Tag Archives: ACC

Will your insurance company cover you for any covid vaccine adverse reactions? (An update on the Southern Cross post)

Our post recently about Southern Cross life insurance cover has been pointed to by Martin Harris at Uncensored as misinformation.

Firstly, thanks to Martin for keeping us on our toes, and secondly, it is never my intention to mislead & I believe the source gave it in good faith. Apologies for any inconvenience it may have caused anyone.

Anyway, I have withdrawn the post pending any further info materializing. If you have approached your own insurance company and can offer us information about their response please share.
_________________________________________________________________

Below here is the response by Southern Cross to Uncensored inquiries. QUOTE:

Stephen Child, chief medical officer for Southern Cross Health Insurance has provided us [Uncensored] with an official statement.

-starts-

Southern Cross follows the recommendations of the Ministry of Health and Medsafe on the management of COVID-19, and the utilisation of any vaccinations. 

We would like to reassure our Health Insurance and Life Insurance policyholders that their policies will continue in the usual way and in no way be impacted if they receive a MedSafe approved COVID-19 vaccine.

In New Zealand, acute care is provided by the public health system so if treatment is needed urgently after receiving a vaccine, you should go directly to the Accident and Emergency unit at your nearest public hospital.

ACC also provides treatment and support to people if they have an adverse reaction to any vaccine if their criteria for treatment injury is met. This is why vaccine-related treatment injury is a standard exclusion in our Health Insurance plans.

Therefore, as is current practice, if you develop symptoms from the COVID-19 vaccine or any other Medsafe approved vaccine and require treatment, you can lodge a claim with ACC.

If you have any questions about the COVID-19 vaccine, please visit the COVID-19 website.” END QUOTE
_______________________________________________________________

With all due respect, personally I still fail to see in this statement any firm reassurance that any serious adverse reaction beyond standard reactions will be compensated for? In fact the reader is directed to ACC requirements.

The link regarding criteria does not work at Uncensored, however the info can be found at the ACC link here:

Highlighting … “A physical injury resulting from a vaccination, including the COVID-19 vaccine, may be covered if the criteria for treatment injury are met. Under ACC legislation, the injury must be clearly caused by the vaccination and must not be a necessary part or ordinary consequence of the treatment”.

_______________________________________________________________________

I invite you now to read what the NZ vaccine expert Helen Petousis-Harris has to say about proof of causation:

“Experts reviewing the cases”… are they reviewing them? Taking this to its logical conclusion, it has already been demonstrated that the thousands of deaths being recorded, with few exceptions, the vaccinations continue.

So to summarize this point, VAERS is the CDC’s site (US) for reporting any adverse reaction following a vaccination. (Note stats for post vaccine injury in NZ will apparently not be available until July). However as is stated an adverse reaction does not indicate causality.

FYI : Consider the following feedback from others’ experience (no apology that these are Facebook comments… social media is today’s ‘town square’).

Although anecdotal with no … no proof, consider them useful background information. Unfortunately independent inquiry is unwelcome and any narrative alternative to mainstream’s ‘safe & effective’ is written off as anti-vax.

The point of concern historically is that it has become very evident in the testimonies of the parents of children who have experienced adverse events following vaccination, that MDs seldom acknowledge vaccines as causative.

I invite you to visit the VAXXED Youtube channel and browse the testimonies. Time and again their plea that their very normal and healthy child only changed directly after the jab, is refuted. Watch this very old footage on topic (see comments also).

In returning to ACC’s statement that the injury must be acknowledged as clearly caused by the vaccine, you need to be taking into account with your decision to take the CV jab, the difficulty or otherwise of obtaining any confirmation of injury from the medical profession. Already a NZ woman interviewed by Peter Williams at Magic Talk Radio has described the hostility she faced from an ambulance attendant at any suggestion that her injury was caused by the covid vaccine. In addition she had to “self-report[ed] her reaction to CARM as her medical centre refused to.”

This, people, is what we are up against. A steadfast refusal for decades to acknowledge any causative link between a jab and a reaction, in spite of the official registers recording the reactions. Do you really think that with this new experimental treatment, it is going to be any different?

I note today that the NZ Herald has reported the death (first article) and ongoing investigation by Police of an Auckland woman (second article). The Herald mentioned just once toward the end of their article that this woman had received the covid vaccine the day before. (Update: the sentence with reference to the vaccine was then removed with no explanation given.)

Still, the mantra continues. “Vaccines are safe and effective.”

I challenge you to be very specific with your insurance provider as to if and what they will cover regarding adverse reactions to the new experimental covid injection.

Australian women win landmark surgical mesh case – but Kiwi women can’t sue

From Stuff

Australian women suffering life-long complications from transvaginal surgical mesh have won a landmark case against pharmaceutical giant Johnson & Johnson and two of its affiliated companies.

Federal Court Justice Anna Katzmann found in favour of the group of 1200 women in the case against Johnson & Johnson on Thursday.

Complications included chronic inflammatory reaction, erosion of mesh into surrounding organs, infection, chronic pain, pain with sex, incontinence, damage to surrounding tissues, haemorrhage, leg weakness, further surgery and psychological injury.

The mesh products were used to treat stress urinary incontinence or uterus prolapse after childbirth in Australia and New Zealand.

READ MORE:
* US Food and Drug Administration halts pelvic organ mesh sales
* Auckland woman dead after two years of pain from surgical mesh
* Questions raised over whether Kiwi surgeons have enough experience and skill for transvaginal mesh implants

Katzmann said Johnson & Johnson and mesh manufactures Ethicon Sarl and Ethicon Inc engaged in misleading conduct, and each was negligent as the risks for the devices were “known, and not insignificant”.

READ MORE

https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/117609813/australian-women-win-landmark-surgical-mesh-case–but-kiwi-women-cant-sue?fbclid=IwAR1LJqDOpoAhMJltBOcECD4jcYFZKzWCk6r5SlGpMOlyD2FWEmBNohgnE40

ACC paid out $325,221 to NZers for vaccine injuries during the period mid 2017 to mid 2018

An OIA request reveals that during the period 1-July-2017 to 30-June-208 a sum of $325,221 was paid out in NZ for vaccine injuries. The intent of pointing this out is to draw your attention to the  claim that injuries from vaccines are extremely extremely rare. Whilst that my once have been the case, currently the stats in the US are recorded by CDC as 1 in 39. Not by any stretch of the imagination ‘rare’. Having this information is crucial when making the decision to vaccinate. Do ask for the inserts to the vaccine to learn the risks of side effects or risk of injury as frequently these are not pointed out. There is many a testimony online of people who became injured and wish they had asked. This all of course is called informed consent. Very important when using the precautionary approach to all things health. Bear in mind also that many injuries are not reported.

Below is a copy of the OIA request for your perusal:

vac injury oia

 

2 acc payouts for gardasil

Rocket Lab now supported by ACC … so what lies inside their secret US military contracts?

Apologies, I had to repost this as the layout turned to custard with no editing option & half the info disappearing …… so

We have posted previously on the Rocket Lab.  (For other articles on topic use the search box). Partnering / funded with / by defense contractor Lockheed Martin, the NZ Govt (which note, is a corporation) and now ACC (also a corporation)? This is something I’m watching. The article below is from thespinoff.co.nz

Ollie Neas | Guest writer
Investigation

Rocket Lab is a celebrated New Zealand success story, with a stated mission to open access to space and improve life on Earth. Yet many of its key contracts are with the US military and their suppliers. Ollie Neas reports on the dark side of a local business hero.

Last Friday Rocket Lab announced that it had secured US$140m (NZ$206m) in new funding from a range of investors, including the publicly-owned ACC.

After a launch the Sunday before, this announcement marked the second time in a week that hundreds of international media outlets took notice of Rocket Lab and, by extension, New Zealand.

At home, though, the issue has been whether New Zealand deserves more of the credit for the billion-dollar company’s success, with Chris Keall in the New Zealand Herald querying descriptions of Rocket Lab as an “American start-up”.

However, there is another side to Rocket Lab, one that raises questions about New Zealand’s – and ACC’s – support for the company.

READ MORE

https://thespinoff.co.nz/business/20-11-2018/what-lies-inside-rocket-labs-secret-us-military-contracts/?fbclid=IwAR2OUz4hGRcVoXiuAlsNOilnCx0Mx89-QHZ-hVIT5n66uxLKRytRCx1qrZk#.W_xjQ1fFQpo.facebook

The big taxpayer-funded pay rises: $50,000-plus boost for top public CEOs

Pardon my graphic description but here we have pigs at the trough again. A reminder of the corruption our country now labours under. I was raised in the era when renumeration was more in line with reality. The real workers are squeezed onto minimum minimum wage with loud squeals if they ask for more, taxed one third on second jobs, while these shrewd suited apologies for humanity wallow in obscene wealth. Who needs a million dollars pa to survive? And we have the usual lame lipservice justification … “How much we pay chief executives requires a careful balance between ensuring we can attract and retain highly qualified and skilled leaders while being prudent … when spending public money.”

Bollocks. Spending public money? Why the CE in Horowhenua Council recently gifted public assets to private developers Willis & Bond to the tune of $1.86 million. Prudence? Public money? Pleeeze.
EnvirowatchRangitikei

1509978_745670518844847_403082449805717955_n.jpg
A reminder of how neo lib economics favours the top echelon … we are fed the illusory lie that all can succeed under this system


The big taxpayer-funded pay rises: $50,000-plus boost for top public CEOs

The chief executives of Housing NZ, the Ministry of Education, Tourism NZ and the Accident Compensation Corporation were among those who reaped at least $50,000 more in pay and bonuses over the last year.

Figures released by the State Services Commission show ACC chief executive Scott Pickering was paid $760,000-$770,000, which is $150,000 more than the year before. Housing NZ Corporation CEO Glen Sowry received between $520,000 and $530,000 – at least $50,000 more than the year before. And Education chief executive Peter Hughes got at least $60,000 more than the year before with between $620,000 and $630,000.

READ MORE:

https://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11551945

A recent interview with the poisoned Waikato family reveals more details about the ongoing DHB cover up

This latest interview is from the GrafBoys (TV Wild) revealing more from the family who were poisoned from eating wild pork, likely by all appearances from a 1080 treated area. Basically a trail of flip flops from day one, it all reeks of cover up in what looks like a scramble to exclude 1080 as a possible cause. I mean, not testing the meal for 1080 at all? Not testing the family’s urine until after the required timeline for testing has expired? This is not rocket science and it is not the first time the NZ health authorities have bungled in the field of testing for correct diagnosis. Back in 2006 a NZ medical doctor suspected 1080 poisoning as the cause of death in a young woman, and subsequently the NZ lab charged with testing her heart to confirm or rule out this possibility lost her heart.

See links to the the TV Wild channel at the video on Youtube (click on YT icon, bottom right of video). For the history of this story go to this page or for all 1080 posts find 1080 under categories at left of the page. For more info on 1080 see our 1080 pages at the main menu. (See updates below from Kathy White).
EnvirowatchRangitikei

Further comments from Waikato Regional Councillor Kathy White:

I’ve spent the last few weeks reading the medical notes of the Kochumman family that was poisoned through eating wild boar. Here are the things that have resonated with me: (1) the first working diagnosis by the registrar on the day the family was admitted to hospital was “consumption of meat containing poison used for possum/rodent killing ? neurotoxin ? 1080 ? strychnine poisoning which can produce a picture of lactic acidosis, nausea, vomiting, altered mental state and convulsions. Saying this, the differential remains wide, although we do not think this is infection … I cannot come up with an alternative pathology for raised lactate. May need to see if the police can test the meat for neurotoxins.”

If this was the working diagnosis from Day One, why did the authorities not test any of the food for 1080 poison or its metabolites? Why did they not test the patients for 1080 poisoning until 18 days later? The medical notes show doctors were waiting for a 1080 test result. And yet someone made the decision not to do these tests, or to at least delay them. Unfortunately, testing urine for 1080 18 days after hospitalisation does not fit with testing protocol and renders the test unreliable.

Kathy White is the Waikato Regional Councillor for Taupo-Rotorua. This is her personal view.

Follow this link for a further press release from Kathy White:

https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2018/01/22/press-release-following-further-examination-of-the-poisoned-waikato-familys-medical-notes-kathy-white/

 

Poisoned Waikato family – not botulism so ACC now clear to assist poisoned family

So, at 2:20 min on this video the family’s lawyer states “as far as we know the original meat samples were only tested for botulism, they weren’t tested for 1080 so we don’t believe at this stage that 1080 can be excluded”!

Published on Jan 3, 2018

The Putaruru family incorrectly diagnosed with botulism poisoning is now clear for ACC cover after an urgent meeting with the family spokesperson, family lawyer, and the Waikato DHB chief. Click on the video for the full story …

The Possible Health Risks of 1080 Exposure: Two NZ Women blame a 1080 drop for their lingering illness

table-165692_1280“A year after 1080 poison rained from the sky as Reefton sisters were enjoying a picnic near Kokiri, both are still experiencing ill health and have lodged a claim with ACC.”
NZ Herald

 

coromandel.png
Following 1080 drops people have observed pellets on public walkways and seating

Liver, throat & thyroid problems, weight loss, a thinner optical nerve and ongoing nausea are just some of the health effects these women are experiencing.

Still the authorities minimize the risks with this poison. Some NZ Midwives back in 2008 were warning women to leave town prior to a 1080 drop saying, “Nobody can guarantee this substance does not cross the placental barrier.”  It is known from research that 1080 has caused deformities in animal fetuses. Not something any mother would want to risk surely, and yet we are seldom told these things. Instead we are told there is no proven link between 1080 and the said health problems. We have the same scenario with glyphosate, a commonly used herbicide ingredient that independent research indicates it is carcinogenic. As a consequence, instead of erring on the side of caution as any ounce of common sense would indicate as the prudent course of action, the powers that be insist it is all ka pai. No worries. Carry on as usual. This is the way of corporations and maximizing profits… EnvirowatchRangitikei

READ the article HERE:  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11472942

LINKS:
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/health/509006/Midwives-warn-of-1080-risk

http://1080science.co.nz/birth-defects/


Educate yourself on 1080 poisoning. See also http://1080science.co.nz/ and our 1080 pages for info & links, &/or search ‘categories’ drop down box for further related articles (at left of any page). 

Consider liking our FB page &/or following our blog (right of any page) to help spread the word on all the untruths we have been told – we are about exposing corruption and lies!  Use the share buttons! 

Thank you!

EnvirowatchRangitikei