Mark Crispin Miller
Health Impact News
Mark Crispin Miller
Health Impact News
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
Reignite Democracy Australia, which was started by journalist Monica Smit, an outspoken critic on authoritarian lockdowns in Australia who was just released from jail on bond last week, has started a group called “Nurses Speak Out” where gagged nurses are speaking out about the truth of what is currently going on inside of hospitals with people suffering from vaccine injuries.
They are posting these stories on their Telegram channel as well.
This is an Anonymous whistleblowing channel for Nurses & Healthcare workers in Australia. We will share verified experiences from frontline workers who see firsthand the damage caused by COVID-19 vaccinations.
These submissions have been vetted by a collective of health professionals. Some details may be omitted, your identity will be protected. AHPRA has gagged, coerced and threatened anyone who comes forward – let’s save some lives.
This channel is dedicated to all frontline workers around the world. This is Australia. This is for you.
Here are some of their stories that have just been published.
I’m a community RN on the —— , Qld.
I am seeing and caring for adversely affected clients who have had the vaccines and are quite literally dying. Our palliative care is increasing at an exponential rate, people are getting diagnosed with terminal conditions and dying quickly. We (community nurses) are seeing 2-3 palliative clients per day each, this is a massive increase from 1-2 each per week. Other palliative clients who haven’t been vaxxed, then their families talk them into the vax, die more quickly than expected.
Have noted that those who are vaxxed that their clinically ‘weak’ areas are being exacerbated. Appears to be at 3, 5 then 12 week patterned intervals. Not one of them associate with the C19vax.
Had one man in his 70’s in very stable remission with leukemia for years. Within 3 weeks of having ‘the vaccine’ his white cell count dropped so he had neutropenia. He suddenly developed in 24 hours bilateral cellulitis to both legs up to thighs. 9 weeks later, he is dead.
From The Health Forum NZ @ Facebook
World wide the call has been to send teams door to door (in some places accompanied by the military or the Police) to administer the CV VX.
The Whanganui DHB is ‘getting the vx to the vulnerable’ by sending a team of two to your door. The ‘disabled, frail or elderly’ who can’t make it to the clinic. The team will be increased to four in August and so far 20,000 doses have been delivered in the Whanganui area.
Read the facebook news item at this link.
Should you be unaware of the list of full, possible side effects provided by the FDA, which note, exceed considerably the list provided on the NZ health website see details below.
Here are those supplied by the authorities in NZ:
In the clinical trials, uncommon side effects were reported in every 1 in 100 to 1 in 1,000 people. These include:
This is a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US (link below):
Guillain-Barre syndrome, Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, Transverse myelitis,
Encephalitis, Myelitis, Encephalomyelitis, Meningoencephalitis, Meningitis, Encephalopathy,
Convulsions, Seizures, Stroke, Narcolepsy, Cataplexy, Anaphylaxis, Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack), Myocarditis, Pericarditis, Autoimmune disease, Death, Pregnancy, Birth outcomes,
Other acute demyelinating diseases, Non anaphylactic allergy reactions, Thromocytopenia,
Disseminated intravascular coagulation, Venous thromboembolism, Arthritis, Arthralgia, Joint pain,
Kawasaki disease, Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children, Vaccine enhanced disease.
https://www.fda.gov/media/143557/download (see page 17)
You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death. Below are the deaths & injuries reported to the official government data bases that occurred after taking the covid-19 injection. Remember only 1% on average are reporting.
CURRENT DEATH & INJURY STATS REPORTED:
USA: DEATHS – 9,048 INJURIES: 520,747 (to July 2 )
UK: 1,403 DEATHS – INJURIES 1,007,253 (to June 23)
EUROPE: 17,503 – INJURIES 1,687,527 (to July 3)
AUSTRALIA – 313 DEATHS – 24000 INJURIES (to 20 June)
For the articles on the deaths and injuries cited, go to the news page and at the right hand column, click on the images stating the stats.
Photo: Google maps
Two items have come to light regarding the refusal by insurance companies to insure. This is on top of governments absolving the Pharmaceutical companies producing the injections from any liability. And we are still expected to willingly receive the jab? This is like putting your nearest and dearest on a flimsy raft without life jackets & pushing them out onto the ocean with a hurricane brewing on the horizon.
Regarding the blood clots/AstraZeneca vax issue … in spite of the news here of certain countries suspending its use because of the issue, NZ mainstream news continues to assure us there is no connection. Another coincidence I gather? EWR
Here are two related posts from C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand
Australia….Guild Insurance pausing insurance of nurses administering Covid vaccination….The Actuaries have obviously done their homework and worked out that they could potentially be bankrupted by injured vaccine recipients suing the nurses and doctors who administered the vaccine. Click on this link to see the video at FB: https://www.facebook.com/australiansvstheagenda/posts/395850001867611
Meanwhile in Australia…Nurses administering covid vaccines are no longer covered by this insurer….The government continues to assure Australians the Astra Zeneca vaccine is safe (this is the primary vax used in Australia)….And 10 European countries have now halted use pending investigation into blood clots and strokes post vax
From the C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand Facebook page
Australian Doctors, nurses and pharmacists who spread COVID anti-vaccination claims will face harsh penalties, including being stripped of their ability to practise, by the medical watchdog. The national medical boards and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency (AHPRA) released a joint directive warning healthcare practitioners that they risk regulatory action if they spout false or deceptive misinformation to patients or on social media that could undermine the national vaccination program as the AstraZeneca vaccine rollout begins.There is no place for anti-vaccination messages in professional health practice, and any promotion of anti-vaccination claims including on social media, and advertising may be subject to regulatory action,” spokesman for the medical boards and Pharmacy Board chairman Brett Simmonds said.I ask myself, “what constitutes anti vaccine messages”? Does this law prevent medical personnel from participating in a genuine “informed consent” process in their practice? If they have concerns about the vaccine and their patient asks them questions….does this law prohibit them from sharing their medical concerns? Can they discuss with patients anything relating to…
*there is no long term safety data
*clinical trials are continuing until 2023…but vaccines are being administered globally “in the meantime”.
*serious injuries and deaths occurring within hours or a few days of receiving the vaccination are mounting.
*the mRNA delivery platform has never been used in human vaccination before.
*there are questions and concerns about the potential for Antibody Dependent Enhancement (a worsening of disease when you are exposed to the wild virus having had the vaccine).
*there is NO SAFETY data for use during pregnancy, auto immune disease, breast feeding.
*there is NO SAFETY data looking at any potential risk of vaccination in combination with pre existing pharmaceuticals being taken.
*there is NO DATA confirming that this vaccine will stop you from contracting Covid 19, OR TRANSMITTING it to someone else.
How do you do your job to “first do no harm”, and remain open, honest and able to discuss and advise on an individual “risk/benefit” basis, when you are gagged and your medical license is threatened, for doing so. This is serious and dangerous.
READ THE ARTICLE AT THE LINK:
“Doctors, nurses and pharmacists who spread COVID anti-vaccination claims will face harsh penalties, including being stripped of their ability to practise, by the medical watchdog.
The national medical boards and the Australian Health Practitioner Regulatory Agency (AHPRA) released a joint directive warning healthcare practitioners that they risk regulatory action if they spout false or deceptive misinformation to patients or on social media that could undermine the national vaccination program as the AstraZeneca vaccine rollout begins.”
“A poll showed half of surveyed nurses and quarter of doctors did not want to be vaccinated” (Financial Times)
“Up to 60% of Doctors, Nurses and front line medical workers are declining the vaccines, based on the knowledge that the data confirming long term safety is 100% ABSENT”
Traditionally vaccination is one of the most revered cornerstones of Western Medical practice. Doctors administer vaccines; willingly accept vaccination themselves, and the majority are staunchly pro vaccine. Many trust and revere their doctors, and unquestioningly accept the practices of Western medicine…including vaccination. But what happens when these trusted Doctors and Nurses, themselves refuse to accept the vaccines, purportedly offering us the most powerful solution to our Pandemic woes? What happens? The “Vaccine Hesitant” (those fully vaccinated people who just have a funny feeling in their gut about this one), see their trusted vaccination role models running for the hills, sleeves fully buttoned down…and think to themselves….
“If THEY are not having it (the upholders of the vaccine paradigm)….they know something I don’t know….so count me OUT” . Up to 60% of Doctors, Nurses and front line medical workers are declining the vaccines, based on the knowledge that the data confirming long term safety is 100% ABSENT. No doubt they will have first used their medical brains to weigh up their personal risk/benefit profile.
READ AT THE LINK BELOW
Note, not all medical professionals are okay with the official narrative .. EWR
“An independent non-profit alliance of doctors, nurses, healthcare professionals and staff around the world who have united in the wake of the Covid-19 response chapter to share experiences with a view to ending all lockdowns and related damaging measures and to re-establish universal health determinance of psychological and physical wellbeing for all humanity.
WDA represents a diverse range of opinions of health care professionals and does not have a consensus of opinions on the origin of covid-19 or the political ramifications of the lockdown per se. WDA is however committed to debate the causes of harm resulting from the coronavirus act measures and to raise issues that expose harmful medical and life limiting practices detrimental to the well being of all living men women and children.”
Coffee County in Kansas has roughly 8,500 residents, but they won’t be getting their COVID-19 shots from the county health department’s four nurses.
Department chief Lindsay Payer and her staffers have opted out of giving the injections because they have doubts about the safety of the Moderna vaccine, which the county is offering, local TV station WIBW reported.
Payer told WIBW that her employees made up their own minds and “not without considerable thought.” The county will hire at least one outside nurse, who will be paid with COVID-19 funds.
“I will tell you we will have to contract staff…because my staff is not comfortable with that. It’s a new technology. We’ve never seen it before. It was only studied in 45 people before it was approved…,” Payer said.
A Doctor (first video) and a nurse (second) a patient in the third. Watch & listen to their concerns. The Doctor is fed up that others are not speaking up & blowing the whistle on the way covid 19 is being diagnosed giving falsely inflated stats. The nurse, saying both Doctors & Nurses are aware, says they are basically told to do as they’re told … their hands are tied.
Below, now swabs, no tests, diagnosed with covid 19
the video below was posted here a few days ago also… Dr Annie Bukacek
“….three doctors (an anesthesiologist, an obstetrician and a pediatrician) took an hour to kill a newborn. Because as it was alive, the child struggled vigorously and they could not give him the lethal injection…”
“…The doctor came in and asked me if he was still breathing, or else we would make an injection for that “to be resolved.” Five minutes later he came back and grabbed a syringe. … He then pierced the baby in the heart…”
(LiveActionNews) – In the United States, the Born Alive Infant Protection Act requires abortionists and staff to give medical care to a child accidentally born alive during an abortion. However, Live Action has discovered through undercover investigations that many abortionists ignore this law.
abies are also born alive after abortions in Europe. The ACLJ, which is promoting legislation to protect these infants, has compiled testimonies from nurses and midwives.
MK, a student nurse in France, tells the following story:
The child was born alive, and to prevent it from crying, the doctor quickly covered his face. He was then taken into a side room…. I was able to find that there was no apparent defect, he struggled to breathe and he had some slight gestures. He was fully formed, had eyelashes, hair, nails … …The doctor came in and asked me if he was still breathing, or else we would make an injection for that “to be resolved.” Five minutes later he came back and grabbed a syringe. … He then pierced the baby in the heart, …The child, during the injection, moved all its members. I do not know what that meant, but perhaps he suffered. The little boy lived just a quarter of an hour. The medical team told the parents of the child that he was stillborn. This is why we did not want him to cry at birth: it would be too traumatic for them. What shocked me personally, is the cold-blooded doctor (head of department) that had injected the child in the heart. The fact that the child was alive was a problem that needed to be addressed: it has never been contemplated to tell the parents what really happened.
Mr. XB, a doctor, gave the shocking revelation that the head of the Genetics Department of a hospital in the South of France ordered that babies in the third trimester be aborted alive, so that their brain tissue would be fresh for research. When XB left the hospital, he spoke to a nurse and expressed his disgust at the infanticides:
For obvious reasons, neither the child nor the school are named regarding this incident. It is a warning bell to be vigilant and certainly confirms other things I’ve been hearing regarding the coercion employed against those who choose not to vaccinate. It is a parental right not to. I have personally heard of people visiting and knocking more than one time at the door of non vaccinating parents, asking to vaccinate their newborn. It is a similar scenario with the flu vax. Elderly people tell me they are phoned up by their medical practice and told, ‘you haven’t had your flu jab’. Not given all the info and insert on risks involved, and asked ‘do you want one?’ That is coercion in my opinion and if you think that is extreme read this article to learn why you should be asking questions. I also know of another mother who asked many questions around the testing of a certain vaccine who ended up leaving the responding nurse with raised eyebrows. We recently posted an article that featured a NZ whistle blower who worked in a nursing home for the elderly, alerting to the deaths following vaccines, some vaccinated without family consent. You can read about that here. Vaccination is not compulsory and a parent’s and individual’s right of choice needs to be respected and heeded. Dealing to children in the way described here is absolutely not on.
“…all the children who had returned “no” consent forms, were gathered in a separate group and the nurses berated the girls telling them that their parents didn’t love them, and that they could consent on their own, without their parent’s permission.”
In today’s Herald on Sunday was an article about Waitetuna school near Raglan, where the school principal agreed to allow a midwife to show a film about the other side of vaccines on the school premises, but the board of Trustees overturned her agreement, on the basis that the topic was controversial.
I have a question. What are schools for?
Education, or social engineering? George Orwell wrote a book called “Animal Farm” Have you read it?
If a parent from Waitetuna school objected to nurses and doctors coming into the school and vaccinating children, would the Board of Trustees agree and stop them coming in because vaccines are controversial?
I somehow doubt it.
But I want to tell you a story of a young child, in a school, who along with some other children, returned a consent form for the HPV vaccine, which said, “No, I do not consent”.
What happened next will illustrate that New Zealand schools are not safe for children, and why the Department of Health vaccination programmes should be barred from schools.
The forms were collected and all the children who had returned “no” consent forms, were gathered in a separate group and the nurses berated the girls telling them that their parents didn’t love them, and that they could consent on their own, without their parent’s permission. One of the girls caved to that, but then another child who had watched the life of an older sibling be trashed and lead to a quality of life less than desirable, fought back. She refused to sign it. The nurses pushed. But she got angry and told the nurse that she wanted to go now. The nurse refused. The girl then told the vaccinating nurse that she wanted to call her parents and the police because what they were doing was wrong. Nothing like the experience of your own eyes, to firm up your own convictions!
At this point, she was quickly hustled out of the room in order not to freak out the other girls being pressured into going against their parent’s wishes.
How did all this situation come about?
The Department of Health, with school consent, seems to have started using the tactic of not telling the schools when they are coming to vaccinate. Their ostensible reason for this, is so that the children don’t get worried in advance.
What a load of bollocks.
The real reason is so that the parents of the non-vaccinators can’t keep their children home for that day, which allows the provaccine including the nurses, teachers and other pupils, to bully and berate children whose parents have chosen differently.
So while parents who don’t consent, would rather not send their children to school on that day, the Department of Health deliberately thwarts that option. This could be called revoking democratic decision making.
Of course in this mind-numbed unethical climate of bullying, emotional blackmail and … yes … controversy, such tactics are considered to be noble, wonderful and lifesaving.
Vaccinations ARE indeed a controversial topic of discussion. I believe that if schools refuse to allow parents to watch a film at a school, describing another side of vaccination, then schools should ALSO refuse to allow the Department of Health to vaccinate children in schools.
The issue isn’t just “controversy”. It’s one of non-hypocrisy. What is “education”? How do you define learning? Only by hearing one side of a story?
Do you send your children to school, and allow the Department of Health to vaccinate your children in school because you can’t be bothered making the effort to follow through on your own convictions? Shouldn’t parents who chose to vaccinate, be responsible for doing that at their doctors?
Would you like schools to also become places where children can also be prescribed antibiotics, prescription drugs, or even, abortion on demand?
Or should schools SOLELY be places where people are educated and learn to think, in particular to figure out how to make their own decisions without being brainwashed by the school or the state?
Comment: if you think NZ won’t do this read this ‘thin end of the wedge’ from Labour last year:
“One of the freedoms enjoyed by “extremist” religious people in New Zealand may be curtailed under a Labour-led Government.Health spokesman and Dunedin North MP David Clark said he would support New Zealand following Australia and banning unvaccinated children from child care centres and preschools.”
Australia is saying folk will be prosecuted even for … expressing doubt about the effectiveness of vaccinations or urging further studies into vaccine safety.” That should ring loud warning bells.. a nation that does not allow further safety studies is blind indeed. A slippery slope to be on.
The Australian article is originally from yournewswire.com & reposted by australiannationalreview.com
Australian nurses and midwives who dare to speak out against the dangers of vaccinations on social media or in person will be prosecuted, the Australian government has warned, urging members of the public to report vaccine skeptics to the authorities.
Medical professional face a jail sentence of 10 years for expressing doubt about the effectiveness of vaccinations or urging further studies into vaccine safety. Opponents of the new law claim free speech and scientific integrity is under attack in Australia by a government that has been bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
“With no exceptions we expect all registered nurses, enrolled nurses and midwives to use the best available evidence in making practice decisions. This includes providing information to the public about public health issues,” Chair of the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Australia (NMBA) Dr. Lynette Cusack said in a statement.
The NMBA has called on Australians to report nurses or midwives promoting anti-vaccination – ‘anti-vaxxers’, as they’re known colloquially.
“The board will consider whether the nurse or midwife has breached their professional obligations and will treat these matters seriously,” the statement said.
“Any published anti-vaccination material and/or advice which is false, misleading or deceptive which is being distributed by a registered nurse, enrolled nurse or midwife (including via social media) may also constitute a summary offence under the National Law and could result in prosecution by AHPRA [Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency.]”
One of the strongest supporters of vaccination, Victoria’s Health Minister Jill Hennessy, has no time for parents who believe vaccine safety requires further study in order to ensure they are safe for our children.
Describing vaccine skeptics as “brain dead sheep“, the politician said:
“They are an organized movement, largely stemming from the United State of America that are hell bent on misleading parents that vaccinations are unsafe.
“That’s a dangerous message and one I’m going to continue to fight. Vaccinations save lives,” the minister concluded. READ MORE