Tag Archives: Court

Court hears that harvesting fetal hearts requires the baby to be living: Daleiden tells of horror at discovery

An expert witness has told a San Francisco court that where fetal hearts are used in research they are harvested from living babies.

The shocking evidence was given by Dr. Theresa Deisher on the last day of the preliminary hearing of charges against undercover journalists David Daleiden and Sandra Merritt who have been charged with 14 felony counts of taping without consent.

Life Site News reports  that Daleiden testified that Deisher was one of the experts he consulted in 2012 about whether the hearts used in the study were harvested from living babies, and Deisher told him that was the case.

She confirmed that in her testimony this week as a defense expert witness.

Deisher, who holds a Ph.D. in Molecular and Cellular Physiology from Stanford University School of Medicine, told the court that a heart requires energy to relax after contracting, and if it contracts after it “runs out of energy,” it is useless for research.

READ MORE

LINK: https://gript.ie/court-hears-that-harvesting-fetal-hearts-requires-the-baby-to-be-living-daleiden-tells-of-horror-at-discovery/?fbclid=IwAR3_OyIpSljPZsn6cdxEqg6wllkCLMI5ho24FcYqeLBXQobRacaHigM1kUA

Did the UK settle this lawsuit to make sure the corruption of its COVID testing doesn’t come to light at trial?

Government to pay £2m to settle coronavirus testing case

The UK has agreed to settle a lawsuit over how it selected an IT contract for coronavirus testing at its Lighthouse labs.

The BBC understands that the settlement will cost the government up to £2m.

British company Diagnostics AI claimed it lost out to a European rival UgenTec despite spotting some positive coronavirus cases its rival missed.

It sued the government over the decision, claiming the selection process was “unfair and unlawful”.

Lighthouse labs are a UK-wide network of specialist coronavirus laboratories managed by the government and run by private firms. When the labs were set up, companies pitched to analyse the test results.

The dispute was due to be played out in court. It would have meant a public examination of the accuracy and speed of the testing system, at a time when it has come under serious criticism.

But the government has decided to settle the case and will pay Diagnostics AI compensation and most of its legal fees.

However, despite agreeing to the payout, the government has refuted the claims made by Diagnostics AI, saying they are “inaccurate”.

“The tests are reliable and effective, the laboratories that undertake them have been reviewed and assessed by experts and the percentage of false negatives or positives is tiny,” said a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson.

“This was a commercial dispute over a software contract where a number of factors were considered before it was awarded, which is still subject to final agreement over costs.”

As the contract was worth more than £1m, the BBC understands the settlement including legal costs could amount to around £2m.

Dispute over contract decision

Swabs are taken from people at testing sites or home tests and treated with a chemical process that produces a graph. The software is used to determine whether the graphs show the sample was positive or negative for coronavirus. Image copyright WPA Pool Image caption Software is used to analyse swabs to determine whether a sample is positive or negative for coronavirus

Diagnostics AI claimed UgenTec’s analysis of a trial run of 2,000 samples was flawed. In some cases, it claimed UgenTec found negative coronavirus results, when the results were actually positive or inconclusive.

“The system that they ultimately went with and decided to pay for missed around 50 out of 800 positive [results], so that’s around one in 15, or so, one in 16 – to be precise – positives,” Diagnostics AI’s chief executive Aron Cohen told the BBC.

“Obviously when that translates to hundreds of thousands of samples a day, that’s potentially thousands of missed positives going out every day. So that was really worrying for us.”

UgenTec in return claimed that no patients were affected at all as it was a trial run.

“We provide crucial covid interpretation services to the Lighthouse Labs to help them manage the vast amounts of data they generate. These claims are inaccurate and misleading,” UgenTec’s chief executive Steven Verhoeven told the BBC.

“None of these samples refer to actual results given to patients or the public and to imply any public health impact is wrong. Live tests were not being supported by our software at the time which was in the process of being implemented. As illustrated by independent tests, we have every confidence in our software and the services we provide.”

‘A commercial dispute’

Two non-profit companies owned and funded by the government were also sued by Diagnostics AI – namely UK Biocentre and Medicines Delivery Catapult (MDC), which ran the process to decide which company to use.

Court papers show that between 31 March and 14 April, Diagnostics AI repeatedly requested information about exactly what services were required and how their bid would be evaluated.

Diagnostics AI say it never received the information it asked for. This is refuted by UK Biocentre, which says both providers were given the same information. Image copyright NurPhoto Image caption Local authorities are permitted to purchase services without engaging in a competitive process if there is a significant risk to life

When the two bids were being considered in early April, the UK was facing what Boris Johnson had called a “moment of national emergency”.

In such urgent circumstances, the law does make provision for the government to buy services without a competitive process, if certain conditions are met.

However, it is understood that both Diagnostics AI and Ugentec had been recommended to UK Biocentre, and so a decision was made to evaluate both offers.

Diagnostics AI says this process was unfair and flawed, but UK Biocentre insists it was fair to both bidders.

A spokesperson for UK Biocentre said: “The allegations are groundless; this was a commercial dispute. The software in question is being used widely in the Lighthouse Laboratories, in some NHS laboratories and abroad.

“External quality assurance has confirmed that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in the Lighthouse Laboratories, of which the automated diagnostic software forms part, is performing well.”

A spokesperson for MDC also provided the BBC with a statement: “The full results of evaluation identified UgenTec as a safe and quality provider, able to deliver in high volumes, and with a comprehensive support system in place. It has performed superbly over the past six months, analysing over eight million test results for the nation. The litigation was purely a commercial dispute.”

The BBC understands that investigations were carried out into the claims made by Diagnostics AI, but concluded that concerns over the safety of UgenTec’s software were unsubstantiated.

The UK has agreed to settle a lawsuit over how it selected an IT contract for coronavirus testing at its Lighthouse labs.

The BBC understands that the settlement will cost the government up to £2m.

British company Diagnostics AI claimed it lost out to a European rival UgenTec despite spotting some positive coronavirus cases its rival missed.

It sued the government over the decision, claiming the selection process was “unfair and unlawful”.

Lighthouse labs are a UK-wide network of specialist coronavirus laboratories managed by the government and run by private firms. When the labs were set up, companies pitched to analyse the test results.

The dispute was due to be played out in court. It would have meant a public examination of the accuracy and speed of the testing system, at a time when it has come under serious criticism.

But the government has decided to settle the case and will pay Diagnostics AI compensation and most of its legal fees.

However, despite agreeing to the payout, the government has refuted the claims made by Diagnostics AI, saying they are “inaccurate”.

“The tests are reliable and effective, the laboratories that undertake them have been reviewed and assessed by experts and the percentage of false negatives or positives is tiny,” said a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson.

“This was a commercial dispute over a software contract where a number of factors were considered before it was awarded, which is still subject to final agreement over costs.”

As the contract was worth more than £1m, the BBC understands the settlement including legal costs could amount to around £2m.

Dispute over contract decision

Swabs are taken from people at testing sites or home tests and treated with a chemical process that produces a graph. The software is used to determine whether the graphs show the sample was positive or negative for coronavirus. Image copyright WPA Pool Image caption Software is used to analyse swabs to determine whether a sample is positive or negative for coronavirus

Diagnostics AI claimed UgenTec’s analysis of a trial run of 2,000 samples was flawed. In some cases, it claimed UgenTec found negative coronavirus results, when the results were actually positive or inconclusive.

“The system that they ultimately went with and decided to pay for missed around 50 out of 800 positive [results], so that’s around one in 15, or so, one in 16 – to be precise – positives,” Diagnostics AI’s chief executive Aron Cohen told the BBC.

“Obviously when that translates to hundreds of thousands of samples a day, that’s potentially thousands of missed positives going out every day. So that was really worrying for us.”

UgenTec in return claimed that no patients were affected at all as it was a trial run.

“We provide crucial covid interpretation services to the Lighthouse Labs to help them manage the vast amounts of data they generate. These claims are inaccurate and misleading,” UgenTec’s chief executive Steven Verhoeven told the BBC.

“None of these samples refer to actual results given to patients or the public and to imply any public health impact is wrong. Live tests were not being supported by our software at the time which was in the process of being implemented. As illustrated by independent tests, we have every confidence in our software and the services we provide.”

‘A commercial dispute’

Two non-profit companies owned and funded by the government were also sued by Diagnostics AI – namely UK Biocentre and Medicines Delivery Catapult (MDC), which ran the process to decide which company to use.

Court papers show that between 31 March and 14 April, Diagnostics AI repeatedly requested information about exactly what services were required and how their bid would be evaluated.

Diagnostics AI say it never received the information it asked for. This is refuted by UK Biocentre, which says both providers were given the same information. Image copyright NurPhoto Image caption Local authorities are permitted to purchase services without engaging in a competitive process if there is a significant risk to life

When the two bids were being considered in early April, the UK was facing what Boris Johnson had called a “moment of national emergency”.

In such urgent circumstances, the law does make provision for the government to buy services without a competitive process, if certain conditions are met.

However, it is understood that both Diagnostics AI and Ugentec had been recommended to UK Biocentre, and so a decision was made to evaluate both offers.

Diagnostics AI says this process was unfair and flawed, but UK Biocentre insists it was fair to both bidders.

A spokesperson for UK Biocentre said: “The allegations are groundless; this was a commercial dispute. The software in question is being used widely in the Lighthouse Laboratories, in some NHS laboratories and abroad.

“External quality assurance has confirmed that the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing in the Lighthouse Laboratories, of which the automated diagnostic software forms part, is performing well.”

A spokesperson for MDC also provided the BBC with a statement: “The full results of evaluation identified UgenTec as a safe and quality provider, able to deliver in high volumes, and with a comprehensive support system in place. It has performed superbly over the past six months, analysing over eight million test results for the nation. The litigation was purely a commercial dispute.”

The BBC understands that investigations were carried out into the claims made by Diagnostics AI, but concluded that concerns over the safety of UgenTec’s software were unsubstantiated.

However Mr Cohen disagrees: “The government is paying out a lot of money. And they’re paying this out, you know, to avoid it at least in part, to avoid having to have these issues aired in court, and to have discussions over the accuracy of the testing.”

SOURCE: https://www.bbc.com/news/business-54455666

VIA: http://markcrispinmiller.com/2020/10/uk-settles-lawsuit-to-make-sure-the-corruption-of-its-covid-testing-doesnt-come-to-light-at-trial/

Image by Paweł Szymczuk from Pixabay

Image by Gordon Johnson from Pixabay


A REMINDER: a 2018 court case revealed there’s been no quality control over vaccines manufactured by Big Pharma over the past three decades

A reminder also … the CDC is not an independent government agency, it is a private subsidiary of Big Pharma … go figure … EWR

 

From worldhealth.net
Posted on Feb 08, 2019, 7 p.m.

Del Bigtree and RFK Jr. have been credited for the 2018 landmark lawsuit victory in which the demand for relevant government documents proving that all federally approved vaccines had been tested for quality and safety over the past 32 years be presented had not been met in a court of law.

The court case has revealed that there has been no quality control over vaccines that have been manufactured by Big Pharma over the past three decades. There are legal and practical implications for this legal victory for American citizens, and it means that the American people have been lied to for 32 years about the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. The five healthcare agencies now in doubt for complicit and neglect of doing their jobs are the CDC, FDA, IOM, NIH, and DHHS itself as a result.

The July 2018 lawsuit showed vaccine makers had been exempt from what every other pharmaceutical drug manufacturer has been forced to do concerning biennial recertification for quality and effectiveness; meaning their vaccines had not been tested for quality and have had no proven safety or effectiveness testing for over 30+ years.

This case can now be legally cited by all citizens, employees, and parents who are being mandated by any government, organizational regulation or requirements that they must be or have their children vaccinated for school, work, or any other activity to stop forcing vaccination.

Additionally this case can now be legally cited for any seeking compensation for a vaccine injury, making it likely that the big pharma vaccine industry may be in hit with many lawsuits which could lead to being bankrupted out of existence; much like Bayer-Monsanto after the landmark legal victory won by the dying San Francisco landscaper, and their stock value plummeting precipitously.

As result of this landmark lawsuit victory the future of allopathic medicine as it stands is under scrutiny and in doubt, as well as the global pharma cartel since most drugs prescribed by come from pharma corporations that have been involved. Existence of deep state corporate mainstream news media will also be endangered as 70% of their income comes from the global pharma cartel.

Officials who passed laws to legalize vaccination at state, national, or at international levels, or have otherwise aided and abetted this vaccine fraud may now be legally charged with fraud, criminal malfeasance, and in some cases under the Nuremberg Code possibly war crimes.

The following comes from a letter written by Dawn Bell, a health professional warning that vaccines are no longer safe and have become ineffective after 10 years, who claims her daughter was injured by vaccination:

100% of the mumps cases were college students who were ALL 100% vaccinated in the recent mumps outbreak; and 90% of the people who died from last years flu epidemic had received the flu shot.

Herd immunity is achieved when 85% of the population is immune to a disease; vaccines are only good for around 10 years to 20 years max, most people over the age of 20 are not immune any longer creating a false immunity; and people who catch chicken pox are immune for life; those who get vaccinated are not.

Vaccines can and have saved lives, but when MD’s were handing out antibiotics were given out like movie popcorn they started to have a bad effect on the immune system, it’s very probable to think the same thing can happen with overuse of vaccines.

For deadly diseases, I’m for it, but they started to make so much money from it all of the sudden there was a vaccine for everything, and it was made mandatory, even for everyday childhood diseases and stuff such as Hep B at one day old.

When 32 people got sick from E.coli the FDA told everyone to stop buying romaine lettuce, yet thousands have reported issue with vaccine and it becomes pay no attention to the man behind the curtain, then when people get upset and start asking question everyone is surprised.

I am an Occupational Therapist and was all in with vaccinations, until I had to watch my daughter lose speech ability directly following a vaccine. Up until that point I was another person telling everyone it was a coincidence, until I saw it happen with my own eyes to my own child. Safety studies have never been done in these vaccine, and they have NEVER been studied being given all at once as they do.

It is common sense all of these vaccines given to children with developing immune system and neuro system that there may be some issues. When they say safety studies have been done, when they were asked in court for them and no one could produce them, of course Kenedy won the lawsuit.

My OBGYN told me the flu shot was studied and proven safe during pregnancy, I went into work and looked at the flu insert to find it clearly stated it had not been studied in children and pregnant women and if given to pregnant women you should call and add them to a registry, also on the front of the box it states not to give to children under the age of 5.

If you have not watched the CDC video approving the Hep vaccination you should as it is interesting. In the video it is given to 1 day old newborn babies and it has not been approved for those under the age of 18. When asked if it is safe to give with other vaccines they said they don’t know, but were making the assumption it was generally safe like other vaccines. When asked about the “new mutated gene thing” they replied the same of making the assumption that it’s safe like other vaccines.  When asked about heart and autoimmune markers seen in their internal study they acknowledged they saw the markers and were going to monitor it and make a determination December 2020 whether or not there was a problem, but in the meantime it is being given to day old newborn babies. Yes, there are concerns that need to be addressed about safety, and I am thrilled that they may finally be addressed.”

https://www.worldhealth.net/news/landmark-lawsuit/

SOURCE

https://www.worldhealth.net/news/landmark-lawsuit/

 

Image by HeungSoon from Pixabay

Judge REFUSES to gag anti-5G street light campaigner, stating: ‘The public have a right to know’

From chroniclelive.co.uk

A judge has refused to ‘gag’ an-anti 5G lighting campaigner, ruling the issue SHOULD be debated.

Mark Steele claims 5G kills babies and causes cancer, and believes it’s secretly being used in Gateshead.

The council denies this and applied for an injunction to limit what the 57-year-old could even post online about 5G.

But Recorder Nolan QC said he refused to ‘gag’ him, adding: “The public have a right to know.”

Outside the court, protesters – some dressed like World War One soldiers – used microphones to air their 5G concerns.

Inside the court, a packed gallery – including a small child – heard claims Steele had harassed an array of council staff and councillors.

It heard Steele accused one worker of “crimes against humanity” for their involvement with the lights.

One was branded a “murdering c***” while another, repairing a streetlight, was called a “baby killer”, the court was told.

“I said do you know [the lights] are capable of killing babies,” Steele recalled in his evidence on Thursday.

He claims that worker, like several of the alleged harassment victims, “laughed” at him.

And speaking after the Newcastle County Court hearing, Steele said he’s aware he’s been ridiculed at times for his beliefs.

These, the court heard, include claims 5G is linked to birds and bees dying across Gateshead.

“I don’t blame anyone for laughing,” he told ChronicleLive.

“I’m an expert in this particular field and I find it unbelievable and I don’t expect anyone not find it nonsensical.

“But this is happening.”

But now Steele has offered an olive branch to Gateshead Council, urging bosses to sit down and discuss the issue with him.

The council has strenuously denied secretly using 5G – most notably in an infamous viral Facebook post.

And despite not being ‘gagged’, the judge did impose three conditions on Steele as part of a watered down two-year injunction.

During the hearing, Steel had denied the council’s claim his behaviour had gone over the top.

Outside, he said he had “acted proportionally”.

“The children in my locality are bleeding from the nose – they are suffering from this technology,” claimed the Percy Gardens inventor.

In court, he claimed a series of boffins – including some at the prestigious Harvard University – now support his 5G fears.

Gateshead Council previously dismissed them as “entirely false”.

The conditions prohibit him from breaking harassment laws and limit who he can film.

The interim order imposed in July was much tougher – restricting what he could post on Facebook.

Imposing the new order, Recorder Nolan warned him: “I’m not going to give you a gagging order – I’m just going to ask you to behave yourself.”

“We don’t know how these conspiracy stories start, but we are happy to report that this is exactly what these are,” they wrote in a Facebook statement in April.

“These tales are completely untrue and you should ignore them.

“Please be assured that there is no scientific basis or credible evidence for any of these scare stories about street lights causing cancer and other illnesses.”

Science or not, Recorder Nolan said Steele had put a “tremendous amount of research” into the 5G debate and that his voice should be allowed to be heard.

“It is an area which I can accept there is an area of public concern,” he added.

“And the public have a right to know – this is a free country.”

 

SEE SOURCE FOR VIDEO & PHOTOS

https://www.chroniclelive.co.uk/news/north-east-news/mark-steele-5g-gateshead-council-15269240

In 2018 one of DoC’s security guards is caught on camera assaulting an environmentalist

So this assault in 2018 was unprovoked, had two witnesses, all on camera, was dismissed by the judge & the person assaulted is left with some $24K in costs. Do you think ‘they’ might be sending environmentalists a message here? Remember how in another Court scenario regarding the 1080 drop around Auckland’s Hunua Ranges water supply, DoC’s lawyers asked the judge that their scientist not be questioned? Strange request isn’t it? And equally strange that any judge would grant such a request don’t you think?

assault4
Graeme Sturgeon, photographed after the assault clearly showing the injuries he sustained, a bloodied nose & torn shirt

This man simply showed up where bags of 1080 pellets were being unloaded (without compliance to all of the safety regulations). A Class 1A Ecotoxin was being stored without public knowledge in the CBD of Whitianga, right adjacent to peoples’ homes and to food outlets. To read more on that debacle go here.

assault2.jpg
1080 pellets being unloaded in Whitianga’s CBD

Observing DoC’s guards in the header image above it seems a far cry from conservation & saving birds doesn’t it? Especially when you hear their 1080 poison was responsible for killing 10K birds in one of their South Island drops alone. I could mention more like the 600 odd sheep and the 345 deer as well. DoC’s operations are frequently looking very gung ho. Environmentalists simply want an end to all of the poison & the accusations of violence by them are simply wild exaggerations.

There are better ways to conserve our environment. They are dropping this poison aerially in places that are easily trapped. They are also wiping out our native birds. The birds fared very well prior to poison & particularly prior, I would venture to say,  to the presence of the poisoners. Witness the extinction of the native Huia. And now we have the Kea near to extinction.

Really, what have they learned in 60 plus years of poisoning?

Watch the GrafBoys’ coverage of this incident in the video below:

Published on Feb 20, 2018

Graeme Sturgeon vs the Crown – On the 20th February 2018, in the Thames District Court, Graeme Sturgeon had charges made against him by the Crown, dismissed. Here’s his post-decision interview ..


RELATED:

Remember this? (As the media continues to assault the truth with more claims of violence):

Some truth on the alleged threats to DoC staff: an OIA request to Police reveals 9 in the last 31 months, DoC says 93 last month
Photos supplied by Carol Sawyer

A Mother believes the antidepressant Zoloft was the cause of her daughter’s death

These are medicated times, especially for our young people. Children are the (not so) new target for big Pharma. Here a family lost their precious daughter. Be vigilant and watch what your kids are being prescribed or even if a prescription is necessary. Research the independent data, particularly the side effects of any proposed prescription. Parents are finding out the hard way on Gardasil with three deaths already here in NZ. Informed choice is paramount.

This story is from prepforthat.com

Mathy Downing’s 12-year-old, Candace, was a far cry from a problem child. Downing describes her as having been “compassionate” and athletic. Candace was a member of her school’s swim and lacrosse teams. But when her pediatrician recommended that the family place her under the care of a psychiatrist, life changed in terrible fashion for the family.

“She was never depressed,” said Andy Downing, her father. “She had anxieties from testing at school. Had a lot of friends. Played basketball on a team. And I just kept asking myself over and over again, ‘This doesn’t make sense.’ Twelve-year-old girls don’t hang themselves.”

READ MORE

https://prepforthat.com/antidepressant-suicide-side-effects-downing-family/

Fight against 1080 goes to Te Taitokerau Māori Land Court

A must watch is yesterday’s interview of Alan Gurden & Emille Leaf. They refer to the problems raised in this article that 1080 is purportedly addressing.

The article below is from Herald:

An urgent injunction has been lodged in the Māori Land Court Te Taitokerau to stop the Department of Conservation making 1080 drops over public or private land.

The injunction was accepted at the Te Taitokerau land court in Whangārei on Thursday afternoon on the grounds of the urgency of the case, said a spokesman for the applicants.

The injunction will be considered today.

Lodged by Northland men Riki Ngatoki and Hayward Brown, it was prepared with the help of Nga Tikanga Māori Law Society Inc.

The Department of Conservation (DoC) is due to drop 1080 poison over Russell State Forest and part of Cape Brett in the next two weeks, weather permitting, after laying taster bait last week.

A spokeswoman said a copy of the injunction was delivered to the Whangārei office late last week.

DoC has called off all planned drops until the outcome of the injunction is known, she said. DoC could not comment further while the matter was in that process.

The injunction did not specify the Northland drops but applied to the use of 1080 anywhere over Māori land in New Zealand, Ngatoki said.

Another case is expected to be heard in the Environment Court this week, lodged by Auckland opponents of 1080 trying to stop a drop in the Hunua Ranges.

But Nga Tikanga Māori Law considers the matter its injunction is based on is about land and ownership rights.

It is understood Māori Land Court injunction refers to land boundaries and legal descriptions in the intended Northland drop zone.

Ngatoki said the underlying argument is about returning to tangata whenua the right to say what happens on Māori-owned land. He said poisoning the land and water was not part of the values of past generations or of tikanga Māori.

READ MORE

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=12129942

Photo: Carol Sawyer

A court case for alleged assault is dismissed by the judge yet incurs a cost of $22K+ to the victim – a very clear message here regarding any opposition to 1080

Graeme Sturgeon, a man who was assaulted, then himself charged with assault, and the case subsequently dismissed, is now faced with costs of $22K.  For more background on the story go to this link. EnvirowatchRangitikei

STATE CORRUPTION – WHAT WOULD YOU DO IN GRAEME’S PLACE ?

MEMORANDUM IN RESPECT OF GRAEME STURGEON AND REMEDIES AGAINST DOC FOR ASSAULT ON 17 OCTOBER 2017 – WHITIANGA, COROMANDEL

By Carol Sawyer

Here attached is the legal advice Graeme Sturgeon received today from his barrister Greg Bradford about ways forward. I have both Graeme and his barrister Greg Bradford’s permission ( via Graeme ) to make this public.

It’s longish but I urge you to read it. It has huge ramifications for any dealings we have with the courts with regard to fighting 1080.

Graeme is contemplating his options.

This is an extremely interesting memorandum ! It is impressively honest, and very sobering.

Please note Option 2 in particular. Here is an excerpt from Option 2 – “Par for course in this situation DOC, armed with lots of resources, would try and “burn you off” by taking every procedural step available, appeal every procedural step if possible and protract the proceedings so that you cannot bear the costs of continuing the same.”

So… Graeme Sturgeon gets assaulted by a DoC security guard in a completely unprovoked attack. His legal bill, for two court hearings and a two-day trial is $22,338.75 up to this point.

One hundred of us, exactly, have put $10,100 towards this cost, ( $9150 via the Givealittle campaign, and $950 privately ).

The government has ROBBED US ALL !

Graeme has been assaulted, and then robbed of a large amount of money – by our government’s actions.

The judge dismissed the case, but Graeme and his wife Julie went through what they say is ” the worst three months” of their lives, and have a massive legal bill to show for it. Bear in mind NO COSTS WERE AWARDED !

It should also be remembered that without the security footage showing what happened, Graeme would more than likely have been convicted. DoC were legally obliged to supply that footage within 21 days. It took them three months to do so. Until virtually the last minute before the two day trial they would only supply six seconds of the 15 minute footage, showing Graeme flailing his arms at the security guard ( but not connecting ), in an attempt to show Graeme was attacking guard Lane.

This delay in getting much needed evidence on Graeme and his lawyer’s part added hugely to the financial burden.

READ THE MEMORANDUM:

1.Graeme Sturgeons lawyers memo

2. Graeme Sturgeons lawyers memo

3.Graeme Sturgeons lawyers memo

Photos :

1.Graeme after the assault, when he had been hauled from his vehicle by security guard, Richard Lane, in an unprovoked attack, in a public carpark, with no signs saying ” Keep Out’ and in total darkness.
2.The Memorandum from barrister Greg Bradford

Court upholds $50 million award for girl whose life was destroyed by Johnson & Johnson’s Children’s Motrin

This case is shocking. As I recall, Johnson & Johnson was always a trusted brand. I spoke recently with some women in their senior years who all nodded at that name as being trusted. Trust unfortunately is a word that doesn’t feature so prominently nowadays. Corporations regularly fail in their promises it seems … and if you doubt this please watch the doco entitled ‘The Corporation’. You will find it here on the Corporations page. It will explain to you how this all happened … how a corporation functions … to whom its first loyalties are. Be aware, it is not you, the customer by any stretch of the imagination. And so here, we have a big corporation being ordered to pay $50 million to an injured child, when in the bigger picture, in light of the profits made, that sum of money is not all that large. And not compared to the suffering this child and her family have endured. As always with these sad and unfortunate stories, we need to be aware to read the very fine print and do our own private research on medications. The information is there but is seldom given to us unless requested.

“(NaturalNews) The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court upheld a lower court’s judgment that pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson should be required to pay $50 million to a girl who suffered a rare but devastating side effect from Children’s Motrin when she was seven years old. The judgment took more than a decade to be reached.

Samantha Reckis experienced toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which burned off 90 percent of her skin, destroyed 80 percent of her lung capacity and left her blind. Only luck and the efforts of her doctors prevented her from dying or suffering permanent brain damage…”

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/049752_Childrens_Motrin_lawsuit_Johnson_&.html#ixzz3adzuSt3h