Tag Archives: proof

So any death within 28 days of a COVID diagnosis is COVID, but 2,207 deaths within 28 days of a vaccine is coincidence?

Thanks to Hilary Butler for this observation, posted at her Facebook page. She’s drawn attention to a post by Richie Allen at a link below:

I’ve certainly been noticing, like others I know, the hypocrisy of our esteemed professionals when it comes to the alarming number of deaths and injuries, anything from 15 minutes to several days after the new injection, all being classified as coincidence. Question them & repeatedly comes the statement: ‘no proof’. No proof that is that the injection caused the said adverse reaction. No there is no proof, but how (il)logical is that? Even if we did accept it, then what of the precautionary principle? Wouldn’t the MDs whose oath was ‘to do no harm’, wouldn’t they hold off jabbing until further trials were done? Nowhere do I see these professionals racing to determine the cause of the thousands of adverse reactions (that just happen to follow the said injection). How (un)professional is this? EWR

Read the article by Richie Allen at the following link:

The AstraZeneca Jab IS Killing People & It’s Being Covered Up

Photo by bruce mars on Unsplash

Viruses: a different perspective (Jon Rappoport)

From Jon Rappoport

“Give us your huddled masses, yearning to be vaccinated. We’ll find a virus and say a vaccine must be produced.”

One research-estimate suggests there are 320,000 viruses on Earth that infect mammals.

This means: types of viruses. For each type, I suppose you could say there are at least trillions of individual viruses.

So we should all be dead. Long gone. But we aren’t.

First of all, there are what’s called endogenous viruses. They live in the human body and they watch television and they lie around and don’t cause illness. On sophisticated tests, they can show up, and researchers will mistakenly assume they’re doing damage. They’re doing nothing.

Then there are exogenous viruses. They come in from the outside, enter the body, and look for cells in which they can take up residence and multiply. The immune system notices, and either ignores them as trifling or mounts a defense to defeat them. These viruses can also show up on sophisticated tests. Researchers tend to (falsely) believe the mere presence of the viruses signals trouble (illness).

This is a massive mistake. So-called viral infection, if it means anything significant at all, amounts to much more than mere presence. A few particles of virus showing up on a test says nothing about actual illness. There must be millions and millions of a virus actively replicating in the body to cause disease.

And even then, a healthy and strong immune system could ultimately defeat this bunch of little doofuses.

That leaves who knows how many other viruses out there, never living in or entering the human body at all. They’re playing music or their version of baseball or finding warm condos in cows or sheep or moose.

Now we come to what-if type speculations. Suppose dangerous viruses are flying in from planets far away? Suppose they’re combining in caves and then crawling into the bodies of rock climbers? Suppose biowar labs are fiddling and diddling and cooking up altered versions of several viruses that will kill millions of people? CAN YOU PROVE THIS ISN’T SO?

READ MORE

https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/03/03/viruses-a-different-perspective/

Image by Pete Linforth from Pixabay

Irrefutable Film Footage Of Climate Engineering Aerosol Spraying (GeoengineeringWatch.org)

Don’t imagine NZ is exempt, well documented here also. For a long time. Continually denied of course. See this post for what your Ministers for the Environment have said about both its existence and claimed non-existence. Predictable flip flops. EWR

http://GeoengineeringWatch.org TO READ OR POST COMMENTS ON THIS VIDEO, PLEASE GO DIRECTLY TO THE ARTICLE https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/i… The geoengineers continue to ramp up their ongoing aerial bombardment of planet Earth. In order to wake up the sleeping masses to the war being waged against them in skies around the globe, visual proof is essential. Numerous forms of jet aerosol dispersions have been captured on film which inarguably reveal that elements are in fact being sprayed into the atmosphere. Footage of “on and off” dispersions from jet aircraft at cruising altitudes prove that what we are seeing is NOT CONDENSATION. ALL commercial flight carriers and ALL military tankers are equipped with a “high bypass turbofan jet engine”. This type of jet engine is essentially a jet powered fan and is thus, by design, nearly incapable of producing any condensation trail except under the most rare and extreme of circumstances. Even then, only a short, very rapidly dissipating, trail could ever be produced from a “high bypass” jet engine due to its design characteristics. This 2 minute video is exceptional and inarguable up-close film footage of an aerosol spraying assault. We must all make our voices heard in the most critical battle to expose and halt the climate engineering insanity. My deepest gratitude to Douglas Huang for capturing this extremely compelling video footage. Dane Wigington To support GeoengineeringWatch.org: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/su… To receive Geoengineering Watch updates, please sign up for our mailing list: https://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/n… To follow us on Facebook, click here: https://www.facebook.com/dane.wigingt… The latest and most effective GeoengineeringWatch.org awareness raising materials can be found at the links below: 2 sided color glossy informational flyers: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ads/ 20 page fact and photo summary booklets: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/cl… To follow the latest GeoengineeringWatch.org videos please subscribe to our four youtube channels below: Dane Wigington https://www.youtube.com/c/DaneWigington Geoengineering Watch https://www.youtube.com/c/Geoengineer… GeoengineeringWatch.org https://www.youtube.com/c/Geoengineer… Geo Watch https://www.youtube.com/c/GeoWatch

Asked for proof showing that vaccinated children are healthier than unvaccinated, the so-called science-based CDC offers none

Not surprising given the US has the highest vaccination rate coupled with the highest infant mortality. Go figure. Still lining up for your jabs sleeping ones? Do the math. Join the dots. Not rocket science is it?

From thenatureofhealing.org

RECLAIMING THE VACCINE NARRATIVE: “NO SUCH THING AS A SAFE VACCINE.”

Vaccines are not “safe and effective.” There is no such thing as a safe vaccine.

But you wouldn’t know it to listen to the narrative being reported in the media. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the agency appointed to hold the final word on health and safety says, “Vaccines are safe and effective. The science is settled.”

However, when asked for proof showing that vaccinated children are healthier than unvaccinated children, the so-called science-based CDC offers none, claiming that it would be immoral to do such a study, to withhold ‘life-saving” preventatives from the population. “Trust us. Case closed.”

But curious minds do not close and do not trust opinion without proof as infectious and chronic disease rates skyrocket in children. Concerned individuals who live by the Precautionary Principle want answers. They refuse to be the guinea pigs who offer up their bodies for experimentation.

The Original Study Between The Vaccinated and Unvaccinated 

Curious minds do not accept the status quo. They seek information to make informed choices. They look to the past, before the inception of the CDC in 1946. And they discover the first study by Alfred Wallace published in 1889 between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals for the first Small-pox vaccine entitled, Vaccination: Proved Useless & Dangerous.

The study’s conclusions  based on forty-five years of registration statistics concluded the following (p 4):

  • – That during the forty-five years of the Registration of deaths and their causes, Small-pox mortality has very slightly diminished, while an exceedingly severe Small-pox epidemic occurred within the last twelve years of the period.
  • – That there is no evidence to show that the slight decrease of Small-pox mortality is due to vaccination.
  • – That the severity of Small-pox as a disease has not been mitigated by vaccination.
  • – That several inoculable diseases have increased to an alarming extent coincidently with enforced vaccination.

The first two claims were proved from the Registrar General’s Reports from 1838 to 1882. The results were indisputable, presented in figures and graphs for the entire period, so that data could not be manipulated.

The author noted that during this time period, a decline in deaths from Diarrhea and Typhus was six times greater than the decline in deaths from Small-pox due “to more efficient sanitation, greater personal attention to the law of health, and probably also to more rational methods of treatment.” Other reports of the time, such as by Dr. Walter Hadwen, MD, agreed.

READ MORE

http://www.natureofhealing.org/reclaiming-vaccine-narrative-no-thing-safe-vaccine/