Tag Archives: Dr Coleen Boyle

The Two Scientists Who Gave Agent Orange the Safety Tick, Now Hold Top Positions Governing Vaccine Safety

This clearly reflects how untrustworthy the establishment really is. To place people in charge of the safety of vaccines, who scored zero in the safety & approval of a product that continues to this day to cause birth defects is totally reprehensible. Read the damning evidence in the article below. They cut short the time for the safety trials & approved it anyway. This is how glyphosate in Roundup got approved, a short enough period to show no serious effects. Typically also the authorities have dragged their feet on this one. NZ vets only got acknowledgment of the damages caused by Agent Orange in around 2007. Disgraceful. All that suffering. See the birth defects suffered by innocent children. These people who inflict such careless damage should be held to account.
EnvirowatchRangitikei

Photo: Spraying Agent Orange Wikipedia


Article by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

By James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D.  (Picture source: More on the CDC “Spider” here) Via The World Mercury Project

When historians write about the Vaccine Decades (1976–2020), there are two names that will live in infamy: Dr. Frank DeStefano, and Dr. Coleen Boyle.

Why Are the Same People Who Failed at Science on Agent Orange in Charge of Vaccine Safety and Developmental Disorders at the CDC?

In the 1980s, Congress mandated Agent Orange studies. Frank and Coleen ended the studies two years early, insuring that “no link” would be found between illnesses being reported by injured veterans and dioxin. The early termination of the study allowed the US Department of Veterans Affairs to deny any connection between Agent Orange and medical problems, preventing veterans and their families from qualifying for compensations. Here’s your hurt, what’s your hurry. The Boyle/Destefano team bamboozle was outed by Admiral Zumwalt who went to the President and laid out the science in a classified report (now declassified):

Without exception, the experts who reviewed the work of the Advisory Committee disagreed with its findings and further questioned the validity of the Advisory Committee’s review of studies on non — Hodgkin’s lymphomas .

a decision which should have been based on scientific data was reduced to vague impressions”

READ MORE

http://www.philosophers-stone.co.uk/?p=22793