Tag Archives: anti bullying

The truth behind the Safe Schools program (Part 3)

See Part 1 here & Part 2 here

From the whaleoil blog:

This is disturbing. I’ve seen the agenda popping up in NZ now, the latest being the anti bullying day May 17th wherein every child had to wear something pink. So the real agenda is parading as anti-bullying in some parts of the planet. Here is a US blog also speaking to this issue. Australia’s ‘You’re Teaching Our Children What?’ site is pretty comprehensive on the topic. They also have a Facebook page if you are interested. And no we are not anti gay people, we are pro transparency! Gary Dowsett referred to in the article alludes to ‘inter-generational love’ (aka pedophilia). Note how they re frame everything?

Nobody wants bullying & I’m sure that stamping it out in our schools could be achieved without the requirement of children wearing pink. If pushing gender reassignment is the goal they should be up front and saying so, not cloaking it in other terms. Thereby parents would have a choice to opt their children out. I won’t pontificate further, please just read & decide for yourself. Or perhaps if you haven’t already, get yourself down to your child’s school and ask to see the full ‘safe schools’ curriculum. There is a link to the whole article below. EWR.

___________________________________________________________________________

Ministry of Sexualisation Part 3: Gender clinics in NZ schools?

Gender clinic

After introducing you to part two?yesterday the investigative series continues…

Safe Schools has landed in New Zealand, with the blessing of the Ministry of Education. The Ministry of Education wants ?inclusive school-wide systems?, and their website is now littered with links and videos directing teachers to Minus-18 and The Safe Schools Coalition.

Much like ?Safe Schools”, we are seeing the MoE push what are effectively ?Gender Clinics? into schools. These will include nurses and access to methods of transition directly from their school.

Couple this with the fact that they also want teachers to keep secrets from parents, and we?re headed for dangerous and uncharted waters.
It?s important to remember New Zealand has very relaxed parental notification laws as it is, and teenagers are notorious for making poorly thought out choices.

Evolve is listed in the above image as a ?Partner Agency? for helping kids transition.

I have been speaking with a Wellington woman who says her daughter, in one counselling session with Evolve, became convinced she was a boy.
Without parental consent, this 16 year old girl was given a boy’s haircut, boy’s clothing, and a new name. She was also provided a breast binder to make her appear more flat chested and given a referral to begin the pathway of puberty blockers.

READ MORE

https://www.whaleoil.net.nz/2019/02/ministry-of-sexualisation-part-3-gender-clinics-in-nz-schools/

 

 

The truth behind the Safe Schools program (Part 2)

From the Whale Oil Blog …. See here for Part 1.

(EWR comment after the article)


Ministry of Sexualisation: Part 2

Online videos show 11-year-old Desmond Napoles dancing on stage in a bar while grown men throw money at him neonnettle

After introducing you to part one yesterday, the investigative series continues.

Schools should be a safe place to be, but for the majority, they will soon become unsafe. Safe Schools has landed in New Zealand, with the blessing of the Ministry of Education.

[…] No other special interest group is granted such privileges.
We don?t devote entire lessons to the visually impaired, create ‘blind pride’ days, or include blind heroes in every class. We don?t demand teachers police blind-phobic language, or that they wear braille name-tags.

Perhaps we should. It would give a far more positive school environment than constantly bringing sex to the forefront of children’s minds.
This is the essence of what the Rainbow movement is about.

The entire culture and worldview is centred around who a person wants to have sex with.

Perhaps we should just let kids be kids.

I recently wrote a four-part series of articles exposing the hidden aspects of the Secondary School program Mates&Dates. The program uses innocuous sounding words such as ?gender stereotypes?.

‘Gender Stereotypes’ classes are not teaching kids that it’s okay for girls to like rugby and boys to like cooking. They are teaching a redefined meaning of gender.

READ MORE

https://www.whaleoil.net.nz/2019/02/ministry-of-sexualisation-part-2/

This is disturbing. I see the agenda popping up in NZ now, the latest being the anti bullying day May 17th wherein every child had to wear something pink. So the real agenda is parading as anti-bullying in some parts of the planet. Here is a US blog also speaking to this issue. Australia’s ‘You’re Teaching Our Children What?’ site is pretty comprehensive on the topic. They also have a Facebook page if you are interested. And no we are not anti gay people, we are pro transparency! Gary Dowsett referred to in the article alludes to ‘inter-generational love’ (aka pedophilia). Note how they re frame everything?

Nobody wants bullying & I’m sure that stamping it out in our schools could be achieved without the requirement of children wearing pink. If pushing gender reassignment is the goal they should be up front and saying so, not cloaking it in other terms. Thereby parents would have a choice to opt their children out. I won’t pontificate further, please just read & decide for yourself. Or perhaps if you haven’t already, get yourself down to your child’s school and ask to see the full ‘safe schools’ curriculum. EWR.

 

The truth behind the Safe Schools program (Part 1)

From the whaleoil blog:


“Safe Schools rocketed into the spotlight in Australia, mid-2017. It’s been exposed as being overseen by several people who openly support paedophilia as a legitimate sexual orientation. Gary Dowsett was one of them. He wrote a book about his support for ‘inter-generational love’ called; Boiled Lollies and Bandaids; Gay men and kids:  quote

‘How different then is the gentle, tentative sexuality between parent and child from the love of a paedophile and his or her lover. That kind of love, warmth and nurture is an important part of the paedophilic relationship’ end quote… Gary Dowsett

 

Ministry of Sexualisation: Part 1

Image from Vogue Paris 2011

Schools should be a safe place to be, but for the majority, they will soon become unsafe. Safe Schools has landed in New Zealand, with the blessing of the Ministry of Education.

Three things stand out from the above image:

1. The Ministry of Education wants ‘inclusive school-wide systems’.

2. The Ministry of Education officially sanctions the ‘Safe schools coalition’?

3. Views which are not in favour of homosexual & Trans people are ‘a form of violence’.

The Ministry of Education website is now littered with links and videos directing teachers to Minus-18 and The Safe schools coalition.

Safe Schools rocketed into the spotlight in Australia, mid-2017.
It’s been exposed as being overseen by several people who openly support paedophilia as a legitimate sexual orientation.

Gary Dowsett was one of them. He wrote a book about his support for ‘inter-generational love’ called; Boiled Lollies and Bandaids; Gay men and kids   quote

How different then is the gentle, tentative sexuality between parent and child from the love of a paedophile and his or her lover. That kind of love, warmth and nurture is an important part of the paedophilic relationship” end quote

Gary Dowsett

READ MORE:

https://www.whaleoil.net.nz/2019/02/ministry-of-sexualisation-part-1/

This is disturbing. I see the agenda popping up in NZ now, the latest being the anti bullying day May 17th wherein every child had to wear something pink. So the real agenda is parading as anti-bullying in some parts of the planet. Here is a US blog also speaking to this issue. Australia’s ‘You’re Teaching Our Children What?’ site is pretty comprehensive on the topic. They also have a Facebook page if you are interested. And no we are not anti gay people, we are pro transparency! Gary Dowsett referred to in the article alludes to ‘inter-generational love’ (aka pedophilia). Note how they re frame everything?

Nobody wants bullying & I’m sure that stamping it out in our schools could be achieved without the requirement of children wearing pink. If pushing gender reassignment is the goal they should be up front and saying so, not cloaking it in other terms. Thereby parents would have a choice to opt their children out. I won’t pontificate further, please just read & decide for yourself. Or perhaps if you haven’t already, get yourself down to your child’s school and ask to see the full ‘safe schools’ curriculum. EWR.