Tag Archives: Comirnaty

NZ Lawyer Sue Grey: OPEN LETTER TO PRIME MINISTER (NO2, 3 June 2021)

From: Sue Grey suegreylawyer@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021, 23:33
Subject: OPEN LETTER No 2- An URGENT REQUEST FOLLOWING RESEARCH SHOWING THE “S PROTEIN” IN THE PFIZER JAB IS A TOXIN
To: Rt Hon Jacinda Ardern jacinda.ardern@parliament.govt.nz, Hon David Parker david.parker@parliament.govt.nz, Hon Andrew Little andrew.little@parliament.govt.nz, Hon Chris Hipkins chris.hipkins@parliament.govt.nz, ashley_bloomfield@moh.govt.nz, Chris James Chris.James@health.govt.nz, ayesha.verrall@parliament.govt.nz

Dear Prime Minister, Attorney-General, Minister of Health, Minister of Covid, Minister or Seniors, Director General of Health and Chris
I attach below some new and very important research which I must assume your advisors have not yet provided to you, or the experimental Pfizer injection rollout would surely already have been suspended. It is now clearly established that the SProtein is a toxin that causes the harmful symptoms known as “Covid”. I surely don’t need to explain the legal, ethical and human rights consequences of a government knowingly promoting a program which intentionally injects a life threatening toxin into healthy people.
I also attach a report indicating that injected nanoparticles (and the SProtein) do not remain in the arm muscle but instead circulate throughout the whole body.
The combined effect is that the Pfizer jab injects mRNA to take over cells to manufacture the deadly SProtein toxin and this spread throughout much of the body, manufacturing the SProtein toxin for days and in some cases many weeks.
This explains why even the limited available research from the two months of study as summarised in the Comirnaty Data Sheet identifies possible harm to many different parts of the body including the heart, blood, brain, musculoskeletal system, nervous system, fainting and dizziness etc.
This is no longer just a shocking experiment. Everyone involved is now on notice of this “injection roulette” which may result in death or serious injury to previously healthy people. The health and safety implications for employers and those who push this jab, are significant. No post injection death can legitimately be ruled out as being caused or contributed by the injection, at least not without a full coroner’s report. Certainly any post vax stroke, heart attack, other blood disorder, nervous system disorder or even suicide or car accident (known overseas as “vaccidents”) must prima facie be assumed to be caused or contributed to by the jab, at least until a full coroners report is undertaken. Similarly it is not good enough to claim that our seniors who die post jab were frail and likely to die. Surely if they were that frail they should have been spared from the jab. Anyway, surely “deaths post Jab” should be treated consistently with “deaths post Covid”.
Despite the secretive, flawed and very passive official post jab injury reporting process ( CARM), and as a result of the more active community led follow up, you are already on notice of a number of deaths and life threatening and life changing harm from this injection. The deaths and harm will inevitably continue if there are any further injections. Perhaps initially you had an excuse that you thought the SProtein was “safe”. However now you are on notice that it is not “safe” by any definition.
Further, although you in privileged position are on notice, many members of the public who you were elected to represent remain deceived by misleading claims in crown propaganda that the jab is “safe and effective”. In these circumstances there can be no “Informed consent”., Each jab without Informed consent is in breach of the Health and Disability Code and is an assault.
In these circumstances, the ongoing program is surely criminal, and indeed may result in Homicide as defined by the Crimes Act:
158 Homicide defined

Homicide is the killing of a human being by another, directly or indirectly, by any means whatsoever.

Compare: 1908 No 32 s 173

Anyone who aids, abets or otherwise incites homicide is a party to that homicide.

Is Covid-19 really the most serious health issue for 100 years?
I note that the Director-General of Health has shared his view in sworn evidence that Covid is the most serious health issue for New Zealand in 100 years.
I invite you all to consider that claim very carefully and critically. Please put Covid in perspective against the many other challenges which we face, including for example heart attacks, strokes, cancer, suicide accidents and diabetes and the nitrate and other contamination of much of our water.
Surely you must agree that the harm is not from “Covid” but from the “Response to Covid”.
The best expert evidence is that the risk from Covid is similar to the risk from influenza. Many experts are now saying that Covid is simply a rebranding of influenza and colds, supported by PCR testing that was never intended as a diagnostic tool. The WHO says that PCR testing should not be used beyond 20-25 cycles. OIA responses indicate that in NZ PCR tests use up to 45 cycles, which simply multiplies any contamination.

Our government is about to enter dangerous new phase if it proceeds to inject more healthy New Zealanders with an injection that experts have established is toxic.
Apart from the direct harm to those who choose, or are bullied to accept this injection, there is considerable peripheral harm. This includes the contamination of our Blood Bank with SProtein. We can only speculate on the risks for vulnerable people who receive blood contaminated with this toxin.
Please stop and reflect. Please listen to international experts who are independent from Big Pharma and who are not invested in the Covid paradigm. Please listen to the New Zealand scientific and medical experts who have put their careers and reputations on the line out of extreme concern. Please correct the misinformation that this injection is “safe and effective” and “approved by Medsafe” when in fact it did not meet the statutory criteria that “benefit exceeds risk”.
There is no imminent health risk from suspending the program. Dr Bloomfield’s sworn evidence was that the risks were mainly financial and reputational.
Please find the courage to challenge whoever is driving this, and any who act on dogma rather than evidence, reason or ethics. The future of New Zealand depends on your courage to step up and make this critical call for our people.
I urge you to listen, engage and act in the public interest.
Please put aside your pride and the dogma, and suspend this program.

I am happy to assist however I can.

Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc (Biochemistry and Microbiology), RSHDipPHI
Nelson, NZ
pH +64 22 6910586 Co-leader NZ Outdoors Party suegreylawyer@gmail.com sue.grey@outdoorsparty.co.nz
http://www.suegrey.co.nz

Here are some useful references:

  1. THIS IS THE JAPANESE STUDY REFERENCED BY DR BYRAM BRIDLE. HOWEVER IN JAPANESE. English at the end. Pfizer document.

https://www.pmda.go.jp/drugs/2021/P20210212001/672212000_30300AMX00231_I100_1.pdf——————————————————-

ARTICLE EXPLAINING IT.

https://agrdailynews.com/2021/06/02/dr-byram-bridle-a-virologist-and-immunologist-says-peer-reviewed-journals-report-injected-covid-19-spike-proteins-are-a-toxin-and-pathogenic-protein-accumulating-in-organs-including-spleen-bone-ma/—————————–

DR. Byram Bridle, We Made a Big Mistake, 7 minute video

https://www.bitchute.com/video/gqzHu8SP5VqJ/—————————————

  1. Salk Institute pdf

https://www.salk.edu/news-release/the-novel-coronavirus-spike-protein-plays-additional-key-role-in-illness/————————————————

  1. International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research

“Worse than the Disease” pdf

https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23

Sue Grey LLB (Hons), BSc
PO Box 1653 Nelson, NZ
pH +64 22 6910586 suegreylawyer@gmail.com
http://www.suegrey.co.nz

SOURCE:

http://suegrey.co.nz/index.php/2021/06/05/open-letter-to-prime-minister-no2-3-june-2021/

An open letter signed by 32 NZ Medical professionals expresses concerns about the Pfizer ‘Comirnaty’ investigational vaccine for CV-19

NZ DOCTORS OPEN LETTER OF CONCERN
Letter by NZ Doctors with Concerns Over Pfizer Vaccine April 27, 2021OPEN LETTER BY NZ MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS
…… SHARING CONCERNS ABOUT PFIZER ‘COMIRNATY’ INVESTIGATIONAL VACCINE FOR COVID-19

We write formally to express our shared concern that:
A new prescription only medicine with s23(1) provisional approval, which legally can only be for the treatment of a limited number of patients, is being promoted for the entire adult population of Aotearoa/New Zealand.
Medsafe asked 58 questions, but the answers for most of these are not due until March to July 2021.
The clinical trials will not be completed until 2023.
Nobody currently knows how safe or effective this novel mRNA technology is in the medium to long term, but highly credible medical experts around the world, and even some vaccine developers themselves, are predicting problems and raising urgent red-flag concerns.
If any safety issues are identified in the remaining period of the trials the effects could be catastrophic for our community or a proportion that have already received the vaccine.
The signatories are mindful of their obligations to discuss risks, benefits and uncertainties of any treatment and to ensure informed consent of all patients before giving any treatment and of the other important obligations under the Code of Health and Disability Services Consumers Rights. Our insurers have affirmed this obligation.
Compelling patients or workers to receive drug, medicine or vaccine which is still investigational would set a significant medical precedent, which would run counter to all international codes of medical ethics since the Nuremberg Code of 1947 and Declaration of Helsinki in 1952. The fundamental tenets of these include complete disclosure of the risks and unknowns to the participants in medical experiments; the obligations on the experimenter for care and after-care of adverse outcomes; and the freedom from coercion, stand over tactics and over-reach. This would seem to include threats of job loss, travel bans etc. Many patients feel pressured to accept this vaccine in the mistaken belief they may protect others due to representations in the media and/ or pressure from their employers, and that they may lose their employment or may be disadvantaged in their employment if they do not accept this experimental vaccine.
The signatories are concerned to ensure that the Ministry of Health, College of GPs and the Medical Council of NZ are aware of the above concerns, and that they are addressed with urgency to ensure the way the vaccine is being promoted to healthy people who do not require treatment is both lawful and represents best practice. We are eager to clarify that any patients injured by the vaccine will have acknowledgement and cover from ACC.
The signatories note that even the promoters of the vaccine do not claim that it prevents transmission and that public representations that the vaccine is effective for this purpose are misleading.
We do not accept that lay vaccinators are qualified or competent to partake in the process of informed consent to patients re this vaccine, especially as they have no medical expertise and no prior knowledge of the individual circumstances of the patient or their health issues. Any risk benefit assessment and consideration of alternatives is complex and requires a considered consultation by a qualified practitioner.

Ref: Informed consent disclosure to vaccine trial subjects of risk of COVID-19 vaccines worsening clinical disease. Int J Clin Pract 2021:75e13795.
Signed:
NAMES AND MEDICAL COUNCIL REGISTRATION NUMBERS
Matt Shelton 17031
Anne O’Reilly 23539
Anna Goodwin 48183
Paul Butler 10712
Caroline Wheeler 17374
Tracy Chapman 29070
Tessa Jones 08775
Ulrich Doering 16398
Aida Hasbun 70825
Adeline Lee 22765
Cindy De Villiers 20053
Damian Wojcik 10754
Rob Maunsell 08554
Wellington Tan 09716
Simon Thornley 23706
Fred M. Timmermans, MSC, Dental Surgeon (Picton),HPI no 18BRMD
Rene de Monchy 08986
Mike Godfrey 07144
Samantha Bailey 40705
Emanuel E Garcia 40834
William J Reeder 07018
Sheetal Patel 27638
Graham H. Evans 36808
Tihomir Djordjic 23070
Matthius Seidel 32235
Elizabeth Harris 18284
Robin Kelly 10370
Reuben Tomlinson 40821
Anna Harvey 15766
Kate Armstrong 22941
Stephen Joe 11754
Fraser Burling 18908

SOURCE

If your employer is claiming the vax is safe you might like to ask about risks identified by Medsafe

From Sue Grey, NZ Lawyer, LLB(Hons), BSc (Biochemistry & Microbiology), RSHDipPHI (at Facebook)

If your employer is claiming the VAX is safe you might like to ask about risks identified by Medsafe in this report by the Medicines Adverse Reactions Committee. These serious issues were identified and discussed 20 Jan 2021. Bizarre these minutes were not published until 13April 2021. You can now get the report from Medsafe’s website.

If your boss asks you to get vaccinated – from NZ lawyer Sue Grey

Sue Grey 310 subscribers

Sue Grey LLB(Hons), BSC(Biochemistry & Microbiology) specialist in emerging issues talks about some of the concerns about the experimental Pfizer Comirnaty “covid” injection and your rights if you wish to refuse this.