Category Archives: Science

57 Top Scientists and Doctors Release Shocking Study on COVID Vaccines

A group of 57 leading scientists, doctors and policy experts has released a report calling in to question the safety and efficacy of the current COVID-19 vaccines and are now calling for an immediate end to all vaccine programs. We urge you to read and share this damning report.

By Dr. Roxana Bruno, Dr. Peter McCullough, and et al.

There are two certainties regarding the global distribution of Covid-19 vaccines. The first is that governments and the vast majority of the mainstream media are pushing with all their might to get these experimental drugs into as many people as possible. The second is that those who are willing to face the scorn that comes with asking serious questions about vaccines are critical players in our ongoing effort to spread the truth.

You can read an advanced copy of this manuscript in preprint below. It has been prepared by nearly five dozen highly respected doctors, scientists, and public policy experts from across the globe to be urgently sent to world leaders as well as all who are associated with the production and distribution of the various Covid-19 vaccines in circulation today.

READ MORE

https://virutron.com/57-top-scientists-and-doctors-release-shocking-study-on-covid-vaccines/?fbclid=IwAR2XaYEYiUbjuKJI6uAtYwePpGCVogfcTplM6UZ7xhA-IPQEQ3aI3FsCsYs

Photo credit: pixabay.com

A FOI request to the Australian drugs regulator that approved the Pfizer vaccine confirms that they have never seen the study data

From doctors4covidethics.org

A Freedom of Information request to the Australian drugs regulator that approved the Pfizer vaccine confirms that they have never seen the study data

A freedom of information request (FOI) request was made by one of our members in February 2021 to the Australian drugs regulator, the TGA (Therapeutic Good Administration) to ask what should have been simple questions. The TGA is the Australian equivalent of the FDA (US), MHRA (UK) and EMA (Europe) and is held in high regard worldwide. Essentially the FOI questions were:

  1. Did the TGA request the raw data from Pfizer
  2. Did any of the committees approving the vaccine look at the raw data and/or discuss it
  3. What were the “studies” referred to in the approval document relating to teratogenicity (risk of harm to a fetus)

The rationale of the request relates to concern over the validity and verifiability of Pfizer’s data given its legal history (and expressed by Peter Doshi in the BMJ in February) as well as the proven concerns over fraudulent data relating to Covid-19 as seen in the “Lancetgate” scandal of June 2020.

The document below is a redacted version of the documents that were sent by the TGA in response to this request. What they show is that the TGA never saw or requested the patient data from Pfizer and simply accepted their reporting of their study as true. This means that when the head of the TGA John Skerritt said that “the safety evidence is pretty thorough” on the 6th February (here) his words would ring hollow to most Australians who have assumed, rightly or wrongly, that the TGA had actually looked at the patient data themselves.

A further concerning aspect of the FOI request is the efforts to which the TGA appeared to go to suppress the request – initially requesting a 6 months extension in view of a “voluminous request” which eventually yielded only one document of 14 pages, heavily redacted. This required an instruction from the Office of the Information Commissioner to the TGA to answer the request by the 26th May, a deadline that the TGA also failed to meet.

Eventually the only document that was produced from the FOI request was a heavily redacted single study (not studies, as claimed in the TGA assessment document) showing that the only investigation into the effects on the fetus was performed on 44 rats with no long term data on the offspring. It is impossible to assess this study fully because 98% of the document was removed in order to protect Pfizer’s intellectual property (points 32-44 of the report).

The full FOI report should appear on the TGA website in due course at the following link …

READ MORE, (LINKS AT SOURCE)

https://doctors4covidethics.org/pfizer-vaccine-rubber-stamped-data-sight-unseen/

If your employer says this is “just like a flu vaccination”

From The Health Forum NZ Facebook page

Read this well and ponder these words of warning from a German Doctor and Biochemist, Dr. Jochen Ziegler.

Do not let anyone tell you (as employers currently are, here in NZ) that this is “just like a flu vaccination”. He is referring to a case of thrombocytopenia (destruction of blood platelets causing fatal bleeding) after the Covid mRNA vaccine, in a 56 year old doctor.

Quote…”If this is confirmed, it follows that the side effect of vaccination with BNT162b may be acute thrombocytopenia. Since more than a million people have been vaccinated worldwide, that would be a very rare side effect.

If the vaccine were effective in preventing the severe COVID illness and preventing death, such a rare side effect could still be accepted. But such an effect has not been shown (and it is also unlikely ), nor has it been shown to have any effect on the distribution of evolutionary offspring of SARS-CoV-2, which genetically no longer exists, through infection.

So far, NO STUDY HAS BEEN ABLE TO SHOW THAT VACCINATION REDUCES INFECTION RATES. That would only be possible with high vaccination coverage. It cannot be ruled out either, but it is also possible that the virus has long since mutated to such an extent that if a large number of people are vaccinated, it cannot develop this effect.

Much more important is that we DO NOT KNOW THE CHRONIC EFFECTS OF BNT162b ON THE IMMUNE SYSTEM and DO NOT KNOW WHETHER IT CAN LEAD TO AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE such as Guillain-Barré syndrome or lupus erythematosus. THIS IS BECAUSE THE VACCINE HAS NOT BEEN TESTED FOR CHRONIC TOXICITY BEFORE APPROVAL.

These effects can be observed in spring or early summer 2021 at the earliest, when the vaccinees in the first studies have already been vaccinated for nine months to a year. Then you have to wait another year to really know the chronic effects.

That is how long one should have waited with the approval of the vaccine, BECAUSE CURRENTLY ONE VACCINATES WITHOUT KNOWING WHETHER THE SUBSTANCE PROTECTS OLD PEOPLE FROM DEATH BY COVID AND WITHOUT KNOWING THE DANGERS OF THE VACCINE. USUALLY YOU ONLY VACCINATE AFTER CAREFULLY WEIGHING THE BENEFITS AND RISKS. THIS DID NOT HAPPEN WITH THE PFIZER VACCINE.

The G. Michael case tragically suggests what that might mean. He was not at risk from COVID due to his age and health, and we do not know whether the vaccination would have protected others from infection by him. Now he is vaccinated and dead. Further developments will have to be observed very carefully.https://www.achgut.com/…/impfungen_wie_risiken_sichtbar…

Photo: pixabay.com

No safety data? No problem!

C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand

Are the new Covid 19 vaccines SAFE?
That’s the primary question for so many “vaccine hesitant” or downright “NO” potential recipients. As Operation Warp Speed raced Covid vaccines to market in record time, millions of people are receiving vaccines that are still collecting data on safety and efficacy for the next two years! Quietly, while you may have been wrapped up in your own safety research, several countries have changed their legislation regarding the release of NEW Covid 19 vaccines, designed to counter the burgeoning “variant” (e.g. mutated) strains.Canada, UK, America, Australia, Singapore and Switzerland will now all allow a fast track process for these new vaccines to be used on the general public

WITHOUT FIRST SHOWING EVIDENCE OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS.

Yes you heard me right. It seems that taking the (deemed unnecessary) time to determine that the vaccines will not injure or kill recipients….or that they do indeed work…will take too long and allow covid variants too much time to break away. Instead, the safety record of the currently used Covid vaccines can be used to judge the safety of the new ones, the countries’ regulatory agencies declare. Remember the current vaccines are deemed “Safe and effective”…despite the thousands of vaccine injury horror stories you can access on social media every day.

Based on the existing rubber stamp “safe and effective”, modifications of these vaccines will not require full clinical trials. Rather than full clinical trials, only a small amount of data needs to be put together by the manufacturers prior to seeking an EUA. Then after the EUA is granted further data can then be gathered from people in the general population who are given the vaccines.

https://www.rosemaryfrei.ca/no-safety-data/…

Image by Jan Vašek from Pixabay

Canadian public health officials have no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification performed anywhere, ever (FOI request)

By Christine Massey, M.Sc., exclusively for People For Justice Canada


Further down this page you will see a screenshot of a Freedom of Information (FOI) request that was submitted to the Public Health Agency of Canada and many other Canadian institutions requesting evidence that is absolutely essential (but not on its own sufficient) for establishing the existence of the alleged “COVID-19 virus” aka “SARS-COV-2”.

The request is for records describing the isolation (aka purification) of the alleged “COVID-19” virus, from a patient sample that was not first adulterated with additional genetic material (typically monkey kidney cells and fetal bovine serum). The same request has been submitted to 16 Canadian institutions in total.

Without this isolation step having been performed (followed by controlled experiments and other necessary steps), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged “novel coronavirus” blamed for widespread death/disease/lockdown measures actually exists.

READ MORE

https://peopleforjusticecanada.com/2021/01/05/canadian-public-health-officials-have-no-record-of-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-performed-anywhere-ever/

Image by mwooten from Pixabay

Wiki Wonka and the Covid-19 Factory (Dr Sam Bailey)

Dr. Sam Bailey 223K subscribers

An analysis of Wikipedia and Covid-19. #covid19wikipedia​ References: 1. Simple Wikipedia – Coronavirus disease 2019: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cor…​ 2. WHO – https://www.who.int/emergencies/disea…​ 3. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1…​ 4. Virus Mania (see online suppliers below) 5. WHO – Coronavirus disease Q&A: https://www.who.int/emergencies/disea…​ 6. Wikipedia – Coronavirus disease 2019: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coronav…​ 7. Wall Street Journal, Feb 26, 2021 (Pay-walled): https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-hunt-…​ 8. New York Times https://web.archive.org/web/202102282…​ 9. SARS-CoV-2 Isolate Truth Fund: https://www.samueleckert.net/isolat-t…​ 10. Wikipedia – Symptoms of Covid-19: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symptom…​ 11. Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID‐19: https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/…​ 12. ECDPC – Clinical characteristics of COVID-19: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/covid-1…​ 13. FAZ article, 16 March 2020 – “We discovered new symptoms” (German): https://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellsch…​ 14. The neurological manifestations of COVID-19: a review article: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/arti…​ 15. Eckhart Tolle: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KuJxE…​ Want to see more videos about health? Let me know in the comments below. Please support my channel ▶https://www.subscribestar.com/DrSamBa…​ Leave me a tip! ▶https://www.buymeacoffee.com/drsambailey​ Follow me on Odysee (go on you know you want to!) ▶https://odysee.com/@drsambailey:c​ Virus Mania book: abe.com (different suppliers) – https://www.abebooks.com/servlet/Sear…​ Amazon – https://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mania-CO…​ Amazon Kindle – https://www.amazon.com/Virus-Mania-CO…​ Audiobook…is coming! Subscribe for new YouTube videos ▶https://www.youtube.com/c/DrSamBailey​ Follow me on BrandNew Tube (yes, it has even more stuff!) ▶https://brandnewtube.com/@Drsambailey​ Send business/sponsorship inquiries to admin@drsambailey.com

Urgent Open Letter from Doctors and Scientists to the European Medicines Agency regarding COVID-19 Vaccine Safety Concerns

From C-o-v-1-9 V@cc Reacts and News New Zealand

Doctors for Covid Ethics

Emer Cooke, Executive Director, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

28 February 2021

Dear Sirs/Mesdames,

FOR THE URGENT PERSONAL ATTENTION OF: EMER COOKE, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE EUROPEAN MEDICINES AGENCY

As physicians and scientists, we are supportive in principle of the use of new medical interventions which are appropriately developed and deployed, having obtained informed consent from the patient. This stance encompasses vaccines in the same way as therapeutics.

We note that a wide range of side effects is being reported following vaccination of previously healthy younger individuals with the gene-based COVID-19 vaccines. Moreover, there have been numerous media reports from around the world of care homes being struck by COVID-19 within days of vaccination of residents. While we recognise that these occurrences might, every one of them, have been unfortunate coincidences, we are concerned that there has been and there continues to be inadequate scrutiny of the possible causes of illness or death under these circumstances, and especially so in the absence of post-mortems examinations.

In particular, we question whether cardinal issues regarding the safety of the vaccines were adequately addressed prior to their approval by the European Medicines Agency (EMA).

As a matter of great urgency, we herewith request that the EMA provide us with responses to the following issues:

1. Following intramuscular injection, it must be expected that the gene-based vaccines will reach the bloodstream and disseminate throughout the body [1]. We request evidence that this possibility was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

2. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that the vaccines will remain entrapped in the circulation and be taken up by endothelial cells. There is reason to assume that this will happen particularly at sites of slow blood flow, i.e. in small vessels and capillaries [2]. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

3. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that during expression of the vaccines’ nucleic acids, peptides derived from the spike protein will be presented via the MHC I — pathway at the luminal surface of the cells. Many healthy individuals have CD8-lymphocytes that recognize such peptides, which may be due to prior COVID infection, but also to cross-reactions with other types of Coronavirus [3; 4] [5]. We must assume that these lymphocytes will mount an attack on the respective cells. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

4. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that endothelial damage with subsequent triggering of blood coagulation via platelet activation will ensue at countless sites throughout the body. We request evidence that this probability was excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

5. If such evidence is not available, it must be expected that this will lead to a drop in platelet counts, appearance of D-dimers in the blood, and to myriad ischaemic lesions throughout the body including in the brain, spinal cord and heart. Bleeding disorders might occur in the wake of this novel type of DIC-syndrome including, amongst other possibilities, profuse bleedings and haemorrhagic stroke. We request evidence that all these possibilities were excluded in pre-clinical animal models with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

6. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the ACE2 receptor on platelets, which results in their activation [6]. Thrombocytopenia has been reported in severe cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection [7]. Thrombocytopenia has also been reported in vaccinated individuals [8]. We request evidence that the potential danger of platelet activation that would also lead to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) was excluded with all three vaccines prior to their approval for use in humans by the EMA.

7. The sweeping across the globe of SARS-CoV-2 created a pandemic of illness associated with many deaths. However, by the time of consideration for approval of the vaccines, the health systems of most countries were no longer under imminent threat of being overwhelmed because a growing proportion of the world had already been infected and the worst of the pandemic had already abated. Consequently, we demand conclusive evidence that an actual emergency existed at the time of the EMA granting Conditional Marketing Authorisation to the manufacturers of all three vaccines, to justify their approval for use in humans by the EMA, purportedly because of such an emergency.

Should all such evidence not be available, we demand that approval for use of the gene-based vaccines be withdrawn until all the above issues have been properly addressed by the exercise of due diligence by the EMA.

There are serious concerns, including but not confined to those outlined above, that the approval of the COVID-19 vaccines by the EMA was premature and reckless, and that the administration of the vaccines constituted and still does constitute “human experimentation”, which was and still is in violation of the Nuremberg Code.

In view of the urgency of the situation, we request that you reply to this email within seven days and address all our concerns substantively. Should you choose not to comply with this reasonable request, we will make this letter public.

This email is copied to:

Charles Michel, President of the Council of Europe

Ursula von der Leyen, President of the European Commission.

Doctors and scientists can sign the open letter by emailing their name, qualifications, areas of expertise, country and any affiliations they would like to cite, to Doctors4CovidEthics@protonmail.com

References

[1] Hassett, K. J.; Benenato, K. E.; Jacquinet, E.; Lee, A.; Woods, A.; Yuzhakov, O.; Himansu, S.; Deterling, J.; Geilich, B. M.; Ketova, T.; Mihai, C.; Lynn, A.; McFadyen, I.; Moore, M. J.; Senn, J. J.; Stanton, M. G.; Almarsson, Ö.; Ciaramella, G. and Brito, L. A.(2019).Optimization of Lipid Nanoparticles for Intramuscular Administration of mRNA Vaccines, Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids 15 : 1–11.

[2] Chen, Y. Y.; Syed, A. M.; MacMillan, P.; Rocheleau, J. V. and Chan, W. C. W.(2020). Flow Rate Affects Nanoparticle Uptake into Endothelial Cells, Advanced materials 32 : 1906274.

[3] Grifoni, A.; Weiskopf, D.; Ramirez, S. I.; Mateus, J.; Dan, J. M.; Moderbacher, C. R.; Rawlings, S. A.; Sutherland, A.; Premkumar, L.; Jadi, R. S. and et al.(2020). Targets of T Cell Responses to SARS-CoV-2 Coronavirus in Humans with COVID-19 Disease and Unexposed Individuals, Cell 181 : 1489–1501.e15.

[4] Nelde, A.; Bilich, T.; Heitmann, J. S.; Maringer, Y.; Salih, H. R.; Roerden, M.; Lübke, M.; Bauer, J.; Rieth, J.; Wacker, M.; Peter, A.; Hörber, S.; Traenkle, B.; Kaiser, P. D.; Rothbauer, U.; Becker, M.; Junker, D.; Krause, G.; Strengert, M.; Schneiderhan-Marra, N.; Templin, M. F.; Joos, T. O.; Kowalewski, D. J.; Stos-Zweifel, V.; Fehr, M.; Rabsteyn, A.; Mirakaj, V.; Karbach, J.; Jäger, E.; Graf, M.; Gruber, L.-C.; Rachfalski, D.; Preuß, B.; Hagelstein, I.; Märklin, M.; Bakchoul, T.; Gouttefangeas, C.; Kohlbacher, O.; Klein, R.; Stevanović, S.; Rammensee, H.-G. and Walz, J. S.(2020). SARS-CoV-2-derived peptides define heterologous and COVID-19-induced T cell recognition, Nature immunology.

[5] Sekine, T.; Perez-Potti, A.; Rivera-Ballesteros, O.; Strålin, K.; Gorin, J.-B.; Olsson, A.; Llewellyn-Lacey, S.; Kamal, H.; Bogdanovic, G.; Muschiol, S. and et al.(2020). Robust T Cell Immunity in Convalescent Individuals with Asymptomatic or Mild COVID-19, Cell 183 : 158–168.e14.

[6] Zhang, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, X.; Yang, L.; Li, H.; Wang, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhao, X.; Xie, Y.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Fan, Z.; Dong, J.; Yuan, Z.; Ding, Z.; Zhang, Y. and Hu, L.(2020). SARS-CoV-2 binds platelet ACE2 to enhance thrombosis in COVID-19, Journal of hematology & oncology 13 : 120.

[7] Lippi, G.; Plebani, M. and Henry, B. M.(2020).Thrombocytopenia is associated with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infections: A meta-analysis, Clin. Chim. Acta 506 : 145–148.

[8] Grady, D. (2021). A Few Covid Vaccine Recipients Developed a Rare Blood Disorder, The New York Times, Feb. 8, 2021.

Yours faithfully,

Professsor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, Professor Emeritus of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Former Chair, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and Thailand)

Dr Marco Chiesa MD FRCPsych, Consultant Psychiatrist and Visiting Professor, University College London (Medical Doctor) (United Kingdom and Italy)

Dr C Stephen Frost BSc MBChB Specialist in Diagnostic Radiology, Stockholm, Sweden (Medical Doctor) (United Kingdom and Sweden)

Dr Margareta Griesz-Brisson MD PhD, Consultant Neurologist and Neurophysiologist (studied Medicine in Freiburg, Germany, speciality training for Neurology at New York University, Fellowship in Neurophysiology at Mount Sinai Medical Centre, New York City; PhD in Pharmacology with special interest in chronic low level neurotoxicology and effects of environmental factors on brain health), Medical Director, The London Neurology and Pain Clinic (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Germany and United Kingdom)

Professor Martin Haditsch MD PhD, Specialist (Austria) in Hygiene and Microbiology, Specialist (Germany) in Microbiology, Virology, Epidemiology/Infectious Diseases, Specialist (Austria) in Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Medical Director, TravelMedCenter, Leonding, Austria, Medical Director, Labor Hannover MVZ GmbH (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Austria and Germany)

Professor Stefan Hockertz, Professor of Toxicology and Pharmacologym, European registered Toxicologist, Specialist in Immunology and Immunotoxicology, CEO tpi consult GmbH. (Scientist) (Germany)

Dr Lissa Johnson, BSc BA(Media) MPsych(Clin) PhD, Clinical Psychologist and Behavioural Psychologist, Expertise in the social psychology of torture, atrocity, collective violence and fear propaganda, Former member Australian Psychological Society Public Interest Advisory Group (Clinical Psychologist and Behavioural Scientist) (Australia)

Professor Ulrike Kämmerer PhD, Associate Professor of Experimental Reproductive Immunology and Tumor Biology at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Germany, Trained molecular virologist (Diploma, PhD-Thesis) and Immunologist (Habilitation), Remains engaged in active laboratory research (Molecular Biology, Cell Biology (Scientist) (Germany)

Associate Professor Michael Palmer MD, Department of Chemistry (studied Medicine and Medical Microbiology in Germany, has taught Biochemistry since 2001 in present university in Canada; focus on Pharmacology, metabolism, biological membranes, computer programming; experimental research focus on bacterial toxins and antibiotics (Daptomycin); has written a textbook on Biochemical Pharmacology, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada (Medical Doctor and Scientist) (Canada and Germany)

Professor Karina Reiss PhD, Professor of Biochemistry, Christian Albrecht University of Kiel, Expertise in Cell Biology, Biochemistry (Scientist) (Germany)

Professor Andreas Sönnichsen MD, Professor of General Practice and Family Medicine, Department of General Practice and Family Medicine, Center of Public Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (Medical Doctor) (Austria)

Dr Michael Yeadon BSc (Joint Honours in Biochemistry and Toxicology) PhD (Pharmacology), Formerly Vice President & Chief Scientific Officer Allergy & Respiratory, Pfizer Global R&D; Co-founder & CEO, Ziarco Pharma Ltd.; Independent Consultant (Scientist) (United Kingdom) Doctors for Covid Ethics

SOURCE: https://www.facebook.com/groups/328482204918876/?multi_permalinks=364947391272357%2C364561654644264%2C364499551317141%2C364489881318108&notif_id=1615521301936970&notif_t=group_activity&ref=notif

Image by Ewa Urban from Pixabay

Examining the Risks and Benefits of SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines (Dr R.M. Fleming)

Watch the video at the link below. It is unavailable to play except at YT.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-JKu4eYxok

Richard M Fleming, PhD, MD, JD 1.05K subscribers

In this video we will look at the research that has been published on SARS-CoV-2, the spike protein, and Vaccine Enhanced Disease. We will look at three specific areas including (1) Antibody-dependent Enhancement resulting from antibodies made to the N-terminal domain of the spike protein, (2) Prion-like domains on the spike protein, and (3) the ability of the virus and the mRNA of the spike protein to insert itself into human DNA using Reverse Transcriptase (RT). You can find more information on http://www.FlemingMethod.com and at https://www.amazon.com/Dr-Richard-M-F…

_______________________________________________________________________

INFO FROM AMAZON.COM

Dr. Richard M. Fleming
Dr Richard M. Fleming (Photo: amazon.com)

About Dr. Richard M. Fleming

I was born and raised in Northeast Iowa and as a “Kennedy Kid” received advanced Doctorate scientific training through a program established by the JFK administration including Calculus and Particle Physics – a process that began when I was 12 years old. I have received degrees in Physics, Biology, Chemistry and Psychology graduating second – first runner up – in my class.

I attended the University of Iowa College of Medicine graduating with High Honors including research on sodium (salt) and hypertension in patients, as 1 of 17 Honors students in Internal Medicine out of a class of 176. I have been blessed to be trained by some of the best physician-scientists in the world.

Following medical college, I completed my Internship and Residency in Internal Medicine, and Cardiology Fellowship where I began publishing several research papers on QCA, diets and heart disease and trained in Nuclear Cardiology including both SPECT & PET imaging. I am one of three “certified” from the University in PET imaging following a one-year course of study on anti-matter PET cameras and instrumentation.

Following my post doc training I continued my investigation into the cause of heart disease and developed the Theory of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease in 1994, the theory that not only explains Heart Disease, but also explains Cancer and SARS-CoV-2; aka CoVid-19.

Most recently I obtained my law degree receiving the class award for Memorandum of Law. I have used this degree to assist in several Federal case filings including Civil Rights litigation and patent development. Prior to receiving my JD I attempted to address some of the problems with Big Pharma – an area of my life where I have met with my greatest failures, but which I continue to fight in an effort to expose what I consider to be moral wrongs. More on that in upcoming books!

Following 20 years of research I finally patented the Fleming Method for Tissue and Vascular Differentiation and Metabolism, which is the only non-invasive method available to quantitatively measure changes happening inside the body; changes that occur with heart disease, cancer, and CoVid-19.

As of 2020 I have been blessed to have been given the opportunity to conduct research for 52-years. Something I will continue to do and share with the scientific community and public.

Most importantly I am the son of Joseph & Margaret, and the father of three children – who are my greatest achievement!

New study suggests more than a quarter of scientific papers “spin” results

(Natural News) Headlines about health studies often leave people confused and frustrated, with a study claiming that a certain food is bad for you often contradicted by one that says the opposite just days or months later. When you throw the financial interests of various studies’ sponsors into the mix, it’s no surprise that many people take scientific studies with a huge grain of salt. However, even die-hard study skeptics are likely to believe new research that shows scientific papers regularly spin their results.

After reviewing 35 published academic studies of the phenomenon of “spin” or “science hype” in biomedical scientific papers, researchers from the University of Sydney’s Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy discovered that more than 26 percent of studies known as meta-analyses or systematic reviews contained spin. When they focused solely on non-randomized trials, the proportion skyrocketed to an alarming 84 percent.

The spin came in many forms throughout the studies in question. Some made inappropriate claims about results that were not statistically significant, while others attributed causality when it was not possible. Studies also used selective reporting, like choosing only to mention certain data in the conclusions, and some made inappropriate recommendations that were not backed up by the study’s results. There were also many instances of studies painting data in a deceivingly positive light, such as by writing abstracts that were overly optimistic, underreporting any adverse events, and describing the study’s design in a way that was misleading.

A lot of this spin was connected to outside influence on the scientists in question, and more research is needed to uncover the extent of this behavior. Study co-author Professor Lisa Bero said: “The contribution of research incentives and reward structures — for example financial and reputational — that rely on ‘positive’ conclusions in order to publish and garner media attention is yet to be addressed.”

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2017-10-25-sensationalized-science-new-study-suggests-more-than-a-quarter-of-scientific-papers-spin-results.html