Tag Archives: Experimental mRNA injection

Jacinda Ardern’s Legacy of National Division and Excessive Use of Power (Hatchard)

New Zealand’s Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern has resigned after months of rumours. Ardern, whose popularity has plummeted during the last six months, told us “she had nothing left in the tank”.

The backstory to this resignation is a tale of woe. Ardern said she wants to be remembered as someone who tried to be kind. The subtext is: the country is in an unprecedented mess but don’t blame me.

Last year school attendance was reported as running at just 67% on any given day. Machete wielding teenagers are ram raiding liquor outlets, vape shops, dairies, and jewelry stores daily in a frenzied crime wave. The health system is overwhelmed. Ardern’s government promised to build 100,000 new homes over three years. It has delivered just 1500 to date.

Our tourist, farming, and hospitality industries have not recovered from lockdowns and border closures. It now takes weeks to get a visa to visit New Zealand (it used to take two days) and the government says it only wants rich people to come. No wonder, we are all poor now.

Ardern famously insisted on universal Covid vaccination mandates. There is a suspicion that our 90% vaccination rate has left everyone in a lethargic fog. Excess all cause deaths are still running 15% above the long term trends, and it is not Covid.

History will judge Ardern harshly, but don’t blame her alone. This was a Parliament who woke up on all sides of the house to the weakness of our constitutional arrangements (there are none worth the name). The Bill of Rights was tossed aside, and no one in Parliament cared.

The leader of the National opposition Chris Luxon famously said pre-pandemic if he was in power, he would withdraw benefits from unvaccinated single mothers. David Seymour, leader of the ACT party wrote on his FB those losing their jobs through vaccine mandates only had themselves to blame. Labour’s coalition partners, the Greens, led by example, encouraging mothers in labour to ride to hospital on a bicycle (yes they did).

Politicians of all parties were afraid to meet protestors and turned the hoses on them rather than listen to their concerns.

Revelations this week (here and here) that Ardern personally overruled her scientific advisors who were expressing doubts about the safety of Covid vaccines for young people and the wisdom of mandates, have circulated very widely and no doubt this has further undermined confidence in the government.

Ardern introduced ‘rule by regulation’. Adopting the enabling model favoured by fascists in the 1930s, her government has empowered authorities to tell us all what to do, when to stay at home, and where not to go. The courts, the Human Rights Commission, and the broadcast regulators have all followed the government line meticulously which has had a devastating effect on business, families, communities, and professions. To cement her policies, Ardern introduced massive government funding of our media and broadcasters—a hallmark of repressive regimes.

Ardern was a protege of Tony Blair and a graduate of the Klaus Schwab World Economic Forum young leaders program. Both must shoulder some blame too. What fantasies of global power did they offer to a young person who was given to idealistic dreaming that segued into fanaticism?

Ardern’s government, in an absurd overreach, has also funded a nationwide effort to discredit critics of policy, labelling them terrorists. This has divided a formerly egalitarian society, instituting a snitch culture that encourages us to dob in a neighbour. Government Disinformation Project employees appeared on funded films aired on television to a backdrop of atomic bombs exploding and Nazi stormtroopers marching. Absurdly they labelled knitting, blond hair, braids, vaccine hesitancy, love of natural foods, Yoga, and yes motherhood as signs of terrorism that should be reported to the intelligence services (yes they did, view it here on TVNZ if you can stand watching this nasty piece of propaganda and hate).

Why did Ardern suddenly change overnight in August 2021 from being a kindly figure saying she would never mandate vaccines, to being one of the world’s most draconian proponents? We can only speculate. New Zealand is a member of the five eyes intelligence network. Given the Pentagon’s recently revealed massive involvement in US Covid policy and gain of function research funding, was she fed information that a bioweapon was in play? We will likely never know.

The cynical will say that Ardern left early like Key to avoid the ignominy of U-turns and election defeat. Leaving open the possibility of political rebirth. The New York Times wrote this morning that Ardern, like Helen Clark, is in line for a global role and a bigger platform. We live in dread.

For a couple of weeks now government announcements and advertisements encouraging vaccination and boosters have been conspicuously absent. Has the penny finally dropped? We doubt it. It will take an honest, intelligent politician (are there any left?) to roll back Ardern’s dictatorial powers and kickstart New Zealand. Why would any aspiring newby give up that much power? The prospect will be too intoxicating, but that is what it will take. Someone has to rise above the mire of our current politics and realise that governments should represent the interests of people. Leadership is about fulfilling the aspirations of your followers, not just telling them what to do.

Our final verdict: It is not Ardern, but the whole New Zealand Parliament elected in 2020 that will be judged as the worst in our short history as an independent island nation, formerly famous for championing the underdog and offering opportunity to all. Ardern’s resignation lights a bonfire of the excesses of modern democracy. To find a way ahead, at the very least, the New Zealand Bill of Rights needs to be entrenched beyond the reach of power hungry politicians and compliant courts.

SOURCE

Photo: hatchardreport.com

Breaking News: New Zealand Govt Report Admits You May Die or Fall Ill After Pfizer mRNA Vaccination … But Does Advise People Not to Worry

Time series analysis of New Zealand data supports a relationship between mRNA vaccination and death that is consistent with a German autopsy study.

On 14th December 2022, Medsafe (NZ Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Authority) released its 46th report into the safety of Covid vaccines entitled “Adverse events following immunisation with COVID-19 vaccines”. The report covered safety signals up to 30th November 2022.

This report contained new advice about the risk of death following mRNA vaccination. Medsafe’s assessment began as follows:

By chance, some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly. Therefore, part of our review process includes comparing natural death rates to observed death rates following vaccination, to determine if there are any specific trends or patterns that might indicate a vaccine safety concern.”

The report comes after months of speculation concerning record levels of excess all cause mortality in New Zealand affecting all ages, currently running at 15% above historical levels.

After dropping the bombshell news, Medsafe goes through an entirely bogus and unscientific process designed to reassure the public that there is nothing to worry about. Medsafe compares the number of deaths reported to CARM (Centre for Adverse Reactions Monitoring) within 21 days of vaccination to the background rate of deaths from natural causes. In doing so, it omits to mention (but does so elsewhere) that CARM reports are voluntary and massively underreported by an estimated factor of 20 times. As a result there is nothing at all reassuring about this safety report.

Are There Other Reasons to Be Concerned? Yes, Many:

1. Medsafe reports, “There have been no deaths reported for the Vaxzevria or Nuvaxovid vaccines.” So why are they happening after the Pfizer vaccine?

2. Autopsies are not routinely performed in New Zealand following deaths proximate to vaccination. A recently published German study Autopsy-based histopathological characterization of myocarditis after anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination reports 16% of deaths within 20 days of mRNA vaccination exhibit definitive causal symptoms of acute myocarditis, a known adverse effect of Pfizer Covid vaccination. So why is there no concerted effort here in NZ to investigate by routinely performing autopsies?

3. The Ministry of Health has consistently refused/omitted to record vaccine status on death certificates or make CARM reporting mandatory. This makes it very difficult to scientifically and reliably investigate any causal relationship between mRNA vaccination and death or serious illness. On the 17th December 2021 the director of the Covid immunisation programme wrote to me on behalf of Dr. Ashley Bloomfield, Director General of Health, saying “An accurate measurement of all adverse events is not required”.

In the light of today’s Medsafe admission, that’s damning. Incredibly Dr. Bloomfield has just been appointed the inaugural chair of a new public policy impact institute at the University of Auckland, proposing to translate and apply research into policies that directly impact communities—but he doesn’t subscribe to accuracy??? Most people do, especially academics.

4. Medsafe argues that temporal correlation between deaths and vaccination does not prove a causal relationship between them. They, along with epidemiologist Professor Michael Baker, suggest that Covid infection or pre-existing health conditions are more likely to be causally connected to deaths following vaccination. There are in fact other relevant analyses which can determine whether there is a relationship between mRNA vaccination and proximate deaths. Among these, powerful techniques of time series analysis can discover whether deaths are consistently occurring during specific intervals of time after vaccination. This would provide strong support for a causal relationship.

Among the world’s nations, New Zealand is in a unique position to undertake this sort of analysis. In 2021 New Zealand had very few Covid infections (almost none) but the majority of the population were vaccinated over a period of eight months. Therefore deaths recorded during much of 2021 in New Zealand cannot be ascribed to any effect of Covid infection.

Preliminary data from 2021 has been analysed to investigate the proposition that mRNA vaccination resulted in deaths. This shows there is a significant (p=0.045) relationship between number of vaccines administered by week and weekly deaths at a lag of one week. In other words, there is a statistically significant increased chance of dying within a few days of vaccination. Download the study here. Despite the preliminary nature of the data in this study, the findings of this study are consistent with the findings of German autopsies. Therefore there should be more rigorous study of stored data to further test these findings

There are other simple methods to analyse death data. For example taking the date of inoculation for each individual as a notional point in time around which all death data can be assessed for entire cohorts of individuals. This would reveal whether death rates before and after inoculation differ.

5. The time series analysis does not preclude the possibility that other deaths at longer time intervals after an inoculation date may be occurring as a result of mRNA vaccination. Unprecedented rates of all cause mortality suggest this is likely to be the case. Unfortunately, the New Zealand Ministry of Health is not releasing data on causes of hospitalisation by category of illness. There is evidence we have previously reported based on US defence personal data and insurance statistics, and on UK ONS data, indicating that incidence of neurological disorders, cancers, cardiac events, and strokes have increased.

Medsafe’s position on vaccine safety has clearly shifted during the two months since it last published a safety report, but has it realised the importance of more reliable causal assessments? Apparently not. The NZ public is being kept in the dark about vaccine safety as it has been for the last two years. Bland assurances of safety continue without foundation in fact.

Can mRNA Vaccination Be a Trigger Event for Death if You Are Already Sick or Elderly?

The wording of the December 14th Medsafe warning is strange and ambiguous: “..some people will experience new illnesses or die from a pre-existing condition shortly after vaccination, especially if they are elderly”. So are the elderly especially liable to die after vaccination because of vaccination or because they are elderly? We aren’t told.

Aside from the obviously elevated rates of excess all cause deaths, anecdotal reports from rest home staff suggest this is the case. Emergency vehicles and helicopters are answering more frequent calls. Hospitals are overwhelmed and unable to cope. Whistleblowers among nurses are talking about overflowing cardiac wards. A top UK cardiologist has suggested that the evidence of harm is overwhelming and irrefutable. Funeral home workers in New Zealand and overseas have spoken publicly about strange rubbery clots in arteries which have been confirmed by experienced pathologists in the USA. Statistically improbable increases in life insurance claims data have been noted. Sudden unexplained deaths have a high profile in the media. The message is consistent—something unprecedented and very concerning is going on.

Despite having multiple sources of data and methods of analysis available to it. Medsafe has relied for two years on a single obviously flawed method of comparing CARM data to background rates, despite admitting CARM data is underreported. How strange is that? This deficiency is fatal to Medsafe’s claims of safety. It is scientifically unjustifiable and it wouldn’t meet publication criteria.

There is no possible justification for omitting to use more reliable forms of causal investigation. Medsafe has avoided public accountability by refusing to debate the issues publicly, omitting publication of key health data, massaging published data, and unforgivably accusing critics of spreading disinformation. These approaches are worthy of a dictatorship but not a modern democracy.

https://hatchardreport.com/breaking-news-new-zealand-government-report-admits-you-may-die-or-fall-ill-after-pfizer-mrna-vaccination-but-advises-people-not-to-worry/

Photo: pixabay.com

NZ Court has ruled guardianship of Baby Will to the authorities

The NZ Herald reports on the judge’s ruling … “…the safety of the vaccine has been proven medically and by the courts”.

This outcome is sad & disturbing, yet unsurprising … a precedent is being set…

LINK TO THE ARTICLE HERE:

Baby blood donor vaccine battle: Judge rules in favour of Te Whatu Ora, child placed under court’s guardianship for surgery

For background story & further independent updates go here

WHAT YOU CAN DO: Voices for Freedom Updates on the Info & Recommendations for Action
You could also consider contacting Herald and asking them to publish the peer reviewed studies proving the safety of the vaccine.

Note: Anyone who has the scientific research data illustrating that “the safety of the vaccine has been proven medically and by the courts” we would be very keen to see it. EWR

Photo: pixabay.com

Pfizer and Moderna to Investigate Their Own Vaccines for Myocarditis Risks

Note: it’s what corporations do …. with impunity. Watch The Corporation movie. EWR

From eclinik.net

Why is Big Pharma investigating their own covid vaccines for myocarditis side effects if the vaccines were already supposedly tested and proven safe and effective?

Both Pfizer and Moderna have announced that they will be undertaking studies to determine the longer term risks of Myocarditis (an inflammatory condition of the heart which can lead to death) for people who have been injected with the mRNA based covid vaccines.  The decision comes after the release of multiple medical studies which show a correlation and causation between the vaccines and an exponential increase in heart problems, specifically among men 40 years old and younger.  Only a year ago the link between covid vaccinations and myocarditis was widely denied. 

Studies also show that myocarditis risk increases with the number of boosters a person has taken.

READ AT THE LINK

https://eclinik.net/pfizer-and-moderna-to-investigate-their-own-vaccines-for-myocarditis-risks/

Photo: eclinik.net

The real Anthony Fauci (Pt 2)

View Part 2 at this link (Part 1 included)

DIED SUDDENLY | OFFICIAL TRAILER

https://rumble.com/v1q6ecx-died-suddenly-official-trailer.html

DIED SUDDENLY | OFFICIAL TRAILER

Streaming November 21st –

Why do we never believe them? For centuries, the global elite have broadcast their intentions to depopulate the world – even to the point of carving them into stone. And yet…we never seem to believe them. In this Stew Peters Network EXCLUSIVE, the award winning filmmakers behind WATCH THE WATER and THESE LITTLE ONES present the truth about the greatest ongoing mass genocide in human history.

Watch this NEW segment now at https://StewPeters.com

Photo: pixabay.com

In just the last three months, 53 performers have dropped dead, or keeled over, on stage

From Mark Crispin Miller

And how many performers can you remember ever doing anything like that before? … Me neither.

https://markcrispinmiller.substack.com/p/in-just-the-last-three-months-53?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

VIDEO AT THE LINK

https://www.bitchute.com/embed/XgPtJyqwWwpW/

RELATED:

114 medical professionals who “died suddenly”—in Russia

Photo: pixabay.com

The Real Anthony Fauci (Movie: 10 days free screening)

This movie is available to view free for what looks like 8 more days now. You will need to sign up with an email but access is immediate. Worth taking the time to watch in an era of so much deception going down.

VIEW AT THE LINK

https://www.therealanthonyfaucimovie.com

Here is another link, just arrived in my mailbox from londonreal.tv (Brian Rose)… I’m unsure if this has a time limit, I don’t think it does. EWR

https://freedomplatform.tv/the-real-anthony-fauci-the-movie/?utm_source=ActiveCampaign&utm_medium=email&utm_content=The+Real+Reason+Fauci+Is+Stepping+Down&utm_campaign=faucimovie_2022&vgo_ee=hukHq78F39IcXZcbSD9Wy1xdYws9rRuWc8QXMIdaRcs%3D

The global and local economy has slipped into a predatory frame of mind

hatchardreport.com

A Fatal Fascination With Pharmaceutical Interventions

Earlier this week Leighton Smith asked me if I thought the structure of society was breaking down. Before the week is through, the UK Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng is out after just 38 days in office (exit right). He suggested that the uber wealthy needed more money to manage and the common man a lot less in difficult times. The UK papers, both left, and right, have had a field day suggesting PM Liz Truss has lost her balance of mind.

Do I think the condition of society is terminal? No. It is wildly out of balance, completely polarised, and financially strapped, but these are still things that hopefully can be fixed. So why have they happened?

Consumers Can Switch to Bidets if They Are Unhappy

Yesterday I wandered glumly around my local supermarket, morosely looking at price tags. Toilet paper which pre-pandemic sold for $8.50 for 18 rolls, was now selling for $18.50 for 24 rolls. Despite the bigger package, you can’t disguise the fact that this is a wicked price increase of 63%. Callously a supermarket spokesperson joked New Zealand consumers can switch to bidets if they are unhappy.

This price increase, and many others like it (too many), is more a reflection of how corporations have come to regard customers than it is related to any underlying economic conditions. The global and local economy has slipped into a predatory frame of mind.

Economic decisions are taken by individuals. The current economic downturn implies that individual decision-makers have become more isolated from the needs of their fellows. Society is not a reality TV show where the winner takes all, the individual and social interest need to remain balanced. So how have we lost this perspective?

Mind-body Balance is Fundamental to Health

Balance of mind is supported by balance of body—balance of physiological processes. Loss of a balanced perspective involves a loss of physiological balance. Traditional systems of healthcare like Indian ayurveda, Chinese medicine, and many others regard balance as a fundamental of health. Ayurveda seeks to maintain physiological balance through herbal and other interventions. It identifies three fundamental components of physiological (and incidentally mental) balance: TransportTransformation, and Structure.

RNA, in one form or another, touches nearly everything in a cell. RNA carries out a broad range of functions, from translating genetic information into the molecular machines and structures of the cell to regulating the activity of genes during development, cellular differentiation, and changing environments.

Note these RNA responsibilities: TranslatingRegulating Activity, and Maintaining Structure. Which run exactly parallel to the ayurvedic components of balance.

You can see where this is going. Change the way the RNA works in our trillions of cells, and how much have you interfered with balance? Not just physiological balance, but crucially balance of mind. Body and mind are intimately connected; they are not separate but are two sides of one coin.

It is widely accepted that drugs affect mental processes, so why is it not routine to test the possible mental effects of novel medical interventions?

Consumption of Psychotropic Drugs Has Been Normalised Despite Questions About Safety

When a close friend was studying at Auckland University, they were asked to write an essay on the morality of drug use with reference to the philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Mill combined philosophy with economics. He believed that the individual is free to choose what makes them happy unless it interferes with social well-being. According to Mill’s philosophy, the question was asked whether individual drug taking was right or wrong.

My friend argued that individual drug taking should be considered a social ill because of the conditions under which drugs are supplied lead to a lot of undesirable effects on families and healthcare systems. The paper was awarded a low mark. Faculty expected that students would decide that drug taking was an acceptable individual choice.

This story had a happy ending, my friend appealed their mark which was raised on independent review. The bad taste in the mouth remained for me—we live in a society where the consumption of psychotropic drugs, both legal and illegal, has been normalised despite questions about safety.

In other words, mental and physiological balance has been put aside in favour of the superman philosophy. Any sign of trouble, dodge into a phone booth, pop a pill, and emerge ready to save the world. Naturally, our response to the pandemic had to be a pill or an injection. The fundamentals of health—diet, lifestyle, rest, exercise, and happiness had already been relegated to a distant second place by our fascination with all things pharmaceutical and even labelled conspiracy theories.

The Rush to Vaccinate Turned Out to Be a Fatal Mistake

According to medical orthodoxy, vaccination should have been an individual and social good, one of which Mill would have approved. However, mRNA injections involve a novel technology which resets fundamental physiological processes. Novel mRNA vaccines upset balance throughout the body, including our circulatory, reproductive, and respiratory systems. The blood-brain barrier and the placenta are breached, and the heart and mind are affected.

The solely pharmaceutical paradigm of health could be out of place in the adverse effect post-pandemic landscape. Those damaged by mRNA adverse reactions are facing an uphill struggle to source effective treatments and meaningful compensation. Reportedly some adverse effect sufferers are being offered additional risky experimental ‘remedies’.

In the USA, the drug Humira, an immune system suppressant sometimes used in the treatment of Crohn’s disease, has been offered to some. Humira’s label highlights the risk of serious infections leading to hospitalization or death, including TB, bacterial sepsis, invasive fungal infections and infections due to opportunistic pathogens. It also features cancers, notably lymphoma and hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma. Other warnings listed on Humira’s label include severe allergic reactions, hepatitis b reactivation, neurological reactions, blood reactions, worsening congestive heart failure and lupus-like syndrome—out of the frying pan into the fire.

Some of these adverse reactions sound depressingly similar to those which can follow mRNA vaccination. There is a reason for this. Humira belongs to a class of medicines called biologic drugs. It is made from a synthetic (bioengineered) antibody. It belongs to a group of medicines called ‘anti-TNF’ drugs or therapies. This is because it works by suppressing a protein in the body called TNF-alpha (tumour necrosis factor-alpha). Your body naturally produces TNF-alpha as part of its immune response, in order to help fight infections by temporarily causing inflammation in affected areas.

In other words, Humira takes over control of our natural immune response by blocking a key pathway in the chain of events which originates with the DNA to RNA transfer of information. Sound familiar? We need to exit from a biotechnology paradigm which seeks to re-engineer the relationship between our DNA and the immune system it orchestrates—a relationship we depend on every second of the day.

The ultimate sources of mental balance, of philanthropy, kindness, security, understanding, and happiness are no doubt tied to our bodily processes. If these are irreversibly altered, recovering from social polarisation might be difficult, but history records remarkable regeneration following great ups and downs. It is perhaps right to assume that such will eventually be the case.

However, if we are to secure our individual and collective future, we will need to wake up from our fatal fascination with an exclusively pharmaceutical dream of health—it is becoming a nightmare. We need Global Legislation Outlawing Biotechnology Experimentation—GLOBE. We have no desire to be lab rats or drug addicts.

SOURCE

https://hatchardreport.com/a-fatal-fascination-with-pharmaceutical-interventions/

Fire and Fury, or Short-Circuited Docu-Fizzer? Part 1: A fear-filtered failure to see the Freedom Forest for the Tumult of Tenacious Trees

By Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards

In this exposé, the documentary ‘Fire and Fury’ casts the ‘protagonists’ in the NZ Parliament Occupation, for a public trial by media via character assassination. The documentary, and accompanying articles produced by Stuff Circuit, were designed to inoculate its mainstream news audience, who were targeted for emotional hijacking by the film-makers using propaganda treatments, tactics and tools well-known to media, communication and propaganda scholars.

Former Māori Television news and current affairs editor, Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards, dismantles Stuff Circuit’s attempt to re-assert journalistic ‘cultural authority’, by showing the functions, forms and filters present in ideologically-driven elements of the propaganda film.

The propaganda film was intended as a mass inoculation of mainstream audiences to assist them to keep the faith in the Corona Cult. And to believe that members of their families, friends or folk at the firm who had supposedly fallen down the ‘conspiracy theory rabbit hole’ were being manipulated by a strategically aligned band of far-right protagonists plotting to de-stabilize New Zealand.

A social norm of conspiracy denialism — wherein news outlets, academia and government law enforcement do not properly investigate the big conspiracies — became a global cult phenomenon at the onset of the pandemic.This conspiracy denialism had taken hold since the aftermath of the JFK Assassination, and has become a new news genre: conspiraphobia.

He rejects Stuff Circuit’s spin that the Parliament Grounds Occupation failed to achieve any wins. Not only did the Occupiers open the door for the nation to talk about the impacts of the Corona Cult mandates. By meeting in one potent place, the Convoy Occupiers unlocked the door that every regime wishes to keep shut: a society comprised of parallel structures to which everyone is invited.


A recent New Zealand propaganda film titled, Fire and Fury, profiling some of key players at the three-week long anti-mandate Parliament Grounds Occupation in New Zealand — drew praise, terse criticism and mockery.

In her Fire and Fury ‘documentary’, seasoned reporter Paula Penfold and her producer/writerLouisa Cleave, and the director/editor Toby Longbottom sought to lay sole blame for the riotous end to the three-week New Zealand Parliament Occupation on some of the leaders, groups and influencers who had sizeable online followings.

Yet, the Police pursued a siege plan to retake the ‘Occupied Zone’, which included the surrounding streets, with the confidence that the media would not accurately report on the Crown’s Constabulary as the primary instigators of the violence on several key days, including the final termination day — as I showed in my eighth Wellington dispatch entitled, NZ Newsrooms Cover-up Police Breaches of Peace at Parliament Occupation.

READ AT THE LINK

https://snoopman.net.nz/2022/10/02/fire-and-fury-or-short-circuited-docu-fizzer-part-1-a-fear-filtered-failure-to-see-the-freedom-forest-for-the-tumult-of-tenacious-trees/

Speaking at the UN, NZ’s PM Ardern Has Called For A Global Censorship System

This is not a new idea. Ardern has been saying for a good while now, since the plandemic in particular, that she and her government are our single source of truth.

She is serious about that. At one point she even told Kiwis not to speak to their neighbours. This all of course flies in the face of community and caring and looks not unlike fascism … parading under the guise of protecting our physical health. No problem however with the rise in numbers of child suicides. That has been sorted however by changing the definition of suicide to ‘accidental death’. And no move towards investigating the rise in NZ’s all cause mortality rate or any possible correlation it may have with the jab rollout. Apart from a recent admission by NZ’s vaccine expert Helen Petousis Harris, that they perhaps didn’t warn us well enough of a possible Myocarditis risk. This also followed a coroner’s ruling that a New Zealander’s death one year ago was caused by the jab. That has been followed by a Bill in Parliament as I write, to tweak the requirements around coroners’ investigations as to ’cause of death’. They are overwhelmed it seems by the sheer numbers of deaths so appear to be attempting to fast track the process.

So Ardern, who is one of Schwab’s global leaders remember, speaks of a need to double down globally on censorship. The perceived need is to censor ‘disinformation’. Could that disinfo include uncomfortable truths like the plight of those who fell ill or died post jab? There were many of those there at the Parliament protest earlier in 2022, totally ignored … ‘kind’ Ardern declined to speak with any of them. Not one, and there were even Medical Doctors there speaking out. She did eventually show her face however, once the protest was disbanded.

It is a global reset the WEF want. By all appearances a dystopian world couched in the kindly terms of ‘being happy’ … but ‘owning nothing’.

Difficult to fathom really isn’t it? That they would actually expect us to see this as a good thing? Even Italy’s PM is resisting.


Below is an article on topic from zerohedge.com

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is the latest liberal leader to call for an international alliance to censor speech. Unsatisfied with the unprecedented corporate censorship of social media companies, leaders like Hillary Clinton have turned from private censorship to good old-fashioned state censorship. Speech regulation has become an article of faith on the left. Ardern used her speech this week to the United Nations General Assembly to call for censorship on a global scale.

Ardern lashed out at “disinformation” and called for a global coalition to control speech. After nodding toward free speech, she proceeded to lay out a plan for its demise through government regulation:

But what if that lie, told repeatedly, and across many platforms, prompts, inspires, or motivates others to take up arms. To threaten the security of others. To turn a blind eye to atrocities, or worse, to become complicit in them. What then?

This is no longer a hypothetical. The weapons of war have changed, they are upon us and require the same level of action and activity that we put into the weapons of old.

We recognized the threats that the old weapons created. We came together as communities to minimize these threats. We created international rules, norms and expectations. We never saw that as a threat to our individual liberties – rather, it was a preservation of them. The same must apply now as we take on these new challenges.

Ardern noted how extremists use speech to spread lies without noting that non-extremists use the same free speech to counter such views.   To answer her question on “how do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists” is that you convince people using the same free speech.  Instead, Ardern appears to want to silence those who have doubts.
While referring to a global censorship coalition as a “light-touch approach to disinformation,” Ardern revealed how sweeping such a system would likely be. She defended the need for such global censorship on having to combat those who question climate change and the need to stop “hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology.”

“After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble? How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists? How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld, when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?”

That is the same rationale used by authoritarian countries like China, Iran, and Russia to censor dissidents, minority groups, and political rivals.  What is “hateful” and “dangerous” is a fluid concept that government have historically used to silence critics or dissenters.
Ardern is the smiling face of the new generation of censors. At least the old generation of censors like the Iranians do not pretend to support free speech and openly admit that they are crushing dissent. The point is that we need to be equally on guard when censorship is pushed from the left with the best of motivations and the worst of means.
As the great civil libertarian Justice Louis Brandeis once said, “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”

LISTEN TO ARDERN’S SPEECH AT THE LINK BELOW

New Zealand – Prime Minister Addresses UN General Debate, 77th Session

SOURCE

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/new-zealand-prime-minister-calls-global-censorship-system

RELATED: (commentary on the speech, from Dan Bongino show, US)

One of most DISTURBING speeches I’ve ever heard from a politician

Header Photo: UN video screenshot

The Strange Case of the Gates Foundation, the US CDC, and Our NZ Health Data (How NZ cooperated with a global biotech vaccine experiment)

From hatchardreport.com

The record rates of excess all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated countries including New Zealand show that a disaster has expanded silently and spread rapidly fanned by biotechnology lobbying and government sponsored pandemic policies. How did this happen? (If you have heretofore closed your eyes and ears, mind or heart to the accumulating scientific evidence of Covid vaccine harm published in journals, but now you wish to catch up, you can reference this succinct review on substack).

The Gates Foundation, the CDC, and our NZ health data

On Tuesday 2nd November 2021, almost a year ago, there was a meeting of the New Zealand Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (CV-TAG) upon which the government relies for pandemic advice. The Chair of the group is Dr. Ian Town, Chief Science Advisor to the government. “There were nine members present including Dr. Petousis-Harris, a vaccinologist at the University of Auckland who also advises Pfizer (an obvious conflict of interest), plus eight officials from the Ministry of Health, and four other guests.”

Sitting in on the meeting as a guest was Mr. John Tait, an obstetrician, the interim director and Chief Medical Officer of Te Whata Ora—Health New Zealand which was soon to take over the entire health system of New Zealand, taking it out of the diversified control of District Health Boards and into the direct control of the Government.

The meeting was taking place just a few days after Jacinda Ardern with the full support of the Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (19 October minutes point 3.0) announced sweeping Covid vaccine mandates affecting private and public sectors with the intention of 100% compliance (it would eventually reach close to 95% of the eligible population, among the highest in the world). Ardern would soon publicly admit that the aim was to make life very difficult for anyone who refused vaccination.

Point 8.3 in the minutes of the 2nd Nov 2021 meeting released under an OIA request is entitled Research Extension: Establishing a foundation for monitoring the safety of Covid-19 vaccines using primary care data. It was approved that the University of Auckland be allowed to extend a research project to establish background rates of adverse events of special interest (AESI) of COVID-19 vaccines from hospital discharge data and enable a foundation for monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines using New Zealand primary care data.

The research project referred to is a partnership between the University of Auckland and the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) to monitor adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines around the world. Dr Petousis-Harris is co-director of GVDN which has been funded by the Gates Foundation and the US CDC.

The GVDN website says it is aiming to set up global surveillance infrastructure capable of responding to safety signals post-introduction of Covid-19 vaccines. This sounds like a laudable organisation intent on protecting public health, but.…

The other co-director of GVDN is US vaccine advocate Dr. Stephen Black emeritus professor University of Cincinnati, a pediatric infectious disease specialist. In an interview he paints a radically different picture of GVDN and indicates it is actually an organisation primarily aimed to fight vaccine hesitancy:

“While vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaccine communication have become global, the ability to respond to such concerns has remained largely fractured, without coordination between countries. This project is a game-changer. Through its scale, transparency, timeliness and open communication [???], it will contribute to vaccine confidence around the world.”

It is easy to appreciate what a prize access to New Zealand health data seemed to be for an organisation devoted to combating vaccine hesitancy and to their sponsors including the Gates Foundation and the US CDC. A remote nation with a team of five million people prepared to:

  • Close their borders completely to travel,
  • Use a single vaccine,
  • Coerce the entire population to be vaccinated
  • Collect centralised data from a universal healthcare system
  • Largely refuse vaccine exemptions
  • Seize any potential competing treatments such as ivermectin at customs.

What a contrast to the US, which has a diverse private healthcare system, a porous border, a wide range of treatments, a multiplicity of available vaccines, and a population with a tradition of freedom of medical choice.

Almost a year has gone by since GVDN was uniquely granted access to New Zealand’s primary health care data. Data that has not been made publicly available in our own country. Essential safety data that has been repeatedly requested by New Zealand researchers but remains hidden. During this time, our all cause mortality has risen to record levels close to 35% above seasonally adjusted historical trends but the New Zealand public has been given no comprehensive and accurate information about its cause by GVDN who have the data, despite its stated aim to respond to safety signals.

To establish the cause of the unprecedented rate of all cause mortality and the potential impact of vaccination on health, a researcher would need details of vaccination status and cause of death or hospital admission data broken down by age. In other words, the primary healthcare data that GVDN has access to.

Has GVDN gone largely quiet because the data shows that something has gone terribly wrong with vaccine safety?

The silence is deafening, few if any New Zealanders are aware that GVDN exists. The main source of public information is repeated government funded advertisements encouraging booster uptake along with fawning MSM articles. New Zealanders have been deliberately kept in the dark.

From the meagre information and bland safety assurances the government and MSM have publicised, it is hard to escape the notion that those with medical authority including establishment scientific bodies are happy for pandemic causal investigation to be either oversimplified for public consumption as solely the result of ‘Covid infection’ or remain largely out of the public domain.

There are some really big questions here. How much was the New Zealand government pandemic policy coordinated to suit the agenda of Pfizer, the Gates Foundation, and the US CDC? Ardern made an abrupt change between September 21st 2021 when she said there would be no penalties for the unvaccinated and October 11th 2021 when she introduced coercive mandates. What changed her mind? Was a decision taken in this period to view the New Zealand public as suitable participants in a global study?

The dangers are obvious. CV-TAG, the Ministry of Health, the government, and the University of Auckland handed over information vital for vaccine safety monitoring to an unregulated global body—GVDN—committed to eradicate vaccine hesitancy. Had the main players, including Ardern, began to aspire to leading roles in a naisant proto-global crusading medical decision-making structure?

It is startling how, in such an unregulated global organisation, the health and safety of national populations such as ours can begin to take a backseat. Had the offered carrot to become ‘a world leader in suppressing vaccine hesitancy and proving the efficacy and safety of novel biotechnology’ swayed minds to the extent that accepted standards of caution, medical ethics, and public safety could be fudged?

Just how far will the government and the medical establishment be prepared to go to sweep excess deaths data under the carpet?

This week the Justice Committee tabled a Coroners Amendment Bill for public consultation. The public has until Wednesday at the latest to make a submission here. Among its key provisions the Bill would make it clear that:

‘Coroners could record a cause of death as “unascertained natural causes” if they considered that the death was from natural causes and no further investigation was required under the Act’

In other words, coroners might be able to ease off in their traditional role to diligently pursue a cause of death. Yet any reliable mortality research requires that cause of death be made available as accurately as possible. Enabling coroners to record “unascertained natural causes” as a cause of death diminishes the availability of information vital for basic research on public health and vaccine safety.

At a time when dietary and environmental inputs and medical procedures are rapidly changing, it is essential that all possible efforts be made to ensure as much information be made available to researchers. Instead such access to the needed New Zealand health data has been quietly granted to GVDN, a global organisation with the avowed aim of tackling vaccine hesitancy.

Despite this, it remains true that deaths do not go away, they may at first be ignored, swept under the carpet, or labelled ‘unascertained’, but if excess mortality builds up, as it has, an unstoppable natural process to restore the balance of truth is set in motion. People care about their children, their families, and their loved ones. They don’t forget.

Any organisation which seeks to hide information will eventually be scrutinised. An accounting is inevitable. It may be postponed for a while, but the greater the contrived delay, the greater the perceived error.

How did those promoting mRNA vaccination get it so wrong?

Those who in November 2021 handed over New Zealand health data access were no doubt expecting a success story to unfold which would win themselves and New Zealand global plaudits and prestige. They got it wrong because they misunderstood the basic science and the safety issues of biotechnology (for more information watch my video The Pandemic of Biotechnology).

It is now clear that the toxicity of novel genetic material and its mobility were underestimated from the origin of the pandemic through to the rapid development of gene-based vaccines. More importantly, the complexity and hierarchy of genetic command and control systems in the physiology were misunderstood and oversimplified.

Certainly, it was realised that single genes do not have a single function. Genetic material and epigenetic partner structures are known to have multiple functions and to act in consort with other genes-based systems, but how many interlocking functions there are in the complexity of human physiology was radically underestimated.

Moreover, it was assumed that microbiological processes, which constantly clean up errors, foreign bodies, pathogens, and expended biomolecules, would be able to cope with injected genetic instructions and limit the extent of their influence in physiological and societal space, and over time. This assumption has proved to be in error.

The overly simplified theoretical understanding of mRNA action, and the very few experiments to assess this, were wholly inadequate to model actual in vivo processes and potential adverse effects. Moreover, negative outcomes were hidden. These have now become apparent as a result of the court-ordered release of Pfizer trial data. Data that has confirmed concerning deaths following vaccination.

What are the lessons?

Poorly-scienced public health ideas and commercial pressures have been hard at work. Naive biotech health expectations fueledm by public relations stories have played a role. Biotech vaccine innovation rapidly became a financial juggernaut whose profits exceeded commercial projections by at least ten fold. This attracted hot and greedy investment money, some of it shared by media ownership platforms. Access to New Zealand data became a prized target.

There is very little that commands respect or confidence in the pandemic response, and much to criticize. Missing in the rush to novel biomedical technology is a clear understanding of the roots of health. Our health is 99% determined by our diet, lifestyle, environment, the air we breathe, and above all by our mental equilibrium. Those in charge of New Zealand’s health chose to ignore these strong time-tested natural defenses as they enrolled us all, including our children, in a giant biotech experiment.

In a symbolic and very real way the pandemic is the beginning of the end for our medical systems, as we have known them. It was caused by all the inherent contradictions in our profit-orientated pharmaceutical/medical system, which allowed lax control of biotechnology research. Thinking that biotechnology can solve everything will always be remembered as an example of the hubris and greed of the human race. As a result we must become more respectful and more aware of the enormous complexity and protective efficiency of natural immunity and unmodified human genetics.

SOURCE

https://hatchardreport.com/the-strange-case-of-the-gates-foundation-the-us-cdc-and-our-nz-health-data/

Photo: hatchardreport.com

World Health Assembly & The Worrying Pandemic Preparedness Treaty 2024

From nzdsos.com

The International Health Regulation (2005) and the 75th World Health Assembly: Saved by Africa and BRICS Countries

Where We Are At – A Downward Trajectory

We are rapidly approaching the one-year anniversary of the infamous inflexion point that divided our nation. The government has now done a U-turn on the vaccine and mask mandates and it is likely, given the pressure on New Zealand businesses, the private sector will follow, saving many the agonising decision of whether to inject themselves yet again with an intervention that does not prevent covid but may damage the immune system and potentially cause irreparable harm.

Reports from the UK show that it is progressing along a trajectory of recovery, at least with respect to the pandemic and its unprecedented measures. The picture seems more mixed in the other commonwealth nations and the United States. Here in New Zealand the recovery curve appears stunted as much of the population still hasn’t broken its entrainment and is oblivious to what is unfolding in the world at large.

We have seen a single revealing inconsistency that may signify a shift in the prevailing narrative. The sudden flurry of unsubstantiated and callow “hit pieces” which have been directed at prominent members of a community in search of scientific truth seems out of place. So why is it happening now? This is perhaps a sign that somewhere the message is starting to penetrate the façade. It’s a strange phenomenon watching journalists sacrifice their professional standards and journalistic integrity in the pursuit of character assassination at any cost.

It’s a development that we have rarely seen in this country and it harbours the morbid stench of desperation.

The shallow, slanderous and vexatious attack directed at Dr Guy Hatchard has been a great disappointment and has once again confirmed that the media, irrespective of its shade, will only ask questions as long they remain within certain clearly demarcated boundaries. The brash and dismissive rhetoric of the offending organisation, while perhaps marketable, does little to answer important questions for the people of New Zealand. Its trademark tone and blunted lowbrow tenor are a poor substitute for the candid yet courteous discussions that once took place between inquiring minds engaged in the pursuit of truth.

Leveraging a Small International Concession at The World Health Assembly

While it is all too easy to focus on the downward trajectory of the last two years, it is at times important to reflect upon the small concessions that have been achieved as humanity pushes back against this leviathan.

In the weeks preceding the 75th World Health Assembly (22nd-28th of May 2022) NZDSOS wrote several articles placing the World Health Organisation (WHO) under the microscope and probing it’s funding mechanisms, agenda and prior indiscretions. Much of our discussion was focused on the pandemic preparedness treaty and the sweeping powers that could be granted to the WHO under its auspices.

The decision of the United States to advance the WHO agenda through its proposed amendments to the existing international health framework, the International Health Regulations (2005) brought a measure of urgency to the 75th World Health Assembly. In its submission the United States, proposed amendments to the following articles of IHR (2005). Articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59.

The proposed amendments carried a concerning common thread, in that they tended to confer a reduced consideration of the perspective of the affected state party in the event of a health emergency of international concern, placing them directly under the explicit guidance of the WHO. Given a little consideration, it easy to determine the mechanisms through which the proposed amendments might limit the autonomy and independence of signatory states.

Placing the affected state directly under the explicit guidance of the WHO.

Despite all of the build-up, the 75th World Assembly came and then went with little fanfare, an event without incident, conspicuous only in its absence from the reports of global media outlets. So, what was it that led to the muted reporting of such an important global event? The Washington Post had pre-framed the event with the expectation that it would be clouded by conspiracy theories, filtering its narrative through the tinted lens of partisan politics.

Certainly, concerns were raised about the competence of the WHO and the speed at which it is moving to consolidate its authority. It seems that these quite legitimate questions are being deterred through an orchestrated attempt to consign them to the realm of conspiracy theory. 

 While our western leaders did all they could to advance the agenda, the proposed amendments to IHR (2005) were opposed by Botswana speaking on behalf of 47 Afro nations. The African nations had reservations about the proposed amendments to IHR (2005), stating that the process should not be “fast tracked” and that any changes should be postponed and presented as part of a “wholistic package” at a later date. Malaysia and Iran also voiced reservations about the proposed amendments, while Russia and Brazil, of BRICS signalled an intention to leave the WHO.   

 It’s an important concession, as it has postponed the WHO’s rushed attempt to use its own chaotic pandemic response to consolidate its power. It has created breathing space and has provided a window of opportunity to raise awareness in preparation to oppose the more pervasive and definitive WHO pandemic preparedness treaty.

The Pandemic Preparedness treaty is currently in draft form and resides with an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB). It is anticipated that a progress report will be presented at the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023 and on the current timeline, the final outcome will be submitted for consideration at the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.

We have a window, so let’s use it wisely, keep applying pressure and work on the alternatives required to furnish a world that is more suited to supporting the aspirations of humanity.
#saveoursovereingty

SOURCE

https://nzdsos.com/2022/09/13/world-health-assembly-pandemic-treaty/

400 Doctors around the world have come together to sign a Declaration of an Intl Medical Crisis due to diseases & deaths

DECLARATION:

We, the medical doctors and scientists from all over the world, declare that there is an international medical crisis

READ AT THE LINK

https://tinyurl.com/zmutwupb

James Corbett on The Budding Biosecurity State

via TheLastAmericanVagabond.com: Joining me today is James Corbett, here to discuss the growing biosecurity state, how we got here, and what this inevitably leads to. As we review current events and discuss the varying perspectives surrounding this unprecedented time, we also highlight the many ways in which people are fighting back.

SHOW NOTES:
The Last American Vagabond

Japan grants 1st payment for death related to COVID vaccination

Heart attack coverage at Off-Guardian

Depopulation coverage at The Corbett Report

The Crisis of Scientism – #NewWorldNextWeek (depression research analysis)

What is the WHO? (links to swine flu hoax research)

How to Spin Gold From Straw (swine flu vaccine artificial demand creation)

BBC: Human species ‘may split in two’

All Your Climate Questions Answered in 60 SECONDS!!! – Questions For Corbett #085

Are There Limits to Growth? – Questions For Corbett #077

Meet Paul Ehrlich, Pseudoscience Charlatan

Filed in: InterviewsVideos
Tagged with: agenda 2030biosecurityclimate changedepopulationoverpopulation

READ & WATCH AT THE LINK

https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1738-james-corbett-on-the-budding-biosecurity-state/

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Tokelau resident Mahelino Patelesio: Under House Arrest for 11 Months & Counting

Nukunonu, Tokelau resident Mahelino Patelesio has been placed under house arrest for the last 11 months and there seems to be no end in sight. Mahelino and many others are restricted in every area of their life. He is not allowed to go anywhere. Not even allowed to go fishing.

His crime? Refusing the experimental mRNA CV injection.

READ MORE & WATCH AT THE LINK

https://truthwatchnz.is/cv-injection-nz/tokelau-resident-liz-gunn-interviews-mahelino-patelesio-under-house-arrest-for-11-months-counting-please-share

Photo: screenshot Freenz video

COVID is the #1 “adverse event” reported after “COVID vaccination”

Mark Crispin Miller

I realized today that I haven’t recently looked at the #1 reported adverse event to VAERS…Guess what it is?

https://jessicar.substack.com/p/i-realized-today-that-i-havent-recently

Jessica Rose

You get one hint. It’s ironic.

For those of you who don’t know, VAERS can be downloaded for analysis from here, and the SYMPTOM file contains up to 15 different reported adverse events (AEs) per VAERS_ID. Typically, 5 symptoms (or AEs) are reported per VAERS_ID.

Below is a Table that show the top 80 AE entries in each respective SYMPTOM column. I don’t know why I chose 80. No reason. I highlighted some alarming AEs in red. Also, no specific reason for picking them.

Click on the link above for the rest.

Photo: pixabay.com

Other News

So now they are going to use mRNA tech to cure those mysterious heart attacks

How the US FDA, NIH & CDC use Gilead’s Remdesivir

Investigation: U.S. D.O.D. issued contract for ‘Covid-19 Research’, three months before Covid was known to exist, to a company in Ukraine

Why some Kiwis won’t take the jab

Those PCR swabs (here) and (here)

Other News

Shanghai Descends into Chaos: What is happening in Shanghai should be a wake up call to everyone to start preparing for what is coming next

More on the snake venom

Why some of us don’t trust Pfizer

…(And NZ Police have declined to investigate the contents of their Comirnaty VX)

The graphene again

Those (NZ) claims even Pfizer don’t make about their VX safety

NOTE: The majority of our health, CV, VX related posts are now found at truthwatchnz.is … all recent posts can be found there at ‘featured’ (main menu, top of page) … EWR

Photo: pixabay.com

UK Gov. publishes data confirming the Fully Vaccinated accounted for 92% of all Covid-19 Deaths in March

But, but … I thought the VX would save us from the grave? ……EWR


Official data published by the UK Health Security Agency confirms the fully vaccinated population accounted for a shocking 92% of all Covid-19 deaths across England throughout March,but what’s even more shocking is that 82% of those deaths were among the triple vaccinated population.

READ AT THE LINK

https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/04/12/distracted-boris-kyiv-fully-vaccinated-92-percent-covid-deaths/

Photo: pixabay.com

NZ Police will not be investigating the Pfizer Comirnaty vial findings

NZDSOS.com: Despite evidence provided by NZDSOS and NZLSOS, the Police Commissioner’s office has fobbed us off.

Worldwide many thousands of deaths and vaccine injuries are linked to the use of Pfizer Comirnaty products. New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science (NZDSOS) has compelling laboratory microscopy evidence, outlining significant contamination of the Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty COVID- 19 Vaccine. In January 2022 NZDSOS and New Zealand Lawyers Speaking out with Science (NZLSOS) have requested an investigation by New Zealand Police. To date, no such investigation has occurred. The failure of the New Zealand Police to act is cause for significant concern. Contaminated vials of the Comirnaty and Pfizer-BioNTech injection have been analysed by four groups of independent scientists within New Zealand.


READ AT THE LINK:

Police Refuse to Investigate Pfizer Comirnaty Vial Findings

The NZ government has raised ‘refusal to engage in a dialogue’ to a modern art form (Hatchard)

New Zealand Takes the Fifth: 

“We are asking a lot of questions of our government, but not receiving many answers. Has Parliament decided to ‘take the fifth? The curious lack of public dialogue, the refusal to meet protestors, and Ardern’s famous dictum that ‘the government is your only source of truth’, all point in this direction.”

As you probably know, ‘taking the fifth’ is an American expression which refers to the fifth amendment of the US constitution. When asked a question you are allowed to remain silent if answering it will incriminate yourself.

People who ‘take the fifth’ in court are generally considered by the public to be guilty even if the court cannot muster enough evidence to obtain a conviction. They may even continue to profess their innocence outside the courtroom, but they will not be believed.

We are asking a lot of questions of our government, but not receiving many answers. Has Parliament decided to ‘take the fifth?

The curious lack of public dialogue, the refusal to meet protestors, and Ardern’s famous dictum that ‘the government is your only source of truth’, all point in this direction.

I would like to ask:

“When did the New Zealand government first receive the Pfizer Adverse effects report completed on 30th April 2021?”

The Victorian government has publicly admitted that they received it early on. Our government has remained silent. Among my follow up questions:

Considering the volume of adverse events and deaths following mRNA vaccination reported by Pfizer, why did you continue to tell the New Zealand public it was completely safe?

No doubt the NewZealand government will continue to try to avoid anything like a courtroom situation where two sides engage in a formal process to uncover the truth.

Instead, their public pronouncements will continue to profess righteous indignation and innocence, whilst painting their accusers with the broad brush of ignorance.

‘TAKING THE FIFTH’ HAS IN FACT BECOME A HABIT IN OUR COUNTRY.

The Broadcasting Standards Authority, the Advertising Standards Authority, the Media Council, and the Human Rights Commission, all of whom are supposed to take an independent stance, have deferred to the government and replied to complainants that government advice on vaccine safety should be taken at face value. Are they also taking the fifth?

Discrimination in the Workplace

The ‘consultative’ processes followed by government departments and private companies in order to ‘legally’ sack their unvaccinated employees also have a familiar ring.

Long scientific submissions by employees facing the loss of their profession and livelihood, are stamped ‘considered’ but not answered. This is quite sufficient to meet government guidelines, which essentially require them to listen, but do not require them to answer.

Will companies who implemented vaccine mandates be able to continue to operate them into the future with tacit government approval? A few public comments seem to point in that direction.

Moreover, some companies are pushing ahead with mandates despite the mild nature of omicron and the failure of mRNA vaccination to stop transmission, infection, and hospitalisation.

Will they ask prospective employees to reveal their vaccination status? Why would they want to do that? Perhaps because they have had a lot of hassle from the government over mandates and they won’t want to go through anything similar in the future.

Now this is an issue with important historical roots. Over the years, employees have won rights and legislation protecting them from discrimination in the workplace. This includes personal privacy of medical records and much more.

The new Covid legislation has had a particular effect on discrimination. Employers are being encouraged to discriminate and are being protected from sanctions for doing so. Nor are they required to explain themselves. They are able to take the fifth and kiss you goodbye.

We Have Reached a Watershed

Those of us who for months have been writing to MPs, mainstream media, GPs, scientists, academics, and watchdogs, are by now well aware that we are whistling in the wind.

I am told that most MPs have their inboxes set to divert correspondence to the spam folder if it contains the words vaccine or Covid. Are they taking the fifth safe within the safe walls of the beehive?

It won’t have escaped your notice that such a system allows for the abuse of power. In common with many other western powers, our government appears determined to push ahead into the future with a programme of mRNA vaccination, whatever the human cost of adverse effects.

It apparently intends to continue to pursue policies which economically and socially disadvantage a minority of our population whilst inflicting long term health risks on the majority.

This is a government that has raised ‘refusal to engage in a dialogue’ to a modern art form. To achieve this, they are funding mainstream media who promote one sided coverage that has little relation to the scientific debates about Covid continuing in scholarly journals.

Finally how can the court of public opinion pass judgement on our government now that they have taken the fifth? As a minimum there are two changes that need to be made:

  • The New Zealand Bill of Rights needs to be entrenched in a constitutional framework
  • Parliamentary privilege, which allows MPs to lie without consequence, needs to go.

Both the vaccinated and the unvaccinated are facing an uncertain future spiralling out of our control. There is less and less point in trying to dissuade people determined to continue down the road to a biotech medical disaster—they are taking the fifth.

Good advice would be prepare for a different future. Failures in education and healthcare will need to be redressed. Narrow specialisation has left many ‘experts’ blinkered to the point of willful ignorance of the wider implications and pitfalls of their advice, even to the exclusion of their own personal health and well-being.

Institutions need to promote a broader interdisciplinary academic focus, critical thinking including deductive and inductive methods, and a wide ranging analysis of historical parallels. Organising institutions that serve people, respect science, and promote self-healthcare should be our priority.

P.S. Stuff newspaper have replied to some of you, who wrote to complain about their recent ad hominem piece about myself, that I was given a ‘right of reply’, I wasn’t. Anything approaching a dialogue is increasingly out of character in our country. New Zealand has taken the fifth.

“Yesterday’s release “New data is confirming mRNA Covid vaccine deathssaid that MoH errors undercounting the New Zealand population were due to inaccuracies in the 2018 census, in fact, they appear to be primarily due to restricting population estimates to those who have recently used government health services. My apologies.”

Thank you for your continued support.

Guy Hatchard

SOURCE:

https://hatchardreport.com/

What’s really happening right now?

The globalist narrative continues….

  • The floods in Australia … Agenda 21/30 relocation to ‘smart cities’
  • the internet shutdown in Russia to eventually exclude international access … ie Russia only … eventually also where you live
  • those VX adverse reactions
  • WW3 but not as we might imagine …
  • “the revolution won’t be televised” …

From the Crow House …

LISTEN AT THIS LINK

AND RELATED… AT THIS LINK

James Corbett on the fake war news (from both sides), and the existential hazards of the zero-carbon fantasy

James Corbett on the fake war news (from both sides), and the existential hazards of the zero-carbon fantasy Mark Crispin Miller 04 Mar 2022 18:40 EST

WATCH AT THE LINK:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jrQ10Yj3nOFv/

Is the NZ Government Confused or Deliberately Misleading Us? (Hatchard)

“There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released. Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.” Hatchard Report
Yesterday there was a short article in the NZ Herald which discussed the release by the Ministry of Health of some data. The day before, writing in his column in the Northern Advocate, local opposition MP Dr Shane Reti reported that incidents of self harm among 10-14 year olds have increased by 30 percent since the arrival of Covid. 

Disturbing though this is, the response was also disturbing, Shane Reti was admonished for writing about the data which was provided to him by the Ministry of Health. According to the article, Dr Reti should have asked the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little first. The Northern Advocate and Dr Reti apologised for the ‘confusion’ this caused.

Covid-19 data is being hidden There is a lot of confusion around these days, not the least of which is the hiding of key data by the government and the obfuscation by mainstream media of what little data is released.

Aside from the very disturbing impact of pandemic regulations on child mental health, what I also found interesting was the fact that the Ministry of Health was able to supply Dr. Reti with specific information about how the incidence of a single condition has changed since the pandemic began. It is surprising how the incidence of other conditions has not also been released for public scrutiny such as for example the incidence of heart disease and cardiac events. Well never mind, we are getting used to living in a secretive totalitarian state.

Yesterday our courts were also pondering the paucity of information released and its misleading character—some doctors and teachers were asking for a relaxing of Covid-19 mRNA vaccination mandates. Following the press coverage, it seems that the arguments being debated have already been decided by mainstream media for us.

The arguments are really very simple and the ‘facts’ are equally so. A tsunami of adverse effects Medsafe has published a summary of 53,000 adverse effects reported to them following Covid-19 vaccination. This is a per capita rate 30 times larger than that of any previous vaccination programme, and Medsafe itself admits that adverse effects are grossly underreported and uses the figure 95% unreported.

Now correct me if I’m wrong, but if I was in Medsafe or in politics I would be wanting to investigate this alarming figure more thoroughly. Given that a large percentage of our population are already affected and possibly at risk in the future, I would look very closely not just at the reports themselves but also at the specific categories of risk that Pfizer itself has already flagged. This is a very long list, now publicly available.

https://hatchardreport.com/pfizer-vaccine-unknown-adverse-effects/

How would I do that? I would compile hospital admission data and GP visit data for these conditions. From Dr Shane Reti’s column, it appears that the Ministry of Health might have already done this, but they haven’t released the data and our politicians appear to be very worried that they might do so without first asking the permission of the Minister of Health Andrew Little. Very Little data has reached our ears.

I would also require an enhanced use of autopsy to determine if there were any unusual characteristics of deaths proximate to mRNA Covid vaccination similar to those reported overseas. These include preponderance of micro blood clotting, changes in character and viscosity of blood, and major organ damage.

READ MORE AT THE LINK

The Pfizer “vaccine” has only 1,291 side effects! (The clinical data a judge forced the FDA to release … it’s worse than you could possibly imagine)

Could this have anything—or everything—to do with the ongoing plague of “sudden deaths” now ravaging humanity worldwide?

Mark Crispin Miller

It’s (seemingly) a lucky thing for Pfizer—and all of its accomplices, including Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci (remember him?), nearly every state and national leader, and almost every journalist, both corporate and “alternative”—that Putin picked this moment to invade Ukraine.

A judge forced the FDA to release Pfizer’s clinical data and it’s worse than you can possibly imagine

Emerald Robinson

The FDA was forced by a judge to release clinical data on the COVID vaccines back in January and so 55,000 pages of documents were just released. The FDA had originally wanted to hide the data for 75 years and release it in 2096 because, of course, the FDA is basically engaged in a criminal conspiracy. The COVID vaccines should never have been approved. This was obvious from the very beginning when animal trials were skipped in the Trump Administration’s ill-fated “Operation War Speed.” And now it’s undeniably true. We have the clinical data, and it’s horrific.

Hiding out in one appendix is the clinical data for Pfizer’s vaccine — which lists 1,291 adverse side effects in alphabetical order. Let’s give you just the bad things that can happen to people who took the Pfizer vaccine that start with the letter “a” to enjoy:

READ AT THE LINK

The scale, diversity and structure of the anti-mandate/pro-freedom occupation at the NZ Parliament

Hornets❜ Nest Surrounded: Liberty Occupation, New Zealand Parliament

Wellington Dispatch No. 002
By Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards


The occupation of New Zealand’s Parliament Grounds in the capital city of Wellington and surrounding streets —which began at lunchtime on February 8th 2022 — appears to be growing into a bona-fide grass-roots peaceful uprising.

By Thursday 17 February, it was estimated there 10,000 people either occupying the grounds, or the surrounding streets and supporting the occupation while staying with friends, family or at accomodation in the city.

After sustaining repeated assaults from Police on Day 3 of their occupation, the New Zealand Liberty Movement’s presence swelled, as people came from all over the country, to ensure the numbers tipped the balance of power in favour of the occupation. The objective to pressure the NZ Government to drop the Covid-19 ‘vaccine’ mandates regime is primarily being actuated by their key bargaining chip: bad optics.

READ AT THE LINK:

https://snoopman.net.nz/2022/02/19/hornets%e2%9d%9c-nest-surrounded-liberty-occupation-new-zealand-parliament-wellington-dispatch-no-002/

THE REAL REASON THEY’RE DROPPING MANDATES: WHO wants countries to sign a new Covid-19 treaty that would override a country’s constitution when considered necessary

I saw the analogy drawn recently to the boa constrictor and how with each relax of its grip it then tightens even more. Knowing what we do about the agenda of the globalists this makes perfect sense. It was right there from the start, the promises by JA there would be no mandates. A year later? Mandates. Two weeks to flatten the curve. Two years later? Less freedoms. One thing is certain, you cannot trust a globalist. They lie with impunity. EWR

An easier read from thebuzz.nz: The WHO wants countries to sign a new Covid-19 treaty in only about 2 months. This treaty would have the “WHO Constitution” take precedence over a country’s constitution during natural disasters or pandemics. This would allow them to make their “guidelines” mandatory to the public of all countries who sign. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second highest donor to the WHO, after the US government. We know how this would end. Dr. Astrid Stuckelberge worked for the WHO for 20 years. She says that every country should send a public letter of protest to the WHO, saying that their people DO NOT accept a signature of their Minister of Health. WHO wants all countries to sign this letter before May 2022.

READ AT THE LINK: https://thebuzz.nz/world-health-organisation-wants-to-manage-pandemic-responses-over-riding-each-countrys-laws/

Read the full info on the treaty at thereisnopandemic.net:

BREAKING – EMERGENCY:  Dr. Astrid Stukelberger, PhD:  World Health Dictatorship by Treaty to replace the Constitutions of the Nations (20 February 2022)

TRANSCRIPT

The following is a transcript made on Wednesday, 23 February 2022, between 5h56 am and 3h31 pm of Dr. Astrid Stukelberger giving her main presentation of about 24 minutes’ length.  The video panel discussion continues but has not been transcribed.  Some of Dr. Stukelberger’s comments may need clarification.

READ / LISTEN AT THE LINK:

ABOUT THE TREATY:

An international treaty on pandemic prevention and preparedness

World Health Assembly agrees to launch negotiations for an agreement to fight pandemics

On 1 December 2021, the 194 members of the World Health Organization (WHO) reached consensus to kickstart the process to draft and negotiate a convention, agreement or other international instrument under the Constitution of the World Health Organization to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

An intergovernmental negotiating body will now be constituted and hold its first meeting by 1 March 2022 (to agree on ways of working and timelines) and its second by 1 August 2022 (to discuss progress on a working draft). It will then deliver a progress report to the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023, with the aim to adopt the instrument by 2024.

READ AT THE LINK

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/policies/coronavirus/pandemic-treaty/

NZ Human Rights Commission: “It’s clear that the protesters who I have met with have very real stories of loss & suffering … they feel broken & discarded due to the impact of Covid-19 health measures on their lives” (Hatchard Report)

Public Statement by Guy Hatchard Ph.D. Following a meeting with the Chief Commissioner Paul Hunt of the NZ Human Rights Commission

23 February 2022

Dear Commissioner

Thank you for providing the opportunity to present to yourself and staff yesterday afternoon. I did so as an individual scientist but on the invitation of Voices For Freedom. I remain independent of groups, but maintain communication with many groups and colleagues on scientific issues.

I am not a protestor, nor do I have any history prior to the pandemic of publicly opposing vaccination. I am formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID).

I am a long standing advocate of the benefits and safety of those natural approaches to diet and medicine which have been adequately scientifically verified. I have my own website, HatchardReport.com.

At the conclusion of the meeting you said that the HRC would make a public statement and left the participants free to make public statements themselves. Thank you.

This morning I read your public statement following the meeting which affirms that you feel a duty to listen, and adduces “It’s clear that the protesters who I have met with have very real stories of loss and suffering. They feel broken and discarded due to the impact of Covid-19 health measures on their lives.” You also expressed a measure of caution.

As a person experienced in the analysis of data and the assessment of scientific information, I am increasingly aware of deficiencies in official NZ pandemic data and its use to support continuations of now outdated government policy. Outdated government policy and incomplete official data directly impacts the rights of individuals.

For example, since 21 August 2021, the Ministry of Health (MoH) has been publishing data related to the Covid outbreak in a cumulative fashion. This data shows that 60% of cases occur in the vaccinated (against a vaccinated population rate of 79%), and that 70% of hospitalisations are among the unvaccinated.

This appears to strongly support vaccination, however it is misleading due to the cumulative nature of the data, (and incidentally because of the way vaccination status is categorised). Cumulative data only reveals the average of the whole outbreak, not the current daily and weekly trends.

Since October 2021, members of my support team have been calculating ‘snapshots’ of data by subtracting report data from each subsequent report. This has allowed me to see the current burden of cases by vaccination status for any specific time period, and to calculate the hospitalisation risk disparity for cases by vaccination status. Below is an example of the data between February 17 and 18:

This snapshot data paints a very different and relevant picture. It is indicative that during the present phase of our Covid outbreak, those that are vaccinated may be at slightly higher risk of hospitalisation than those who are unvaccinated. The general trends and overseas data support this concern.

You will be well aware that this is in contrast to government and media messaging strongly encouraging booster vaccinations as essential. If you ignore the crucial issue of very high rates of adverse effects, this could possibly be supported by the historical cumulative Covid data, but it is certainly not supported by current data.

The reason for the ineffectiveness of mRNA vaccination must also be obvious to you from yesterday’s presentations and the supporting submissions provided to you by presenters. The characteristics of Omicron are quite different from those of Delta. Omicron is a variant that has adapted to prefer infection of vaccinated individuals. From the perspective of genomics, this results from the well documented path of viral evolution.

I note that Medsafe has admitted in small print on its website, generally unnoticed and uncommented by media, that the phenomenon of vaccine acquired immune deficiency (which I allude to above) is a risk about which they have concern.

The Human Rights implications of this are also obvious. Incentives and encouragement to vaccinate, when its benefit is in doubt, but the risk of harm is well documented, do not amount to a process of informed consent or medical risk mitigation. Today in your public statement you clearly extend personal sympathy to those affected by adverse vaccine reactions.

Many among the wider population are becoming aware of risks through personal experiences. For example a friend of mine is a director of a large business, one of his relatives has been affected by myocarditis, but his work colleagues remained sceptical of any risk.

Recently the father of one of their employees had a booster shot immediately followed by a massive heart attack. As a result, the opinion of his colleagues has swung back in full support of my friend’s informed choice. This kind of experience is reforming public opinion up and down the country (and even I have heard in Parliament). It is no surprise that booster uptake has barely reached 50% of those eligible.

I come to the point of my writing, in addition to a big thank you for taking the time to listen at length, I submit that the human rights abuses are a matter of daily misery for many, extending to some dramatic and devastating personal health impacts which are escalating as booster shots are rolled out. In my opinion, it is not tenable to delay action.

The government has curated extremes of public opinion fearful of Covid outcomes, in favour of experimental mRNA vaccination, and prejudiced against those reluctant to vaccinate. As you know, this has extended to punitive measures.

As published evidence has accumulated which points to increased health risks of vaccination and therefore a need to revise policy, the government has dug its heels in and doubled down on announcements of vaccine safety and effectiveness. The Ministry of Health’s restricted presentation of data along with its refusal to institute mandatory reporting of adverse effects verges on the deliberately misleading and implies a cover up.

I surmise from your extensive history of supporting human rights, that you will know there is a fine line between unfortunate mistakes and deliberate suppression of fact. I believe that line is now being crossed in New Zealand.

Leadership in this situation involves a willingness to speak up, even if the message may be unwelcome, and a capacity to change direction. Every day that passes by without action means growing economic misery and exclusion for some and crucially some serious health incidents for others. There is an imperative for the Commission to stand up and say unequivocally there is a case which has been made and needs to be answered. A case that requires an open public dialogue.

Therefore I warmly welcome your statement:

The job given to the Human Rights Commission, Te Kāhui Tika Tangata, by Parliament is to listen, conciliate, educate and advance human rights and responsibilities for all”

I am asking you here to follow this statement with a timely call for a wider public process that will go beyond a possibly poorly informed, and certainly based on past experience, opaque review confined within the corridors of parliamentary power. The HRC is there to protect and uphold rights independently from parliament.

As I indicated in my submission, incidence of adverse effects and death proximate to Covid vaccination in NZ and elsewhere have far surpassed thresholds set by medical ethics and protocol that should also trigger an immediate pause in vaccination. This is not a time to delay, the situation has already passed beyond a point requiring prompt action. Can you please advise me of the intended HRC time frame?

I will, as you have already indicated I may, make this statement publicly available.

I look forward to hearing more from the Commission shortly. I remain ready to provide any scientific information you need within a short time frame. As you know, I have already submitted to the HRC a list of 1000 published papers on adverse effects of mRNA vaccination.

Yours sincerely

Guy Hatchard PhD

For more information: HatchardReport.com

Major Chink in NZ Govt’s Armor as Police and Defense Force Mandates Ruled Unlawful

 

By Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards, 24 February 2022

A decision by a New Zealand High Court judge who ruled the vaccine mandates for NZ police and defense force staff were unlawful — is a major chink in the armor of the Government’s Covid Regime.

Justice Francis Cooke who acknowledged the complainants had the right to refuse a medical treatment and that their employment should not be threatened by such a refusal — also stated the mandatesbreached the Bill of Rights and were a coercive measure that infringed upon domestic and international law.


This decision, released Friday February 24 2022, comes amid an escalation in the Wellington District Police command’s siege strategy throughout this week. This siege strategy — which has seen the placement of several dozen half-tonne bollards to encircle the Freedom Occupation’s vehicles, supporting infrastructure and access points — was a provocative move to forestall the Ardern Government having to parlay with the Covid-mandate resistors.

This dispatch concludes that the position of the New Zealand Police is untenable, especially since they have been beating up, arresting and otherwise intimidating those awake Kiwis who made the effort to demonstrate as peacefully as they could in Wellington. Their resolve to peacefully protest — amid repeated unlawful provocations by the Constabulary — to end the vaccine mandates regime, is now vindicated by this High Court decision that the vaccine mandates imposed on the police and defense force are unlawful.

Steve ‘Snoopman’ Edwards points out the NZ Police, the Ardern Government and the Wellington Political Elite have lost their sanctimonious legal, political and moral high ground to claim the Freedom Occupiers have no legal right to camp at Parliament Grounds and the surrounding streets.

Given the High Court has ruled that the vaccine mandates imposed on the very forces the state can wield to remove the totalitarian resistors are actually unlawful, the Ardern Government, NZ Police and Wellington Political Elite should capitulate immediately —
and with great humility —admit they were wrong to breach New Zealanders’ rights to economic security.

Friday 24 February 2022: Ironically, a major chink in the armor of the New Zealand Government is the High Court decision of February 24 that quashed the vaccine mandates for police and defense force personnel, by deeming such coercion as ‘unlawful’.

In this crucial win for the anti-mandate occupiers at Parliament Grounds, Justice Francis Cooke acknowledged the complainants had the right to refuse a medical treatment and that their employment should not be threatened by such a refusal.

Suspended workers of the New Zealand Police and Defence Force who challenged the Covid-19 vaccine mandates in the High Court should now be able to return to work, said Justice Cooke.

Justice Cooke admitted that the vaccine mandates for police and defense forces were implemented to promote public confidence in those services, rather than to stop the spread of Covid-19. Justice Francis Cooke stated:

“In essence, the order mandating vaccinations for police and NZDF staff was imposed to ensure the continuity of the public services, and to promote public confidence in those services, rather than to stop the spread of Covid-19. Indeed health advice provided to the government was that further mandates were not required to restrict the spread of Covid-19. I am not satisfied that continuity of these services is materially advanced by the order.”

READ AT THE LINK

RELATED:

BREAKING: Vaccination Mandates for Soliders and Officers Illegal – Court rules in favour of NZDF and Police

Court Agrees It’s Time to Move On From Mandates

Covid-19: Judge overturns police and Defence Force vaccine mandate

Photo: By Pear285 – Own work, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=37848206