This is not a new idea. Ardern has been saying for a good while now, since the plandemic in particular, that she and her government are oursingle source of truth.
She is serious about that. At one point she even told Kiwis not to speak to their neighbours. This all of course flies in the face of community and caring and looks not unlike fascism … parading under the guise of protecting our physical health. No problem however with the rise in numbers of child suicides. That has been sorted however by changing the definition of suicide to‘accidental death’. And no move towards investigating the rise in NZ’s all cause mortality rate or any possible correlation it may have with the jab rollout. Apart from a recent admission by NZ’s vaccine expert Helen Petousis Harris, that they perhaps didn’t warn us well enough of a possible Myocarditis risk. This also followed a coroner’s ruling that a New Zealander’s death one year ago was caused by the jab. That has been followed by a Bill in Parliament as I write, to tweak the requirements around coroners’ investigations as to ’cause of death’. They are overwhelmed it seems by the sheer numbers of deaths so appear to be attempting to fast track the process.
So Ardern, who is one of Schwab’s global leaders remember, speaks of a need to double down globally on censorship. The perceived need is to censor ‘disinformation’. Could that disinfo include uncomfortable truths like the plight of those who fell ill or died post jab? There were many of those there at the Parliament protest earlier in 2022, totally ignored … ‘kind’ Ardern declined to speak with any of them. Not one, and there were even Medical Doctors there speaking out. She did eventually show her face however, once the protest was disbanded.
New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern is the latest liberal leader to call for an international alliance to censor speech. Unsatisfied with the unprecedented corporate censorship of social media companies, leaders like Hillary Clinton have turned from private censorship to good old-fashioned state censorship. Speech regulation has become an article of faith on the left. Ardern used her speech this week to the United Nations General Assembly to call for censorship on a global scale.
Ardern lashed out at “disinformation” and called for a global coalition to control speech. After nodding toward free speech, she proceeded to lay out a plan for its demise through government regulation:
But what if that lie, told repeatedly, and across many platforms, prompts, inspires, or motivates others to take up arms. To threaten the security of others. To turn a blind eye to atrocities, or worse, to become complicit in them. What then?
This is no longer a hypothetical. The weapons of war have changed, they are upon us and require the same level of action and activity that we put into the weapons of old.
We recognized the threats that the old weapons created. We came together as communities to minimize these threats. We created international rules, norms and expectations. We never saw that as a threat to our individual liberties – rather, it was a preservation of them. The same must apply now as we take on these new challenges.
Ardern noted how extremists use speech to spread lies without noting that non-extremists use the same free speech to counter such views. To answer her question on “how do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists” is that you convince people using the same free speech. Instead, Ardern appears to want to silence those who have doubts. While referring to a global censorship coalition as a “light-touch approach to disinformation,” Ardern revealed how sweeping such a system would likely be. She defended the need for such global censorship on having to combat those who question climate change and the need to stop “hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology.”
“After all, how do you successfully end a war if people are led to believe the reason for its existence is not only legal but noble? How do you tackle climate change if people do not believe it exists? How do you ensure the human rights of others are upheld, when they are subjected to hateful and dangerous rhetoric and ideology?”
That is the same rationale used by authoritarian countries like China, Iran, and Russia to censor dissidents, minority groups, and political rivals. What is “hateful” and “dangerous” is a fluid concept that government have historically used to silence critics or dissenters. Ardern is the smiling face of the new generation of censors. At least the old generation of censors like the Iranians do not pretend to support free speech and openly admit that they are crushing dissent. The point is that we need to be equally on guard when censorship is pushed from the left with the best of motivations and the worst of means. As the great civil libertarian Justice Louis Brandeis once said, “the greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.”
Sean Plunket interviews Petousis Harris on the rollout of the injection including possible adverse events in terms of warning the public.
Q … “Do you think the new risk [of Myocarditis] was adequately conveyed to the public and to medical practitioners who were administering the vaccine?”
Reply … “No, I don’t”
This is really interesting because at the rollout of the injection, the FDA had already placed on their website a long list of possible side effects, very few of which were listed on the NZ Health site, indeed when posted to social media this FDA list was removed. See this article on topic
The second is uploaded at the Coronavirus Plushie video channel at bitchute.com who comment “This video was quickly deleted from the Platform’s You Tube channel, but its still on their Facebook here (above link provided).
The record rates of excess all-cause mortality in highly vaccinated countries including New Zealand show that a disaster has expanded silently and spread rapidly fanned by biotechnology lobbying and government sponsored pandemic policies. How did this happen? (If you have heretofore closed your eyes and ears, mind or heart to the accumulating scientific evidence of Covid vaccine harm published in journals, but now you wish to catch up, you can reference this succinct review on substack).
The Gates Foundation, the CDC, and our NZ health data
On Tuesday 2nd November 2021, almost a year ago, there was a meeting of the New Zealand Covid-19 Vaccine Technical Advisory Group (CV-TAG) upon which the government relies for pandemic advice. The Chair of the group is Dr. Ian Town, Chief Science Advisor to the government. “There were nine members present including Dr. Petousis-Harris, a vaccinologist at the University of Auckland who also advises Pfizer (an obvious conflict of interest), plus eight officials from the Ministry of Health, and four other guests.”
Sitting in on the meeting as a guest was Mr. John Tait, an obstetrician, the interim director and Chief Medical Officer of Te Whata Ora—Health New Zealand which was soon to take over the entire health system of New Zealand, taking it out of the diversified control of District Health Boards and into the direct control of the Government.
Point 8.3 in the minutes of the 2nd Nov 2021 meeting released under an OIA request is entitled Research Extension: Establishing a foundation for monitoring the safety of Covid-19 vaccines using primary care data. It was approved that the University of Auckland be allowed to extend a research project to establish background rates of adverse events of special interest (AESI) of COVID-19 vaccines from hospital discharge data and enable a foundation for monitoring the safety of COVID-19 vaccines using New Zealand primary care data.
The research project referred to is a partnership between the University of Auckland and the Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) to monitor adverse effects of Covid-19 vaccines around the world. Dr Petousis-Harris is co-director of GVDN which has been funded by the Gates Foundation and the US CDC.
The GVDN website says it is aiming to set up global surveillance infrastructure capable of responding to safety signals post-introduction of Covid-19 vaccines. This sounds like a laudable organisation intent on protecting public health, but.…
The other co-director of GVDN is US vaccine advocate Dr. Stephen Black emeritus professor University of Cincinnati, a pediatric infectious disease specialist. In an interview he paints a radically different picture of GVDN and indicates it is actually an organisation primarily aimed to fight vaccine hesitancy:
“While vaccine hesitancy and anti-vaccine communication have become global, the ability to respond to such concerns has remained largely fractured, without coordination between countries. This project is a game-changer. Through its scale, transparency, timeliness and open communication [???], it will contribute to vaccine confidence around the world.”
It is easy to appreciate what a prize access to New Zealand health data seemed to be for an organisation devoted to combating vaccine hesitancy and to their sponsors including the Gates Foundation and the US CDC. A remote nation with a team of five million people prepared to:
Close their borders completely to travel,
Use a single vaccine,
Coerce the entire population to be vaccinated
Collect centralised data from a universal healthcare system
Largely refuse vaccine exemptions
Seize any potential competing treatments such as ivermectin at customs.
What a contrast to the US, which has a diverse private healthcare system, a porous border, a wide range of treatments, a multiplicity of available vaccines, and a population with a tradition of freedom of medical choice.
Almost a year has gone by since GVDN was uniquely granted access to New Zealand’s primary health care data. Data that has not been made publicly available in our own country. Essential safety data that has been repeatedly requested by New Zealand researchers but remains hidden. During this time, our all cause mortality has risen to record levels close to 35% above seasonally adjusted historical trends but the New Zealand public has been given no comprehensive and accurate information about its cause by GVDN who have the data, despite its stated aim to respond to safety signals.
To establish the cause of the unprecedented rate of all cause mortality and the potential impact of vaccination on health, a researcher would need details of vaccination status and cause of death or hospital admission data broken down by age. In other words, the primary healthcare data that GVDN has access to.
Has GVDN gone largely quiet because the data shows that something has gone terribly wrong with vaccine safety?
The silence is deafening, few if any New Zealanders are aware that GVDN exists. The main source of public information is repeated government funded advertisements encouraging booster uptake along with fawning MSM articles. New Zealanders have been deliberately kept in the dark.
From the meagre information and bland safety assurances the government and MSM have publicised, it is hard to escape the notion that those with medical authority including establishment scientific bodies are happy for pandemic causal investigation to be either oversimplified for public consumption as solely the result of ‘Covid infection’ or remain largely out of the public domain.
There are some really big questions here. How much was the New Zealand government pandemic policy coordinated to suit the agenda of Pfizer, the Gates Foundation, and the US CDC? Ardern made an abrupt change between September 21st 2021 when she said there would be no penalties for the unvaccinated and October 11th 2021 when she introduced coercive mandates. What changed her mind? Was a decision taken in this period to view the New Zealand public as suitable participants in a global study?
The dangers are obvious. CV-TAG, the Ministry of Health, the government, and the University of Auckland handed over information vital for vaccine safety monitoring to an unregulated global body—GVDN—committed to eradicate vaccine hesitancy. Had the main players, including Ardern, began to aspire to leading roles in a naisant proto-global crusading medical decision-making structure?
It is startling how, in such an unregulated global organisation, the health and safety of national populations such as ours can begin to take a backseat. Had the offered carrot to become ‘a world leader in suppressing vaccine hesitancy and proving the efficacy and safety of novel biotechnology’ swayed minds to the extent that accepted standards of caution, medical ethics, and public safety could be fudged?
Just how far will the government and the medical establishment be prepared to go to sweep excess deaths data under the carpet?
This week the Justice Committee tabled a Coroners Amendment Bill for public consultation. The public has until Wednesday at the latest to make a submission here. Among its key provisions the Bill would make it clear that:
‘Coroners could record a cause of death as “unascertained natural causes” if they considered that the death was from natural causes and no further investigation was required under the Act’
In other words, coroners might be able to ease off in their traditional role to diligently pursue a cause of death. Yet any reliable mortality research requires that cause of death be made available as accurately as possible. Enabling coroners to record “unascertained natural causes” as a cause of death diminishes the availability of information vital for basic research on public health and vaccine safety.
At a time when dietary and environmental inputs and medical procedures are rapidly changing, it is essential that all possible efforts be made to ensure as much information be made available to researchers. Instead such access to the needed New Zealand health data has been quietly granted to GVDN, a global organisation with the avowed aim of tackling vaccine hesitancy.
Despite this, it remains true that deaths do not go away, they may at first be ignored, swept under the carpet, or labelled ‘unascertained’, but if excess mortality builds up, as it has, an unstoppable natural process to restore the balance of truth is set in motion. People care about their children, their families, and their loved ones. They don’t forget.
Any organisation which seeks to hide information will eventually be scrutinised. An accounting is inevitable. It may be postponed for a while, but the greater the contrived delay, the greater the perceived error.
How did those promoting mRNA vaccination get it so wrong?
Those who in November 2021 handed over New Zealand health data access were no doubt expecting a success story to unfold which would win themselves and New Zealand global plaudits and prestige. They got it wrong because they misunderstood the basic science and the safety issues of biotechnology (for more information watch my video The Pandemic of Biotechnology).
It is now clear that the toxicity of novel genetic material and its mobility were underestimated from the origin of the pandemic through to the rapid development of gene-based vaccines. More importantly, the complexity and hierarchy of genetic command and control systems in the physiology were misunderstood and oversimplified.
Certainly, it was realised that single genes do not have a single function. Genetic material and epigenetic partner structures are known to have multiple functions and to act in consort with other genes-based systems, but how many interlocking functions there are in the complexity of human physiology was radically underestimated.
Moreover, it was assumed that microbiological processes, which constantly clean up errors, foreign bodies, pathogens, and expended biomolecules, would be able to cope with injected genetic instructions and limit the extent of their influence in physiological and societal space, and over time. This assumption has proved to be in error.
The overly simplified theoretical understanding of mRNA action, and the very few experiments to assess this, were wholly inadequate to model actual in vivo processes and potential adverse effects. Moreover, negative outcomes were hidden. These have now become apparent as a result of the court-ordered release of Pfizer trial data. Data that has confirmed concerning deaths following vaccination.
What are the lessons?
Poorly-scienced public health ideas and commercial pressures have been hard at work. Naive biotech health expectations fueledm by public relations stories have played a role. Biotech vaccine innovation rapidly became a financial juggernaut whose profits exceeded commercial projections by at least ten fold. This attracted hot and greedy investment money, some of it shared by media ownership platforms. Access to New Zealand data became a prized target.
There is very little that commands respect or confidence in the pandemic response, and much to criticize. Missing in the rush to novel biomedical technology is a clear understanding of the roots of health. Our health is 99% determined by our diet, lifestyle, environment, the air we breathe, and above all by our mental equilibrium. Those in charge of New Zealand’s health chose to ignore these strong time-tested natural defenses as they enrolled us all, including our children, in a giant biotech experiment.
In a symbolic and very real way the pandemic is the beginning of the end for our medical systems, as we have known them. It was caused by all the inherent contradictions in our profit-orientated pharmaceutical/medical system, which allowed lax control of biotechnology research. Thinking that biotechnology can solve everything will always be remembered as an example of the hubris and greed of the human race. As a result we must become more respectful and more aware of the enormous complexity and protective efficiency of natural immunity and unmodified human genetics.
“A Christchurch city council hosted “meet the candidates” meeting in the lead up to the local body elections. They literally made the candidates stand up if they were vaccinated and alienated those who were not. This is simply unacceptable and disgusting.
The Christchurch City Council is literally trying to dissuade people from voting for unvaccinated candidates who do not support the woke agenda. This is not impartiality and nor is it legal for the council to tamper with elections and intervene with bias. The reaction of the locals attending the meeting is heart warming. The Christchurch City Council should be publicly shamed for their behaviour. share this video to all you know. We cannot let this be swept under the carpet.”
Note this is not new behaviour, from my own personal observations of councils in NZ. It’s become the new normal where the democratic process has gone right out the door. Meetings that appear controlled (subtly controlled by the Delphi technique in this case not so subtly) Councils it would seem, have become a law unto themselves. They are the Trojan horse for the UN Agenda 21 / 2030 agenda. There appears to be in NZ now an all out effort to dampen the efforts of those who are seeking election for Councils, who do not represent the government narrative. A government that presents itself as democratic.
In Wellington, Mayoral candidate Barbara McKenzie has encountered a similar environment of coercion and lack of ethics, quote:
“Two meetings I have attended here in Wellington asked “Do you have any association, or affiliation, with any organisation or group whose intent is to make NZ ungovernable?”. First time was at Island Bay (my very first meeting ….) and came from the residents association itself. When I answered “no” I was jeered at by the Green rentacrowd. Second time I said something like “yes, me and Tariana Turia” and funnily enough, no jeering … One meeting did the “if you’re vaccinated, stand up” thing. Another asked the same, yes or no. So I was able to answer that I’d been vaccinated for all sorts but given Pfizer’s dreadful record for fraud and injury I wouldn’t buy a toothbrush from them. Two candidates are in the habit of introducing themselves with “I’m such and such and fully vaccinated”.
The person asking the vaccinated to stand at the Christchurch public meeting was allegedly John Sellwood, a Christchurch communications professional.
Clearly the rights of the unvaccinated to choose are not respected in NZ. Neither is their privacy. Unbelievable!
Note: a link to download a template letter is now included below should you decide to make a submission EWR
Submissions invited from the public by 28th September, not long to go. This of course comes right at the same time as all cause mortality has hit a record high & is clearly causing overload on the system. It has also come right after a coroner’s ruling that Dunedin plumber Rory Nairn had died from myocarditis caused by the Covid-19 vaccine. Rory’s parents believe their son was failed by NZ’s health authorities.
This proposed Bill will fast track the process and give excessive powers of decision making around that to the coroner. At a time when deaths have increased that would surely be a time to be slowing down the process by employing more staff, not abbreviating such an important task … correctly ascertaining the cause of death no matter how long it takes … a task of providing an avenue of justice to grieving families.
All that we are hearing is that this death rate that did not exist before the jab rollout, has nothing to do with the rollout. Pure coincidence. Case closed. These unexplained deaths have even been given a title (for the more gullible to swallow): SADs they are called. Sudden Adult Death Syndrome.
Does anybody smell a proverbial rat with this? Surely?
“The Justice Committee has called for public submissions on the Coroners Amendment Bill. The bill seeks to facilitate better access to justice for families interacting with the coronial system by making amendments to the Coroners Act 2006. The bill aims to reduce the distress caused to grieving families by reducing the time spent waiting for coronial findings.
The bill would amend the Act by:
establishing a new position of a coronial associate, which could undertake many of the more straightforward functions, powers, and duties currently performed or exercised by coroners
making it clear that coroners could record a cause of death as “unascertained natural causes” if they considered that the death was from natural causes and no further investigation was required under the Act
enabling coroners to decide whether a coronial inquiry should include an inquest
enabling coroners to issue written findings stating only the cause of death, and not the circumstances, if they considered that there was no public interest in making findings about the broader circumstances.
The bill would amend the Act by:
establishing a new position of a coronial associate, which could undertake many of the more straightforward functions, powers, and duties currently performed or exercised by coroners
making it clear that coroners could record a cause of death as “unascertained natural causes” if they considered that the death was from natural causes and no further investigation was required under the Act
enabling coroners to decide whether a coronial inquiry should include an inquest
enabling coroners to issue written findings stating only the cause of death, and not the circumstances, if they considered that there was no public interest in making findings about the broader circumstances.
Consider making a submission about this, albeit late in the piece. I do honestly suspect though that your opinion will not feature too greatly in the decision making of those who are running this corporation. They’ve not been listening for a good while now.
At the end of July this year we had schools thrust into lockdown with alleged bomb threats and disturbing things happening within those schools – all in the name of protection. You can read about those at this link. Since then we’ve had an ear to the ground as they are a likely sign of things to come. The increasing number of incidents is confirming that.
It’s also evident that schools have been having the required practice drills in preparedness for an emergency of the kinds that occurred in July. Whilst it is good to be prepared, as with any fire drill, nevertheless these weapon or bomb type scenarios have the potential to be very frightening. It is well to discuss them with your children so they are prepared. A parent who contacted us this week after one of those imposed lockdowns in a Taupo high school on the 22nd said their child was shaken by what happened.
The message sent to parents of that school reads as follows:
Kia ora, on Police advice we have been asked to go into lock down as of 9:50am this morning. The incident is not school related and NOT on school site. Your children are safe and indoors currently. Please DO NOT come into school. Police will advise us when we can come out of lockdown and then I will email and text again. Signed by principal.
The parent who contacted us had also noticed other recent lockdowns around NZ. A quick search reveals there indeed have been four since the late July one. That is four in the short space of six weeks. There may be others however the ones our search revealed are as follows below. Notably one had also occurred in Taupiri on June 14th, 2022, so six weeks prior to the late July ones:
Police locate youth with BB gun, schools lift lockdown in Cambridge NZ Herald 19 Sep, 2022 11:25 AM Schools and early childhood centres in a Waikato town are now out of lockdown after police located a youth with a gun. A police spokesperson said Cambridge schools had been advised they could lift lockdowns following an earlier incident. “Police have located and are speaking with a youth, who was found to be in possession of a BB gun. “Officers have been stood down from the area.” Cambridge High School had issued a statement saying: “Because of police instructions regarding a local situation, the school has gone into lockdown.” “All students are safe in their classrooms and will remain there until the police give the all clear.” https://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/police-locate-youth-with-bb-gun-schools-lift-lockdown-in-cambridge/4B73P57MLNOEOTWT75QQPRUWEQ/
‘Person of interest’ sighting prompts Taupō schools lockdown 22 Sept 2022 Several Taupō schools went into lockdown on Thursday after police said a “person of interest” was spotted on Spa Rd. The schools in lockdown include Taupo-nui-a-Tia College. In a written statement, police said they received a call shortly before 9.30am on Thursday reporting “a person of interest in Spa Road, Taupō”. “As a precaution a number of schools in the area were advised that police were conducting enquiries in the area – the decision whether to lock down rests with the schools,” a police spokesperson said. “Police made enquiries and were able to ascertain that no threat was posed and no offence had been committed.” https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/129960316/person-of-interest-sighting-prompts-taup-schools-lockdown
By way of example, below is a copy of notice of a lock down drill in one NZ school, posted by a parent who had expressed concern. In it note, it is possible parents will not be able to contact their children or pick them up, for reasons stated. This, understandably, is what concerns parents. Read NZ’s Department of Education statement about these lockdowns at this link. Today, the parent who made contact with us about the Taupo college incident said one girl had had a seizure during the incident and although the teacher comforted her, it’s alleged they were not allowed to call out by phone for outside help.
This Friday during Tūhono time we will be running a lockdown drill. If you are around the college at this time you will hear repetitive short bells ringing, which is our signal for lockdown. We ask you to head into Te Manawa and follow instructions of staff if you are onsite at the time.
During a drill, classroom doors are secured and the students remain inside the room until instructed by the teacher to resume their activities. All exterior doors are locked and no one is permitted to enter or leave the building. Please note that in the event of a real lockdown situation this procedure will stay in force until police instruct us that it can be lifted.
In the future, should you hear of a lockdown or evacuation at the school, we advise you not to attend the school or phone as we will not be able to respond. Your presence or contact may make it more difficult for us or the emergency services to manage a situation.
Also note that during a lockdown it is likely that police will have access blocked until the situation is resolved. In all lockdowns we are advised by the police as to what actions to take.
Please note – it may not be possible to immediately notify parents of a lockdown in force. Police recommend we do not notify parents to avoid concerned parents arriving in the area making the police job more difficult.
Our emergency contact plan for parents and caregivers:
· Any information pertaining to an emergency occurring at the school will be updated on our Facebook and/or School App as regularly as possible.
· All students who are picked up from the classroom or evacuation points by parents or caregivers must be marked off on the class roll. All parents and caregivers must report to the office when picking up their children.
· Students are not to contact parents by cell phone or personal IT device unless given permission by their teacher.
· Parents will be contacted as soon as the lockdown is over.
Please contact me if you have any questions about our lockdown procedures.
Thank you for taking the time to read about our procedures.
Ngā mihi nui
This is not intended to scaremonger, however we are drawing your attention again to the Ministry of Education’s statement of rights in terms of your children that you may not be aware of. Perhaps read them again and contact your school to clarify possible scenarios before they happen, particularly with regard to your child’s and your own parental rights.
Note also, previous incidents in NZ reveal that our Police appear to be untrained in managing these frightening scenarios where children are involved. Read related below. It makes reference to the children in the Tuhoe raids in 2007 where children were seriously frightened by Police.
The International Health Regulation (2005) and the 75th World Health Assembly: Saved by Africa and BRICS Countries
Where We Are At – A Downward Trajectory
We are rapidly approaching the one-year anniversary of the infamous inflexion point that divided our nation. The government has now done a U-turn on the vaccine and mask mandates and it is likely, given the pressure on New Zealand businesses, the private sector will follow, saving many the agonising decision of whether to inject themselves yet again with an intervention that does not prevent covid but may damage the immune system and potentially cause irreparable harm.
Reports from the UK show that it is progressing along a trajectory of recovery, at least with respect to the pandemic and its unprecedented measures. The picture seems more mixed in the other commonwealth nations and the United States. Here in New Zealand the recovery curve appears stunted as much of the population still hasn’t broken its entrainment and is oblivious to what is unfolding in the world at large.
We have seen a single revealing inconsistency that may signify a shift in the prevailing narrative. The sudden flurry of unsubstantiated and callow “hit pieces” which have been directed at prominent members of a community in search of scientific truth seems out of place. So why is it happening now? This is perhaps a sign that somewhere the message is starting to penetrate the façade. It’s a strange phenomenon watching journalists sacrifice their professional standards and journalistic integrity in the pursuit of character assassination at any cost.
The shallow, slanderous and vexatious attack directed at Dr Guy Hatchard has been a great disappointment and has once again confirmed that the media, irrespective of its shade, will only ask questions as long they remain within certain clearly demarcated boundaries. The brash and dismissive rhetoric of the offending organisation, while perhaps marketable, does little to answer important questions for the people of New Zealand. Its trademark tone and blunted lowbrow tenor are a poor substitute for the candid yet courteous discussions that once took place between inquiring minds engaged in the pursuit of truth.
Leveraging a Small International Concession at The World Health Assembly
While it is all too easy to focus on the downward trajectory of the last two years, it is at times important to reflect upon the small concessions that have been achieved as humanity pushes back against this leviathan.
In the weeks preceding the 75th World Health Assembly (22nd-28th of May 2022) NZDSOS wrote several articles placing the World Health Organisation (WHO) under the microscope and probing it’s funding mechanisms, agenda and prior indiscretions. Much of our discussion was focused on the pandemic preparedness treaty and the sweeping powers that could be granted to the WHO under its auspices.
The decision of the United States to advance the WHO agenda through its proposed amendments to the existing international health framework, the International Health Regulations (2005) brought a measure of urgency to the 75th World Health Assembly. In its submission the United States, proposed amendments to the following articles of IHR (2005). Articles 5, 6, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15, 18, 48, 49, 53, 59.
The proposed amendments carried a concerning common thread, in that they tended to confer a reduced consideration of the perspective of the affected state party in the event of a health emergency of international concern, placing them directly under the explicit guidance of the WHO. Given a little consideration, it easy to determine the mechanisms through which the proposed amendments might limit the autonomy and independence of signatory states.
Despite all of the build-up, the 75th World Assembly came and then went with little fanfare, an event without incident, conspicuous only in its absence from the reports of global media outlets. So, what was it that led to the muted reporting of such an important global event? The Washington Post had pre-framed the event with the expectation that it would be clouded by conspiracy theories, filtering its narrative through the tinted lens of partisan politics.
Certainly, concerns were raised about the competence of the WHO and the speed at which it is moving to consolidate its authority. It seems that these quite legitimate questions are being deterred through an orchestrated attempt to consign them to the realm of conspiracy theory.
While our western leaders did all they could to advance the agenda, the proposed amendments to IHR (2005) were opposed by Botswana speaking on behalf of 47 Afro nations. The African nations had reservations about the proposed amendments to IHR (2005), stating that the process should not be “fast tracked” and that any changes should be postponed and presented as part of a “wholistic package” at a later date. Malaysia and Iran also voiced reservations about the proposed amendments, while Russia and Brazil, of BRICS signalled an intention to leave the WHO.
It’s an important concession, as it has postponed the WHO’s rushed attempt to use its own chaotic pandemic response to consolidate its power. It has created breathing space and has provided a window of opportunity to raise awareness in preparation to oppose the more pervasive and definitive WHO pandemic preparedness treaty.
The Pandemic Preparedness treaty is currently in draft form and resides with an intergovernmental negotiating body (INB). It is anticipated that a progress report will be presented at the 76th World Health Assembly in 2023 and on the current timeline, the final outcome will be submitted for consideration at the 77th World Health Assembly in 2024.
We have a window, so let’s use it wisely, keep applying pressure and work on the alternatives required to furnish a world that is more suited to supporting the aspirations of humanity.
Robert Deutsch predicts there will be devastating flooding for the Gisborne-Napier region in coming days. He shows that the North Island is going to be hit by a large atmospheric river of moisture, that has been brought to New Zealand artificially by a process of weather engineering, (geoengineering). He said “the winds are not going to be pleasant, either.” There will be four days of solid geo-storming. Deutsch is a weather forecaster who describes how beams of electromagnetic radiation and atmospheric aerosols (chemtrails/chembombs) can be used to manipulate wind speeds, rain patterns, temperatures and atmospheric highs and lows. He produced this video at approximately 8.30am (NZT) on the 19th of September, 2022.
Why is the weather being manipulated? There is a war against humanity going on and as a part of this, the weather is being engineered to win sympathy for anti-human, anti-freedom “climate change” agendas. Help to expose the…
A gardener this week phoned me asking about roses and what should he be doing this time of the year?
He suggested that I should write an article about roses so here is a copy of a past article I wrote over 5 years ago and revised now:
There is something special about roses that gardeners like.
It could be the shape and form of the flowers; it maybe the exotic perfumes some varieties have; or it could be something in our genes, because roses must be the oldest cultivated ornamental plant in the history of the world.
In Nature things such as leaf diseases (black spot, rust etc) and insect pest attacks on plants is part of life but when it comes to the rose enthusiast these natural occurrences are like the end of the world.
Woe betide a blemish to the foliage or an aphid feeding on the newly forming flower buds in spring.
It is war and every chemical of mass destruction will be mixed and used to control and eradicate.
The goal is the perfect bloom (with a tear drop of dew on a petal) framed by perfect foliage of a dark rich green. Picture perfect and hopefully with a divine scent to boot.
For those that show their roses at their annual local rose show or in the national rose shows the perfect specimen is the ultimate challenge.
I remember in days gone by when chemicals; that have since been banned because of the damage they did to the environment and to our health, such as Shield for Roses.
These would be used religiously by gardeners on their beloved roses biweekly.
Alternating with Super Shield and applications of Rose Fertiliser and Nitrophoska Blue.
If the rose sprays did not do what was expected there were other lethal chemicals to use, Captan, Bravo, Orthene, Target and Maldison. (All banned now as far as I am aware)
To say that the health of the roses was compromised would be an understatement and every season instead of the perfect rose the plants would be a very sore sight.
Years ago I recognised the problem that the chemicals were doing to the soil life and the immune systems of the roses and wrote articles on the matter.
I remember a Garden Centre owner in the Taranaki region telling me how she read my articles on roses and followed the advise. Within a couple of seasons she had turned the sickly roses in her home garden into lovely roses.
The local rose society members visited the gardens and were amazed at how healthy her roses were and wanted to know what chemicals she was using to have them looking so great.
Her reply was no chemicals which the members had problems believing because they had been indoctrinated into Shield, Nitrophoska etc as the ultimate tools of rose perfection.
The products made the companies that sold them a lot of money but did nothing for the health of the roses or the health of the users.
Here is a little logic I remember as a boy visiting my uncles farm in Taranaki where my auntie had a few rose bushes between a paddock and the gravel driveway.
Besides the dust on the plants in a dry summer and the occasional cow or possum nibbling the foliage they were very healthy.
They had some horse or cow manure thrown at them from time to time and cut back in the winter along with a bit of a tidy up.
Another aspect was that being in the country the plants were not suffering from chemicals in the water such as Chlorine. Just rain water from the sky or the tank.
I remember another rose enthusiast who also told me that his parents were great collectors of roses and had over the years several hundred specimens on their farm property which he was also involved in their care.
He told me how over the years of growing up how wonderful and healthy the plants had been.
As ‘new’ things were introduced to assist with the rose care, the health of the roses deteriorated so more stronger chemicals were used to no avail.
His parents passed and it was then his sole responsibility to care for the sick inheritance.
No matter what he used, how much he sprayed the roses only got worse and one winter after another poor health season he was seriously considering plowing all the roses into the ground as they were hopelessly sick and some had already died.
He told me he read an article I wrote about rose health and a program to follow and decided to give it a go for one last attempt.
What happened was that season there was a marked improvement in the roses, not up to their former glory but certainly heading in the right direction.
Then in the following season most of the roses turned to their full health state and a phone call to thank me was made. He said that my advise was the best gift to his deceased parents ever.
It is just common sense really, work with Nature not against it.
Chemicals are designed to kill and control; they can kill both the good as well as the bad plus adverse side effects as we commonly see with our own human pharmaceutical concoctions.
Chlorine in water is bad news for soil life so if you have this poison in your tap water then see about removing it with a 10 micron carbon bonded housing and filter. Email me for more info if interested.
Next stick to natural things to feed your roses (and other plants) this includes all animal manures including sheep manure pellets, blood & bone, compost that is not made from green waste.
(I know people that have lost their roses to compost containing herbicides from green waste)
The compost is used to cover over the blood & bone etc.
For extra minerals use Wallys Unlocking your Soil twice a year and Ocean Solids once a year.
Apply a little Fruit and Flower Power once a month during flowering season.
Spray your roses 2 weekly with Magic Botanical Liquid (MBL) This will do more for your roses health than anything that I know of.
Once a month spray them with Perkfection starting in Spring when there is a good show of leaves. Perkfection can be added to every second spray of MBL.
Any sign of aphids spray just before sunset with Wallys Super Pyrethrum, it is a quick knock down control.
During season any sign of leaf diseases spray with potassium permanganate at a quarter teaspoon per litre of water.
Here is something that you may find interesting; a Peer reviewed study about climate change that was released recently
New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990. Part II of the Act covers a broad range of Civil and Political Rights. As part of the right to life and the security of the person, the Act guarantees everyone:
1The right not to be deprived of life except in accordance with fundamental justice (Section 8)
2The right not to be subjected to torture or to cruel, degrading, or disproportionately severe treatment or punishment (Section 9)
3The right not to be subjected to medical or scientific experimentation without consent (Section 10)
4The right to refuse to undergo any medical treatment (Section 11)
Furthermore, the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 guarantees everyone: Freedom of Thought, Conscience, and Religion. This includes the right to freedom of thought, conscience, religion, and belief, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO ADOPT AND HOLD OPINIONS WITHOUT INTERFERENCE (Section 1)
WithQueen Elizabeth II having passed on now, her legacy will continue of course, in her offspring. This is a Queen who has expressed throughout her lifetime, an allegiance to Jesus Christ. It is difficult however, to reconcile her words with her actions.
To begin, let’s start with the obvious and her response (or lack of) to her sons’ association with known pedophiles.
Andrew’s with Jeffrey Epstein and Charles’ with Jimmy Savile. These and similar variations of the same within her royal brood have known no bounds in recent years. Take the ‘carry ons’ for instance of the Prince widely considered to be her favourite son.
The Royal stance about that was made quite clear when Prince Andrew’s suitability for public office was questioned by Labour’s Justice spokesman in the House of Commons, following the publicity around Andrew’s unsuitable close associations. He was sharply warned by the Speaker that his references to royalty should be ‘very rare, very sparing and very respectful’. There you have it in a nutshell …no requirement to take responsibility. And no expectation that the public should speak up about the King’s new clothes (or lack of).
The royal response to the House of Commons misspeak? :
The Duke of York is thus driven to Windsor for his proud mother the Queen to invest him. The Queen makes him a Knight Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order, the highest order in the monarch’s gift to bestow. She personally decides to accord him the insignia’s highest rank, KG, GCVO, CD, after which the two royals, mother and son, take tea.
There’s much more as we know… and we’ve not even touched on the saga that was Diana, or Charles’ carry on with Camilla whilst married to the former. The Queen’s response to Andrew’s behaviour is telling enough.
Investigative Journalist John Pilger writes that it was the British who invented the modern arms trade in 1860, a trade that is now run for and by governments. The innocent victims of these wars are of course citizens, in particular the children. During the war on Iraq he says, an estimated 50 children died each day as a result of the deliberate bombing of Iraq’s water, power and sewage systems. (Distant Voices, Pilger, p156). :
“‘The British are really rather good at making certain kinds of weapons,’ said Prince Charles at the Dubai arms fair, where he was promoting the British arms industry, as his family frequently does. He happened to be standing near an ‘anti-personnel’ weapon designed specifically to destroy, not objects, but as many people as possible. ‘It’s the hoary old chestnut,’ he said. ‘If we don’t sell them, someone else will'” (Hidden Agendas, Pilger, p 119).
How Queen Elizabeth II profits from the arms trade
To the Queen’s advisers she must seem the ultimate insider trader as, thanks to her royal boxes, she’s ahead of the game. Having advanced knowledge of any country’s ups and downs is useful, as in racing, to those buying and selling.
On the Queen’s accession it was said that she was worth 300 million pounds. Now the royal nest egg’s said to be 17 billion. Her investments in BP & in Rio Tinto Zinc mean very simply, she profits from petrol and uranium, and her subjects get ill.
After the Queen had been the first to switch on nuclear power at Calder Hall in Cumbria in the 1950s the world’s first nuclear power station was followed by Sizewell B and the Queen was advised to invest in uranium. Not withstanding any greenwash, royal gamblers have few ethics, and despite a feigned concern, Royalty knows that arms are good investments, and since those with money like making more, they risk the earth’s transformation into a death star, through shells, and bombs and cruise missiles, all tipped with depleted uranium (DU), so they pierce more easily through the heavy armour and the fortifications of perceived enemies. Air, water and soil are contaminated when DU is used.
Dr Doug Rokke, the ex director of the Pentagon’s DU Project says there is no way to decontaminate an area hit with Uranium.
“We also know it happens forever, therefore when the army personally says that food and water will be contaminated and that it’s an indiscriminate killer, that makes the use of DU a crime against God and a crime against humanity”.
Dr Jay M. Gould: “A large part of the baby boomer generation have had their immune systems compromised at worst.”
Dr Jay Gould would reveal in his book The Enemy Within: The High Cost of Living Near Nuclear Reactors, the extent of royalty’s uranium investments, and their uranium wealth was hot-housed by an entrepreneur Tiny Rowland. Thanks to Tiny Rowland’s companies Lonrho and Rio Tinto. Tiny Rowland asset stripped half of Africa, and though this takeover bid for Harrods was called the unpleasant and unacceptable face of capitalism he was popular with the Royals and the mega rich.
“Tiny Rowland says he loves Africa because Africa has enriched him …he definitely loves it because it has enriched him.” Dr Mathias Mpande, Deputy Minister of Mines, Zambia.
Interviewer to Rowland: “Anything that has been brought to light as a result of the Lonrho affair, do you find any of that in any way the unacceptable face of capitalism?”
“I can’t judge because this has not escalated into a political matter and I know so little about politics here that I just, I can’t comment.” Tiny Rowland.
Never mind that Rowland was formerly Rowland Fuhrhop, an unashamed member of Hitler Youth. Princess Alexander’s husband, the Queen’s nephew, Angus Ogilvy, would sit on Rowland’s board with Royal approval.
The Royal shares would thus finance the army of Africa in Lonrho’s resource wars.
African leaders promised Lonrho that their strategic minerals were armed to the hilt by Ogilvy and Rowland. Tiny Rowland was nicknamed the Royals’ Buccaneer and how much he made them is unknown, but the condition of his African workforces were notorious, and so Africa fueled new spurts of Royal wealth.
The Anti-Slavery Society reported in 1987 that in Lonrho’s shanty goldmines 60 boys had to work almost naked in a pool of cyanide at Lonrho’s extractor plant in Ghana. The cyanide used in separating out the gold enters the body as gas, liquid or acid dust. The boys worked naked, since on Rowland’s orders this was company policy to reduce theft.
In 1973 Lonrho was the biggest plantation owner in Africa, controlling 98% of oil imports through its pipelines. It mined for example, 40% of Zimbabwe’s gold, and it was the largest agricultural producer, thus, thanks to their pet buccaneer, the Royal shareholders were re-colonizing Africa by the back door. And thus, thanks to Tiny Rowland’s advice their uranium holdings are now worth more than 6 billion dollars.
But just as England was wont to conquer others, as Shakespeare wrote, she has made a shameful conquest of herself. A uranium wind can now blow back into the faces of these profiteers with their poisons being impossible to decontaminate. Thanks to uranium investors, radioactive isotopes are now found in the flesh of worms. At a Ministry of Defense weapons range in Dumphries, DU has turned the worms mutant. Worms are a pillar of ecosystems through aerating the soil and aiding the nutrient uptake of plants whom Charles reputedly likes to talk to, though he may now need a geiger counter before addressing his radioactive trifids in Scotland. However, there’ll be no apology from the Palace for any carcinogenic carnage, since DU, hardening the tips of shells to pierce concrete is one of the Royal Ordinance’s star exports.
Despite the Royal Ordinance’s weapons that contain DU, such as those made at Fazakerley, Liverpool counting as poison gas weapons, violating the Geneva Convention under the 1925 Geneva Poison Gas Protocol. The DU shell, which the sovereign has shares in is a highly mobile indiscriminate killer. It’s described as a permanent terrain contaminant, which has a half life of 4.5 billion years. Unlike any hereditary monarchy however historic, DU stains the environment for ever and ever. Its half life has earned it the title of a silent killer. The silent killer that will never stop killing. And there’s nothing depleted about DU when you see the birth defects it causes … swollen heads, enlarged eyeballs, dysfunctional limbs, as DU rewrites DNA codes making them into nonsense.
“What this has generated is from 2004 up to this day we are seeing a rate of congenital malformations in the city of Fallujah that has surpassed even that in the aftermath of, in the wake of the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki that nuclear bombs were dropped on at the end of World War II” Al Jazeera News.
While the British government was waging its illegal war in Iraq it increased the value of the Royal investment, for the price of uranium would rise 500% in six years.
This Royal preponderance with arms investments is surely concerning? It appears to have taken precedence back in the 1970s also when Great Britain under a pretext of lies, evicted two thousand or so Chagossians from their homeland of Diego Garcia, a British colony in the Indian Ocean, in order to grant the US their wish to obtain that people’s island (uninhabited) for a military base. They would use it later as a platform for bombing Iraq and Afghanistan.
Diego Garcia and the Chagossian People
The British had struck a deal with the US during the 1960s for the acquisition of the island. Deviously tricked into compliance and lied to by the official British representative living on the island, the Chagossian people were first terrorized and intimidated via the gassing of their pet dogs, then dumped on a cargo ship and transported wholesale to a nearby island, and left in an abandoned housing complex with no water or means of survival. Many died of sadness and suicide. Years later, when these displaced and original inhabitants of Diego Garcia won in the British High Court the right to return to their homeland … Queen Elizabeth exercised her Royal prerogative and declined them that right. (See here also). As Pilger points out in his doco, ‘dictators do this … but without the quaint ritual’, (as in how this prerogative plays out in a ritual at the Palace). This episode in British history is little known to mainstream readers. I first saw it in 2004, with the initial release of John Pilger’s documentary ‘Stealing a Nation’ a day or two before Christmas when everybody is too busy to pay attention, (peak viewing time if you want information to fly under the radar).
You can watch the doco at the link and learn of the sordid details for yourself. (Visit this website to support the Chagossian people.)
And so, as Great Britain moves on with their new (unelected) king in place, remember Charles is totally in sync with imposing the so called ‘Great Reset’ upon a world that never even asked for it. So much for professions of democracy.
The term “manufacturing consent” was initially coined by Edward S Herman and Noam Chomsky.
“Manufacturing consent” describes a propaganda model used by the corporate media to sway public opinion and “inculcate individuals with values and beliefs…”:
The mass media serve as a system for communicating messages and symbols to the general populace. It is their function to amuse, entertain, and inform, and to inculcate individuals with the values, beliefs, and codes of behavior that will integrate them into the institutional structures of the larger society. In a world of concentrated wealth and major conflicts of class interest, to fulfill this role requires systematic propaganda. (Manufacturing Consent by Edward S. Herman and Noam Chomsky)
“Manufacturing consent” implies manipulating and shaping public opinion. It establishes conformity and acceptance to authority and social hierarchy. It seeks compliance to an established social order. “Manufacturing consent” describes the submission of public opinion to the mainstream media narrative, to its lies and fabrications.
In this article, we focus on a related concept, namely the subtle process of “manufacturing dissent” (rather than “consent”), which plays a decisive role in serving the interests of the ruling class.
Under contemporary capitalism, the illusion of democracy must prevail. It is in the interest of the corporate elites to accept dissent and protest as a feature of the system inasmuch as they do not threaten the established social order. The purpose is not to repress dissent, but, on the contrary, to shape and mould the protest movement, to set the outer limits of dissent.
To maintain their legitimacy, the economic elites favor limited and controlled forms of opposition, with a view to preventing the development of radical forms of protest, which might shake the very foundations and institutions of global capitalism. In other words, “manufacturing dissent” acts as a “safety valve”, which protects and sustains the New World Order.
To be effective, however, the process of “manufacturing dissent” must be carefully regulated and monitored by those who are the object of the protest movement.
On topic, years ago I purchased and read the late Joan Veon’s book called ‘Charles, the Sustainable Prince’ (discussed in this post). Written in 1997, she raises some interesting observations. Well worth the read. She discusses her belief that when the U.S. Senate signed the U.N. Charter in 1945, that is when American officially entered world government and reverted back under British rule. This book documents the role of the British royal family as a formidable power working BEHIND the scenes of the UN and the role of Prince Charles with that of sustainable development and public-private partnerships. The partnerships are, she says, an arm of the world’s growing corporatocracy and their bottom line is to take control of the assets of Government. We’ve seen enough of that in recent years. But then the role of the globalists is to do away with national sovereignty. And private property. (For a wider picture see Barry Smith’s three End Times videos on this page).
“We are at present working discreetly, with all our might, to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. And all the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands.” Arnold Toynbee – International Affairs, p.809, November 1931
Amazon’s summary of Veon’s book reads thus: “As a result of covering two dozen United Nations and U.N.-related conferences in the last four years, Joan Veon has come to believe that the connection between the British royal family and the United Nations is not coincidental but provides the way for America to be rejoined with Britain. She states that when the Senate ratified the United Nations Charter, America reverted back under British rule thus fulfilling the goals of Cecil Rhodes, the diamond and gold magnate, who left his fortune to achieve this very goal. What this means is that Prince Charles, as heir to the British throne, has a bigger role to play in world affairs than what people could imagine. She knows that he is a “Renaissance man” and a man with a mission. As a result of his behind-the-scenes role at the United Nations, Prince Charles is responsible for changing the order of life from the biblical perspective of man having dominance over the earth to one in which the earth has dominance over man. One of the major environmental philosophies which runs tantamount to this is that of “sustainable development.” Because of his global orchestrations, she has dubbed Charles “the sustainable prince.” This is a must read for all those who seek to understand the day and the hour and the powers that rule over us.”
Charles holds many titles, one of which is Principal Knight Grand Cross of the Most Honorable Order of the Bath, the Order into which Presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush were knighted after leaving office.
Charles features at the WEF touting the “Great Reset … a new initiative for a sustainable post-pandemic world, from the World Economic Forum and the Prince of Wales.”
Sky News Australia brought this to our attention back in late 2020. Below is a transcript of their major points, cited here because they include Charles’ statements about the great reset … ie where they are heading:
“Sky News Australia: I have repeatedly warned about the great reset… to take the tools of oppression used to tackle the coronavirus and use them all, lockdowns, forced business closures, exclusion zones, isolation … all of those measures, including destroying private property rights and private income in order to tackle … the climate crisis.
Schwab’s speech: “Now is the historical moment of time not only to fight severe virus but to shape the system.”
Prince Charles’ speech: “We have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path. It is an opportunity we have never had before and may never have again. So we must use all the levers we have at our disposal knowing that each and every one of us has a vital role to play.”
Antonio Guterres speech (former Sec Gen of UN, member of Portuguese Socialist Party): “The great reset is a welcome recognition that this human tragedy must be a wake up call. It is imperative that we re-imagine, rebuild, redesign, reinvigorate and rebalance our world. Rebalancing investment, harnessing science and technology and advancing the transition to net zero emissions all elements of the great reset are fundamental to building the future we need.”
Sky News Australia: This great reset is as serious and as dangerous a threat to our prosperity, to your prosperity, and your freedom as we have faced in decades. With these powerful bodies, including the WEF, the UN, the IMF, and even Prince Charles boasting, yes boasting that within a few short years … ‘You will own nothing, and you will be happy”. They are even running ads for the great reset. Whatever you want you will rent and it will be delivered by drone. The US won’t be the world’s leading superpower. A handful of countries will dominate.
A terrifying coalition of big business, big tech and left wing totalitarians are so confident and so brazen … they are now promising you will own nothing and you will be happy. What they should have added is ‘and we the very rich will own everything and be even happier.’
The great tragedy here is that Prince Charles is involved in this fascist, corporatist global push and is thereby putting our entire constitutional monarchy at risk.”
What is controlled opposition? It’s a term that gets thrown around now and then. But most people, even the brightest and smartest minds, don’t seem to actually know what it is or how to spot it, and most seem to fall for it. I fell for it in the past, I admit it. I know others who have also, and had to learn their lesson.
“The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves.” — That quote is attributed to Lenin. I’m not sure if he really said it. It doesn’t matter to me if he said it, or who said it. Whoever said it, this is exactly what the “elites”, “the establishment”, “the ruling class”, “the powers that be”, “the deep state”, the “shadow government”, “the leaders of the planet” — whatever you want to call them — this…
Robert Deutsch warns of what may be massive rain events in Australia this week and states that there could be the type of flood that has never been seen before on the face of the planet in Australia, (@ 34 minutes into the video.)
There is information related to New Zealand, where it is going to be windy again, which starts at 24.25 minutes into the film.
Hear Deutsch say that you can do an EMF forecast if you pay attention and point out that the geo-engineers could have used weather modification technology to calm the storms down, but they didn’t. Information he provides indicates that storms have been created using beams of electromagnetic radiation from a number of facilities, in conjunction with chem-bombs, to divert rivers of moisture in the atmosphere where they can be used for destructive purposes over Australasia.
Reblogging this as the topic of pack and stack housing re-emerges. We’re hearing of building up not out which those who follow the UN agenda 2030 narrative will know it is a sign of smart cities (wild areas excluded from habitation) and all they entail. For other articles on topic search here in the search box, ‘pack and stack’ … EWR
This is Agenda 21/30. To the casual eye it is nothing more than downsizing and practicality, and yes, in some cases that may be what’s wanted. Fair enough. I’m not saying every move toward tiny housing or closer living is this agenda. But in the overall larger picture, it is becoming a growing trend as this UN agenda kicks in. You owe it to yourself to read up on it. The big picture is that we will all be in the cities (google ‘smart cities’) in high rise and/or stack and pack housing. That is the plan. The Nats have sold off thousands of our state homes with large sections (prime real estate) under somewhat dodgy arrangements (follow Penny Bright’s work on Facebook) then plead ‘there’s no homelessness’ in the land of the free. Now we have the perfect ‘solution’ … tiny houses. In the city of course. Small towns…
States Deutsch, it is obvious, that there was a huge beam swat emitted from a ship off the south coast of Australia. It is hard to hide the signatures of what the electromagnetic frequencies will do and he refers to evidence of extreme weather manipulation by way of electromagnetic frequencies and pulsations.
Evidence of weather modification efforts in Australia are also shown in this video.
Stuff reported that MetService lifted all heavy rain warnings for the top of the South Island this morning, Saturday the 20th of August. The only remaining warning is for Fiordland from 5pm Saturday and that states of emergency are in place…
You will live near where you work. This plan is global & already we have signs of it in NZ. The stack & packs are situated near or around the transport/rail center of your cities. Do have a listen, hear those familiar terms, ‘sustainable’, ‘climate change’, ‘greenhouse emissions’, all very much part of Agenda 21 rhetoric. Our NZ planning documents carry the same. The ones about maintaining water quality etc certainly make you gag. The video is interspersed with the actual planning meetings … you will hear how people will be gotten out of their cars and onto bikes or public transport. Out of homes with lawns and into high rise apartments. Note how they haven’t come out and told this to our faces? It’s all gift wrapped & disguised with that new vocabulary. They are fond of repackaging. One discussion tells the planners how to disguise the term ‘toll…
“Forever chemicals are synthetic chemicals commonly used in consumer and industrial products. There are many types of these chemicals, known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Perfluooctane sulfate (PFOS) is just one type of PFAS…Researchers found that study participants with high levels of PFOS in their blood were four and a half times as likely to develop liver cancer“
(NaturalHealth365) Your liver is a vital organ with hundreds of important functions. For instance, your liver works hard to cleanse your blood of poisons and toxins.
Now, a recent study published in JHEP Reports shows a disturbing link between a synthetic “forever chemical” and deadly liver cancer. The report suggests that the higher the exposure to forever chemicals, the higher the chance of developing liver cancer.
Man-made forever chemicals linked to deadly form of liver cancer
Forever chemicals are synthetic chemicals commonly used in consumer and industrial products. There are many types of these chemicals, known as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Perfluooctane sulfate (PFOS) is just one type of PFAS.
For the JHEP study, researchers analyzed human blood and tissue samples previously collected for an epidemiological study. Researchers looked at the samples of people who did or did not develop liver cancer.
They evaluated samples taken before cancer diagnosis, comparing them to samples from those who didn’t develop cancer. Researchers found that study participants with high levels of PFOS in their blood were four and a half times as likely to develop liver cancer.
The participants who developed cancer all had high levels of multiple types of PFAS in their blood. But the strongest link was between PFOS and liver cancer. Although other studies involving animals have suggested correlations between PFAS and cancer, this is the first human study to prove it.
Here is why PFAS are bad news for your health
Forever chemicals earned their nickname because they are extremely long-lasting. They take a long time to break down, accumulating in our environment and our bodily tissues over time. Unfortunately, the use of these dangerous chemicals is still widespread, although some manufacturers have stopped using them altogether amid growing health concerns.
PFAS are present in drinking water, food, food packaging, and even cosmetics. This is bad news for your health. Besides being carcinogenic, PFAS are associated with liver damage, kidney disease, neurological damage, and autoimmune problems. And once these toxic chemicals get into your bloodstream, they’re there for the long haul.
How does PFOS lead to liver cancer?
Researchers speculate that forever chemicals impede natural liver function. For instance, PFOS may interfere with glucose metabolism, bile acid metabolism, and amino acid metabolism. When the liver can’t function normally because of metabolic disruption, fat buildup can occur within the liver. This results in a condition called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).
Those with NAFLD have a much higher risk of liver cancer. Shockingly, there has been a global uptick in the number of people diagnosed with NAFLD – with scientists estimating that a whopping 30% of the global population will have NAFLD by the year 2030.
How to minimize intake of PFAS
What can you do to keep your liver healthy and reduce your PFAS exposure? It may be hard to avoid PFAS altogether. But you may be able to minimize exposure by minimizing packaged and processed foods.
Choose organic, whole, or locally grown foods whenever possible. This will ensure you’re avoiding as many harmful chemicals as possible and help you feel your best.
An interview by Toronto Business Journal. Must watch. Packed full of very important info, more in fact than just Geoengineering. Elana is the author of several books and notably on topic, no less than three recent volumes. Must reads. EWR
Apologies, I’ve encountered some glitches in replacing dead videos among other things at this site. With WP’s new(er) system I’m a bit behind with the tech. You will note the sign up form has gone from the ‘news’ page, (among other important things).
There is a sign up form however on the ‘home’ page.
Bear with me I hopefully will have this sorted in a day or two… in the meantime you can still read. You may just have difficulty finding latest posts etc. The best way around that is to click on a post then at the bottom of the page you will see ‘previous’ and ‘next’ post options. Thanks for your patience. EWR
Everything is fake in our society today – or at least a great many things are. Our world is filled with an extraordinary amount of lies, deception, disinformation, misinformation, fakery, fraud, facades, mirages, propaganda and brainwashing.
The good thing though is that once you awaken to the deception, you can use it as a tool for raising your consciousness. The idea that virtually everything is fake can be empowering rather than depressing.
Sure, we’ve all felt overwhelmed, sad, angry and impotent at times when we’ve seen just how easily our (mis)leaders can fool the masses with sophistry and empty rhetoric, but they’ve all been placed there to challenge us to wake up more quickly and fully, and reclaim our world.
Here’s my list of the top 40 pieces of fakery in our world today:
1. Fake News
Let’s begin with the MSM (Mainstream Media), better called the lamestream media, and their “news”, which is essentially corporate infotainment. The MSM waters down the news and makes it entertaining to further distract people from things of real significance.
Calcium (garden lime) is a very basic mineral that is often overlooked by gardeners.
Kiwi gardeners in the past would dig over their vegetable garden at the beginning of winter after the last crops had been harvested.
The soil would be turned to the depth of one and a half to two spade depths, bringing the subsoil to the surface and then left in unbroken as mounds for frosts to work on.
Over these clods of soil a good coating of garden lime would be applied making it look like it had snowed after application.
The idea was to bring up from the subsoil minerals to the surface. Weeds would be buried underneath to compost down and the soil would be exposed to the elements as the lime would be washed in.
In spring these clods would break up with a light touch of the hoe turning the garden into a lovely fine tilth of healthy soil. Potatoes, brassicas and other vegetables would be
planted to not only feed the family as they were harvested but also to store and preserve surpluses for the coming winter.
Life was hard but very rewarding; it was a different world.
The principals of liming our vegetable gardens has not changed even if this practice is too often neglected these days.
I was talking to a keen gardener on the phone this week who explained to me that he was gardening naturally (without the use of chemicals) and he had felt that the results were not as good as he would have liked.
So last season he gave the garden a good dose of gypsum (calcium & sulphur) and the improvement of the crops was really noticeable. Even his dad (an old, very experienced gardener) remarked that he had finally got things right.
Getting things right can be as simple as giving your gardens a good dose of a fast acting lime.
I say fast acting because not all limes are equal in the time frame that they can be of benefit to the soil.
Some garden limes come from lime stone that can take up to 10 years to become soluble and useful in the soil.
That is like putting your money in the bank and having to wait 10 years to get any interest.
On the other hand soft limes start working for you immediately on application.
Lime sweetens the soil as we say which means it lifts the pH to be more alkaline.
NZ soils over time become more and more acidic because of our rain fall, these days likely even quicker because of pollution.
All our beneficial friends in the soil require calcium to thrive, as one source explained it; calcium is like the coal that feeds the furnace, calcium feeds the soil life making for great gardening.
Acidic soil becomes anaerobic and breeds the microbes you do not want, called pathogens or diseases.
The soil has the same principals as our own bodies, if we become acidic inside we can become sick and diseases such as cancers can thrive. If we keep our internal body alkaline then we will be much better off.
Soil pathogens can be suppressed by using Terracin followed by applications of Mycorrcin.
There maybe minerals in the soil that plants need but cant take up because of the lack of calcium.
In plants calcium is part of cell walls and membranes; it controls movement in and out of cells, reacts with waste products and neutralizes toxic materials.
Calcium activates many enzyme systems, it improves microbial activity and it enhances uptake of other nutrients.
It is essential for cell division as well as increasing cell density, and improves texture (crunch) of crops.
Calcium is critical for balancing excess nitrogen as well as disease suppression.
Having the correct amount of calcium in the soil will require less nitrogen.
The calcium will loosen the soil and make more nitrogen available.
Lack of sufficient calcium will result in the following plant disorders;
Necrosis at the tips and margins of young leaves, bulb and fruit abnormalities, (such as blossom end rot in tomatoes), deformation of affected leaves, highly branched, short, brown root systems, severe, stunted growth, and general chlorosis.
It must be remembered that these problems are caused by an inadequate supply of calcium to the affected tissues.
These deficiencies can even occur when the soil appears to have an adequate presence of calcium.
A gardening product is now available called Wallys Calcium And Health which comprises of a fast acting calcium along with important elements for your health and the health of your plants.
Calcium & Health contains fast attacking lime, magnesium, selenium, boron, sulphur, potash and phosphate in a balanced ratio for your gardens.
Using this new product on your food crops is going to help ensure you obtain these essential elements in your diet.
A number of gardeners are concerned about their bodies not obtaining elements such as selenium from the vegetables and fruit they grow.
By applying Calcium & Health to your gardens will help increase the goodness and nutritional values of your home grown diet.
Used at 60 grams per square M (scoop provided is 60 grams) or as I like to do is place a small amount into the planting hole of seedlings.
Avoid using the 60 grams around acid loving plants as it does increase the pH but about 20 grams will be of benefit without interfering with the pH to affect the plants.
I also recommend you using gypsum and dolomite in your gardens as well; these later two can be used around acid loving plants as they are pH neutral.
The important aspect to remember is that calcium is vitally important to the health of your plants and soil.
Every plant needs calcium to grow. Once fixed, calcium is not mobile in the plant.
It is an important constituent of cell walls and can only be supplied in the xylem sap.
Therefore, if the plant runs out of a supply of calcium, it cannot re-mobilize calcium from older tissues.
If transpiration is reduced for any reason, the calcium supply to growing tissues will rapidly become inadequate.
Without adequate amounts of calcium, plants experience a variety of problems as our gardening friend found out at the beginning of this article.
In NZ, “people are at the heart of policy decisions” says PM Ardern. Meanwhile, many NZ parents are concerned that their ‘open and transparent’ government is reserving the (legal) right to detain their children at school for 72 hours in the event of a health emergency, disallowing all contact with their parents. This became apparent following recent alleged bomb threats.
LISTEN AT THE LINK TO HOW AGENDA 2030 IS ‘PROGRESSING’:
Is radiation from your cell phone or cell towers harmful for your health? Or the environment? The scientific debate is on-going. Are scientific conclusions tied to the interests of those who fund the studies? How do governments make sure the radiation stays within healthy limits? What happens to insects when 5G is fully rolled out? These questions and many more are explored in this film, Something is in the air. Please consider subscribing. Subtitles can be turned on from the YouTube player.
EWR note: Josh del Sol several years back now (link below) exposed similar to that exposed in this video. The independent research in to safety in particular produces alerts for health risks, the industry funded research predictably find little if any risks. Follow the money folks.
State takeover of private land accelerates – Statement by Groundswell NZ
Anyone that owns, leases, or manages property or land in New Zealand, both urban and rural, should be very concerned about the latest developments on the West Coast. That is the message from Groundswell NZ, after over 1500 West Coast property owners received letters in the mail, out of the blue, stating that their properties had been zoned for takeover by state control and that restrictions would take immediate legal effect. There was no consultation with affected property owners and no compensation for loss of use or drop in property value. Property owners have been left in a state of shock and angry at the lack of respect and fair process.
This takeover of private land came about after the four West Coast councils released a combined district plan last week, called Te Tai o Poutini. The zonings include sites of significance to Maori, historic areas, outstanding natural landscapes, and significant natural areas (SNAs). Both urban and rural residents are impacted.
In taking this draconian action, the councils have now turned anything that has cultural, historic, or natural value into a liability. Would you want any of these features on your property if it would make you vulnerable to losing the use of your land and the resulting drop in the value of your property?
This state takeover of private land is accelerating throughout New Zealand, as local councils are being forced by Government directive to enforce unworkable regulations. The raft of ill-conceived regulations coming out of Wellington is causing considerable stress and anxiety for the thousands of people caught up by the legislation. This is the main reason Groundswell NZ started campaigning.
Groundswell NZ are calling for the West Coast councils to immediately withdraw the Te Tai o Poutini plan and to support their communities in lobbying the Government for workable legislation that focuses on achieving positive environmental outcomes, while working with and respecting the rights of people and communities.
Further down is a copy of the letter received by West Coast land owners.
Note from EWR: Peter Williams touched on this topic on Magic Talk Radio (before he unexpectedly left his position there). He raised the logical questions folk are asking as the above statement indicates. However asking questions of government has swiftly become a big no-no. Only one source of truth allowed. See our previous articles on topic here with a link to the Northland mapping of SNAs for your perusal. For your own region go to your own council website. The second article cites protests in Northland where similar letters had been sent. Last I heard they council had backed up on it. Something to watch carefully and clearly kicking up has had results. Links to the articles below:
The second article also cites Barbara McKenzie’s excellent research on topic. It features at her site titled Sto Vouno.
A final note, land grabs by governments are not new. As most indigenous folk know. It has been a reality of their existence for a very long time. Here in NZ, century before last, indigenous who did not want to sell their lands were deemed ‘rebels’ (via a government Act) and their lands were confiscated. Thereby NZ Māori lost no less than 6 million acres. That was just via confiscations. Government employed other means also. Those histories are generally little known unfortunately. Hence when told about them folk commonly won’t believe them. A source of much division and angst. I personally have heard more than one first hand example.
Ironically (or should that be strategically?) the rationale for this robbery is Agenda 21/30 speak … ‘biodiversity’ and ‘areas of significance to Māori’. Not all of us are fooled by the hypocrisy we’ve seen for more than three decades now. The professions of sustainability on council websites are belied by the widespread pollution (& cover up) that is still going on. Since the inception of Agenda 21 our waterways are more polluted, homelessness up, poverty up, unemployment up, debt up, and on it goes. (See our Local Government Watch pages, main menu).