Tag Archives: decline

How to induce NZ’s so called ‘hesitant’

Back in mid 2020 ‘they’ were already figuring out how to induce you to take the untested experimental VX … EWR

From The Health Forum NZ @ Facebook

Yale University Clinical trials dated July 7, 2020, at the NZ govt website:

“This study tests different messages about vaccinating against COVID-19 once the vaccine becomes available. Participants are randomized to 1 of 12 arms, with one control arm and one baseline arm. We will compare the reported willingness to get a COVID-19 vaccine at 3 and 6 months of it becoming available…”

Some of the many options being tested include:
Not bravery message1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message which describes how firefighters, doctors, and front line medical workers are brave. Those who choose not to get vaccinated against COVID-19 are not brave.
Other: Guilt message1/15 of the sample will be assigned to this message. The message is about the danger that COVID-19 presents to the health of one’s family and community. The best way to protect them is by getting vaccinated and society must work together to get enough people vaccinated. Then it asks the participant to imagine the guilt they will feel if they don’t get vaccinated and spread the disease.

Other messages include:

“Other: Personal freedom message
Other: Economic freedom message
Other: Self-interest message
Other: Community interest message”

READ MORE:

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04460703

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Survey: Majority of Physicians Decline COVID Shots

From PR Newswire via mercola.com

Of the 700 physicians responding to an internet survey by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS), nearly 60% said they were not “fully vaccinated” against COVID, according to a press release from PR Newswire. 

This contradicts an American Medical Association claim — based on 300 respondents — that 96% of practicing physicians are fully vaccinated. Neither survey is representative of all U.S. physicians, but the AAPS survey shows that support among doctors for the COVID injection campaign is far from unanimous.

The AAPS survey also showed that more than half of physician respondents were aware of patients suffering a “significant adverse reaction.” Of the unvaccinated physicians, 80% said “I believe risk of shots exceeds risk of disease,” and 30% said, “I already had COVID.”

 “It is wrong to call a person who declines a shot an ‘anti-vaxxer,’ ” AAPS executive director Dr. Jane Orient said. “Virtually no physicians are ‘anti-antibiotics’ or ‘anti-surgery,’ whereas all are opposed to treatments that they think are unnecessary, more likely to harm than to benefit an individual patient, or inadequately tested.”

She went on to say that causality is not proven. “However,” she said, “many of these episodes might have resulted in a huge product liability or malpractice award if they had occurred after a new drug, but purveyors of these COVID products are protected against lawsuits.”

SOURCE: PR Newswire June 16, 2021

https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/archive/2021/07/04/survey-majority-of-physicians-decline-covid-shots.aspx

Photo: pixabay.com

One third of the world’s population are now indicating that they will NOT receive the CV VX-we only see the tip of the iceberg

From The Health Forum NZ @ fb

WE ONLY SEE THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG

One third of the Worlds population are now indicating that they will NOT receive the Covid-19 experimental injection.

This initiative (report below) examined the issue of “transparency” of both clinical trial data, and purchase agreements with governments.
Take home message….THERE IS NONE.

They reviewed 200 CV V contracts with governments around he world and found poor transparency and disturbing trend of governments censoring key details of their orders from drug companies.
Here in NZ we have the same situation of an extremely heavily censored and redacted document of the purchase agreements, accessed through Official Information Application.
Only 45% of all completed clinical trials have had their results announced…and of these 41% provided only top level results via press release or conference WITH FULL DATA NOT MADE AVAILABLE FOR MEDIA OR ACADEMIC REVIEWS.
Clinical trial protocols have only been release for a tiny 12% of the clinical trials. So even the 45% of trial data which has been released in some superficial way….the majority of the trials have not made the trial protocols visible to the public or scientists.
This is completely unprecedented behaviour.

This while our Government has the audacity to stand before us and tell us that we should ask no questions, and that the CV V is “safe and effective”

https://www.transparency.org/en/press/covid-19-vaccines-lack-of-transparency-trials-secretive-contracts-science-by-press-release-risk-success-of-global-response?fbclid=IwAR2ZG6AcseqpdxozT0cEblzNgcj02gSq4ZAMYFstz_YcvxrtQFE4LTdyGAY

Nearly 40% of Marines have declined Covid-19 vaccine

Washington (CNN)Nearly 40% of US Marines are declining Covid-19 vaccinations, according to data provided to CNN on Friday by the service, the first branch to disclose service-wide numbers on acceptance and declination. As of Thursday, approximately 75,500 Marines have received vaccines, including fully vaccinated and partially vaccinated service men and women. About 48,000 Marines have chosen not to receive vaccines, for a declination rate of 38.9%. CNN has reached out to the other services for acceptance and declination rates.

https://edition.cnn.com/2021/04/09/politics/marines-coronavirus-vaccines/index.html?fbclid=IwAR3jgbsDvtoVKkecjesQIekOkuFH-9XDFTuQpfsooVCBZs_AXi2HBPifNYQ

Photo: Wikipedia : By Dalton Swanbeck – https://www.dvidshub.net/image/5379812/kilo-company-blt-3-5-live-fire-range, CC0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=79128389

Will your insurance company cover you for any covid vaccine adverse reactions? (An update on the Southern Cross post)

Our post recently about Southern Cross life insurance cover has been pointed to by Martin Harris at Uncensored as misinformation.

Firstly, thanks to Martin for keeping us on our toes, and secondly, it is never my intention to mislead & I believe the source gave it in good faith. Apologies for any inconvenience it may have caused anyone.

Anyway, I have withdrawn the post pending any further info materializing. If you have approached your own insurance company and can offer us information about their response please share.
_________________________________________________________________

Below here is the response by Southern Cross to Uncensored inquiries. QUOTE:

Stephen Child, chief medical officer for Southern Cross Health Insurance has provided us [Uncensored] with an official statement.

-starts-

Southern Cross follows the recommendations of the Ministry of Health and Medsafe on the management of COVID-19, and the utilisation of any vaccinations. 

We would like to reassure our Health Insurance and Life Insurance policyholders that their policies will continue in the usual way and in no way be impacted if they receive a MedSafe approved COVID-19 vaccine.

In New Zealand, acute care is provided by the public health system so if treatment is needed urgently after receiving a vaccine, you should go directly to the Accident and Emergency unit at your nearest public hospital.

ACC also provides treatment and support to people if they have an adverse reaction to any vaccine if their criteria for treatment injury is met. This is why vaccine-related treatment injury is a standard exclusion in our Health Insurance plans.

Therefore, as is current practice, if you develop symptoms from the COVID-19 vaccine or any other Medsafe approved vaccine and require treatment, you can lodge a claim with ACC.

If you have any questions about the COVID-19 vaccine, please visit the COVID-19 website.” END QUOTE
_______________________________________________________________

With all due respect, personally I still fail to see in this statement any firm reassurance that any serious adverse reaction beyond standard reactions will be compensated for? In fact the reader is directed to ACC requirements.

The link regarding criteria does not work at Uncensored, however the info can be found at the ACC link here:

Highlighting … “A physical injury resulting from a vaccination, including the COVID-19 vaccine, may be covered if the criteria for treatment injury are met. Under ACC legislation, the injury must be clearly caused by the vaccination and must not be a necessary part or ordinary consequence of the treatment”.

_______________________________________________________________________

I invite you now to read what the NZ vaccine expert Helen Petousis-Harris has to say about proof of causation:

“Experts reviewing the cases”… are they reviewing them? Taking this to its logical conclusion, it has already been demonstrated that the thousands of deaths being recorded, with few exceptions, the vaccinations continue.

So to summarize this point, VAERS is the CDC’s site (US) for reporting any adverse reaction following a vaccination. (Note stats for post vaccine injury in NZ will apparently not be available until July). However as is stated an adverse reaction does not indicate causality.

FYI : Consider the following feedback from others’ experience (no apology that these are Facebook comments… social media is today’s ‘town square’).

Although anecdotal with no … no proof, consider them useful background information. Unfortunately independent inquiry is unwelcome and any narrative alternative to mainstream’s ‘safe & effective’ is written off as anti-vax.

The point of concern historically is that it has become very evident in the testimonies of the parents of children who have experienced adverse events following vaccination, that MDs seldom acknowledge vaccines as causative.

I invite you to visit the VAXXED Youtube channel and browse the testimonies. Time and again their plea that their very normal and healthy child only changed directly after the jab, is refuted. Watch this very old footage on topic (see comments also).

In returning to ACC’s statement that the injury must be acknowledged as clearly caused by the vaccine, you need to be taking into account with your decision to take the CV jab, the difficulty or otherwise of obtaining any confirmation of injury from the medical profession. Already a NZ woman interviewed by Peter Williams at Magic Talk Radio has described the hostility she faced from an ambulance attendant at any suggestion that her injury was caused by the covid vaccine. In addition she had to “self-report[ed] her reaction to CARM as her medical centre refused to.”

This, people, is what we are up against. A steadfast refusal for decades to acknowledge any causative link between a jab and a reaction, in spite of the official registers recording the reactions. Do you really think that with this new experimental treatment, it is going to be any different?

I note today that the NZ Herald has reported the death (first article) and ongoing investigation by Police of an Auckland woman (second article). The Herald mentioned just once toward the end of their article that this woman had received the covid vaccine the day before. (Update: the sentence with reference to the vaccine was then removed with no explanation given.)

Still, the mantra continues. “Vaccines are safe and effective.”

I challenge you to be very specific with your insurance provider as to if and what they will cover regarding adverse reactions to the new experimental covid injection.

Legal grounds for saying no to those vaccines – (from a Human rights lawyer)

via markcrispinmiller.com

Something to have printed on a laminated card, for your wallet, or however
you might want to carry it. From human rights lawyer Francis Boyle:

NOTICE!
By authority of the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation, I do hereby exercise my right to refuse to submit to or to administer the Covid-19 vaccine. The United States Government has prosecuted, convicted and executed Medical Doctors who have violated the Nuremberg Code on Medical Experimentation.  Aiders and abettors of Nuremberg Crimes are equally guilty and have also been prosecuted, convicted, and executed.
 
 
Francis A. Boyle
_______________________________________________________________________

Hers is how the fear porn writes it

https://www.thedailybeast.com/coffey-county-kansas-nurses-refuse-to-give-covid-19-vaccines

Kansas nurses refuse to give COVID-19 vaccines

https://nypost.com/2021/01/16/kansas-nurses-refuse-to-give-covid-19-vaccines/

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost.com/2021/01/16/kansas-nurses-refuse-to-give-covid-19-vaccines/amp/

How To Say No If COVID-19 Vaccination Becomes Mandatory

For those of us who believe vaccines to be unsafe and not properly tested, news coming out that plans are underway to mandate vaccination for COVID-19 is troubling.

Bill Gates, a man who everyone knows has the biggest financial stake in all this, has said that we won’t go back to normal until a vaccine has gotten out to the entire world.

Many world leaders are ready to follow Gates’ playbook, like Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau who stated, “Normality as it was before will not come back full-on until we get a vaccine for this.”

And now some officials on the ground, those who are directing the logistics of a vaccine rollout, are telling us how imminent these plans may be. Let’s listen to the words of Dr. Allison Arwady, the head of Chicago’s Public Health Department, who tells us “We’ve already bought the syringes, we already know where it’s going to happen…”:

READ MORE

LINK: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/04/no_author/freedom-advocate-explains-how-to-say-no-if-covid-19-vaccination-becomes-mandatory/

French vigilantes kept disabling speed cameras last week as new government figures confirmed that accidents went down with fewer speed cameras.

The revolt of French citizens against speed cameras resulted in a record number of speed cameras being destroyed or otherwise disabled in 2019. Government officials warned that the lack of automated ticketing would have a demonstrably negative impact on road safety. The latest official accident tally, however, recorded 3239 road fatalities in 2019 — a 0.3 percent reduction compared to the prior year, and an all-time low. Injury accidents declined 1.1 percent.

The attacks continued last week. On Sunday, vigilantes in Crest fired two rounds into the speed camera on the RD538 in Crest. The device had just been installed four days earlier. On Saturday, the speed camera in Fitou was set on fire. Yellow spraypaint blinded the speed camera on the ring road in Toulouse, with multiple cameras covered throughout the area on Wednesday. On January 26, the turret speed camera on the RD944 in Molosmes was cut down just three days after it had been installed. A speed camera site was replaced by an impromptu art exhibit last week on the RD13 near Velle-le-Chatel. The six-foot-tall “Rat d’Art” was put in place on January 25.

A copy of the 2019 road fatality report (in French) is available in a 1.5mb PDF file at the source link below.

Source: PDF File Road Accidents 2019 (Observatoire National Interministeriel de la Securite Routiere, France, 1/31/2020)

SOURCE

http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/68/6881.asp#source

A NZ heli-hunter of 47 years has observed that none of the once-prolific pre-1080-drop Kea are left in Hollyford & Clinton Vllys Fiordland

Note: Remember the convoy of Nature Conservancy’s international bankers that flew over Fiordland some time back? Where are they? We were told they were about recovering our Kākāpō and Takahē. EWR


“It is very disturbing to see this, as Kea were numerous in these catchments prior to the intensive poison drops in the Hollyford and Clinton catchments” … Dick Deaker

By Carol Sawyer

Heli-hunter Dick Deaker has written today:

“I got 14 deer yesterday morning, most in the Clinton Valley. We never saw a Kea!! And as you can see the gut bags ​from the deer we​ shot there 3 weeks ago are untouched! It is very disturbing to see this, as Kea were numerous in these catchments prior to the intensive poison drops in the Hollyford and Clinton catchments. And they are about to do them all again in the next couple of months!!!!”

Dick says none of the gut bags they have left in the last five years in the Clinton Valley have been touched since the poisonings started, and none in the Hollyford either since the first aerial 1080 drop there 20 months ago

Dick has been a helihunter in Fiordland for 47 years.

**************************************************

61286721_2363046543975658_4823716631001694208_n.jpg
Photo by Dick Deaker of untouched deer gut bags in the Clinton. The white is the fat, which Kea love. As you can see, it is all still there.

***************************************************

End note: The Kea, endemic to NZ, (i.e. not found elsewhere), is the world’s only truly Alpine parrot. It is omnivorous and eats a wide range of plant and animal matter, loving to scavenge carcasses. Consequently it is doubly at risk from aerial 1080 poisoning, eating the sweet 1080 poison cereal-baits and also scavenging on the poisoned carcasses, which causes secondary poisoning.


NOTE: If you are pro poisoning of the environment, EnvirowatchRangitikei is not really the forum to espouse your opinions.  Mainstream, where those views are already the status quo would be the place to air those. Nearly 70% of DoC’s studies justifying the use of 1080 poison were conducted in-house. This is a venue reserved for sharing the independent science that you won’t of course find there. To the public – feel free to read both & make up your own minds.

RELATED: TWO SCIENTISTS WHO REVIEWED MORE THAN 100 OF DOC’S SCIENTIFIC PAPERS SAY: “THERE’S NO CREDIBLE SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE SHOWING ANY SPECIES OF NATIVE BIRD BENEFITS FROM 1080 DROPS”

If you are new to the 1080 poisoning program, here is a good article to start with: WHY ARE PEOPLE SO CONCERNED ABOUT 1080? A must watch also is Poisoning Paradise, the doco made by the GrafBoys (banned from screening on NZ TV, yet a 4x international award winner). Their website is tv-wild.com. Their doco is a very comprehensive overview with the independent science to illustrate the question marks that remain over the use of this poison. There are links also on our 1080 resources page to most of the groups, pages, sites etc that will provide you with further information.

Check out the 1080 pages at the main menu, particularly the sub tab, ‘suspected 1080 poisoning cases’. Finally, remember what the retired MD Charlie Baycroft said recently …‘if you die from 1080 poisoning, nobody will know  because the Ministry of Health is bullying NZ Doctors into not testing for 1080′. 

 

Pesticides Linked to Declining Bee Populations Also Threaten Birds and Small Mammals

From organicconsumers.org

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that popular pesticides linked to declining bee populations also pose a threat to birds and, in some cases, small mammals and insects.

The EPA released preliminary scientific assessments of four chemicals from the neonicotinoid or “neonic” class of insecticides on Friday as part of an ongoing review that environmentalists and farmers are watching closely. Previous EPA assessments echoed research showing that neonics can harm the bees we rely on to pollinate crops when sprayed on cotton and certain fruits and vegetables.

“The EPA’s assessments confirm neonicotinoid pesticides are extremely harmful to birds and aquatic life at the very center of our ecosystems,” said Lori Ann Burd, director of the Center for Biological Diversity’s environmental health program, in a statement.

Environmentalists blame all four of the neonic pesticides under review at the EPA — clothianidin, thiamethoxam, dinotefuran and imidacloprid — for declining populations of honey bees, butterflies and other pollinators, including several endangered species. Of the four, imidacloprid is probably the most widely used and controversial.

In their most recent assessment, EPA scientists determined that imidacloprid poses an “acute risk” to birds when sprayed on crops. Birds, small mammals and insects could also be harmed if they eat crop seeds treated with the pesticide.

The findings echo a report published earlier this year that found imidacloprid and the controversial organophosphate pesticide chlorpyrifos can impair songbirds’ ability to find their way while migrating. Environmentalists are also concerned that the chemical may pose health risks to humans, including cancer and increased rates of autism in young children.

In 2016, the EPA also found that imidacloprid “potentially poses risk to [bee] hives when the pesticide comes in contact with certain crops that attract pollinators,” according to a preliminary assessment released at the time.