We have been banned yet again by fakebook for posting truth. This is posted for the benefit of those who still believe the lies we are being spun about safety. What this should read regarding testing (it is added to the ‘ban’ notice) is, ‘…. go through up to 10 years worth of testing’ but of course we know this was churned out in less than 12 months and the last batch of ferrets used to test it DIED. All of them. And monitored closely?
The ‘system’ if you like, is in full on cover up mode. And facebook is lending a helping hand… which is not surprising given it’s alleged “that the folks fact checking claims on vaccines are funded in part by an organization that holds over $1.8 billion of stock in a vaccine company. See this article ‘Congressman Exposes Billion Dollar Vaccine Company Ties to Facebook’s Fact Checker’... I quote:
“Anyone who even questions the safety of the vaccine on Facebook’s platform is immediately slapped with a fact check warning by this group. This is in spite the alarming number of reported adverse reactions, including thousands of deaths within the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).
As TFTP reported, the sheer number of reports alone should be enough to set off some alarm bells. But this has not happened. Instead, the mainstream media “fact checks” those who merely try to point out this information.
In several “fact checks” of this data, we are told that we shouldn’t “draw conclusions about the safety of vaccines.” This is absolutely true, but the very reason VAERS was created is to conduct surveillance of potential issues with vaccines. If there have been more adverse events reported in three months than there have been over any year since 1990, this should, at the very least, spark an official inquiry.
From 2011 to 2020, there were just994 deaths reported to VAERS after ALL vaccinations. In the first quarter of 2021, there have been over 2,700 reported deaths. If they are truly claiming to surveil the vaccine safety realm, this is the type of thing that should set off an alarm or an investigation.“
In normal circumstances, if deaths were occurring following an experimental v a x then the said v a x would be withdrawn until further testing was completed. Is this happening? No it is not. You dear people, are the test case. This in jection is approved for experimental use only. Nevertheless NZ plans to v a x every one of us. (If we consent that is).
So where is the concern at the death of a baby, a toddler, a teen and a young adult? First we saw the elderly ‘dying like flies’ as one care worker stated; now we are seeing little ones with no voice, and trusting young people, with their lives cut short. Their loved ones will be in shock at not only their deaths but at the system they trusted with their lives, the system that told them the jab is ‘safe and effective’. That they’re doing it for ‘the team’, to keep everybody safe. So in shock they will not think to report to VAERS. And it appears the system’s health professionals are not inclined to report either (see this video). For one they are not reimbursed for the half hour of time it takes (unlike the large incentives paid out for writing the c v word on the death cert) and second, we are hearing some health professionals just will not report.
Thanks to NZ Lawyer Sue Grey who has highlighted this important piece of info.
See the screenshots capturing the changes to NZ’s official Ministry of Health website between 12 and 20 April. All the warnings about life-threatening allergic reactions have disappeared.
The page on the left (below) is 12 April. The page on the right is the equivalent from 20 April.
Pages 1 & 2 enlarged below show the different versions
The sentence/point on Pfizer allergic reactions as appear (highlighted) on 12 April have been omitted on the updated page dated 20 April
The obvious question is of course: ‘why would your government that is committed to your health and safety, omit important info on possible allergic reactions? FYI if you look at the other links provided below, anaphylactic reactions are not as rare as we are being told. (See The Health Impact News website that is consistently recording the data). The pdf download at this link, page 7, states that ‘Serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been reported.’ Noticeable particularly are the statements, over and over,
Add to the above info this, from Health Forum NZ’s FB page:
“Here is the link to the recently updated New Zealand Immunization Handbook published by Medsafe.Utterly astonishingly….In the CV 19 section….There is NO information about REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS OR INJURY. No link to the CARM reporting system. No encouragement for doctors, hospitals or patients to report reactions. I find this quite incredible!!” https://www.health.govt.nz/…/5-coronavirus-disease…
RELATED (for your own perusal of risks vs benefits):
Abstract: COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers have been exempted from legal liability for vaccine-induced harm. It is therefore in the interests of all those authorising, enforcing and administering COVID-19 vaccinations to understand the evidence regarding the risks and benefits of these vaccines, since liability for harm will fall on them.
In short, the available evidence and science indicate that COVID-19 vaccines are unnecessary, ineffective and unsafe.
Necessity: Immunocompetent individuals are protected against SARS-CoV-2 by cellular immunity. Vaccinating low-risk groups is therefore unnecessary. For immunocompromised individuals who do fall ill with COVID-19 there is a range of medical treatments that have been proven safe and effective. Vaccinating the vulnerable is therefore equally unnecessary. Both immunocompetent and vulnerable groups are better protected against variants of SARS-CoV-2 by naturally acquired immunity and by medication than by vaccination.
Efficacy: Covid-19 vaccines lack a viable mechanism of action against SARS-CoV-2 infection of the airways. Induction of antibodies cannot prevent infection by an agent such as SARS-CoV-2 that invades through the respiratory tract. Moreover, none of the vaccine trials have provided any evidence that vaccination prevents transmission of the infection by vaccinated individuals; urging vaccination to “protect others” therefore has no basis in fact.
Safety: The vaccines are dangerous to both healthy individuals and those with pre-existing chronic disease, for reasons such as the following: risk of lethal and non-lethal disruptions of blood clotting including bleeding disorders, thrombosis in the brain, stroke and heart attack; autoimmune and allergic reactions; antibody-dependent enhancement of disease; and vaccine impurities due to rushed manufacturing and unregulated production standards.
Across the ditch…Health workers are not turning up for their CV V in droves…up to 80% of all appointments cancelled or no show. In May, Sydney will open a mega hub for vaccination…. 5,000 administrations per day.
“NSW sees rise in vaccination cancellations for frontline healthcare workersNew South Wales has seen a 70 to 80 per cent increase in ‘no shows’ and appointment cancellations from frontline healthcare workers following the announcement regarding the safety of the AstraZeneca vaccine for certain age groups.”
Dr Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd, talks about his grave concerns about the Coronavirus jab. Listen to him interview with James Delingpole. A good follow up is a commentary by David Icke. He provides & speaks to a transcript of Dr Yeadon’s interview, calling out the MDs & other health professionals complicit in this. He also speaks to our need to resist.
ILION, WEST ATHENS — AstraZeneca crimes against humanity continue as another victim dies in Europe shortly after the shot.
A 65-year-old woman received the first dose of the AstraZeneca viral vector shot at the Ilion Health Centre on or around March 29, according to Skai News in Piraeus, Greece. She waited the customary 20 minutes to ensure there were no immediate side effects.
Protecting public and environmental health even with a lack of evidence of damage from new products and processes is the foundation for the Precautionary Principle. So what happens when the scientific evidence on the dangers of wireless radiation is proven, but public health and safety agencies ignore it? For scientists, researchers, and public health advocates, you issue a clarion call. Epidemiological rock stars Dr. John William Frank and Dr. Anthony B. Miller are answering that call, joining the international appeal of hundreds of scientists for a moratorium on the rollout of 5G networks. In their first interview ever together, they joined EHT President and Founder Dr. Devra Davis to discuss the science of radiofrequency radiation (RF-EMF), the epidemiological evidence for effects, and the precise technology that should be included in studies on the impacts of 5G. Frank, chairman of Public Health Research and Policy at the Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics at University of Edinburgh, is one of the world’s leading scientists studying the social and nonscientific determinants influencing public health policies. In his recent publication, “Electromagnetic fields, 5G and health: what about the precautionary principle?”, published in the Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, Frank notes that despite the claims of scientific advisory committees that there’s no proof of harm, the science is most certainly leaning toward taking a cautious approach. “Until we know more about what we are getting into, from a health and ecological point of view, those putative gains (from 5G) need to wait,” Frank writes. Subscribe to EHT’s YouTube to get more news and information on 5G and wireless. Sign Up for EHT’s newsletter at https://ehtrust.org/publications/news… Like EHT on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/EHTrust Follow EHT on Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/ehtrust/ Learn and Support EHT on Patreon at https://www.patreon.com/ehtrust
Thanks to the UK Column. A must listen. What stands out as seen elsewhere, is the initial denial by the authorities about any connection to the injection. EWR (Thanks to the robinwestenra blog for this link).
Nicola knows all too well that vaccines have dangerous side effects. Her fit, healthy, 58 year old husband had the Oxford vaccine (first jab) and very soon after was very ill. He is in hospital and was diagnosed with suspected Transvers Myelitis. This is now re-diagnosed as Guillain-Barre syndrome. As her husband struggles to breathe and cannot walk, he is isolated without visitors on a neurology ward, with many other vaccine adverse reaction cases. Nicola says people need to be told the harsh reality about the dangerous side effects of vaccines, and asks “Why were we not told?”
In New Zealand if you dare to stand up and ask intelligent questions about the SAFETY of the experimental Pfizer Covid 19 vaccines….prepare to don your flack jacket and jump for cover.The brave enquirers are treated like something nasty to be scraped off the sole of a shoe. If you’re lucky you’ll get away with a bullet graze as the label “Anti Vaxer” or “Tin Foil Hatter” whistles past your ear. If you’re not so lucky…watch relationships crumble, and find yourself joining the dole line. It probably wont change what happens to you here in NZ, but you might like to cast your eyes over this letter sent to the European Medicine’s Agency in February 2021. The authors are asking questions….akin to those you and I dare to raise. Between them they have a cumulative hundreds of years experience in the fields of medicine and science. Not “Quacks”. Highly respected, massively experienced practitioners of medicine and experts in human biology. Their concerns are great. Great enough to request a HALT to the vaccine roll out unless their questions of safety can be answered.Keep asking your questions folks….and invest in a top quality Flack Jacket https://doctors4covidethics.medium.com/urgent-open-letter…
“Our ‘friends’ in the mainstream media have been too quick to tell us deaths are assumed to be only “coincidentally” associated with vaccination before all the evidence is in. This raises an obvious question: Is the assumption that the experimental COVID-19 vaccines are never the cause of death scientifically justified or is it a symptom of bias?” principia-scientific.com
This is a developing story. Mainstream media pulls original story of Australian sailors on HMAS Sydney suffering widespread adverse reactions to COVID19 vaccinations. Sanitized version refers only to “mild side effects” despite the fact the ship’s crew needed hospitalization.
This latest setback for the pro-vaccine lobby follows soon after the Australian government performs a U-turn on mass vaccination policy the day after the Australian Health Minister falls ‘critically ill’immediately after getting his COVID jab.
So, whenever the mainstream media conspires to quietly ‘disappear’ web pages of a story it has already reported on you can bet something far bigger and worrisome is being covered up.
In this latest case, the UK’s Daily Mail yesterday pulled a story from their pages about adverse COVID jab reactions among the crew of an Australian war ship.
Direct from Australia, a valued contact told us by email: “Our health minister is still in the hospital from the day after he had his injection! Not a word about the navy hospitalisations. What a way to take out a country’s military… In just one jab!” Our contact refers to the story earlier this week of Australian Health Minister, Gregg Hunt, who was taken seriously ill in a “critical condition” after he received his dose of the untested, experimental vaccine. In a statement on Tuesday evening his office stated that Minister Hunt had: “been admitted to hospital with a suspected infection, he is being kept overnight for observation and is being administered antibiotics and fluid.”
Ft Myers, FL (3-13-20; MedicalVeritas.org)—The author of the world’s best-selling oldest-running book in the field of emerging viruses and communicable diseases, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, is battling the Pfizer drug company and its affiliates for concealing evidence proving a conspiracy involving U.S. military agents, agencies, and their media, committing civil rights abuses against religious leaders for prompting ‘vaccination hesitancy’ that is considered a risk to U.S. National Security.
Horowitz filed his lawsuit against Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccine makers, their advertisers, and distributors in early December, 2020. He claims corrupted science, genetically-engineered viruses, and DNA corrupting mRNA vaccines, risks people’s health and safety, and has damaged him personally.
Dr. Horowitz claims the defendants have committed unfair competition, deceptive trade, and religious freedom deprivations against him and his colleagues.
The Harvard-trained public health scholar is also a Levitical priest advocating for The Royal Bloodline of David. He is suing to secure his right to compete against the drug cartel using more natural products based on Bible laws and a Bible code decryption. Advocating for “religious commerce,” he pioneered a competing anti-microbial called “OxySilverTM with 528” and advertises it as a “Holy Water.” The “528Hz frequency wave” has been shown in scientific studies to positively impact mRNA function and DNA gene expression. That gives the doctor “standing” to bring the claim of “tortious interference” with religious commerce that competes directly against risky vaccines and antibiotics.
The drug syndicate’s advertisers, including Hearst, Conde Naste, and Forbes, smeared the doctor and his OxySilver product in national publications.
Consequently, Horowitz is asking the court for immediate “discovery” to prevent more “irreparable harm” by revealing the syndicate’s underlying scheme to target religious leaders advancing “vaccination hesitancy” that officials advancing the public/private alliance claim undermines bio-defenses and U.S. National Security.
“Since 2016, with the passage of the National Biodefense Strategy Act,” Dr. Horowitz explained, “when Hearst defamed me and Dr. Andrew Wakefield for our vaccination risk-awareness activism, defamatory media attacks increased.
BELOW IS A POST FOLLOWING THE DECEMBER 2020 FILING:
Dr. Leonard Horowitz Files COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuit to Block FDA’s Approval
Ft Myers, FL (12-3-20; MedicalVeritas.org)—A world leading vaccine risk analyst, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, has filed a COVID-19 vaccine lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida to oppose the FDA’s approval of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines until the companies, alleged to have falsely advertised safety, perform tests on the genetic impacts admittedly neglected by the companies.
“Vaccinations” or “Genetic Intoxications”?
Not actually “vaccines” in the traditional sense, but “genetic therapies” according to the companies, the court is asked to enjoin the government from approving and distributing the injections due to neglected genetic safety science and inadequate testing.
“Genetics (specified analyses) are not evaluated in this study,” the Pfizer Protocol admitted. The same is true for the Moderna vaccine.
Dr. Horowitz’s 84-page lawsuit holds Pfizer and Moderna vaccine advertisers and distributors accountable for false advertising of the vaccines’ safety under Florida’s unfair and deceptive trade act and whistleblower law. Eight claims are brought by the whistleblowing doctor and litigator who has asked the court for a number of “remedies” besides the injunction.
One of Horowitz’s remedies would require Defendants to supplement their COVID-19 vaccine trials to assess the risks of genetic alterations to human DNA and viral genes.
“The injunction should require Defendants to . . . assess the risks of genetic ‘reassortments’ of latent DNA and RNA tumor viruses in medically or immune compromised people,” the lawsuit pleads.
“The injunction should require the federal government to suspend its acquisition of the Defendants’ COVID-19 vaccines until such a time as the aforementioned safety concerns are studied and resolved by supplemental trials, the results of which are candidly published,” the doctor added.
False Safety Advertising Might Worsen Outcomes
Dr. Horowitz’s complaint raises criminal concerns beyond consumer fraud by Pfizer, Moderna, their advertisers and distributors at Hearst Corp and Henry Schein, Inc. There is a broader financial and media enterprise involved.
The complaint reminds the court of Pfizer’s criminal fine of $2.3 billion—the largest health care fraud settlement in history for complicity in causing the opioid crisis.
Advertisements filed with the court proclaim safety of the mRNA vaccines without “reasonable justification.” This evidences “deceptive trade” according to the complaint.
The whistleblower argues that the Defendants “omitted material facts in advertisements implying safety had been ‘observed’ in these mRNA genetic studies whereas the official protocol stated: ‘No testing of the participant’s DNA will be performed’ (p. 52).”
“This neglect happened even though the virus’s ‘spike protein’ attachment mechanism was genetically reconfigured in the Pfizer and Moderna labs.
The alleged neglect of genetic safety studies occurred even though the therapeutic impact of the mRNA targets DNA production of spike protein antigens to induce antibody production demonstrating “DNA modulation and trickery,” the lawsuit explains.
Horowitz expressed most concern that, “Officials concealed the risk of Pfizer and Moderna’s genetic sequences recombining with other viruses in humans or the environment, increasing the risk and likelihood of additional ‘novel’ outbreaks and disastrous pandemics.”
Via Pzelda: https://bitchute.com/channel/PZELDA/ : “Kristi Simmonds Experience Continues With Her Effects From The Covid Vaccine (Moderna) After Going Public.
“Kristi Simmonds is an RN who loves her job, loves her friends and family, loves her clients, and loves her life. She decided to receive the COVID vaccine, in hopes of protecting her family, her clients, and to make to statement to her fellow coworkers that this vaccine is safe. Unfortunately, she was very wrong. She received the Moderna COVID vaccine on Tuesday, January 19th, and by Thursday, January 21st, she was in her local hospital having a severe allergic reaction, where her throat and tongue swelled up to the point of her having trouble breathing (which has been very common in both types of the vaccine). After a round of prednisone and Benadryl, she was sent home and told to continue the Benadryl until the swelling subsided. After four days of rest, she was able to finally get back to work on Tuesday, January 26th. Other than feeling a little more tired than usual, she did a full days worth of work, drove home, and began her normal bedtime routine around 9pm. And that’s when her world changed. She started having uncontrollable muscle movements, body convulsions, and extreme pain all over her body. After finally getting her in their vehicle, her husband drove her to our local emergency room, where she had to be lifted out of her vehicle and placed in a wheelchair to be taken inside, because she had no control over her arms or legs. After doing blood work and a urinalysis (and after finding out that she had had the COVID vaccine), she was told she was having a panic attack, and discharged. Believing the blood work and urinalysis was wrong (she was given a copy of her results, and could read them, being an RN), and that she was incorrectly diagnosed and discharged, she left, and went to another emergency room the same night. Unfortunately, she was again sent home, saying the symptoms she was experiencing were not an emergency, and to follow up with her primary care doctor. The following day, she spoke to her primary care doctor, who had her come in immediately, and upon initial inspection knew that this was no panic attack, and it was indeed an emergency.
Kristi was sent to Winston-Salem, NC, to an emergency room down there, on the advice of her primary care doctor, in the hope that one of their on-call neurologists would be able to help. They were not, and so she was sent home yet again. If you’re keeping score, she has been seen on four different occasions by emergency room medical staff, at three different hospitals, none of which were able to help her. She is still suffering from these muscles spasms/full body convulsions, and intense pain all over her body. She has been prescribed multiple medicines, and she is out of work from now until the foreseeable future.
On the morning of January 19th, Kristi woke up a happy, healthy 40-year-old woman, headed to her job with plans of getting a vaccine to help ease the tension and prove it was safe. As of right now, we do not know of these symptoms she’s having are permanent, or will cause permanent damage to her body/nervous system.We believe, as well as her primary care doctor, that these symptoms are directly related to the Moderna COVID vaccine she received.”
The report covers data collected from December 9, 2020, through February 21, 2021, for the two experimental COVID vaccines currently in use in the U.K. from Pfizer and AstraZeneca.
They report a total of 460 deaths and 243,612 injuries.
BHIWANDI, MAHARASHTRA — Mr. Sukhdeo Kirdit left his house Tuesday morning for his second dose of an experimental shot. He never returned that evening.
The 45-year-old chauffeur received the second dose of a COVID-19 “vaccine” at 11 a.m. in a Bhiwandi hospital, according to The New Indian Express. He immediately started feeling “giddiness.” The situation quickly deteriorated further. Mr. Kurdit was rushed to nearby Indira Gandhi Memorial Hospital, but was pronounced dead on arrival.
On Friday, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted Emergency Use Authorization for Johnson & Johnson’s (J&J) COVID vaccine, paving the way for the one-shot vaccine to be administered beginning this week.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also recommended the vaccine for people 18 and older. On Sunday, J&J revealed plans to test its one-shot vaccine on infants, including newborns, pregnant women and the immunocompromised. The expanded clinical trials were laid out in the company’s application for emergency use approval and in briefing materials provided to the FDA and discussed briefly during the meeting.
According to the New York Times, the plan for expanded clinical trials met the approval of Dr. Ofer Levy, director of the Precision Vaccines Program at Harvard’s Boston Children’s Hospital and a member of the FDA’s advisory committee that reviewed the company’s vaccine data.
Comments by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News
Texas Governor Greg Abbott made headlines today by ending a state-wide face mask mandate, and allowing businesses to fully reopen.
But it was an announcement he made at the end of last week that is raising some eyebrows among those waking up to the fact that many seniors are dying soon after being injected with the experimental COVID vaccines…
…the state hopes to vaccinate at least half of all Texas seniors by the week’s end. (Source.)
Photo: Airmen and Soldiers with the Texas National Guard perform COVID-19 testing as part of the Texas Mobile Testing Team program in Bryan, Texas. Image source.
This is from 2019. They had been fighting 2 years to get the tower out! Still denying it causes harm. Whatever happened to the precautionary principle? Not in the big corporation’s interests to consider that. Any slight hint of risk, (and independent evidence says there is, watch Josh del Sol’s Take Back Your Power doco) …and these should not be anywhere near a school. And yet I see them all the time near & even in schools. This is a total crime. (See our EMF & Smart Meter pages, main menu). EWR
The affected students at Weston Elementary School in Ripon are all under the age of 10
They each have different types of cancer: brain, kidney, liver and lymphoma
There is scant evidence that cell phone towers pose a real risk to humans
But even skeptics say the number of cases in this cluster is unusual
Sprint, which owns the tower, has shut it down despite insisting the radio frequency levels are 100 times below the federal limit
A private investigator for the patients’ moms found the levels were higher than reported
Still not causative then going by NZ’s Immunologist?
The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Feb. 12 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 929 reported deaths, about one-third occurred within 48 hours.
According to new data released today, as of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since Dec. 14, 2020.
VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a determination can be made as to whether the reported adverse event was directly or indirectly caused by the vaccine.
Revisiting a post from March 2019 with some updated links FYI, pertinent at this time as today the new experimental covid vaccine rolls out on the NZ public.
Firstly, although vaccines in NZ are not mandatory, there is an expectation nevertheless that you be vaccinated & questioning that narrative is not seen as reasonable at all. Witness the phone calls elderly get telling them to ‘get in and get their flu shots’ or the visits to the homes of non vaccinating parents inquiring why they are declining shots? This does happen I assure you. EWR
The 2019 article:
“Last week amidst a measles outbreak in Christchurch [2019 note], social media has been in full on discussion about vaccines with an article by TV1 news featuring Nigel Latta, another prominent person weighing in on a borderline push insisting that parents vaccinate their children. (Truthstream Media’s video titled Free Speech and Shutting Down the Vaccine Debate is unfortunately ‘no longer available’ on YT). Google, Amazon & Facebook are all involved in this. And meanwhile, Duncan Garner has labeled anybody who refuses to vaccinate a ‘murderer’. Note, nary a mention of all the babies who have died following vaccination.“
Vaccination in NZ is not compulsory. See the official email from the NZ Health Dept website below.
These prominent persons who are waving their self assumed ‘authority’ over you & your families under your noses, should in my opinion concentrate more on urging parents to obtain all the scientific literature from both sides of the vaccination issue before proceeding with their own informed & well researched decision that will benefit their children. Same as we should on any proposed medical procedure. Instead, Latta has likened such thinking folk to flat earthers.
Recently we posted a video featuring talk back radio where a young mother who is also a psychology graduate & whose six week old baby was vaccine injured, made a plea for full disclosure by the health professionals of the possible risks vs the possible benefits of a vaccine. One hour after vaccination, this young mother says her baby woke up screaming & over two days turned into a floppy rag doll with a high pitched shrill moan … his brain was swelling. Listen to her speak in the following short clip.
So according to Latta’s thinking, anybody who questions this medical procedure (what are the contents of the vaccine? Are there any side effects to consider? and so on) are actually “as legitimate as those at the Flat Earth Society”. Surely this young woman’s desire to be informed of the said risks vs benefits should not qualify her to be considered by health professionals as a so called ‘conspiracy theorist’? (the favourite go-to of those who would prefer you didn’t look at the facts).
I’m very disappointed as I really admired Latta’s work with the Shadowlands series. Yet on this issue he clearly is not for our parental right of choice. There are now enough testimonies from parents of deceased babies & disabled children who wish they had been informed of the risks and who cannot now turn back the clock. If you doubt that please visit the Vaxxed Youtube channel & hear all the heartbroken parents speaking out. View the before & after videos of their precious little ones, changed forever. Any parent’s worst nightmare. The disturbing thing about that is their numbers are increasing.
To not weigh up the risks of injury versus the benefits, in light of the current available information, would in my opinion be very irresponsible.
This is not however how the medical establishment sees this. They want you to get the vaccine, no questions asked. Hitler would be proud.
With respect to the parental right to decline a vaccine, folk have been sharing their experiences recently following the post of an article about children of non consenting parents being pressured by nurses at their schools to be vaccinated regardless of their parents’ wishes. A blatant violation of human rights. Details are in this article:
Parents having read this article made the following comments in social media:
My daughters were approached by nurses at school “gently” encouraging them to persuade me, they also rang me to question my judgment….I’M THE PARENT not them how dare they question my decisions for my daughters.
I’ve had lengthy conversations with my 11 and a half year old about this..today he said his teacher was telling them all they have to get vaccinated to keep them safe and asking them questions like “you do want to be safe and live don’t you?” , the teacher proceeded to tell the kids they needed to go home this evening and tell their parents that they need to make an appointment with the doctor asap…they have a vaccination program for the year 8s at his school and I told him he has my full permission to refuse and if they pressure him to demand to be able to call me or run away from the area that they are vaccinating.
I received HPV vaccination over 12 years ago now, when my mum sent in a form that said she didn’t consent to me receiving it. I gave it to the nurse who tossed it in the bin, then gave it to me anyways.. when I got home I told my mum & the next day she called a meeting with the school principal, vice principal and all my teachers and went offfff. After that day they didn’t even bother giving me any forms for vaccinations because they didn’t want my mum to come down to the school again.
When my boy was attending Intermediate school they were being targeted for diptheria, tetanus pertussis (triple vaccine) and as a parent I rang to ask where was the info for the parents. Answer was “oh we don’t do this anymore and hardly anyone turns up” So I was invited along to an assembly where they addressed all the kids. My boy had been sent on an errand unbeknown to me and when the session was finished he turned up almost in tears as he had “missed out”. Now the session included a video of propaganda showing an old school photo of a class with circles around a few pupils (can’t remember which way around it was to use as an example who was spreading disease). The Deputy Principal allowed for questions of the 2 DHB nurses present. One South African boy asked what bad reactions could happen and the nurse had to acknowledge “anaphylactic shock”. I raised my hand to ask a question and the DP gave me the most evil look then promptly closed the whole session down and sent everyone back to class. What hope is there if the teachers are propagandised leaves me worried and wondering …..
Parents now also need to be aware that some children are being prescribed anti-depressants without parental consent.
Clearly some medical staff are taking it upon themselves to apply pressure to children which is not acceptable. As to prescribing anti depressants without parental consent, that is definitely crossing the line. Watch your children parents. Listen to them. And be involved & know what is happening at their schools. Make it clear to those concerned what your expectations are regarding any health procedure.
Note also the right of choice has also been removed from the staff of a Christchurch school regarding their own choice to vaccinate. Unvaccinated teachers face a fine of $2,000:
To conclude here is a reply from the NZ government’s health website to the question: Please advise if immunisation in New Zealand is compulsory or that it is up to the person and/or parents to make that decision. Your website is not very clear on all of this. [Note since reposting this on 20/2/21 I’ve not been able to locate this letter any more on the site … it may be there but I cannot find it].
From: info@health.govt.nz <info@health.govt.nz> To: xxxx (name supplied) Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2019, 9:45:57 AM GMT+13
Subject: Re: Immunisation
Good morning,
Thank you for your email. Getting immunised is voluntary in New Zealand, and it is an individual’s (or parent’s/guardian’s) choice whether or not they or their child agree to being immunised.
Note under the Health (Immunisation) Regulations 1995 all early childhood education centres and primary schools must maintain an immunisation register, and may request that the caregiver provides their child’s immunisation certificate or record that the child is not immunised.
Your health practitioner will be able to provide you with information that will allow you to make an informed choice. Health professionals have a duty to give honest and open information about any medical treatment, which includes immunisations. This ensures that the individual or parent/guardian is able to give their full consent to the immunisation. The individual or parent/guardian needs to understand the benefits and risks of immunisation, including those to the child and their community, in order to make an informed choice and give informed consent.
The information about immunisation on our website is based on the overwhelming body of scientific evidence that shows the benefits of immunisation far outweigh its risks. This position underpins the health systems of every country in the world. Another website you may find useful is that of the Immunisation Advisory Centre (IMAC), which provides independent information about vaccine-preventable diseases and the benefits and risks of immunisation (http://www.immune.org.nz).
“..did not have an allergic reaction to the vaccine”? 25 mins afterwards? Do you really believe that? These people are relying on your gullibility. EWR _______________________________________________________________________
NEW YORK (CNN) – New York health officials are sharing more details about the death of a man who received a COVID-19 vaccine.
He collapsed Sunday, approximately 25 minutes after he was vaccinated at Javits Center New York City.
The man later died at the hospital.
The health commissioner says the man did not have an allergic reaction to the vaccine.
“…mentioning Sara had the Pfizer COVID mRNA injection was being censored and deleted in social media..” why then do they not want people to know this? This is the vaccine being currently rolled out in NZ. EWR ________________________________________________________________________
“As we reported yesterday, the CDC has stated on their website that there have been 1,170 deaths recorded in the U.S. following the experimental mRNA COVID injections, and according to the CDC and the FDA, NONE of them are related to the “COVID vaccines.”
Do you really believe this? ________________________________________________________________________
by Brian Shilhavy Editor, Health Impact News
The COVID Blog is reporting that 28-year-old Sara Stickles from Beloit, Wisconsin, a healthcare worker at SwedishAmerican Hospital, has suffered a brain aneurysm and is now brain dead just 5 days after receiving the second experimental mRNA COVID injection from Pfizer.
Sadly, this is another instance reported where a young healthcare worker in the prime of their life and with no previous existing health conditions has died after being injected with one of the experimental mRNA COVID injections.
She was an organ donor, so her body is being kept alive until they find suitable recipients for her organs.
“If you want the COVID-19 vaccine and aren’t in line to get it, there are still a number of vaccine trials- some involving kids.
Lakshy Patel is in the eighth grade and going to school virtually hasn’t been easy.
“The WiFi problems, so I really get stressed out. I really want to go back to school,” said Patel, who is also a vaccine trial participant.
Getting the vaccine could help him get back to school in person. It’s one reason Patel is participating in the Moderna trial for adolescents. It’s a two to one ratio of vaccine to placebo.”
There are 100, 12 to 17-year-olds participating in the Moderna adolescent trial through Houston Fights COVID. There are more trials coming, and the groups are now seeking participants as young as six months old.”
I imagine with what is going on right now in the world… this must be how Noah felt as the doors on the ark closed & the deluge began … for years he’d warned the people of what was coming but his warnings fell on deaf ears. His father heart only wished their good but they just mocked him. They do it still and call us conspiracy theorists, even when the conspiracy turns out to be proven fact. I’m sad to say that the ‘flood’ has started in earnest … and nobody wants to listen.
If you are still unconvinced visit these two posts:
And read this information written in 1988 by Eustice Mullins (it is also on the Resources page should the link fail at all)… see there also info in a downloadable doc for those who are still undecided on the imminent medical treatment being offered here in NZ this week by Pfizer (feel free to email it / share it) :
Big Tech and its Federal Communications Commission (FCC) toadies have used a fraudulent test to license cell phones, wireless technology and now 5G to push a technology that causes catastrophic biological damage.
Tech Titans have us addicted to devices they claimed were safe because these devices, especially 5G, are the vital cornerstone for billionaire data miners and the surveillance state. Totalitarians use this technology to enforce obedience, and Big Data uses it to filch and monetize our information.
Here is the chicanery the FCC and Big Telecom use to con us into believing that our cell phones and wireless devices are safe, for adults and children: The FCC, other governments around the world and Big Telecom use a crash dummy named SAM (Specific Anthropomorphic Mannequin). They fill SAM’s plastic head with liquid to test 5G safety.
Think carefully about why anybody would refuse to do such a comparison. Would you not want to prove to the masses that this protocol if you like, is actually proven & effective? EWR
COVID-19 has reignited the vaccine debate world wide as significant portions of the population express their unwillingness or hesitancy to take the experimental vaccine. A vaccine that was developed in record time with rolled back regulations, limited oversight, as well as a limited scope in the safety trials. The vaccine manufacturers conducting the trials and carefully screened potential volunteers. Carefully selecting candidates to help them ensure a passing grade for government regulators and then mass distribution. In this interview, Spiro is joined by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler who recently co-authored a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. A study the CDC has refused to perform despite four different congressional bills which would have obligated them to conduct. All four bills failed. The fact that all four bills failed may not come as a surprise, considering Big Pharma is the largest lobby in DC. But the key findings of the study, may indeed surprise you. The study was independently conducted, peer reviewed and publicly funded. Show Notes: https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/…
I noted the other day mainstream saying that in NZ children will not be injected (yet) with this experimental vaccine that has only been approved for emergency use. Last November it was said they’d be first. So we have in this UK article 300 children aged 6-17 to be injected in trials of the Oxford/AstraZeneca vax when clearly from the evidence there are side effects, some very serious ones. (They have skipped the animal testing because the vaccine was developed in less than twelve months… a process that can normally take from 7-10 years.. video at 4min.56). These are documented on the data bases. (See here also re true numbers). My question is, how does one obtain a 6 YO volunteer? We cannot vote until 16+ allowing variations for different countries. One can only assume that the parent who has legal authority over the child is giving their consent to volunteer their child. Have those parents been given the full disclosure of possible side effects? One would hope so. Who is even stopping amidst this frenzy to even look at those?
Criticized, but he is not as MS would have you believe, alone in his convictions. There are many MDs standing against the extreme measures the official narrative is demanding. Declining administering an experimental vaccine is surely up to the conscience of the Dr concerned who in this case is taking his oath seriously. In my opinion anyway. EWR
Environmental Health Trust
UK Column
Spiro Skouras
