Absolute Essential Ceramic Aroma Diffuser. EMF/EMR readings for a supposedly healthy essential oil diffuser. The frequency was measured with an Accoustimeter AM-10. It displayed a constant radiation of 450Mhz at high saturation. Please watch and share and be aware of these types of dangerous devices masquerading as health products.
Smartphones emit several types of electromagnetic fields that can harm our health. In addition to harmful radio-frequency radiation, they also emit blue light. While humans have always been exposed to natural blue light frequencies in nature, our use of smartphones and screens has resulted in unprecedented exponentially increased exposures at all hours of the day and night.
A 2020 study on colorectal cancre and blue light at night with over 2000 subjects found outdoor blue light at night is linked to colon cancer. Watch a video from the scientist at the link…
Image by Dariusz Sankowski from Pixabay
Watch at the Bitchute link below the image:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1uIiWvnGeMZj/
RELATED: https://thedailycoin.org/2017/10/18/deagel-report-eerily-accurate-view-america-will-look-like-2025/
So you’ll be able to download stuff really really fast Palmy folks. Did anybody ask you though if you thought this was a good idea? Or safe? People have presented submissions to your corporation outlining the dangers not told us about 5G & predictably from what I’ve heard they have been ignored. Like with anything that is a danger to our health the corporations that profit get the final say while your corporation parading as a government hasn’t any faint inclination to stand up & say ‘no’… or they don’t want to. There is a video & article below the lamestream article info that will clue you in to what’s really going down with 5G & why they haven’t consulted you and indeed care zilch for your opinion or independent research on the topic. Thing is, you can distance yourself from a tower but 5G has aerials on your street lamp posts. EWR
Yeshuas Child 2.59K subscribers music by Green day http://www.steelintheair.com/Blog/201… http://www.pressdemocrat.com/news/786… https://medium.com/@omarmasry/10-key-… http://scientists4wiredtech.com/2017/… https://spectrum.ieee.org/video/telec… https://wia.org/wp-content/uploads/WI… health http://scientists4wiredtech.com/2017/… http://scientists4wiredtech.com/2017/… Smart Cities https://www.ctia.org/docs/default-sou… https://www.tillmanglobal.com/https://www.verizon.com/about/news/at… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSN9U… 5G Technology Explained https://spectrum.ieee.org/video/telec…
RELATED ARTICLE:
Photo Credit: Wikipedia
I’m sure this is just coincidence (not!). Listen to the Corbett report on Bill’s latest ‘investment’ and yes his wealthy mates are in on it as well. Re creating your food supply for you, and your infants’ food supply. Below is a link to the articles that shocked us all in 2016 about why breast feeding was being re framed or packaged if you like, as unnatural. Further down is the Corbett video. A must watch as always. EWR
RELATED: Pediatrics Journal says to stop calling breastfeeding natural
So our infants need corn syrup & GMOs? – Mike Adams on CNN’s “breastfeeding’s not natural” debacle
Image by Cheryl Holt from Pixabay
Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
Buy a headset … and no point checking with the respective industries on this, like Monsanto & Roundup they’ll invariably continue to deny this damning evidence & much of the gullible public will swallow the lies. And your government of course will just turn a blind eye. Yawn. Good luck with that. EWR
From phonegatealert.org
The Court of Appeal of Turin confirms in a full judgment published on 13 January 2020 (904/2019 of 3.12.2019 , Romeo v. INAIL) the decision of the Tribunal of Ivrea of 2017. Judge Fadda considers that the worker’s acoustic neuroma (benign tumour of the head) was indeed caused by the use of the mobile phone.
According to the Court:
“there is protective scientific jurisprudence that supports the assertion of causation based on criteria of “more likely than not”. P.33.”
And to add:
“Epidemiological data, the results of experiments on animals (not contradicted, at present, by other experiments of the same type), the duration and intensity of exposure … which are particularly important in view of the dose-response relationship established – at the scientific level – between exposure to mobile phone radiofrequencies and the risk of acoustic neuroma, as well as the absence of any other factor which could have caused the disease”.
All the scientific elements of the case were re-examined and re-analysed by two new experts appointed by the Court of Turin (Carolina Marino, Angelo D’Errico). The Court of Appeal fully accepted their conclusions and rejected INAIL’s* appeal, stating that CTU had provided:
“strong evidence to assert a causal role between the complainant’s occupational exposure, his exposure to radiation from mobile phones and the disease that occurred”.
This is the second Italian appeal judgment in favour of a worker after the Brescia judgment in 2010, which concluded with the confirmation of the Supreme Court in 2012, case of Marcolini v. INAIL. In this case, the Court of Bergamo had rejected the application in first instance.
The Romeo v. INAIL case is therefore historic. It is the first in world judicial history to have had two consecutive judgments in favour of the plaintiff. It is also historic because of the principles underlying this decision and particularly because it is written about the conflicts of interest of certain experts close to the mobile phone industry.
READ MORE
Photo: Image by Anastasia Gepp from Pixabay
From takebackyourpower.net
In 2019 Senator Richard Blumenthal grilled wireless industry representatives, who admitted the industry has done ZERO health & safety studies on 5G technology. Meanwhile, dozens of independent studies indicates that 5G is a risk to all biological life. Watch the video below.
[WASHINGTON, DC]— During today’s Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee hearing on the future of 5G wireless technology and their impact on the American people and economy, U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-CT) raised concerns with the lack of any scientific research and data on the technology’s potential health risks.
Blumenthal blasted the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)—government agencies jointly-responsible for ensuring that cellphone technologies are safe to use—for failing to conduct any research into the safety of 5G technology, and instead, engaging in bureaucratic finger-pointing and deferring to industry.
In December 2018, Blumenthal and U.S. Representative Anna G. Eshoo (CA-18) sent a letter to FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr seeking answers regarding potential health risks posed by new 5G wireless technology. At today’s hearing, Blumenthal criticized Carr for failing to provide answers, and instead, just echoing, “the general statements of the FDA, which shares regulatory responsibility for cell phones with the FCC.” Blumenthal also decried the FDA’s statements as “pretty unsatisfactory.” A PDF of Carr’s complete response is available here.
READ MORE
December last year, now is that not when the virus showed up? Just saying.
