Tag Archives: District Health Board

A NZ District Health Board initiates a one-off free meal scheme for port workers who take the covid-19 injection

From sunlive.co.nz


“The DHB approached us [foodhouse] to see if we were willing to partner with them and I just thought it was a good way to support a small businesses like ours and to encourage those front line staff so they have the vaccine.”

“It is to show appreciation for them doing what they’re doing, because it’s not an easy decision,” she says. “There’s a lot of unknowns about it. “It’s a scary thing for them to have to do and I’m appreciative of them and their decisions.”

The BOPDHB state that the food vouchers are a demonstration of hospitality and generosity to those workers currently being vaccinated.”

“…food vouchers are a demonstration of manaakitanga,” says BOPDHB incident controller Trevor Richardson.

“As Māori it is customary that hui are followed by a kai so, for our vaccinators and many port workers who are whānau Māori, this is not an unusual practice.”

“…Vaccinated workers can grab a large seafood chowder and some fried bread.” End Quote.

EWR comment: So a local government health department (DHB) initiates a scheme to encourage covid-19 injection uptake. “A scary thing to do” admits the food house.

Scary? Why?

Because as also admitted “there’s a lot of unknowns about it” (ie it is experimental, approved for emergency use, and untested). Pfizer’s own website acknowledges the long term safety data and proof of efficacy does not yet exist.

It will likely not be insured against. (Two insurance companies have been named as not insuring … ask your insurance company if they will insure you for any possible damages.) The government has excused Pfizer from any liability.

If it is so safe, then why did they need to?

There has been a death reported of a port worker already in this particular city, two days after receiving the Pfizer injection. Whilst the experts tell us there is no proof of correlation between the jabs and the so far 1500+ deaths & thousands of injuries reported, surely, no proof of a correlation cannot be taken as proof of safety can it? Below is comment about this by a NZ vaccinologist.

I am eagerly awaiting feedback by “experts reviewing the cases”. (I did ask the esteemed vaccinologist at the post about autopsies but no reply was forthcoming).

So clearly it would appear that people are under duress at the threat of losing their jobs if they ‘don’t comply’ with their employer’s demand to get the jab?

Listen to your rights around that here as explained by NZ Lawyer Sue Grey.

Our government has continued to assure us the jab will not be mandatory.



PHOTO: Wikipedia
By Pseudopanax at English Wikipedia – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=35020105

Animal Carcasses and 1080 Poison Baits Contaminate Waterways – District Health Board Responds Clyde Graf

From Tasmanian Times
he Graf Boys – Clyde & Steve Graf

Rural families all across New Zealand are being exposed to 1080 poison, and increased risks of bacteria from decomposing animal carcasses, in their drinking water. In August, two councillors from Waikato Regional Council presented concerns to the Waikato District Health Board’s Medical Officers of Health, after many community members were unwittingly drawing water that had 1080 poison bait dropped directly into it. The Department of Conservation, one of the government agencies that undertake aerial 1080 poisoning operations, failed to appropriately inform the local residents.

A video covering several different incidents includes testimony from a Hawkes Bay family explaining how they were exposed to the poison while walking through a local forest. When they visited their hospital they were informed there wasn’t much that could be done, as there was no test immediately available for 1080 poisoning.

When aerial operations are undertaken, poison bait is dropped directly into streams within the operational areas. Landcare Research states in their water testing protocol that “water samples taken within 8 hours of bait application are expected to provide the greatest likelihood of detecting any residual 1080.” One of the conditions set by the Medical Officer of Health is that the poison operator provide mitigation if it’s requested by household occupiers or managers of huts/camping grounds, until any water contamination is proved clear via water testing.