With Queen Elizabeth II having passed on now, her legacy will continue of course, in her offspring. This is a Queen who has expressed throughout her lifetime, an allegiance to Jesus Christ. It is difficult however, to reconcile her words with her actions.
To begin, let’s start with the obvious and her response (or lack of) to her sons’ association with known pedophiles.
Andrew’s with Jeffrey Epstein and Charles’ with Jimmy Savile. These and similar variations of the same within her royal brood have known no bounds in recent years. Take the ‘carry ons’ for instance of the Prince widely considered to be her favourite son.
The Royal stance about that was made quite clear when Prince Andrew’s suitability for public office was questioned by Labour’s Justice spokesman in the House of Commons, following the publicity around Andrew’s unsuitable close associations. He was sharply warned by the Speaker that his references to royalty should be ‘very rare, very sparing and very respectful’. There you have it in a nutshell …no requirement to take responsibility. And no expectation that the public should speak up about the King’s new clothes (or lack of).
The royal response to the House of Commons misspeak? :
The Duke of York is thus driven to Windsor for his proud mother the Queen to invest him. The Queen makes him a Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order, the highest order in the monarch’s gift to bestow. She personally decides to accord him the insignia’s highest rank, KG, GCVO, CD, after which the two royals, mother and son, take tea.
SOURCE (Abbreviated transcript supplied)
There’s much more as we know … and we’ve not even touched on the saga that was Diana, or Charles’ carry on with Camilla whilst married to the former. The Queen’s response to Andrew’s behaviour is telling enough.
All that scandal aside there are other glaring anomalies with the Royals…
In spite of the Queen’s professed faith, what of the Biblical instruction, ‘thou shalt not kill’? This is yet another dark history concealed by the ‘royal facade’. Her investments in the arms trade.
Queen Elizabeth II and Her Investment in the Arms Trade
This is information the public seems quite unaware of, or perhaps they prefer to pretend it doesn’t exist … like the King’s new clothes.
Those investments are extensive, outlined in the doco featured below, and include the production of Depleted Uranium (DU) responsible for much human suffering, killing children and causing deformities in the unborn.
Investigative Journalist John Pilger writes that it was the British who invented the modern arms trade in 1860, a trade that is now run for and by governments. The innocent victims of these wars are of course citizens, in particular the children. During the war on Iraq he says, an estimated 50 children died each day as a result of the deliberate bombing of Iraq’s water, power and sewage systems. (Distant Voices, Pilger, p156). :
“‘The British are really rather good at making certain kinds of weapons,’ said Prince Charles at the Dubai arms fair, where he was promoting the British arms industry, as his family frequently does. He happened to be standing near an ‘anti-personnel’ weapon designed specifically to destroy, not objects, but as many people as possible. ‘It’s the hoary old chestnut,’ he said. ‘If we don’t sell them, someone else will'” (Hidden Agendas, Pilger, p 119).
Following is the history of Queen Elizabeth’s investments in the arms trade, from StoptheWarCoalition at Youtube. A transcript is included.
How Queen Elizabeth II profits from the arms trade
To the Queen’s advisers she must seem the ultimate insider trader as, thanks to her royal boxes, she’s ahead of the game. Having advanced knowledge of any country’s ups and downs is useful, as in racing, to those buying and selling.
On the Queen’s accession it was said that she was worth 300 million pounds. Now the royal nest egg’s said to be 17 billion. Her investments in BP & in Rio Tinto Zinc mean very simply, she profits from petrol and uranium, and her subjects get ill.
After the Queen had been the first to switch on nuclear power at Calder Hall in Cumbria in the 1950s the world’s first nuclear power station was followed by Sizewell B and the Queen was advised to invest in uranium. Not withstanding any greenwash, royal gamblers have few ethics, and despite a feigned concern, Royalty knows that arms are good investments, and since those with money like making more, they risk the earth’s transformation into a death star, through shells, and bombs and cruise missiles, all tipped with depleted uranium (DU), so they pierce more easily through the heavy armour and the fortifications of perceived enemies. Air, water and soil are contaminated when DU is used.
Dr Doug Rokke, the ex director of the Pentagon’s DU Project says there is no way to decontaminate an area hit with Uranium.
“We also know it happens forever, therefore when the army personally says that food and water will be contaminated and that it’s an indiscriminate killer, that makes the use of DU a crime against God and a crime against humanity”.
Dr Jay M. Gould: “A large part of the baby boomer generation have had their immune systems compromised at worst.”
Dr Jay Gould would reveal in his book The Enemy Within: The High Cost of Living Near Nuclear Reactors, the extent of royalty’s uranium investments, and their uranium wealth was hot-housed by an entrepreneur Tiny Rowland. Thanks to Tiny Rowland’s companies Lonrho and Rio Tinto. Tiny Rowland asset stripped half of Africa, and though this takeover bid for Harrods was called the unpleasant and unacceptable face of capitalism he was popular with the Royals and the mega rich.
“Tiny Rowland says he loves Africa because Africa has enriched him …he definitely loves it because it has enriched him.”
Dr Mathias Mpande, Deputy Minister of Mines, Zambia.
Interviewer to Rowland: “Anything that has been brought to light as a result of the Lonrho affair, do you find any of that in any way the unacceptable face of capitalism?”
“I can’t judge because this has not escalated into a political matter and I know so little about politics here that I just, I can’t comment.”
Never mind that Rowland was formerly Rowland Fuhrhop, an unashamed member of Hitler Youth. Princess Alexander’s husband, the Queen’s nephew, Angus Ogilvy, would sit on Rowland’s board with Royal approval.
The Royal shares would thus finance the army of Africa in Lonrho’s resource wars.
African leaders promised Lonrho that their strategic minerals were armed to the hilt by Ogilvy and Rowland. Tiny Rowland was nicknamed the Royals’ Buccaneer and how much he made them is unknown, but the condition of his African workforces were notorious, and so Africa fueled new spurts of Royal wealth.
The Anti-Slavery Society reported in 1987 that in Lonrho’s shanty goldmines 60 boys had to work almost naked in a pool of cyanide at Lonrho’s extractor plant in Ghana. The cyanide used in separating out the gold enters the body as gas, liquid or acid dust. The boys worked naked, since on Rowland’s orders this was company policy to reduce theft.
In 1973 Lonrho was the biggest plantation owner in Africa, controlling 98% of oil imports through its pipelines. It mined for example, 40% of Zimbabwe’s gold, and it was the largest agricultural producer, thus, thanks to their pet buccaneer, the Royal shareholders were re-colonizing Africa by the back door. And thus, thanks to Tiny Rowland’s advice their uranium holdings are now worth more than 6 billion dollars.
But just as England was wont to conquer others, as Shakespeare wrote, she has made a shameful conquest of herself. A uranium wind can now blow back into the faces of these profiteers with their poisons being impossible to decontaminate. Thanks to uranium investors, radioactive isotopes are now found in the flesh of worms. At a Ministry of Defense weapons range in Dumphries, DU has turned the worms mutant. Worms are a pillar of ecosystems through aerating the soil and aiding the nutrient uptake of plants whom Charles reputedly likes to talk to, though he may now need a geiger counter before addressing his radioactive trifids in Scotland. However, there’ll be no apology from the Palace for any carcinogenic carnage, since DU, hardening the tips of shells to pierce concrete is one of the Royal Ordinance’s star exports.
Despite the Royal Ordinance’s weapons that contain DU, such as those made at Fazakerley, Liverpool counting as poison gas weapons, violating the Geneva Convention under the 1925 Geneva Poison Gas Protocol. The DU shell, which the sovereign has shares in is a highly mobile indiscriminate killer. It’s described as a permanent terrain contaminant, which has a half life of 4.5 billion years. Unlike any hereditary monarchy however historic, DU stains the environment for ever and ever. Its half life has earned it the title of a silent killer. The silent killer that will never stop killing. And there’s nothing depleted about DU when you see the birth defects it causes … swollen heads, enlarged eyeballs, dysfunctional limbs, as DU rewrites DNA codes making them into nonsense.
“What this has generated is from 2004 up to this day we are seeing a rate of congenital malformations in the city of Fallujah that has surpassed even that in the aftermath of, in the wake of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that nuclear bombs were dropped on at the end of World War II”
Al Jazeera News.
While the British government was waging its illegal war in Iraq it increased the value of the Royal investment, for the price of uranium would rise 500% in six years.
Its radioactive death dance turns a royal profit.
(Here is an alternative video link at Bitchute.com).
This Royal preponderance with arms investments is surely concerning? It appears to have taken precedence back in the 1970s also when Great Britain under a pretext of lies, evicted two thousand or so Chagossians from their homeland of Diego Garcia, a British colony in the Indian Ocean, in order to grant the US their wish to obtain that people’s island (uninhabited) for a military base. They would use it later as a platform for bombing Iraq and Afghanistan.
Diego Garcia and the Chagossian People
The British had struck a deal with the US during the 1960s for the acquisition of the island. Deviously tricked into compliance and lied to by the official British representative living on the island, the Chagossian people were first terrorized and intimidated via the gassing of their pet dogs, then dumped on a cargo ship and transported wholesale to a nearby island, and left in an abandoned housing complex with no water or means of survival. Many died of sadness and suicide. Years later, when these displaced and original inhabitants of Diego Garcia won in the British High Court the right to return to their homeland … Queen Elizabeth exercised her Royal prerogative and declined them that right. (See here also). As Pilger points out in his doco, ‘dictators do this … but without the quaint ritual’, (as in how this prerogative plays out in a ritual at the Palace). This episode in British history is little known to mainstream readers. I first saw it in 2004, with the initial release of John Pilger’s documentary ‘Stealing a Nation’ a day or two before Christmas when everybody is too busy to pay attention, (peak viewing time if you want information to fly under the radar).
And so, as Great Britain moves on with their new (unelected) king in place, remember Charles is totally in sync with imposing the so called ‘Great Reset’ upon a world that never even asked for it. So much for professions of democracy.
The plan is now in plain sight, hitherto denied as the ramblings of conspiracy theorists. A plan that proposes you will owning nothing whilst they, true to form, will own (and enjoy) everything. The Queen herself knighted Klaus Schwab, one of Charles’ reset compatriots. Foreseeing current events, author Joan Veon dubbed Charles ‘The Sustainable Prince’.
Read below our recent article on topic…With Queen Elizabeth’s passing … and Charles now King, remember he is in full compliance with the WEF’s plans for a global reset aka one world government
STEALING A NATION BY JOHN PILGER https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NVfABu61D3w