Tag Archives: Human Rights

Open Letter to the Prime Minister of New Zealand: Our Freedom Is Essential

From betheresistancenz.com

Updated: Sep 5

Originally published August 23rd 2021 by Off the Beaten Path

Off the Beaten Path is currently experiencing censorship on our website. Be sure to stay in touch with the news that matters by subscribing. If we disappear join us at Telegram. It’s free.

It is time for New Zealanders to put their Government on notice. No one is taking our freedom away.

Dear Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Minister of Health, Minister of Covid, Minister or Seniors, Director General of Health,

We have heard a lot from you and your Ministers about the importance of public health. However, what we have witnessed over the past year seems to have less to do with health and more to do with control.

While we are not experts on Covid, we are experts on us, and what it takes for us to thrive and exist in a meaningful productive way in this great, free country of ours.

In the face of a new seasonal flu like SARS-2, most Kiwis are pretty good at increasing their intake of Vitamin C, Vitamin D and Zinc. We tend to get plenty of exercise out in the fresh air, and lots of sunshine hours. If we do catch the flu, we stay at home and rest until we’re better. We ensure our diets are filled with good quality fruit and vegetables (preferably organic) and ideally plenty of home grown, grass fed red meat. A healthy immune system is, of course, the foundation for good health.

And every year, the clear majority of us survive whatever coronavirus comes our way.

On the subject of good health, the Ministry of Health will no doubt be aware of the numerous peer-reviewed studies and papers written and readily available online, which show very clearly that there already exists a number of immune therapy treatments for SARS-2 – such as Ivermectin.

At the time of writing, there have been 63 studies conducted on 26,422 Covid patients showing an 86% improvement for early treatment and prophylaxis. A new study has just come out of India showing Ivermectin obliterated 97% of Delhi cases.

Ivermectin is a safe, cheap, readily available, approved anti-viral therapeutic which has been used successfully for years to treat RNA viruses. Ivermectin continues to be shown to be a stand out success in the ‘fight against Covid’ and so one imagines if good health was indeed the driving focus of this Government, you would seize upon something like Ivermectin. And yet you did not. Why not?

The only remedy that this Government has ever pushed, from day one, was an experimental gene therapy rapidly rolled out by Big Pharma. So rapidly that these therapies will not even complete their trial phases for another two years.

Of huge concern to all of us is that your commitment to Pfizer has been to agree to offer up your own citizens as the human trial population, while at the same time freeing them from any liability from vaccine injury or death.

Which brings us to the death count from the experimental ‘vaccines’.

In New Zealand, as at 7 August 2021, Medsafe reported 26 deaths and 9155 adverse reactions, (up a staggering 50% in just one week). Of much interest however is that NZDSOS (New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science) now confirm through their own reporting at the coalface, that the fatality rate is currently 117 vaccine deaths and at least another 100 severely injured (heart attack, strokes, blood clots etc). Though that number is now likely to be much higher.

So, fhe fatality rate ascribed to Covid in New Zealand thus far has been 26. And yet, NZDSOS are now reporting that the death rate from the vaccine is more than FIVE TIMES this figure.

Prime Minister, we locked down an entire country for 26 deaths. In light of 117 vaccine deaths, why on earth are you not shutting down this vaccine rollout immediately?

To provide further context, you will also be aware that in any given year we lose around 500 New Zealanders to the seasonal winter flu. In fact, by comparison to the seasonal flu, SARS-2 is a very close cousin in that it’s a single strand RNA virus which affects the respiratory tract. We live with the flu and we get on with our lives.

Of significant interest is that worldwide in respect of SARS-2, studies show that the global infection to fatality (IFR) rate is less than 0.15%. And yet, the World Health Organization (W.H.O.) saw fit to declare a pandemic? On what basis? By what standard?

The W.H.O. also know now that there are serious issues with the veracity of the PCR kit. In fact, Kary Mullis, the late Nobel Peace Prize winner and inventor of the PCR himself, had always impressed that the kit was never intended to be used for the purpose of diagnosis. And yet you continue to use this as a diagnostic tool when it is known to also identify other lingering similar coronaviruses in the DNA left over from previous colds and flu’s which the individual may have long since recovered from. To further compound this pickle of a problem is this statistic: PCR produces as many as 95% false positives when used.

Prime Minister, please advise what your methodology is for determining whether a ‘case’ is actually a case. Science and common sense would suggest that the only true and accurate way to determine a patient is presenting an illness is through a physical examination to identify what their symptoms are. Your suggestion that an ‘asymptomatic’ person can be a ‘case’ not only flies in the face of decades of practiced medical science, but is a misleading lie of the most grotesque kind.

Another question then for you Prime Minister. Just how many of the recent ‘Auckland outbreak’ ‘cases’ that have plunged this country back into house arrest, are actually false positives? If we know PCR cannot be used to confirm a case, doesn’t this suggest your Government has a huge problem of credibility on its hands?

Or could it be that this pandemic was never about the virus? Could it be that the real agenda is something darker, more sinister?

Let’s look at the measures your Government has introduced to so-call ‘flatten the curve’ of this ‘dangerous virus’.

It began last year with the lockdowns. Confining New Zealanders to house arrest for weeks at a time. Forbidding family members from seeing each other, hugging each other, holding our elderly mother’s hand as she passed away. We were made to queue for food, made to stay 2 metres apart so we didn’t ‘infect each other’, forced to ‘mask up’, hide our smiles and breath in air our body was trying to expunge. Businesses were closed down, the ability to earn an income gone, stress levels were through the roof, violence and suicides rates up. We were prohibited from using playgrounds, swimming pools, going to the beach, hunting and camping.

The next phase was the surveillance. You called it ‘contact tracing’ which made it feel less innocuous. You suggested it was a good idea to ‘sign in’ everywhere we went so that when a new ‘case’ was ‘identified’, you could quickly stamp it out. This quickly instilled fear into our population with sadly, people beginning to view each other with growing scepticism.

You have now made this surveillance ‘mandatory’. No doubt for the good of ‘the team of five million’.

Simultaneously you siphoned off travellers and those ‘infected cases’ into purpose built facilities to isolate them from the rest of the population. You have spoken of the use of ankle bracelets as a means to ‘allowing us’ to return to open borders. Have you actually lost your mind!?

We are now in the throws of a ‘vaccine rollout’ or the ramping up of the New Zealand trials. You celebrated yesterday the milestone that a million of us have ‘got the jab’. A couple of questions for you Prime Minister, we are curious to know when the forced vaccinations will begin. Does the idea of injecting healthy people with a dangerous drug sit well with you? Does the knowledge that these vaccines are killing more people than Covid by the day concern you? If not, perhaps lockdown might just be the perfect time to reaquaint yourself with the Nuremberg Code. And trials.

Which brings us to the vaccine passports. Your view has clearly changed from a year ago when you assured us unvaccinated people would not be punished. That doesn’t seem to be the case anymore, does it. Prime Minister, are you now telling us that there will be fellow Kiwis, neighbours, work colleagues, members of our own families who will no longer be able to enter a place of worship, a cafe or restaurant, gym, garden centre, school, in fact any place of business – or enjoy a well deserved holiday abroad, unless they can ‘show their papers’. We all know what that smells like … Comrade.

Your fear-based propaganda has been hugely effective in pitting Kiwis against Kiwis. Those who live in fear vs those who choose not to. Those who believe you vs those who do not. Reminiscent of the horrors of Nazi Germany, and I might add, just as profoundly horrifying in its outcome, particularly when one observes the increasing practice (encouraged by you) of neighbours righteously dobbing in neighbours. No wonder people are asking ‘are the unvaccinated the new Jews?’

And speaking of the Holocaust, is it too soon to mention the ‘camps’ (sorry ‘Centres for National Resilience’?) Or is that just an Australian thing?

So, fast forward a year and here we are in another nationwide lockdown. But this time there is a noticeable change. Instead of fear, we are seeing resistance. We see it in the small business owners and farmers who have had their lives and livelihoods decimated. We see it in the mothers of children who are now being told their kids no longer need parental consent to get the jab. We see it in the healthcare workers in rest homes up and down the country forced to stay silent when the jab kills another patient, or run the risk of losing their job. And we see it in the eyes of thinking individuals who, having done their own research to verify verify verify the now overwhelming facts, data, studies and evidence provided by the many, many brave and principled medical doctors and scientific experts, are no longer satisfied that you, their Government have their best interests at heart.

Could it be that the team of five million is starting to wake up to the real agenda?

Or could it be as simple as the fact that your average, hard working Kiwi, having done his sums, has decided that a 99% recovery rate from a seasonal flu does not a pandemic make. That vaccinating and quarantining healthy, happy, productive Kiwis just Does. Not. Make. Sense.

Prime Minister, you are hereby on notice. We. The. People. regard our freedoms as essential and non-negotiable. We will not stand by as you illegally, immorally and unethically remove (temporarily or permanently) what is left of our freedoms, our rights, our property and our self-reliance.

In case you have forgotten, might we remind you that the proper role of Government is to serve The People and to protect us from those who would initiate force. Not to be the ones to subject us to said force.

Prime Minister, we call time on your so-called ‘pandemic’. We will not stand by while you destroy this beautiful country of ours, and the Kiwis that live here and choose to call it home. We do not subscribe to your fear-mongering and we most certainly do not subscribe to your diabolical, draconian unnecessary use of force.

Your type of government is called tyranny, and must not and will not be tolerated.

History has taught us that lesson.

Yours faithfully,

The Team of Five Million

READ AT THE LINK

https://www.betheresistancenz.com/post/open-letter-to-the-prime-minister-of-new-zealand-our-freedom-is-essential

Important Note: most of our health related info is now being posted at our sister site truthwatchnz.is

Image by Free-Photos from Pixabay

“In NZ everyone has the right to refuse medical treatment including the vaccine” (NZ MOH)

From NZ Lawyer Sue Grey:

An important message from Lawyer Sue Grey to all frontline workers who are threatened with dismissal for saying no to the CV VX

From The Health Forum NZ page @ Facebook

IF YOU ARE A PORT WORKER WHO HAS SAID NO….AND YOUR JOB IS ON THE LINE, THIS IS VITAL INFORMATION FOR YOU

🚨🚨BREAKING NEWS🚨🚨

A legal challenge is underway on behalf of the workers affected by the government’s recent No Jab, No Job legislation. 👩🏽‍⚖️👨🏻‍⚖️🧑‍⚖️
Voices For Freedom is proud to be supporting the challenge filed by employment advocate Ashleigh Fechney and lawyer Sue Grey.
Initial documents have been filed with the Employment Court and more news will be posted as soon as it’s available.
If you are a border worker (port, airport, MIQ) and this legislation affects your employment, please fill in the form linked to be kept up to date with developments and/or become involved as a plaintiff.
Note: Submitting your details does not mean you will be named in the case. It is simply an expression of interest and one of our team will be in touch with you shortly.
P.S. We will be setting up a legal fund for people wishing to contribute financially, so keep an eye out for that announcement.
https://form.jotform.com/212263239850858
Join the mailing list to keep up to date with the case! www.voicesforfreedom.co.nz

Further developments:

BREAKING NEWS … Ashleigh the Advocate, Derek the Advocate and lawyer Sue Grey, I with support from Voices for Freedom filed an urgent application in the Employment Court this afternoon.
We are seeking urgent protection for Crown airport and port employees who resist the draconian Vaccination Order “No Jab No Job” law and prefer not to have this experimental injection that Medsafe rejected for approval as a new medicine due to lack of evidence it was safe and effective.
If we are correct that the No Jab No Job law is unlawful, it will help protect the employment and human rights of many, and will force Minister Hipkins to explain his decisions and actions.
I will keep you posted.
If you would like to be on the mailing list please register with this form:

https://form.jotform.com/212263239850858?fbclid=IwAR0wswdCwWeq_4VZrbcN9kxMMqg1DOQCh-orK_UhTP9jqrajGQnzJfVBP1Y

Further comment from Sue:

Please could affected port and airport workers unite together and assemble lists of affected staff numbers and ways of connecting and sharing information quickly. We would like to be able to explain to the court the scale of the problem and why it would be best to have a single order to protect everyone rather than have to make separate applications for each group.

Image: Voices for Freedom.co.nz

Earlier post from the forum FYI:

URGENT!!
ALL FRONTLINE AND PORT WORKERS!!
URGENT!!


(Message below from Sue Grey)

THANK YOU for the amazing support and encouragement with the No Jab No Job Urgent Employment Court injunction application.
Judging by the number of messages, the scale of the problem is even bigger than I imagined.
Please could groups of affected port and airport workers unite together ( so far as you can) and assemble lists for each affected workplace of affected staff numbers with a contact person, and share these to vaxchallenge@letsbfree.com.
I suggest groups also set up ways of connecting and sharing information quickly. We have a conference with the Chief Judge at 2.30 today so need this asap before then please. We would like to be able to explain to the Employment Court the scale of the problem and why it would be best to have a single order to protect everyone, rather than have to make separate applications for each group.
NB the current “No Job No Jab” law applies to specific groups of Airside and Port workers. Information we have received makes clear that Minister Hipkins’ intends extending this to ALL PUBLIC SERVANTS and likely to other employees.
We hope judicial overview will help protect employee and other human rights, including informed consent and the freedom to accept or decline medical treatment and experimental treatment.

Header Photo: Port Tauranga, Attribution: http://www.freenzphotos.com @ Wikipedia

The Right to Be Let Alone: What to Do When COVID Strike Force Teams Come Knocking

via Health Impact News

We are now at Thursday of the first week of announced “door-to-door” visits by agents working for local governments enforcing the Biden Administration’s directive to get more people “vaccinated” with COVID-19 shots, and so far things are pretty quiet in the local corporate media, and in the alternative media.

Could the push back from the Right last week be making many local communities hesitant to carry out this policy? Time will tell, but as of today, I have only seen 3 reports of this policy being carried out (not counting the leaked documents from Lake County, Illinois that were widely published in the alternative media last week.)

The one that has been the most widely reported in the media so far this week was a report published by WCNC in Charlotte, North Carolina in Mecklenburg County where “49% of the population is partially vaccinated and 46% is fully vaccinated.”

Reporter Chloe Leshner posted the video on her Twitter account:

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/the-right-to-be-let-alone-what-to-do-when-covid-strike-force-teams-come-knocking/

Think U.S. health authorities have never conducted outrageous medical experiments on children, women, minorities, homosexuals and inmates?

Think U.S. health authorities have never conducted outrageous medical
experiments on children, women, minorities, homosexuals and inmates? Think again: This timeline, originally put together by Dani Veracity (a
NaturalNews reporter), has been edited and updated with recent vaccination experimentation programs in Maryland and New Jersey. Here’s what’s really happening in the United States when it comes to exploiting the public for medical experimentation:

http://globalskywatch.com/chemtrails/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=77#Post77

Related Links

Chemical/Biological Spraying of U.S. Citizens is Legal

Historical Examples of Biological Testing On Americans (video)

U.K. Admits Deadly Spraying Performed on Civilians (video)

Biological Warfare On the American People, Dr. Garth Nicolson

Photo: CDC, A participant in the Tuskegee study gets injected with what he thinks is medicine.

The NZ government’s “no jab no job” policy is cruel, irrational & in breach of fundamental employment rights, human rights & the Nuremberg code (NZ Lawyer, Sue Grey)

Note: in her interview with Peter Williams, Lawyer Sue Grey mentions the death of a Feilding nurse at the Palmerston North Hospital the day after taking the CV VX.

The ‘no jab, no job’ policy is applying to front line workers. EWR
______________________________________________________________

From The Health Forum NZ

“Its been a huge week in NZ CV VX land…The fudging of the truths have been coming thick and fast.

Lawyer Sue Grey posted the following…Quote…

“The most blatant false claims I’ve seen are the misrepresentations in the government advertising campaign, some of which have been identified in the KTI High Court Challenge. Some examples of concern to me include:

A)The government advertising using public funds to incorrectly claim the Vax is safe because it has Medsafe approval, when in fact it has only provisional consent subject to 58 conditions and even full message approval does NOT warrant safety

B) Claims the Vax is safe when the clinical safety trials won’t be complete until 2023

C) Claims the Vax is safe when it has not been tested for safety for pregnant women, for people who are frail, for people on anticoagulants or other medications, or for people who have recently had another vaccine

D) Government websites when reporting adverse events (including vaers.com and the EU equivalent), record thousands of post Vax deaths and tens of thousands of strokes, and other outcomes which result in hospitalisation

E) The increasing number of post Vax deaths and hospitalisations in NZ (including the sudden Remuera death and many other similar post Vax unexplained deaths and hospitalisations) which are either not getting reported to the NZ equivalent “CARM” or are being overlooked in weekly reports.

F) The misleading claims about effectiveness as government fine print admits the Pfizer Vax does not prevent infection or transmission and may create asymptomatic carriers. Nobody knows the long term effects of the Vax but they are now talking about recipients needing a top up each year

G) Many countries, including India, Israel, Chile, Samoa, Fiji, Seychelle and Bhutan had another wave of Covid (in many cases their worst wave) AFTER the Vax rollout.

H) At least 40 NZ doctors have signed an OPEN LETTER expressing concern about the Vax rollout and the undermining of INFORMED CONSENT

I) Many healthy NZers who are are at no significant risk from Covid are being bullied to accept this Vax by the government’s “No Jab No Job” policy. This policy is cruel, irrational and is in breach of fundamental employment rights, human rights and the Nuremberg code. When the government overrides fundamental human rights and circulates misleading information for its own purposes contrary to the interests of the people it represents, we have a major constitutional problem.

Photo: By Nick-D – Own work, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=27675283

NZ’s dirtiest political secret: the bloodless coup of 1986

June 2017: Seventeen  years ago a little-known conference of constitutional experts revealed New Zealand’s dirtiest political secret: that in 1986 the NZ Parliament seized control of the country in a bloodless coup, declaring themselves sovereign above the people in a technical but highly significant move. Nearly two decades later, the position has never been rectified…

APRIL 2000: New Zealanders have fewer Constitutional rights than the citizens of Mongolia: that’s the disturbing revelation as delegates gather for a major Constitutional conference in Wellington this month. They’ll be debating whether we need a written Constitution, and whether New Zealand needs to become a Republic but, as IAN WISHART reports, it’s throwing up some embarassing information about our current Parliamentary system:

READ MORE

https://investigatemagazine.co.nz/20804/nzs-dirtiest-political-secret-the-bloodless-coup-of-1986/?fbclid=IwAR34PZPd8SU77dFVwrgXD_OeOOpfgV21CD9DaTtRVGMDvNfZKk4wLHyHndM

Photo: Investigate Magazine

How To Say No If COVID-19 Vaccination Becomes Mandatory

For those of us who believe vaccines to be unsafe and not properly tested, news coming out that plans are underway to mandate vaccination for COVID-19 is troubling.

Bill Gates, a man who everyone knows has the biggest financial stake in all this, has said that we won’t go back to normal until a vaccine has gotten out to the entire world.

Many world leaders are ready to follow Gates’ playbook, like Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who stated, “Normality as it was before will not come back full-on until we get a vaccine for this.”

And now some officials on the ground, those who are directing the logistics of a vaccine rollout, are telling us how imminent these plans may be. Let’s listen to the words of Dr. Allison Arwady, the head of Chicago’s Public Health Department, who tells us “We’ve already bought the syringes, we already know where it’s going to happen…”:

READ MORE

LINK: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/freedom-advocate-explains-how-to-say-no-if-covid-19-vaccination-becomes-mandatory/

The NZ Bill of Rights Act 1990 includes the right to refuse any medical treatment & to hold opinions without interference

Note: this Bill of Rights has now been overridden by Adern’s new COVID-19 Bill. See below. Adern has promised children won’t be taken from their parents but I, like many Kiwis, am not holding my breath on that one. EWR

New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Part II of the Act covers a broad range of Civil and Political Rights. As part of the right to life and the security of the person, the Act guarantees everyone:

1 The right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice (Section 8)

2 The right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment (Section 9)

3 The right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without consent (Section 10)

4 The right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment (Section 11)

 Furthermore, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 guarantees everyone: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion.
This includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief,
INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ADOPT AND HOLD OPINIONS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Section 1)

Let food be thy medicine and medicine be thy food.

QUESTION MORE

(Note: Thanks to Wally Richards for this link)

READ AT THE LINK:

http://www.legislation.govt.nz/act/public/1990/0109/latest/DLM224792.html

I Have a Dream, a Blurred Vision by Michael Parenti

I Have a Dream, a Blurred Vision by Michael Parenti

One of my favourite authors … worth a read EWR

by Michael Parenti
Writer, Dandelion Salad
Originally published August 29, 2013
January 17, 2020

The 50th anniversary of the March on Washington—in which Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. made his famed “I Have a Dream” speech—has recently won renewed attention from various print and electronic media in the United States. But the more attention given to King’s extraordinary speech, the less we seem to know about King himself, the less aware we are about the serious challenges he was presenting, challenges that remain urgent and ignored to this very day.

The March on Washington took place on 28 August 1963. Despite repeated fear mongering by certain commentators and public officials who predicted there would be violence in the streets—over 250,000 people descended upon Washington D.C. in a massive show of unity and peaceful determination.

via I Have a Dream, a Blurred Vision by Michael Parenti

Sex offenders including paedophiles should be allowed to adopt says a leading legal academic! (UK)

More evidence of insanity in the ranks of the so called academics. Or is it simply evidence of the deep seated corruption we are now facing? I think the latter. EWR

From the Telegraph, UK

Rules which bar sex offenders from working with children are ‘unfair’ and even convicted paedophiles should have the right to adopt, a leading legal academic has said.

Helen Reece, a reader in law at the London School of Economics, called on Theresa May, the Home Secretary, to relax rules which automatically ban sex offenders from caring for children, saying that this could breach their human rights.

In an article in the respected Child and Family Law Quarterly, Miss Reece suggested that reoffending rates were not high among sex criminals, adding: “despite growing public concern over paedophilia, the numbers of child sex murders are very low.”

A review is currently ongoing into the Vetting and Barring Scheme, introduced following the 2002 Soham murders, amid concerns by ministers that it is too heavy handed.

As well as banning certain offenders, the law currently requires adults coming into regular contact with children other than their own to be screened.

Mrs May ordered the review amid concerns about the vetting of ordinary volunteers such as parents who drive children to football practice and church flower arrangers.

In her article, Miss Reece suggested that the review should also introduce an assumption that sex offenders including child abusers posed no threat once they had served their sentence.

She said: “There is no reason why all sex offenders should not be considered as potentially suitable to adopt or foster children, or work with them.

“The Vetting and Barring Scheme and other legislative measures single out sex offenders for unfair special treatment and they destroy the principle that a prisoner pays his or her debt by serving their sentence before re-entering society on equal terms.”

Individuals are placed on the “Barred List” and banned from working with youngsters or vulnerable adults if they are convicted of a sexual or violent offence, or one involving the mistreatment of a child.

Miss Reece criticised the rules for leading all sex offenders to be “tarred with the same brush,” saying that while “careful screening” was “important,” the issuing of a “blanket ban” violated the rights of criminals who wanted to adopt or work with young people.

She highlighted the case of a grandfather with a conviction for having sex with a 15-year-old dating back to when he was 29, who was refused permission to adopt his own grandchildren.

The ban could contravene the principle of non-discrimination enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, and may leave the Government open to legal challenge, Miss Reece warned.

Comparing sex offenders to cohabiting couples, she suggested that if blanket bans on the former were allowed, it would make sense to bar those who were not married from adopting because parents who were wed were less likely to separate with harmful consequences for the child.

She also highlighted the case of four nurses who recently won a High Court challenge after being barred for having convictions. One of the nurses was banned over a police caution for leaving her own children alone in their home.

“Rather than presuming that everyone is a potential risk to children and must therefore be vetted, any vetting or barring should be based on very strong evidence that they are a risk,” the academic said.

“This would represent a victory not only for human rights but for protecting the best interests of children.”

Miss Reece has been at the LSE since September 2009, having previously worked at the University of London, University College London and Birkbeck College.

A trained barrister, she has an MSc in logic and scientific method, and was awarded the Socio-Legal Studies Association Book Prize in 2004 for a monograph called “Divorcing Responsibly.

She has also argued that rape victims should no longer be granted anonymity.

A Home Office spokesman said: “It is safe to say that the vetting review will not be considering allowing paedophiles to adopt. It wouldn’t exactly go down well with the public.

“The review is very much focused on seeing whether the rules have gone too far in stopping normal volunteering with children, while continuing to carry out criminal records checks on people in sensitive posts, such as in the NHS.”

 

SOURCE

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/8201521/Sex-offenders-including-paedophiles-should-be-allowed-to-adopt-Theresa-May-told.html?fbclid=IwAR3dJLlMkODR7ZYyDZZe60Va5yzwH3VV90O04uTBXzpg8gFhWjLIJDvtBiI

Elderly Kiwis being detained in locked units

Neo-lib proponents by and large, from my observations, care little about the elderly. They turn them away from ambulance help when they fall. They are placing them into hospices that once were reserved for the terminally ill. I’ve seen it with my own eyes. Watch out for your elderly people, if you care at all. They are not surplus to requirements, any more than you were surplus when you were newborn and couldn’t feed yourself or walk to the bathroom. And remember, you too will be old one day. Few people comment on the elderly posts yet old age is something none of us will escape unless of course we die young.

This article is from Newshub

Elderly Kiwis being detained in locked units

Hundreds of elderly Kiwis are living in secure dementia units even though they never agreed to live there, a new report has found.

The Human Rights Commission report considers legal and ethical concerns around the housing of an estimated 5000 elderly New Zealanders.

The report, called This Is Not My Home, collects essays from lawyers, doctors, academics and a District Court Judge about residential care of older people when that care is provided without the person’s consent.

According to the report, around 4000 New Zealanders are being detained in secure dementia units, with another 1000 in residential psychogeriatric facilities.

Disability Rights Commissioner and acting Chief Human Rights Commissioner Paula Tesoriero says very few of these people have formally consented to being held in these locked facilities.

“It is critical that appropriate safeguards are in place to ensure everyone’s rights and preferences are respected to the greatest extent possible,” says Ms Tesoriero.

“This requires a real commitment to actively support individual decision-making. I hope that the calls for law reform and change of practice identified by the contributors will be carefully considered by all those who can influence change in this area.”

https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/08/elderly-kiwis-being-detained-in-locked-units.html?fbclid=IwAR1AYIeVt9LLVJNdO08bw24v0f1vboPXTDcjp8gxPE-t_EJJyP8Mg7U4LqM

Eye Scans & Finger Prints Now Mandatory To Buy Food & Basic Services In India

it’s coming folks

Had enough of Govt corruption Kiwis? Here is a venue for reporting, exposing & taking action: the “Citizens Government Corruption Watchdog Commission”

By making these reports you are adding to a database of complaints that documents multiple violations. This makes the case for change much stronger and if the department concerned doesn’t act then we can take it to media for publication and to pressure change. Mainstream media will probably be either forced to print our exposes or lose their place as Mainstream Media and those who DO share it will become the new “Mainstream Media”!

Those of you who think beyond the mainstream media … or even those who don’t … you’ve probably noticed a few things are not ticking the boxes lately regarding democratic processes.

Local Government

One example would be the way District Councils appear to have minds of their own and increasingly they are failing to consult those who elect them regarding decisions that will be affecting them. Recently the Whaleoil blog featured the growing problem of local government breaking the law and points out that they get away with it because nobody is policing it. Check out the blog as there are many examples cited of things folks are encountering with their DCs.

Here is a recent example in Shannon where locals were consulted by their representing Councillor Ross Campbell on whether they wanted yet another liquor outlet licensed … overwhelmingly more were against than for (309 to 3) … yet the DC has gone right ahead and issued the liquor license anyway.  So who is this council  batting for? Their constituents, or the liquor industry? No prizes for guessing. Shannon has also had recent issues with discharge by Council of raw sewage into the local waterways, an ongoing issue with many DCs NZ wide. Cr Campbell was  trespassed for two years by HDC for filming the discharge of raw sewage into the town’s waterways. Shutting down dissent!

13087824_1789471571282728_8022369235957712783_n
The street poll by Cr Ross Campbell in the Horowhenua district … the poll overwhelmingly against the issuing of yet another liquor license in Shannon, and the DC has gone and issued the one anyway

The Rangitikei DC was also exposed last year with regard to their long standing non compliance in relation to pollution of its waterways with leachate. They too shut down dissent by failing to accept the recommendation of their own Community Committee!
For further examples of local government corruption see our Local Govt Watch pages.

Health and Related Services

Then we have many services (formerly ‘government’, now ‘corporate’ departments) that blatantly ignore the rules and run rough shod over people. I heard of one for instance just recently. An older woman who was admitted to A & E at a public hospital, left in a cold corridor, no warm blanket, no buzzer, calling for the toilet, left for hours in her own feces then loudly told off! The patient was too sick to respond.

emergency-63621_1280
With recent events in our corporatized government departments we need a watch on our health care providers and their protocols, particularly with the elderly and the dying

Also, on the hospital subject, I heard recently of a dying patient on ‘nil by mouth’, without the family’s knowledge. On this horrific subject please google ‘Liverpool Care Pathway’ the thin end of the wedge in my opinion, to euthanasia. Now there’s huge debate as we know about that, however, since when do we administer ‘nil by mouth’ without explaining the rationale to the distressed relatives, whose loved one is crying out for water? And since when has this become the ‘norm’? Dying of thirst? I don’t recall any public discussion around this.

Weather Modification Practices

Marton NZ, 1 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
Trails over the Rangitikei, here in plain sight in 2014

The other glaring elephant in the room on the topic of flagrancy is the practice of geoengineering … ie spraying us all daily with toxic chemicals then telling us it is only steam or condensation. Or worse, “nothing doing here please move along you ‘conspiracy theorists'”.

There will be many more issues and other departments that spring to mind that need policing. 

Reporting and Taking Action

man-211505_1280
What to do!?

When these various events happen we’re often left standing, mouth open, grasping for who to tell, or, we’re so deep in grief we’re unable to act. And from my experience, often nobody knows just who to tell anyway. Many have tried for instance in the geoengineering domain to approach the various authorities charged with protecting us from unhealthy toxic environments only to be told there’s nothing doing. Denial, yet all the while scientific testing is revealing high levels of toxic chemicals in water and soils. These authorities need to be held to account.

So here is a venue for you to report these various incidents. It’s easy to do, simply go to the site (links below) and fill in the appropriate form online (more forms to come).

corruption

The reports will be collated to reveal the extent of the respective complaints, all documented in reports and kept for evidence when confronting the department concerned, and/or for timely publishing on this and other websites, and on social media. Since our so called mainstream media is displaying a growing reluctance to fully air the truth, we can become a force to be reckoned with. This is people power!

By making these reports you are adding to a database of complaints that documents multiple violations. This makes the case for change much stronger and if the department concerned doesn’t act then we can take it to media for publication and to pressure change. Mainstream media will probably be either forced to print our exposes or lose their place as Mainstream Media and those who DO share it will become the new “Mainstream Media”!

Here are links to both the site and the new Facebook page (head there and ‘like’ the page, and get reporting. You can also report historic incidents).

EnvirowatchRangitikei