Tag Archives: Pfizer mRNA

Tragic adverse reaction to Pfizer mRNA injection leaves a Medical Assistant with heart damage & amputated legs and hands

Posted by the Health Forum NZ @ Facebook

Jummai Nache

Pfizer 1st February 2021

Severe Adverse Reaction: Amputation of both legs and more recently both hands, blood clots, Cardiomyopathy and more.

Philip Telling the Story of his Wife Jummai
This is the story about my wife Jummai. She is a medical assistant who worked in one of the clinics in Minneapolis MN, where she was instructed to take the Covid-19 vaccine.
After receiving her second Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine on 1st February 2021 she started to experience chest pain at work. Three days after the chest pains I took her to Urgent Care on February 6, 2021.
After the checkup, EKG and other tests, the doctor said there was nothing wrong with her chest and every test showed she was okay. She took a covid-19 test and the next day was confirmed positive.
Jummai and I were shocked when we received the result that she was covid-19 positive because she had not manifested any symptom before taking the shot. But we later accepted that perhaps, the virus and the vaccine together contributed to the adverse reaction on her body based on the report of the Infectious Disease physician that Jummai was asymptomatic. So Jummai followed the CDC guidelines but then a few days later she ended up at Fairview ER and then was transferred to U of M medical center.
The next day, 2/14/21 the doctor called and told me that her heart was deteriorating, her oxygen levels and blood pressure were low and she needed to be put on a ventilator. I gave approval for them to proceed with the ventilator as needed.

Jummai Nache with legs amputated following the Pfizer mRNA vaccine


The Infectious Disease Dr considered the test results, Jummai’s condition, the timeline of the administered vaccine and the onset of covid 19, realizing the vaccine might have caused the adverse reaction. But the Dr always concludes that this is just a theory which cannot be verified because they do not have testing equipment to clearly state that the vaccine has caused Jummai’s devastation.
Whatever the cause may be, my wife is suffering unbearable excruciating pain and permanent catastrophic damage. The consequences of the adverse event are as follows:

  1. Arterial blood clot;
  2. Respiratory distress—ventilator;
  3. Cardiomyopathy;
  4. Anemia;
  5. Damage to fingers of both hands and toes of both feet;
  6. Ischemia;
  7. MIS-Multiple Inflammatory Syndrome.
  8. Amputation of Both Legs and Hands
    As a result of the above complications, the Infectious Disease Dr decided to forward the case to CDC. According to the Dr, after going back and forth with the CDC, they decided to meet to deliberate with many experts around the country in which about 70-80 doctors met on a virtual call to discuss Jummai’s case.
    About 8 weeks after the meeting the CDC sent us a letter of their conclusions which stated that Jummai was infected with MIS-A and covid-19, but they cannot conclude whether the covid-19 vaccine contributed for now.
    On one occasion, the doctor called and told me that Jummai could die at any moment, but God preserved my wife’s life in a miraculous way in response to all the prayers of the church. He has continued to do amazing things in her life, to which we testify.
    Three weeks ago, the cardiologist told us that Jummai’s heart is 100% healed. By God’s grace, this goes against the initial report which was that her heart would never be the same. To God be the glory! I have also appreciated God’s grace of healing her from the life-threatening impact of the vaccine/Covid-19 destruction, but it has required high risk surgeries for amputation of both legs (below the knees).
    When those are healed, she is yet to undergo amputations at both hands. My experience on this journey has been so difficult but I can’t imagine the excruciating pain mentally, physically and emotionally that my wife is going through.
    I can only equate her experience and challenge with Job’s experience and trial in the sense that the challenges have come in degrees, one after another. She would have one challenge and we would thank God as overcomers and then the devil would present the next challenge and we would overcome yet again. Time and again, challenge after challenge.

SOURCE: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=124378846536209&set=a.110264907947603

NZ: The Whanganui DHB is bringing the CV VX to the doors of the ‘disabled, frail & elderly’

World wide the call has been to send teams door to door (in some places accompanied by the military or the Police) to administer the CV VX.

The Whanganui DHB is ‘getting the vx to the vulnerable’ by sending a team of two to your door. The ‘disabled, frail or elderly’ who can’t make it to the clinic. The team will be increased to four in August and so far 20,000 doses have been delivered in the Whanganui area.

Read the facebook news item at this link.

Should you be unaware of the list of full, possible side effects provided by the FDA, which note, exceed considerably the list provided on the NZ health website see details below.

Here are those supplied by the authorities in NZ:

The most common reported reactions are:

  • pain or swelling at the injection site
  • feeling tired or fatigued
  • headache
  • muscle aches
  • chills
  • joint pain
  • fever
  • redness at the injection site
  • nausea.

Uncommon side effects

In the clinical trials, uncommon side effects were reported in every 1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000 people. These include:

  • enlarged lymph nodes
  • feeling unwell
  • pain in limb
  • insomnia
  • itching at injection site

https://www.health.govt.nz/our-work/diseases-and-conditions/covid-19-novel-coronavirus/covid-19-vaccines/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects-and-reactions?fbclid=IwAR2N3PjfP5j23idAFNVCt7KGhJhS1EuCwfMdMiA4mR0VFs9pQc17Ey_K6CQ#side-effects

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION LISTED BY THE FDA

This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis,

Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy,

Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes,

Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,

Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain,

Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, Vaccine enhanced disease.

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download (see page 17)

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death. Below are the deaths & injuries reported to the official government data bases that occurred after taking the covid-19 injection. Remember only 1% on average are reporting.

CURRENT DEATH & INJURY STATS REPORTED:

USA: DEATHS – 9,048 INJURIES: 520,747 (to July 2 )

UK: 1,403 DEATHS – INJURIES 1,007,253 (to June 23)

EUROPE: 17,503 – INJURIES 1,687,527 (to July 3)

AUSTRALIA – 313 DEATHS – 24000 INJURIES (to 20 June)

For the articles on the deaths and injuries cited, go to the news page and at the right hand column, click on the images stating the stats.

Photo: Google maps

The actual contents inside Pfizer vials exposed!

Rumble — “Scientists have examined the Pfizer ‘vaccine’, and what they found was HORRIFIC…It’s Poison!”

www.StewPeters.tv | www.DrJaneRuby.com

WATCH/LISTEN AT THE LINK

https://rumble.com/vjgmj9-breaking-discovery-the-actual-contents-inside-pfizer-vials-exposed.html?mref=6zof&mrefc=2
___________________________________________________________

Below is an additional article on topic by Mark Crispin Miller:

Those “vaccines” are 99% GRAPHENE OXIDE

“The toxicity of graphene oxide is reason enough to stop the global vaccination program.”

Amen to that; and, as we push for an immediate end to those injections, because of their high graphene oxide content, we also need to spread the word that those paper masks are also treated with graphene—a fact that made some few headlines in April, when Health Canada banned the wearing of such masks in schools and daycare facilities throughout Quebec. Here are two detailed pieces on the dangers of graphene inhalation:
https://www.aier.org/article/the-dangers-of-masks/
https://newatlas.com/graphene-bad-for-environment-toxic-for-humans/31851/

(And here, just for giggles, is USA Today’s niggling “fact-check” from last fall, which only reconfirms the danger it was meant to wave away:
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2020/11/11/fact-check-masks-dont-lead-lung-cancer-but-some-include-chemicals/6176080002/)

Image: Kane lab/Brown University

So there’s graphene in those “vaccines” that many millions have been led to think will save them from COVID-19, and there’s also graphene on the masks that many millions have been wearing for months and months, thinking that such self-suffocation will protect them from COVID-19; and there’s also graphene on the PCR swabs that have been shoved up many millions of tense noses, ostensibly to test for COVID-19. Check out this (fittingly) breathless item from Graphene-info.com:
https://www.graphene-info.com/new-graphene-biosensor-can-detect-sars-cov-2-under-minute

Thus COVID-19 World is all about graphene—a toxin that itself causes the symptoms of both COVID-19 and the “vaccination” injuries that “our free press” is laboring to conceal.

I suggest that we think long (but not too long) and hard about all this—and that we do so while each sipping pine needle tea, which, as Celia Farber reminds us here, is a widely available antidote to what They’re (literally) banking on injecting into every single one of us.

Coercive propaganda from the BBC promoting the Pfizer VX for your children

From hartgroup.org

In a week of very worrying developments, HART has been particularly appalled by a recent piece on BBC Newsround promoting the Pfizer vaccine for children.

HART’s most senior doctors are in full agreement that this video material is heavily biased, makes a series of factually incorrect statements, could be considered coercive propaganda and likely breaches the marketing authorisation. It is particularly concerning that the main speaker in the piece – a public health academic – is not a qualified clinician. 

Of even greater concern, we are aware that it has been shown in schools. The bottom line is this: children are essentially at zero risk of COVID-19. Any justification for the vaccination of children must therefore be able to prove unequivocally that the cure is not worse than the disease.

READ MORE

https://www.hartgroup.org/bbc-newsround-vaccine/?fbclid=IwAR2OUCDhUyHA91_0xQEYx0fq_hnZTvgKvH9UBi59jCer6UuuRpeZOWTXhnk

Photo: screenshot

Norwegian Med Agency finds causal link between the Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA C19 vaccine & death “likely” in 10 of 1st 100 death cases of frail elderly deaths post-vaccination (Documents cited)

Read at the link (note you may need to click the link more than once for it to open):

https://mobile.twitter.com/andrewbostom/status/1402237041019133952

NZDOS speaking out: interview with Peter Williams on Magic Talk Radio – MUST HEAR!

30th June 2021

Some info on the censorship by the NZ government and disclosure of the adverse events… from a NZ MD! Deaths, strokes and more. And an alarm sounded about jabbing the children.

Listen at the link 2hrs 41 secs in: https://www.magic.co.nz/home/shows/talk/magic-mornings.html?fbclid=IwAR2zugVSKoKGNAKkr-iCNL9J54rGxM1DMlj6K061z54rxB7YM0lT-2Sb7M8

Two more CV VX injuries : stop trusting your governments people

A young Dental Hygienist and a 14 year old girl, both lives changed dramatically since taking the ‘safe & effective’ experimental injection. The Hygienist can no longer work, has multiple physical side effects including seizures; the 14 year old is confined to a wheel cheer and a feeding tube… what one can sense listening to these two testimonies is the dismay at encountering these horrific adverse events. Why? Because they were all led to believe the jab was safe and effective. And of course & understandably the dismay as they realize it wasn’t.

Remember, our governments are corporations. Corporations, by way of their own definitions and terms of existence, do not care about you. They are pretend democracies, parading as, is about all. They are in bed with the other corporations that run our countries. Please do watch The Corporation movie. You will find it on YT. It fully dissects and explains how corporations work. Their bottom line is profit.

“Today’s business corporation is an artificial creation, shielding owners and managers while preserving corporate privilege and existence. Artificial or not, corporations have won more rights under law than people have – rights which government has protected with armed force” Richard L Grossman and Frank T Adams

Remember corporations have been given total freedom from liability with these jabs. Why do they need that if the jab is so effective and so harmless? The Dental Hygienist here refers to all the organizations and departments she has reached out to. If she is like the other three women we shared weeks back, there will have been a response of stony silence. She certainly offers no evidence of their coming to the party.

In Australia as has been noted yesterday, the government’s been told to shut up about side effects and if they want compensation, the public will have to go to court. See how much they care? Can you see this suffering young woman for instance facing a court battle to get blood from the corporate stone? I don’t fancy her chances.

End of day, don’t take the killer jab. You’ll be on your own if you survive it and suffer an adverse event that isn’t death (which would obviously see you beyond help aside from funeral costs & good luck with those).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=PRyhxaD84gk&feature=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAR2-spByEwOrHdMgVRkcKR7V2lqcAh1WJBTi3ogEg81isDveD4aKPs8FzUQ

NZ Herald: “Covid 19 coronavirus: ‘Extremely difficult’ – New herd immunity estimates revealed”

The Health Forum NZ’s comment below:

THIS HERD WILL NOT BE IMMUNE BASED ON A VX…
the official messaging is now changing, and is much more truthful.
Until now all talk has been about reaching “herd immunity”….which was never a realistic possibility with the type of “non neutralising” VXs being rolled out….they do not prevent transmission of the virus….they instead reduce severity of disease for those who contract it.
All of the official lunch time updates (30 June) and the advertisements telling us we all have to do our bit to reach herd immunity….it was always just a fantasy.
Now we are seeing main stream media reporting the clear and realistic change in the narrative.
Note however….after all this….the closing paragraph regarding children!!

Read the NZ Herald article at the link:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-coronavirus-extremely-difficult-new-herd-immunity-estimates-revealed/2VJH24OL6QHB7V2XTMNFO35ASI/?utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=nzh_fb&utm_source=Facebook&fbclid=IwAR0zwwyLo-LNruDjBPByMFVqM6iGyVZCo4KBqpaVt7UR5kHvh7fclwg9XmM#Echobox=1624993452

Hear commentary from NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey @ the link: https://www.facebook.com/sue.grey.9469/videos/959484824837012/?notif_id=1625019757642070&notif_t=live_video&ref=notif

On a final note: Martin Harris from Uncensored comments:
“The government announcements on radio just changed: Until now they’ve been saying that the vaccine is safe and passed the most stringent approvals, today the message was “we continue to monitor all adverse reactions…”. That’s an admission of guilt, or as close as it gets!”

Well of course, the VX was originally touted ‘safe & effective’ … but with the death count unofficially at 50 that’s too good a proportion of just over 5 million to be considered extremely rare, given we’ve only just started the rollout.

The approval of Pfizer VX for teens “is not responsible medicine & is a reckless approach to children‘s health”, says a group of UK health professionals

This group of professionals is HART (Health Advisory & Recovery Team):

“HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts.  We came together over shared concerns about policy and guidance recommendations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic. 

We continue to be concerned about the lack of open scientific debate in mainstream media and the worrying trend of censorship and harassment of those who question the narrative. Science without question is dogma.”

We must not repeat mistakes from history 

It is shocking that as of Friday 6 June the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the use of the Pfizer vaccine in children aged 12 to 15 years old.

The MHRA apparently carried out a “rigorous review” and found that “safety, quality and effectiveness have been met”. Quite how they can be satisfied that the required safety standards have been met is unclear when this product is still at the research stage with only limited short-term safety data available and nothing yet known about any medium or long-term side effects.

The child clinical trials will continue to be monitored for long term protection and safety two years after vaccination. If serious, long-term health impacts emerge, it will be too late for those who are vaccinated now, who will have to live with the consequences. Already there seems to be a signal in the data from Israel revealing myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) described by the Israeli health authority as 1 in 44,000 16-30 year-olds, but with higher incidence in the youngest groups. This is not responsible medicine and is a reckless approach to children‘s health.

READ MORE

https://www.hartgroup.org/child-vaccination-irresponsible/?fbclid=IwAR0xmn024f4ZQ671nCG4Zuoy19jQ43AG26y_PO2HOqQcge2oDwIqXReE9zQ

Photo: pixabay.com

Inventor of mRNA Interviewed About Injection Dangers: he has grave concerns about the lack of transparency of side effects, censoring of discussion and the lack of informed consent

Story at-a-glance

  • Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology. He has grave concerns about the lack of transparency of side effects, censoring of discussion and the lack of informed consent that these bring
  • Free SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is biologically active — contrary to initial assumptions — and causes severe problems. It is responsible for the most severe effects seen in COVID-19, such as bleeding disorders, blood clots throughout the body and heart problems. These are the same problems we now see in a staggering number of people who have received the COVID-19 “vaccine”
  • The spike protein also has reproductive toxicity, and Pfizer’s biodistribution data show it accumulates in women’s ovaries. Data suggests the miscarriage rate among women who get the COVID “vaccine” within the first 20 weeks of pregnancy is 82%
  • Israeli data show boys and men between the ages of 16 and 24 who have been vaccinated have 25 times the rate of myocarditis (heart inflammation) than normal
  • The COVID-19 injections have emergency use authorization only, which can only be granted if there are no safe and effective remedies available. Such remedies do exist, but have been actively censored and suppressed

READ AT THE LINK:

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/21/mrna-inventor-interviewed-about-injection-dangers.aspx?ui=a0c4f64f8c29c8eee11503979a030c301541928856f6f673f655dbcc6044b4e9&sd=19000101&cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art1HL&cid=20210621_HL2&mid=DM916194&rid=1189175467&p4=20210203&p5=

Photo: pixabay.com

After 300 Million Injections and as Demand Wanes FDA Finally Issues Warning on mRNA COVID-19 Shots for Heart Failure

After injecting Americans with over 300 million doses of one of the mRNA COVID-19 bioweapon shots since December 13, 2020, the FDA has finally agreed to force Moderna and Pfizer to put warning labels on their shots over a “likely association” between the injections and heart problems, which they claim is “rare.” The warning comes as the vast majority of Americans who wanted one of the mRNA injections have already been injected, as demand for the shots has decreased to levels seen back in December, just after the shots were given emergency use authorization and were beginning to be rolled out. According to the CDC’s latest report published yesterday, June 23, 2021, “318 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines were administered in the United States from December 14, 2020, through June 21, 2021,” with only 12 million of those doses being the “J&J/Janssen COVID-19 Vaccine.” As we have been reporting throughout the rollout of these non-FDA approved injections, hundreds of cases of people suffering heart problems, including DEATH, have been reported to VAERS, the Government database that tracts adverse reactions to “vaccines.”

NZ Dr Emanuel Garcia M.D. Speaks Up: “I am gravely concerned about the roll out of the Pfizer vaccine”

LISTEN AT THE LINK:

https://odysee.com/@NZDSOS:2/Dr-Garcia:d?fbclid=IwAR1NoJUEpTP8E8gw4LYwKeKJw6vbVZzRWjKLr3wn0N9Q91l4cX8eFarfrRI

Channel profile picture

New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out With Science@NZDSOS

“Dr Emanuel García New Zealand doctor speaking out about the Covid-19 response from a psychiatrist’s perspective.

Dr García received his MD from the University of Pennsylvania in 1986. He is Board Certified in Psychiatry and Neurology by the ABPN. He has practised as a psychoanalyst, psychotherapist and psychiatrist for over thirty years and is currently working in New Zealand, where he emigrated in 2006 and is a dual citizen of New Zealand and the United States.

The views expressed in this video are Dr Garcia’s personal views only and are not made on behalf any institution or corporation. The information shared is for educational purposes only.”

NZ Govt announces ‘First teens, then tots’ for the jab: the thin end of the wedge grows ever wider

As those of us watching have predicted all along, they plan to jab everybody with this experimental injection. We knew this simply because the PM assured us the government has purchased enough of it to give everybody 2 doses. Note you and your children are in fact the experiment. Both the NZ government, and governments world wide, are not telling their citizens plainly that this is experimental and the trials (that’s you) won’t finish until 2023.

“Quite how they can be satisfied that the required safety standards have been met is unclear when this product is still at the research stage with only limited short-term safety data available and nothing yet known about any medium or long-term side effects” writes HART, ‘a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts’.

Note also the following points: it normally takes ten or more years to safely develop a vaccine and this one took less than 12 months; all the animals in the albeit brief trials died; if you express a wish to see the inserts or ask for the risks vs benefits you will likely be classed ‘anti-vaxxer’; your government, like all governments, has granted total freedom from liability to the drug companies producing the said vax, should you have an adverse reaction; it is very sketchy and vague as to what kind of compensation you may get also should that happen; your so called ‘health’ authorities have silenced all 32 medical professionals in NZ who have been trying to warn you of the down sides of this wonder jab … they risk losing their certified MD status for taking their Hippocratic Oath of ‘do no harm’ seriously; the jab does not guarantee you won’t get covid in fact world wide we are hearing of the jabbed contracting covid; the NZ government is warning you of just a few benign sounding side effects which include a sore arm and possible temperature, on the other hand the FDA lists 32 side effects one of which is death. That information can be found below the Dominion piece about which I write today:

Quote: “Cabinet had to decide to use the vaccine for under-16s, which it was expected to do later this month, while teenagers were expected to become eligible for the vaccine towards the end of the year, PM Jacinda Adern said yesterday. “The next step is for the government to review advice from the Ministry of Health about ‘the decision to use’, and we expect to make a decision later this month. Until that decision is made, youth aged 12 to 15 won’t be given the vaccine,” she said. (Dominion)

Note the words, ‘given’ not ‘offered’. The expectation is generally to be vaxxed, rather than be offered it.

Still, believe it or not, there are folk who cannot conceive of their authorities withholding from them, any important information about their health choices. Seldom if ever do we read of folk being given full information apart from that ‘it’s safe and effective’ as the cutesy little recordings we hear daily on the radio keep reminding us. That is the lying mantra and they have no evidence to prove it is. As stated in Pfizer’s own information, they have no long term data yet.

‘Later this month’ is pretty much here given we are already at 23rd of June. Predictions that I clearly recall for the arrival of the Pfizer vax were originally around July, then suddenly it was April then March. At the warp speed with which this rollout is proceeding (remember they quickly changed the law when challenged about the restricted provisional approval when challenged in court) I’m taking a bet this will all likely be done and dusted pretty quickly before you have time to put on the brakes.

Please look at the stats on our news page, right hand column. Thousands have died, millions have been seriously injured. Would you call that ‘safe and effective’? In case you are thinking, if it were true it we would be seeing it in the media, social media even. Well your government has all bases covered as I have personally discovered. Facebook will not tolerate the US’s own VAERS database evidence being posted on their platform. (That data is on the news page courtesy of Health Impact News’ methodical documentation, click on those images to go to their articles).

There is very little about alternative or independent research that does not agree with the government narratives that you can post on social media now. If you do you have to code it so fb’s algorithms don’t pick it up, in which case you are likely banned from posting for a few days to a month even. And mainstream media? Well they are full throttle pushing the government’s propaganda. That is what your PM called it. Sustained propaganda. After all if they let up you might think twice and not get the jab. We can’t have that.

Here is a link to the Dominion article:

First teens then tots, in vaccine bid

AND THE OTHER IMPORTANT INFO:

If you are considering the covid-19 jab consider the following info not provided by the NZ govt:

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION

This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis,

Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy,

Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes,

Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,

Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain,

Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,Vaccine enhanced disease.

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download (see page 17)

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death. Below are the deaths & injuries reported to the official government data bases that occurred after taking the covid-19 injection. Remember only 1% on average are reporting.

CURRENT DEATH & INJURY STATS REPORTED: (links to reporting sites below)

USA: DEATHS – 4,863 INJURIES: 262,521 (to June 24 )

UK: 1,295 DEATHS – INJURIES 922,596 (to June 10th)

EUROPE: 15,472 – INJURIES 1,509,266 (to June 19th)

AUSTRALIA – 210 DEATHS – 22031 INJURIES (to 27 May)

WHERE TO REPORT AN INJURY OR ADVERSE REACTION:

VAERS USA https://tinyurl.com/yunna9nf

AEFI CANADA https://tinyurl.com/9979wkyx

YELLOW CARD UK https://tinyurl.com/adkpffp7

AUSTRALIA https://tinyurl.com/3upfafaw

WHAT SOME HEALTH PROFESSIONALS HAVE TO SAY

Great Barrington Declaration

As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

https://tinyurl.com/y785dmak

Physicians for Informed Consent

https://tinyurl.com/2wmnkek7

NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science

https://tinyurl.com/kpvzuczf

DR SIMONE GOLD: ABOUT The CV19 VACCINE

https://tinyurl.com/h58nv7fu

America’s Frontline Doctors

An open letter signed by 32 NZ Medical professionals expresses concerns about the Pfizer ‘Comirnaty’ investigational vaccine for CV-19

https://tinyurl.com/v7jyze6p

57 Top Scientists and Doctors Release Shocking Study on COVID Vaccines

https://tinyurl.com/jt659fnb

8 MD s SPEAK ON VACCINES

  1. Dr. Nancy Banks – http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
  2. Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL
  3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s
  4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx
  5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
  6. Dr. Larry Palevsky – http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
  7. Dr. Toni Bark – http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
  8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo

Examining NZ Medsafe’s fine print around the CV VX

Listen/watch at the link to an analysis/commentary on the fine print associated with Medsafe’s info about the CV VX in NZ.
If you are pressed for time the info begins at 28 seconds in …

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKV1GJTG5js

Tribe of Kiwis
106 subscribers
Ep 8: This video analyses and responds to the 3 June 2021 update from NZ’s Medsafe re the safety and efficacy of the Pfizer vax. That update raises more questions than answers.
All SOURCES and LINKS are in the Show Notes below (click on “SHOW MORE”)

Time Stamps
0:00 Intro
0:16 Medsafe’s “updates” on the Pfizer vax
2:44 Vax packet inserts
5:00 Medsafe’s Risk Management Plan (RMP)
5:31 Anaphylaxis
5:55 Missing Information (MIA)
5:58 MIA: Vax during pregnancy
8:26 MIA: Other information
9:12 MIA: Long term Adverse Events
9:23 VAED: Vaccine Enhanced Disease
12:38 Ongoing studies
13:34 Vax efficacy; RRR v ARR
20:04 Shouldn’t Medsafe have another think?
20:22 Outro

All SOURCES: More Information and Credits:

See the SERIES “SHOW NOTES” here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N…
That document contains ALL of the LINKS to sources for this episode, as well as a PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT of this episode.

COPYRIGHT CREDITS (in video order) and thanks to:

“FAIR USE” VIDEO & SOUND clips
These are used for the purposes of education, discussion and commentary:

VIDEO: Dr Richard Fleming (5 June 2021) “Event 2021” [The Highwire]
Segments from 3:54:37 (re package inserts); 2:09:03 (re VAED); 2:10:15 (re RRR v ARR).
https://thehighwire.com/videos/live-f…

VIDEO: Dr Ashley Bloomfield, NZ Director General of Health (8 June 2021) [YouTube]
Segment from 10:28 ( re Pfizer vax for “pregnant people”)
https://youtu.be/a1pQMRzse_g?t=10m28s

VIDEO: Dr Peter McCullough (7 May 2021) with Tucker Carlson [Rumble]
Segment from 35:00 (re vax in pregnancy)
https://rumble.com/vgse6t-full-interv…

VIDEO: Dr Richard Urso (9 June 2021) with Teodrose Fikremariam [YouTube]
Segment from 12:15 (re RRRv ARR)
https://youtu.be/7SLojvRhOO0?t=12m15s

NZ’s Medsafe approves Pfizer vaccine for 12-15 year olds! With 6-11 year olds also in their sights!

Thanks to Mike for alerting me to this info…

NZ’s MedSafe have approved the jab for 12 to 15 year olds WITH 6 TO 11 year olds IN THEIR SIGHTS!!. Watch at your schools people … they’ve been KNOWN before to pressure kids in parents’ absence to take jabs. Fact. Be proactive & make sure your school KNOWS your wishes on this. In Canada 12 Year olds can MAKE THEIR OWN DECISION and those kids are not being given (same as adults) the full picture on the 32 odd side effects (see below), one of those being death, not to mention myocarditis. FDA’s data (see below also). Not just the benign ‘sore arm, temperature’ stuff that MedSafe are telling us.

“Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has welcomed Medsafe’s “very carefully considered” provisional approval of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine for children aged 12 to 15.” Parents, do ask to see documentation of the (very short) trials and the results. This injection is still experimental and trials (you are the trial) aren’t complete until 2023.

NOTE ALSO; “Director general of health Ashley Bloomfield said trials were also under way around children 6 to 11 being vaccinated”.

READ AT THE LINK:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/covid-19-coronavirus-medsafe-approves-pfizer-vaccine-for-new-zealand-12-15-year-olds/3D2OPZZLOPOOMXY6LJT43Z4F2A/#

RELATED: In the last COVID vaccine study they “…killed every last ferret … & you are now the trial” (Human Rights Attorney)

New research shows why we should not vaccinate kids (Scroll down to Dr Brian Tyson’s info)

OTHER IMPORTANT INFO:


If you are considering the covid-19 jab consider the following info not provided by the NZ govt:

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION
This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis, Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy, Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes, Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,
Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain, Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,Vaccine enhanced disease.
https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download (see page 17)

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death. Below are the deaths & injuries reported to the official government data bases that occurred after taking the covid-19 injection. Remember only 1% on average are reporting.

CURRENT DEATH & INJURY STATS REPORTED: (links to reporting sites below)
USA: DEATHS – 4,863 INJURIES: 262,521 (to June 24 )
UK: 1,295 DEATHS – INJURIES 922,596 (to June 10th)
EUROPE: 13,867 – INJURIES 1,354,336 (to June 5th)
AUSTRALIA – 210 DEATHS – 22031 INJURIES (to 27 May)

WHERE TO REPORT AN INJURY OR ADVERSE REACTION:

VAERS USA https://tinyurl.com/yunna9nf

AEFI CANADA https://tinyurl.com/9979wkyx

YELLOW CARD UK https://tinyurl.com/adkpffp7

AUSTRALIA https://tinyurl.com/3upfafaw

WHAT SOME HEALTH PROFESSIONALS HAVE TO SAY

Great Barrington Declaration
As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.
https://tinyurl.com/y785dmak

Physicians for Informed Consent
https://tinyurl.com/2wmnkek7

NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science
https://tinyurl.com/kpvzuczf

DR SIMONE GOLD: ABOUT The CV19 VACCINE
https://tinyurl.com/h58nv7fu

America’s Frontline Doctors
https://americasfrontlinedoctors.org/

An open letter signed by 32 NZ Medical professionals expresses concerns about the Pfizer ‘Comirnaty’ investigational vaccine for CV-19
https://tinyurl.com/v7jyze6p

57 Top Scientists and Doctors Release Shocking Study on COVID Vaccines
https://tinyurl.com/jt659fnb

8 MD s SPEAK ON VACCINES

  1. Dr. Nancy Banks – http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
  2. Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL
  3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s
  4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx
  5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
  6. Dr. Larry Palevsky – http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
  7. Dr. Toni Bark – http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
  8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo

Photo: pixabay.com

As the NZ govt is poised to inject our 12-15 YOs, note well that a 13-year-old Michigan boy develops myocarditis then dies, 3 days after second experimental Pfizer shot

Note to NZers: myocarditis features on the FDA’s list of possible side effects. The NZ government is not telling you this. See info below the article… EWR

ZILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN — A 13-year-old boy who loved Pokémon and playing video games is dead in yet another tragic, unnecessary death.

Young Jacob Clynick received his first experimental Pfizer mRNA injection on May 23. He received the second injection on June 13. His aunt, Tami Burages, posted a photo of Jacob’s vaccine card on Twitter. Jacob died just three days after the second injection.

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/06/21/jacob-clynick-13-year-old-michigan-boy-develops-myocarditis-dead-three-days-after-second-experimental-pfizer-mrna-shot/?utm_source=June+21+email

OTHER IMPORTANT INFO:

If you are considering the covid-19 jab consider the following info not provided by the NZ govt:

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION

This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis,

Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy,

Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes,

Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,

Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain,

Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,Vaccine enhanced disease.

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download (see page 17)

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death. Below are the deaths & injuries reported to the official government data bases that occurred after taking the covid-19 injection. Remember only 1% on average are reporting.

CURRENT DEATH & INJURY STATS REPORTED: (links to reporting sites below)

USA: DEATHS – 4,863 INJURIES: 262,521 (to June 24 )

UK: 1,295 DEATHS – INJURIES 922,596 (to June 10th)

EUROPE: 13,867 – INJURIES 1,354,336 (to June 5th)

AUSTRALIA – 210 DEATHS – 22031 INJURIES (to 27 May)

WHERE TO REPORT AN INJURY OR ADVERSE REACTION:

VAERS USA https://tinyurl.com/yunna9nf

AEFI CANADA https://tinyurl.com/9979wkyx

YELLOW CARD UK https://tinyurl.com/adkpffp7

AUSTRALIA https://tinyurl.com/3upfafaw

WHAT SOME HEALTH PROFESSIONALS HAVE TO SAY

Great Barrington Declaration

As infectious disease epidemiologists and public health scientists we have grave concerns about the damaging physical and mental health impacts of the prevailing COVID-19 policies, and recommend an approach we call Focused Protection.

https://tinyurl.com/y785dmak

Physicians for Informed Consent

https://tinyurl.com/2wmnkek7

NZ Doctors Speaking Out With Science

https://tinyurl.com/kpvzuczf

DR SIMONE GOLD: ABOUT The CV19 VACCINE

https://tinyurl.com/h58nv7fu

America’s Frontline Doctors

An open letter signed by 32 NZ Medical professionals expresses concerns about the Pfizer ‘Comirnaty’ investigational vaccine for CV-19

https://tinyurl.com/v7jyze6p

57 Top Scientists and Doctors Release Shocking Study on COVID Vaccines

https://tinyurl.com/jt659fnb

8 MD s SPEAK ON VACCINES

  1. Dr. Nancy Banks – http://bit.ly/1Ip0aIm
  2. Dr. Russell Blaylock – http://bit.ly/1BXxQZL
  3. Dr. Shiv Chopra – http://bit.ly/1gdgh1s
  4. Dr. Sherri Tenpenny – http://bit.ly/1MPVbjx
  5. Dr. Suzanne Humphries – http://bit.ly/17sKDbf
  6. Dr. Larry Palevsky – http://bit.ly/1LLEjf6
  7. Dr. Toni Bark – http://bit.ly/1CYM9RB
  8. Dr. Andrew Wakefield – http://bit.ly/1MuyNzo

NZ’s new “Clayton’s” Medicines Act protects nobody from anything

From NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey:

As a result of the government’s post VX Challenge so called emergency “technical” law change, any VX or other medicine can now be approved at the Minister’s discretion for everyone in NZ, based on an application that ONLY considers (a) to (h) below.

The Minister need NOT consider (i) to (p) which assess SAFETY, integrity and EFFICACY.

How can the govt adverts properly claim provisional consent from Medsafe means this novel jab is “safe and effective”. It’s now a “Clayton’s” Medicines Act that depending on the Minister’s whim protects nobody from anything…..

NZ’s Medsafe has belatedly published a summary of some of the outstanding safety and efficacy information about the Pfizer jab

From NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey

On 3 June Medsafe belatedly published a summary of some of the outstanding safety and efficacy Information about the Pfizer jab. This important information should be included in ALL informed consent conversations and ALL employer/ employee health and safety discussions https://www.medsafe.govt.nz/…/Spotlight-on-Comirnaty…NB what they still don’t say is that the benefit/risk assessment required for s23(1) considers mainly administrative type Information and does NOT include assessment of product safety, integrity or efficacy (that is why this process was only available for the restricted treatment of a limited number of patients until the govt passed an emergency law on 19 May 2021 to retrospectively validate this and a few other novel medicines which had incomplete safety testing).

EWR Note: for the FDA’s list of more than thirty possible side effects also not included in information supplied in NZ go to this link, at page 17.

Summarised below:

KNOWN POSSIBLE SIDE EFFECTS FROM THE COVID-19 EXPERIMENTAL mRNA INJECTION
This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US:

Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis, Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy, Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes, Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,
Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain, Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children,Vaccine enhanced disease.

Photo credit: pixabay.com

Let’s pretend this new emergency law applies historically

From Lawyer, Sue Grey:

Here is the tricky government maneuvering to try to retrospectively validate the provisional consent for the Pfizer jab ..

They say “Let’s pretend this new emergency law applies historically”!!!!! Whatever happened to integrity or the rule of law.

https://www.legislation.govt.nz/…/latest/whole.html…

Photo: Wikipedia

Another open letter to NZ Govt from Lawyer Sue Grey: URGENT REQUEST FOLLOWING RESEARCH SHOWING THE “S PROTEIN” IN THE PFIZER JAB IS A TOXIN

EWR Comment: note the research & video are included in the links. Must watch/read.

From: Sue Grey suegreylawyer@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 23:33
Subject: OPEN LETTER No 2- An URGENT REQUEST FOLLOWING RESEARCH SHOWING THE “S PROTEIN” IN THE PFIZER JAB IS A TOXIN
To: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz, Hon David Parker david.parker@parliament.govt.nz, Hon Andrew Little andrew.little@parliament.govt.nz, Hon Chris Hipkins chris.hipkins@parliament.govt.nz, ashley_bloomfield@moh.govt.nz, Chris James Chris.James@health.govt.nz, ayesha.verrall@parliament.govt.nz

Dear Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Minister of Health, Minister of Covid, Minister or Seniors, Director General of Health and Chris Hipkins.
I attach below some new and very important research which I must assume your advisors have not yet provided to you, or the experimental Pfizer injection rollout would surely already have been suspended.
It is now clearly established that the SProtein is a toxin that causes the harmful symptoms known as “Covid”.


I surely don’t need to explain the legal, ethical and human rights consequences of a government knowingly promoting a program which intentionally injects a life threatening toxin into healthy people.
I also attach a report indicating that injected nanoparticles (and the SProtein) do not remain in the arm muscle but instead circulate throughout the whole body.
The combined effect is that the Pfizer jab injects mRNA to take over cells to manufacture the deadly SProtein toxin and this spread throughout much of the body, manufacturing the SProtein toxin for days and in some cases many weeks.
This explains why even the limited available research from the two months of study as summarised in the Comirnaty Data Sheet identifies possible harm to many different parts of the body including the heart, blood, brain, musculoskeletal system, nervous system, fainting and dizziness etc.
This is no longer just a shocking experiment. Everyone involved is now on notice of this “injection roulette” which may result in death or serious injury to previously healthy people. The health and safety implications for employers and those who push this jab, are significant.
No post injection death can legitimately be ruled out as being caused or contributed by the injection, at least not without a full coroner’s report. Certainly any post vax stroke, heart attack, other blood disorder, nervous system disorder or even suicide or car accident (known overseas as “vaccidents”) must prima facie be assumed to be caused or contributed to by the jab, at least until a full coroners report is undertaken.
Similarly it is not good enough to claim that our seniors who die post jab were frail and likely to die. Surely if they were that frail they should have been spared from the jab. Anyway, surely “deaths post Jab” should be treated consistently with “deaths post Covid”.
Despite the secretive, flawed and very passive official post jab injury reporting process ( CARM), and as a result of the more active community led follow up, you are already on notice of a number of deaths and life threatening and life changing harm from this injection. The deaths and harm will inevitably continue if there are any further injections. Perhaps initially you had an excuse that you thought the SProtein was “safe”. However now you are on notice that it is not “safe” by any definition.
Further, although you in privileged position are on notice, many members of the public who you were elected to represent remain deceived by misleading claims in crown propaganda that the jab is “safe and effective”. In these circumstances there can be no “Informed consent”., Each jab without Informed consent is in breach of the Health and Disability Code and is an assault.
In these circumstances, the ongoing program is surely criminal, and indeed may result in Homicide as defined by the Crimes Act:
158Homicide defined
Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.
Compare: 1908 No 32 s 173
Anyone who aids, abets or otherwise incites homicide is a party to that homicide.
I note that the Director-General of Health has shared his view in sworn evidence that Covid is the most serious health issue for New Zealand in 100 years.
I invite you all to consider that claim very carefully and critically. Please put Covid in perspective against the many other challenges which we face, including for example heart attacks, strokes, cancer, suicide accidents and diabetes and the nitrate and other contamination of much of our water.
Surely you must agree that the harm is not from “Covid” but from the “Response to Covid”.
The best expert evidence is that the risk from Covid is similar to the risk from influenza. Many experts are now saying that Covid is simply a rebranding of influenza and colds, supported by PCR testing that was never intended as a diagnostic tool. The WHO says that PCR testing should not be used beyond 20-25 cycles. OIA responses indicate that in NZ PCR tests use up to 45 cycles, which simply multiplies any contamination.
Our government is about to enter dangerous new phase if it proceeds to inject more healthy New Zealanders with an injection that experts have established is toxic.
Apart from the direct harm to those who choose, or are bullied to accept this injection, there is considerable peripheral harm. This includes the contamination of our Blood Bank with SProtein. We can only speculate on the risks for vulnerable people who receive blood contaminated with this toxin.
Please stop and reflect. Please listen to international experts who are independent from Big Pharma and who are not invested in the Covid paradigm.
Please listen to the New Zealand scientific and medical experts who have put their careers and reputations on the line out of extreme concern.
Please correct the misinformation that this injection is “safe and effective” and “approved by Medsafe” when in fact it did not meet the statutory criteria that “benefit exceeds risk”.
There is no imminent health risk from suspending the program. Dr Bloomfield’s sworn evidence was that the risks were mainly financial and reputational.
Please find the courage to challenge whoever is driving this, and any who act on dogma rather than evidence, reason or ethics.
The future of New Zealand depends on your courage to step up and make this critical call for our people.
I urge you to listen, engage and act in the public interest.
Please put aside your pride and the dogma, and suspend this program.
I am happy to assist however I can.

Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc (Biochemistry and Microbiology), RSHDipPHI
Co-leader NZ Outdoors Party suegreylawyer@gmail.com
sue.grey@outdoorsparty.co.nz

http://suegrey.co.nz/?fbclid=IwAR3z3FDZN6wY1vUwzwctL7nNFCUtivUtTgILKDExaP8-KmKXa7KZFl2QqWA

https://omny.fm/shows/on-point-with-alex-pierson/new-peer-reviewed-study-on-covid-19-vaccines-sugge?fbclid=IwAR1Afx5B-UIluGhMUHDTrUBgXU83kZSondMDjW-mOr59r03XZkiifpcGHs8

RELATED: New findings on the spike protein, Dr Tom Cowan

Photo Credit: Screenshot

Just a few of the injuries & deaths happening : from The Covid Blog

Jovita Moore: Atlanta news anchor develops two brain tumors 12 days after second experimental Pfizer mRNA injection, still recovering from surgery

Lisa Stonehouse: 52-year-old Canadian woman develops blood clots in brain, dead 12 days after AstraZeneca shot

Kirsty Hext: 26-year-old British woman suffers 14 anaphylactic shocks in month since second Pfizer mRNA dose, encourages others to get the shots

Lynnae Erick: 50-year-old Canadian woman dead seven days after experimental Pfizer mRNA injection

Jennifer Gibson: Canadian woman develops Bell’s Palsy two weeks after AstraZeneca shot, encourages others to get vaccinated

Clive Haddon: 74-year-old Australian man dies in hospital after doctors refuse to treat him for AstraZeneca blood clots

6 COVID-19 and vaccine-related stories you may have missed in May

Ellen Whitney: “pro-vaccine” New Jersey woman suffers blood clots, collapsed lung 10 days after experimental Johnson & Johnson shot

New Lancet report shows Pfizer, Moderna et al. misled the public with deceptive efficacy statistics

From thecovidblog.com

Read the full article at the link… (below an excerpt from conclusions):

Conclusions

“In other words, the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer mRNA is 0.84%, 1.2% for Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, etc. Now let’s look at absolute risk reduction for some other treatments against COVID-19 as prophylaxis (preventative):

Hydroxychloroquine: 21%
Ivermectin: 5%
Povidone-iodine: 24%
Zinc and Vitamin C: 23%

Of course mainstream media have already dispatched their “fact checkers” as it relates to the Lancet report. Politifact published a word-salad, manipulative diatribe concluding that the Lancet report is “mostly false.” Bottom line is that Pfizer et al. publish RRR efficacy numbers, not ARR efficacy numbers. Laymen interpret 95% efficacy (RRR) as near-immunity, whereas the true 0.84% ARR isn’t sexy enough for publication and mass dissemination.

Lying and manipulation are norms for mainstream media, big pharma and their big tech buddies. All messaging coming from the foregoing entities must at minimum be taken with a grain of salt, or, preferably, ignored all together. The truth is revealing itself more and more everyday. The Gates/Fauci/Schwab cabal is crumbling. They are getting desperate. We all need to keep spreading truth, forcefully and unapologetically to ensure truth wins out.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.”

READ MORE

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/05/31/new-lancet-report-shows-pfizer-moderna-et-al-misled-the-public-with-deceptive-efficacy-statistics/

Image by GraphicMama-team from Pixabay

An open letter from UK GP’s to the English government, explaining why THE CV VX IS UNECESSARY AND POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS FOR CHILDREN

We wish to notify you of our grave concerns regarding all proposals to administer COVID-19 vaccines to children. Recently leaked Government documents suggested that a COVID-19 vaccine rollout in children over 12 years old is already planned for September 2021, and the possibility of children as young as 5 years old being vaccinated in the summer in a worst-case scenario.1

We have been deeply disturbed to hear several Government and SAGE representatives calling in the media for the COVID-19 vaccine rollout to be “turning to children as fast as we can”.2 Teaching materials circulated to London schools contain emotionally loaded questions and inaccuracies3. In addition, there has been disturbing language used by teaching union leaders, implying that coercion of children to accept the COVID-19 vaccines through peer pressure in schools was to be encouraged, despite the fact that coercion to accept a medical treatment is against UK and International Laws and Declarations.4 Rhetoric such as this is irresponsible and unethical, and encourages the public to demand the vaccination of minors with a product still at the research stage and about which no medium- or long-term effects are known, against a disease which presents no material risk to them. A summary of our reasons is given below and a more detailed fully referenced explanation is available.5

Risks and benefits in medical treatments
Vaccines, like any other medical treatment, come with varied risks and benefits. Therefore, we must consider each product, individually, on its merits, and specifically for which patients or sections of the population is the risk/benefit ratio acceptable. For COVID-19 vaccines, the potential benefits are clear for the elderly and vulnerable, however, for children, the balance of benefit and risk would be quite different. We are raising these concerns as part of an informed debate, which is a vital part of the proper, scientific process. We must ensure that there is no repeat of any past tragedies which have occurred especially when vaccines are rushed to market. For example, the swine flu vaccine, Pandemrix, rolled out following the pandemic of 2010, resulted in over one thousand cases of narcolepsy, a devastating brain injury, in children and teenagers, before being withdrawn.6 Dengvaxia, a new vaccine against Dengue, was also rolled out to children ahead of the full trial outcomes, and 19 children died of possible antibody dependent enhancement (ADE) before the vaccine was withdrawn.7 We must not risk a repeat of this with the COVID-19 vaccines, which would not only impact on the children and families affected, but would also have a hugely damaging effect on vaccination uptake in general.

No medical intervention should be introduced on a ‘one size fits all’ basis, but instead should be fully assessed for suitability according to the characteristics of the age cohort and of the individuals concerned, weighing up the risk versus benefit profile for each cohort and the individuals within a group. This approach was outlined last October, by the head of the Government Vaccine Task Force, Kate Bingham, who said “We just need to vaccinate everyone at risk. There’s going to be no vaccination of people under 18. It’s an adult-only vaccine, for people over 50, focusing on health workers and care home workers and the vulnerable.”8

Children do not need vaccination for their own protection
Healthy children are at almost no risk from COVID-19, with risk of death as low as 1 in 2.5 million9. No previously healthy child under the age of 15 died during the pandemic in the UK and admissions to hospital or intensive care are exceedingly rare10 with most children having no or very mild symptoms. Although Long-Covid has been cited as a reason for vaccinating children, there is little hard data. It appears less common and much shorter-lived than in adults and none of the vaccine trials have studied this outcome11 12. The inflammatory condition, PIMS, was listed as a potential adverse effect in the Oxford AstraZeneca children’s trial13. Naturally acquired immunity will give broader and better lasting immunity than vaccination14. Indeed, many children will already be immune15. Individual children at very high risk can already receive vaccination on compassionate grounds16.

Children do not need vaccination to support herd immunity
Already, two thirds of the adult population have received at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine17. Models that assume vaccination of children is required to reach herd immunity have failed to account for the proportion who had immunity prior to March 2020 and those who have acquired it naturally18. Recent modelling suggested that the UK had achieved the required herd immunity threshold on 12 April 2021.19

Children do not transmit SARS-CoV-2 as readily as adults, moreover adults living or working with young children are at lower risk of severe COVID-1920. Schools have not been shown to be the focus on spread to the community, teachers have a lower risk of COVID-19 than other working age adults21.

Short-term safety concerns
As of 13th May, the MHRA22 has received a total of 224,544 adverse events, including 1,145 deaths in association with SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Reports of strokes due to cerebral venous thromboses were initially in low numbers but as awareness increased, many more reports led to the conclusion that AstraZeneca vaccine should not be used for adults under 40 years of age and this unpredicted finding has also led to the suspension of the Oxford AstraZeneca children’s trial.

Similar events have been noted with Pfizer & Moderna vaccines on the US adverse reporting system (VAERS)23 and it is likely that this is a class effect related to production of spike protein. New UK guidelines on managing Vaccine-Induced Thrombotic Thrombocytopenia (VITT)24 include all COVID-19 vaccines in their advice. The possibility of further unexpected safety issues cannot be ruled out. In Israel, where the vaccines have been widely rolled out to young people and teenagers, the Pfizer vaccine has been linked to several cases of myocarditis in young men25 and concerns have been raised about reports of altered menstrual cycles and abnormal bleeding in young women following the vaccine.26

Most concerning with regard to possible vaccination of children, is that there have now been a number of deaths associated with vaccination reported to VAERS in the US, despite the vaccines only being given to children within trials and a very recent rollout to 16-17 year olds27.

Long-term safety concerns
All Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trials are ongoing and not due to conclude until late 2022/early 2023. The vaccines are, therefore, currently experimental with only limited short-term and no long-term adult safety data available. In addition, many are using a completely new mRNA vaccine technology, which has never previously been approved for use in humans28. The mRNA is effectively a pro-drug and it is not known how much spike protein any individual will produce. Potential late-onset effects can take months or years to become apparent. The limited children’s trials undertaken to date are totally underpowered to rule out uncommon but severe side effects.

Children have a lifetime ahead of them, and their immunological and neurological systems are still in development, making them potentially more vulnerable to adverse effects than adults. A number of specific concerns have been raised already, including autoimmune disease and possible effects on placentation and fertility.29 A recently published paper raised the possibility that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines could trigger prion-based, neurodegenerative disease30. All potential risks, known and unknown, must be balanced against risks of COVID-19 itself, so a very different benefit/risk balance will apply to children than to adults.

Conclusion
There is important wisdom in the Hippocratic Oath which states, “First do no harm”. All medical interventions carry a risk of harm, so we have a duty to act with caution and proportionality. This is particularly the case when considering mass intervention in a healthy population, in which situation there must be firm evidence of benefits far greater than harms. The current, available evidence clearly shows that the risk versus benefit calculation does NOT support administering rushed and experimental COVID-19 vaccines to children, who have virtually no risk from COVID-19, yet face known and unknown risks from the vaccines. The Declaration of the Rights of the Child states that, “the child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care,
including appropriate legal protection”.31 As adults we have a duty of care to protect children from unnecessary and foreseeable harm.

We conclude that it is irresponsible, unethical and indeed, unnecessary, to include children under 18 years in the national COVID-19 vaccine rollout. Clinical trials in children also pose huge ethical dilemmas, in light of the lack of potential benefit to trial participants and the unknown risks. The end of the current Phase 3 trials should be awaited as well as several years of safety data in adults, to rule out, or quantify, all potential adverse effects.

We call upon our governments and the regulators not to repeat mistakes from history, and to reject the calls to vaccinate children against COVID-19. Extreme caution has been exercised over many aspects of the pandemic, but surely now is the most important time to exercise true caution – we must not be the generation of adults that, through unnecessary haste and fear, risks the health of children.

Signatories

Dr Rosamond Jones, MD, FRCPCH, retired consultant paediatrician
Lord Moonie, MBChB, MRCPsych, MFCM, MSc, House of Lords, former parliamentary undersecretary
of state 2001-2003, former consultant in Public Health Medicine
Prof Anthony Fryer, PhD, FRCPath, Professor of Clinical Biochemistry, Keele University
Professor Karol Sikora, MA, MBBChir, PhD, FRCR, FRCP, FFPM, Dean of Medicine, Buckingham
University, Professor of Oncology
Professor Angus Dalgleish, MD, FRCP, FRACP, FRCPath, FMed Sci, Professor of Oncology, St Georges
Hospital London
Professor Richard Ennos, MA, PhD. Honorary Professorial Fellow, University of Edinburgh
Professor Anthony J Brookes, Department of Genetics & Genome Biology, University of Leicester
Professor Keith Willison, PhD, Professor of Chemical Biology, Imperial, London
Dr John A Lee, MBBS, PhD, FRCPath, retired Consultant Histopathologist, former Clinical Professor
of Pathology at Hull York Medical School
Dr Alan Mordue, MBChB, FFPH (ret). Retired Consultant in Public Health Medicine & Epidemiology
Dr Elizabeth Evans, MA, MBBS, DRCOG, retired doctor
Mr Malcolm Loudon, MB ChB, MD, FRCSEd, FRCS (Gen Surg). MIHM, VR. Consultant Surgeon
Dr Gerry Quinn, PhD, Microbiologist
Dr C Geoffrey Maidment, MD, FRCP, retired consultant physician
Dr K Singh, MBChB, MRCGP, general practitioner
Dr Pauline Jones MB BS retired general practitioner
Dr Holly Young, BSc, MBChB, MRCP, Consultant physician, Croydon University Hospital
Dr David Critchley, BSc, PhD, 32 years in pharmaceutical R&D as a clinical research scientist.
Dr Padma Kanthan, MBBS, General practitioner
Dr Thomas Carnwath, MBBCh,MA, FRCPsych, FRCGP, consultant psychiatrist
Dr Sam McBride BSc(Hons) Medical Microbiology & Immunobiology, MBBCh BAO, MSc in Clinical
Gerontology, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, FRCP(Edinburgh). NHS Emergency Medicine & geriatrics
Dr Helen Westwood MBChB MRCGP DCH DRCOG, general practitioner
Dr M A Bell, MBChB, MRCP(UK), FRCEM, Consultant in Emergency Medicine, UK
Mr Ian F Comaish, MA, BM BCh, FRCOphth, FRANZCO, Consultant ophthalmologist
Dr Jayne LM Donegan MBBS, DRCOG, DCH, DFFP, MRCGP, general practitioner
Dr Dayal Mukherjee, MBBS MSc
Dr Clare Craig, BM,BCh, FRCPath, Pathologist
Mr C P Chilton, MBBS, FRCS, Consultant urologist emeritus
Dr Theresa Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD, Director, Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd, Bath
Dr Jason Lester, MRCP, FRCR, Consultant Clinical Oncologist, Rutherford Cancer Centre, Newport
Dr Scott McLachan, FAIDH, MCSE, MCT, DSysEng, LLM, MPhil., Postdoctoral researcher, Risk &
Information management Group
Michael Cockayne, MSc, PGDip, SCPHNOH, BA, RN, Occupational health practitioner
Dr John Flack, BPharm, PhD. Retired Director of Safety Evaluation at Beecham Pharmaceuticals
1980-1989 and Senior Vice-president for Drug Discovery 1990-92 SmithKline Beecham
Dr Stephanie Williams, Dermatologist
Dr Greta Mushet, retired Consultant Psychiatrist in Psychotherapy. MBChB, MRCPsych
Dr JE, MBChB, BSc, NHS hospital junior doctor
Mr Anthony Hinton, MBChB, FRCS, Consultant ENT surgeon, London
Dr Elizabeth Corcoran,MBBS,MRCPsych,Psychiatrist,Chair Down’s Syndrome Research Foundation UK
Dr Alan Black, MB BS MSc DipPharmMed, retired pharmaceutical physician
Dr Christina Peers, MBBS,DRCOG,DFSRH,FFSRH, Consultant in Contraception & Reproductive Health
Dr Marco Chiesa, MD, FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist & Visiting Professor, UCL
Elizabeth Burton, MB ChB, retired general practitioner
Noel Thomas, MA, MB ChB, DCH, DObsRCOG, DTM&H, MFHom, retired doctor
Malcolm Sadler, MBBS, FRCGP, retired general practitioner with 37 years in Medical Practice
Dr Ian Bridges, MBBS, Retired general practitioner
Mr T James Royle MBChB, FRCS(Ed), MMedEd, Consultant colorectal surgeon
Dr Fiona Martindale, MbChB, MRCGP, GP in out of hours

Endnotes

  1. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9502227/Coronavirus-UK-Children-young-12-Covid-vaccinesSeptember.html
  2. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9285157/Sage-member-calls-children-Covid-jab-fast-avoid-riskresurgence.html
  3. Critical Thinking Assembly on Vaccines
  4. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/05/02/schools-back-mass-vaccinations-children-headteachers-saypeer/
  5. https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/Covid19_Vaccine_in_Children_FULL_document.pdf
  6. https://www.narcolepsy.org.uk/resources/pandemrix-narcolepsy
  7. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/dengue-vaccine-fiasco-leads-criminal-charges-researcherphilippines
  8. https://www.ft.com/content/d2e00128-7889-4d5d-84a3-43e51355a751
  9. https://gh.bmj.com/content/bmjgh/5/9/e003094.full.pdf
  10. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3249
  11. Illness duration and symptom profile in a large cohort of symptomatic UK school-aged children tested for SARS-CoV-2
  12. Post-acute COVID-19 outcomes in children with mild and asymptomatic disease
  13. https://www.hartgroup.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/COV006_Participant-Information-Sheet-16-17-years_V2.0_09Feb2021.pdf
  14. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03207-w
  15. https://science.sciencemag.org/content/370/6522/1339
  16. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/priority-groups-for-coronavirus-covid-19-vaccination-advicefrom-the-jcvi-30-december-2020/joint-committee-on-vaccination-and-immunisation-advice-on-prioritygroups-for-covid-19-vaccination-30-december-2020
  17. Vaccinations | Coronavirus in the UK (data.gov.uk)
  18. https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3563?fbclid=IwAR2v7qLBSWYOv4LdJB6ziwvzPaCvrvoaB1uzLQNRTMeCDkHHDo0a6Tsrto
  19. Britain will achieve herd immunity by Monday, according to UCL
  20. Sharing a household with children and risk of CO VID-19: a study of over 300,000 adults living in healthcare worker households in Scotland
  21. https://publichealthscotland.scot/media/2927/report-of-record-linkage-english-december2020.pdf
  22. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions
  23. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
  24. Guidance produced from the Expert Haematology Panel (EHP) focussed on Covid-19 Vaccine induced Thrombosis and Thrombocytopenia
  25. https://www.timesofisrael.com/israel-said-probing-link-between-pfizer-shot-and-heart-problem-in-menunder-30/
  26. https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-women-say-covid-vaccines-affect-their-periods-so-whydon-t-doctors-care-1.9754865
  27. https://vaers.hhs.gov/data.html
  28. https://www.immunology.org/coronavirus/connect-coronavirus-public-engagement-resources/typesvaccines-for-covid-19
  29. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-020-00462-y
  30. https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf
  31. https://www.ohchr.org/en/professionalinterest/pages/crc.aspx

https://www.hartgroup.org/open-letter-child-vaccination/…

Photo credit: unsplash.com

Right now pregnant New Zealanders are being encouraged to take the CV VX – meanwhile the MoH website offers no guarantee of safety

“We don’t have enough information” regarding pregnancy and the shot. Why is this not being emphasized? Note also this from a post featuring cardiologist Dr Peter McCullough: Something I want the reader to think about: Dr. McCullough said that during clinical trials for the “vaccines” pregnant women were not allowed to participate. But now ALL pregnant women are told to get the jab!! And don’t forget, these jabs are not FDA approved. They say it’s an emergency and that’s why they are allowing them without full approval!SOURCE

(EWR)
________________________________________________________________________

From Lynda Wharton, The Health Forum NZ @ fb

PREGNANT WOMEN AND THE CV VX …
WE JUST DONT KNOW
Right now pregnant New Zealanders are being encouraged to take the CV V.
They are informed by the Government to “speak with your doctor”….
And at the same time, there are numerous platforms assuring us of the “likely safety” of the CV V during pregnancy.
Please forward this photograph to all of your pregnant friends.
It is a screen shot of the actual information on the MOH website…
The truth in plain print right before our eyes:


READ THE INFO AT THE SOURCE

https://www.health.govt.nz/…/covid-19-vaccine-clinical…

____________________________________________________________________

EWR … FYI:

Here is a draft list of possible side effects compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US :

Guillain-Barre syndrome

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Transverse myelitis

Encephalitis

Myelitis

Encephalomyelitis

Meningoencephalitis

Meningitis

Encephalopathy

Convulsions

Seizures

Stroke

Narcolepsy

Cataplexy

Anaphylaxis

Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)

Myocarditis

Pericarditis

Autoimmune disease

Death

Pregnancy, Birth outcomes

Other acute demyelinating diseases

Non anaphylactic allergy reactions

Thromocytopenia

Disseminated intravascular coagulation

Venous thromboembolism

Arthritis

Arthralgia

Joint pain

Kawasaki disease

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

Vaccine enhanced disease

You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death.

SOURCE (go to p 17):

https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download

Photo credit: pixabay.com

A reminder that Pfizer is still testing their vaccine …according to their own documentation

Here is a link to a report published by Pfizer themselves. The report shares details about the protocol they are supposed to follow regarding the vaccine.

There is a table describing the phase 3 of the trial. The trial includes follow-up visits up to 24 months after getting the jab.

Here is another reminder that they started their trials end of July 2020.

That means their vaccine is not supposed to be ready for commercialization before August 2022, at the very least. You are a guinea pig!

READ MORE

https://greatreject.org/pfizer-genocide/?fbclid=IwAR1WKiPqUe1JKY85gKvvR-N6tcoQ8uHwC3t_El7nJNRrRgSUZWAk0a60DwA

Other recent headlines

Miami School Asks Staff Not to Take COVID Jab; Global Media Assault Follows; Pfizer Trial May Support School’s Concerns

You can be vaccinated with a PCR test (John Hopkins Uni)

ICU Nurse Speaks Out Against Sensationalized Third Wave

India’s “Covid Crisis” has been hijacked – The Mainstream Media are lying to you

Children’s Health Defense gives COVID JAB facts (everyone should know about this) (bitchute.com)

Dr. Fauci funds the organ trafficking of aborted babies, helping researchers graft baby scalps onto rodents – NaturalNews.com

Counterspin Ep. 02 – RACISM (rumble.com)


Some points of concern to consider with NZ’s CV response to date

From NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey @ fb

Here are some of my concerns about the C-V response.
I’ve used information from diverse sources to try to create a jigsaw puzzle which connects as many pieces as possible. I fully agree that some parts are not yet clear. It is a work in progress to try to make sense of a serious and confusing situation.


The starting points for me are:

1) The PCR test is unreliable

2) so called “Covid” deaths are deaths within 28 days of a positive PCR test. Many of these deaths are WITH Covid, not FROM Covid

3) the death rate in most countries last year was similar to the death rate every other year- and median age of Covid deaths is in the eighties- similar to median age of all deaths

4) since deaths started to be reported as Covid, there have been few deaths reported as flu or pneumonia

5) the Covid response is responsible for considerably more harm in NZ and many other countries than “Covid” -the mental health effects are particularly devastating

6) with or without vaccines, we are ultimately all dependent on our immune systems. The focus must be on how we can enhance our overall immunity and well being

7) the research showing the importance of Vit D is compelling yet largely ignored by our government

8) Research showing the effectiveness of Ivermectin on Covid outcomes and reports from doctors who use it, is compelling

9) The clinical (Safety) trials for the Pfizer Vax won’t be complete until April 2023. So far they have looked only at 2 months exposure

10) The safety data sheet and Risk Management Plan for the Pfizer VX identify serious and important safety concerns and gaps in safety testing

11) The risks in NZ from the Pfizer Vax are considerably greater for most people than the risks from covid..recent analysis shows 1/4000 are having anaphylactic type reactions possibly due to the polyethylene glycol on the lipid nanoparticles

12) The S (spike) protein causes an array of blood clotting and other disorders- whether it’s generated from an mRNA Vax, from the AZ VX, from covid or an injection of S

13) There is serious under reporting of Vax injuries in NZ and internationally. The NZ CARM database is secret and reports from it are delayed and selective

14) Pfizer has demanded confidentiality and a full indemnity from the government. If they don’t trust their product, why should we?

15) The first duty of medicine is “Do no harm”. The second is requiring Informed Consent to any treatment, which demands discussion about risks, benefits, uncertainties and alternatives.

The current government dogma fails at every level.
Only with open transparent sharing of information can we rebuild trust.

Photo: Image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay

Information you may like to read about the PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE trials (Physicians for Informed Consent)

Education: Pfizer COVID-19 Vaccine Risk Statement (VRS)

This vaccine has not been approved or licensed, and is still under investigation.1

Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine:
Short-Term Efficacy & Safety Data

  1. WHAT IS THE PFIZER-BIONTECH COVID-19 VACCINE?

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) is made from synthetic genetic material that is immersed in fatty substances, including cholesterol and polyethylene glycol (PEG). More specifically, modified RNA molecules that encode for a mutated spike (S) protein antigen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the virus that can cause COVID-19, are immersed in lipid nanoparticles. The drug is administered in two intramuscular 30 mcg doses, 21 days apart.1

  1. HOW WAS THE VACCINE STUDIED PRIOR TO OBTAINING EUA?

The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has obtained emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is currently investigational.1 The vaccine was studied through nonclinical data from rats and nonhuman primates, and clinical data from humans. The EUA was based on a human clinical trial comparing approximately 22,000 subjects who received the vaccine with 22,000 subjects who did not receive the vaccine (Table 1).2 The trial included a median observation period of two months; 50.6% of subjects were followed up for about two months after the second dose.2 The FDA states that due to the length of the clinical trial’s observation period, “it is not possible to assess sustained efficacy over a period longer than 2 months.”3

  1. DOES THE VACCINE PREVENT HOSPITALIZATIONS AND DEATHS?

Since only two hospitalized cases of COVID-19 were observed, the clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitalizations from COVID-19.3 See Table 1. The FDA states, “A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.”3

  1. HOW EFFECTIVE IS THE VACCINE IN ADULTS AND THE ELDERLY?

Vaccine effectiveness was calculated by observing the vaccination status of 178 COVID-19 cases, where a COVID-19 case was defined as the presence of at least one COVID-19 symptom and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test at least seven days after the second dose. In subjects 18 to 64 years old, the vaccine was 89%–98% effective over a two-month observation period.3,4 However, since there were only 15 COVID-19 cases observed in subjects 65 to 74 years old and only five cases in subjects 75 years or older, the clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to accurately measure the vaccine’s effectiveness in those age groups.4 The vaccine may be only 53% effective in subjects 65 to 74 years old and 0% effective in subjects 75 years or older.4 See Table 1. Subjects 65 years or older comprise about 80% of all COVID-19 deaths, and subjects 75 years or older comprise about 60% of all COVID-19 deaths.5

  1. IS THE VACCINE EFFECTIVE IN CHILDREN?

Safety and efficacy data was either not tested or insufficient in children younger than 16 years old. In addition, since there was only one case of COVID-19 in subjects 16 to 17 years old, the study did not have enough statistical power to measure effectiveness in that age group.4 See Table 1.

  1. IS THE VACCINE EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING INFECTION WITH SARS-COV-2 OR THE SPREAD OF COVID-19?

The Pfizer clinical trial was not designed to observe asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 or the effect of the vaccine on the spread (transmission) of COVID-19. Consequently, the FDA states that “it is possible that asymptomatic infections may not be prevented as effectively as symptomatic infections” and “data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.” Furthermore, “additional evaluations including data from clinical trials and from vaccine use post-authorization will be needed to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing virus shedding and transmission, in particular in individuals with asymptomatic infection.”3 Approximately 40% of SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic.6

  1. WHAT IS THE RISK OF A SEVERE SIDE EFFECT FROM THE VACCINE?

The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events during the two-month observation period to be 1.1%, or 1 in 91, in the vaccinated group and 0.6% in the unvaccinated group, resulting in a vaccine risk of 0.5% or 1 in 200 vaccinated subjects.2 Consequently, subjects who received the vaccine had nearly double the risk of a severe adverse event occurring in the two-month observation period compared to subjects who did not receive the vaccine. See Table 1. A severe adverse event was defined as one that “interferes significantly with participant’s usual function.”7

Of note, approximately 3,400 or 8% of all subjects experienced “suspected COVID-19” because they had symptoms but were not confirmed by testing for SARS-CoV-2; two of these cases required hospitalization, both of which were in the vaccinated group. These cases could represent other influenza-like illness and adverse events; 409 such cases occurred in the vaccinated group within seven days of injection whereas 287 such cases occurred in the unvaccinated group in the same time period. Only the cases that were reported as serious were recorded as adverse events.3 In the clinical trial, only 5% of all illnesses suspected of being COVID-19 were actually found to be COVID-19.

After emergency use authorization for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was obtained and mass vaccination began, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recorded about 5,000 “health impact events” among 215,000 vaccinated subjects (1 in 43) that, similar to the definition of severe adverse events in the clinical trial, prevented the ability to perform normal daily activities, including work, and required medical attention.8

Additionally, as there were only 11,600 subjects 16 to 55 years of age who received the vaccine,3 and since as of Feb. 2, 2021, about 1 in 31,000 people 15 to 34 years of age contracted a fatal case of COVID-19 in the U.S.,5 the clinical trial does not have sufficient data to determine safety in subjects who are 15 to 34 years of age. Per the FDA, “There are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine in subpopulations such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals.”3 And, because all subjects were observed for only two months, the long-term safety of the vaccine for any age group is not known.

  1. IS THE COVID-19 VACCINE EFFECTIVE AND SAFER THAN COVID-19?

The extent to which the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is effective and safer than COVID-19 is not known. The clinical trial indicates that in subjects 65 to 74 years old, the vaccine may be only 53% effective, and in subjects 75 years or older, the age group that comprises about 60% of all COVID-19 deaths, the vaccine may be 0% effective; also, in children age 16 to 17 the vaccine may not be effective. The clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitalizations and deaths, and the trial did not assess if the vaccine prevents asymptomatic infection or spread (transmission) of the virus.

Severe adverse events in the vaccine group occurred in 1 in 91 subjects in the Pfizer clinical trial. The CDC has recorded that 1 in 43 vaccinated subjects was unable to perform normal daily activities and required medical attention. Furthermore, for people 15 to 34 years of age, the clinical trial did not include enough subjects to be able to show that the vaccine is safer than the disease, and because the clinical trial observation period lasted only two months, the incidence of long-term side effects from the vaccine for any age group is not known.


REFERENCES

1. Hinton, Denise M. (U.S . Food and Drug Administration). Letter to: Elisa Harkins (Pfizer Inc.). 2020 Dec 23. https://www.fda.gov/media/144412/download.
2. Pfizer. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048): Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee briefing document. Meeting date: 10 December 2020. 2020 Nov 30: 38,46. https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download.
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting: December 10, 2020:14,16,17,20,24, 30,31,40,46,48. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting: December 10, 2020. Table 8: subgroup analyses of second primary endpoint: first COVID-19 occurrence from 7 days after dose 2, by subgroup, participants with and without evidence of infection prior to 7 days after dose 2, evaluable efficacy (7 days) population; 26. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download.

5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Weekly updates by select demographic and geographic characteristics: provisional death counts for coronavirus disease (COVID-19); [cited 2021 Feb 2]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#AgeAndSex.

6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. COVID-19 pandemic planning scenarios; [updated 2020 Sep 10; cited 2021 Jan 13]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html.

7.Pfizer. A phase 1/2/3 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of RNA vaccine candidates against COVID-19 in healthy individuals. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf.

8. Clark T. Anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine receipt. COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 Dec 19; [cited 2021 Mar 16]. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-Clark-508.pdf.

These statements are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as personal medical advice.

© 2021 Physicians for Informed Consent, an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization. All rights reserved. Apr 2021.

SOURCE:

https://physiciansforinformedconsent.org/pfizer-covid-19-vaccine-risk-statement/?fbclid=IwAR1iZ2He6sYTmIM3TdYL7vYCwFWATuSVrA2-CA8g8UhzT5Q4q74A5lqY464

An open letter signed by 32 NZ Medical professionals expresses concerns about the Pfizer ‘Comirnaty’ investigational vaccine for CV-19

NZ DOCTORS OPEN LETTER OF CONCERN
Letter by NZ Doctors with Concerns Over Pfizer Vaccine April 27, 2021OPEN LETTER BY NZ MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS
…… SHARING CONCERNS ABOUT PFIZER ‘COMIRNATY’ INVESTIGATIONAL VACCINE FOR COVID-19

We write formally to express our shared concern that:
A new prescription only medicine with s23(1) provisional approval, which legally can only be for the treatment of a limited number of patients, is being promoted for the entire adult population of Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Medsafe asked 58 questions, but the answers for most of these are not due until March to July 2021.
The clinical trials will not be completed until 2023.
Nobody currently knows how safe or effective this novel mRNA technology is in the medium to long term, but highly credible medical experts around the world, and even some vaccine developers themselves, are predicting problems and raising urgent red-flag concerns.
If any safety issues are identified in the remaining period of the trials the effects could be catastrophic for our community or a proportion that have already received the vaccine.
The signatories are mindful of their obligations to discuss risks, benefits and uncertainties of any treatment and to ensure informed consent of all patients before giving any treatment and of the other important obligations under the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers Rights. Our insurers have affirmed this obligation.
Compelling patients or workers to receive drug, medicine or vaccine which is still investigational would set a significant medical precedent, which would run counter to all international codes of medical ethics since the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and Declaration of Helsinki in 1952. The fundamental tenets of these include complete disclosure of the risks and unknowns to the participants in medical experiments; the obligations on the experimenter for care and after-care of adverse outcomes; and the freedom from coercion, stand over tactics and over-reach. This would seem to include threats of job loss, travel bans etc. Many patients feel pressured to accept this vaccine in the mistaken belief they may protect others due to representations in the media and/ or pressure from their employers, and that they may lose their employment or may be disadvantaged in their employment if they do not accept this experimental vaccine.
The signatories are concerned to ensure that the Ministry of Health, College of GPs and the Medical Council of NZ are aware of the above concerns, and that they are addressed with urgency to ensure the way the vaccine is being promoted to healthy people who do not require treatment is both lawful and represents best practice. We are eager to clarify that any patients injured by the vaccine will have acknowledgement and cover from ACC.
The signatories note that even the promoters of the vaccine do not claim that it prevents transmission and that public representations that the vaccine is effective for this purpose are misleading.
We do not accept that lay vaccinators are qualified or competent to partake in the process of informed consent to patients re this vaccine, especially as they have no medical expertise and no prior knowledge of the individual circumstances of the patient or their health issues. Any risk benefit assessment and consideration of alternatives is complex and requires a considered consultation by a qualified practitioner.

Ref: Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. Int J Clin Pract 2021:75e13795.
Signed:
NAMES AND MEDICAL COUNCIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS
Matt Shelton 17031
Anne O’Reilly 23539
Anna Goodwin 48183
Paul Butler 10712
Caroline Wheeler 17374
Tracy Chapman 29070
Tessa Jones 08775
Ulrich Doering 16398
Aida Hasbun 70825
Adeline Lee 22765
Cindy De Villiers 20053
Damian Wojcik 10754
Rob Maunsell 08554
Wellington Tan 09716
Simon Thornley 23706
Fred M. Timmermans, MSC, Dental Surgeon (Picton),HPI no 18BRMD
Rene de Monchy 08986
Mike Godfrey 07144
Samantha Bailey 40705
Emanuel E Garcia 40834
William J Reeder 07018
Sheetal Patel 27638
Graham H. Evans 36808
Tihomir Djordjic 23070
Matthius Seidel 32235
Elizabeth Harris 18284
Robin Kelly 10370
Reuben Tomlinson 40821
Anna Harvey 15766
Kate Armstrong 22941
Stephen Joe 11754
Fraser Burling 18908

SOURCE