Tag Archives: allergic reactions

On April 20, NZ’s Ministry of Health removed all warnings about life-threatening allergic reactions to the cv jab from their website (2021)

Thanks to NZ Lawyer Sue Grey who has highlighted this important piece of info.

See the screenshots capturing the changes to NZ’s official Ministry of Health website between 12 and 20 April. All the warnings about life-threatening allergic reactions have disappeared.

The page on the left (below) is 12 April. The page on the right is the equivalent from 20 April.

Pages 1 & 2 enlarged below show the different versions

The sentence/point on Pfizer allergic reactions as appear (highlighted) on 12 April have been omitted on the updated page dated 20 April

The obvious question is of course: ‘why would your government that is committed to your health and safety, omit important info on possible allergic reactions? FYI if you look at the other links provided below, anaphylactic reactions are not as rare as we are being told. (See The Health Impact News website that is consistently recording the data). The pdf download at this link, page 7, states that ‘Serious allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis, have been reported.’ Noticeable particularly are the statements, over and over,

“no data”,

“no information available”

and “not listed”

***************************************************************

Add to the above info this, from Health Forum NZ’s FB page:

“Here is the link to the recently updated New Zealand Immunization Handbook published by Medsafe.Utterly astonishingly….In the CV 19 section….There is NO information about REPORTING ADVERSE EVENTS OR INJURY. No link to the CARM reporting system. No encouragement for doctors, hospitals or patients to report reactions. I find this quite incredible!!”
https://www.health.govt.nz/…/5-coronavirus-disease…

RELATED (for your own perusal of risks vs benefits):

Pfizer’s own website acknowledges the long term safety data and proof of efficacy does not yet exist

The Facts About Pfizer and BioNTech’s COVID-19 Vaccine (Pfizer’s website)

Read the pertinent questions that experienced medical practitioners have sent to the European Medicines Agency on the safety of the experimental Pfizer Covid 19 injection

A NZ lawyer asks: how did Cabinet get lawfully from Medsafe’s Provisional approval with 58 conditions on 3 Feb 2021, to fully adopting Pfizer’s experimental mRNA injection JUST A WEEK later?

Was NZ’s Medsafe (or the govt) hiding the truth re Pfizer vaccine?

Mainstream media cover two women paralyzed by Pfizer mRNA shots, emphasize it’s a “rare” adverse reaction

Pfizer’s Safety Data Sheet for you to peruse “without warranty of any kind, expressed or implied”

Other data on Pfizer noted in our archives

CDC Stops Reporting on Experimental COVID mRNA Injection Side Effects

Note: remember the CDC is a private organization, not government. EWR

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just released its weekly Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), and for the second week in a row, there is no new data on adverse reactions to the two FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) COVID mRNA injections.

The last report on the experimental injections and the adverse side effects was from January 6, 2021, and only covered the first week of injections with the experimental Pfizer COVID mRNA shots, with an emphasis on allergic reactions and anaphylaxis shock.

The report on January 6th did not cover the Moderna injections which have also received emergency use authorization by the FDA.

Injuries and deaths due to the experimental COVID injections are being reported in the U.S. and around the world, so why is the CDC not examining these adverse side effects and reporting on them?

READ MORE

LINK: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-stops-reporting-on-experimental-covid-mrna-injection-side-effects/

RELATED: https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2020/04/19/cdc-is-not-an-independent-govt-agency-it-is-a-privately-owned-subsidiary-of-big-pharma/