The cases were reported between Jan. 1 and March 31, and the 246 had a positive test 14 or more days after the last dose in the vaccine series, said Lynn Sutfin, a spokeswoman for the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services, in an email.
“Some of these individuals may ultimately be excluded from this list due to continuing to test positive from a recent infection prior to being fully vaccinated,” she said.
Three videos from UK Column, an excellent channel that will update you on events in the UK. See below videos at YT for further info.
7th April News
9th April News
No Smoke Without Fire Part 4 Vaccines : Lies Damned Lies & Statistics.
UK Column 90.7K subscribers Join former NHS Nurse Debi Evans and Brian Gerrish UKColumn in a social place for a discussion on the refusal of the UK Government, NHS, MHRA and established media to tell the truth about vaccine side effects. Our conversation is based on the government’s own data, and yet it is this material and statistics which breaks open the web of lies around the COVID 19 Vaccination programme, and the serious dangers of vaccine adverse reactions. My voice was the issue not the audio editing so please stay with it, as this is the most important No Smoke Without Fire on the subject of vaccines and vaccine damage, and leads the audience towards the ultimate goal of a State where the MPs are frightened of their own government. If we allow it to happen, this is just one step on the route to a One World Government. Not our words, but those of former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown. We encourage you to watch No Smoke Without Fire Parts 1, 2 and 3 for important context. They can be found here: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list…
A vicious attack on Dr. Vernon Coleman – he says goodbye
Photo: Screenshot (Dr Coleman at Bitchute)
An article from the Herald we posted a link to this morning, originally included a sentence stating that Auckland woman, Pauline Hanna who passed away at Easter, had had her second covid shot the day prior. I quoted from it:
“‘A source told the Herald [Pauline] Hanna was still sending work emails at 10pm on Sunday and that she had had her second Covid-19 vaccine earlier that day.‘
Sincere condolences to this family.“
That sentence has since been edited out of the online version, however it remains in the hard copy (see below). Why did they remove this detail about the shot?
The NZ Herald have now updated their retraction of the sentence with:
Note: Those who opt not to vaccinate or who question the official narrative are frequently referred to as ‘anti-vaxxers’. These people are not ‘anti’ anything, they are simply pro-informed choice.
With all due respect to this family … given a full Police investigation is in progress, it is intriguing that a conclusion has already been reached that this is not related to an experimental injection administered the day before, when the FDA clearly lists death as a possible adverse effect.
To read FDA’s draft list of possible outcomes download the document, the list is on page 17:
“A source told the Herald [Pauline] Hanna was still sending work emails at 10pm on Sunday and that she had had her second Covid-19 vaccine earlier that day.”
Sincere condolences to this family.
Article from NZ Herald at the link:
Photo: Wikipedia “View of Ōhinerau / Mount Hobson and Remuera” By Bhutt – Own work, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=7541367
Our post recently about Southern Cross life insurance cover has been pointed to by Martin Harris at Uncensored as misinformation.
Firstly, thanks to Martin for keeping us on our toes, and secondly, it is never my intention to mislead & I believe the source gave it in good faith. Apologies for any inconvenience it may have caused anyone.
Anyway, I have withdrawn the post pending any further info materializing. If you have approached your own insurance company and can offer us information about their response please share.
Below here is the response by Southern Cross to Uncensored inquiries. QUOTE:
“Stephen Child, chief medical officer for Southern Cross Health Insurance has provided us [Uncensored] with an official statement.
Southern Cross follows the recommendations of the Ministry of Health and Medsafe on the management of COVID-19, and the utilisation of any vaccinations.
We would like to reassure our Health Insurance and Life Insurance policyholders that their policies will continue in the usual way and in no way be impacted if they receive a MedSafe approved COVID-19 vaccine.
In New Zealand, acute care is provided by the public health system so if treatment is needed urgently after receiving a vaccine, you should go directly to the Accident and Emergency unit at your nearest public hospital.
ACC also provides treatment and support to people if they have an adverse reaction to any vaccine if their criteria for treatment injury is met. This is why vaccine-related treatment injury is a standard exclusion in our Health Insurance plans.
Therefore, as is current practice, if you develop symptoms from the COVID-19 vaccine or any other Medsafe approved vaccine and require treatment, you can lodge a claim with ACC.
If you have any questions about the COVID-19 vaccine, please visit the COVID-19 website.” END QUOTE
With all due respect, personally I still fail to see in this statement any firm reassurance that any serious adverse reaction beyond standard reactions will be compensated for? In fact the reader is directed to ACC requirements.
The link regarding criteria does not work at Uncensored, however the info can be found at the ACC link here:
Highlighting … “A physical injury resulting from a vaccination, including the COVID-19 vaccine, may be covered if the criteria for treatment injury are met. Under ACC legislation, the injury must be clearly caused by the vaccination and must not be a necessary part or ordinary consequence of the treatment”.
I invite you now to read what the NZ vaccine expert Helen Petousis-Harris has to say about proof of causation:
“Experts reviewing the cases”… are they reviewing them? Taking this to its logical conclusion, it has already been demonstrated that the thousands of deaths being recorded, with few exceptions, the vaccinations continue.
So to summarize this point, VAERS is the CDC’s site (US) for reporting any adverse reaction following a vaccination. (Note stats for post vaccine injury in NZ will apparently not be available until July). However as is stated an adverse reaction does not indicate causality.
FYI : Consider the following feedback from others’ experience (no apology that these are Facebook comments… social media is today’s ‘town square’).
Although anecdotal with no … no proof, consider them useful background information. Unfortunately independent inquiry is unwelcome and any narrative alternative to mainstream’s ‘safe & effective’ is written off as anti-vax.
The point of concern historically is that it has become very evident in the testimonies of the parents of children who have experienced adverse events following vaccination, that MDs seldom acknowledge vaccines as causative.
I invite you to visit the VAXXED Youtube channel and browse the testimonies. Time and again their plea that their very normal and healthy child only changed directly after the jab, is refuted. Watch this very old footage on topic (see comments also).
In returning to ACC’s statement that the injury must be acknowledged as clearly caused by the vaccine, you need to be taking into account with your decision to take the CV jab, the difficulty or otherwise of obtaining any confirmation of injury from the medical profession. Already a NZ woman interviewed by Peter Williams at Magic Talk Radio has described the hostility she faced from an ambulance attendant at any suggestion that her injury was caused by the covid vaccine. In addition she had to “self-report[ed] her reaction to CARM as her medical centre refused to.”
This, people, is what we are up against. A steadfast refusal for decades to acknowledge any causative link between a jab and a reaction, in spite of the official registers recording the reactions. Do you really think that with this new experimental treatment, it is going to be any different?
I note today that the NZ Herald has reported the death (first article) and ongoing investigation by Police of an Auckland woman (second article). The Herald mentioned just once toward the end of their article that this woman had received the covid vaccine the day before. (Update: the sentence with reference to the vaccine was then removed with no explanation given.)
Still, the mantra continues. “Vaccines are safe and effective.”
I challenge you to be very specific with your insurance provider as to if and what they will cover regarding adverse reactions to the new experimental covid injection.
Note the censorship, Facebook classifies this as fake news, and it’s straight from the CDC/VAERS website.
Health Impact News
The Covid Blog
Ep 4 discusses “Informed Consent” and the Covid-19 vaccine. Sources and links in the Show Notes below (click on “SHOW MORE”)
0:16 Is the govt ‘Manufacturing Consent’?
0:43 Voluntary Informed Consent is mandatory
0:58 Chris Hipkins on vax not “compulsory”
1:51 Pfizer / mRNA vax in NZ
2:55 Ideas of Consent
3:08 The Nuremberg Code
4:41 Fifty years after Nuremberg
4:51 International Covenant on Civil & Political Rights
4:54 Public Service Vax Workforce Guide
7:51 America’s Frontline Doctors on Nuremberg Code
9:12 Critique of Public Service Guide
9:53 Resist vax-status apartheid
All SOURCES , More Information and Credits: See the SHOW NOTES: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N…
COPYRIGHT CREDITS (in video order) and thanks to:
“FAIR USE” VIDEO & SOUND clips These are used for the purposes of education, discussion and commentary:
(3 Sept 2020) “Coronavirus: Health Minister Chris Hipkins quashes rumours Covid-19 vaccine will be compulsory” [Stuff] https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/heal…
(9 Apr 2020) CNBC “Bill Gates explains the work his foundation is doing to combat coronavirus” [YouTube from 3:27] https://youtu.be/EjgbMib36do
(3 Apr 2021) World Doctor’s Alliance “Vaccine Passports are a coercive tool to force social compliance – Americas Frontline Doctors” [BrandNewTube] https://brandnewtube.com/watch/vaccin…
(16 Aug 2018) “What are the ages of sexual consent around the world? ” [SBS] https://www.sbs.com.au/language/engli…
“Defendants seated under guard in the dock behind the defense counsel during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947”.[ushmm] https://www.ushmm.org/information/exh…
“Brigadier General Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel, during the Doctors Trial, which was held in Nuremberg, Germany, from December 9, 1946, to August 20, 1947.” [ushmm] https://www.ushmm.org/information/exh…
(undated) “G E Free Zone” [Source unknown – social media meme]
LICENCED CLIPS: “Sunrise” video – Bellergy (Pixabay licence) In Intro & Outro: “The Last Days” Lyrics, music and performance © S Stevenson (with permission) A PETITION to the NZ PARLIAMENT was earlier promoted on this channel on the topic of “Informed Consent” re the vaccine. https://youtu.be/O–hz53ACVo Petition request: (300 character max) “That the House of Representatives urge the Government to ensure that the use of any coronavirus vaccine is voluntary in New Zealand and that no coercion will be applied to NZers from Government or private entities to take it.” The petition ran until 5 Nov 2020 and received 5,000+ signatures. A detailed supporting document was provided to the petition site, but could not be linked to the petition as no space is provided for evidential support on the government website. You can access (and download) that document here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14… SUBSCRIBE for an alert for the next episode in the series. Tribe of Kiwis is a place for conversation about things that matter to ordinary Kiwis – people who want to consider and share information important to our shared future …… and that of our children and grandchildren. Email: email@example.com
The COVID-19 vaccination drive was kicked off on January 16 in India. Since then, at least 19 health workers have died post-vaccination. Doctors and public health experts write to the health ministry, demanding an investigation into the deaths.
Photo: Ministry of Health. Frontline workers were vaccinated against COVID-19 in Gujarat.
Dr Vernon Coleman is a retired UK GP. He speaks from experience here. He is not ‘bought’ by the Pharmaceutical industry. You would do well to heed his info garnered from a lifetime’s experience. EWR
From Dr Vernon Coleman, MB ChB DSc FRSA
The pro-vaxxers like to tell you that vaccines are perfectly safe and perfectly effective. Even when they wouldn’t be considered safe enough to use as oven cleaner, the fanatics enthuse about them. Young people and those who know little about medicine or science, talk about vaccines with reverence because they’ve been indoctrinated into believing the pro-vaccine lies.
And the pro-vaxxers are lying, of course.
Vaccines cause a lot of illness and quite a few deaths and they don’t always do what they’re supposed to do. Governments around the world have paid out many billions of dollars to patients who have been made ill by vaccines – or to the relatives of patients who were killed by a vaccine.
There are, for example, grave doubts about what the covid-19 vaccine actually does. Since the vaccine is a new type of vaccine and is being given before the usual tests and observations have been completed no one knows what will happen to the people who have the stuff injected into an arm.
What side effects will there be? How many will die?
Well, I don’t know and nor does anyone else.
What if a woman is pregnant when she has the vaccine or gets pregnant after being given the vaccine? The vaccine isn’t supposed to be given to pregnant women but not all pregnancies are planned.
Will the vaccine interfere with essential life-saving drugs? Many elderly patients already take a number of prescribed drugs. Will the vaccine interfere with them? No one knows. The covid-19 vaccine is the biggest experiment in history. And, unlike a proper clinical trial, it is largely unregulated. As with all vaccines most of the problems which develop will never be reported or recognised.
It is estimated that in the U.S., only 1 in 100 vaccine side effects is reported.
The best we have is a working list of possible adverse event outcomes which the FDA has published in the US. (Here is the link to the draft working list)
Since I believe everyone is entitled to know what side effects there could be with a heavily promoted vaccine, I’m going to read you the official list of possible side effects. This is, remember, not my list but a draft list compiled by the FDA – the Food and Drug Administration in the US.
Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis
Acute myocardial infarction (heart attack)
Pregnancy, Birth outcomes
Other acute demyelinating diseases
Non anaphylactic allergy reactions
Disseminated intravascular coagulation
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children
Vaccine enhanced disease
You aren’t necessarily going to get all of those or even any of them if you have the vaccine. But those are the possible side effects that the FDA has listed. They’re all unpleasant, most of them very serious and you can’t get more serious than death.
And if you are mad enough to have the vaccine then you and your doctor should keep a look out for the symptoms of all the diseases on the FDA’s list.
Your government won’t tell you about these dangers – they don’t believe in fully informed consent as far as vaccines are concerned.
Indeed, most governments are now doing everything they can to ensure that all criticisms of vaccines are banned. Depending on where you live it is, or soon will be, illegal even to mention that vaccines might not always work or might make you ill.
Finally, if your government really cared about you they would conduct a very simple, cheap trial.
They would keep a note of all the health problems affecting 20,000 patients who had the vaccine and compare that list with a list of all the health problems affecting 20,000 patients who didn’t have the vaccine in the same period. They make the comparisons every 3, 6 and 12 months.
Of course, they’d have to find some honest doctors to oversee the trial because it would be very easy to fiddle.
But it would give some very interesting results so I doubt if they’ll be doing it.
Please share this article with everyone you know.
(Note: click on ‘Health’ in left hand column, then ‘UPDATED 2nd April – How many are the vaccines killing?‘ in the list)
Bit late notice sorry. Just seen this & posting FYI for those who may not be aware. (For Sue’s letter to government see this post):
About twelve hours ago I passed a sort of personal milestone: I found, and read, an ecstatic Facebook post from the twentieth person I know who has received a dose of one of those experimental drugs the U.S. government, at a cost of hundreds of millions of dollars of our money, is trying to persuade us to turn loose on our immune systems.
by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News
As can be expected when new experimental “vaccines” that are not approved by the FDA are given emergency use authorization to fight a “pandemic” that is now over a year old, reported deaths following the injections of these shots have now skyrocketed in the U.S. population by over 6000% here at the end of the first quarter of 2021, as compared to recorded deaths following FDA-approved vaccines at the end of the first quarter of 2020.
These new products, which many doctors and scientists claim do not even meet the legal definition of a “vaccine,” are described by the manufacturers themselves as “operating systems” called the “software of life,” and prior to COVID they have never been approved to be used on human populations.
There are literally thousands of doctors and scientists around the world who have spoken out against these experimental injections, some even calling them “biological weapons of mass destruction.”
I believe that this is the US. Much bluff is going on as I hear from people in other places. I get interesting feed back even from NZ on the bluffing that happened during our major lockdown in 2020, where ‘Nazis’ (officials from various health/local/authorities etc) show up at said venue ordering them to shut down. (In the instances I’ve heard… shops basically). When bluff was called they did not return. That looks like outright bullying and intimidating folks into believing they had to. This is illustrated clearly in this video. The bullies stand around a bit trying to get a word in, but clearly have no legal mandate (or they would stay & arrest or enforce their ‘laws’), instead they all retreat & clear off. Remember the suicides we had in NZ? A butcher in Auckland took his life, his business ruined. Very sad. Does Jacinda Adern care about those? I don’t believe so. EWR
Watch a video of this event at the link below:
Photo: screen shot
“And I looked, and behold a pale horse: and his name that sat upon him was Death and Hell followed with him.” Revelation 6:8
Here’s your Vaccine puzzler for the day:
Answer— They all died shortly after getting the Covid-19 vaccine.
But let’s not jump to conclusions, after all, in every case, the media has assured us that the vaccine had nothing to do with their deaths. Do you believe that?
Of course, not, but that will probably not undermine your trust in vaccines because–as you know– not trusting vaccines is tantamount to putting on a tinfoil hat and blabbering conspiracy theories about pedophile rings in the basement of pizza parlors. It’s absolute lunacy. One must never question the unshakable integrity of the big pharmaceutical companies who only produce these miracle drugs for purely philanthropic reasons. It’s inconceivable that these experimental concoctions –which have never been tested on animals or undergone long-term trials– might have been created for political purposes rather than medicinal. Is that even remotely possible?
A doctor from Northern Ireland has come out strongly against COVID hysteria and the sinister agenda behind it in a viral video spreading across social media. Listen at the link below:
The UK Government have released a report highlighting adverse reactions to both the Pfizer and Oxford / Astrazeneca that have occurred since the rollout began on the 8th December and it does not make for pleasant reading.
The report has collated data inputted up to the 24th January 2021 via the MHRA Yellow Card Scheme. At this point an estimated 5.4 million first doses of the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine and 1.5 million doses of the Oxford University/AstraZeneca vaccine had been administered, and around 0.5 million second doses, mostly the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, had been administered.
READ AT THE LINK:
A letter here from a NZer, Concerned Kiwi, to Greg Foran, CEO of Air NZ:
CEO – Air NZ
As a long-term frequent customer of Air NZ I am shocked and appalled by Air NZ’s consideration of bringing in a so called ‘Health Passport’ linked to the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, as will a very significant percentage of the NZ population. This action would in fact be, according to the 1947 Nuremberg Code, a crime against humanity. As such, I will no longer be using Air NZ and will be encouraging others to take a similar stance. There will no doubt be very large numbers of Kiwis and international customers also taking this position with Air NZ as polls have indicated that more than one third of Kiwis do not wish to take the experimental COVID-19 vaccine, at least until it has been properly long term tested and proven to be safe and effective in the long term.
This is absolutely not a position of being ‘anti vax’. It is simply a position of being pro vaccines so long as they have been properly scientifically tested over the required period of time, to be appropriately safe and effective. The position that Air NZ is considering taking on this issue is a gross breach of the NZ Bill of Rights even if the COVID-19 vaccine had gone through thorough long term scientific testing and been shown to be safe and effective. However, due to all COVID-19 vaccines currently being in an experimental phase (as officially admitted), the proposed position of Air NZ is a clear breach of the 1947 Nuremberg Code (see enclosed extract from the Nuremberg Code below). The breach of the Nuremberg Code comes under the section relating to being forced or coerced/pressured to take experimental medical procedures through having basic liberties (to travel) being removed if people refuse those experimental medical procedures.
By taking this position of a ‘Health Passport’, Air NZ will not only be sure to lose a huge amount of business, but they will also surely have a deluge of high level legal action coming their way on many different fronts. Pfizer, and every other COVID-19 vaccine producer in the world, have refused to make themselves legally liable for any injury or death resulting from their experimental COVID-19 vaccine. That is very understandable due to the vaccines being in such an experimental state and thousands of health injuries and deaths already recorded around the world, according to official figures from the World Health Organisation. Will Air NZ therefore be picking up this legal liability if it forces its customers to take this experimental medical procedure in order to travel on Air NZ? I am quite sure they will not. However, due to the 1947 Nuremberg Code, Air NZ will be making themselves open to high level criminal action if they enforce this policy and some people in NZ subsequently have health injuries or death as a reaction to the experimental vaccine.
If someone takes the experimental vaccine in order to be able to travel on Air NZ, and they subsequently die or have a serious health injury from a reaction to the experimental vaccine, as thousands already have around the world, will Air NZ be held criminally liable for that person’s death or health injury under the 1947 Nuremberg Code? The Nuremberg Code makes this situation of ‘coercion’ very clear, and you can be sure that major legal actions will be taken under such circumstances, and that Air NZ will be forced to legally defend themselves on these potential situations.
Not only is Air NZ putting themselves at huge business risk and legal risk with this proposed Health Passport, they would be actively pushing the emergence a truly appalling situation of what can only be described as ‘medical apartheid’. NZ polls indicate that a huge number of Kiwis have similar feelings on this.
Air NZ needs to be very careful what it stands for on this issue. I would love to be able to continue as a loyal customer of a company that chose to do the right thing on this issue according to medical science and according to basic human rights.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL No 7070 Volume 313: Page 1448,
7 December 1996.
The judgment by the war crimes tribunal at Nuremberg laid down 10 standards to which physicians must conform when carrying out experiments on human subjects in a new code that is now accepted worldwide.
This judgment established a new standard of ethical medical behavior for the post World War II human rights era. Amongst other requirements, this document enunciates the requirement of voluntary informed consent of the human subject. The principle of voluntary informed consent protects the right of the individual to control his own body.
This code also recognizes that the risk must be weighed against the expected benefit, and that unnecessary pain and suffering must be avoided.
This code recognizes that doctors should avoid actions that injure human patients.
The principles established by this code for medical practice now have been extended into general codes of medical ethics.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
Permissible Medical Experiments
The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of human experimentation justify their views on the basis that such experiments yield results for the good of society that are unprocurable by other methods or means of study. All agree, however, that certain basic principles must be observed in order to satisfy moral, ethical and legal concepts:
- The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment.
Photo: Wikipedia: By G B_NZ – Air NZ 787 ZK-NZI at AKL, CC BY-SA 2.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=57983259
A very useful page for you here as you consider the pros and cons. Fifty five point five thousand members to this page. Endless scrolling of feedback from those who have taken the jab, or from relatives & friends of those who did & did not survive to tell the tale.
Screenshots added of just a few to get you started:
Dr Mike Yeadon, former CSO and VP, Allergy and Respiratory Research Head with Pfizer Global R&D and co-Founder of Ziarco Pharma Ltd, talks about his grave concerns about the Coronavirus jab. Listen to him interview with James Delingpole. A good follow up is a commentary by David Icke. He provides & speaks to a transcript of Dr Yeadon’s interview, calling out the MDs & other health professionals complicit in this. He also speaks to our need to resist.
“Rules for a Covid Economy: Rule 01 Do Not Become Hysterical examines the days of crisis in late March 2020 during which the New Zealand Prime Minister, Jacinda Ardern, misled the country with an unconscionable truth-claim of mass death, acted unlawfully with members of her executive by requiring New Zealanders “to stay at home and in their ‘bubbles’” when no such requirement was prescribed by law, and needlessly plunged the country into a socioeconomic maelstrom without even so much as a cost-benefit analysis and social impact assessment.”
By John Bevan-Smith (Author) available on Amazon, published in October 2020 about NZ and the CV lockdown. Note it is available in Kindle download as well as hard copy….
You can read more on the contents at Amazon:
Upon reading this headline my first thought was that the government is accepting liability for damages regarding vaccines. Then of course, we know they have granted indemnity to the vaccine corporations for any adverse events. So why would they be accepting liability? Upon reading the article it becomes clear that they are accepting the responsibility (would be the better word) for the roll out of the covid vaccine in the Pacific. The military will apparently be required for such a large operation. Personally I am averse to the use of military in this respect and it reminds me of recent and disturbing news that elderly care home residents in Germany were force vaccinated with soldiers in uniform standing by (legal investigations pending). The presence of military in uniform can be very intimidating, even if the intent is benign.
Draw your own conclusions. This is from newsroom.co.nz
“Delivering and administering the Pfizer vaccine to remote atolls could require a full-scale Air Force operation, prompting a search for lower-risk solutions
New Zealand is expected to take on legal and financial liability for the potentially fraught roll-out of Covid-19 vaccines in Cook Islands and any other Pacific nations it assists.
Elana provides an excellent overview of what is happening right now on planet earth. So much is packed into this interview it is a must watch. Her extensive knowledge on the geoengineering program, the military, science, the current event we are watching play out globally. See how it all interlocks. Read more detail below … and watch/listen at the link …
Elana Freeland is a writer, ghostwriter, speaker, storyteller, and teacher who researches and writes on Deep State issues, including the stories of survivors of MK-ULTRA, ritual abuse, and invasive electromagnetic weapons (Nexus, October 2014).
She is best known for Chemtrails, HAARP, and the Full Spectrum Dominance of Planet Earth(Feral House, June 2014) and Under An Ionized Sky: From Chemtrails to Space Fence Lockdown (Feral House, February 2018). As a teenager in August 1963, Elana Freeland represented her state at Girls Nation in Washington, DC, and stood in the Rose Garden with President John F. Kennedy. Back in her home state, she gave speeches to civic groups about her moment in the sun with the President. After his public murder in Dallas, she was invited back by the same civic groups to speak in rooms filled with sobbing Americans. Having come of age in the eye of the Sixties maelstrom, Elana wrote 4-book fictional format series Sub Rosa America: A Deep State History about the hidden history of America since President Kennedy’s televised assassination. Most recently, she wrote the story “What Would Solon Have Done?” for the 2017 book If I Were King: Advice for President Trump, edited by Harry Blazer with an Introduction by Catherine Austin Fitts. Freeland’sundergraduate degree was in creative writing with a second major in biology. Her Master of Arts degree from St. John’s College in Santa Fe, New Mexico concentrated on historiography. She lives in Olympia, Washington. Her website: https://www.elanafreeland.com/ Find her books at Amazon
Thanks to Hilary Butler for this observation, posted at her Facebook page. She’s drawn attention to a post by Richie Allen at a link below:
I’ve certainly been noticing, like others I know, the hypocrisy of our esteemed professionals when it comes to the alarming number of deaths and injuries, anything from 15 minutes to several days after the new injection, all being classified as coincidence. Question them & repeatedly comes the statement: ‘no proof’. No proof that is that the injection caused the said adverse reaction. No there is no proof, but how (il)logical is that? Even if we did accept it, then what of the precautionary principle? Wouldn’t the MDs whose oath was ‘to do no harm’, wouldn’t they hold off jabbing until further trials were done? Nowhere do I see these professionals racing to determine the cause of the thousands of adverse reactions (that just happen to follow the said injection). How (un)professional is this? EWR
Read the article by Richie Allen at the following link:
LISTEN at THE LINK:
RE PFIZER VACCINE “COMIRNATY” RE BREACHES OF MEDICINES ACT, MISLEADING AND DECEPTIVE CLAIMS and OTHER MATTERS
I represent a large number of New Zealanders who are extremely concerned about apparent legal breaches and misleading and deceptive representations in the provisional approval, promotion, marketing and roll out of the novel Pfizer mRNA and nanogel vaccine known as “Comirnaty” (“the Pfizer injection”).
READ MORE: https://www.outdoorsparty.co.nz/sue-grey-open-letter-to-prime-minister/?fbclid=IwAR1Xtb6UcDYnAPvhy90a0wNARN1wxxqDhCwebi03eo95CTLW7VNVFLpxr8I
RESPONSE BELOW FROM GOVT CHIEF LEGAL ADVISOR: