Tag Archives: Cover up

Ford spent $40 million to reshape asbestos science

From publicintegrity.org

Note: this article is from 2016. One or two of the links are dead however most are still live. There are many. EWR


In 2001, toxicologist Dennis Paustenbach got a phone call from a lawyer for Ford Motor Company.

About ‘Science for Sale’

Science and opinion have become increasingly conflated, in large part because of corporate influence. As we explain in “Science for Sale,” an investigative series by the Center for Public Integrity and co-published with Vice.com, industry-backed research has exploded — often with the aim of obscuring the truth — as government-funded science dwindles. Read more.

The lawyer, Darrell Grams, explained that Ford had been losing lawsuits filed by former auto mechanics alleging asbestos in brakes had given them mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer virtually always tied to asbestos exposure. Grams asked Paustenbach, then a vice president with the consulting firm Exponent, if he had any interest in studying the disease’s possible association with brake work. A meeting cemented the deal.

Paustenbach, a prolific author of scientific papers who’d worked with Grams on Dow Corning’s defense against silicone breast-implant illness claims, had barely looked at asbestos to that point. “I really started to get serious about studying asbestos after I met Mr. Grams, that’s for sure,” Paustenbach testified in a sworn deposition in June 2015. Before that, he said, the topic “wasn’t that interesting to me.”

Thus began a relationship that, according to recent depositions, has enriched Exponent by $18.2 million and brought another $21 million to Cardno ChemRisk, a similar firm Paustenbach founded in 1985, left and restarted in 2003. All told, testimony shows, Ford has spent nearly $40 million funding journal articles and expert testimony concluding there is no evidence brake mechanics are at increased risk of developing mesothelioma. This finding, repeated countless times in courtrooms and law offices over the past 15 years, is an attempt at scientific misdirection aimed at extricating Ford from lawsuits, critics say.

“They’ve published a lot, but they’ve really produced no new science,” said John Dement, a professor in Duke University’s Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine and an asbestos researcher for more than four decades. “Fifteen years ago, I thought the issue of asbestos risk assessment was pretty much defined. All they’ve accomplished is to try to generate doubt where, really, little doubt existed.”

The glut of corporate-financed science has yielded mixed results. Exponent had a role in jury trials won by Ford in St. Louis and Pittsburgh last year, for example, and in a trial Ford lost in Tennessee. Judges have noted the infusion of controversy into a subject that for many years was not controversial in the least. A veteran asbestos judge in Wayne County, Michigan, wrote in an opinion that he’d never encountered the argument that “the science was not there” on mesothelioma and brakes until he heard a case involving an Exponent witness.

The discord over brakes bankrolled by Ford “has, in certain cases, tipped the scales for the defendants with juries,” said plaintiffs’ lawyer Jon Ruckdeschel. “More frequently, it has been used by industry lawyers to increase the costs and burdens on the courts and sick mechanics by creating a tidal wave of pre-trial litigation regarding the ‘science.’ ”

A troubling history

Over the past decade 109 physicians, scientists and academics from 17 countries have signed legal briefs affirming that asbestos in brakes can cause mesothelioma. The World Health Organization and other research and regulatory bodies maintain that there is no safe exposure level for asbestos and that all forms of the mineral — including the most common one, chrysotile, found in brakes — can produce mesothelioma.

Worries about brakes as a source of disease go back decades. A 1971 Ford memo shows that while the company didn’t believe brake dust unleashed by mechanics contained significant amounts of asbestos, it already was exploring alternatives to asbestos brake linings. One of them, made of metal and carbon, performed well, the memo says, “but the cost penalty is severe ($1.25/car just for front-end brakes).”

A Ford spokeswoman declined to comment for this article. In its 2014 annual report, the company said, “Most of the asbestos litigation we face involves individuals who claim to have worked on the brakes of our vehicles over the years. We are prepared to defend these cases, and believe that the scientific evidence confirms our long-standing position that there is no increased risk of asbestos-related disease as a result of exposure to the type of asbestos formerly used in the brakes on our vehicles.” Ford announced recently that it earned a record pretax profit of $10.5 billion in 2015.

Dennis Paustenbach (ICIJ.org)

A written statement to the Center for Public Integrity delivered on behalf of Paustenbach by a public-relations firm says, “Dennis was viewed as one of the leading risk assessment experts in the country, and was contacted by Ford because of his experience and expertise in this field. … As Dennis and others learned more about brake dust, it was clear that while there was considerable data on the subject, the scientific information had never been synthesized and analyzed.”

His conclusion after reviewing the scientific literature, according to the statement: “There is no credible study that has shown an increased risk of disease in auto mechanics.”

An Exponent vice president declined to comment. On its website, the 49-year-old firm, originally known as Failure Analysis Associates, says, “We evaluate complex human health and environmental issues to find cost-effective solutions. … By introducing a new way of thinking about an existing situation, we assist clients to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles.”

A Center review of abstracts on the National Institutes of Health’s PubMed website turned up 10 articles on asbestos brakes co-authored by scientists affiliated with Exponent or Cardno ChemRisk since 2003. (The latter was known simply as ChemRisk until it was acquired by Brisbane, Australia-based Cardno in 2012). None of the articles reported an elevated risk of mesothelioma among vehicle mechanics.

Many physicians and scientists say, however, that these papers muddy the waters by drawing overly broad conclusions from earlier studies of workers who might have had no contact with asbestos brakes. “In the asbestos area the whole literature has been so warped by publications just supporting litigation,” said Dement, of Duke. “It has a real negative impact on pushing the science forward.” Dement said he has, on rare occasions, consulted for plaintiffs in the past 10 or 15 years, earmarking nearly all fees for the university.

In a 2007 article, two researchers at George Washington University — one of whom, David Michaels, now heads the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration — reported finding six “litigation-generated” papers on asbestos and auto mechanics published from 1997 through 2001. In the ensuing five years, 20 such papers were published. All told, 18 of the 26 papers published from 1997 through 2006 were “written by experts primarily associated with defendants, while eight were written by experts who work primarily for plaintiffs … Sponsorship by parties involved in litigation leads to an imbalance in the literature … whoever is willing to fund more studies will have more studies published.”

Craig Biegel, a retired corporate defense lawyer in Oregon who represented plaintiffs later in his career, did an update of the Michaels paper as part of his doctoral dissertation. Biegel searched the National Library of Medicine’s PubMed website using the words “asbestos” and “brake.” He found 27 articles written from 1998 to 2015 by experts known to work for industry; all, he said, showed either no elevated risk of mesothelioma among mechanics or minimal asbestos exposures.

He found 10 articles written by plaintiffs’ experts; all showed an association between the disease and brake work. And he found 11 articles written by foreign scientists, who, as far as he knew, were not involved in litigation. All but one showed an association or documented high asbestos exposures.

“As far as I’m concerned, both sides in a lawsuit do the same thing: They both fund research to obtain evidence for trial, not to advance science,” said Biegel, who once defended asbestos property-damage claims for a Fortune 500 company he declined to identify. “The only difference is that defense counsel have almost unlimited industry money and plaintiffs’ counsel do not want to spend their own money.”

Ford’s knowledge of asbestos

There are several ways microscopic asbestos fibers can be sent airborne and enter the human body during brake work. Over time, friction wears down brake linings and pads — many of which contained asbestos prior to the mid-1990s and some of which still do — and they need to be replaced. A mechanic who opened a brake drum would find it filled with fine dust from the decayed lining. The easiest and most common way to clean it out was to use compressed air, a technique that generates grayish, fiber-bearing clouds that can trigger disease years later if the worker is not properly protected. Many weren’t.

Other opportunities for exposure: filing, grinding or sanding brakes, or cleaning up work areas.

Ford wasn’t the only U.S. automaker to use asbestos brakes. General Motors and Chrysler did as well and found themselves in court as a result. Of the so-called Big Three, however, only Ford continues to get hit with mesothelioma lawsuits; GM and Chrysler are immune by virtue of their 2009 bankruptcies. “The extent of our financial exposure to asbestos litigation remains very difficult to estimate,” Ford said in its 2014 annual report. “Annual payout and defense costs may become significant in the future.”

Documents show Ford was mindful of concerns about asbestos brakes by the late 1960s. An unpublished report by an industrial hygienist with Ford of Britain in 1968 said that while brake linings at the time contained between 40 and 60 percent asbestos, field tests indicated dust that collected in brake drums had a low asbestos content because much of the material decomposed after repeated braking. Consequently, he wrote, there was no evidence that blowing out the drums presented a “significant hazard to health.”

The hygienist added, “It would be helpful, however, for clinical examinations to be made of some repair mechanics with long experience of brake cleaning to confirm this view. It would also be desirable to include in Service manuals a general instruction that inhalation of dust during brake cleaning should be minimised.”

A 1970 Ford memo titled “Asbestos Emissions from Brake Lining Wear” included a bibliography of 40 articles on the cancer-causing effects of asbestos, dating to 1954. And the same 1971 memo bemoaning the $1.25 cost of asbestos-free brakes noted that the state of Illinois was considering banning the use of asbestos in brake linings, beginning with the 1975 model year.

Labor Secretary Elizabeth Dole holds up a photo during a news conference in Washington, Thursday, July 27, 1989, showing alleged asbestos violations at the Friction Division Products Inc. plant in Trenton, New Jersey. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration had proposed fining the brake-shoe manufacturing company $2.7 million for exposing workers to potentially deadly levels of asbestos. Bob Daugherty/AP

In 1973, Ford began telling its own employees to use “an industrial type vacuum cleaner” to remove dust from brake drums. “Under no circumstances shall compressed air blowoff be used to clean brakes and brake drums,” the company said. It first told its dealers about what it called “a potential health hazard” in 1975.

In a court filing, Ford said it began putting “caution” labels on packages of asbestos-containing brakes and clutches in 1980; many mesothelioma victims who have sued the company say they never saw such labels. In the same document Ford said it began a “complete phase-out of asbestos-containing brake products” in the 1983 model year, starting with its Ranger pickup truck. A decade later, only Ford Mustangs and certain limousines were equipped with asbestos brakes; some asbestos-containing parts for older model-year vehicles were available until 2001through dealerships and authorized distributors.

That was the year lawyer Grams reached out to toxicologist Paustenbach to gauge his interest in studying mesothelioma in ex-mechanics. “I contacted Dr. Paustenbach because he is one of the leading professional experts in the world,” Grams, who no longer represents Ford, said in a brief phone interview. Grams said he had read none of the recent deposition testimony about the relationship between Ford and its two brake consultants, Cardno ChemRisk and Exponent.

In his curriculum vitae, Paustenbach, president of Cardno ChemRisk, says he is “a board-certified toxicologist and industrial hygienist with nearly 30 years of experience in risk assessment, environmental engineering, ecotoxicology and occupational health.” The 181-page CV shows he has worked on topics ranging from arsenic in wine to heavy metals in hip implants; authored or co-authored 271 peer-reviewed articles; and given 440 presentations at conferences. He is regularly retained as a defense expert in asbestos litigation and other toxic-tort cases.

Paustenbach offered a window into his thinking in a 2009 article written by a University of Virginia business professor.

“Without a doubt, a large percentage of environmental and occupational claims are simply bogus, intended only to extract money from those who society believes can afford to ‘share the wealth,’” Paustenbach told his interviewer. He said, “The vast majority of cases that I’ve seen were fraudulent with respect to the scientific merit and billions upon billions of dollars are redistributed annually inappropriately — at least from a scientific standpoint.

“… Nonetheless,” Paustenbach said, “I am a firm believer in the wisdom of juries and support giving generous awards to those that have been truly harmed by bad corporate behavior.”

In a 2010 letter to Dolores Nuñez Studier, a lawyer in the Ford general counsel’s office, Paustenbach claimed his firm’s papers had “changed the scientific playing field in the courtroom. You know this better than anyone as you have seen the number of plaintiff verdicts [in asbestos cases] decrease and the cost of settlement go down over time.”

In the letter, which surfaced in the discovery phase of a lawsuit, Paustenbach complained that the fee structure in place between Ford and Chemrisk was “out of date” and too low.

“Dolores, currently, you are among our largest clients,” he wrote. “And, Ford has certainly been a loyal supporter. The Big 3 [automakers] were the foundation of the firm during our formative years, and for this reason, I have tried to go the extra mile to satisfy your needs.”

Asked to explain the letter during a 2014 deposition, Paustenbach said he was merely emphasizing to Studier that “we invested in scientific research to answer questions that remained unanswered in the courtroom for many, many years …. And I was pretty proud of that.” He said he didn’t feel it was fair for his firm to lose money “when, in fact, I was so committed to getting the science straight.”

Creating doubt

The World Health Organization estimates that 107,000 people die each year from asbestos-related diseases. “Exposure to asbestos, including chrysotile, causes cancer of the lung, larynx and ovaries, and also mesothelioma (a cancer of the pleural and peritoneal linings) [and] asbestosis (fibrosis of the lungs),” the WHO says. “No threshold has been identified for the carcinogenic risk of asbestos, including chrysotile.”

OSHA says, “There is no ‘safe’ level of asbestos exposure for any type of asbestos fiber. Asbestos exposures as short in duration as a few days have caused mesothelioma in humans.”

Taking the WHO and OSHA statements at face value, the case against asbestos would seem to be closed: Even someone with very low exposure to the mineral should worry.

In papers published over the past 15 years, however, scientists with Exponent, Cardno ChemRisk and other consulting firms have questioned whether brake mechanics truly are at heightened risk of developing mesothelioma, the disease that has fueled litigation against Ford and others.

A 2004 Exponent paper funded by Ford, GM and Chrysler, for example, concluded that “employment as a motor vehicle mechanic does not increase the risk of developing mesothelioma.” An update of that paper in 2015 found the same result. Each paper was a meta-analysis — an agglomeration of the results of multiple studies that, taken individually, may be too weak to indicate an effect.

In a deposition last October, Exponent’s Mary Jane Teta, a co-author of both meta-analyses, defended her firm’s findings. “I disagree when they say there is no safe level [of asbestos],” she testified. “I know the level of chrysotile … experienced by vehicle mechanics is safe.”

In his statement to the Center, Paustenbach wrote, “It is implausible that nearly 20 epidemiology studies” – on which he bases his legal opinions – “would conclude that there is no increased risk of mesothelioma for the time period during which brakes contained chrysotile asbestos if that were not the appropriate conclusion.”

The studies Paustenbach cites, however, are fraught with limitations, such as small sample sizes, vague job classifications and lack of exposure data. And not all of them found, as he put it, “no increased risk of mesothelioma” among mechanics. In a 1989 paper, for example, a Danish researcher who studied causes of death among auto mechanics reported finding a single case of mesothelioma among her subjects, where none would have been expected in the general population. As with other cancers, she wrote, this number was “too small to state or rule out a potentially increased risk.”

A co-author of another paper, Kay Teschke of the University of British Columbia, testified in a 2012 deposition that her research was being mischaracterized.

“Vehicle mechanics do many different things in their day; some might work on engines, some might only work on wheel alignment,” Teschke testified. “And when you dilute the [asbestos] exposure in that way, you can’t find the relationship with the job … It doesn’t mean that people in that job are somehow immune to the effects of the exposure … “

Christian Hartley, a lawyer in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, who has represented about 100 mesothelioma victims in brake cases, said the papers used in the defense of such lawsuits “push all this data together that’s totally incomparable. That’s what gets reported in the literature and is used to persuade judges and some experts. It’s very misleading to think we have any kind of real handle on what a typical mechanic has for exposure.”

Dr. David Egilman, a clinical professor of family medicine at Brown University and editor of the International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, argues that the papers are deceptive by design. Many reanalyze previously published studies of workers described as mechanics who may have had no contact with asbestos brakes, he said. The effect, Egilman said, is to dilute the cancer data so the overall risk appears low.

Egilman, who consults for asbestos plaintiffs, spends much of his time rebutting Paustenbach and other industry-funded researchers. “They can throw a lot of things at the wall and hope something sticks with the jury,” he said. “It forces people like me or other scientists to try to clean up each thing that was thrown at the wall, one at a time. And by the end of the day, that could be confusing to a jury or judge.”

Egilman said the body of work underwritten by Ford and other asbestos defendants is being used to try to deprive sick workers, or their families, of compensation. “Some courts have adopted it as a standard,” he said.

More broadly, the industry-funded papers can confuse the public – and even government experts.

In 2009, the National Cancer Institute published a fact sheet on its website stating there was no evidence brake work was associated with an increased risk of mesothelioma or lung cancer. The 2004 meta-analysis funded by the automakers was cited as a reference.

Dr. Arthur Frank, chair of the Department of Environmental and Occupational Health at Drexel University, was incredulous.

“What is truly ironic about such a statement is that it is incontrovertible that asbestos, including chrysotile, the type of asbestos found in brakes, does, in fact, cause lung cancer and mesothelioma,” Frank wrote in a letter to the institute’s director obtained by the Center for Public Integrity through a Freedom of Information Act request. “Since we have not banned asbestos in this country, those who might read this statement could well think asbestos brakes are safe, putting at risk both professional and ‘shade tree’ mechanics, and their family members.”

Frank said the meta-analysis cited by the institute was “unreliable and should not serve as the basis for any statement by the NCI.”

Then-NCI Director Dr. John Neiderhuber replied that he had discussed Frank’s critique with an in-house expert who agreed that the language on the website should be amended. The new statement, posted less than two weeks after Frank sent his letter, read that while studies of cancer risks among auto mechanics were limited, “the overall evidence suggests that there is no safe level for asbestos exposure.” The citation of the 2004 paper was deleted.

The brake studies have had global reach. The “chrysotile-is-safe” argument has been used to stave off asbestos bans and preserve markets in developing nations such as India and China, where building materials and other products containing asbestos are widely used.

“The real nefarious part of this research … is that a lot of people who live in those countries are continuing to be exposed under uncontrolled conditions to asbestos,” Egilman said. “That’s the real horror story here.”

Ronnie Stockton’s auto repair shop in Jackson, Tenn. (Courtesy of the Stockton family)
Ronnie and Joyce Stockton. Courtesy of the Stockton family

A Ford loss in Tennessee

While the brake papers and the experts who write them have contributed to defense verdicts in mesothelioma cases, things occasionally go the other way.

Ronnie Stockton operated an auto repair shop 100 feet from his home in Jackson, Tennessee, for 30 years and specialized in brake jobs, often on Ford vehicles. He’d attended training classes in which instructors recommended that paper masks be worn around brake dust but never heard a “full description of what asbestos did,” he said in a recent interview. “We wasn’t warned it could kill you when you swept it up and didn’t wear the mask.”

As it turned out, Stockton’s wife, Joyce, was the one who got sick. She used to help her husband sweep out the shop. She kept the books and washed Ronnie’s dusty clothes. One night in December 2010 she lay down in bed and felt her chest tighten. “I thought I was having a heart attack,” she said. A biopsy confirmed that she had mesothelioma, to that point merely a strange word she’d heard in lawyers’ TV commercials. “I would sit in front of the television trying to learn how to pronounce it, not ever knowing I had the disease,” she said.

The Stocktons sued Ford and went to trial in August. Two Exponent scientists were among the defense experts.

In his closing argument after nearly two weeks of testimony, Ruckdeschel, the Stocktons’ lawyer, said Ford’s experts had “spun the literature” on asbestos. “They’re not taking what the studies say; they’re putting a spin on it.”

If independent research had shown no connection between brake work and mesothelioma, Ruckdeschel said, “they wouldn’t have had to go and pay Exponent to write all the papers to say, ‘Well, we’ve reanalyzed the data, and there really isn’t any evidence.’ ”

Defense lawyer Samuel Tarry urged jurors not to be swayed by the millions of dollars Ford had invested in the papers. It “shouldn’t come as any surprise that over time it costs a lot of money to defend these cases and to publish research where it can be critiqued and criticized and start discussions,” he said. Tarry recounted the testimony of Exponent’s Mark Roberts, who “told you that the majority of mesotheliomas in women are unrelated to asbestos. … He explained that all of us have a background risk, not just for mesothelioma but for any type of cancer …. They can happen naturally. They can happen with an environmental insult.”

After deliberating about two days, the jury returned a $4.65 million verdict in the Stocktons’ favor. It assigned 71 percent of the liability to Ford and 29 percent to brake manufacturer Honeywell, which had been brought into the case on Ford’s motion. Ford has asked for a new trial.

Latisha Strickland was the jury foreman. She’d wanted to assign 100 percent of the blame to Ford but agreed to the 71-29 split to avoid a hung jury.

“I felt ashamed — I had compromised what I thought it should be,” Strickland, a home-school teacher, said in a telephone interview. “You couldn’t give me the Powerball lottery to go through the amount of surgeries this woman [Joyce Stockton] has gone through.”

Strickland said she was especially put off by the 1971 memo showing Ford decided not to spend $1.25 per vehicle to replace front-end asbestos brakes.

“It proved Ford knew,” she said.

Jie Jenny Zou contributed to this story

SOURCE

Ford spent $40 million to reshape asbestos science

Photo: By Dave Parker – Own work, CC BY 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=2954149

Secret “Paraquat Papers” Reveal Corporate Tactics to Protect Weed Killer Linked to Parkinson’s Disease

The poisoners are still at it … corporations rule … EWR


From The New Lede
Posted at Sustainable Pulse

For decades, Swiss chemical giant Syngenta has manufactured and marketed a widely used weed killing chemical called paraquat, and for much of that time the company has been dealing with external concerns that long-term exposure to the chemical may cause the dreaded, incurable brain ailment known as Parkinson’s disease.

Syngenta has repeatedly told customers and regulators that scientific research does not prove a connection between its weed killer and the disease, insisting that the chemical does not readily cross the blood-brain barrier, and does not affect brain cells in ways that cause Parkinson’s.

But a cache of internal corporate documents dating back to the 1950s obtained by The New Lede in a reporting collaboration with the Guardian suggests that the public narrative put forward by Syngenta and the corporate entities that preceded it has at times contradicted the company’s own research and knowledge.

And though the documents reviewed do not show that Syngenta’s scientists and executives believed that paraquat can cause Parkinson’s, they do show a corporate focus on strategies to protect product sales, refute external scientific research and influence regulators.

In one defensive tactic, the documents lay out how the company worked behind the scenes to try to keep a highly regarded scientist from sitting on an advisory panel for the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The agency is the chief US regulator for paraquat and other pesticides. Company officials wanted to make sure the efforts could not be traced back to Syngenta, the documents show.

And the documents show that insiders feared they could face legal liability for long-term, chronic effects of paraquat as long ago as 1975. One company scientist called the situation “a quite terrible problem,” for which “some plan could be made….”

That prediction of legal consequences has come to pass. Thousands of people who allege they developed Parkinson’s because of long-term chronic effects of paraquat exposure are now suing Syngenta. Along with Syngenta, they are also suing Chevron USA, the successor to a company that distributed paraquat in the US  from 1966 to 1986. Both companies deny any liability and continue to maintain that scientific evidence does not support a causal link between paraquat and Parkinson’s disease.

“Recent thorough reviews performed by the most advanced and science-based regulatory authorities, including the United States and Australia, continue to support the view that paraquat is safe,” Syngenta said in a statement.

Chevron issued a statement saying that the company and predecessors had no role in causing the plaintiffs’ illnesses, and it “will vigorously defend against the allegations in the lawsuits.”

As part of a court-ordered disclosure in the litigation, the companies provided plaintiffs’ lawyers with decades of internal records, including hand-written and typed memos, internal presentations, and emails to and from scientists, lawyers and company officials around the world. And though the files have not yet been made public through the court system, The New Lede and the Guardian reviewed hundreds of pages of these documents.

Among the revelations from the documents: Scientists with Syngenta predecessor Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd. (ICI) and Chevron Chemical were aware in the 1960s and 70s of mounting evidence showing paraquat could accumulate in the human brain.

Read More Here

Photo: sustainablepulse.com

The real Anthony Fauci (Pt 2)

View Part 2 at this link (Part 1 included)

Everything Is Fake: Top 40 Pieces Of Fakery In Our World

From Wake Up New Zealand (Source: WakeUpWorld)

Everything is fake in our society today – or at least a great many things are. Our world is filled with an extraordinary amount of lies, deception, disinformation, misinformation, fakery, fraud, facades, mirages, propaganda and brainwashing.

The good thing though is that once you awaken to the deception, you can use it as a tool for raising your consciousness. The idea that virtually everything is fake can be empowering rather than depressing.

Related: Exposing The Mainstream Consensus Reality Complex

Sure, we’ve all felt overwhelmed, sad, angry and impotent at times when we’ve seen just how easily our (mis)leaders can fool the masses with sophistry and empty rhetoric, but they’ve all been placed there to challenge us to wake up more quickly and fully, and reclaim our world.

Here’s my list of the top 40 pieces of fakery in our world today:

1. Fake News

Let’s begin with the MSM (Mainstream Media), better called the lamestream media, and their “news”, which is essentially corporate infotainment. The MSM waters down the news and makes it entertaining to further distract people from things of real significance.

There is nothing balanced, impartial or fair about MSM news. In the US, Australia and many other Western nations, the news is dominated by a handful of for-profit corporations who are legally bound to provide a return on investment to their shareholders.

READ AT THE LINK

http://www.wakeupkiwi.com/news-articles-93.shtml#Fakery

Image by pixel2013 from Pixabay

How Bayer/Monsanto has been systematically undercutting science & making large investments to build propaganda that attacks non-GMO activists & organizations (IRT)

From Institute for Responsible Technology

Bayer versus the planet.

CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.

Bayer has been in the news recently (rightfully so) for – you guessed it – poisoning the planet. We have stood against Bayer/Monsanto for twenty years and it’s high time they stand accountable for their planetary injustice.

This week you may have seen that the CDC released a report which stated 80% of urine samples taken from Americans contained glyphosate, “Roundup”.

What you likely didn’t hear is that Bayer/Monsanto has been systematically undercutting science and making large investments to build propaganda that attacks organizations like IRT, GM Watch, NonGMO Project, and other non-GMO activists.

In a 2019 Huff Post article, Bayer stated they, “no longer provided support for the Genetic Literacy Project” – a misinformation website designed to produce content devaluing other scientific studies which are not pro-GMO.

The article (again dated in 2019) points out how Bayer leveraged its many resources to suppress evidence of the health and environmental damage caused by glyphosate and challenged the World Health Organization’s determination that it’s probably “cancer-causing.”

During the Monsanto trials, a secret company email targeted our founder Jeffrey Smith. The subject line was “Whack-a-Mole,” an internal Monsanto joke about how they attack those who expose the true dangers of their products. They even had a large budget-item called “Let Nothing Go,” funding used to suppress all evidence that GMOs, glyphosate, and Gene Editing cause dangerous side effects. Jeffrey’s extensive reporting over two decades was one of their familiar targets.

Their lies and attacks continue. The latest is pretending that gene edited GMOs are safe. And they’ve paid all sorts of organizations and scientists to repeat the lie. Tragically, numerous governments have been tricked, and now allow gene edited GMOs to be introduced into our food supply and environment without any safety checks or even notifying regulators This poses an unprecedented threat to each of us, and future generations. The time to act is now.

TAKE ACTION HERE

SOURCE:

IRT Newsletter:

https://archive.aweber.com/newsletter/awlist6265886/MTUxNzY0NTM=/bayer-versus-the-planet.htm

Photo: hpgruesen @ pixabay.com

Have millions been taking antidepressants with harmful side-effects for decades – with no scientific evidence they do what they claim? Some experts have suspected it for years…patients left reeling by groundbreaking study

(Thanks to flying cuttlefish picayune for the link)

  • New research shows the theory justifying antidepressants is just a myth
  • The research confirms what some medical professionals have suspected
  • Depression being a chemical imbalance has been proven to be unfounded

Like millions of patients who seek help from their GPs for depression, Emma Ward was repeatedly told she was suffering from ‘an imbalance of chemicals in the brain’.

If Emma wanted to get better, her doctors said the 26-year-old should keep taking the antidepressants she had been prescribed since she was 15 — even though the drugs did not seem to improve her mood, and left her feeling perpetually numb emotionally.

Now, shocking new research published yesterday shows that the theory justifying the millions of prescriptions for antidepressants handed out every month to patients such as Emma, is simply not true.

READ AT THE LINK

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11033517/Have-millions-taking-antidepressants-harmful-effects-decades-no-reason.html

RELATED:

How Modern Medicine Became a Monopoly

Toxicology vs Virology: The Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud

Photo: pixabay.com

The Pfizer “vaccine” has only 1,291 side effects! (The clinical data a judge forced the FDA to release … it’s worse than you could possibly imagine)

Could this have anything—or everything—to do with the ongoing plague of “sudden deaths” now ravaging humanity worldwide?

Mark Crispin Miller

It’s (seemingly) a lucky thing for Pfizer—and all of its accomplices, including Bill Gates, Dr. Fauci (remember him?), nearly every state and national leader, and almost every journalist, both corporate and “alternative”—that Putin picked this moment to invade Ukraine.

A judge forced the FDA to release Pfizer’s clinical data and it’s worse than you can possibly imagine

Emerald Robinson

The FDA was forced by a judge to release clinical data on the COVID vaccines back in January and so 55,000 pages of documents were just released. The FDA had originally wanted to hide the data for 75 years and release it in 2096 because, of course, the FDA is basically engaged in a criminal conspiracy. The COVID vaccines should never have been approved. This was obvious from the very beginning when animal trials were skipped in the Trump Administration’s ill-fated “Operation War Speed.” And now it’s undeniably true. We have the clinical data, and it’s horrific.

Hiding out in one appendix is the clinical data for Pfizer’s vaccine — which lists 1,291 adverse side effects in alphabetical order. Let’s give you just the bad things that can happen to people who took the Pfizer vaccine that start with the letter “a” to enjoy:

READ AT THE LINK

FDA gaslights the world with FAKE “approval” of Pfizer vaccine

(Natural News) We now know the FDA “approval” of the Pfizer covid vaccine is a bold, treacherous gaslighting campaign involving media lies, fake science and criminal conduct at the FDA itself. Issuing two letters on Monday, the FDA actually extended the EUA for the Pfizer vaccine while granting approval to a different vaccine called “Comirnaty” which does not exist in the marketplace and isn’t even in production.

Through carefully crafted weasel words, the FDA has attempted to conflate the two vaccines to try to gaslight America into thinking the Pfizer covid vaccine now has full approval, all while making sure Pfizer still has legal immunity under the EUA for all the injuries and deaths caused by its vaccine.

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-08-25-fda-gaslights-the-world-with-fake-approval-of-pfizer-vaccine.html

RELATED:

Pfizer Kill Shot NOT FDA APPROVED, STILL UNDER EMERGENCY USE ONLY

Photo: pixabay.com

CDC admits that the “vaccines” don’t work, but won’t admit admitting it

via markcrispinmiller.com

From Lila York:

On Thursday, an internal CDC slide deck was “leaked”. On Friday, an “official” document was presented. The first is more interesting, because it contains things that are ostensibly not meant for public consumption (how to present…). The second is made up of a lot of official looking terminology. What else? But both largely say the same thing: there is no difference between the infection rates of vaccinated and non-vaccinated people. Of course that is then dressed up again in calls to get vaccinated, they can’t help themselves…

In colorful language such as “the war has changed” and “Delta spreads as easily as chickenpox”, the CDC tries very hard to undermine -even deny- it own findings. The slide deck is here:

Improving Communications Around Vaccine Breakthrough And Vaccine Effectiveness

CNN commented:

“The document – a slide presentation – outlines unpublished data that shows fully vaccinated people might spread the Delta variant at the same rate as unvaccinated people..”

The New York Times said:

“The Delta variant is as contagious as chickenpox and may be spread by vaccinated people as easily as the unvaccinated, an internal C.D.C. report said.”

READ MORE

https://www.theautomaticearth.com/2021/08/the-vaccines-dont-work/

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

‘COVID’ DEATHS – those fudged stats so many of us knew about

Note the link now gone … here is a replacement for the time being on topic, re falsifying covid deaths (I’ll endeavour to locate another copy of the original video):

Falsifying Covid Deaths.

The hype and the deaths that MSM (aka lamestream) declined to investigate or comment on … bit late now really isn’t it? The re classifying of cause of death no matter what it was, to CV. I am curious nevertheless as this is mainstream announcing the admission. It’s been gotten away with and still folk are lining up for the jab, too lazy to investigate the truth.

Listen at the link while it is still there:

https://www.facebook.com/suvad.knight/videos/10158553327615861/

Attorney Files Lawsuit Against CDC Based on “Sworn Declaration” from Whistleblower Claiming 45,000 Deaths are Reported to VAERS – All Within 3 Days of COVID-19 Shots

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Ohio-based Attorney Thomas Renz was one of several speakers this past weekend at a conference in Anaheim, California, where he announced that with the help of America’s Frontline Doctors, he was filing a federal lawsuit in Alabama based on a “sworn declaration, under threat of perjury,” from an alleged whistleblower who claims to have inside knowledge of a cover-up of reported deaths filed with the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which is operated by the CDC.

This whistleblower has allegedly claimed, under oath, that there are at least 45,000 reported deaths that have occurred within 3 days of receiving a COVID-19 “vaccine.” Renz states that this report of 45,000 deaths is just from “one system” that reports to VAERS.

This would be significantly greater than what the CDC is currently reporting, which is 10,991 deaths, and many of those are beyond 3 days following the shots. See:

CENSORED: CDC Records Almost 12,000 DEATHS in 7 Months Following COVID-19 Injections

Renz also states that he believes Google, Facebook, and Twitter are “complicit with causing death” due to their censorship, and he stated “I cannot wait to sue you, over and over again.”

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/attorney-files-lawsuit-against-cdc-based-on-sworn-declaration-from-whistleblower-claiming-45000-deaths-are-reported-to-vaers-all-within-3-days-of-covid-19-shots/

Photo: Health Impact News

HORRIFIC! – FIVE Jet Blue Airlines Pilots DEAD, 5 Air India & 1 Canadian Cargo – Media Intentionally Hiding Vaxx Fears

WATCH AT THE LINK HERE: (video info below)

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/horrific-five-jet-blue-airlines-pilots-dead-media-intentionally-hiding-vaxx-fears_UiNqr6pOqDWkSbH.html

Rogersings NWO News!

Rogersings NWO News! 16 Jul 2021

Source —> ⁣https://rumble.com/vjxv7w-horr….ific-five-jet-blue-a

⁣4 British Airways Pilots Dead
5 Air India Pilots Dead
5 Jet Blue Pilots Dead
1 Canadian Cargo Pilot Dead

⁣BREAKING NOW! Five Jet Blue Airlines pilots are confirmed dead, current Jet Blue pilot whistleblower confirms push for jab continues. Dr. Jane Ruby joins Stew Peters with details.

www.StewPeters.tv | www.DrjaneRuby.com


⁣Coincidence? Three Presidents DEAD in Three Countries after blocking distribution of Covid vaccines —> ⁣https://freewestmedia.com/2021…./07/17/coincidence-t

⁣HORRIFIC! – FIVE Jet Blue Airlines Pilots DEAD, Media Intentionally Hiding Vaxx Fears BY STEW PETERS SHOW —> ⁣https://www.redvoicemedia.com/….2021/07/horrific-fiv

⁣Four British Airway pilots DIE in the same week, just days after getting second covid shot —> ⁣https://www.vaccinedeaths.com/….2021-06-20-four-brit

⁣Nearly 11,000 Deaths After COVID Vaccines Reported to CDC, as FDA Adds New Warning to J&J Vaccine —> ⁣⁣https://childrenshealthdefense…..org/defender/vaers-

⁣Governments are using credit card purchase data as “contact tracing’ COVID surveillance —> ⁣https://reclaimthenet.org/gove….rnments-are-using-cr

⁣================================================================

No Jab for Me (thousands of links and details about how the virus and the vaccines are CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY!) —> https://nojabforme.info/

Informed Consent Matter (113 pages of details of those who have DIED from the JAB) —> https://fossaorg.files.wordpre….ss.com/2021/04/54aae

“Then God said, “I now give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the entire earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food.” – Genesis 1:29

3 Foods That Contain Shikimic Acid to Halt Spike Protein Transmission —> https://deeprootsathome.com/3-….foods-that-contain-s

Get Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), Ivermectin, and other COVID-19 medications in the USA in almost every state within 24 hours —> https://deeprootsathome.com/an….alyze-risk-benefit-f
Get COVID medication sent to your home —> CALL RAVKOO PHARMACY – Phone: 863-875-5700

Here Are 35 Reasons NOT to take the JAB by Gary G. Kohls, MD —> https://www.lewrockwell.com/20….21/05/gary-g-kohls/n

SHARE this with Loved Ones (An excellent 16 minute video to articulate the DANGER of this EXPERIMENT Gentic Code Injection!) —> https://brandnewtube.com/watch…./share-with-loved-on

20 Mechanisms of Injuries (MOI) – How COVID-19 Injections Can Make You Sick; Even Kill You – Dr. Sherri Tenpenny —> https://files.constantcontact…..com/15c678ac701/e636

COVID-19 JABS Are Gene Therapy NOT VACCINES! —> https://articles.mercola.com/s….ites/articles/archiv

Harmful Ingredients in Vaccines —> http://dangersofvaccines.com/h….armful-ingredients-v

Statements in this site are substantiated with facts that will stand in a court of law —> https://nojabforme.info/

Informed Consent Information (one page printable handout) —> https://www.die2live.online/wp….-content/uploads/202

Sometime after June 9, 2020 the WHO changed the definition of “herd immunity” from naturally acquried immunity or vaccinated immunity, to vaccinated ONLY immunity. I have “heard” immunity … I heard this is a scam-demic where the real purpose is to inject people with an Experimental Genetic Code so they can be culled and controlled! —> https://web.archive.org/web/20….201023093420/https:/

Form for Employees Whose Employers Are Requiring Covid-19 Injections —> https://www.coreysdigs.com/sol….utions/form-for-empl

Every Vaccine Produces Harm – Dr Andrew Moulden —> ⁣https://www.docdroid.net/1b8T6….jd/dr-andrew-moulden

Your Rights! —> ⁣https://www.peoplesrights.org/your-rights

18 Reasons I Won’t Be Getting a Covid Vaccine —> https://www.deconstructingconv….entional.com/post/18

THE VACCINATION RACKET (1,000s of links exposing the DEADLY VAXX hoax) —> http://whale.to/vaccines.html

Vaccines, The Biggest Medical Fraud In History (2018 E Book) —> https://archive.org/details/va….ccines-the-biggest-m

Health Freedom Advocacy Center – You can hold the government accountable to protect your ability to choose what’s best for your health and for the wellbeing of your children. —> https://standforhealthfreedom.com/

COVID-19 Overview —> https://lifefacts.lifesitenews.com/covid-19/

*VAERS USA COVID REPORTS (Quick Display of VAXX Injury) —-> https://www.openvaers.com/covid-data

5 questions to ask your friends who plan to get the Covid vaccine —> https://off-guardian.org/2021/….02/15/5-questions-to

People’s International Court oF Justice —> https://peoplesinternationalcourtofjustice.org/

*LOTS OF LINKS* Medical Opposition to CoVid-19 LockDowns, Vaccine Dangers, Disturbing Global Agendas, 5G Radiation, Boost Immune System Naturally —> http://might-want-to-know.medianewsonline.com/

Great Barrington Declaration —> https://medicalkidnap.com/2020…./10/18/doctors-for-t

Effective Treatments for COVID-19 – Ivermectin and Vitamin D —> https://ivmmeta.com/

A Guide to Home-Based COVID Treatment —> https://faculty.utrgv.edu/elef….therios.gkioulekas/z

Identifying the Luciferian Globalists Implementing the New World Order – Who are the “Jews”? —> https://medicalkidnap.com/2021…./06/20/identifying-t

Dispensational Truth or God’s Plan and Purpose in the Ages By Clarence Larkin —> http://www.despatch.cth.com.au…./Books_V/Dispensatio

Image by Ralph Klein from Pixabay

CDC Caught Deleting 150k of Vaccine Death Cases From VAERS Website-Vaccine Genocide

VIDEO AT THE LINK:

https://crazzfiles.com/cdc-caught-deleting-150k-of-vaccine-death-cases-from-vaers-website-vaccine-genocide/?fbclid=IwAR0UIdXT4bQuUcUT-oVCYF3_AyulKkabGICjimtqGhoS6V3iwDidJlkdR6I

The biggest crime committed during vaccine heist: the purposeful suppression of safe and effective treatments

From mercola.com

Story at-a-glance

  • While the list of crimes committed by authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic is a long one, perhaps the biggest crime of all is the purposeful suppression of safe and effective treatments, including ivermectin. This appears to have been done to protect the COVID “vaccine” program
  • The COVID shots were brought to market under emergency use authorization (EUA), which can only be obtained if there are no other safe and effective alternatives available
  • Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies looked at ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. A rapid review performed on behalf of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) in the U.S., January 3, 2021, found the drug “probably reduces deaths by an average 83% compared to no ivermectin treatment”
  • According to a more recent review and meta-analysis, ivermectin, when used preventatively, reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86%
  • Another recent scientific review concluded ivermectin produces large statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance

While the list of crimes committed by authorities during the COVID-19 pandemic is a long one, perhaps the biggest crime of all is the purposeful suppression of safe and effective treatments. At this point, it seems quite clear that this was done to protect the COVID jab rollout.

The COVID shots were brought to market under emergency use authorization (EUA), which can only be obtained if there are no other alternatives available. In a sane world, the COVID gene therapies would never have gotten an EUA, as there are several safe and effective treatment options available.

One treatment that stands out above the others is ivermectin, a decades-old antiparasitic drug that is on the World Health Organization’s list of essential medications.

What makes ivermectin particularly useful in COVID-19 is the fact that it works both in the initial viral phase of the illness, when antivirals are required, as well as the inflammatory stage, when the viral load drops off and anti-inflammatories become necessary. It’s been shown to significantly inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro,1 speed up viral clearance and dramatically reduce the risk of death.

Gold Standard Review Supports Use of Ivermectin

Dr. Tess Lawrie, a medical doctor, Ph.D., researcher and director of Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd (video above).2 in the U.K., has been trying to get the word out about ivermectin. To that end, she helped organize the British Ivermectin Recommendation Development (BIRD) panel3 and the International Ivermectin for COVID Conference,4 which was held online, April 24, 2021.

Twelve medical experts5 from around the world shared their knowledge during this conference, reviewing mechanism of action, protocols for prevention and treatment, including so-called long-hauler syndrome, research findings and real world data. All of the lectures, which were recorded via Zoom, can be viewed on Bird-Group.org.6

Lawrie has published several systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies looking at ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 infection. A rapid review performed on behalf of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) in the U.S., January 3, 2021, found the drug “probably reduces deaths by an average 83% compared to no ivermectin treatment.”7

Her February 2021 meta-analysis, which included 13 studies, found a 68% reduction in deaths. This is an underestimation of the beneficial effect, because one of the studies included used hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the control arm. Since HCQ is an active treatment that has also been shown to have a positive impact on outcomes, it’s not surprising that this particular study did not rate ivermectin as better than the control treatment (which was HCQ).

Two months later, March 31, 2021, Lawrie published an updated analysis that included two additional randomized controlled trials. This time, the mortality reduction was 62%. When four studies with high risk of bias were removed during a subsequent sensitivity analysis, they ended up with a 72% reduction in deaths.

(Sensitivity analyses are done to double-check and verify results. Since the sensitivity analysis rendered an even better result, it confirms the initial finding. In other words, ivermectin is unlikely to reduce mortality by anything less than 62%.)

Lawrie reviewed the February and March analyses and other meta-analyses in an interview with Dr. John Campbell, featured in “More Good News on Ivermectin.” Lawrie has now published her third systematic review. According to this paper, published June 17, 2021 in the American Journal of Therapeutics:8

“Meta-analysis of 15 trials found that ivermectin reduced risk of death compared to no ivermectin (average risk ratio 0.38 …) … Low-certainty evidence found that ivermectin prophylaxis reduced COVID-19 infection by an average 86% … Secondary outcomes provided less certain evidence.

Low-certainly evidence suggested that there may be no benefit with ivermectin for ‘need for mechanical ventilation,’ whereas effect estimates for ‘improvement’ and ‘deterioration’ clearly favored ivermectin use. Severe adverse events were rare among treatment trials …”

World Health Organization Refuses to Recommend Ivermectin

Despite the fact that most of the evidence favors ivermectin, when the WHO finally updated its guidance on ivermectin at the end of March 2021,9,10 they largely rejected it, saying more data are needed. They only recommend it for patients who are enrolled in a clinical trial.

Yet, they based their negative recommendation on a review that included just five studies, which still ended up showing a 72% reduction in deaths. What’s more, in the WHO’s summary of findings, they suddenly include data from seven studies, which combined show an 81% reduction in deaths. The confidence interval is also surprisingly high, with a 64% reduction in deaths on the low end, and 91% on the high end.

Even more remarkable, their absolute effect estimate for standard of care is 70 deaths per 1,000, compared to just 14 deaths per 1,000 when treating with ivermectin. That’s a reduction in deaths of 56 per 1,000 when using the drug. The confidence interval is between 44 and 63 fewer deaths per 1,000.

Despite that, the WHO refuses to recommend this drug for COVID-19. Rabindra Abeyasinghe, a WHO representative to the Philippines, commented that using ivermectin without “strong” evidence is “harmful” because it can give “false confidence” to the public.11

Why Ivermectin Has Been Censored

If you’ve been trying to share the good news about ivermectin, you’re undoubtedly noticed that doing so is incredibly difficult. Many social media companies are banning such posts outright.

Promoting ivermectin on YouTube, or even discussing benefits cited in published research, violates the platform’s posting policies. DarkHorse podcast host Bret Weinstein, Ph.D., is but one of the victims of this censorship policy.

His interviews with medical and scientific experts such as Dr. Pierre Kory, a lung and ICU specialist, former professor of medicine at St. Luke’s Aurora Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and the president and chief medical officer12 of the FLCCC, and Dr. Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA and DNA vaccine core platform technology,13 have been deleted from the platform. The interview with Malone had more than 587,330 views by the time it was wiped from YouTube.14

But why? Why don’t they want people to feel confident that there’s treatment out there and that COVID-19 is not the death sentence they’ve been led to believe it is? The short answer is because ivermectin threatens the vaccine program. As explained by Andrew Bannister in a May 12, 2021, Biz News article:15

“What if there was a cheap drug, so old its patent had expired, so safe that it’s on the WHO’s lists of Essential and Children’s Medicines, and used in mass drug administration rollouts?

What if it can be taken at home with the first signs COVID symptoms, given to those in close contact, and significantly reduce COVID disease progression and cases, and far fewer few people would need hospitalization?

The international vaccine rollout under Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) would legally have to be halted. For an EUA to be legal, ‘there must be no adequate, approved and available alternative to the candidate product for diagnosing, preventing or treating the disease or condition.’

The vaccines would only become legal once they passed level 4 trials and that certainly won’t happen in 2021 … The vaccine rollout, outside of trials, would become illegal.

The vaccine manufactures, having spent hundreds of million dollars developing and testing vaccines during a pandemic, would not see the $100bn they were expecting in 2021 … Allowing any existing drug, at this time, well into stage 3 trials, to challenge the legality of the EUA of vaccines, is not going to happen easily.”

The WHO and Drug Companies Are Severely Compromised

The WHO’s rejection of ivermectin only makes sense if a) you take into account the EUA requirements; and b) remember that the WHO receives a significant portion of its funding from private vaccine interests.

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the second largest funder of the WHO after the United States, and The GAVI Alliance, also owned by Gates, is the fourth largest donor. The GAVI Alliance exists solely to promote and profit from vaccines, and for several years, the WHO director-general, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, served on the GAVI board of directors.16

As reported by Bannister, Merck, the original patent holder of ivermectin, also has severe conflicts of interest that appear to have played a role in the rejection of ivermectin. He writes:17

“Ivermectin has been used in humans for 35 years and over 4 billion doses have been administered. Merck, the original patent holder,18 donated 3.7 billion doses to developing countries … Its safety is documented at doses twenty times the normal …

Merck’s patent on Ivermectin expired in 1996 and they produce less than 5% of global supply. In 2020 they were asked to assist in Nigerian and Japanese trials but declined both.

In 2021 Merck released a statement claiming that Ivermectin was not an effective treatment against Covid-19 and bizarrely claimed, ‘A concerning lack of safety data in the majority of studies’ of the drug they donated to be distributed in mass rollouts, by primary care workers, in mass campaigns, to millions in developing countries.

The media reported the Merck statement as a blinding truth without looking at the conflict of interests when days later, Merck received $356m from the US government to develop an investigational therapeutic.

The WHO even quoted Merck, as evidence, that it didn’t work, in their recommendation against the use of Ivermectin. It’s a dangerous world when corporate marketing determines public health policy.”

FLCCC Calls for Widespread and Early Use of Ivermectin

In the U.S., the FLCCC has been calling for widespread adoption of ivermectin, both as a prophylactic and for the treatment of all phases of COVID-19,19,20 and Kory has testified to the benefits of ivermectin before a number of COVID-19 panels, including the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs in December 202021 and the National Institutes of Health COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines Panel in January 2021.22

Based on a meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials, ivermectin produces large statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.

As noted by the FLCCC:23

“The data shows the ability of the drug Ivermectin to prevent COVID-19, to keep those with early symptoms from progressing to the hyper-inflammatory phase of the disease, and even to help critically ill patients recover.

… numerous clinical studies — including peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials — showed large magnitude benefits of Ivermectin in prophylaxis, early treatment and also in late-stage disease. Taken together … dozens of clinical trials that have now emerged from around the world are substantial enough to reliably assess clinical efficacy.”

The FLCCC has published three different COVID-19 protocols, all of which include the use of ivermectin:

  • I-MASK+24 — a prevention and early at-home treatment protocol
  • I-MATH+25 — an in-hospital treatment protocol. The clinical and scientific rationale for this protocol has been peer-reviewed and was published in the Journal of Intensive Care Medicine26 in mid-December 2020
  • I-RECOVER27 — a long-term management protocol for long-haul syndrome

In addition to Lawrie’s meta-analysis in the American Journal of Therapeutics, the FLCCC has also published a scientific review28 in that same journal.

This paper, “Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19,” published in the May/June 2021 issue, found that, based on a meta-analysis of 18 randomized controlled trials, ivermectin produces “large statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance.”

Ivermectin Significantly Reduces Infection Risk and Death

The FLCCC also found that when used as a preventive, ivermectin “significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19.” In one study, of those given a dose of 0.4 mg per kilo on Day 1 and a second dose on Day 7, only 2% tested positive for SARS-CoV-2, compared to 10% of controls who did not get the drug.

In another, family members of patients who had tested positive were given two doses of 0.25 mg/kg, 72 hours apart. At follow up two weeks later, only 7.4% of the exposed family members who took ivermectin tested positive, compared to 58.4% of those who did not take ivermectin.

In a third, which unfortunately was unblended, the difference between the two groups was even greater. Only 6.7% of the ivermectin group tested positive compared to 73.3% of controls. According to the FLCCC, “the difference between the two groups was so large and similar to the other prophylaxis trial results that confounders alone are unlikely to explain such a result.”

The FLCCC also points out that ivermectin distribution campaigns have resulted in “rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality,” which indicate that ivermectin is “effective in all phases of COVID-19.” For example, in Brazil, three regions distributed ivermectin to its residents, while at least six others did not. The difference in average weekly deaths is stark.

In Santa Catarina, average weekly deaths declined by 36% after two weeks of ivermectin distribution, whereas two neighboring regions in the South saw declines of just 3% and 5%. Amapa in the North saw a 75% decline, while the Amazonas had a 42% decline and Para saw an increase of 13%.

It’s worth noting that ivermectin’s effectiveness appears largely unaffected by variants, meaning it has worked on any and all variants that have so far popped up around the world. Additional evidence for ivermectin will hopefully come from the British PRINCIPLE trial,29 which began June 23, 2021. Ivermectin will be evaluated as an outpatient treatment in this study, which will be the largest clinical trial to date.

Ivermectin in the Treatment of Long-Haul Syndrome

The FLCCC believes ivermectin may also be an important treatment adjunct for long-haul COVID syndrome. In their June 16, 2021, video update, the team reviewed the newly released I-RECOVER protocol.

Keep in mind that ivermectin is not to be used in isolation. Corticosteroids, for example, are often a crucial treatment component when organizing pneumonia-related lung damage is present. Vitamin C is also important to combat inflammation. Be sure to work with your doctor to identify the right combination of drugs and supplements for you.

Last but not least, as noted by Kory in this video, it’s really important to realize that long-haul syndrome is entirely preventable. The key is early treatment when you develop symptoms of COVID-19.

While ivermectin has a good track record when it comes to prevention and early treatment, it can be tricky to obtain, depending on where you live and who your doctor is.

A highly effective alternative that anyone can use, anywhere, is nebulized hydrogen peroxide. It’s extremely safe and very inexpensive. The biggest cost is the one-time purchase of a good tabletop jet nebulizer. To learn more, download Dr. Thomas Levy’s free e-book, “Rapid Virus Recovery,” in which he details how to use this treatment.

SOURCE

https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2021/06/30/ivermectin-covid-19-treatment.aspx

800,000 Australians have had a VX now identified by their Chief Health Minister as having more risks than benefits .. they LIED

Same scenario playing out world wide as the true adverse event including death figures are kept from us. Only those dedicated to setting up their own sites or social media pages are capturing a truer picture. Be warned folk. Do your research (online, not MSM) to make your own fully informed decision.

Hear Craig Kelly, member for Hughes, NSW speak at the link:

https://www.facebook.com/wwwdotcom/videos/10158467176829366

Stop the New Zealand government’s plan to seal Pike River mine!

From wsws.org

The Labour Party-led government is racing to shut down the underground investigation of Pike River coal mine. It aims to prevent the recovery of evidence that could lead to prosecutions of those responsible for the disaster which killed 29 workers in November 2010.

The Pike River Recovery Agency (PRRA), which has only explored the mine’s drift or entry tunnel, intends to pull workers and equipment out and start sealing the mine this week.

Nobody from Pike River Coal Ltd. has been prosecuted for the company’s egregious violations of workplace safety legislation, including grossly inadequate ventilation, which allowed methane gas to reach explosive levels. A 2012 royal commission of inquiry established that the company placed production ahead of workers’ safety and ignored numerous warnings of a catastrophe.

READ MORE

https://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2021/06/28/nzpi-j28.html?fbclid=IwAR1EWOIR2fBqjKI9sS81CigbcTaTYfK7vDN7xGFQpOnBlFdw6Mhtk9YfvQo

RELATED:

What is the New Zealand government trying to bury in Pike River mine?

Go to our Pike River Mine page to read an investigative report on the gross corruption behind this disaster.

Photo: wsws.org

“Out! Out damned spot!”: tweaking the death count folks

If ever you suspected corruption well this is it right here! Many I know will be suffering from cognitive dissonance at all this. My many years of uncovering lies & corruption have made me no longer surprised at all. My learning began with lies about our histories (victors write those remember) … then it was ‘harmless’ (poison) sprays like glyphosate, then 1080, all bona fide ‘checked’ by the (fake, corrupted) protective authorities … then it was all the food additives & various other environmental poisons that Dr Samuel Epstein exposed as causing cancer way back in the 1970s (swept under the google rug) … then it was the poisons falling from the sky exposed by Elana Freeland, Cliff Carnicom and many many others … then it was the real history of modern medicine courtesy of the Rockefeller fraternity … and that’s only the half of it, on and on, it has been lies upon lies upon lies. This latest episode aka plandemic with all those associated untruths comes as no surprise at all to me. The difficult matter is getting folk to see it.

Here anyway, we have proof of how the stats are being fiddled with…

WATCH/LISTEN AT LINK:
https://anrvideos.com/2021/june21/CDC%20Removes%20150K%20Deaths%20from%20Vaers%20System%20%E2%80%93%20Vaccine%20Genocide.mp4?_=1&fbclid=IwAR1ftJWknhXusdv4A5_l_ZajQ6depe0NnJdJSYhQ_Jd94O5FGKNfd479oTc

RELATED:

Fox News whistleblower is SUSPENDED after announcing plans to release evidence of ‘muzzling’ through Project Veritas – hear that interview

https://thepostmillennial.com/breaking-fox-whistleblower-suspended-after-announcing-plans-to-release-evidence-of-muzzling-through-project-veritas/

BELOW, PROJECT VERITAS INTERVIEW:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4sNoKJqj7k

Those who suffered as children at a Rangitikei psychiatric hospital (Lake Alice) to share their stories

Firstly remember this? …. Sept 2020
“When I filed my claim, instead of compassion, justice, validation and an apology, I received nine gruelling years of emotional battering, abuse and bullying from the Crown,” she said.

CROWN SET UP SECRET LAKE ALICE MEETING

Ex-Lake Alice chief psychiatrist flew from Australia for secret mediation meeting. David Williams reports

Crown lawyers were instrumental in organising – and hushing up – a meeting to settle a $1.5 million lawsuit which involved the secret return to New Zealand of the former head psychiatrist of a notorious children’s mental hospital.

In the 1970s, Dr Selwyn Leeks ran the Lake Alice child and adolescent unit, near Whanganui. Youngsters, many of them misdiagnosed and sent there wrongly, were routinely punished for minor infractions with electric shocks, without anaesthetic or muscle relaxants. After the practice was exposed, the unit was shut down and Leeks left for Australia.

Lake Alice is one of this country’s darkest chapters of child abuse in state care.

No one has ever been charged with criminal behaviour at Lake Alice, despite uncontested evidence of the abuse and torture of children. Last year, a United Nations committee found successive governments had violated the UN Convention against Torture for not properly investigating dozens of claims and holding anyone to account.

Yesterday, at an Abuse in Care Royal Commission hearing in Auckland, it was revealed Leeks secretly flew back to New Zealand in 1998, with the tacit knowledge and involvement of Crown lawyers, to try and settle a High Court claim by Auckland woman Leonie McInroe and another Lake Alice survivor. McInroe took civil action against the Crown and Leeks in 1994 over abuse at Lake Alice, seeking damages of $1.5 million.

Four years later, as the mediation meeting approached, McInroe was sworn to secrecy. ….

READ AT THE LINK: https://www.newsroom.co.nz/crown-set-up-secret-lake-alice-meeting?fbclid=IwAR0D41n2w3tXie8n_ADuxbQQ7ekQdemmvz1o5K5ZukrG1A-ahT6SKaDTvjE

The other article below (mainstream got the location wrong, Lake Alice was in the Rangitikei just minutes from Marton):

From tvnz

It’s hoped their stories, alongside expert and witness testimony will reveal the full extent of what went on at the child and adolescent unit at Lake Alice Hospital – a rural psychiatric facility in the Manawatu-Whanganui region.

The inquiry, which is part of the investigation into abuse in psychiatric care, offers the first comprehensive investigation into just what went on inside that unit.

Almost fifty years on from their abuse at the hands of the state, some of the “Children of Lake Alice” will be sharing their stories, as part of the Royal Commission Inquiry into Abuse in Care.

READ MORE

https://www.tvnz.co.nz/one-news/new-zealand/those-suffered-children-manuwatu-psychiatric-hospital-share-their-stories?fbclid=IwAR2DgLUKS3nEglgaHWnd-N9G7qYOQc0yLeomagI1D2wuJFUTY11Q8sKq1fw

Photo: By Pawful at en.wikipedia – Own workTransferred from en.wikipedia, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=12788845

NZ MDs censured for expressing concern about the experimental mRNA jab ‘are doing exactly what the law and medical ethics require’ (Lawyer, Sue Grey)

EWR comment: I personally have been hearing mainstream radio news items warning that doctors in NZ are spreading misinformation about the experimental injection for CV.

A Stuff article states:

The Royal New Zealand College of General Practitioners is calling for patients and doctors to rely on “evidence-based” information to make decisions and give advice about the vaccine.

I am wondering why no reference by mainstream is being made to the “evidence” in the various government data bases, in particular, USA, UK and EUR, the stats of which are being posted regularly at many websites, one in particular, Health Impact News. See our front, News page, right hand column for their latest stats.

NZ lawyer Sue Grey comments: “NZ doctors who have raised concerns about this experimental jab are doing exactly what the law and medical ethics require. https://i.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/125411083/covid19-multiple-complaints-over-antivaccine-doctors
For good information on alternatives to the experimental jab, check out www.nzdsos.com

5g networks will double cancer rates

Cancer rates already 1 in 3. I read not so long ago mainstream NZ predicting a rise to 1 in 2, no reason given why. The elusive cure (given they suppress the ones we already have called ‘alternative’ that were once mainstream, pre-Rockefeller intervention ie). EWR

Watch/listen at the fb link:

https://www.facebook.com/ExposingTheEliteAgenda/videos/1942808009364903/

Is Fauci going down?

From markcrispinmiller.com

Since his perjurious contretemps with Sen. Paul (it seems his nose just grew too long at last), Dr. Fauci has been looking ever more like a cornered rat (and I say that with all due respect). And now this story takes him down another peg—a story broken by The Australian, a major Murdoch property outside the USA, and now picked up by Consortium News, which, since Bob Parry left us, has been a highly serviceable organ of Covidian propaganda.

READ MORE

https://markcrispinmiller.com/2021/05/is-fauci-going-down/

New Lancet report shows Pfizer, Moderna et al. misled the public with deceptive efficacy statistics

From thecovidblog.com

Read the full article at the link… (below an excerpt from conclusions):

Conclusions

“In other words, the absolute risk reduction for Pfizer mRNA is 0.84%, 1.2% for Moderna and Johnson & Johnson, etc. Now let’s look at absolute risk reduction for some other treatments against COVID-19 as prophylaxis (preventative):

Hydroxychloroquine: 21%
Ivermectin: 5%
Povidone-iodine: 24%
Zinc and Vitamin C: 23%

Of course mainstream media have already dispatched their “fact checkers” as it relates to the Lancet report. Politifact published a word-salad, manipulative diatribe concluding that the Lancet report is “mostly false.” Bottom line is that Pfizer et al. publish RRR efficacy numbers, not ARR efficacy numbers. Laymen interpret 95% efficacy (RRR) as near-immunity, whereas the true 0.84% ARR isn’t sexy enough for publication and mass dissemination.

Lying and manipulation are norms for mainstream media, big pharma and their big tech buddies. All messaging coming from the foregoing entities must at minimum be taken with a grain of salt, or, preferably, ignored all together. The truth is revealing itself more and more everyday. The Gates/Fauci/Schwab cabal is crumbling. They are getting desperate. We all need to keep spreading truth, forcefully and unapologetically to ensure truth wins out.

Stay vigilant and protect your friends and loved ones.”

READ MORE

https://thecovidblog.com/2021/05/31/new-lancet-report-shows-pfizer-moderna-et-al-misled-the-public-with-deceptive-efficacy-statistics/

Image by GraphicMama-team from Pixabay

The five phases of vaccine compliance: We are currently in phase 3, and the last phase involves door-to-door arrests

If you are skeptical, look at Italy right now, the UK, Canada and Germany Tyranny is clearly on the horizon… while many sleep on. You will not read about these events and developments in mainstream media. The header image comes from the UK, posted on social media, “Army Cadets knocking on doors to get people to take the jab! They are in Bolton today. It’s totally outrageous and extremely intimidating and far too similar to Nazi Germany!” EWR
______________________________________________________________________

(Natural News) With new information provided by a contact in the federal government, I’ve been able to further refine the escalation hierarchy of vaccine compliance that’s being pursued by the Biden regime. There are five distinct phases to this escalation:

Phase 1 – Voluntary (pushed by media propaganda, paying off social media influencers, doctors, etc.). This phase ensnares those who are gullible enough to think getting injected with spike protein biological weapons will somehow “save” them or set them free.

Phase 2 – Incentives (lottery tickets, free beer, free donuts, etc.). This phase ensnares those who are stupid enough to trade their lives for beer and donuts. There are a lot of these people, and even the globalists realize that such low IQ people have nothing to contribute to human civilization.

Phase 3 – Private sector punishments – in this stage they use corporations to deny people access to services (such as air travel, cruise ships, restaurants, sporting events, concerts, etc.). This phase hopes to make being unvaccinated extremely inconvenient. WE ARE HERE NOW.

Phase 4 – Criminal fines or jail time (government sector) – This phase will kick in after the fake news media blames the unvaxxed for continued spike protein outbreaks that are killing people. Laws will be passed in some jurisdictions that require constant vaccines and booster shots. Any who refuse to comply will be fined or jailed. You can expect this push to originate in blue states.

Phase 5) – Kinetic (military sector) – open biological and kinetic warfare on the American people, carried out by the “woke” military against the citizens. This phase will take place after the vaccine deep state works with the Biden / Obama regime to stage a massive false flag shooting tragedy that can be blamed on anti-vaxxers and gun owners. Once this event is carried out, Biden and the Democrats will call for turning the U.S. military against the citizens to carry out nationwide gun confiscation and force covid-19 vaccines at gunpoint.

READ MORE:

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-05-31-the-five-phases-of-vaccine-compliance.html

Don’t listen to MSM – Ivermectin’s already been approved as a [successful] covid-19 treatment in more than 20 countries

EWR COMMENT: So why has the media come “down on Ivermectin like an iron curtain”? The video in ‘related’ info below is a good eye opener on that. Particularly on the globalist agenda. Do check out the statistics in terms of deaths & adverse reactions as a result of ‘their’ solution. (Look in categories, CV VX deaths etc, left of news page). Stats are also updated regularly, right side of news page.
_________________________________________________________________________

Malcom X once called the media “the most powerful entity on the earth.” They have, he said, “the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, and that’s power. Because they control the minds of masses”. Today, that power is now infused with the power of the world’s biggest tech and social media companies. Together social and traditional media have the power to make a medicine that has saved possibly millions of lives during the current pandemic disappear from the conversation.

From nakedcapitalism.com

Michael Capuzzo, a New York Times best-selling author , has just published an article titled “The Drug That Cracked Covid”. The 15-page article chronicles the gargantuan struggle being waged by frontline doctors on all continents to get ivermectin approved as a Covid-19 treatment, as well as the tireless efforts by reporters, media outlets and social media companies to thwart them.

https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2021/05/i-dont-know-of-a-bigger-story-in-the-world-right-now-than-ivermectin-ny-times-best-selling-author.html

RELATED:

https://summit.news/2021/05/26/johns-hopkins-prof-half-of-americans-have-natural-immunity-dismissing-it-is-biggest-failure-of-medical-leadership/

Vaccine “Emergency Use Authorization” & Ivermectin (excellent video)

Mainstream media
https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/mainstream-media/

The Ivermectin Story you are not supposed to know about (2 short must-see videos)

CDC is Manipulating Data to Hide Breakthrough Cases and Blame Unvaccinated for “Outbreaks”

How the CDC is manipulating data to prop-up “vaccine effectiveness”

New policies will artificially deflate “breakthrough infections” in the vaccinated, while the old rules continue to inflate case numbers in the unvaccinated.

by Kit Knightly
Off-Guardian.org

The US Center for Disease Control (CDC) is altering its practices of data logging and testing for “Covid19” in order to make it seem the experimental gene-therapy “vaccines” are effective at preventing the alleged disease.

They made no secret of this, announcing the policy changes on their website in late April/early May, (though naturally without admitting the fairly obvious motivation behind the change).

The trick is in their reporting of what they call “breakthrough infections” – that is people who are fully “vaccinated” against Sars-Cov-2 infection, but get infected anyway.

Essentially, Covid19 has long been shown – to those willing to pay attention – to be an entirely created pandemic narrative built on two key factors:

  1. False-postive tests. The unreliable PCR test can be manipulated into reporting a high number of false-positives by altering the cycle threshold (CT value)
  2. Inflated Case-count. The incredibly broad definition of “Covid case”, used all over the world, lists anyone who receives a positive test as a “Covid19 case”, even if they never experienced any symptoms.

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-is-manipulating-data-to-hide-breakthrough-cases-and-blame-unvaccinated-for-outbreaks/

Photo: wikipedia

NZ lamestream is attacking the medics, debunking any narrative other than the government’s

We’ve all heard that the NZ government, having just tweaked the law after being caught with their pants down, is apparently the only source of truth on the CV. That is how far we’ve sunk as a nation. As is the case world wide, we see independent thinking and research about our own health choices being squashed or hidden under the guise of a great threat caused by an illness that has a 99 point something percent survival rate.

Any medical professional who departs from the ‘official’ narrative is skating on thin ice indeed and will risk loss of license at worst, or reputation at least. NZ retired Doctor, Charles Baycroft in a sense forewarned us of this when he alerted us to the MoH’s stance on possible 1080 poisoning. You’re not allowed to look for it.
Dr Baycroft was threatened with prosecution for warning citizens of the dangers of 1080.

This is how far the gullible NZ public has sunk, failing to look further than the newspaper or the news at 6 on TV. If ‘he’ has a white coat and/or is on telly, well he must be speaking the absolute truth. End of story. (NZ’s Barry Smith was right when he said NZ was picked as a test case for Rogernomics economic reforms – their motto being ‘she’ll be right’. It worked).

And so NZ epidemiologist Dr Simon Thornley, (MBChB, MPH(hons), has copped it this week from the NZ whore media Stuff. A long piece by Stuff designed to sway you in case you were sitting on the fence at all. (Dr Thornley recently signed the letter of concern to the NZ government, along with 31 other Medical Professionals).

So could all of those 32 NZ Medical Professionals really be wrong or deranged in their thinking on the CV and the experimental jab? And what about these MDs from other places in the world warning us, ‘Do not get the COVID vaccine’ ? Or again, these 93 Israeli doctors?

The point is, whatever side of the fence you sit, in a democracy you used to be allowed to remain there … either side. That was your right. Not now. The agenda clearly is to sway you by fair means or foul. Dr Thornley has reaped the ‘foul’ by departing from ‘the acceptable narrative’.

We’re fast sliding into tyranny I’m afraid, and not everybody is noticing. We’ve already gone from ‘not mandatory’ to ‘no jab no job’ (for a select number … which I’ve no doubt will increase before too long). They really do want to vaccinate everybody here in NZ. Listen to former PM John Key speak at the link. He was in attendance at an Auckland conference recently, a catch phrase of which was ‘the year of the vaccine’. In a couple of months they are coming for your kids with the ‘safe & effective’ experimental jab that’s already seen more than 10K die following receipt.

(Not connected of course; just a coincidence).

Moving along.

LINKS BELOW ABOUT DR THORNLEY:

Dr. Simon Thornley – ‘An epidemiologist’s take on Covid-19’ (VIDEO)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=-cB_DEbXrhE&t=313s

Dr Simon Thornley on why he believes lockdown has been an overreaction
https://www.newstalkzb.co.nz/on-air/mike-hosking-breakfast/audio/dr-simon-thornley-on-why-he-believes-lockdown-has-been-an-overreaction/

Dr Simon Thornley on New Zealand’s Covid 19 Reponse: “Lockdown is not the answer”.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hnLKqDle0DY

___________________________________________________________________

MSM: tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes
https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/mainstream-media/

The link to Stuff’s vitriole is below:

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/coronavirus/125035835/the-scientist-and-the-rabbit-hole-how-epidemiologist-simon-thornley-became-an-outcast-of-his-profession?fbclid=IwAR34q1kURLkCwidXztJ6waAxqClHxElH1_nqXZICKQHtVNt2DEBXYsCzeOg

RELATED:

NZ Doctor: The Censorship Is Real (VIDEO)

Image by Thomas Wolter from Pixabay

Other recent headlines

An American paediatrician speaks about the CV VX
https://www.instagram.com/p/COwbmnQHA2r/?fbclid=IwAR0JmqZuoXZS-xvEtPvZ9OW2qXLuMY4b2bAwH_R-vY4RBa-63iffAc9c89E

The Deadly COVID-19 Vaccine Coverup
https://www.virginiastoner.com/writing/2021/5/4/the-deadly-covid-19-vaccine-coverup?fbclid=IwAR3HPWl-tzfk6DpPeLMWUm1i9_9CKBccvx8UhwrfbhQFuNrfuNexVUa7-BE

Rock and Roll Legend Eric Clapton Regrets COVID Shot, while Others Die Shortly After the Injections
https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/rock-and-roll-legend-eric-clapton-regrets-covid-shot-while-others-die-shortly-after-the-injections/

Mandatory mRNA in 2007 movie Vexille: Predictive Programming
https://ourgreaterdestiny.org/2021/05/mandatory-mrna-in-2007-movie-vexille-predictive-programming/

Thanks Kim
BRITISH HEALTH CARE EXECUTIVE SAYS BRITISH GOVERNMENT DID NOT INFECT ENOUGH PEOPLE WITH COVID (bitchute.com)

FREUDIAN SLIP? …NEWS REPORTER SAYS THAT THEY’RE RUNNING OUT OF PEOPLE WHO WANT TO BE EUTHANIZED (bitchute.com)

Image by Steve Buissinne from Pixabay

The CDC is Suppressing Data on Deaths and Injuries following CV Shots – How Many are Actually Dying from CV Shots?

From healthimpactnews.com

Albert Benavides has a Bitchute channel called WelcomeTheEagle88. Each week he does a deep dive into the data released by the CDC into VAERS. He records and stores everything, and has even found that the CDC removes records of deaths some weeks that were there in previous weeks.

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/the-cdc-is-suppressing-data-on-deaths-and-injuries-following-covid-bioweapon-shots-how-many-are-actually-dying-from-covid-shots/

Green Planet FM with Voices for Freedom NZ on the CV VX rollout – hear what mainstream is not telling you

From Green Planet FM with Tim Lynch. He is interviewing Alia Bee from voicesforfreedom.co.nz

Brief notes: “Brain aneurysms, strokes, anaphylaxis, fertility issues, brain fog, crippling headaches, ICU admissions, deaths. Huge scale of cover up. Looking for whistle blowers.

People in military really sick, nurses also, and not reporting to CARM.”

Much more discussed around the rollout, the fallout that is not allowed to be talked about. Doctors are being silenced. A must listen if you value fully informed consent.

Voices for Freedom is a fantastic resource. They are looking to join folk to the like minded to network & support each other. Also available at their site are informative printable fliers for you to read & print out to supply to others.

EWR

https://www.planetaudio.org.nz/listen/green-planet/discussions-on-green-topics/769272?fbclid=IwAR2B8Pgi6PUAYuoSoKsl_0pQLISPHwftFhTyG1bGoaQpVHI88NzRDu4rGsc

Image by sss sss from Pixabay