Published on Sep 21, 2018
From the Public Intelligence Blog
Lloyds of London, one of the world’s premier insurance groups, is refusing to insure health claims made against 5G wireless (“wi-fi”) technologies.
How curious that Lloyds of London has excluded from their policies any negative health effects caused by wi-fi technologies. Now, WHY would Lloyds leave all that money on the table if these technologies are so safe? And, why are other insurance companies following Lloyds’ lead?
If you think that following-the-money provides insights, you’ll probably conclude that something VERY BIG is embedded in this decision.
Here’s some background (including links):
The FCC and other government regulatory bodies, in collusion with the big telecomm industries, are ferociously pushing smart meters, 5G and the Internet of Things.
This roll-out is not only happening in the US, but all over the world. The giant telecomms gush enthusiastically about how EVERYTHING will be connected
OMG!! We’re gonna have Incredibly high-speed connectivity so your little girls and teens can, at supersonic speed, upload pix of their latest nail-polish jobs or cute puppy videos to FaceBook, Pinterest, etc., etc., for their friends to gasp and giggle…..and, of course, click “like” and forward these to their friends…. again, all at warp speed.
It’s pretty clear that this whole “play” by the giant telecomms is seen by them as a financial windfall – for them. And, via their lobby groups, it’s seen as a windfall for all the politicians who support this agenda. Politicians will be rewarded in the usual manner – pricey junkets to exotic places, elegant dinners, campaign contributions and, of course, cushy “golden parachute” jobs for those wi-fi supportive ex-politicians within the telecomm industries, or within their lobby groups. In short, crony business as usual.
BUT WAIT!! ….There’s a tiny but growing wrinkle in this rosy scenario of sugar plums dancing in the heads of these telecomm leaders. Specifically, Lloyds of London, one of the world’s premier insurance groups, is refusing to insure health claims made against wireless technologies. And, other insurance companies are following Lloyd’s lead in this.
If you follow the money, this is HUGE. After all, if these wi-fi techno-toys are so safe, why is Lloyds leaving all this additional money on the table?
Well, Lloyd’s November 2010 Risk Assessment Team’s Report gives us a solid clue: the report compares these wireless technologies with asbestos, in that the early research on asbestos was “inconclusive” and only later did it become obvious to anyone paying attention that asbestos causes cancer.
Keep in mind that Lloyd’s Risk Assessment study of wi-fi was published over 8 years ago. Even back then, however, their Risk Assessment Team was smart enough to realize that new evidence just might emerge showing that the various wi-fi frequencies do cause illness. The result? Lloyds opted to exclude coverage for wi-fi related illnesses.
And then, PG&E followed close on, slipping in its own legal clauses (just as it was rolling out smart meters) that claim no liability for wi-fi related health damage. The schools who opt to put in wi-fi are responsible, according to PG&E, and any other organizations that opt to have PG&E put wi-fi in their buildings are the responsible parties
Today, MANY more recent peer-reviewed scientific studies show a range of serious damage caused by these wi-fi frequencies. 5G brings a quantum leap in damage – to DNA, to cell mitochondria, and much more.
Here is a look into the ‘wonders’ of 5G (yes you’ll be able to download stuff in mere seconds, the selling point for the less aware) … and how you are already being watched, set to ramp up in the evolving-in-plain-sight (not) smart cities. Facial recognition, car registration, social media, all keeping tabs on you. I visited Tauranga (NZ) last year, avoiding the new toll roads, as the freeways get bigger & busier, I was concerned (being your typical ‘country bumpkin’) about how to pay on them. My friend later informed me I wouldn’t need to. The cameras capture your rego & you’re billed in the mail. And sure, we all knew this capability with the speed cameras we’ve had operating for eons, but this brings the reality of it all to life. The seeming benign beginnings that morph into something none of us truly envisaged at the start. We’ve all been captured by stealth. In the name of security and safety. Ironic since ‘they’ have proven to have zero concern about our safety. I’ve been compiling a bit of info lately on the smart street lighting that will be hooked up apparently to 5G. The advanced versions we’re seeing in the dumb (not smart) city models feature cameras. A reader tells me there are camera versions in Palmy North apparently. So in 12 months (according to the time frame I’ve been hearing about) we will have 5G frying us all, as we rejoice over fast internet download? I’m also told there is already 5G (unofficially) in Wanaka & Invercargill. And yet, world wide, health professionals are expressing their deep concern over this tech that is harmful to humans (to everything) with no data offered us on research into safety. The awake people have already joined the dots on that one. They are rolling it out regardless anyway, no surprizes given they continually deny the damage done to us by the already present cell phone masts with their cancer clusters under them.
Have a listen to the video & I will post eventually on the associated street lamps that are appearing everywhere. They’ve just changed all the bulbs in my district (elsewhere also readers tell me) … they are way brighter. Other places (eg the UK) have recorded illnesses following. A reader has told me of illnesses following installation of theirs in Whanganui. Finally, remember also that the smart cities (everything smart) are related to so called ‘sustainable development’ (seen anything sustainable happening lately aside from developers’ bank balances? I certainly haven’t) which is pretty much Agenda 21/30. Check out also Agenda 21/30 in NZ.Google Agenda 21 these days & you’ll get the ‘sustainable’ mantra.
Here are some links for wider info (Barry Trower a must watch) :
TOP 20 FACTS ON 5G: WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT 5G WIRELESS AND “SMALL” CELLS
WARNING – “THERE ARE NO SAFETY CHECKS CARRIED OUT ON 5G” – BARRY TROWER EX MILITARY WHISTLE BLOWER
Follow the links below the video also for more information & references cited.
Published on Dec 29, 2018
Photo: Screenshot from the video
Note, I and some of our readers have been watching these lamps here in NZ. They came & changed all the bulbs very recently in the Horowhenua, and I heard Whanganui as well. Have heard reports of kids being ill following that in Whanganui at least. I have heard also that some of them have cameras. These are lamps featured in the smart city (agenda 21) models & will link to the incoming 5G. Supposed to assist with traffic flow, parking etc among other things. That’s the ostensible rationale for their existence. Locally, feedback suggests it is control of dimming & brightening the lights. They are certainly now way brighter. Watch out for them in your neighbourhood.
Radiation given off by state-of-the-art street lamps is wreaking havoc on the residents of Gateshead, according to local Mark Steele.
He said people living in the area are experiencing symptoms of insomnia, nose bleeds and several women have even endured the horror of stillbirths since the introduction of LED lamps that he believes emit 5G radiation.
In his circle alone, Mr Steele, 58, is aware of three women have lost their children since the lights were installed in September 2016, with one giving birth to a deformed child that survived just three hours.
Mr Steele, who was part of the IEEE, which claims to be ‘the world’s largest technical professional organisation dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity’, said: ‘We are seeing babies dying in the womb as these transmitters are situated outside people’s bedroom windows. It’s a humanitarian crisis.’
Earlier this week Gateshead council put out a Facebook post encouraging people to ignore ‘conspiracy theories’ about the dangers of 5G radiation, adding ‘there is no scientific basis or credible evidence for any of these scare stories’.
In a Facebook post yesterday, Gateshead Council dismissed concerns over the borough’s street lights as ‘entirely false conspiracy theories’ with ‘no scientific basis or credible evidence’
According to Professor Ulrich Warnke, from the University of Saarland, EMF radiation, which is given out by light transmitters, causes disruption to the body’s nitrogen monoxide system, which keeps cells healthy and controls gene expression.
The European Academy for Environmental Medicine (EUROPAEM) – EMF working group notes such radiation has been linked to cancer, insomnia and mental-health disorders.
UK telecoms regulator Ofcom reportedly plans to launch 5G services, such as lamps and cell towers, throughout Britain by 2020. There are rumours Gateshead is taking part in a ‘secret Government trial’ by rolling out the technology in the borough before then.
‘Such miscarriages didn’t occur before the lamps appeared’
Mr Steele said: ‘We’ve got people bleeding from the nose in my locality.
‘We’ve got people who can’t sleep from neurological disorders.
‘What about the poor women across Gatehead who are losing babies at nearly full term?
‘What about the children who will develop cancer from this 5G roll out?’
‘Microwave radiation increases miscarriages. These didn’t occur before the lamps appeared.’
Mr Steele claims EMF’s damaging effects are evident in the loss of wildlife from his local area.
While driving around Gateshead, which Mr Steele claims has more than 37,000 EMF-emitting lamps, he said: ‘[There are] no small birds in [the] surrounding trees.
‘The sparrows have been annihilated; they’ve wiped out the flying insects.’
Gateshead Council denies ‘completely false’ claims
In a Facebook post, which has been shared more than 1,200 times, Gateshead Council announced yesterday: ‘Street lights will not induce miscarriages in pregnant women, or cause insomnia, or nosebleeds, and they are not killing all the birds and insects.’
The post adds the borough is not taking part in ‘secret Government trials’ before 5G is rolled out nationwide.
It adds the council has been advised by Public Health England, which reviewed guidance issued by bodies including the World Health Organization, and confirmed the technology carries no health risks.
The post urges people share the statement with those ‘badly frightened’ by the claims and ends with ‘the more people who understand that they are completely false, the better’.
Despite Gateshead council’s claim that they are not using 5G, Mr Steele said: ‘The transmitter operates at 868 – 870 MHz. That is a specific 5G spectrum.
‘The increase in transmitters even if they did operate at 2G – 3G, as the council have stated, would make them 5G’.
Does science support EMF’s risks?
Previous studies have linked such radiation to ‘internal stress’, which may lead to genetic damage that can cause expectant mothers to miscarry.
Those exposed to the highest levels of EMF radiation are 48 per cent more likely to lose their baby than women exposed to the lowest amounts, according to a 2017 study by the Kaiser Permanente Division of Research in Oakland.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends MF radiation, to which everyone is exposed to to some extent, be studied for its effect on pregnancies.
The WHO classifies EMF as a ‘possible human carcinogen’ but does not consider electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) a condition. EHS is a claimed sensitivity to EMF, leading to headache, fatigue and stress.
Commenting on the matter, The Parliamentary Assembly from the Council of Europe, said: ‘Waiting for high levels of scientific and clinical proof before taking action to prevent well-known risks can lead to very high health and economic costs, as was the case with asbestos, leaded petrol and tobacco.’
What is being done about it?
Researchers from a network known as EMF Scientists, which includes doctors from the University of Columbia, are appealing to the UN to encourage the WHO to develop stricter EMF guidelines, while also educating the public on the risks.
In January 2015, the French parliament adopted a comprehensive law that protects the general public from excessive exposure to electromagnetic waves.
Among other things, the legislation has banned Wi-Fi in nurseries for children under three years old. It also requires primary schools teaching children under 11 to only turn Wi-Fi on when it is being used for specific lessons.
As of February 2016, 220 scientists from 42 countries have signed an international Appeal, directed to the UN and WHO, calling for protection from EMF exposure.
According to EUROPAEM, the only treatment for EMF-related illnesses is to eliminate or reduce the radiation source.