With the pulling down of The Highwire YT channel recently (200K subscribers), It just further confirms the rampant censorship around the world from BigTech on important topics.
You will understand there’s a building narrative in NZ of a miracle coronavirus vaccine being just over the elusive horizon. Public debate should be held on the safety of any potentially rushed vaccine and of the possibility of mandatory or coercive use of the vaccine(s) here in NZ. Supplied below is a link to a petition on the NZ Government website, which sadly allows very little space for the info of the petition to be conveyed.
Petition request: That the House of Representatives urge the Government to ensure that the use of any coronavirus vaccine is voluntary in New Zealand and that no coercion will be applied to NZers from Government or private entities to take it.
Here is a short video posted on YT and Bitchute promoting this petition with an attached google docs link plus show notes of evidence and further information etc (see below)
Now that the petition is an official document and has been posted on the NZ Government’s website, it is hoped that this has at least protected the topic somewhat in NZ, hopefully enabling room for uncensored public debate on this topic.
He has said this before, in late May this year, 2020. If every you doubt this plan is global, see the synchronicity going on. We have just in NZ heard our Health Minister Chris Hipkins echo similar sentiments. And of course we have good old self proclaimed Bill Gates directing the procedure from WHO who he’s funded for a very long time with his great wealth. The man who says he wants less people on the planet (the sustainable Agenda 21 lie) while professing from the other side of his mouth that he wants to save us with his (barely tested) vaccine that ‘might not work’ (also from the same mouth). EWR
In Press Converence, Trump Announces That the Military Will Giving the Mandatory Vaccine.
Information posted at Facebook by Prof Nigel Anthony Gray
What Is the Nuremberg Code?
When World War II ended in 1945, the victorious Allied powers enacted the International Military Tribunal on November 19th, 1945. As part of the Tribunal, a series of trials were held against major war criminals and Nazi sympathizers holding leadership positions in political, military, and economic areas. The first trial conducted under the Nuremberg Military Tribunals in 1947 became known as The Doctors’ Trial, in which 23 physicians from the German Nazi Party were tried for crimes against humanity for the atrocious experiments they carried out on unwilling prisoners of war. Many of the grotesque medical experiments took place at the Auschwitz concentration camp, where Jewish prisoners were tattooed with dehumanizing numbers onto their arms; numbers that would later be used to identify their bodies after death.The Doctors’ Trial is officially titled “The United States of America v. Karl Brandt, et al.,” and it was conducted at the Palace of Justice in Nuremberg, Bavaria, Germany. The trial was conducted here because this was one of the few largely undamaged buildings that remained intact from extensive Allied bombing during the war. It is also said to have been symbolically chosen because it was the ceremonial birthplace of the Nazi Party. Of the 23 defendants, 16 were found guilty, of which seven received death sentences and nine received prison sentences ranging from 10 years to life imprisonment. The other 7 defendants were acquitted.The verdict also resulted in the creation of the Nuremberg Code, a set of ten ethical principles for human experimentation.
What Are The Nuremberg Code’s Ethical Guidelines For Research?
The Nuremberg Code aimed to protect human subjects from enduring the kind of cruelty and exploitation the prisoners endured at concentration camps. The 10 elements of the code are:
Voluntary consent is essential
The results of any experiment must be for the greater good of society
Human experiments should be based on previous animal experimentation
Experiments should be conducted by avoiding physical/mental suffering and injury
No experiments should be conducted if it is believed to cause death/disability
The risks should never exceed the benefits
Adequate facilities should be used to protect subjects
Experiments should be conducted only by qualified scientists
Subjects should be able to end their participation at any time
The scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment when injury, disability, or death is likely to occur
An update from the NZPP. Some interesting detail in this video … information re Belarus & the IMF, the president declined IMF’s billion dollar offer in return for locking down their country … also re NZ military management of CV and a further option for another NZPP merger under discussion (announcements on that soon). The advance we are seeing in media towards forced door to door testing for the CV using the military to assist with that is disturbing indeed & Kiwis are not succumbing. Also of interest, watch the latest Corbett Report below looking at the consideration of the issues around mandatory vaccination world wide. At 58 minutes in, mention is made of the NZPP’s proposed action (or inaction) on this topic. And in case you’re thinking NZ wouldn’t do that, remember Brownlee’s recent statement that he would have all 5 million Kiwis force vaccinated? I did read that twice on the internet however it has disappeared entirely now, I cannot find it anywhere. Pre the last election Labour also said they wouldn’t rule mandatory vaccination out & media have highlighted it since. Thin end of the wedge scenarios. Not rocket science to figure what’s in store from those intimations. EWR
You can hear the professor speak in the first clip below, the second is in the article from mainstream media Fox. He is saying if it’s proven safe it should be mandatory. We’ve already learned however of the anomalies and inconsistencies surrounding this issue, which does not give any great assurances about who decides it’s ‘safe’. Have a read/listen and decide for yourself. EWR
Dershowitz says forced coronavirus vaccination could happen: ‘Police power of the state is very considerable’
Harvard Law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz joined “Tucker Carlson Tonight” Wednesday to discuss the constitutionality of forcing members of the public to be vaccinated against the coronavirus, should a vaccine become available.
Host Tucker Carlson began the segment by acknowledging the argument that people “don’t have a right to endanger other people, your right to punch ends at the tip of my nose” before asking Dershowitz whether “the government has a right to endanger” people who may have an adverse reaction to a vaccine by forcing them to take it.
Here is an excellent, comprehensive overview of how to navigate your options & rights around whether or not to vaccinate yourself or your children. Some of the links no longer work however you could contact the site for further info. If there’s one thing we need it is to be prepared in advance. Better to be fully informed and know your rights than to be caught unaware & in the dark about which way to turn. EWR
Vaccination in New Zealand – Know Your Rights
Part 1 – A Quick Introduction to Your Parental Rights
New Zealand is one of the best countries in the world to be living in if you want to be able to choose what to do with you and your family regarding vaccines… one thing we need to make sure of, today and for future generations, is that it stays this way.
This comes from Jami-Lee Ross and the Advance NZ party. The only person standing up in Parliament right now to defend your right of choice with health interventions. I am posting this info because it is very pertinent right now … I am not a member of the party. Please watch & listen. EWR _____________________________________________________________________
“The bad news is – our amendment to safeguard your rights that I took to Parliament for you was rejected by other political parties.“
“Let’s step up our No Forced Vaccinations Campaign. Join the fight right now to keep protecting our personal freedoms and say No to Forced Vaccination laws: www.advancenz.org.nz/membership
If you have signed our No Forced Vaccinations petition, or you care deeply about this issue, I have good news and bad news. And we need your help to take this fight further.
The good news is – people care! Over 13,000 people have now signed our petition. Thank you again for your support!
The bad news is – our amendment to safeguard your rights that I took to Parliament for you was rejected by other political parties.
Our safeguard amendment would have made a change to the COVID-19 Public Health Response Act so the Government could never issue a notice requiring a person to be vaccinated “without the written consent of the person or, in the case of a child, the written consent of that child’s parent or guardian.”
We must retain a parent’s right to make decisions about their own family’s health and well-being.
The current Government has put in place the new law with broad and dangerous powers that gives them the ability to override your rights and the Bill of Rights.
We also know the parties in opposition have been actively pursuing “No Jab No Pay” policies.
When Parliament won’t act to protect your personal freedoms, we all need to take action and stand up for our rights. I pledge to fight this on your behalf.
You believe in personal freedom and the right to make decisions about your own body. I need your help to fight for this for you and your family.
I started the Advance NZ Party to give these issues a voice. Now together we can fight for the No Forced Vaccinations safeguard amendment.
If you want to see a change to this law, we need your help to prove to the Electoral Commission that at least 500 people support issues like this. Only by registering will the Electoral Commission let us campaign as a party on this policy.
We must never allow a Government to have the power to make personal health decisions about our bodies. Right now they have the power to do just that. Help us fix this dangerous law for the good of our country and future generations.
Join the fight right now to keep protecting our personal freedoms! It takes 2 mins to join, is confidential, and only costs $2. www.advancenz.org.nz/membership
I’m a day late posting this unfortunately, but not too late to register and view. With mandatory vaccines being touted of late, everywhere pretty much, then this is a timely offering. The Truth About Vaccines is offering their series of videos free to view for a limited time. Register & avail yourselves of this opportunity. EWR (info below)
The Truth About Vaccines docu-series is COMING SOON! Secure your free, virtual seat for the 9-day online health event right here. ➡️https://bit.ly/register-free-TTAV-2020 You may or may not have heard much about this highly argued topic, but you definitely will after this “Coronavirus quarantine” is all over. In light of the current coronavirus pandemic, doctors are weighing in, the media is weighing in, and even the government is weighing in and discussing the possibility that the coronavirus vaccine might be mandatory for everyone in the USA! States like California have already enacted forced vaccine legislation for children to attend school (both public AND private). In light of the current climate of fear and panic, it’s not a stretch of the imagination to think that legislation could be passed which requires “proof of vaccines” to travel or even assemble in a public place. It’s time to educate yourself and your family about this vitally important issue! Our brilliant team behind some of the most successful health documentary series in history has turned its eye firmly to investigating the “pro vs. anti” vaccine safety debate. We’ve pulled together more than 60 of the foremost experts on the planet to give you a “no holds barred” look at the vaccine debate so you can get the very best information for your own family. Our explosive 9 episode docu-series, “The Truth About Vaccines 2020,” is coming soon and you can watch it 100% for free. ➡️https://bit.ly/register-free-TTAV-2020
Parents should be informed about both the benefits and the risks associated with vaccines — without pressure, propaganda, or agenda.
So we brought together more than 60 of the world’s foremost health experts to investigate both sides of this contentious debate to give you the science, the history, and the untold story… the REAL information you need to make an informed decision on how to best protect your child.
What You Will Learn
The History of Vaccines
Vaccination programs are given credit for eradicating some of the most devastating illnesses of the past, but they’re no longer immune to controversy of their own.
Vaccine Risks and Safety Concerns
Concerns about vaccine injuries, mercury toxicity, and autism have increased substantially in recent years, and public debate is once again heating up.
Full List of Options and Alternatives
You don’t have to pro- or anti-vaccine anymore. New options are available to guard against serious illness, based on your unique situation and risk factors.
ALL NEW Episodes for 2020!
Two new full episodes titled: “Censorship & Suppression” and “W.H.O.’s Not Telling the Truth?”
TRANSLATION: More than 3000 people in one place for freedom of vaccination choice. No to the exclusion of children from schools due to vaccination. As long as there is risk and harm from vaccine there must be freedom of choice.
Health is not a joke, freedom of choice and safety.
The state recognizes vaccine damage in law 210/92, following the post-vaccination death of the two Tremante brothers. Despite this, thousands of cases are still pending
for compensation, including deaths.
Health Impact News Editor
Readers from Italy have been contacting Health Impact News this past week (June, 2017), asking us to cover the massive demonstrations happening throughout Italy to protest a new mandatory vaccine law. This news has been censored from the U.S. corporate media.
Francesca Alesse, who worked with the VAXXED film team to get the film shown in Italy last year, writes:
In an unprecedented way, the decree-law proposed by the Minister of Health has been signed by the sitting Italian president Sergio Mattarella. Only four vaccines were mandatory in Italy, now that number triples to 12.
No other decree-law has moved so fast in the Italian legislative system, the reasons of such hurry are incomprehensible considering that the Istituto Superiore Di Sanità (the local version of the CDC) has declared that contrary to what stated in the decree itself there is no objective urgency. There are no epidemics, the number of cases of measles or meningitis in the current year have been substantially lower than the previous year.
Thousands of parents have protested the new law this past June 3rd, protests and marches have taken place in 21 Italian cities spread across the nation. A national protest is scheduled for this Sunday June 11th.
The translated full text of the decree-law is found here.
The new law apparently has severe consequences for parents who fail to comply, including the possibility of having their children taken away from them. In addition to public outcry, there appears to be strong political opposition to the law as well.
Protests are going to increase here, as our Government has announced… a law to introduce 12 mandatory vaccines. The law…. was announced by our Health Ministry to be as follows: 12 mandatory vaccination needed to have access to pre-school system (age 0-6): no vaccination, no enrollment, no exceptions; for mandatory school (age 0-16) if kids were not vaccinated parents should pay a penalty between 500€ and 7.500€ per year, if you cannot afford it, you’ll be refer to Jouvanile Court, that could suspend your parents rights to get your children vaccinated. A national protest is envisaged in Rome on June 11.
This will start within the next school year (September 2017); it has been calculated that more then 800,000 kids will need to receive a massive vaccination in a very little time.
As you know, Italy had been chosen in 2014 as leading Country for the WHO world vaccination campaign co-financed by Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, therefore what happen here can affect also other countries.
Leaving a lucrative career as a nephrologist (kidney doctor), Dr. Suzanne Humphries is now free to actually help cure people.
In this autobiography she explains why good doctors are constrained within the current corrupt medical system from practicing real, ethical medicine.
One of the sane voices when it comes to examining the science behind modern-day vaccines, no pro-vaccine extremist doctors have ever dared to debate her in public.
Medical Doctors Opposed to Forced Vaccinations – Should Their Views be Silenced?
One of the biggest myths being propagated in the compliant mainstream media today is that doctors are either pro-vaccine or anti-vaccine, and that the anti-vaccine doctors are all “quacks.”
However, nothing could be further from the truth in the vaccine debate. Doctors are not unified at all on their positions regarding “the science” of vaccines, nor are they unified in the position of removing informed consent to a medical procedure like vaccines.
The two most extreme positions are those doctors who are 100% against vaccines and do not administer them at all, and those doctors that believe that ALL vaccines are safe and effective for ALL people, ALL the time, by force if necessary.
Very few doctors fall into either of these two extremist positions, and yet it is the extreme pro-vaccine position that is presented by the U.S. Government and mainstream media as being the dominant position of the medical field.
In between these two extreme views, however, is where the vast majority of doctors practicing today would probably categorize their position. Many doctors who consider themselves “pro-vaccine,” for example, do not believe that every single vaccine is appropriate for every single individual.
Many doctors recommend a “delayed” vaccine schedule for some patients, and not always the recommended one-size-fits-all CDC childhood schedule. Other doctors choose to recommend vaccines based on the actual science and merit of each vaccine, recommending some, while determining that others are not worth the risk for children, such as the suspect seasonal flu shot.
These doctors who do not hold extreme positions would be opposed to government-mandated vaccinations and the removal of all parental exemptions.
In this article, I am going to summarize the many doctors today who do not take the most extremist pro-vaccine position, which is probably not held by very many doctors at all, in spite of what the pharmaceutical industry, the federal government, and the mainstream media would like the public to believe.