Tag Archives: efficacy

57 top scientists & doctors release shocking study on CV VXes & demand immediate stop to all VXes

From en-volve.com

A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts has released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programs. We urge you to read and share this damning report.

There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are pushing with all their might to get these experimental drugs into as many people as possible. The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are critical players in our ongoing effort to spread the truth.

You can read an advanced copy of this manuscript in preprint below. It has been prepared by nearly five dozen highly respected doctors, scientists, and public policy experts from across the globe to be urgently sent to world leaders as well as all who are associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation today.

READ MORE

https://en-volve.com/2021/05/08/57-top-scientists-and-doctors-release-shocking-study-on-covid-vaccines-and-demand-immediate-stop-to-all-vaccinations/?fbclid=IwAR1Ssrzc9ENt5wil6o1PA4ZzP0w-aD3xkqmpPGvQkLYHAEG8bSY9wCPVSMs

Photo: pixabay.com

Pathologist: FDA ‘Misled Public’ on Pfizer Vaccine Efficacy

In an amended reply to the FDA’s rejection of his concerns about Pfizer’s clinical trials, Dr. Sin Hang Lee says the FDA is glossing over potential risks of an mRNA vaccine while concealing its true efficacy.

By: Children’s Health Defense Team

Pfizer’s announcement in November 2020 that clinical trials showed its COVID-19 vaccine was “95% effective” prompted Dr. Sin Hang Lee, a Connecticut pathologist, to question Pfizer’s methodology and petition the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to require accurate counts of COVID-19 cases in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 mRNA vaccine trial before granting the vaccine Emergency Use Authorization (EAU).

As The Defender reported in November, Lee, who is director of Milford Molecular Diagnostics, said:

“Until an accurate count of COVID-19 cases in the vaccinated and placebo groups has been determined for vaccine efficacy evaluation, we are asking the FDA to stay its decision regarding the emergency use authorization for this vaccine.”

Lee’s request was rejected by the FDA on Dec. 11, the same day the agency approved Pfizer’s vaccine for emergency use. On Feb. 8, Lee filed an amended reply.

Here’s the sequence of events as they unfolded:

READ MORE

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/pathologist-fda-misled-public-on-pfizer-vaccine-efficacy/

With rollout imminent, a NZ ‘vaccine expert’ claims “there has not been a single death attributed to this [new CV] vaccine”

Apology & correction thanks to a reader: I had referred previously to Dr Petousis-Harris incorrectly as an immunologist. She is an expert in the subject of vaccinology (definition at the end of the article). EWR

NZ Herald reportsThe first batch of Covid-19 vaccine has arrived in New Zealand and will be given to front line workers from Saturday. The rest of the country will follow as more doses become available” Auckland University vaccines expert Dr Helen Petousis-Harris answers some of your most frequently asked questions.

“The Pfizer-BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine is very safe. It has been formally tested on more than 40,000 people…”

“Despite social media and YouTube posts, there has not been a single death attributed to this vaccine.”

Is the ‘esteemed’ expert relying on the (hitherto very reliable) ‘no correlation proven’ narrative with regard to this claim? For those of us who have been carefully reading & recording, of particular note the VAERS & CDC stats, and the 1100 plus deaths and thousands of (supposedly very rare) serious side effects to date (CDC figures) this claim leaves independent researchers with jaws dropped. Is death 25 minutes post vaccine still ‘no correlation’? I personally am stuck for words.

RELATED: Feedback on CV vax recipients includes death & some severe adverse reactions: read the VAERS vax injury database, a must see before making your informed decision

I will simply remind folk that this new vaccine was rolled out in less than twelve months when it normally takes 7-10 years. It is still in its experimental stages and has only been approved for emergency use. This one has been developed in less than 12 months, skipping the animal testing phase, and dubbed by Brian Hooker, a Biologist, Chemist at Simpson University (US) a ‘recipe for disaster’, (video at 4 min 56 sec).
https://tinyurl.com/sfakjvp0

Or… perhaps you the public are the ‘animals’ being tested
… in real time?

(PS I recommend you both listen to a lecture by Dr Simone Gold on topic, and search ‘covid vaccine deaths’ and ‘covid vaccine reactions’ in ‘categories’ at the left of the news page.) Note… if you search at Bitchute.com there are many smaller clips by Dr Gold. The above link is an hour long lecture.

Note: the term vaccinologist comes from the study of vaccinology:

“A nascent field of expertise related to the creation and deployment of vaccines; the field ‘borrows’ from epidemiology, immunology, infectious disease, pediatrics, preventive medicine, public health, virology”
American Heritage Medical Dictionary

OTHER RELATED ARTICLES:

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/for-those-still-deciding-about-the-new-non-mandatory-cv-vaccine-here-is-a-list-of-factors-to-consider/

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/04/some-pertinent-feedback-for-you-from-people-who-have-taken-the-covid-vaccine-for-which-clinical-trials-dont-finish-note-until-2023/

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/5-questions-to-ask-your-friends-who-plan-to-get-the-covid-vaccine/

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2021/02/19/hear-nz-lawyer-sue-grey-speak-on-informed-consent-your-legal-rights-around-vaccination/

EWR

Photo: Pixabay.com

Vaccinated Vs. Unvaccinated: The Study The CDC Refused To Do — Interview with Dr. Weiler

Think carefully about why anybody would refuse to do such a comparison. Would you not want to prove to the masses that this protocol if you like, is actually proven & effective? EWR

Spiro Skouras 167K subscribers

COVID-19 has reignited the vaccine debate world wide as significant portions of the population express their unwillingness or hesitancy to take the experimental vaccine. A vaccine that was developed in record time with rolled back regulations, limited oversight, as well as a limited scope in the safety trials. The vaccine manufacturers conducting the trials and carefully screened potential volunteers. Carefully selecting candidates to help them ensure a passing grade for government regulators and then mass distribution. In this interview, Spiro is joined by Dr. James Lyons-Weiler who recently co-authored a study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children. A study the CDC has refused to perform despite four different congressional bills which would have obligated them to conduct. All four bills failed. The fact that all four bills failed may not come as a surprise, considering Big Pharma is the largest lobby in DC. But the key findings of the study, may indeed surprise you. The study was independently conducted, peer reviewed and publicly funded. Show Notes: https://www.activistpost.com/2020/12/…

India, world’s 2nd most populous country denies Pfizer’s vaccine for use there due to lack of safety & efficacy evidence – America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) urging Biden’s admin to respond

February 5, 2021

Calls on Biden White House, CDC to Address India’s Pfizer COVID Vaccine-Safety Decision

Indian health regulator denies Pfizer’s vaccine for use in world’s second-most populous country

Los Angeles, CA – America’s Frontline Doctors (AFLDS) today released the following statement urging the Biden administration to immediately respond to the decision by Indian health officials to deny authorization for Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine based on a lack of safety and efficacy evidence, according to a Reuters report: “President Biden and his COVID-19 task force need to immediately and clearly explain to the American people why the Pfizer-BioNTech experimental vaccine is safe for Americans despite Indian drug regulators denying its emergency use based on concerns about potential side effects, immunogenicity, and other data. The burden of proof should fall on the Biden White House to provide Americans with greater transparency and information so that they can make informed decisions about their own healthcare. Science should guide this administration’s COVID response plan not public relations, polls, and politics.”

SOURCE: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/aflds-calls-on-biden-white-house-cdc-to-address-indias-pfizer-covid-vaccine-safety-decision/

Photo: Wikimedia (Parliament of India)

Pfizer and Moderna’s ‘95% Effective’ Vaccines — We Need More Details and the Raw Data

Peter Doshi outlines new concerns about the trustworthiness and meaningfulness of the reported efficacy results of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine trials.

Five weeks ago, when I raised questions about the results of Pfizer’s and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine trials, all that was in the public domain were the study protocols and a few press releases. Today, two journal publications and around 400 pages of summary data are available in the form of multiple reports presented by and to the FDA prior to the agency’s emergency authorization of each company’s mRNA vaccine. While some of the additional details are reassuring, some are not. Here I outline new concerns about the trustworthiness and meaningfulness of the reported efficacy results.

READ MORE

LINK: https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/peter-doshi-pfizer-moderna-vaccines-need-more-details-raw-data/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=80250690-f8fb-4ca4-bc65-f05c32d7521e

Image by Wilfried Pohnke from Pixabay

Doubts raised about effectiveness of HPV vaccines (Medical Journal)

Search for ‘gardasil’ in categories here (left of page) to find other articles on Gardasil. There are many that give injuries and deaths for this vaccine … EWR

From eurekalert.org

A new analysis of the clinical trials of HPV vaccines to prevent cervical cancer raises doubts about the vaccines’ effectiveness. The analysis, published by the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, assessed 12 published Phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled efficacy trials of the HPV vaccines Cervarix and Gardasil.

The analysis, carried out by researchers at Newcastle University and Queen Mary University of London, revealed many methodological problems in the design of the Phase 2 and 3 efficacy trials, leading to uncertainty regarding understanding the effectiveness of HPV vaccination.

The researchers found that the trials were not designed to detect cervical cancer, which takes decades to develop. Women in the trials were followed up for six years or less, apart from one trial extension to just under nine years. While the researchers found evidence that vaccination prevents low grade abnormal cell changes, they said this is not clinically important because no treatment is given.

Lead researcher Dr Claire Rees, of Queen Mary University of London, said: “Trials may have overestimated efficacy by combining high-grade cervical disease with low-grade cervical changes that occur more frequently but often resolve spontaneously without progressing. We found insufficient data to clearly conclude that HPV vaccine prevents the higher-grade abnormal cell changes that can eventually develop into cervical cancer.”

Dr Rees added: “Abnormal cell changes are likely to have been overdiagnosed in the trials because cervical cytology was conducted at 6-12 months rather than at the normal screening interval of 36 months. This, too, means that the trials may have overestimated the efficacy of the vaccine, again because some of the lesions would have regressed spontaneously.”

The researchers also found that the trial populations had limited relevance and validity for real world settings. The women in the trials were older than the target population.

Calling for women to still attend regular cervical screening, co-author of the study, Professor Allyson Pollock, of Newcastle University, said: “We have good evidence that cervical screening significantly reduces the risk of cervical cancer in women regardless of whether they have been vaccinated.”

https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2020-01/s-dra012120.php?fbclid=IwAR31FdTcv0lDCbkwUq_QAM2CTsNh7waF0TK_WbwdqJidIJiM4At4COfMoXU

How the safety and efficacy research was done for Gardasil – Dr Suzanne Humphries

66.5K subscribers

Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Polly Tommey go through the Gardasil inserts and explore how the safety and efficacy research was done and what the results were. Camera by Joshua Coleman and Anu Vaidya with editing by Joshua Coleman.

22 Must-see vaccine documentaries

 

Featured Image -- 18528

(NaturalNews) In no particular order, here are 22 highly informative, must-see vaccine documentaries that you could share with your friends.

They all have to do with various factors of vaccination – evidence, efficacy, injuries, health effects and medicinal politics.

(Article by Britney Murray, republished from NaturalBlaze.com)

They come with a brief description pulled from YouTube. Most of them are free and featured here in-full. Definitely add these to your “must see” list of documentary films.

http://www.naturalnews.com/2016-12-15-22-must-see-vaccine-documentaries.html