This first article is from 2009 … and look how ‘far’ we’ve come (sunk?) … these guys (Gates & similar ilk) met at “an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy.” Philanthropy for themselves. For some mysterious reason (not) the wealthy 1% seem to think the rest of us should depart & give them free reign. So recently that ugly plan (as at Nov 2019) is beginning to emerge in all it’s sparkling clarity. Interestingly (or not so?) from the Wall Street Journal. The fraternity of the literally filthy rich. EWR
Last week’s meeting of the Great and the Good (or the Richest and Richer) was bound to draw criticism. The New York meeting of billionaires Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, David Rockefeller, Eli Broad, George Soros, Ted Turner, Oprah, Michael Bloomberg and others was described by the Chronicle of Philanthropy as an informal gathering aimed at encouraging philanthropy. Just a few billionaires getting together for drinks and dinner and a friendly chat about how to promote charitable giving.
There was no agenda, we were told. And no plan for a follow-up meeting.
But in an age of fallen wealth idols, it was inevitable that a meeting of billionaire minds would draw scrutiny. Surely all that money and power in one room had to spell trouble for the rest of us.
An article in the Times of London, headlined “Billionaire Club in Bid to Curb World Population,” said the issues discussed in the top-secret meeting included health care, education and–by far the most controversial–slowing the global population growth.
Now fast forward to 2019
Bernie Sanders announces support for global eugenics and depopulation, calls on accelerating abortions in countries populated by people of color
(Natural News) In a bizarre, almost surreal CNN town hall event that repeatedly claimed hurricanes are all man-made, Democrat presidential candidate Bernie Sanders called for a global-scale eugenics program to reduce human population by accelerating abortions in countries populated by people of color.
Advocacy for all this came from Sanders’ response to a pre-screened question from an audience member named Martha Readyoff, “a teacher from New Milford, Connecticut.” Her question is heavily peppered with presuppositions, such as claiming abortion is “empowering women.” The question was obviously intended to push Sanders toward a more radical left-wing position, and he took the bait. Here’s her question (h/t to Newsbusters.org for the transcripts):
Good evening. Human population growth has more than doubled in the past 50 years. The planet cannot sustain this growth. I realize this is a poisonous topic for politicians, but it’s crucial to face. Empowering women and educating everyone on the need to curb population growth seems a reasonable campaign to enact. Would you be courageous enough to discuss this issue and make it a key feature in a plan to address climate catastrophe?
Just a shortish post here on a topic that’s been raised by one or two folk over the four years or is it five since I’ve been blogging & posting. The gentle & sometimes blunt reminder to me why not post some good news? Well bright eyed & bushy tailed I originally used to add in the good news on for instance growing your own organic veg (see the garden pages at the main menu), and the health successes with cancer cures and so on. Thing is now with the latter, we are being censored on those items. The Fact Checker liars jump in with their coercive little messages as they have on my Rangitikei FB page. And as we know they’ve recently announced they censor the urls so they never get to you. A link given me this morning by a reader Rose has been altered I see so it leads you to the opposite info as what was being pointed to (ie mainstream vax info). Just a thought about how hard it is becoming to add good news. But still, I revert to my point about the point of this blog… ie to highlight the lies & expose them.
So, regarding that logo if you like for this page (‘exposing lies’) … it’s hard to turn that into good news except for instance when the likes of Monsanto gets nailed. Another thought, and this is how I largely see this. I would not expect my blog to be a one stop shop for the news. I myself keep my mind always attuned to good news elsewhere. So please do, those who find too much of the bad news difficult to swallow, find yourself other sources of good news & read those regularly to keep a healthy balance. I totally concur it is not good to focus on bad news 24/7.
Nevertheless, all that said, I will keep in mind the advice & endeavor to add again some pieces of good news as I used to more back in the day.
And thanks to all of those who do follow, read and give me occasional much valued links, comments & feedback. Also those who occasionally correct some item or other that needed tweaking.
Also, folk will have noted I’m sure that I’ve chosen not to entertain slagging matches or long debates on the mainstream versus censored truth. This is a venue for the latter so I see no point in allowing people to air here what they can at mainstream no problem. Try & post censored truth on mainstream though & see how you fare? You’ll get the chop & always they will slant to their mainstream propaganda. After all, mainstream news/journalism is bought & paid for. Whore media largely. The long arm of the corporates. So yes, the likes of Dave Hansford of 1080 renown & others … well I have just waved them on I’m afraid. Let’s keep the focus on exposing lies, not giving the liars a forum.
Finally, another growing concern particularly on social media & other forums is the undermining of old trusted avenues of info. Respected writers from way back are now being described as liars. There may be some of those who are genuine exposures, but most are clearly cover ups of the truth they bring. To research each and every one of those is very time consuming and with the ‘fact checkers’ working overtime these days with their Soros funding behind them, it is difficult to keep abreast. Therefore there are some issues I just don’t go near. Time is of the essence & one has to focus & draw the line somewhere. So do research them thoroughly for yourself.
Oh how the corporations care about you & your babies. Not! …
Johnson & Johnson has long been the undisputed leader in baby product sales and has always tried to portray itself as a gentle, caring company. But a startling new report by Reuters suggests otherwise. The report indicates that small amounts of asbestos have been lurking in some of the company’s talc — the substance that makes baby powder powdery — going back to the 1970s. The company allegedly didn’t openly communicate results, and at times purposely obfuscated them, to both consumers and the Food and Drug Administration.
The information Reuters examined came to light this past summer. Johnson & Johnson was sued by 22 women who claimed the company’s baby powder caused their ovarian cancer, resulting in a $4.7 billion verdict against the company. As a result, old company documents revealing the deception were made public. On Friday, this news tanked the company’s stock, which dropped 11 percent.
This is just the latest in a string of bad news for the company, which has already been battling lawsuits and terrible PR. In recent years, Johnson & Johnson faced some backlash after it was discovered that its iconic golden baby shampoo contained formaldehyde-releasing ingredients. The company removed those chemicals (although they’re probably safe in the amount present in personal care products) and even recently overhauled its entire baby range to compete with smaller brands that have embraced so-called “clean” ingredients.
Most recently, it’s been battling lawsuit after lawsuit alleging that talc use caused plaintiffs’ cancers. Notably, some evidence from a 2016 lawsuit suggested that in the early ’90s, the company targeted black and Hispanic women, who already used the powder in the genital area in higher numbers than white women, for “more aggressive marketing.” There are another 11,700 plaintiffs lined up for cases against J&J, all related to talc.
J&J has vehemently denied that its talc contained asbestos throughout these suits. The link between ovarian cancer and talc is not conclusive, and it’s still not clear that the tiny amounts of asbestos reported in J&J’s past testing were capable of causing the cancers in the past and current lawsuits. But what’s not in dispute is that asbestos is indeed a well-established carcinogen.
The negative publicity from the high legal payouts and Reuters’s seemingly damning evidence of sneaky behavior from the company in the past has brought the issue of hygiene product safety and consumer trust to the forefront. The FDA has very little regulatory power over hygiene products and cosmetics. But this news, which comes at a time when consumer demand is putting a lot of pressure on legislators, may finally mean that laws change.
Baby powder and asbestos
Talc is a natural mineral that is mined from the earth. It’s not totally certain that talc, and its end product talcum powder, is safe even in its purest form. In some cases, it can also be contaminated with asbestos. Asbestos — a category of fibrous minerals known to cause cancer — often shows up in the same mines where talc is, causing contamination.
Health organizations globally recognize asbestos as a carcinogen, causing cancers like mesothelioma and ovarian cancer, especially among people like miners, construction workers, and factory employees who have been exposed to it in large quantities. It gets fuzzier when trying to determine exactly how much exposure is required to actually cause cancer; no one knows how little is enough to set off the very complex chain of events that lead to the disease.
The Reuters report indicates that it’s probably “impossible” to completely purify mined talc and definitely impossible to test for asbestos thoroughly and conclusively in all commercial batches. This all adds up to a recipe for consumer concern — and lawsuits.
The Reuters article, by Lisa Girion, focuses heavily on reports and testing that J&J did in the 1970s on both its baby powder and its Shower to Shower product that was marketed to adults. It weaves a tale of how the company appears to have misled consumers and even the FDA after scientists figured out that asbestos was harmful and that it was showing up in talc samples. The FDA at one point in the ’70s was determining whether and how to regulate it. Girion writes:
J&J didn’t tell the FDA about a 1974 test by a professor at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire that turned up asbestos in talc from J&J. … Nor did the company tell the FDA about a 1975 report from its longtime lab that found particles identified as “asbestos fibers” in five of 17 samples of talc from the chief source mine for Baby Powder. “Some of them seem rather high,” the private lab wrote in its cover letter.
A comprehensive in depth coverage of this UN Agenda that’s been consigned by many to the conspiracy basket. If you hear ‘conspiracy’ if nothing else research it for yourself because this term is the convenient cover up go-to. This site is very well documented. I’ve not cited their articles mainly because it is difficult to link to specific articles. EWR
United Nations, John Key’s New Zealand Cycle Way And Fascist Globalist Government In New Zealand – Agenda 21
“The vast majority of New Zealanders and the world in general are so distracted by day to day busy-ness, reality television and sports that most are oblivious to the socialism creeping in at the local level through Agenda 21.
|“Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.
This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level. ”
New Zealanders need to know that although the information presented and documents revealed are mostly originating from the United States, this is a GLOBAL plan that is already starting to be implemented here in NZ. Hamilton City has been chosen as an experimental model city for the Agenda 21 program. RushFM.com
Photo Credit: pixabay.com (with wording added)
From Amazing Polly at Youtube …. “I expose the con games & sales pitches that the billionaires use to entice us into building SMART Cities & share inspiration from Taipei where the people are rejecting the SMART grid system. Also, I show you an odd similarity between SMART Cities and the “Hameau” — specially designed, fully functioning villages that were installed on the estates of the elites in France in the run up to the French Revolution.”
Alan Jones and Peta Credlin expose the lies being promoted by the by the IPCC. Former IPCC Chair for the Sea Level committee Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner opens up too Alan Jones and completely spills the beans on how the world is being lied to by the UN and the climate change activists. Solar activity is currently the key contributor to any climate variation. Copyright © Jones & Co, SkyNews, 2GB
A sub 5 minute educational video about the events surrounding 9/11. How 19 men armed with box cutters and directed by a man on dialysis in a cave fortress halfway around the world, launched the most sophisticated attack in history, against the most heavily defended nation on the planet.
Published on Apr 13, 2012
Good old mainstream at it again. Banging on the climate drum. They’re clutching at straws again and you can rely on the public to swallow it hook line and sinker. A couple of weeks back it was causing low IQ, now it’s all woven in with under-nutrition & obesity. And who can afford wholesome food these days? They talk of returning to indigenous values which is a bit rich since they’ve done nothing but ignore &/or destroy those from the get go. Nevertheless ‘we somehow have to keep this climate change thing rolling’.
Read article at the link: