This is not a new idea. Ardern has been saying for a good while now, since the plandemic in particular, that she and her government are oursingle source of truth.
She is serious about that. At one point she even told Kiwis not to speak to their neighbours. This all of course flies in the face of community and caring and looks not unlike fascism … parading under the guise of protecting our physical health. No problem however with the rise in numbers of child suicides. That has been sorted however by changing the definition of suicide to‘accidental death’. And no move towards investigating the rise in NZ’s all cause mortality rate or any possible correlation it may have with the jab rollout. Apart from a recent admission by NZ’s vaccine expert Helen Petousis Harris, that they perhaps didn’t warn us well enough of a possible Myocarditis risk. This also followed a coroner’s ruling that a New Zealander’s death one year ago was caused by the jab. That has been followed by a Bill in Parliament as I write, to tweak the requirements around coroners’ investigations as to ’cause of death’. They are overwhelmed it seems by the sheer numbers of deaths so appear to be attempting to fast track the process.
So Ardern, who is one of Schwab’s global leaders remember, speaks of a need to double down globally on censorship. The perceived need is to censor ‘disinformation’. Could that disinfo include uncomfortable truths like the plight of those who fell ill or died post jab? There were many of those there at the Parliament protest earlier in 2022, totally ignored … ‘kind’ Ardern declined to speak with any of them. Not one, and there were even Medical Doctors there speaking out. She did eventually show her face however, once the protest was disbanded.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is the latest liberal leader to call for an international alliance to censor speech. Unsatisfied with the unprecedented corporate censorship of social media companies, leaders like Hillary Clinton have turned from private censorship to good old-fashioned state censorship. Speech regulation has become an article of faith on the left. Ardern used her speech this week to the United Nations General Assembly to call for censorship on a global scale.
Ardern lashed out at “disinformation” and called for a global coalition to control speech. After nodding toward free speech, she proceeded to lay out a plan for its demise through government regulation:
But what if that lie, told repeatedly, and across many platforms, prompts, inspires, or motivates others to take up arms. To threaten the security of others. To turn a blind eye to atrocities, or worse, to become complicit in them. What then?
This is no longer a hypothetical. The weapons of war have changed, they are upon us and require the same level of action and activity that we put into the weapons of old.
We recognized the threats that the old weapons created. We came together as communities to minimize these threats. We created international rules, norms and expectations. We never saw that as a threat to our individual liberties – rather, it was a preservation of them. The same must apply now as we take on these new challenges.
Ardern noted how extremists use speech to spread lies without noting that non-extremists use the same free speech to counter such views. To answer her question on “how do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists” is that you convince people using the same free speech. Instead, Ardern appears to want to silence those who have doubts. While referring to a global censorship coalition as a “light-touch approach to disinformation,” Ardern revealed how sweeping such a system would likely be. She defended the need for such global censorship on having to combat those who question climate change and the need to stop “hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology.”
“After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble? How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists? How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld, when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?”
That is the same rationale used by authoritarian countries like China, Iran, and Russia to censor dissidents, minority groups, and political rivals. What is “hateful” and “dangerous” is a fluid concept that government have historically used to silence critics or dissenters. Ardern is the smiling face of the new generation of censors. At least the old generation of censors like the Iranians do not pretend to support free speech and openly admit that they are crushing dissent. The point is that we need to be equally on guard when censorship is pushed from the left with the best of motivations and the worst of means. As the great civil libertarian Justice Louis Brandeis once said, “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
Sean Plunket interviews Petousis Harris on the rollout of the injection including possible adverse events in terms of warning the public.
Q … “Do you think the new risk [of Myocarditis] was adequately conveyed to the public and to medical practitioners who were administering the vaccine?”
Reply … “No, I don’t”
This is really interesting because at the rollout of the injection, the FDA had already placed on their website a long list of possible side effects, very few of which were listed on the NZ Health site, indeed when posted to social media this FDA list was removed. See this article on topic
The second is uploaded at the Coronavirus Plushie video channel at bitchute.com who comment “This video was quickly deleted from the Platform’s You Tube channel, but its still on their Facebook here (above link provided).
In NZ, “people are at the heart of policy decisions” says PM Ardern. Meanwhile, many NZ parents are concerned that their ‘open and transparent’ government is reserving the (legal) right to detain their children at school for 72 hours in the event of a health emergency, disallowing all contact with their parents. This became apparent following recent alleged bomb threats.
LISTEN AT THE LINK TO HOW AGENDA 2030 IS ‘PROGRESSING’:
State takeover of private land accelerates – Statement by Groundswell NZ
Anyone that owns, leases, or manages property or land in New Zealand, both urban and rural, should be very concerned about the latest developments on the West Coast. That is the message from Groundswell NZ, after over 1500 West Coast property owners received letters in the mail, out of the blue, stating that their properties had been zoned for takeover by state control and that restrictions would take immediate legal effect. There was no consultation with affected property owners and no compensation for loss of use or drop in property value. Property owners have been left in a state of shock and angry at the lack of respect and fair process.
This takeover of private land came about after the four West Coast councils released a combined district plan last week, called Te Tai o Poutini. The zonings include sites of significance to Maori, historic areas, outstanding natural landscapes, and significant natural areas (SNAs). Both urban and rural residents are impacted.
In taking this draconian action, the councils have now turned anything that has cultural, historic, or natural value into a liability. Would you want any of these features on your property if it would make you vulnerable to losing the use of your land and the resulting drop in the value of your property?
This state takeover of private land is accelerating throughout New Zealand, as local councils are being forced by Government directive to enforce unworkable regulations. The raft of ill-conceived regulations coming out of Wellington is causing considerable stress and anxiety for the thousands of people caught up by the legislation. This is the main reason Groundswell NZ started campaigning.
Groundswell NZ are calling for the West Coast councils to immediately withdraw the Te Tai o Poutini plan and to support their communities in lobbying the Government for workable legislation that focuses on achieving positive environmental outcomes, while working with and respecting the rights of people and communities.
Further down is a copy of the letter received by West Coast land owners.
Note from EWR: Peter Williams touched on this topic on Magic Talk Radio (before he unexpectedly left his position there). He raised the logical questions folk are asking as the above statement indicates. However asking questions of government has swiftly become a big no-no. Only one source of truth allowed. See our previous articles on topic here with a link to the Northland mapping of SNAs for your perusal. For your own region go to your own council website. The second article cites protests in Northland where similar letters had been sent. Last I heard they council had backed up on it. Something to watch carefully and clearly kicking up has had results. Links to the articles below:
The second article also cites Barbara McKenzie’s excellent research on topic. It features at her site titled Sto Vouno.
A final note, land grabs by governments are not new. As most indigenous folk know. It has been a reality of their existence for a very long time. Here in NZ, century before last, indigenous who did not want to sell their lands were deemed ‘rebels’ (via a government Act) and their lands were confiscated. Thereby NZ Māori lost no less than 6 million acres. That was just via confiscations. Government employed other means also. Those histories are generally little known unfortunately. Hence when told about them folk commonly won’t believe them. A source of much division and angst. I personally have heard more than one first hand example.
Ironically (or should that be strategically?) the rationale for this robbery is Agenda 21/30 speak … ‘biodiversity’ and ‘areas of significance to Māori’. Not all of us are fooled by the hypocrisy we’ve seen for more than three decades now. The professions of sustainability on council websites are belied by the widespread pollution (& cover up) that is still going on. Since the inception of Agenda 21 our waterways are more polluted, homelessness up, poverty up, unemployment up, debt up, and on it goes. (See our Local Government Watch pages, main menu).
“Our work is secret, but the reason for our success isn’t. It’s our people. And we’re just like you. We’re ordinary people. But together, we’re doing extraordinary things to protect New Zealand and New Zealanders.
This new position is at the centre of our dynamic, exciting and fast moving operational function, directly supporting NZSIS security and intelligence missions.
The role: Your focus in this role is to plan and coordinate surveillance deployments, ensuring resources are used effectively to maximise the delivery of priority intelligence outcomes.
You’ll achieve this by representing the Surveillance Unit across the Intelligence Community and partners – initiating, enhancing and maintaining relationships to support our purpose to achieve successful and coordinated operational results.
You will lift our operational capability by contributing to surveillance training objectives as well as undertake research and development to support the delivery of new capabilities.
We’re looking for someone with:
Experience planning and/or coordinating operationally deployed teams within an intelligence, security, law enforcement, defence or similar environment
Operational planning knowledge and an understanding of operational risk assessments
Knowledge of the domestic security environment
Excellent relationship management skills and ability to collaborate and build strong partnerships
Sound judgement, critical thinking and initiative in dynamic situations
You may also need to be available to work flexible hours at short notice
We offer our people comprehensive benefits, flexible working and great work-life balance. Join us and let us help you become Beyond Ordinary.
Applications close on 28 June 2022.
To be eligible for employment within the NZIC you must have been a NZ citizen for at least 10 years. Alternatively you must hold a current NZ Residency Class Visa and ideally have been a citizen of UK, USA, Canada or Australia for at least 10 years.
You must be able to obtain and maintain a Top Secret Special (TSS) security clearance. Ordinarily to obtain this level of clearance candidates must have a 15 year checkable background in countries where meaningful and reliable checks can be undertaken. Where requisite checks are unable to be made, the candidate application may not be able to be progressed.
The NZIC treats all applications for employment in the strictest confidence and we ask that you maintain a similar level of confidentiality. You are expected to exercise discretion during the recruitment process and throughout your career.
Our Covid-19 vaccination policy requires all employees to be fully vaccinated. You will be required to provide evidence regarding your vaccinations status.”
“…families in Tokelau had been under house “isolation” [house arrest] for over seven months. Yet this issue was receiving little to no attention from local media.” All under the watch of Ross Ardern, Jacinda Ardern’s father, who has incidentally, just resigned. House arrest means no swimming, no phones, no working from home, no leaving home even. This is since July 2021, all for declining the NZ Govt’s ‘gift’ of the (untested) Pfizer jab. The option to work from home was removed after the second round of the ‘free jab’. Note well, this is a country that at the time of this travesty of justice, there was not a single case of covid to be seen. A must read, with three videos there to keep you up to speed. Please share this. EWR
In 1962, Samoa became the first Pacific Island Nation to move from being New Zealand administered to self-governing successfully. An entity with a Samoan administration, endorsed by the United Nations and made up entirely of qualified Samoans.
It is easy to get caught up in the moment. Samoans are so proud of our independent status among the nations of the World, and as a fellow Samoan, I can’t help but share in that same sense of pride and accomplishment. Today, in New Zealand, we commemorate this auspicious moment in Samoan history by celebrating an entire week of Samoan-themed activities known collectively as Samoan Language Week.
But what if Samoa never gained its Independence from New Zealand?
How would that change things in our relationship with New Zealand or with fellow Kiwis?
I do not know the answer to that question, but there is one Pacific island nation out there today that is still under the administration of the New Zealand government. And this nation is where a travesty of freedom has taken place. A mockery of liberty that, in my opinion, can only be traced back to the COVID–19 policies of the Jacinda Ardern-led Labour/Greens coalition government.
That Pacific island nation is Tokelau and knowing what is currently taking place there has put a significant damper on Samoan Language Week for me.
Who can celebrate Freedom and Independence when your Pacific neighbour cannot celebrate with you?
Tokelau and Samoa are more than just neighbours; they are family, aiga. Indeed, the only way to access Tokelau is by a 20-hour boat trip from Samoa.
As one of the Talanoa Sa’o program hosts, I am always on the lookout for Pacifica stories of interest to discuss. Hearing about Tokelauans being placed under House Arrest for refusing the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine immediately caught my attention.
New Zealand has for many decades waged a war against predators. Currently there are a number of anti-predator campaigns, often using public money in big spend-ups on futile aerial poisoning exercises. In addition, in the end, the blanket operations run counter to the impassioned aim of exterminating predators (e.g. rats) and instead cause major disruption to food chains and serious damage to the ecosystem. For example there is Predator Free 2050, and Zero Invasive Predators, the latter jazzily known by the acronym of ZIP. The zealous programmes have earned international recognition.“Time” magazine which proclaimed “Rats, Possums and Stoats Beware! New Zealand Goes to War Against Invasive Pests.” But the programmes are like the 1837 Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale “The Emperor’s New Clothes”. At one stage in the fable, the wise man serving the Emperor thinks “What!” “Is it possible that I am a fool? I have never thought so myself. No one must know it now if I am so. Can it be, that I am unfit for my job?”Those questions should be asked of those who champion Predator Free 2050 and ZIP – people from Prime Ministers to central and local government politicians, local bodies, naive unquestioning media whoop as investigative journalists, extreme green groups and even unprincipled “scientists” following the money trail of funding all pursuing the dream of exterminating New Zealand’s predators. However the reality is the dreams are running against the way Nature behaves.
Predator Role Wildlife mangers overseas are increasingly regarding predators as an important part of a healthy ecosystem. In 2014 Al S Glen of New Zealand’s Landcare Research and Christopher Dickman of Sydney University co-authored a book on “Carnivores of Australia” and in a chapter “The Importance of Predators” said “to maintain or restore functioning ecosystems, wildlife managers must consider the ecological importance of predators.” This is hardly a new idea. Charles Elton, an Oxford ecologist, first conceptualised food webs in the 1920s, speculating that wolf removal would result in over-population of deer on which wolves preyed. The notion was taken up by others such as highly respected conservationist and author Aldo Leopold. Predators tend to remove vulnerable prey, such as the old, injured, sick, or very young, leaving more food for the survival and success of healthy prey animals. Also, by controlling the size of prey populations, predators help slow down the spread of disease. Predators will catch healthy prey when they can, but catching sick or injured animals is more likely and helps in the formation of healthier prey populations because only the fittest animals survive and are able to reproduce. In addition, predators help to reduce the negative impacts that their prey may have on the ecosystem if they become too abundant or it they stayed in one area for too long. Biologists have recognised predators like cheetahs prey on grazing animals like antelope, it keeps the prey population moving around (in fear) and prevents overgrazing in any one area. As a result, more trees, shrubs, bushes, and grasses can grow, which then provides habitat for many other species.
Predator Removal Dangers If carnivores were removed from an ecosystem, what would happen? Herds of grazing animals, such as antelope, would grow and grow and result, in large herds overgrazing their food source, and as the food disappeared, the whole herd would begin to starve. Caroline Fraser writing for the US’s Yale School of the Environment said experts “beginning with aquatic experiments, have amassed considerable evidence of damage done to food chains by predator removal and have extended such studies to land.” Predators are simply a part of any ecosystem’s food chain. New Zealand’s native falcon prey on other native birds such as tuis and bellbirds. Blue duck (whio) prey almost entirely on aquatic invertebrates, mostly caddisfly larvae. Kiwi prey on worms. When animals of a predatory nature are introduced such as rats and stoats were to New Zealand, they go through a “boom and bust” phase before their populations settle down to a relatively static state. Unfortunately, native prey species can become drastically reduced or even extinct as a result of the predator “boom”. The critical aspect of managing this situation is avoiding predator “booms”. Consequently,the fervour and haste which the Department of Conservation and local councils applies with toxins is reckless and fraught with ecological danger.
Disastrous Outcomes Large scale poisoning with eco-toxins such as 1080 and brodifacoum may heavily reduce predator numbers initially but with a few short years, the outcome is disastrous. The science is there to show the resurgence in predator numbers and subsequent wrecking of the food chain. Wendy Ruscoe in a study published in Landcare Research’s publication 2008 showed aerial dropping of 1080 will temporarily knock back a rat population but due to the rodent’s amazing reproductive capacity, the surviving rats recover rapidly and within 18 months, are two to three times greater than before poisoning began. A 2007 study by Landcare scientists Graham Nugent and Peter Sweetapple showed rat numbers recovered within 18 months and at the two year mark, rat abundance could be four times greater than before poisoning.
Stoat Prey The disruption to the naive ecosystem ripples further. A major prey for stoats is rats. When rat numbers are reduced by 80% – 90%, the stoat deprived of its major food source, invariably switches prey to birds. But later as rat numbers surge and boom and pass original numbers, stoats enjoy a virtual banquet of rats, breeding increases and surges and then explodes.The well intentioned but ignorant predator extermination programme usually using 1080, has merely stimulated, within a few short years, major population explosions of rats and stoats. Attempting to poison-away rodent surges in beech-mast years is the ecological equivalent of farting against thunder. All this does (if anything) is delay the inevitable, as the fast-breeding ability of rodents will eventually allow population growth to match the food source. Rather than benefiting the birds and overall ecological health, there is massive ecological disruption by the man-induced mega rat and stoat plagues.
Ecological Damage That is not counting the birds and insects and other invertebrate organisms killed by 1080 as research demonstrated, by DSIR scientist Mike Meads, in the 1980’s. 1080 was originally patented as an insecticide in 1927. Examples are many of human interference directly or indirectly into Nature’s food chains resulting in profound consequences. In a classic 1966 experiment, biologist Robert Paine removed the purple seastar, Pisaster ochraceus — a voracious mussel-feeder — from an area of coastline in Washington state. Their predator gone, mussels exploded in numbers, crowding out biodiverse kelp communities with monoculture. Less than a decade after Pisaster, marine ecologists James Estes and John Palmisano reached the astonishing and widely reported conclusion that hunting of sea otters had caused the collapse of kelp forests around the Aleutian Islands. With otters reduced to low levels, the prey (sea urchins) stripped the kelp forests. When otters eventually returned, they regulated urchins, allowing “luxuriant” regrowth of biodiverse kelp communities.
Toheroa Decline In New Zealand, the decline of the toheroa shellfish was attributed unofficially to heavy over-fishing of snapper which preyed on paddle crabs which in turn preyed on toheroa. With the heavy decline in snapper, paddle crabs proliferated and almost obliterated toheroas. New Zealand has a long history of an obsession with attempted extermination of predators. In the 1950s acclimatisation societies managing trout fisheries blamed freshwater eels and shags for perceived declines in trout numbers. Bounties were paid out on eels. It had little effect. Ironically the best trout fishing rivers had healthy populations of both trout and eels. Eels simply removed the sick, the old or the unwary thus making for a quality trout population. The concept of being ”predator free” or “zero predators” has no ecological justification, except in limited circumstances on smaller offshore islands and “mainland islands”. Even in islands where predators may have been eliminated e.g. Secretary Island in Fiordland, the success is short-lived and temporary as animals can and do swim from the mainland to recolonise.
Playing God It seem incomprehensible that an agency such as the Department of Conservation and the Predator Free 2050 and ZIP concepts should go unquestioned in the light of the understanding internationally of the dangers of playing God with predators..But the ‘fly in the ointment’ is human nature. For example a scientist in DOC arguably has a vested interest by way of employment and a handsome salary. Similarly with any consulting scientist attached to Predator Free 2050 and ZIP. For others of zealous nature, as some humans are wont to be, it becomes the pursuit of “The Impossible Dream.” For politicians it’s good P.R. to declare war on the baddies, no matter how pointless and damaging that might be. The sad outcomes are the gross misuse of public funds and more tragically the profound ecological damage that often occurs in the pursuit of that “Impossible Dream.”
Tony Orman has spent a lifetime in the outdoors observing and reading about it and Nature. He has had some two dozen books published, mainly on fishing, deerstalking, conservation and rural life.
‘Silent No More’ is a story that every New Zealander must hear. This story is a tribute to the ‘Silent No More’ memorial service in front of parliament last week, it is a tribute to the Wellington Freedom Camp, and most importantly it is a tribute to the tens of thousands of Kiwis (probably a lot more) who have been so badly impacted by the COVID-19 vaccine.
‘Silent No More’ is a collective production of so many passionate Kiwis who just want the truth known. New Zealand needs to know the truth.
Is this the biggest scandal in New Zealand’s history?
This is a question that can only really be answered if the full truth and the full evidence is known and assessed by the people of New Zealand. Thankfully that may be beginning to happen now. But one thing is for certain. The biggest victims of this situation are now coming together, they are uniting to support each other, they are uniting to tell their stories, and they will be SILENT NO MORE.
An important point to note here. This is not an anti-vax story at all, and the information presented here is not anti-vax in any way. This is simply information and evidence about one particular vaccine. The COVID-19 vaccine.
On March 29th the ‘Silent No More’ movement was officially born in New Zealand. It was an event that was created out of a collective vision and a collective effort of numerous passionate Kiwis from around the country who all had a shared desire and need to come together to tell their story and to just be heard. People from right across the country gathered in front of parliament in a memorial service to grieve together, to tell their stories together, and to deliver their petition with 12,000 signatures (gathered in just 5 days) to parliament.
Some were grieving for the health that they, and so many fellow Kiwis, have now lost. Many permanently. Some were grieving for their loved ones who have paid the ultimate price from taking the COVID-19 vaccine. All were grieving for what has been done collectively to their country and its people. There were tears. A lot of tears. But it was a watershed moment for these people, and for the thousands of others who couldn’t be there but wanted to. No longer would they be hushed up, ignored, and ridiculed by their government and the media.
‘Little White Crosses’ is a moving song written by NZ song writer Aly Cook as a tribute to the ‘Silent No More’ memorial on March 29thhttps://youtu.be/2vdvE4HmplQ It is a reference and a tribute to all those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ that were hanging peacefully on a long piece of string in front of parliament for three weeks during the recent Wellington Freedom Camp.
The people of New Zealand MUST know the truth about what has really happened in this country since the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine began in mid 2021. Not what we have been told on an almost daily basis on our television screens from the government’s podium of the ‘single source of truth’, and not what we have been told by our mainstream media who have been paid $55 million+ by that ‘single source of truth’.
Before we proceed here, the following are a few sobering facts (not misinformation) that will not be told to the people of New Zealand from the ‘single source of truth’.
In New Zealand the current number of COVID-19 vaccine adverse reactions recorded on the official MedSafe database is more than 58,000. Recording a vaccine adverse reaction on the MedSafe database is not a quick and easy exercise that can be done in two minutes if you have a sore arm from the shot. It takes a lot of time and detail. You need to be committed to the cause to go into the system and input the required information. So it’s a fair bet that the majority of those 58,000+ Kiwis, or their doctors, who have taken the time and effort to do that would have had a significant reason to do it.
The majority of those 58,000+ adverse reactions have been recorded by doctors rather than the public, contrary to what the mainstream media have been saying. It is broadly agreed across the medical field around the world that only between 1% and 10% of vaccine adverse reactions will be officially recorded. Now do the maths on that one for New Zealand’s current figure.
There has been a massive increase in New Zealand, and around the world, of myocarditis (a crippling and life shortening injury to the heart) and pericarditis since the COVID vaccine rollout began. Hospitals across the country are bursting with these and similar heart related problems from the COVID-19 vaccine. So much so that on December 15th, 2021 the Ministry of Health sent a letter to all doctors in New Zealand titled ‘Urgent update on COVID-19 Vaccine-associated Myocarditis and Pericarditis’ highlighting the issue of myocarditis in relation to the COVID vaccine. The graph below shows the official government data for myocarditis and pericarditis in the United States over the last 12 years.
According to NZDSOS (NZ Doctors Speaking Out with Science) there have so far been at least 400+ deaths in New Zealand from the COVID vaccine. If we also apply the rule of thumb regarding numbers of deaths recorded versus the actual number (between 1% to 10%), then this becomes a difficult point to think about.
It’s hard to say exactly how many people in New Zealand have had life changing injuries or have died from the COVID-19 vaccine, but what is very clear as the evidence is increasingly showing, and as more and more people come forward with their stories, is that the number is EXTREMELY high. The damage from the COVID vaccine is like nothing that has been seen with any other vaccine in history. Not even close. That is not just in New Zealand, that is a global situation.
As a picture of vaccine injury catastrophe becomes clearer by the day, Pfizer and the New Zealand government may eventually try to say that they were just trying to do the right thing for the safety of the country, and that they couldn’t have known this type of catastrophic vaccine fall-out would happen. But shockingly, that has now been proven not to be the case. Pfizer and the New Zealand government absolutely did know. They had all the absolutely damning safety data showing this to be the case, and they both forged ahead regardless. It has now been confirmed that Pfizer knew full well from their initial safety trials, and from very early on in the vaccine roll out around the world, that their COVID-19 vaccine had devastating and unprecedented levels of serious adverse effects, including huge and historically unprecedented levels of fatalities.
As questions and scrutiny from doctors, scientists, and the public has intensified around the world regarding the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, this resulted in a stunning new development at the end of 2021 and early 2022 regarding safety data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Through a ‘Freedom of Information Act’ request by a group of doctors and scientists in the United States, a Federal judge ruled that the FDA (Federal Drug Agency tasked with authorising vaccines for public use) must release the 55,000 pages of safety data for the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine. Previously the FDA had requested that this data be locked up and withheld from the public for 75 years. Why would they want to bury that safety data for 75 years?
The first batches of this safety data have now been released to the public over the last two months and the information released so far is absolutely shocking. It is medically horrific. Hence why the FDA and Pfizer were desperate to keep it hidden for so long.
A total of 1,223 deaths were officially attributed to the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine in just the first three months (December 2020 to the end of February 2021) of the initial Pfizer vaccine roll out through various countries. Just as a point of historic comparison, in the past a vaccine trial or a vaccine programme would be immediately shut down with just a handful of fatalities. The Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine recorded 1,223 official fatalities in just three months and nothing was said or done by Pfizer or the FDA. Remember, the official figures typically only represent 1% to 10% of the real number.
As well as the huge number of fatalities, there were 42,086 adverse reactions officially recorded during that initial three month period. 58% of these 42,086 adverse reactions were classified as being serious, and at the time of publication of that Pfizer report 11,361 of those people had still not recovered. So the bottom line here is that the number of vaccine injuries in the first three months of the roll out of the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was enormous, with the majority of those injuries being serious and long lasting. The fatality rate of the vaccine was quite simply in a different universe to what had ever been seen before in the history of vaccines.
While this is absolutely shocking information to try to comprehend, what is even more shocking is the evidence obtained in January 2022 around the roll out of the COVID-19 vaccine in New Zealand. Through a request for information through the NZ ‘Official Information Act’, it is now confirmed and admitted by MedSafe that the New Zealand government were fully aware of this shocking and unprecedented Pfizer safety data when they rolled out their massive nationwide vaccination drive starting in mid 2021, several months after this Pfizer data was first known. The New Zealand government knew about this damning and unprecedented safety data when they rolled out their ‘90% vaxxed’ marketing campaign, they knew about it when they enforced their ‘no jab, no job’ mandates, and they knew about it when they implemented medical apartheid across the country with their vaccine passports to try to force the entire population to take the vaccine. The New Zealand government knew about the damning Pfizer safety data as they continued to drum out their ‘safe and effective’ mantra from their podium of truth to the people of New Zealand, and they demonised anyone daring to challenge this as being ‘vaccine hesitant’, ‘anti-vaxxers’, and dangerous peddlers of ‘vaccine misinformation’.
Here is an extract from the response from MedSafe to that ‘Official Information Act’ request. Among a number of questions asked to Medsafe in that request, here is Question 1;
“Please provide information to show when Pfizer or its agents first provided to any representative of the NZ government a copy of the CUMULATIVE-ANALYSIS-OF-POST-AUTHORIZATION-ADVERSE-EVENTREPORTS-OF-PF-07302048-BNT162B2-RECEIVED-THROUGH-28-FEB-2021 that was recently released through the US courts, ‘when did the New Zealand government first know about the safety data in that Pfizer report?’
(the same Pfizer safety data mentioned above)
The response from MedSafe to this question was;
“I can advise that as a part of the provisional consent for the Comirnaty COVID-19 granted in New Zealand under the Medicines Act 1981, Pfizer has provided the same data, albeit in a form that meets the company’s legal obligations in New Zealand. The conclusions of the Cumulative Analysis Report are consistent with the information and data provided by Pfizer to Medsafe as a part of its provisional consent obligations in New Zealand.”
Here is a link to the full letter of response from MedSafe.
Therefore, the New Zealand government had that exact same safety data as that damning Pfizer report when they made the decision to give the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine provisional consent for ‘emergency use authorisation’ in New Zealand and gave the go ahead to implement New Zealand’s mass COVID-19 vaccine roll out. A quite stunning and sobering thought that this could occur in this country.
Incredibly, it gets even worse than this. The Medical Council of New Zealand (MCNZ) essentially forced all doctors and health practitioners in New Zealand to support their ‘safe and effective’ narrative, and prohibited any discussion by these medical professionals that was in any way contrary to this narrative. They sent a letter to every doctor and health practitioner in New Zealand and effectively forced them not to deviate from the official government narrative about the COVID-19 vaccine being ‘safe and effective’. Here is an extract from that letter:
“As regulators we respect an individual’s right to have their own opinions, but it is our view that there is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, nor any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media and advertising by health practitioners.”
These doctors and health practitioners across the country have been seeing and dealing with unprecedented and truly shocking numbers of serious heart problems, blood clots, neurological issues, and numerous other serious adverse reactions from the COVID vaccine, and they have not been allowed to say anything to the New Zealand public other than to reinforce the COVID vaccine as ‘safe and effective’. Any doctors that have attempted to speak out and raise any kind of concerns about the COVID vaccine have been swiftly dealt to and suspended, and demonised by the mainstream media.
Therefore, every single one of the 95% of people in New Zealand who have taken the COVID vaccine have taken it under illegal circumstances. They have taken it without the legally required informed consent as they were not given the information about the true safety data that the government and the Ministry of Health knowingly had at the time, and doctors were prevented from raising any concerns with their patients so that the people of New Zealand could make an informed decision.
The New Zealand government effectively ‘forced’ 95% of the country to take the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine knowing full well the shocking safety data and fatality rate of that vaccine. A significant number of those 95% will have taken the COVID vaccine under severe duress and essentially against their will as so many people in New Zealand had seemingly very well founded concerns about this particular vaccine, but they felt they had no option but to take it due to the job mandates and/or vaccine passports. So many Kiwis have now paid a very large price for that.
Now, as more and more people in New Zealand come forward and are ‘silent no more’, we are starting to see what the true, awful impact of this has been. All the hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ hanging peacefully on that long piece of string in front of parliament for three weeks during the recent Wellington Freedom Camp. Those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ dangling there every day right in front of all the politicians inside the Beehive as a daily reminder to them that they had sanctioned the use of that Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine despite what was known about it, and they had also sanctioned the extreme measures implemented to ensure that nearly every person in New Zealand felt they had little choice but to take it. Is this why not one single politician inside the Beehive was prepared to come out and just speak with and listen to these people during those three weeks of the Wellington Freedom Camp?
As those hundreds of ‘little white crosses’ dangling in front of our politician’s offices eventually became just a little too emotionally awkward for them, on March 2nd those ‘little white crosses’ were unmercifully ripped down, burned to ashes, and banished from sight. But that has not ended things for the huge number of Kiwis whose lives have been destroyed, and whose loved ones are no longer with us.
“There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released. Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.” Hatchard Report
Yesterday there was a short article in the NZ Herald which discussed the release by the Ministry of Health of some data. The day before, writing in his column in the Northern Advocate, local opposition MP Dr Shane Reti reported that incidents of self harm among 10-14 year olds have increased by 30 percent since the arrival of Covid.
Disturbing though this is, the response was also disturbing, Shane Reti was admonished for writing about the data which was provided to him by the Ministry of Health. According to the article, Dr Reti should have asked the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little first. The Northern Advocate and Dr Reti apologised for the ‘confusion’ this caused.
Covid-19 data is being hidden There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released.
Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.
Yesterday our courts were also pondering the paucity of information released and its misleading character—some doctors and teachers were asking for a relaxing of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination mandates. Following the press coverage, it seems that the arguments being debated have already been decided by mainstream media for us.
The arguments are really very simple and the ‘facts’ are equally so. A tsunami of adverse effects Medsafe has published a summary of 53,000 adverse effects reported to them following Covid-19 vaccination. This is a per capita rate 30 times larger than that of any previous vaccination programme, and Medsafe itself admits that adverse effects are grossly underreported and uses the figure 95% unreported.
Now correct me if I’m wrong, but if I was in Medsafe or in politics I would be wanting to investigate this alarming figure more thoroughly. Given that a large percentage of our population are already affected and possibly at risk in the future, I would look very closely not just at the reports themselves but also at the specific categories of risk that Pfizer itself has already flagged. This is a very long list, now publicly available.
How would I do that? I would compile hospital admission data and GP visit data for these conditions. From Dr Shane Reti’s column, it appears that the Ministry of Health might have already done this, but they haven’t released the data and our politicians appear to be very worried that they might do so without first asking the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little. Very Little data has reached our ears.
I would also require an enhanced use of autopsy to determine if there were any unusual characteristics of deaths proximate to mRNA Covid vaccination similar to those reported overseas. These include preponderance of micro blood clotting, changes in character and viscosity of blood, and major organ damage.
Rather than talk to Pro-Festers at Parliament Grounds Freedom Village, the NZ corporation parading as government, desperate to be rid of them, have had Police block servicing of the portaloos. Not to be outdone, innovative Kiwis (as always) have simply built their own & titled them ‘The Peehive’, plumbers and builders who are part of the village having stepped up. Folk have even planted gardens there. See the link below the Peehive video for a short overview of what they are doing there. Unfortunately it is a mainstream propaganda piece as in they slant it against the profesters, nevertheless you get to hear the heart of those three amazing Voices For Freedom women. This article gives you a good photographic overview of what is happening there. EWR
UPDATE: Profesters also built a small shower block on wheels… the Police have since towed it away.
“Police are being difficult in regard to access of portaloo truck to empty the toilets. Work is now well underway building timber toilet outhouse building’s with flushing toilet suites connected into the localised sewer/manhole. The white tank pictured (off a small sucker truck) will pump out the portaloos when required, again, straight into the sewer main manhole.
Police were spotted filming the latest modifications. I’m sure they realise by now how resourceful we are as people here in the land of the long white cloud”
What a pity Melanie Reid didn’t take a leaf out of Liz Gunn’s book and publish some truth about the now well documented vaccine injuries and deaths. A brief visit to the Health Forum NZ’s tent at Parliament grounds would prove that beyond all doubt. They have all the citizen’s register figures and many testimonials of the trauma people experience, gaslighted because they dare to suggest it is the ‘safe and effective’ and ‘government approved’ vaccine that caused their injuries. Hear Lynda Wharton on that. ACC have received many thousands of claims.
But no, unfortunately mainstream journos prefer to not investigate those uncomfortable truths and lose their careers and salaries for doing so. Long ago sold out sadly.
WATCH AT THE LINK BELOW … you will also get a view of what the village has achieved in their two short weeks in residence:
The occupation of New Zealand’s Parliament Grounds in the capital city of Wellington and surrounding streets —which began at lunchtime on February 8th 2022 — appears to be growing into a bona-fide grass-roots peaceful uprising.
By Thursday 17 February, it was estimated there 10,000 people either occupying the grounds, or the surrounding streets and supporting the occupation while staying with friends, family or at accomodation in the city.
After sustaining repeated assaults from Police on Day 3 of their occupation, the New Zealand Liberty Movement’s presence swelled, as people came from all over the country, to ensure the numbers tipped the balance of power in favour of the occupation. The objective to pressure the NZ Government to drop the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ mandates regime is primarily being actuated by their key bargaining chip: bad optics.
If you thought the news on Friday about the lifting of mandates for NZDF and Police was amazing, we now have some more exciting news!
United We Stand, the group of Defence and Police staff that successfully challenged the government on the legality of their vaccine mandates, are now challenging the government on the mandatory use of COVID Vaccination Certificates (CVC or vaccine passports) right across the board for all Kiwis.
Their core arguments include the fundamental argument that CVCs do not prevent or limit the risk of outbreak or spread of COVID-19.
United We Stand are represented by Frontline Law that are asking that the COVID-19 Public Health Response (Protection Framework) Order 2021 is either revoked or amended to remove the CVC requirement by the 4th of March 2022 or they will apply for judicial review of the Order.
As a group of Defence and Police staff, United We Stand have said that they feel it is their duty to fight for New Zealanders and their freedoms. The vaccine passport system is divisive and a huge breach of fundamental rights that isn’t justified by the increasingly questionable benefit in stopping COVID-19 spread. A promise of removing it soon is not good enough. It needs to go now!
Public Statement by Guy Hatchard Ph.D. Following a meeting with the Chief Commissioner Paul Hunt of the NZ Human Rights Commission
23 February 2022
Thank you for providing the opportunity to present to yourself and staff yesterday afternoon. I did so as an individual scientist but on the invitation of Voices For Freedom. I remain independent of groups, but maintain communication with many groups and colleagues on scientific issues.
I am not a protestor, nor do I have any history prior to the pandemic of publicly opposing vaccination. I am formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).
I am a long standing advocate of the benefits and safety of those natural approaches to diet and medicine which have been adequately scientifically verified. I have my own website, HatchardReport.com.
At the conclusion of the meeting you said that the HRC would make a public statement and left the participants free to make public statements themselves. Thank you.
This morning I read your public statement following the meeting which affirms that you feel a duty to listen, and adduces “It’s clear that the protesters who I have met with have very real stories of loss and suffering. They feel broken and discarded due to the impact of Covid-19 health measures on their lives.” You also expressed a measure of caution.
As a person experienced in the analysis of data and the assessment of scientific information, I am increasingly aware of deficiencies in official NZ pandemic data and its use to support continuations of now outdated government policy. Outdated government policy and incomplete official data directly impacts the rights of individuals.
For example, since 21 August 2021, the Ministry of Health (MoH) has been publishing data related to the Covid outbreak in a cumulative fashion. This data shows that 60% of cases occur in the vaccinated (against a vaccinated population rate of 79%), and that 70% of hospitalisations are among the unvaccinated.
This appears to strongly support vaccination, however it is misleading due to the cumulative nature of the data, (and incidentally because of the way vaccination status is categorised). Cumulative data only reveals the average of the whole outbreak, not the current daily and weekly trends.
Since October 2021, members of my support team have been calculating ‘snapshots’ of data by subtracting report data from each subsequent report. This has allowed me to see the current burden of cases by vaccination status for any specific time period, and to calculate the hospitalisation risk disparity for cases by vaccination status. Below is an example of the data between February 17 and 18:
This snapshot data paints a very different and relevant picture. It is indicative that during the present phase of our Covid outbreak, those that are vaccinated may be at slightly higher risk of hospitalisation than those who are unvaccinated. The general trends and overseas data support this concern.
You will be well aware that this is in contrast to government and media messaging strongly encouraging booster vaccinations as essential. If you ignore the crucial issue of very high rates of adverse effects, this could possibly be supported by the historical cumulative Covid data, but it is certainly not supported by current data.
The reason for the ineffectiveness of mRNA vaccination must also be obvious to you from yesterday’s presentations and the supporting submissions provided to you by presenters. The characteristics of Omicron are quite different from those of Delta. Omicron is a variant that has adapted to prefer infection of vaccinated individuals. From the perspective of genomics, this results from the well documented path of viral evolution.
I note that Medsafe has admitted in small print on its website, generally unnoticed and uncommented by media, that the phenomenon of vaccine acquired immune deficiency (which I allude to above) is a risk about which they have concern.
The Human Rights implications of this are also obvious. Incentives and encouragement to vaccinate, when its benefit is in doubt, but the risk of harm is well documented, do not amount to a process of informed consent or medical risk mitigation. Today in your public statement you clearly extend personal sympathy to those affected by adverse vaccine reactions.
Many among the wider population are becoming aware of risks through personal experiences. For example a friend of mine is a director of a large business, one of his relatives has been affected by myocarditis, but his work colleagues remained sceptical of any risk.
Recently the father of one of their employees had a booster shot immediately followed by a massive heart attack. As a result, the opinion of his colleagues has swung back in full support of my friend’s informed choice. This kind of experience is reforming public opinion up and down the country (and even I have heard in Parliament). It is no surprise that booster uptake has barely reached 50% of those eligible.
I come to the point of my writing, in addition to a big thank you for taking the time to listen at length, I submit that the human rights abuses are a matter of daily misery for many, extending to some dramatic and devastating personal health impacts which are escalating as booster shots are rolled out. In my opinion, it is not tenable to delay action.
The government has curated extremes of public opinion fearful of Covid outcomes, in favour of experimental mRNA vaccination, and prejudiced against those reluctant to vaccinate. As you know, this has extended to punitive measures.
As published evidence has accumulated which points to increased health risks of vaccination and therefore a need to revise policy, the government has dug its heels in and doubled down on announcements of vaccine safety and effectiveness. The Ministry of Health’s restricted presentation of data along with its refusal to institute mandatory reporting of adverse effects verges on the deliberately misleading and implies a cover up.
I surmise from your extensive history of supporting human rights, that you will know there is a fine line between unfortunate mistakes and deliberate suppression of fact. I believe that line is now being crossed in New Zealand.
Leadership in this situation involves a willingness to speak up, even if the message may be unwelcome, and a capacity to change direction. Every day that passes by without action means growing economic misery and exclusion for some and crucially some serious health incidents for others. There is an imperative for the Commission to stand up and say unequivocally there is a case which has been made and needs to be answered. A case that requires an open public dialogue.
Therefore I warmly welcome your statement:
“The job given to the Human Rights Commission, Te Kāhui Tika Tangata, by Parliament is to listen, conciliate, educate and advance human rights and responsibilities for all”
I am asking you here to follow this statement with a timely call for a wider public process that will go beyond a possibly poorly informed, and certainly based on past experience, opaque review confined within the corridors of parliamentary power. The HRC is there to protect and uphold rights independently from parliament.
As I indicated in my submission, incidence of adverse effects and death proximate to Covid vaccination in NZ and elsewhere have far surpassed thresholds set by medical ethics and protocol that should also trigger an immediate pause in vaccination. This is not a time to delay, the situation has already passed beyond a point requiring prompt action. Can you please advise me of the intended HRC time frame?
I will, as you have already indicated I may, make this statement publicly available.
I look forward to hearing more from the Commission shortly. I remain ready to provide any scientific information you need within a short time frame. As you know, I have already submitted to the HRC a list of 1000 published papers on adverse effects of mRNA vaccination.
A decision by a New Zealand High Court judge who ruled the vaccine mandates for NZ police and defense force staff were unlawful — is a major chink in the armor of the Government’s Covid Regime.
Justice Francis Cooke who acknowledged the complainants had the right to refuse a medical treatment and that their employment should not be threatened by such a refusal — also stated the mandatesbreached the Bill of Rights and were a coercive measure that infringed upon domestic and international law.
This decision, released Friday February 24 2022, comes amid an escalation in the Wellington District Police command’s siege strategy throughout this week. This siege strategy — which has seen the placement of several dozen half-tonne bollards to encircle the Freedom Occupation’s vehicles, supporting infrastructure and access points — was a provocative move to forestall the Ardern Government having to parlay with the Covid-mandate resistors.
This dispatch concludes that the position of the New Zealand Police is untenable, especially since they have been beating up, arresting and otherwise intimidating those awake Kiwis who made the effort to demonstrate as peacefully as they could in Wellington. Their resolve to peacefully protest — amid repeated unlawful provocations by the Constabulary — to end the vaccine mandates regime, is now vindicated by this High Court decision that the vaccine mandates imposed on the police and defense force are unlawful.
Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards points out the NZ Police, the Ardern Government and the Wellington Political Elite have lost their sanctimonious legal, political and moral high ground to claim the Freedom Occupiers have no legal right to camp at Parliament Grounds and the surrounding streets.
Given the High Court has ruled that the vaccine mandates imposed on the very forces the state can wield to remove the totalitarian resistors are actually unlawful, the Ardern Government, NZ Police and Wellington Political Elite should capitulate immediately —and with great humility —admit they were wrong to breach New Zealanders’ rights to economic security.
In this crucial win for the anti-mandate occupiers at Parliament Grounds, Justice Francis Cooke acknowledged the complainants had the right to refuse a medical treatment and that their employment should not be threatened by such a refusal.
Suspended workers of the New Zealand Police and Defence Force who challenged the Covid-19 vaccine mandates in the High Court should now be able to return to work, said Justice Cooke.
Justice Cooke admitted that the vaccine mandates for police and defense forces were implemented to promote public confidence in those services, rather than to stop the spread of Covid-19. Justice Francis Cooke stated:
“In essence, the order mandating vaccinations for police and NZDF staff was imposed to ensure the continuity of the public services, and to promote public confidence in those services, rather than to stop the spread of Covid-19. Indeed health advice provided to the government was that further mandates were not required to restrict the spread of Covid-19. I am not satisfied that continuity of these services is materially advanced by the order.”
Wake Up Kiwi: The Right Side Of History: Wellington Update
Right now, all eyes are on Wellington, and the world watched our politicians cower behind a wall of shamefully compromised police officers. Their yellow bellies were on full display, and millions are witnessing their despicable actions. Regardless of what happens next, exposure of their deplorable behaviour will go down in history as a massive turning point in the battle for freedom.
The lies and tyranny will collapse under the weight of truth piling up. Soon, someone will break ranks, and the dominoes will begin to fall.
We will keep pushing forward until it happens. Some politicians are even starting to make noises in this space as they recognise that this is not a fringe minority.
But, we must keep the pressure on..
Vax mandates divide our nation, impact New Zealanders’ ability to work and provide for their families, and participate in life in general. It remains our goal to increase public awareness of these things.
By awakening enough of the people of New Zealand, the mandates will inevitably fall.
Whether it happens today, at the next demonstration, or the one after, it will happen; it is unstoppable.
And, until then, every single action makes a difference.
Here are some incredible wins to acknowledge so far with the Freedom Convoy and EVERYONE involved!
Kiwis in their tens of thousands have stood up and spoken out – they drove in cars, trucks, motorhomes, motorbikes and even push-bikes in the convoy. They stood on roadsides and over-bridges and shared on social media.
People have rallied around to supply food, water, necessities, and support to those dedicated to the cause. THIS is the New Zealand we all know and love.
Hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders have seen us. They have seen the heart of this peaceful movement. They are beginning to understand we are many, and we are standing for them.
The disgraceful behaviour of our politicians and police has been in full sight. The people have seen the refusal of the MPs to come outside Parliament and listen to legitimate democratic protest. They have witnessed the completely unnecessary police brutality in the face of a peaceful stand.
Even the mainstream media has been unable to ignore us any longer, with all newspapers and television channels covering the story (albeit facts often losing to their fiction).
National and Act have shown we have no true opposition in this Government. All are captured. However, they have at least had to move to demand a timeframe to the end of the mandates.
Finally, we have seen ex MPs speaking up – Rodney Hide, Matt King and Winston Peters have been forthright in their condemnation of the Government’s treatment of New Zealanders making a peaceful stand.
Our voice and message are being heard. Now is not the time to give up – it is time to think and act strategically.
Those in Wellington are calling for support – and numbers matter!
People ARE legally permitted to gather on the streets surrounding the grounds, so if you are willing and able, let’s wrap our support around Wellington.
We know that more people plan to convoy down to Wellington from other parts of the country. If this is your plan, please be mindful of the situation you will be entering and come prepared. Make sure you have somewhere to stay, food, water, and appropriate clothing.
And a reminder that Voices for Freedom stands for integrity, honour and respect. We do not condone aggressive, violent or unlawful behaviour. We encourage people to act calmly and respectfully, even when opposed or challenged, in line with our Code Of Conduct. In The Meantime..
Let’s continue to show the rest of the country, and indeed the world, that Kiwis are peaceful and dedicated in their stand for our freedoms! Let’s get out on the streets to stand in solidarity throughout New Zealand.
>>>> AND BE SURE TO CAPTURE IT ON CAMERA <<<<
Remember, we’re all in this together. We are going to get out of it together too.
We’ve all been watching the incredible scenes in Wellington, as well as Canberra and Ottawa. Unprecedented historic gatherings to fight for freedom of those respective countries.
It’s really great to see Groundswell and ‘NZ Farming’ both coming out recently in support of the Wellington Freedom Camp. But now we need you all supporting this unprecedented movement in huge numbers on the ground as well as in your great words of support.
Groundswell achieved something really incredible when it got tens of thousands of tractors rolling through towns and cities right across New Zealand last year. It was so massive that it absolutely rocked and shocked the NZ government to its core with the gigantic scale of the turnout. It is quite possibly the seed that germinated into the current massive truck convoys around the world, including NZ.
Groundswell have been very much focusing their actions and attention around the ridiculously restrictive and impossible farming legislation being rolled out by the government, and have so far stayed away from mixing with the various protest actions around the government’s COVID policies and vaccine mandates. But right now, the Wellington Freedom Camp needs all hands on deck, irrespective of potential differences of opinion with some people on certain things around the vaccine issue. A fully united approach is needed from all sectors of NZ society and all Kiwis. The Wellington Freedom Camp is not specifically an anti-vax or anti-mandate rally. In fact, a significant percentage of the people at the Wellington Freedom Camp are fully vaxxed. The Wellington Freedom Camp is representative of the whole country standing up and saying NO to a government that is totally out of control on every single front of NZ life, including vaccine mandates which are creating apartheid, insane farming legislation, and countless other major issues right across the board of NZ society.
Many involved in the Groundswell movement were sparked into action last year by learning the disconcerting knowledge of how the NZ government is deliberately and completely selling NZ out, including the farming sector, through the implementation of United Nations Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030 not only have the intention of wiping out local farming in NZ, but also the intention of wiping out our entire way of living and our freedoms for all Kiwis. Wiping out the farming sector as well as controlling all people through vaccine mandates linked to Digital IDs are both crucial elements of UN Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. So we are all in this thing together. There is already a direct crossover between the farming sector and the vaccine mandates with the recent announcements of Silver Fern and Fonterra staff being mandated for COVID vaccines, which is leading to huge job losses in those companies.
So in reality the Wellington Freedom Camp needs to represent all of NZ and all sectors coming together to say NO to UN Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. It is about NZ collectively standing up and saying to the government that the way we are being governed as a nation, and taking NZ headlong into these extreme globalist agendas is not at all acceptable and that we need a very different way of our country operating. Whether that relates to COVID policies, vaccine mandates, or farming legislation is irrelevant. It is all a part of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. We only have to look at how parliament and the government are treating the people at the Wellington Freedom Camp to know that something is very very wrong with the way this country is being operated. A totally peaceful protest has been met with brutal police force, followed by military style ‘psychological torture tactics’ of water sprinklers and music being blasted all night, and a total refusal to even engage in any type of dialogue. It is a government totally out of control, in all ways, not just on one specific issue. This problem requires a united approach to a shared and very major problem.
Groundswell has the potential to make an incredibly positive impact. If activated in the right way, Groundswell could make a thundering, nation changing impact in addition to the Wellington gathering, which is already an incredible stand by amazing patriotic Kiwis. With Wellington’s city centre already locked up by trucks, vans, and other vehicles, imagine the impact if 100-200 (or more) tractors rolling in to the centre of every major city in NZ. Then 50 tractors (or more) rolling into the centre of every town across NZ. How would Jacinda’s words look then when she labels this movement as nothing more than a small, irrelevant, and fringe minority of out of touch and crazy anti-vaxxers?
The Governor General is officially the only one who can dissolve parliament. What if Groundswell surrounded the Governor General with tractors until it was agreed to dissolve parliament? We need a new way of governing that doesn’t sell out our country to the extreme globalist ideas of Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. If National were in power, or do get into power, things will be no different either.
The mainstream media is the biggest weapon that the NZ government has for implementing Agenda 21 and Agenda 2030. What if Groundswell surrounded all the main media networks with tractors until they agreed to tell the NZ people the truth instead of just being a paid off and controlled mouthpiece of the government and their extreme globalist agendas?
Groundswell could make a huge impact to help change and save this nation right now, including saving and turning around the farming sector as a key part of that. The Wellington Freedom Camp cannot just be a matter of getting the vaccine mandates dropped and everyone goes home with the job done. The job most definitely will not be done. It requires fundamental and seismic change to where and how our country is going in relation to these extreme globalist agendas and systems of control. It is literally now or never for NZ’s future. Everyone needs to unite together to help get this job done.
Tractors and Truckies coming together to save New Zealand. Let’s go tractors!
This is a post written by Bryce McKenzie and is a feeling the rest of us in Groundswell NZ share. Groundswell NZ’s main focus continues to be on the unworkable regulations impacting the rural sector. Like increasing numbers of New Zealanders, farmers have felt badly maligned by this current government and its policies. Like the protestors in Wellington we also have been ignored by the Government and called denigrating names. We can empathize with their frustration.
Whether you agree or not with the people protesting on parliament grounds is not the debate anymore.
What this government, that proclaimed it would govern for all New Zealanders, has done is turn its back on a good number of its people.
How hard can it be to at least front up and talk to the people assembled on parliament grounds? The final straw for me and what prompted me to go public, is the way government is treating these people – turning the sprinklers on them knowing there was a storm coming, and playing loud music at night so as to not let them sleep and make them feel miserable – no farmer would treat animals like that!
Although this protest has a different focus to Groundswell NZ, we support their right to be heard and cannot understand or agree with the Governments actions.
What is becoming of our once united and proud country
“NgAngA has hit the national news headlines in recent weeks with his innovative business approach …” Kiwi4Justice
He just calls himself NgAngA. The name is from his Australian Aboriginal tribe and it means ‘Peace Maker’. When you look around his quite incredible Café-Art Theatre in Collingwood, Golden Bay, it is very clear that the name is highly appropriate, and that NgAngA is no ordinary human-being.
A freedom rally in Wellington Thursday 16th Dec, 2021. A great success by reports I’ve seen and heard. Of most note is whore media’s ongoing lying. They reported there were just a few thousand there … yet people on the ground estimated a whopping 20 to 30K. People have had enough … enough of all the inconsistencies, the lies, the silence on the independent data ….
Where to spend your dollars? This is from the Health Forum NZ. PB Tech announces in-store sales are for the vaxxed only. Not a legal requirement, however this store has opted to exclude the unvaxxed who are only able, if they wish to shop there, to purchase via click and collect. No thanks PB Tech.
From the Health Forum NZ at MeWe. Examining the strange case of how vaccinations came to be scheduled for children and youth.
Yesterday the government announced that they would begin vaccinating 5 to 11 year olds before the end of January 2022. WHY? We examine the strange case of how vaccinations came to be scheduled for children and youth.
Harm from covid for children and young adults is incredibly rare
A study published in Nature drawing upon multiple studies finds the death among children under 18 years from covid is ‘incredibly rare’. The recorded rate of death is just 2 in each million cases. Half of these are clearly linked to comorbidities. This is very very very low. To put this in perspective the all cause death rate among the 15-19 age group in NZ is of the order of 500 per million per year which utterly dwarfs possible covid deaths. So there is nothing significant to fear. Virtually all children and young adults catching covid will experience very mild symptoms and develop long lasting natural immunity, rather than the rapidly waning partial immunity conferred by vaccination, which will necessitate regular jabs in future.
NZ’s lamestream media reports on a press conference in Northland where the folk are not too sucked in by the pressure to be injected with the untested, still trialing, mRNA experimental jab.
With typical lamestream bias anybody asking pertinent questions of the (not) esteemed PM Ardern is dubbed a ‘heckler’ as was the man with a question about Israel, and the woman speaking up loudly about sovereignty is predictably assigned to the ‘anti-vax’ basket. The conference moved inside, to exclude the ‘hecklers’.
I reject this Amendment Bill as well as the original Health Response Bill No.1. In particular I reject all aspects of it related to the COVID-19 vaccine. Any continued roll out of the current mass vaccine programme, especially the continuation and increasing powers of vaccine mandates through Vaccine certificates and ‘no jab, no job’ is by law a crime against humanity according to the 1947 Nuremberg Code (see Appendix for reference) as well as the NZ Bill of Rights. Even ‘coercion’ for the COVID-19 vaccine is classified as a crime against humanity according to the Nuremberg Code…