Tag Archives: blindness

The Ivermectin Story you are not supposed to know about (2 short must-see videos)


Part 1: https://vimeo.com/513325468

Part 2: https://vimeo.com/norbertszolnoky

Note: should these get pulled from VIMEO, here is an alternative link: https://www.bitchute.com/video/znldJCBnEBeC/

NOTICE: This video contains ALL factual information, sourced and verifiable, about drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Ivermectin is NOT officially approved by the FDA as a COVID-19 treatment in the United States, nor by the EMA in the European Union. It is approved and used in several other countries around the world. The NIH (National Institute of Health) in the US takes a neutral stand, “neither for nor against” using it for COVID-19 treatment. In the United States Ivermectin can be used as an off-label drug prescribed by a licensed physician.
DISCLAIMER: Nothing in this video is intended as a medical advice, only as an information. For all medical advice and treatment, you should consult your own physician.
The Ivermectin Story – Part 1: https://vimeo.com/513325468 RESOURCES mentioned in or connected to this video:
– NIH Treatment Panel financial disclosures https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/panel-financial-disclosure/
– NIH Treatment Panel chairs and roster https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/panel-roster/
– NEJM Remdesivir paper (shows “reduced time to viral clearance and of hospital stay”; see the financial interests of the authors [NIH]): https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764
– Disclosure forms for the Remdesivir paper: https://www.nejm.org/doi/suppl/10.1056/NEJMoa2007764/suppl_file/nejmoa2007764_disclosures.pdf
– WHO Solidarity Trial (Remdesivir, HCQ, lopinavir, and interferon beta-1a): Remdesivir had no positive effect on mortality https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2023184 – Uttar Pradesh covid stats https://www.bing.com/covid/local/uttarpradesh_india?vert=graph
– Three connected websites about Ivermectin, maintained by scientists and researchers (numbers as of 03/31/2021):
1. All the publicly available completed scientific studies, listed in details – so far 80 studies: https://c19ivermectin.com
2. The real-time meta-analysis of all the studies using controls (OS – observational studies, és RCT – randomized controlled trials) – so far 48 studies: https://ivmmeta.com
3. Global Ivermectin adoption status for COVID-19 by countries: https://ivmstatus.com
FURTHER INFORMATION on the concerted effort to suppress the information on Ivermectin:
– NIH negative Ivermectin view – issues: https://trialsitenews.com/the-ivermectin-recommendation-was-a-deception/https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/FLCCC-Alliance-Response-to-the-NIH-Guideline-Committee-Recommendation-on-Ivermectin-use-in-COVID19-2021-01-18.pdf – The concerted push to smear Ivermectin by threatened special interest: https://trialsitenews.com/fda-now-cautions-against-ivermectin-the-vested-interests-are-circling-the-wagons/https://trialsitenews.com/ivermectin-fails-to-statistically-beat-placebo-in-columbian-study-mass-media-finally-takes-notice-an-interesting-observation/https://trialsitenews.com/the-war-on-misinformation-claims-two-victims-truth-and-the-right-to-treatment/
Two other good articles about the real facts on Ivermectin and why it’s being censored: – Dr. Kory’s article on RealClear Politics: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2021/03/10/censorship_kills_the_shunning_of_a_covid_therapeutic_145376.html – Why Isn’t Ivermectin Being Widely Researched and Utilized? https://trialsitenews.com/why-isnt-ivermectin-being-widely-researched-and-utilized/
– Problems with the Soto Becerra study (the only study showing negative Ivermectin effects, yet cited by NIH and others to reject Ivermectin) https://trialsitenews.com/missing-data-in-soto-becerra-et-al-the-one-study-showing-worse-outcomes-with-ivermectin/https://trialsitenews.com/systemic-unreported-protocol-violations-in-key-ivermectin-study/


From markcrispinmiller.com
Peer-reviewed study finds that Ivermectin kills SARS-CoV-2, and immunize against further infection by Mark Crispin Miller (09 May 2021 18:50 EDT)

From the conclusion:
When the effectiveness of ivermectin for the COVID-19 pandemic is confirmed with the cooperation of researchers around the world and its clinical use is achieved on a global scale, it could prove to be of great benefit to humanity. It may even turn out to be comparable to the benefits achieved from the discovery of penicillin—said to be one of the greatest discoveries of the twentieth century. Here, one more use for ivermectin, which has been described as [a] “miracle” or “wonder”166) drug, is being added. History has demonstrated that the existence of such natural product-derived compounds with such diverse effects is exceedingly rare.  However, in order to pass on to posterity the fact that ivermectin has become widely used to control the world-shattering COVID-19 pandemic, only one simple action is required: the addition of only one word, “COVID-19”, to the 9th item (of the 11 listed) under the “Antiviral” category in the “Ivermectin: The Future” section of the Nobel Lectureʼs record167) entitled “Splendid Gift from the Earth”.

EWR’s other posts on Ivermectin:

EWR Note: I noted in the comments with these videos someone has posted a link from wikipedia debunking Ivermectin. Wiki has long been a controlled source of info maintaining the mainstream narrative.

See: Wikipedia co-founder: “Wikipedia is broken,” run by bad actors and special interests to smear all voices of dissent

I have watched (and shared here) several MDs posting videos on this treatment as well as Hydroxychloroquine – of how they treated their own patients with great success. And Facebook of course pulls anything to do with either of those treatments if they claim cure.

I hope you are getting the (not pretty) picture.

WHO & UNICEF recommend vitamin A be administered to children with measles

“Several recent investigations have indicated that vitamin A treatment of children with measles in developing countries has been associated with reductions in morbidity and mortality. The World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF) issued a joint statement recommending that vitamin A be administered to all children diagnosed with measles in communities where vitamin A deficiency (serum vitamin A <10 µg/dL) is a recognized problem and where mortality related to measles is ≥1%. The recommended regimen is 100 000 IU by mouth at the time of diagnosis for infants younger than 12 months of age, and 200 000 IU for older children.”


Vitamin A Treatment of Measles

Let’s move on to vitamin A in the treatment of measles and the prevention of severe cases of measles. Lets start as well with some background on the lack of major media attention to this actually important issue of vitamin A in the treatment of measles. In fact vitamin A is much more important than the dangerous MMR vaccination. Vitamin C is also anti-viral. If you combined vitamin A with highly absorbable liposomic encapsulated vitamin C you could likely avoid any chance of getting severe measles and with any resulting complications. Then you as well will have immune system beneficial life time immunity. No vaccine can do that. See as well the vitamin C pages here on this site.


Image by emrah özaras from Pixabay

A world class expert on photobiology, shares the hidden dangers of LED lighting to our health that most people are unaware of

“I call these LEDs Trojan horses because they appear so practical to us. They appear to have so many advantages. They save energy; are solid state and very robust,. So we invited them into our homes. But we are not aware that they have many stealth health-robbing properties, which are harmful to your biology, harmful to your mental health, harmful to your retinal health, and also harmful to your hormonal or endocrine health,”

From Dr Mercola


  • Near-infrared is important as it primes the cells in your retina for repair and regeneration, which explains why LEDs — which is devoid of infrared — are so harmful for your eyes and health
  • One-third of the energy your body consumes comes from the food you eat. The vast majority of the energy your body needs to maintain the systemic equilibrium comes from environmental infrared light exposure
  • LEDs sabotage health and promote blindness. Limit your exposure to blue light during the daytime and at night. Swap out LEDs for incandescents or low-voltage incandescent halogen lights

Can light affect your health? In this interview, Dr. Alexander Wunsch, a world class expert on photobiology, shares the hidden dangers of light-emitting diode (LED) lighting that most people are completely unaware of.

In fact, this could potentially be one of the most important video interviews I’ve done, as it has enormous impacts — not only on preventing blindness as you age but it is also a pervasive hidden risk factor for sabotaging your health.

Largely as a result of energy efficiency, there’s been a major transition to using LED as a primary indoor light source. In this regard, it worked like a charm, reducing energy requirements by as much as 95 percent compared to incandescent thermal analog sources of lighting.

However, the heat generated by incandescent light bulbs, which is infrared radiation, is actually beneficial to your health, and hence worth the extra cost.

There are major downsides to LEDs that are not fully appreciated. LED lighting may actually be one of the most important, non-native EMF radiation exposures you’re exposed to on a daily basis.

If you chose to ignore these new insights, it can have very serious long-term ramifications. It could lead to age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which is the leading cause of blindness in the United States and elsewhere.

Other health problems rooted in mitochondrial dysfunction may also be exacerbated, and these run the gamut from metabolic disorder to cancer.



Photo credit: darf_nicht_mehr_hochladen at Pixabay.com


The medical experts who refuse to use low-energy light bulbs in their homes: Professors have stocked up on old-style bulbs to protect against skin cancer and blindness


How would you view a man who’s stockpiled a lifetime supply of old-fashioned lightbulbs because he believes low-energy bulbs could lead to blindness?

You might well dismiss him as dotty. But the man in question, John Marshall, is no crank. In fact, he’s one of Britain’s most eminent eye experts, the professor of ophthalmology at the University College London Institute of Ophthalmology. So concerned is he that he has boxes stacked with old-fashioned incandescent lightbulbs at home.

‘I bulk bought incandescent lightbulbs before the Government made it illegal to import them,’ he says.
‘I can’t give you an exact number, but I have enough to see me out.’

Nor is he alone in his concerns about modern lightbulbs. Another eminent British professor, John Hawk, an expert in skin disease, is warning they may cause sunburn-like damage, premature aging and even skin cancer.

He doesn’t have any low-energy bulbs in his house, explaining: ‘I have lots of old-style bulbs I bought in bulk when they were available.’

Incandescent bulbs had been the standard form of illumination for more than a century. But following an EU directive, the Government banned the import of 100-watt bulbs from 2009. This was followed by a ban on 60w bulbs in 2011 and a full ban on all ‘traditional’ bulbs in 2012.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2626564/The-medical-experts-refuse-use-low-energy-lightbulbs-homes-Professors-stocked-old-style-bulbs-protect-against-skin-cancer-blindness-So-YOU-worried.html#ixzz4atcyjCVl
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook