Tag Archives: Influenza

Flu shots have now killed 3 in South Korea

via markcrispinmiller.com

By MCM Post date October 20, 2020

On the second death:
https://koreajoongangdaily.joins.com/2020/10/20/national/socialAffairs/vaccine-flu-shot-influenza/20201020185100376.html?detailWord=

Article link: https://www.koreatimes.co.kr/www/nation/2020/10/113_297916.html

The Correlation Coefficient between COVID-19 Deaths and Influenza Vaccinations: The Numbers Don’t Lie

From qplusnews.com

Thanks to Hilary Butler for this link.

The correlation between COVID-19 deaths per million of population and 65+ year olds that have received influenza vaccines is real. Dr. Allan S. Cunningham presented the challenge and here are the results.

https://www.bmj.com/content/369/bmj.m1932/rr-15

One source for vaccine data: OECD (2020), Influenza vaccination rates (indicator) doi:10.1787/e452582-e (Accessed on 21 May 2020). This lists, by country, the % of the population aged 65+ for 2018 or the latest available year. For Covid-19 death rates by country as of 21 May 2020: www.worldometers.info/coronavirus.

% INFLUENZA VACCINATIONS IN THE ELDERLY (x) /COVID-19 DEATH RATES PER MILLION (y)
Czech Republic 20.3/28 Lithuania 13.4/22
Denmark 52.0/97 Luxembourg 37.6/174
Estonia 4.8/48 Netherlands 64.0/337
Finland 48.4/55 Norway 34.4/43
France 49.7/431 Portugal 60.8/125
Germany 34.8/99 Slovak Republic 13.0/5
Hungary 26.8/49 Slovenia 11.8/51
Ireland 57.6/319 Spain 53.7/596
Italy 52.7/535 Sweden 49.4/384
Latvia 7.7/12 United Kingdom 72.6/531

The x and y values shown above were used to determine the Correlation Coefficient (link for calculator below) between the two.

https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/pearson/default2.aspx

READ MORE AT THE LINK

http://qplusnews.com/the-correlation-coefficient-between-covid-19-deaths-and-influenza-vaccinations-the-numbers-dont-lie?fbclid=IwAR045T68fH7Dg94yaCRfWigdTAWlIJPVOhhqNM50rB9KelCluXui-KWaB3U

Fauci now holds—and two Stanford researchers agree with him—that COVID-19 may not be so dangerous after all (2)

Fauci now holds – and two Stanford researchers agree with him – that COVID-19 may not be so dangerous after all

  • The Facts:Dr. Anthony Fauci was one of three authors in a paper recently published in the New England Medical Journal claiming that “the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza.”
  • Reflect On:Is it better to be safe than sorry? Or is there something else going on here? If we don’t take the same shutdown measures for other viruses and diseases that may be just as or more dangerous, why are we doing it for COVID19?

READ MORE

http://markcrispinmiller.com/2020/03/fauci-now-holds-and-two-stanford-researchers-agree-with-him-that-covid-19-may-not-be-so-dangerous-after-all-2/

 

Image by Jan Mateboer from Pixabay

 

Removing Children’s Tonsils and Adenoids Increases Risk for 28 Diseases, Study Finds

Posted on:

Saturday, July 7th 2018 at 2:30 pm

Written By:

Sayer Ji, Founder

While the conventional medical establishment calls for the removal of “broken” or “defective” body parts, a watershed study on the long-term effects of tonsillectomy and adenoid removal calls into question the propriety of this surgery, performed on nearly half-a-million children in the United States each year

If you were a child born in the U.S. from the 1950s through the 1970s, odds are high that either you or someone you know has undergone a tonsillectomy or adenoidectomy. I was one of those children. When I was in kindergarden, I had my adenoids removed. I was already suffering from severe bronchial asthma, requiring emergency treatment at the hospital several times a year, and somtimes as often as three times a month. The adenoid surgery was performed ostensibly to ‘relieve’ sinus obstruction. But following the procedure, my symptoms worsened. By the time I was sixteen I needed another sinus obstruction surgery, this time for sinus polyps and a deviated septum.

READ MORE

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/removing-childrens-tonsils-and-adenoids-increases-risk-28-diseases-study-finds

GreenMedInfo LLC. This work is reproduced and distributed with the permission of GreenMedInfo LLC. Want to learn more from GreenMedInfo? Sign up for the newsletter here http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/newsletter.

Photo: greenmedinfo

Bayer and Death: 1918 and Aspirin

From foodfreedom.wordpress.com

“Farbenfabriken Bayer’s worldwide efforts had left few places lacking aspirin. In the United States, Bayer’s giant factory produced aspirin under “American” management. After Bayer executives were charged with violating the Trading with the Enemies Act in August 1918, advertisements encouraged confidence in aspirin.” Karen Starko

The world has believed for almost a century that a new and virulent virus came out of nowhere worldwide and killed millions in 1918.  Two reports, one published in 2008 and the second in 2009, lay that myth to rest for good.

via Bayer and Death: 1918 and Aspirin

A research team identifies unknown contaminants in all but one of 30 human & veterinary vaccines

From thecontrail.com

WARNING about vaccines: Sophisticated new method of analysis reveal extensive contamination

The study was conducted by a husband and wife research team, Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. Antonietta Gatti, a selected expert of the World Health Organization (WHO) for the safety of nanotechnological food, is a member of the National Council of Research of Italy and the scientific director of Nanodiagnostics.

Using electron-microscopy, the researchers examined 44 samples of 30 different human and veterinary vaccines, including those for influenza, meningitis, allergies, cervical cancer and hepatitis.

And what they found was disturbing. The pair identified contaminants in all tested vaccines – but for one. (The lone vaccine to test free of inorganic contaminants was Feligen, produced for use on cats).
When it comes to vaccine safety, humans didn’t fare as well.

In the study, published in 2017 in International Journal of Vaccines and Vaccinations, the researchers reported that they found both single particles and aggregates – or assemblages – of a variety of bizarre and toxic substances in the vaccines.

Researchers “baffled” by the composition of the contaminants

The researchers described the contaminants as “micro- and nano-sized particulate matter composed of inorganic elements not declared in the products’ ingredients lists.”

https://thecontrail.com/forum/topics/bombshell-all-tested-vaccines-reveal-toxic-substances-linked-to-a

CDC’s Own Data: Vaccine-Infant Death Link

All in their own data!  They’re purporting to protect your infant. Still trust these people?

Thanks to the contrail.com for this link from greenmedinfo.com

The CDC’s own research has found that the long denied vaccine-SIDS link is real.

If you believe the official pronouncements of top governmental health agencies like the CDC and FDA, all the vaccines in the present day schedule are a priori safe and effective.

Not only are you told that they can’t harm you, but that not taking them can kill you.

Parents are under even more pressure. They are told that refraining from vaccinating their infants or children will greatly increase their risk of dying or being disabled. Worse, they are increasingly labeled as ‘crazy’ and ‘irresponsible’ anti-vaccine zealots who are putting the lives of others in danger.

But what happens when the actual evidence from the scientific and clinical literature produced by these very agencies contradicts their own vaccine policies?

This is exactly what has happened with the publication of a new study in the Journal of Pediatrics titled ,”Adverse Events following Haemophilus influenzae Type b Vaccines in the Vaccine Adverse Event ReportingSystem, 1990-2013,” wherein CDC and FDA researchers identify 749 deaths linked to the administration of the Hib vaccine, 51% of which were sudden infant death linked to the administration of Hib vaccine.

The CDC has boldly denied that there is any evidence supporting a causal link between vaccines and infant death, despite the fact that their own webpage on the topic acknowledges that “From 2 to 4 months old, babies begin their primary course of vaccinations. This is also the peak age for sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS).” Written off as coincidence, the CDC suggests that stomach sleeping is the primary modifiable risk factor.

Because SIDS is the 3rd leading cause of death in infants, and because the U.S. has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the developed world, one would think that more progress would have been made toward understanding its causes. Perhaps, as explored in this past article, the signal of harm is being ignored. Neglect and suppression of available data has recently been exposed with the confession of a top CDC vaccine scientist who was compelled to covered up data revealing an autism-MMR link in African-American boys.

READ MORE

http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdcs-own-data-vaccine-infant-death-link

 

Flu vaccine tested for heavy metals reveals 25,000 times higher mercury level than EPA limit for water

From NaturalNews

“Mercury tests conducted on vaccines at the Natural News Forensic Food Lab have revealed a shockingly high level of toxic mercury in an influenza vaccine (flu shot) made by GlaxoSmithKline (lot #9H2GX). Tests conducted via ICP-MS document mercury in the Flulaval vaccine at a shocking 51 parts per million, or over 25,000 times higher than the maximum contaminant level of inorganic mercury in drinking water set by the EPA.(1)

The tests were conducted via ICP-MS using a 4-point mercury calibration curve for accuracy. Even then, the extremely high level of mercury found in this flu shot was higher than anything we’ve ever tested, including tuna and ocean fish which are known for high mercury contamination. In fact, the concentration of mercury found in this GSK flu shot was 100 times higher than the highest level of mercury we’ve ever tested in contaminated fish. And yet vaccines are injected directly into the body, making them many times more toxic than anything ingested orally…”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/045418_flu_shots_influenza_vaccines_mercury.html#ixzz3tDTIfxKv

Comment:

Note well, the product insert states it’s never been subjected to scientific clinical trials! So YOU the public are the guinea pigs. We have to be asking ourselves, what is wrong with this picture? And if the creators of these vaccines are so interested in our health and well being, why do their wares contain dangerous levels of mercury? Please do the research and figure this out. Vaccines are not what we are accustomed to believe. A good starting point is Dr Tenpenny’s research.

EnvirowatchRangitikei