OIA request from NZ’s esteemed Ministry of Health admitting Pfizer did not measure transmission as an outcome in their trials. (NZ Min of Health).
READ AT THE LINK
OIA request from NZ’s esteemed Ministry of Health admitting Pfizer did not measure transmission as an outcome in their trials. (NZ Min of Health).
READ AT THE LINK
No surprizes? The photo of Bill there shows him in his truer scamming light, shot from well circulated video footage of him rocking to and fro in court trying to fool the judge about what he didn’t understand about his monopolizing behaviour over MS. After that episode he rebranded himself as the philanthropist. Why would you trust this man with your health? EWR)
(I recommend you visit their site & peruse their news list … )
An investigation has revealed that the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation are the primary funders of the UK’s Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, and that the Foundation also owns major shares in both Pfizer and BioNTech.
The Medicine & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) extended the emergency authorisation of the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA jab in the UK to allow it to be given to children between the ages of 12 – 15 on the 4th June 2021.
Featured by the Health Forum NZ @ facebook
On a rainy grey Saturday when our Doctors Speaking Out With Science (NZDOS) are the subject of a media “hit woman”….it seems a good idea to take a look at what their stance is…https://www.facebook.com/michelle.maher.771/videos/1222713588177204
In a week of very worrying developments, HART has been particularly appalled by a recent piece on BBC Newsround promoting the Pfizer vaccine for children.
HART’s most senior doctors are in full agreement that this video material is heavily biased, makes a series of factually incorrect statements, could be considered coercive propaganda and likely breaches the marketing authorisation. It is particularly concerning that the main speaker in the piece – a public health academic – is not a qualified clinician.
Of even greater concern, we are aware that it has been shown in schools. The bottom line is this: children are essentially at zero risk of COVID-19. Any justification for the vaccination of children must therefore be able to prove unequivocally that the cure is not worse than the disease.
Read at the link (note you may need to click the link more than once for it to open):
This group of professionals is HART (Health Advisory & Recovery Team):
“HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts. We came together over shared concerns about policy and guidance recommendations relating to the COVID-19 pandemic.
We continue to be concerned about the lack of open scientific debate in mainstream media and the worrying trend of censorship and harassment of those who question the narrative. Science without question is dogma.”
It is shocking that as of Friday 6 June the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) approved the use of the Pfizer vaccine in children aged 12 to 15 years old.
The MHRA apparently carried out a “rigorous review” and found that “safety, quality and effectiveness have been met”. Quite how they can be satisfied that the required safety standards have been met is unclear when this product is still at the research stage with only limited short-term safety data available and nothing yet known about any medium or long-term side effects.
The child clinical trials will continue to be monitored for long term protection and safety two years after vaccination. If serious, long-term health impacts emerge, it will be too late for those who are vaccinated now, who will have to live with the consequences. Already there seems to be a signal in the data from Israel revealing myocarditis (inflammation of the heart muscle) described by the Israeli health authority as 1 in 44,000 16-30 year-olds, but with higher incidence in the youngest groups. This is not responsible medicine and is a reckless approach to children‘s health.
Excellent comprehensive article …
..”…We had no knowledge this was a possibility, which makes me even angrier this has happened to my child…”….These are the words of a mother whose young teenage daughter was diagnosed with Myocarditis after she suffered severe chest pains after her second Pfizer shot in the US. She was lucky, many other young people have died. But she may have heart issues now it’s not known. So much is not known about this novel new gene editing injection.
“We had no knowledge this was a possibility.” I have read these words often as I scroll through social media comments and threads, where personal experiences of those whose health has now been seriously affected are shared ….”We had no knowledge this was a possibility..”. or …’we tried to warn her not to get it but she didn’t want to lose her job…”..is another. …One such social media group is a Kiwi group that won’t be named to protect their privacy so that they won’t be censored silent, and isn’t that a disturbing thing to have to say.
The administrators plaintive cry tells the most disturbing story of what is happening here in our own back yard, but not officially of course. In their own words.
” …In the 4 months since I established the group I have received many heart breaking messages from New Zealanders whose lives will never be the same.
The nurse in her 30s who is still hospitalised with a post jab stroke, almost 2 months later.
The 22 year old who is currently learning how to swallow, walk and sit up again, after hers.
The 16 year old who, as I write this, is in a critical condition in Intensive Care.
The husband who cares for his sick wife, but who is now himself paralysed following his jab.
the man who has been in and out of ICU following the “explosion” of his pancreas post jab.
And the many reports I have received of frail elderly in our rest homes, passing in the day or two post jab. All of them explained as death from natural causes….I could literally fill pages with the stories I am holding…..Some days my heart breaks…”….
Lest we forget, all of this is happening unofficially.
The question begs to be asked; why didn’t she know?
More weird anomalies …
“The South Africa variant of the coronavirus might evade the Pfizer vaccine, according to a new study from Tel Aviv University and Israel’s largest healthcare provider.
The study, which was published Saturday and still requires peer review, looked at 400 individuals who tested positive for the coronavirus despite receiving at least one dose of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and compared the prevalence of the South African variant, B.1.351, with the same number of people who have not yet received a vaccination.
“We found a disproportionately higher rate of the South African variant among people vaccinated with a second dose, compared to the unvaccinated group,” said Adi Stern of Tel Aviv University. “This means that the South African variant is able, to some extent, to break through the vaccine’s protection.”
A Glorified Drug Cartel Whose Dealers Wore Lab Coats, Suits and Ties
An official tally of suspected side effects resulting from Covid vaccination in Sweden has surpassed 30,000, with the majority of cases occurring in people inoculated with AstraZeneca’s shot.
According to the Swedish Medical Products Agency, as of last week, the Scandinavian nation had received 31,844 reports of adverse reactions linked to the rollout of Covid-19 vaccines. Sweden is currently offering three variants of the drug. There are currently 2,103 reports of side effects from the Moderna shot, while the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine has been associated with 9,117 health issues. But the number of suspected adverse reactions from the two shots seems relatively small when compared to the 19,961 reports linked to AstraZeneca’s Vaxzevria.
The most common side effects for all three drugs were fever and headache. Other reported adverse reactions included nausea, joint pain, and dizziness.
From the brilliant retired Microbiologist Dr Sucharit Bhakdi. Note the first article is translated into English. The ‘related’ article below reads in English & has an accompanying video interview with Dr Bhakdi. (EWR comment)
IS THE mRNA VACCINE DANGEROUS?
It is being said everywhere that the mRNA vaccine is not dangerous. The reason is that only the information for a small part of the virus, the so-called “spike protein”, is introduced into our body and nothing else is simulated than what nature would also do. When our cells are attacked, the viruses also release their genetic material, so that our cells become “virus factories”. So basically everything shouldn’t be a problem? But! A respiratory infection takes place in the airways. If, in the worst case, cell death occurs, the damage can be repaired relatively easily through tissue renewal.When vaccinated, however, the virus information is injected into the muscle. Many believe that the packaged virus genes remain at the injection site – i.e. in the muscles. The genes would be taken up by cells on site, which is where most of the “virus factories” would be built. Side effects such as swelling, redness and pain at the puncture site would therefore be expected, but they were relatively harmless and went away after a few days. A fatal mistake!The virus genes from the manufacturers Moderna and Biontech / Pfizer are packaged in “lipid nanoparticles” – these are tiny packages, not made of paper, but of fatty substances. This will protect the content and make it easier for our body’s cells to absorb. The packaging itself means that the risk of severe allergic reactions is many times higher than with conventional vaccines (21) .It is not for nothing that warnings are now being given that people with allergies should not be vaccinated – life-threatening reactions (anaphylaxis) could be triggered. Indeed, in some vaccine volunteers, such dangerous side effects have required emergency treatment. In addition, nanoparticles can have numerous other harmful effects because they can impair the function of our blood cells and the coagulation system (22).
But it gets infinitely worse: Basic knowledge in medicine includes the fact that all soluble substances that are injected into a muscle get into the bloodstream and are distributed throughout the body in a very short time. It is precisely for this reason that substances that should work immediately are injected into the muscles. It is known that the sprayed gene packages also get into the blood (23). Which cell types will they take in, how will they process them and how will they produce the virus protein? The answer is: Nothing is known for sure. We are now witnessing large-scale tests on humans. That is absolutely irresponsible, especially since there was reason for caution right from the start. The possible dangers of the “packaging” were known.More importantly, alarming antibody-dependent enhancement effects have been observed in research into SARS and other coronaviruses in animals (24, 25). In the decades of unsuccessful efforts to develop a vaccine against SARS and MERS, these intensifying effects were among the numerous problems (26). Against this background, shouldn’t animal experiments have had to be carried out in order to clearly exclude them for SARS-CoV-2? The fact is that scientific publications on the subject do not exist. Doctors who fail to make vaccinees aware of the risk that the vaccination could lead to worse disease progression violated their duty to provide information (27). And more seriously: Could the inoculation of virus genes trigger other, novel immune-related amplification effects? Shouldn’t very elementary things have to be considered and checked beforehand? As a reminder (see also the online chapter “Immunity”): Lymphocytes have a long-term memory – they remember what corona junk looks like. And corona trash looks pretty similar, no matter which family member it comes from. All people have completed training rounds with coronaviruses and have lymphocytes that recognize SARS-CoV-2 garbage. Some might reply that these cross-reactive killer lymphocytes were only detected in 40 to 70 percent of the old blood samples and that they only reacted weakly to SARS-CoV-2 (28, 29). However, it is known that there is always only a small proportion of all lymphocytes in the blood. The others are just taking a break and are resting in the lymphatic organs (including the lymph nodes).
Exciting: In April 2020, Swedish researchers reported that they had discovered something remarkable. Regardless of the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 disease, all people (100 percent) had troubled, agitated T lymphocytes in the blood (30). This finding is a wink from the fence post. Because when the immune system encounters a virus for the first time, the lymphocyte response is sluggish. Fast, strong reactions reveal that troops that have been warned are already at their feet and can be mobilized at any time. They then swarm out of the lymphatic organs to fight the enemy.
Your main task: wiping out the virus factories Death of your own cells that produce the viruses. And now back to the new reality, the large-scale test on people. The injected gene packets are taken up locally in muscle cells, but a large part of it ends up in the local lymph nodes and the bloodstream. The entire immune team sits in the lymph nodes. This cell will then produce the virus protein and display the garbage it generates on its surface. This cell will then display the virus protein on its surface. The corona-specialized killer lymphocyte next door jumps up – it has discovered a virus factory and will destroy it. The fratricidal battle begins, immune cell against immune cell! Lymph node swelling could be a sign of this reaction. Plus pain. The lymphocytes stimulate each other and then pour out of the lymph nodes to track down other enemies.You find these in the muscle cells that put the corona garbage in front of the door and go into attack mode. Redness, swelling and pain develop at the injection site. But now the nightmare begins. The smallest substances such as sugar can seep out of the blood into the tissue, whereas large molecules such as proteins cannot. The vessel walls are tight for them thanks to the lining with a layer of cells – the endothelial cells. How are the gene packages made – big or small?
Correct: relatively very large. So once they get into the blood, like the blood cells, they will remain in the closed network of vascular tubes. A small part of them are taken up by white blood cells. Presumably, however, most of the virus factories will be built in the endothelial cells. This would mainly happen where the blood flows slowly – in the small and smallest vessels – because the gene packets can be taken up by the cells particularly efficiently there (31). The cells then place the waste in front of the door – to the vessel lumen (to the vessel opening). The killer lymphocytes are on patrol there. This time the fight is one-sided. The endothelial cells have no defense against the attack by the killer cells.One can only guess what happens then. The destruction of endothelial cells and the associated damage to the vascular lining usually lead to blood clotting and the formation of clots. This would happen in innumerable vessels in innumerable places in the body. If it happens in the placenta, severe damage to the child in the womb could result. If it happens in other organs, including the heart, brain and spinal cord, all conceivable consequences are possible.Is there any evidence that something like this is happening? Yes, we are talking about rare blood diseases for which a possible connection to vaccination would have to be examined (32). Reports from patients in whom a sharp drop in blood platelets (thrombocytes) has been observed are conspicuous. That would fit the hypothesis set out here, because platelets are activated and consumed at the locations where the clot is formed.It would be easy to check whether the assumption is correct. Laboratory results immediately provide information about whether the blood has started to clot. Autopsies could clarify whether clots have formed in the small vessels. And in the meantime, consideration might be given to using anticoagulants in patients as a preventative measure. The administration of cortisone preparations to dampen lymphocyte activity could also be worth considering.The fact is that vaccination-related deaths are ongoing worldwide. Officially it is said that of course the vaccination has nothing to do with the deaths.Almost all of them are elderly people with numerous previous illnesses who would have died soon anyway. If that should actually be the case, no thinking and compassionate person will understand why they then had to be vaccinated – with a hardly characterized vaccine.In a frail person, what could lead to death hours and days after vaccination? Several possibilities are conceivable:Stress from the vaccination itself. Allergic reactions.Autoimmune attack. Lymphocytes can also be used in old age. For older people with previous illnesses, the attack on the virus factories could be the last drop that brings the barrel to overflowing.It gets a little more complicated when a real infection comes into play. Several nursing homes apparently had Covid-19 outbreaks just in the days after residents were vaccinated. It can be described as noticeable that up to this point in time there had hardly been any cases in the entire area and that all hygiene measures had been observed. Even after the second vaccination, there were outbreaks (33,34), a clear and expected indication that the vaccination does not protect against infection.It also seems as if the vaccinated are dying. Is this perhaps the immune-related disease exacerbation we have to fear? Now not caused by antibodies, but by applied killer lymphocytes? And couldn’t that happen to everyone vaccinated at any time – tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, next week, next autumn? Because lymphocytes have an elephant memory. And they recognize something that looks similar to all coronaviruses: garbage. That is, the lymphocyte-related exacerbation of the course of the disease could probably occur with any infection with a related virus. For every “successfully” vaccinated person – whether young or old – and at any time in the near or distant future.
RELATED: WARNING: Renowned Virologist Sucharit Bhakdi Warns Against Hastily Created Gene-Altering Coronavirus Vaccine (video) (LINK BELOW)
Photo: RAIR Fndn video screenshot
This vaccine has not been approved or licensed, and is still under investigation.1
Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine:
Short-Term Efficacy & Safety Data
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2) is made from synthetic genetic material that is immersed in fatty substances, including cholesterol and polyethylene glycol (PEG). More specifically, modified RNA molecules that encode for a mutated spike (S) protein antigen of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, the virus that can cause COVID-19, are immersed in lipid nanoparticles. The drug is administered in two intramuscular 30 mcg doses, 21 days apart.1
The Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine has obtained emergency use authorization (EUA) from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and is currently investigational.1 The vaccine was studied through nonclinical data from rats and nonhuman primates, and clinical data from humans. The EUA was based on a human clinical trial comparing approximately 22,000 subjects who received the vaccine with 22,000 subjects who did not receive the vaccine (Table 1).2 The trial included a median observation period of two months; 50.6% of subjects were followed up for about two months after the second dose.2 The FDA states that due to the length of the clinical trial’s observation period, “it is not possible to assess sustained efficacy over a period longer than 2 months.”3
Since only two hospitalized cases of COVID-19 were observed, the clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitalizations from COVID-19.3 See Table 1. The FDA states, “A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.”3
Vaccine effectiveness was calculated by observing the vaccination status of 178 COVID-19 cases, where a COVID-19 case was defined as the presence of at least one COVID-19 symptom and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test at least seven days after the second dose. In subjects 18 to 64 years old, the vaccine was 89%–98% effective over a two-month observation period.3,4 However, since there were only 15 COVID-19 cases observed in subjects 65 to 74 years old and only five cases in subjects 75 years or older, the clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to accurately measure the vaccine’s effectiveness in those age groups.4 The vaccine may be only 53% effective in subjects 65 to 74 years old and 0% effective in subjects 75 years or older.4 See Table 1. Subjects 65 years or older comprise about 80% of all COVID-19 deaths, and subjects 75 years or older comprise about 60% of all COVID-19 deaths.5
Safety and efficacy data was either not tested or insufficient in children younger than 16 years old. In addition, since there was only one case of COVID-19 in subjects 16 to 17 years old, the study did not have enough statistical power to measure effectiveness in that age group.4 See Table 1.
The Pfizer clinical trial was not designed to observe asymptomatic infection with SARS-CoV-2 or the effect of the vaccine on the spread (transmission) of COVID-19. Consequently, the FDA states that “it is possible that asymptomatic infections may not be prevented as effectively as symptomatic infections” and “data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from individuals who are infected despite vaccination.” Furthermore, “additional evaluations including data from clinical trials and from vaccine use post-authorization will be needed to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing virus shedding and transmission, in particular in individuals with asymptomatic infection.”3 Approximately 40% of SARS-CoV-2 infections are asymptomatic.6
The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events during the two-month observation period to be 1.1%, or 1 in 91, in the vaccinated group and 0.6% in the unvaccinated group, resulting in a vaccine risk of 0.5% or 1 in 200 vaccinated subjects.2 Consequently, subjects who received the vaccine had nearly double the risk of a severe adverse event occurring in the two-month observation period compared to subjects who did not receive the vaccine. See Table 1. A severe adverse event was defined as one that “interferes significantly with participant’s usual function.”7
Of note, approximately 3,400 or 8% of all subjects experienced “suspected COVID-19” because they had symptoms but were not confirmed by testing for SARS-CoV-2; two of these cases required hospitalization, both of which were in the vaccinated group. These cases could represent other influenza-like illness and adverse events; 409 such cases occurred in the vaccinated group within seven days of injection whereas 287 such cases occurred in the unvaccinated group in the same time period. Only the cases that were reported as serious were recorded as adverse events.3 In the clinical trial, only 5% of all illnesses suspected of being COVID-19 were actually found to be COVID-19.
After emergency use authorization for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was obtained and mass vaccination began, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recorded about 5,000 “health impact events” among 215,000 vaccinated subjects (1 in 43) that, similar to the definition of severe adverse events in the clinical trial, prevented the ability to perform normal daily activities, including work, and required medical attention.8
Additionally, as there were only 11,600 subjects 16 to 55 years of age who received the vaccine,3 and since as of Feb. 2, 2021, about 1 in 31,000 people 15 to 34 years of age contracted a fatal case of COVID-19 in the U.S.,5 the clinical trial does not have sufficient data to determine safety in subjects who are 15 to 34 years of age. Per the FDA, “There are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine in subpopulations such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals.”3 And, because all subjects were observed for only two months, the long-term safety of the vaccine for any age group is not known.
The extent to which the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine is effective and safer than COVID-19 is not known. The clinical trial indicates that in subjects 65 to 74 years old, the vaccine may be only 53% effective, and in subjects 75 years or older, the age group that comprises about 60% of all COVID-19 deaths, the vaccine may be 0% effective; also, in children age 16 to 17 the vaccine may not be effective. The clinical trial did not have enough statistical power to measure the vaccine’s ability to prevent hospitalizations and deaths, and the trial did not assess if the vaccine prevents asymptomatic infection or spread (transmission) of the virus.
Severe adverse events in the vaccine group occurred in 1 in 91 subjects in the Pfizer clinical trial. The CDC has recorded that 1 in 43 vaccinated subjects was unable to perform normal daily activities and required medical attention. Furthermore, for people 15 to 34 years of age, the clinical trial did not include enough subjects to be able to show that the vaccine is safer than the disease, and because the clinical trial observation period lasted only two months, the incidence of long-term side effects from the vaccine for any age group is not known.
1. Hinton, Denise M. (U.S . Food and Drug Administration). Letter to: Elisa Harkins (Pfizer Inc.). 2020 Dec 23. https://www.fda.gov/media/144412/download. 2. Pfizer. Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162, PF-07302048): Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee briefing document. Meeting date: 10 December 2020. 2020 Nov 30: 38,46. https://www.fda.gov/media/144246/download. 3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting: December 10, 2020:14,16,17,20,24, 30,31,40,46,48. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download. 4. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee. FDA briefing document: Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting: December 10, 2020. Table 8: subgroup analyses of second primary endpoint: first COVID-19 occurrence from 7 days after dose 2, by subgroup, participants with and without evidence of infection prior to 7 days after dose 2, evaluable efficacy (7 days) population; 26. https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download. 5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Weekly updates by select demographic and geographic characteristics: provisional death counts for coronavirus disease (COVID-19); [cited 2021 Feb 2]. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vsrr/covid_weekly/index.htm#AgeAndSex. 6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. COVID-19 pandemic planning scenarios; [updated 2020 Sep 10; cited 2021 Jan 13]. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/planning-scenarios.html. 7.Pfizer. A phase 1/2/3 study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and efficacy of RNA vaccine candidates against COVID-19 in healthy individuals. https://cdn.pfizer.com/pfizercom/2020-11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020.pdf. 8. Clark T. Anaphylaxis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccine receipt. COVID-19 Vaccines Work Group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2020 Dec 19; [cited 2021 Mar 16]. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-Clark-508.pdf.
These statements are intended for informational purposes only and should not be construed as personal medical advice.
© 2021 Physicians for Informed Consent, an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit educational organization. All rights reserved. Apr 2021.
From Tribe of Kiwis YT channel
Voices For Freedom article (2 Apr 2021) “Who Cares If It’s Not The Law?” – with a preview of many of the source materials as the reading progresses. All SOURCES and LINKS are in the Show Notes below (click on “SHOW MORE”)
0:51 The Letter
2:04 1. The Approval Process
3:47 2. Marketing the Pfizer Vaccine
8:28 3. Administration of Pfizer Vaccine
9:45 Informed Consent
11:15 Remedies Sought
12:27 So Who Does Care?
15:56 What’s next?
All SOURCES: More Information and Credits: See the SHOW NOTES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N… COPYRIGHT CREDITS (in video order) and thanks to: SOURCE TEXT for reading: Voices For Freedom (2 Apr 2021) “Who cares if it’s not the law? Why holding our government officials to account matters.” https://voicesforfreedom.co.nz/who-ca… The source article is responding to Sue Grey’s letter of 31 Mar 2021, published here: https://www.outdoorsparty.co.nz/sue-g… See further related materials in the SHOW NOTES – link above. “FAIR USE” VIDEO & SOUND clips These are used for the purposes of education, discussion and commentary: – NZ PM, VIDEO: speaking to a Press Conference (published 15 May 2020) https://youtu.be/ENEUktOrQV8 Jacinda Ardern – “We will continue to be your single source of truth. Otherwise, dismiss anything else.” – NZ PM VIDEO: Jacinda Ardern speaking to a Press Conference (published 1 Mar 2021) https://youtu.be/nqEVtGrluaA Talks about using “sustained propaganda”. LICENCED CLIPS: “Sunrise” video – Bellergy (Pixabay licence) In Intro & Outro: “The Last Days” Lyrics, music and performance © S Stevenson (with permission) A PETITION to the NZ PARLIAMENT was earlier promoted on this channel on the topic of “Informed Consent” re the vaccine. https://youtu.be/O–hz53ACVo Petition request: (300 character max) “That the House of Representatives urge the Government to ensure that the use of any coronavirus vaccine is voluntary in New Zealand and that no coercion will be applied to NZers from Government or private entities to take it.” The petition ran until 5 Nov 2020 and received 5,000+ signatures. A detailed SUPPORTING DOCUMENT was provided to the petition site, but could not be linked to the petition as no space is provided for evidential support on the government website. You can access (and download) that document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14… Ep 4 of the Tribe of Kiwis series “Is the NZ Government Manufacturing Consent?” was also on the topic of Informed Consent in NZ, focusing on the Nuremberg Code and the official Guidelines for the Public Service Commission. See here: https://youtu.be/S9ai4NasMPE SUBSCRIBE for an alert for the next episode in the series. Tribe of Kiwis is a place for conversation about things that matter to ordinary Kiwis – people who want to consider and share information important to our shared future …… and that of our children and grandchildren. Email: email@example.com
Ep 4 discusses “Informed Consent” and the Covid-19 vaccine. Sources and links in the Show Notes below (click on “SHOW MORE”)
0:16 Is the govt ‘Manufacturing Consent’?
0:43 Voluntary Informed Consent is mandatory
0:58 Chris Hipkins on vax not “compulsory”
1:51 Pfizer / mRNA vax in NZ
2:55 Ideas of Consent
3:08 The Nuremberg Code
4:41 Fifty years after Nuremberg
4:51 International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights
4:54 Public Service Vax Workforce Guide
7:51 America’s Frontline Doctors on Nuremberg Code
9:12 Critique of Public Service Guide
9:53 Resist vax-status apartheid
All SOURCES , More Information and Credits: See the SHOW NOTES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N…
COPYRIGHT CREDITS (in video order) and thanks to:
“FAIR USE” VIDEO & SOUND clips These are used for the purposes of education, discussion and commentary:
(3 Sept 2020) “Coronavirus: Health Minister Chris Hipkins quashes rumours Covid-19 vaccine will be compulsory” [Stuff] https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/heal…
(9 Apr 2020) CNBC “Bill Gates explains the work his foundation is doing to combat coronavirus” [YouTube from 3:27] https://youtu.be/EjgbMib36do
(3 Apr 2021) World Doctor’s Alliance “Vaccine Passports are a coercive tool to force social compliance – Americas Frontline Doctors” [BrandNewTube] https://brandnewtube.com/watch/vaccin…
(16 Aug 2018) “What are the ages of sexual consent around the world? ” [SBS] https://www.sbs.com.au/language/engli…
“Defendants seated under guard in the dock behind the defense counsel during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947”.[ushmm] https://www.ushmm.org/information/exh…
“Brigadier General Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.” [ushmm] https://www.ushmm.org/information/exh…
(undated) “G E Free Zone” [Source unknown – social media meme]
LICENCED CLIPS: “Sunrise” video – Bellergy (Pixabay licence) In Intro & Outro: “The Last Days” Lyrics, music and performance © S Stevenson (with permission) A PETITION to the NZ PARLIAMENT was earlier promoted on this channel on the topic of “Informed Consent” re the vaccine. https://youtu.be/O–hz53ACVo Petition request: (300 character max) “That the House of Representatives urge the Government to ensure that the use of any coronavirus vaccine is voluntary in New Zealand and that no coercion will be applied to NZers from Government or private entities to take it.” The petition ran until 5 Nov 2020 and received 5,000+ signatures. A detailed supporting document was provided to the petition site, but could not be linked to the petition as no space is provided for evidential support on the government website. You can access (and download) that document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14… SUBSCRIBE for an alert for the next episode in the series. Tribe of Kiwis is a place for conversation about things that matter to ordinary Kiwis – people who want to consider and share information important to our shared future …… and that of our children and grandchildren. Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
About twelve hours ago I passed a sort of personal milestone: I found, and read, an ecstatic Facebook post from the twentieth person I know who has received a dose of one of those experimental drugs the U.S. government, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars of our money, is trying to persuade us to turn loose on our immune systems.
Below is a link to the Pfizer Safety Data sheet, sent to me by a reader. A fascinating document to say the least. There are three statements that feature prolifically:
“no information available”
and “not listed” …
There are also warnings for those handling the vaccine such as:
“Ingredient(s) indicated as hazardous have been assessed under standards for workplace safety. In accordance with 29 CFR 1910.1200, the exact percentage composition of this mixture has been withheld as
a trade secret.” (p 3)
“Wear safety glasses as minimum protection (goggles recommended).” (p 6)
“Wear impervious disposable gloves (e.g. Nitrile, etc.) as minimum protection (double recommended).” (p 6)
“Wear impervious disposable protective clothing when handling this compound. Full body protection is recommended” (p 6)
“Environmental properties have not been investigated. Releases to the environment should be avoided” (p 9)
“No safety data for oral, dermal or inhalation exposure of any ingredient”
“Most important symptoms and effects (of accidental exposure) – No data”
“Fine particles or mists (of the contents of the vaccine vial) may fuel explosions and fires “
“All handling of the vaccine or responders to a breakage or spillage must wear PPE “
“Release to the environment must be avoided…use of dust collectors and HEPA filters recommended “
“Endocrine Disrupting Properties” – no information (endocrine is the human hormonal system)”
“The best available technology should be used to prevent environmental release”
“Preventing environmental release may including destructive techniques for waste and wastewater“
The above are warnings to those handling the injection vials … so it becomes “safe and effective” presumably, once it’s actually injected into a human!
Go to the link below and follow the “agree” process to move through to the Safety data sheet. The product is called Comirnaty: https://safetydatasheets.pfizer.com/
Or download the document here:
NOTE: The so-called vaccine has only been approved for provisional use in NZ and Australia, provisional because “people will die otherwise.”
FINALLY in conclusion, from Pfizer (p12):
“Pfizer Inc believes that the information contained in this Safety Data Sheet is accurate, and while it is provided in good faith, it is without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied. If data for a hazard are not included in this document there is no known information at this time.“
Good luck people. Please do your own due diligence!
In very brief summary, this NZ woman reporting her experience following the covid-19 injection, did not feel fully informed, felt coerced with respect to retaining her employment, was not fully supported by NZ’s medical establishment after the injury, the medical center did not report her adverse reaction and says she was treated with hostility by one of the ambulance staff about any implied link. She is recovering but has decided not to take the second shot. Read the article and listen to her interview with Peter Williams on Magic Talk Radio. EWR
Over the past month, NZ has witnessed the rollout of the new, experimental COVID-19 Comirnaty vaccine from Pfizer to border workers, frontline staff and their families.
The government and media report that there has been high uptake from within this industry and there has been no mention of ANY adverse reactions in the news. But this is not what we are hearing behind the scenes from people within the industry.
We have spoken with border workers up and down the nation and they report that many of their colleagues have made the choice to delay or decline this vaccine. In some regions, that number is close to 50%.
We have also heard about vaccine injury.
Jane* has recounted to us the distressing story of her experience with workplace coercion and of suffering an adverse reaction to the vaccine she was administered back at the beginning of March.
Here is her story…
Jane is a healthy young mother of three children. She is the breadwinner for her family and whilst she didn’t actually want to take the COVID-19 vaccine, she was left with little choice – to take the vaccine and keep her job, or decline and be unable to continue in her role within the organisation. Voices for Freedom have confirmed that this same messaging has also been communicated to border workers (in the same role) in another part of the country.
She described the speed with which the rollout took place within her workplace and how she felt ill-informed and rushed into a decision prior to the administration of her vaccine…”
(Note: voicesforfreedom invite you to send in any experience you may have had following the injection … see details at the link).
The U.K. Government have released the sixth update highlighting adverse reactions to the Pfizer / BioNTech MRNA vaccine and the Oxford / AstraZeneca Viral Vectored vaccine, which have both been authorised for emergency use only in the United Kingdom, and the rate of adverse reactions has increased… again.
From C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand (@ Facebook)
What does Pfizer itself say about their vaccine safety?
From a Question and Answer page on Pfizer’s own website Jan 6 2021: Q: “How long will you be watching people who have been vaccinated? How do we know that bad side effects can’t happen long after vaccination, if the vaccine’s only been studied for less than a year?”
A: “We will track participants in our phase 3 clinical trial for the next two years following their second dose, in order to document the long-term effectiveness and safety of the vaccine. [xiii] Our trial is closely monitored by Pfizer and an outside, independent group of experts called a Data Monitoring Committee, or DMC. Trial investigators also monitor participants’ health, and participants in the trial attend regular planned follow-up visits as part of the trial. Pfizer and BioNTech will be conducting additional studies to determine how effective and safe the vaccine is in the real world and among specific risk groups such as healthcare workers and among nursing home residents. “
Hmmmm….so while our health professionals and Government repeat the “safe and effective” mantra endlessly…Pfizer’s own website acknowledges the long term safety data and proof of efficacy does not yet exist. Guess that makes you and me “test subjects” in a yet to be completed trial? https://www.pfizer.com/…/the_facts_about_pfizer_and…
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The UK Government’s reporting system for COVID vaccine adverse reactions from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency released their latest report today, March 4, 2021.
The report covers data collected from December 9, 2020, through February 21, 2021, for the two experimental COVID vaccines currently in use in the U.K. from Pfizer and AstraZeneca.
They report a total of 460 deaths and 243,612 injuries.
For the COVID-19 mRNA Pfizer- BioNTech vaccine analysis they report:
Some highlights if we could call them that! So much happening & catching up here with just a sprinkling of latest developments. Stay safe and informed. Research! EWR
From Children’s Health Defense:
From Health Impact News
From Dr Mercola
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
The CDC has done another data dump today into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.
CANBERRA — Australia administered its first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA shot on Sunday. But you may not have heard about it if you rely on Facebook for news.
The drama began last Thursday when Facebook blocked all Australian news platforms and links on its website. The move was Facebook’s response to Australia’s News Media Bargaining Code. The new law would require Facebook and Google to pay Australian publishers for disseminating their work on the platforms. The aim is to level the playing field and chip away at Facebook and Google’s global information monopoly.
Note: Read this post about the first whistleblower. This forced jab was under the supervision if you like, of two soldiers in camo uniform! The early vaccination of the elderly was about health & caring yet they are dying like flies as one brave man has reported. EWR
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Earlier this week we published the English translation of a video in German that Attorney Reiner Fuellmich published with a whistleblower who works in a nursing home where several residents were injected with the experimental COVID mRNA shots against their will, and where many of them died a short time later. See:
Since that interview was published, other whistleblowers in Germany who work in nursing homes have also stepped forward, some with video footage showing residents being held down and vaccinated against their wish.
In an amended reply to the FDA’s rejection of his concerns about Pfizer’s clinical trials, Dr. Sin Hang Lee says the FDA is glossing over potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy.
Pfizer’s announcement in November 2020 that clinical trials showed its COVID-19 vaccine was “95% effective” prompted Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a Connecticut pathologist, to question Pfizer’s methodology and petition the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require accurate counts of COVID-19 cases in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial before granting the vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EAU).
“Until an accurate count of COVID-19 cases in the vaccinated and placebo groups has been determined for vaccine efficacy evaluation, we are asking the FDA to stay its decision regarding the emergency use authorization for this vaccine.”
Here’s the sequence of events as they unfolded:
“VACCINE side effects: Many people are concerned with growing reports of people falling ill after a vaccine. Experts claim this is a predictable outcome and can actually be a good thing. What exactly happens to the body when vaccinated and why are scientists claiming it be a good thing?” says UK’s Express.
Whilst, numbers of reactions and deaths are …. “… through January 29, 2021 … 11,249 recorded adverse events, including 501 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna.”
Remember only a small percentage are even reported to VAERS.
Further I have been reading denials by the manufacturers of the vaccines that there is any connection to the deaths.
Below here is the UK Express’s article about the ‘normality’ of those disturbing reactions we’ve been seeing:
Here is also a link to but some of those emerging reactions:
Here is a comprehensive list of statements, some include videos, detailing various people’s experience following vaccination. This info I consider important as you make your own decision about taking the very new vaccine. I note it is new because vaccines normally take up to 10 years to develop, taking into account animal testing which has simply been by bypassed. So … it is being called by many health professionals, ‘experimental’. Finally, for an overview, I recommend you listen to a lecture given by Dr Simone Gold from America’s Frontline Doctors:
1. Original posts with individual links in comments**There are many many more stories out there.
THE CONDITION OF A TEENAGER AFTER THE COVID-19 VACCINATION
Another person’s anaphylactic adverse effect https://www.facebook.com/1343385993/posts/10225698375549833/?d=n
Another adverse effect, uncontrollable tremors again https://www.facebook.com/groups/312382486840127/permalink/323010912443951/
Another adverse effect, uncontrollable tremors in young woman. The amount of these types of reactions is dumbfounding https://www.facebook.com/622403339/posts/10158875926268340/?d=n
Another one, uncontrollable tremors adverse effect, so sad https://www.facebook.com/100000515961692/posts/4369823249711497/?d=n
Another person’s adverse effect to Pfizer. Feet turned purple, no circulation
Pfizer, stroke adverse effect
Another adverse effect, the tremors and convulsions in second video are extremely awful
Another Adverse effect, the video of the woman’s tremors are heartbreaking Video has been censored.
And another one tremors and uncontrollable shaking of the entire body
Many reactions like these I have seen
2. FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated in ONE DAY are “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work” after vaccination. This is a massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work after having the Pfizer vaccine.
https://www.zerohedge.com/…/philadelphia-priest-dies… now error 404
replacement here: https://www.thevoid.uk/void-post/philadelphia-priest-dies-after-participating-in-moderna-covid-vaccine-trial-zero-hedge/
3. THE PFIZER VACCINE. FROM THE CDC; 3,150 people vaccinated in ONE DAY are “unable to perform normal daily activities, unable to work” after vaccination. This is a massive 2.7% of people who can no longer work after having the Pfizer vaccine.
Portuguese health worker, 41, dies two days after getting the Pfizer covid vaccine as her father says he ‘wants answers’
Mexican doctor hospitalized after receiving COVID-19 vaccine
Hundreds of Israelis get infected with Covid-19 after receiving Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.
Wife of ‘perfectly healthy’ Miami doctor, 56, who died of a blood disorder 16 days after getting Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is certain it was triggered by the jab, as drug giant investigates first death with a suspected link to shot.
75-year-old Israeli man dies 2 hours after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
Death of Swiss man after Pfizer vaccine.
88-year-old collapses and dies several hours after being vaccinated.
Thousands negatively affected after getting Covid-19 vaccine.
Hospital worker with no prior allergies in intensive care with severe reaction after Pfizer Covid vaccine.
4 volunteers develop FACIAL PARALYSIS after taking Pfizer Covid-19 jab, prompting FDA to recommend ‘surveillance for cases’.
Investigation launched as 2 people die in Norway nursing home days after receiving Pfizer’s Covid-19 vaccine.
Hundreds Sent to Emergency Room After Getting COVID-19 Vaccines
U.S. officials report more severe allergic reactions to COVID-19 vaccines.
NHS told not to give Covid vaccine to those with history of allergic reactions.
COVID-19: Single vaccine dose leads to ‘greater risk’ from new coronavirus variants, South African experts warn
CDC reveals at least 21 Americans have suffered life threatening allergic reactions to Pfizer’s COVID vaccine
Woman experiences side effects of COVID-19 vaccine
COVID Vaccine Side Effects More Common After 2nd Dose.
Bulgaria Reports 4 Cases Of Side Effects From Pfizer Covid Vaccine.
Two NHS workers suffer allergic reaction to Pfizer vaccine.
600+ adverse reactions in post and comments https://www.facebook.com/563626950/posts/10157522857616951/?d=n
Written by his wife: “The love of my life, my husband Gregory Michael MDan Obstetrician that had his office in Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami Beach Died the day before yesterday due to a strong reaction to the COVID vaccine.He was a very healthy 56 year old, loved by everyone in the community delivered hundreds of healthy babies and worked tireless through the pandemic.He was vaccinated with the Pfizer vaccine at MSMC on December 18, 3 days later he saw a strong set of petechiae on his feet and hands which made him seek attention at the emergency room at MSMC. The CBC that was done at his arrival showed his platelet count to be 0 (A normal platelet count ranges from 150,000 to 450,000 platelets per microliter of blood.) he was admitted in the ICU with a diagnosis of acute ITP caused by a reaction to the COVID vaccine. A team of expert doctors tried for 2 weeks to raise his platelet count to no avail. Experts from all over the country were involved in his care. No matter what they did, the platelets count refused to go up. He was conscious and energetic through the whole process but 2 days before a last resort surgery, he got a hemorrhagic stroke caused by the lack of platelets that took his life in a matter of minutes. He was a pro vaccine advocate that is why he got it himself. I believe that people should be aware that side effects can happened, that it is not good for everyone and in this case destroyed a beautiful life, a perfect family, and has affected so many people in the community. Do not let his death be in vain please save more lives by making this information news.”
I think it is important that people are aware that clinical trials of these “vaccines” doesn’t finish until 2023!! So everyone who is taking the “vaccine” which is being rolled out world wide is participating in the “vaccine clinical trials”. Pfizer jab won’t be complete till January 27th 2023!!!
The Moderna trials come to a close on December 2023 !!!
The AstraZeneca trials will reach completion in February 2023 !!!
Q. What are the risks of inoculating everyone with COVID-19 vaccines? The big risk with both Oxford and Pfizer vaccines is auto-immune response. Experts are warning of risks of stroke, paralysis, convulsions/seizures, anaphylaxis, encephalitis, birth defects and others.
VAERS report, vaccine injury leading to death https://www.facebook.com/8358…/posts/10160719444828858/…
Moderna themselves calls mRNA “the SOFTWARE of life”
From all the side effects already happening, some really extreme, including all of the below mentioned, many deaths occurring already and yet no liability for damages to affected people, it certainly has to raise a red flag
Potential adverse effects of nanoparticles on the reproductive system https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6294055/
(Note the source is showing ‘not available’ as the creator has possibly marked it private now).