in intensive care)
* a seizure one day after the vx
*brain aneurysm, severely ill
* 6-7 unexpected sudden deaths within 48 hrs of taking the CV injection (temporally related to vaccination but not necessarily proven to be the result of the vaccination).” (Edited to include detail from video commentary).

Many nurses are reporting their colleagues are away sick post vax. None of those appear to have been reported.

Sue Grey has reported via a reliable source that a Manawatu nurse recently passed away the day after receiving the vax.

So there are injuries happening. Some are very serious. They are being told reactions are a good thing, that their immune system is responding.

Note, it’s known that only around 1% report, possibly slightly more in NZ, around 5%.

To report a reaction following receipt of the cv vax in NZ go to the link below:

nzphvc.otago.ac.nz

With 250K vaccines administered to date, NZ Medsafe’s reporting on adverse reactions stops at 27th March 2021

From The Health Forum NZ Facebook page

Today New Zealand has passed a significant Covid 19 vaccination milestone. 250,000 New Zealanders have received their Covid 19 vaccination. I saw the proud headlines today, so I thought I would just pop on over to Medsafe and take a peek at the latest Adverse Reaction reporting for this vaccine. I discovered a number of very strange and perplexing anomalies…

1) The latest Medsafe report apparently covers vaccinations administered up to and including the 27th of March. By my reckoning that was 36 days ago. NO SAFETY REPORTING SINCE THEN available for public view.

2) This data covers the administration of 55,143 vaccines. We have now administered 250,000 vaccines. WHERE IS THE SAFETY DATA FOR THE UNACCOUNTED FOR 150,000 VACCINES?

3) 443 non serious adverse reactions reported for the 55,000 vaccinations referred to in the report. These reactions are accounted for in tables showing what the symptoms were.

4) 14 serious adverse reactions reported for the 55,000 vaccinations. WHAT WERE THESE REACTIONS? The report doesn’t tell us. There is no similar table detailing the serious reactions.

5) Age strata statistics are also perplexing. They show that in the 70 to 79 year old bracket only 3 New Zealanders experienced mild reactions to their vaccine.

6) In the 80 year plus bracket, there are ZERO REPORTS OF EVEN MILD SYMPTOMS. Either elderly New Zealanders are remarkably tough and resilient and don’t so much as experience a headache, fatigue or a sore arm…..Or their reactions are NOT BEING REPORTED. Why would this be? Perhaps a large proportion of the elderly in these age brackets are living in institutional care and are unable to report these symptoms themselves. The rest homes, family members or doctors each have the ability (and I would suggest, the responsibility) to report reactions to this vaccine.It is also possible that older New Zealanders are not fully aware that when they feel unwell in the days following a vaccine, it could in fact be as a direct result OF THE VACCINE.

I am personally aware (as a result of contact from individuals or family members) that there are a number of New Zealanders who have now had serious reactions including

*anaphylaxis requiring hospitalization;
*stroke
*brain aneurysm
*unexpected sudden death (temporally related to vaccination but not necessarily proven to be the result of the vaccination)

Are these New Zealanders represented in these statistics? Or are they somewhere in the “missing” (from public view) safety data for 150,000 vaccinations administered but somehow unaccounted for (as yet) in the data. Come on Medsafe, New Zealanders deserve much more than this shonky data set, in order to evaluate their likely risk/benefit ratio….In order to undergo an Informed Consent process that is their medical right. So far, the reporting hardly inspires great faith in the system. https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/COVID-19/safety-report-4.asp
https://www.cdc.gov/…/info…/pfizer/reactogenicity.html

Image by Hebi B. from Pixabay

Image from Pixabay

CDC Privately Changed Their Fatality Reporting Guidelines, Over-inflating Deaths by 92.2%

Remember, the CDC is a private corporation & not a government agency. EWR

From GreenMedInfo

Originally published on www.childrenshealthdefense.org

By H. Ealy, M. McEvoy, M. Sava, S. Gupta, D. Chong, D. White, J. Nowicki, P. Anderson

Key Findings For Data Through July 12th

  • According to the CDC, 101 children age 0 to 14 have died from influenza, while 31 children have died from COVID-19.
  • No evidence exists to support the theory that children pose a threat to educational professionals in a school or classroom setting, but there is a great deal of evidence to support the safety of in-person education.
  • According to the CDC, 131,332 Americans have died from pneumonia and 121,374 from COVID-19 as of July 11th, 2020.
  • Had the CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting Revision 2003, as it has for all other causes of death for the last 17 years, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2% lower than it currently is.

Abstract

The CDC has instructed hospitals, medical examiners, coroners and physicians to collect and report COVID-19 data by significantly different standards than all other infectious diseases and causes of death.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were instituted by the CDC in private, and without open discussion among qualified professionals that are free from conflicts of interest.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were additionally instituted despite the existence of effective rules for data collection and reporting, successfully used by all hospitals, medical examiners, coroners, and physicians for more than 17 years.

As a result, elected officials have enacted many questionable policies that have injured our country’s economy, our country’s educational system, our country’s mental and emotional health, and the American citizen’s personal expression of Constitutionally-protected rights to participate in our own governance.

This paper will present significant evidence to support the position that if the CDC simply employed their 2003 industry standard for data collection and reporting, which has been successfully used nationwide for 17 years; the total fatalities attributed to COVID-19 would be reduced by an estimated 90.2%, and questions would be non-existent regarding schools reopening and whether or not Americans should be allowed to work.

READ MORE

LINK: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/if-covid-fatalities-were-902-lower-how-would-you-feel-about-schools-reopening?

RELATED:

The privately owned CDC played up flu deaths in 2003 because the public was declining their advice on the flu shot

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

BREAKING: US HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES CAN’T FIND 32 YEARS OF VACCINE SAFETY RESEARCH

So this department overseeing the health of the public can’t find 32 years of vaccine safety research?  Time to get reading the independent research to date isn’t it? As many folk already are.

From jeffereyjackson.com

The 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act started the process to fully absolve pharmaceutical companies from liability for the injuries and deaths their vaccine products cause. In addition, the 1986 Act also removed the normal market forces and legal repercussions which exist to ensure safer vaccine products. By giving economic immunity to Big Pharma, it removed any incentive for those companies to maintain, improve on and guarantee the safety of their vaccines.

Instead, the 1986 Act put the US Health and Human Services (HHS) in charge of doing continued safety and quality monitoring of the vaccines comprising America’s recommended vaccine schedule. HHS was tasked with two jobs: to end infectious disease and to reduce the risk of vaccine injury. Specifically, the 1986 Act states in subsection a, that HHS shall:

promote the development of childhood vaccines that result in fewer and less serious adverse reactions than those vaccines on the market…” and to “make or assure improvements in…the manufacturing, testing, warning, field surveillance, adverse reaction reporting and researching on vaccines in order to reduce the risk of adverse reactions to vaccines.”

There was also a deadline for HHS to adhere to when applying the above mandated criteria. The 1986 Act states:

Within 2 years after December 22, 1987, and periodically thereafter, the Secretary shall prepare and transmit…a report describing the actions taken pursuant to subsection a…

Last year, Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) sent a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to HHS asking for any documents related to the work done by HHS pursuant to the mandate laid out in the 1986 Act. In short, the FOIA request asked for any reports HHS has given the US Congress over the last 32 years that show they are making vaccines safer. After HHS was unable to produce the requested documents, ICAN, along with Robert F. Kennedy Jr., filed a lawsuit. The lawsuit gave HHS three options:

  1. To give all the information as requested in the original FOIA request
  2. To give a credible explanation why HHS can’t disclose the information; or
  3. To admit HHS doesn’t have any documents which would show they have done what they were tasked to do

​In the end, HHS recently settled with what is called a court ordered stipulation, admitting the following:​

https://www.jeffereyjaxen.com/blog/breaking-us-health-and-human-services-cant-find-32-years-of-vaccine-safety-research

Photo: jeffereyjackson.com

New study suggests more than a quarter of scientific papers “spin” results

(Natural News) Headlines about health studies often leave people confused and frustrated, with a study claiming that a certain food is bad for you often contradicted by one that says the opposite just days or months later. When you throw the financial interests of various studies’ sponsors into the mix, it’s no surprise that many people take scientific studies with a huge grain of salt. However, even die-hard study skeptics are likely to believe new research that shows scientific papers regularly spin their results.

After reviewing 35 published academic studies of the phenomenon of “spin” or “science hype” in biomedical scientific papers, researchers from the University of Sydney’s Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy discovered that more than 26 percent of studies known as meta-analyses or systematic reviews contained spin. When they focused solely on non-randomized trials, the proportion skyrocketed to an alarming 84 percent.

The spin came in many forms throughout the studies in question. Some made inappropriate claims about results that were not statistically significant, while others attributed causality when it was not possible. Studies also used selective reporting, like choosing only to mention certain data in the conclusions, and some made inappropriate recommendations that were not backed up by the study’s results. There were also many instances of studies painting data in a deceivingly positive light, such as by writing abstracts that were overly optimistic, underreporting any adverse events, and describing the study’s design in a way that was misleading.

A lot of this spin was connected to outside influence on the scientists in question, and more research is needed to uncover the extent of this behavior. Study co-author Professor Lisa Bero said: “The contribution of research incentives and reward structures — for example financial and reputational — that rely on ‘positive’ conclusions in order to publish and garner media attention is yet to be addressed.”

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-25-sensationalized-science-new-study-suggests-more-than-a-quarter-of-scientific-papers-spin-results.html

TPPA – John Campbell’s real reporting on Ak’s 4th Feb protest + more video footage

 

Published on Feb 3, 2016  RNZ 

Twelve nations met on February 4 to sign the TPP agreement – Australia, Brunei, Canada, Chile, Japan, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the U.S. and Vietnam – one by one, in alphabetical order.Outside the SkyCity convention centre, a protest of as many as 10,000 people raged on, with people coming together to express their views.John Campbell asked them why they were there.


A plug for John Campbell here who I’m convinced was ditched by TV3 because he was, unlike most mainstream media, vigilant in exposing lies. Broadcasting truth. Refreshing to see him again with more real journalism. Genuine journos are as rare as hens teeth now with the media owned by a mere six corporations.

EnvirowatchRangitikei


 

Maori Protest


HS videos