Category Archives: Climate Change

In 1967 the Australian Govt approved weather modification & the records on that are missing reports an Australian lawyer

In the video below (that relates also to other matters concerning whistleblowing NSW Police & covid-19), Australian Lawyer Peter Little calls out the government on their approval of weather modification technology (rain making by cloud seeding) … and the disappearance of the records pertaining to the Act (Rain-Making Control Act 1967). Peter mentions the Act in the first two minutes of the video, then expands further when speaking with Melbourne Police to register his complaint.

Note: remember this post about the bush fires earlier in 2020?

Australia is 1 of 47 countries globally that makes rain by cloud seeding (BBC) … why are they not using it to extinguish the fires?

EWR

View the video at Bitchute (to play, hover mouse over bottom left hand corner of video screen and the red play button will appear, press play):

Peter Little Live at Police Headquarters at 313 Spencer Street Melbourne Australia

MY EMAIL: glittle@fightpharmacorruption.com
MY MOBILE +61434178638

Reporting THEFT of Rain-making Control Act 1967 archives

The Rain-Making Control Act 1967 https://www.legislation.vic.gov.au/…/rain-making…/016

Emeritus Prof of Environmental Science: “UN ‘Climate Finance’ Is Subsidy for Kleptocracy”

From thenewamerican.com

PARIS — The international wealth-redistribution schemes of the United Nations, justified under the guise of battling alleged man-made global warming, are really a massive subsidy to kleptocrats ruling poor countries paid for by the poor and middle classes of wealthier and freer nations, according to internationally renowned physicist Dr. Fred Singer.

On top of that, the professor emeritus of environmental sciences at the University of Virginia said, the burden of proof in attributing climate changes to human activities is on man-made global-warming theorists seeking to regulate and control carbon dioxide, and not on skeptics. And so far, the alarmists have failed to demonstrate that mankind is responsible for any measurable impact on the climate, he said.

READ MORE

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22402-top-scientist-un-climate-finance-is-subsidy-for-kleptocracy?fbclid=IwAR27VkjEhdATOZRCOWsuyqOxIrWXWrkhXULU2DYyYYxfjoZo0zljWcFGNiI

 

Photo: screenshot newamerican.com video

 

 

 

Climate change & the HIDDEN agenda: a professional environmentalist now resident in NZ shares insights from 30 yrs work with (EU) Govt & related orgs world wide

Thanks to thecontrail.com for this information …

“Video presentation below by former EU Climate Change proponent Christopher Le Breton.  This was presented in Dunedin several weeks ago.

A fresh look at Climate Change and it’s hidden agenda. Christopher Le Breton, a professional environmentalist who has lived, worked and traveled in 107 countries, shares his insights acquired after three decades of working with Government (EU) and not for profit organisations worldwide.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2xbafwpfJb4

Christopher was previously working at high level in Brussels with the EU in helping to cement the global climate change narrative until he realized the truth and the true agenda.  He has now given away that career, based himself in Dunedin, and is dedicating himself to raising awareness of the truth about the real climate change agenda, geoengineering, HAARP, and eco-terrorism.

Great to see someone like Christopher, with his background, now stepping away and taking on a mission like this.  Very brave move. Christopher was invited to speak at Waitangi Day where he was able to speak for 15 minutes about the climate change deception and geo-engineering where he received an open and positive response. He is now working on raising funds so that he can take his presentation on tour in NZ.

A fresh look at Climate Change and it’s hidden agenda. Christopher Le Breton, a professional environmentalist who has lived, worked and traveled in 107 countries, shares his insights acquired after three decades of working with Government (EU) and not for profit organisations worldwide.
HAARP VIDEO – Weather as a weapon.
https://youtu.be/S2icT8N5CN4


 

Climate change hoax COLLAPSES as new science finds human activity has virtually zero impact on global temperatures

See also our climate pages for further info on the climate change scam that is being used to create panic & usher in the new world order global governance carry on aka Agenda 21/30 (check out the sub pages also at those links). EWR

(Natural News) The climate change hoax has collapsed. A devastating series of research papers has just been published, revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines, airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact on the temperature of the planet.

Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”

The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes in global temperature, the researchers explain.

As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:

Chart-Low-Cloud-Cover-600

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2019-07-12-climate-change-hoax-collapses-new-science-cloud-cover.html

Putin on Greta Thunberg’s speech to UN …”When somebody uses children and teenagers in their own interests it deserves to be condemned”

524K subscribers
Russian President Vladimir Putin says he doesn’t “share everyone’s enthusiasm about Greta Thunberg’s speech” at the UN.

“…Vladimir Putin says he does not “share everyone’s enthusiasm” about Greta Thunberg…” Vladmir Putin

https://wattsupwit

by Eric Worrall

h/t Breitbart; President Vladimir Putin has dismissed Greta Thunberg’s climate crusade, suggesting she has no idea of the cost of what she is demanding.

“I may disappoint you but I do not share everyone’s enthusiasm about Greta Thunberg’s speech [to the UN]. You know, the fact that young people, teenagers pay attention to the acute problems of the modern world, including ecology. That is right and very good. We need to support them. But when somebody uses children and teenagers in their own interests it deserves to be condemned.

hthat.com/2019/10/04/putin-dismisses-climate-messiah-greta-thunberg-poorly-informed-teenager/

The great sea level humbug: Dr Nils-Axel Mörner

The Mind Renewed

Published on Dec 9, 2013

MP3 & SHOW NOTES: http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/… According to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPPC), Global Sea Level is rising at an alarming rate, threatening millions who live in coastal regions and islands around the world, thanks to the global-warming activities of human beings on planet Earth. To challenge these claims, we are joined by Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner, former Expert Reviewer for the IPCC, and erstwhile Head of Paleogeophysics & Geodynamics at the University of Stockholm in Sweden, whose research into sea levels around the globe paints a very different picture.

Source: http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/…

Interview Notes: http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/…

Disclaimer: The views expressed by Dr. Mörner in this interview are his responsibility alone; they do not necessarily reflect those of The Mind Renewed.

Photo:Image by ArtTower from Pixabay

Greta … climate change is a $1.5 trillion industry & those scary predictions come from computer simulations

Friends of Science

Published on Jan 5, 2019

Greta Thunberg of the school #ClimateStrike fame made a compelling, if somewhat dystopian, presentation at COP24. Michelle Stirling, Communications Manager of Friends of Science Society challenges Greta’s perspective in this video response.


If you’re new to the idea that the climate change narrative is not what we are being told … please visit our climate pages at the main menu. And please don’t shoot the messenger. EWR

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Global Warming – Settled Science? alarmists overlook a few inconvenient truths

The hoax of the man-made Global Warming is being imposed on the world by many methods, both subtle and blatant. Proponents of the Global Green Agenda have embarked on a programme of mass deception, while scientists who attempt to blow the whistle on the fraud are silenced, tarred, ridiculed and fired. The Gaian cult that has permeated the United Nations is using the hysteria of Global Warming to impose draconian control measures on society and centralise world power.

from green-agenda.com

Humanity is sitting on a time bomb. If the vast majority of the
world’s scientists are right, we have just ten years to avert a
major catastrophe that could send our entire planet’s climate system
into a tail-spin of epic destruction involving extreme weather, floods,
droughts, epidemics and killer heat waves beyond anything we have
ever experienced – a catastrophe of our own making.

Al Gore,
An Inconvenient Truth

With the continual bombardment of ‘climate doom’ stories today, it is hard to imagine a time when global warming was not a ‘top priority’ on the social, political and economic agenda. Everything from floods in England to poverty in the Third World is now being blamed on global warming. However, it is a relatively new phenomenon, barely discussed until 20 years ago, and established as a significant policy issue only in the past 15 or so years.

Usually a scientific theory takes many decades to become established, and only after the most rigorous testing under many different scenarios, does it achieve ‘scientific consensus’. However, when it comes to Global Warming its proponents claim that there is no argument or debate to be had. Their current crusade is to turn Global Warming into something that supposedly no honest and decent person can disagree about, as they have already done with ‘environmental sustainability’. Al Gore often says “Climate change is a moral issue.” In other words it is all about you, and your destructive behaviour.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has confidently announced ‘the science is settled’ on man-made Global Warming. Their most recent set of reports declares that “the debate over the science of climate change is well and truly over. Unified international political commitment is now urgently required to take action to avoid dangerous climate change.

However, the science is not settled. Many renowned climatologists strongly disagree with the IPCC’s conclusions about the cause and potential magnitude of Global Warming. More than 20,000 scientists have now signed the Oregon Petition which criticises it as ‘flawed’ research and states that “any human contribution to climate change has not yet been demonstrated.” Dr Chris Landsea resigned from the IPCC because he “personally could not in good faith continue to contribute to a process that I view as both being motivated by pre-conceived agendas and being scientifically unsound.”

The IPCC claims that more than 2,500 respected scientists and policy makers collaborate to write its climate change assessments but less than a tenth of these ‘experts’ actually hold qualifications in climatology, most were in fact educated in the political and social sciences. The panel that edits and approves the reports are appointed by the United Nations, and more than half are actually UN officials. Dr Richard Lindzen, who is a genuine climate expert, resigned from the IPCC process after his contributions were completely rewritten by the panel.

It’s not 2,500 people offering their consensus, I participated in that. Each person who is an author writes one or two pages in conjunction with someone else. They travel around the world several times a year for several years to write it and the summary for policymakers has the input of a handful of scientists, but ultimately, it is written by representatives of governments, and of environmental organizations, each pushing their own agenda.” – MIT’s Professor of Atmospheric Science Dr. Richard Lindzen on the IPCC report.

Czech President Klaus stated “It is not fair to refer to the UN panel as a group of scientists. The IPCC is not a scientific institution. It’s a political body, a sort of non-government organization of green flavour. It’s neither a forum of neutral scientists nor a balanced group of scientists. These people are politicized scientists, and UN bureaucrats, who arrive there with a one-sided opinion and a one-sided assignment.”

Asserting ‘the science is settled’ ignores the debate that still rages, and the constant shrieking by alarmists like Al Gore reveals that Global Warming is being used to push a hidden agenda. They are not really interested in the science at all. Even their much vaunted consensus is a myth. The Global Warming Petition Project has been signed by more than 31,000 American scientists, including more than 9,000 with PhDs. Signers include world renowned physicists such as Prof. Edward Teller and Prof. Freeman Dyson. Nearly 4,000 signers are scientists trained in specialties directly related to the physical environment of the Earth and the past and current phenomena that affect that environment.

The petition states: “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gasses is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate. Moreover, there is substantial scientific evidence that increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide produce many beneficial effects upon the natural plant and animal environments of the Earth.”

Proclaiming that “climate change is real” is a nonsensical statement and ignores the Earth’s continual natural warming and cooling cycles. Vikings settled in Greenland and raised crops and cattle 1000 years ago, while Britons grew grapes in England. Four hundred years later, Greenland froze and the Vikings starved. Europe was gripped in a Little Ice Age. The Thames froze all the way up to London. Another surge in temperatures saw widespread global droughts in the mid-1600s. Temperatures plunged again around 1700’s. The globe warmed in 1800-1940, cooled for the next 35 years, then warmed again. The 1940-1975 cooling period occurred despite the fact that industrial production and release of CO2 vastly accelerated during this time. This led to political and media scaremongering about Global Cooling, and the threat of a new ice age.

Again, this arose out of a misunderstanding of long term temperature fluctuations. Scientists have discovered that the sun not only has a regular 11 year cycle of sunspot activity. They have now discovered a significant 200 year cycle. Sunspot and solar radiation activity almost exactly parallel temperature changes on the Earth. It correlates well with the anomalous post-war temperature dip, when global carbon dioxide levels were rising very fast. The increase in solar radiation prevents the formation of clouds, which have a cooling effect on the planet, therefore the temperature rises.

Other recent studies, published in Nature and other leading journals, conclude that the sun’s radiant heat and solar radiation levels affect planetary warming and cloud formation more strongly than acknowledged by Global Warming alarmists. After all, why would natural forces that caused the climate to change in past centuries suddenly stop now? And how does man-made Global Warming explain why every planet in our solar system appears to be simultaneously warming up? Does this not suggest that Global Warming is a natural cycle as a result of the dynamic nature of the sun?

READ MORE

http://green-agenda.com/science.html

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

Climate change lies exposed

 

Alan Jones and Peta Credlin expose the lies being promoted by the by the IPCC. Former IPCC Chair for the Sea Level committee Dr. Nils-Axel Mörner opens up too Alan Jones and completely spills the beans on how the world is being lied to by the UN and the climate change activists. Solar activity is currently the key contributor to any climate variation. Copyright © Jones & Co, SkyNews, 2GB

The history of global warming scares and fabrication of climate alarm – Sen Malcolm Roberts Australia

Published on Sep 25, 2011

Carbon Tax Corruption Scandal; Part 1 – series Introduction by the Galileo Movement. Join volunteer Malcolm Roberts and the Galileo Movement for this first in a series of videos that explain the deliberate manipulation and misrepresentation of science that is the basis of the government’s carbon tax. In this video: understand the scope of this series and how people really care; the difference between pollution and global warming; The Galileo Movement’s founding and purpose; the need to base our care on informed facts; the humanitarian danger of taking action without being accurately informed. The annotated script with links is available here: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… Suggest watching Part 2: Rogues Gallery http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCPWKI… For more information and to see the source of our facts please visit our research site – http://www.galileomovement.com.au Especially Section 6. ‘Political Scam Exposed’ here: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/pol… Basic facts on carbon dioxide, pages 1 & 2 here: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… Summary of the corruption of climate science: http://www.galileomovement.com.au/doc… For Malcolm Roberts’ short report on CSIRO and detailed appendices on many topics uncovered in the report: http://www.conscious.com.au/CSIROh!.html

Climate Hoax Aimed at New World Order, Says Aussie PM Advisor

From thenewamerican.com dated 2015, timely given the current ‘address climate change’ emphasis at the Davos Economic Forum where Jacinda is showcasing her ‘wellbeing budget’ (aint that humorous with 43+K homeless since Key landbanked/sold off our state houses to property developers & third highest child poverty in the developed world … among many other negative stats belonging to the hall of shame) … We’ve posted this advisor’s insights previously actually. Another good article here exposing the scam that Al Gore’s theories are. Research it for yourself … they’re full of holes. (There’s a few articles on our climate page). Any climate change (the new term for global warming) we’re seeing today is surely the result of the extensive climate modification that’s been going on for many decades, denied but all well documented, and now being proposed by the likes of David Keith (of ‘free riding on our grandkids’ infamy) as a great method for cooling the planet.  One last thought …

“The threat of environmental crisis will be the ‘international disaster key’ that will unlock the New World Order.”

| Mikhail Gorbachev

General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union/ First Secretary.: 1985~1991. Quoted in “A Special Report: “The Wildlands Project”

Read the article below.

Climate Hoax Aimed at New World Order, Says Aussie PM Advisor

The United Nations climate czar and various alarmist media outlets this week sought to dismiss as a “joke” recent comments by a top advisor to Australian leader Tony Abbott on fraudulent man-made global warming theories being used to advance global tyranny. In an explosive column, Maurice Newman, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council, argued that theories on alleged human-caused climate change were not only bogus, but are serving as the basis for imposing a totalitarian “new world order” on humanity. Despite the uproar among global-warming theorists, UN bureaucrats, and the alarmist press, the evidence suggests Newman is correct.

In the column, published May 8 by The Australian newspaper, Newman begins by blowing the lid off a “well-kept secret” — the climate models purporting to prove that man’s practically irrelevant emissions of carbon dioxide are responsible for catastrophic global warming have been proven wrong. But that is not surprising, he wrote. “We have been subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years,” he explained, citing an array of examples of climate fear-mongers and media outlets warning of global cooling and other problems just a few decades ago. The more recent pronouncements of the alarmists are equally ludicrous.

In Australia, prophets of climate doom and gloom have been similarly exposed as quacks, he explained, pointing to a 2005 prediction based on computer models that could not have been more wrong. “We’ve swallowed dud prediction after dud prediction,” Newman observed. “What’s more, the [UN] Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which we were instructed was the gold standard on global warming, has been exposed repeatedly for misrepresentation and shoddy methods.” He also blasted the manipulation of temperature data to suit the alarmist narrative, and NASA’s now-exposed untruths from earlier this year.

If the theories, warnings, and models have been exposed as frauds, Newman wonders rhetorically why the UN would insist on spending hundreds of billions of dollars on “futile climate chance policies.” The answer has already been provided by, among others, UN Foundation boss Timothy Wirth, who declared: “Even if the (climate change) theory is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.” UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) boss Christiana Figueres has also explained it all rather bluntly.

For instance, speaking in Brussels last February, Figueres declared: “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.” More recently, blasting the United States and Americans’ elected representatives for not bowing down, Figueres claimed the ruthless Communist Chinese regime represented the best political model for fighting global warming.

“In other words, the real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook,” Newman explained, echoing the concerns of countless scientists and experts around the world. “This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the UN. It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective…. Make no mistake, climate change is a must-win battlefield for authoritarians and fellow travelers.”

Newman noted that, having gained so much ground, the “eco-catastrophists” have no intention of giving up. In fact, at this point, they are backed into a corner, and to admit being wrong would be catastrophic for the establishment’s credibility — not to mention its dreams of a planetary “climate” regime with carbon taxes, wealth redistribution, and more. The totalitarian alarmists have already captured the UN and are “extremely well-funded,” as Newman put it and as a U.S. Senate investigation revealed. They also have a powerful ally in the White House and armies of “compliant academics” and “gullible mainstream media” outlets to push the climate tales regardless of the evidence. They have bribe money extracted from Western taxpayers and promised to UN member regimes for submission to the agenda, too.

But the consequences for humanity will be devastating, with former NASA climatologist Dr. Roy Spencer, for example, warning that the policies pushed by the “global warming Nazis” literally threaten millions of lives. Newman, meanwhile, noted that the “anti-growth policy prescriptions will needlessly prolong poverty, hunger, sickness and illiteracy for the world’s poorest.” The UN’s agenda also threatens free markets, prosperity, liberty, national sovereignty, and more, as The New American has documented extensively.

Despite those very real threats, under the guise of fighting the manufactured threat of man-made global warming catastrophe, Newman said there is a “real chance” that UN climate boss Figueres and “those who share her centralized power ambitions will succeed.” “As the UN’s December climate change conference in Paris approaches, Australia will be pressed to sign even more futile job-destroying climate change treaties,” he continued. “Resisting will be politically difficult. But resist we should. We are already paying an unnecessary social and economic price for empty gestures. Enough is enough.”

Figueres, who opened a recent UN climate summit with a prayer to the Mayan goddess of cannibalism, human sacrifice, and war, dismissed Newman’s concerns as “an attempt at humor.” “I really don’t take it very seriously because it doesn’t respond to the reality or to facts,” she claimed, conveniently ignoring all of the facts presented in Newman’s column. “We live in a world of free press and free opinion and, you know, if that’s the humor in Australia then that’s the humor in Australia … I have my own sense of humor. It’s quite fine.”

Of course, there is nothing funny about foisting a devastating global “climate” regime on humanitybased on discredited computer models.” But for Figueres to address the facts — she said Newman’s comments were “really good fun” — would be to expose the entire UN “climate” agenda as a dangerous attack on humanity, and especially the poor, based on fraudulent “science.” Various Australian politicians also joined the bandwagon attacking Newman’s reputation, but without addressing any of the points he raised.

For years, The New American has also been exposing the UN’s pseudo-science as fraudulent. Top experts from around the world have ridiculed the UN’s “climate models” as embarrassingly wrong— they cannot even accurately model the past, much less the future. Every single UN climate model predicted warming, and yet, for more than 18 years, there has been none. This magazine has also been sounding the alarm about the totalitarian so-called solutions being promoted by global-warming theorists — outlandish attacks on liberty, the poor, national sovereignty, and even mankind itself.

In Australia, at least, voters appear to be catching on, giving a landslide victory to Abbott and his party, which campaigned on killing the carbon tax and reining in global-warming alarmism. In one of the government’s first moves in power, the ruling Conservatives delivered a blunt message to UN alarmists: No more “socialism masquerading as environmentalism.” In a policy paper, Abbott’s Conservatives also publicly refused to sign up for any new contributions, taxes, or charges at the UN global warming summit then underway. In the United States, meanwhile, polls show just 40 percent of Americans agree with the man-made global warming theory.

However, as Newman explained in his column, the UN and the establishment plan to push the climate hysteria hard in the coming months. With the crucial UN global-warming summit in Paris coming up later this year, globalists and alarmists understand that this may be their last chance to successfully shackle humanity to their UN-run “climate” regime. And with the theory imploding on the world stage and the establishment’s credibility on the line — along with its grandiose vision of carbon taxes and “global governance” to fight “global warming” — the attacks on skeptics will become more vicious and deranged. Humanity must stand firm.

Alex Newman is a correspondent for The New American, covering economics, education, politics, and more. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at: anewman@thenewamerican.com

Related articles:

Australia Rejects UN “Socialism Masquerading as Environmentalism”

Climate Scientist: “Global Warming Nazis” Threaten Humanity

UN Climate Boss Resigns in Scandal, Says Mission Is “Religion”

Embarrassing Predictions Haunt the Global-Warming Industry

Top Scientists Slam and Ridicule UN IPCC Climate Report

Global-warming Alarmism Dying a Slow Death

UN Carbon Regime Would Devastate Humanity

Climate Alarmists Push Chinese Communism, Population Control 

Australia Reining in Climate Schemes After Voters Reject Carbon Tax 

“Climate Science” in Shambles: Real Scientists Battle UN Agenda

SOURCE:

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/20858-climate-hoax-aimed-at-new-world-order-says-aussie-pm-advisor

Climate change is a ‘UN-led ruse to establish new world order’ – Maurice Newman adviser to Australian PM (2015)

Climate change is a hoax developed as part of a secret plot by the United Nations to undermine democracies and takeover the world, a top adviser to Tony Abbott, Australia’s prime minister, has warned.

Maurice Newman, the chief business adviser to the prime minister, said the science showing links between human activity and the warming climate was wrong but was being used as a “hook” by the UN to expand its global control.

“This is not about facts or logic. It’s about a new world order under the control of the UN,” he wrote in The Australian.

“It is opposed to capitalism and freedom and has made environmental catastrophism a household topic to achieve its objective.” Born in Ilford, England, and educated in Australia, Mr Newman, a staunch conservative and former chairman of the Australian Stock Exchange, has long been an outspoken critic of climate change science.

He was appointed chairman of the government’s business advisory council by Mr Abbott, who himself is something of a climate change sceptic and once famously described climate change as “absolute cr**” – a comment he later recanted.

In his comment piece – described by critics as “whacko” – Mr Newman said the world has been “subjected to extravagance from climate catastrophists for close to 50 years”.

“It’s a well-kept secret, but 95 per cent of the climate models we are told prove the link between human CO2 emissions and catastrophic global warming have been found, after nearly two decades of temperature stasis, to be in error,” he wrote.

“The real agenda is concentrated political authority. Global warming is the hook. Eco-catastrophists [ …] have captured the UN and are extremely well funded. They have a hugely powerful ally in the White House.”

Environmental groups and scientists described Mr Newman as a ‘crazed’ conspiracy theorist and some called on him to resign.

“His anti-science, fringe views are indistinguishable from those made by angry trolls on conspiracy theory forums,” said the Climate Change Council.

Professor Will Steffen, a climate change scientist, told The Australian Financial Review: “These are bizarre comments that would be funny if they did not come from [Mr Abbott’s] chief business adviser.” Mr Abbott’s office did not respond but his environment minister said he did not agree with Mr Newman’s comments.

The article was written by Mr Newman to coincide with a visit by Christiana Figueres, the UN climate change negotiation, who has urged Australia to reduce its reliance on coal. Australia is one of the world’s biggest emitters of carbon emissions per capita.

Since his election in 2013, Mr Abbott has abolished Labor’s carbon tax, scaled back renewable energy targets and appointed sceptics to several significant government positions.

SOURCE

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/11591193/Australia-PM-advisor-says-climate-change-a-UN-led-ruse.html

Header image: Maurice Newman, chairman of the Prime Minister’s Business Advisory Council Photo: AP

Uh oh, top NASA scientist claimed in 2008 that all ice would vanish from the Arctic by summer 2018 – how could the godfather of ‘global warming’ get it so wrong?

From Natural News … intriguing isn’t it people? More porkies from our ‘esteemed’ leaders.

(Natural News) Climate alarmists are everywhere — but real science continues to show that these scaremongers are the ones full of hot air. Back in 2008, a top “climate prophet” from NASA predicted that the Arctic would be free of sea ice by summer 2018. But data from 2017 has shown quite the opposite: Ice mass in the Arctic has been growing — not disappearing, much to the chagrin of climate change propagandists everywhere, no doubt.

In June 2008, James Hansen — then-director of the Goddard Institute of Space Sciences— reportedly told the Associated Press, “This is our last chance.”

Hansen is also known as the “godfather of global warming science” (but perhaps global warming mythology would be more fitting). Before Congress, Hansen further declared that we had long passed the “dangerous level” of greenhouse gasses. Ultimately, the NASA expert concluded that within 5 to 10 years, the Arctic would be “free of sea ice in the summer.”

Despite the fears of major ice melts being propagated by Hansen and other proponents of climate change propaganda, the truth is that sea ice mass in the great north has been increasing. How is it that Hansen, the “godfather” of global warming could have gotten it so wrong?

Whatever the reason, over the last decade reports have continuously shown that sea ice mass is not under siege — though that is what the alarmists want you to believe. In September 2017, shocking data from Greenland showed that sea ice mass had increased by a staggering 40 percent since 2012.

But that’s not all: As Natural News writer Tracey Watson revealed, sea ice mass has been trending upwards for years. Reports from different agencies in 2015, 2014 and 2013 all showed similar trends: Arctic ice mass was increasing by leaps and bounds — not melting away into nothing as the propagandists promised.

READ MORE

https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-04-07-top-nasa-scientist-claimed-all-ice-will-vanish-from-the-arctic-by-this-summer.html

Sea levels are FALLING not rising, SERIOUSLY – from NASA’s own data

Thanks to thecontrail.com for this link

These data, of course, clearly contradict the false narrative of rapid, never-ending rising ocean levels that flood continents and drown cities — a key element of the climate change “boogeyman” fiction that’s used to scare gullible youth into making Al Gore rich.

(Natural News) As the global warming narrative unravels under revelations of scientific fraud, data alteration and faked “hockey stick” data models, the fake news media remains suspiciously silent over the fact that NASA now confirms ocean levels have been falling for nearly two years.

On a NASA page intended to spread climate alarmism (https://climate.nasa.gov/vital-signs/sea-level/), NASA’s own data reveal that world-wide ocean levels have been falling for nearly two years, dropping from a variation of roughly 87.5mm to below 85mm.

These data, of course, clearly contradict the false narrative of rapid, never-ending rising ocean levels that flood continents and drown cities — a key element of the climate change “boogeyman” fiction that’s used to scare gullible youth into making Al Gore rich.

Check out the sea level chart for yourself, showing the downward trend across 2016 – 2017:

READ MORE

http://www.naturalnews.com/2017-07-26-nasa-confirms-sea-levels-have-been-falling-across-the-planet-for-two-years-media-silent.html

 

From a Nobel Laureate in Physics: “Global Warming is Pseudoscience”

Published on Dec 17, 2015

Professor Ivar Giaever, the 1973 Nobel Prizewinner for Physics trashes the global warming/climate change/extreme weather pseudoscientific clap-trap and tells Obama he is “Dead Wrong”.
This was the 2012 meeting of Nobel Laureates.
The 2015 speech by Prof Giaever is here;
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_U…


See our Climate pages for further evidence (main menu) and hear others who speak in a similar vein to this man. There is a petition going in fact, signed by thousands of scientists who also disagree with the Climate scam. People aren’t arguing the weather’s not changed … but if you have studied the practice of geoengineering, you’ll know that the weather is being manipulated. And has been for many decades. All documented and patented as well.

EnvirowatchRangitikei

 

PHOTO credit: with thanks Pixabay

Geoengineering trails observed over Bulls, Marton area in the Rangitikei District NZ – evidence of ongoing weather modification


In May last year (2015) a local person (thank you!) sent me images they’d captured over the Bulls area of skies that were clearly geoengineered. I believe the above video that I captured over Marton in May also is of the same spraying event. To educate yourself on geoengineering or climate modification please visit our Geoengineering page. Listen to the testimonies of whistleblowers, watch the documentaries and read the data by people who have studied this practice that has continued now for several decades right around the planet. For a well referenced documentation of its development go to climateviewer.com‘s timeline. There are further videos recording these trails over the Rangitikei on the NZ Geoengineering page. See also how our air, water and soils are polluted and poisoned by this practice. Although now acknowledged by governments as a scientific practice that ‘may combate global warming’ (they say) – that geoengineering is happening now is currently flatly denied by governments of the world. Below is a list of the contents of independently tested trails in California. New Zealanders are finding high concentrations of Aluminum, Barium and Strontium in their rainwater.

Contents of the trails

“Open air Chemtrail spraying operations are now live in California (all 50 states and all NATO countries). Independent analysis of chemtrail fallout has identified many toxic chemicals including”;

Aluminum Oxide Particles, Arsenic, Bacilli and Molds, Barium Salts, Barium Titanates, Cadmium, Calcium, Chromium, Desiccated Human Red Blood Cells, Ethylene Dibromide, Enterobacter Cloacal, Enterobacteriaceae, Human white Blood Cells-A (restrictor enzyme used in research labs to snip and combine DNA), Lead, Mercury, Methyl Aluminum, Mold Spores, Mycoplasma, Nano-Aluminum-Coated Fiberglass, Nitrogen Trifluoride, Known as CHAFF), Nickel, Polymer Fibers, Pseudomonas Aeruginosa, Pseudomonas Florescens, Radioactive Cesium, Radio Active Thorium, Selenium, Serratia Marcscens, Sharp Titanium Shards, Silver, Streptomyces, Stronthium, Sub-Micron Particles, (Containing Live Biological Matter), Unidentified Bacteria, Uranium, Yellow Fungal Mycotoxins

http://www.stopsprayingcalifornia.com/What_are_they_Spraying.php

Images captured over the Rangitikei District May 2015

IMG_3633

IMG_3634

IMG_3635

IMG_3632

LINKS TO NZ SITES on Geoengineering

http://thecontrail.com
https://chemtrailsnorthnz.wordpress.com/
South Canterbury Sky Watch

Nobel Laureate Smashes the Global Warming Hoax

“…the average temperature of the earth is equal to the emperor’s new clothes…” Here is a Nobel Laureate telling the truth like it is on so called global warming hoax. (Thanks to ecolibertyblog.wordpress.com)

EnvirowatchRangitikei

 

 

 

The Millennial Kiwi

Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever’s speech at the Nobel Laureates meeting 1st July 2015.
Ivar points out the mistakes which Obama makes in his speeches about global warming, and shares other not-well known facts about the state of the climate.

View original post

How the Rothschilds and Monsanto Control Global Climate Engineering

“….when you are involved in climate decimating geoengineering programs, you must also control the “forecast” models to cover your tracks…” Dane Wigington

Educate yourself on geoengineering; our climate has been manipulated (covertly) for decades now. They of course don’t want you to know and continue to deny it. And here we have the most evil corporation on the planet partnering with a name that is responsible for fomenting wars for profits for centuries. What good can come out of that one would have to ask?

EnvirowatchRangitikei

(Photo credit – header image by eatlocalgrown.com)

Growing Awareness of Covert Climate Engineering Exposes Climate-Gate Science

Exposing more and more the climate change scam. Check out EnvirowatchRangitikei’s Climate page for more info on this … see the petition that’s been signed by 31,000 scientists, 9,000 of the PhDs. None of them believe in the claims about global warming promoted by the IPCC.  And if you’re new to climate modification (a covert practice that’s been going on since the 1940s, this is an excellent article to get you up to speed). Plenty of links to do your own research. Check also our Geoengineering page.    EnvirowatchRangitikei


 

Marton NZ, 1 Oct 2014, 9:31 am
1 Oct 2014, 9:31 am

(Above image of geoengineering trails captured over Marton in the Rangitikei in 2015. Note the cross … we are told by the deniers of climate modification that the trails are aircraft flying from A to B as it were … so why, you should ask, do we have a cross here?)

1959 Disney film about weather modification – “weather control will both enrich & safeguard our daily lives”

“In the world of tomorrow weather control will both enrich & safeguard our daily lives. In the foreseeable future we will conquer more than violent storms, we will turn the destructive elements of today into new sources of power, shaping the land on which we live. All mankind will benefit, arid wastelands will be made green and fertile, and vast frozen areas will become productive. To this end man made satellites will probe the secrets of the skies, they will be our eyes in outer space…”

Above are some lofty sounding ideals quoted from the closing seconds of a Disney film produced in 1959.

If you thought weather control was in the realm of conspiracy and tinfoil hats think again. Here it is proposed as beneficial for mankind, unfortunately it has ended up in another realm – that of weaponized weather with chemtrails, defined as an exotic weapons system  in HR2977, Space Preservation Act.

The video is from Mresu Hlamer‘s channel on Youtube. Mention of weather modification methods begins at 7.10.

Interview & article on rising sea levels, ‘the greatest lie ever told’ … Dr Mörner

On first consideration, to those who are convinced by the IPCC science, this comes as blasphemy almost. However, consider the evidence … as I did. As many others have.

You may be surprized to learn that a total of 9,000 PhDs have signed a petition denying that CO2 is causing global warming. There are 31,000 scientists in total who have signed that petition.  In addition, 49 former NASA scientists have  written to NASA endorsing the same …  (read their full letter at the source)

Add to all of this (plus much more evidence from professionals found at this link) …. the findings of Dr Nils-Axel  Mörner who has measured sea levels in person, rather than using computer models … and you may be convinced to read more.

Begin with this article from the Telegraph, by Christopher Booker:

QUOTE:

“If one thing more than any other is used to justify proposals that the world must spend tens of trillions of dollars on combating global warming, it is the belief that we face a disastrous rise in sea levels. The Antarctic and Greenland ice caps will melt, we are told, warming oceans will expand, and the result will be catastrophe….

But if there is one scientist who knows more about sea levels than anyone else in the world it is the Swedish geologist and physicist Nils-Axel Mörner, formerly chairman of the INQUA International Commission on Sea Level Change. And the uncompromising verdict of Dr Mörner, who for 35 years has been using every known scientific method to study sea levels all over the globe, is that all this talk about the sea rising is nothing but a colossal scare story…”

Read the article at the SOURCE: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/5067351/Rise-of-sea-levels-is-the-greatest-lie-ever-told.html

In the following video produced by The Mind Renewed website, you can hear Dr Mörner being interviewed. Read the information at its source and below the video on YouTube.

SOURCE: http://themindrenewed.com/interviews/2013/218-int-18

YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ycq5CJiMer8

Climate Change HOAX exposed by Geologist straight to the UK Govt

Transcript:

Professor Ian Plimer

Geologist & author of ‘Heaven & Earth, Global Warming: The Missing Science’

Professor Plimer, thank you for coming.

I’m a Geologist, and the one thing that we miss out on in looking at climate change is the past. Climates have always changed. Climate changes in the past have been greater and faster than anything we experience in our lifetimes. And sea levels have always changed. Not by the modest couple of millimeters that people are having connections about, but we’ve had in the past sea level changes of only 1500 meters. That’s a sea level change. And if we look back in the history of time, the atmosphere once had a very large amount of carbon dioxide in it. It’s now got less than .04%. Where did that carbon dioxide go to? It went into chalk, limestone, gels and life, and we’ve been sequestering carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere for only 10,500 million years. This planet has been de-gassing carbon dioxide since it first formed on that first Thursday 4,567 thousand million years ago. Carbon dioxide is a natural gas. It has dominated the atmosphere for an extraordinarily long period of time. And we now are at a dangerously low level.  If we halved the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere we would have no terrestrial plants. Carbon dioxide is plant food. It is not a pollutant. To use words like pollution with carbon dioxide is misleading and deceptive. But the past gives us a wonderful story. In the past we’ve had six major ice ages. We are currently in an ice age. It started 34 million years ago when Sth America had the good sense to pull away from Antarctica and there was a circum polar current set up which isolated Antarctica and we started to get the Antartic ice sheet. We’ve had periods of glaciation & interglacials. We are currently in interglacial. And during that 34 million years we have refrigerated the earth. But for less than 20% of time we have had ice on planet earth. The rest of the time it’s been warmer and wetter, and there’s been more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. And what did life do? It thrived. Six of the six great ice ages were initiated when the carbon dioxide content of the atmosphere was higher than now, in fact up to a thousand times higher. So we have from the geological evidence absolutely no evidence that carbon dioxide has driven climate. For some odd reason the major driver of climate is that great ball of heat in the sky which we call the sun. That’s … you heard of heat first, that’s really quite unusual, and we change our distance from the sun. Every hundred thousand years our orbit changes from elliptical to circular. And we have a cycle of 90,000 years of cold & 10,000 years of warm. We’re in one of those warm cycles now. And every 43,000 years the axis of the earth changes a little bit, and every 21,000 years we get a little bit of a wobble. Each of those orbital events puts us further from the sun. Every now and then we get bombarded by cosmic rays, coming from the super nova eruptions somewhere out there, and if the sun’s magnetic field cannot drive these away, we start to form low level clouds. We’ve got extremely good evidence that this process has been going on for a very long period of time. Every now and then continents start to move, and they move at very rapid rates. They move about (holds hands up to measure) 8 inches every year. And at one time a continent can be over a pole and at another time it can be at the equator. Those moving continents change the major heat balance on the earth. And that’s the ocean currents, the oceans carry far more heat than the atmosphere. Every now and then because of major geological processes we get a great bulge on the ocean floor of new volcanic rock. That changes ocean currents. Every year we have 10,000 cubic kilometers of sea water that goes through new volcanic rocks in the ocean floor. That exchanges heat. The reaction between sea water and the rocks stops the oceans becoming acid. When we run out of rocks the oceans will become acid, but don’t wait up, it will be a long time. We see 1500 terrestrial volcanoes on planet earth. We only measure 20 of them. And very few of those measurements are really accurate, but they tell us that a little bit of carbon dioxide leaks out of those volcanoes. But what we don’t hear is that there are at least 3.74 million volcanoes on the sea floor which leak out huge amounts of carbon dioxide. We have got pools of liquid carbon dioxide on the sea floor. So early earth’s carbon dioxide, where did it go? It went into rocks. Where did it come from? It came from rocks. What did it do to the planet? We did not fry and die, we didn’t have runaway greenhouse. Well that’s just geology. That’s not important so let’s look at more modern times we’ve had drill cores that have gone through the ice sheets. Snow when it falls captures some air. That air is then trapped in the ice and we can later extract it from drill core and measure the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. And we can see with our cycles of glaciation  and interglacials that when we finish an interglacial event, then we release carbon dioxide some 800 years later. So, what’s that telling us? It’s telling us that temperature’s driving carbon dioxide, not that carbon dioxide is driving temperature. Oh yes but that’s only hundreds of thousands of years ago. Forget that. Well let’s go to more modern times. We’ve been measuring temperatures accurately since 1850 and the accuracy’s plus or minus one degree Celsius as ancient measurements. We have been told that this point seven degrees Celsius rise is going to create a disaster. I’ve only got to move over to here (steps one step right) and I’ve had a point 7 degrees temperature rise. Where do you people go for your summer holidays? You go to a warmer climate. We like warm climate. If someone from Helsinki moves to Singapore there’s an average temperature rise of 22 degrees Celsius. Singaporians don’t drop dead in the streets from the temperature. So we are creatures of warm climate, and we have been measuring temperature and we have seen a slight warming from 1860 to 1890, then a slight cooling til 1910 then a warming until 1940 so much so that the North West Passage was open. Then a cooling until 1977, and then a warming until the end of the century and now we’re in a period of cooler. So we’ve had these cycles of warming and cooling. Strange that these cycles are actually related to changes in the heat balance in the oceans. So we have these 60 year cycles over a long warming event. We are in a period of global warming. It has been warming since the minimum 330 years ago. These are the times when you had the ice fairs on the Thames. These are the times when the Dutch Masters painted hoar frosts and bitterly cold conditions. That was the time when the sun was a bit inactive & we had no sun spot activity. So we’re in a long period of warming and one of the questions that I ask in this book, which part of the last 330 years of warming is due to human activity? And which part is natural? This is the question that kids should ask their school teachers and they’re deliberately unanswerable questions. Because I am of the view that many children are getting fed environmental propaganda in the schools and are not being given the critical and analytical facilities to be able to dissect the argument. So we’re in a period of warming. What’s the worry? It’s quite normal. And let’s just look at history. The one thing that the climate industry, which it is, ignores, is history. In Roman times, it was warm, it was considerably warmer than now. We know that. They kept good records. They grew olives up the Rhine river as far as Bonne. They had wine grapes in Yorkshire. We know from their clothing that it was warm. Possibly they were going to an orgy but I think it more likely it was warm. And that warming suddenly stopped in 535 AD. And we entered the Dark Ages. And in 535 AD we had Krakatoa filling the atmosphere with aerosols. And it wasn’t a big volcanoe. Only 30 cubic kilometers of aerosols going into the atmosphere. We’ve had bigger ones. Yellowstone. We’ve had even bigger ones in NZ where 10,000 cubic kilometers of aerosols have gone into the atmosphere, and we pray for another one because that’s the only way we’ll ever beat them at Rugby. Wipe them out! We had two volcanoes, one in Rubal and one in Krakatoa in Indonesia in 535, 536. We went into the Dark Ages. It was cool. What happened? Crops failed. We starved. We had civil unrest. We had cannibalism. We broke out of that, into the medieval warming. First afield it was the Vikings. The sea became calmer. They could go further fishing. They actually went to New Finland which they called Vinland. In Greenland, grapes and barley were growing. In Greenland the graves were deep because there was no permafrost. It was a wonderful benign climate. Five degrees warmer than now. Eric the Red was saying ‘come to Greenland, it’s a wonderful climate’ and it was. And then we went through a period of silent inactivity and in 23 years we went from the medieval warming into the little ice age. And that little ice age ended 330 years ago. So what do you think would happen after a little ice age? Would it get colder or do you think it would get warmer? The only reason that the arguments of  science have got any traction in society is that they have been related to the last 30 years or 40 years of temperature measurements. I see with great interest the Met office is telling us  that this is the hottest year on record, but you might be on a different calendar to me  but I don’t think this year’s finished yet and this time last year I was in London as I was the time before the year before and it was miserable, it was cold, it was very cold. So those sort of predictions made just before a climate conference, one has to be very skeptical of. So in science skepticism is not a pejorative word, there is no concensus. In science there are constant battles. A good example, we all knew that we got ulcers from an acid stomach and from stress & we took pills and rubbed our bellies & hoped the ulcers would go away until two scientists who were not following the mainstream, were not following the consensus  were arguing that this was due to a bacteria, and no one listened. Ultimately one of them took the bacterium, developed ulcers, took the antidote, and for that they get a Nobel Prize. You do not get a Nobel Prize for following the consensus or saying the science is settled. I believe we’ve had enormous corruption of science and the scientific method. I believe that the monies that are floating around for climate research, which is a current fad and fashion are quite perverse. I believe we’re putting science backwards. And come the next inevitable pandemic we may not have the weapons to handle it. We might go waving herbs and chanting rather than creating an antidote. So this for me, this climate industry has been a huge attack on the scientific method. It has been an attack on my science, and history and things fortunately are changing. I’ll finish with one last point. You’ve got your climate change Act, we’ve just had a carbon tax in Australia. Nineteen bills went through parliament, and our carbon tax is to lower the emissions of carbon dioxide from our employment generated industries in Australia. And it’s wonderful. We’ve led the world in suicide, and our carbon tax is to knock down our emissions by 5%. Now you can do the sums, and the sums are very simple. The IPCC says that 3% of annual emissions are from humans. Why is it that 3% drives climate change and not the other 97 is beyond me but that’s another matter. Australia puts out 1.5% of the world’s CO2 emissions. You can do the calculations, and by Australia knocking back their emissions by 5% we will by the year 2050 have lowered global temperatures by 0.00007 degrees Celsius. So I do hope you enjoy our sacrifice in giving you a warmer climate here in England. Thank you.

How the Global Warming Scam Began

FULL TRANSCRIPT

I’m John Coleman and the name of this presentation is ‘There is No Significant Global Warming’. And I’m the guy that is just doggone sure of that. Now you may think that I’m just a paid off shill, Big Oil or something of that sort. No, no, no, no … they’ve never given me a nickel. I’m a television weather caster with 60 years experience … a meteorologist. I was the first weather man on Good Morning America, and the man who founded the weather channel, and this is my accomplishment… Broadcast Meteorologist of the Year, from the American Meteorological Society of which I was a professional member for many years. I finally quit the AMS when it became very clear to me that the politics had gotten in the way of the science and it was time to talk about something else. Now did we have a Winter or what in 2013, 14, oh man did we ever? When I called for my brother in Ohio, his wife said he wasn’t coming in from shoveling the snow to talk to some guy in California. How could you talk global warming when it was the coldest, bitterest, snowiest winter in 30 years which it was across the United States, and it would take a lot of gall to put out a statement as our NOAA, National, Oceanic and Atmospheric agency did, claiming that 2013 was the warmest year … I mean it is sheer silliness, it is manipulation of the data. Now look, let’s get something clear right from the beginning. I love this planet earth. I’ve been a citizen of this earth now for darn near 80 years, and it’s all I got. If I thought that we, mankind, were damaging this beautiful little sphere, this blue marble on which we live, I would be terrified, and give every ounce of energy to stop what we were doing. But I have studied the issues of so-called global warming, or now they call it climate change since the warming has stopped. I have studied the issues as carefully & completely as a good scientist can, and reached an absolute firm conclusion that there is no global warming. Now this earth, it’s spinning around the sun at 17,000 miles per hour. It is travelling with the sun, in our little spiral, off the Milky Way Galaxy, at over 100,000 miles an hour, and that galaxy is flying out in the universe, as the big bang continues to expand the universe, and we are all travelling very very fast. What a ride. The earth has been travelling for four and a half billion years, and as best I can tell it’s going to stay just fine for another four billion years, but wait a minute. During that period we have had Ice Ages, and we have had inter-glacial periods, and we’re going to continue to have those natural variations in climate, but man-made climate change? I’m sure it’s not going to happen. That’s why I sent out this Tweet today. This Tweet went out to Al Gore, it went out to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the United Nations, to the Seierra Club, to the Democratic Party National Committee. And what it said is, where is your so called global warming, because if you chart the temperatures, you can go back into the ‘70s and come up to today, and there’s almost no warming, I mean less than one degree warming since 1978, and absolutely no warming since 1998! What kind of deal is that? Well I’ll tell you what kind of deal it is. It’s the kind of deal that’s full of silliness if you’re promoting climate change and global warming. We are in one of the most stable and beautiful periods of earth’s climate you could hope for. And look at the stark contrast between the spaghetti of the many mottles of atmospheric warming created by various people who’ve gotten tens of millions of dollars of federal grant money and worked for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change … and there’s the average of all their models, and then here’s the real temperatures as measured both on earth and with our satellites, and folks, it’s just not happening. That’s why I posted on Facebook, this memo today, to the scientists and organizations that take that 4.7 billion dollars a year tax money to continue your so called global warming research, and I say to them, it’s bad science. Ladies and gentlemen, please cease and desist that global warming and climate change scare campaign, it’s harmful to the continued advancement of our civilization. The government actions to counter so called carbon pollution, have already raised the cost of food, electricity and fuel by an average of thousand dollars a year for the average American family of four and, the 4.7 billion dollars of our tax money a year being issued to you and your organizations is funding a wide range of meaningless studies based on this bad science that says that carbon dioxide is causing warming. That money could be productively spent on energy research, including  thorium and other new energy sources. Your manipulated climate computer models have dramatically failed both in temperature predictions and their predictive warming signatures. Please admit your errors, it’s time to put principles above personal wealth and status and help restore basic scientific principles to climate research. So I posted the memo, I sent the tweet. I know you are highly skeptical of what I’m saying, how can you believe me when you see this constant stream of global warming news reports day after day, year after year, printed on the internet sites, in all the newspapers, they still print with ink on paper and roll it up and throw it on your driveway… send it in a magazine … and it’s full of this stuff … even our government, our National Oceanographic Atmospheric Agency of the Federal government has established websites to promote climate change, and of course the New York Times it’s been reading that all along … and that’s the power of money. That four point seven billion dollars a year is buying all of this bogus research that is leading to all of these bogus reports. So let me just give you the hard cold facts. I showed you this when I tweeted it … there isn’t any warming going on, there hasn’t been …. Nothing significant is happening, oh we have extreme natural variations in temperature, that’s a hard cold fact, but this recent warming, it’s no different than the warming that’s occurred many times before naturally. We had a medieval optimum when the Roman Empire flourished, and we had the little Ice Age when times were very tough. This little warming we have now? It’s no big deal, it’s no big deal. Now you want to talk about big deals … this is a hard cold fact, from the ice cores, we have determined that we have vacillated on earth between extreme ice ages and these beautiful inter glacial periods of warming weather, and we live in the most recent of these inter glacial periods, we’ve been in it for 12,000 years, probably have another 10, 12,000 years to go before the next ice age comes on naturally, and can we cope with that? Now you hear about the ice melting at the North Pole. What ice melted at the North Pole? It got pretty low in 2007 but this is the last bunch of years since we’ve had satellite observation, about 35 years, and here’s where the ice is now and it’s no big deal. And those polar bears, there are more polar bears living today than have been alive any time since we’ve been counting them, and they’re living all around the North Pole in 19 populations, they’re doing just fine, that’s a hard cold fact. How about the South Pole, well our South Pole as I record this is in Summer time so the ice melt is near the peak for the season, there’s more ice there than above average, it’s near an all time high. Oh, but the water is rising! Along the coast. Is that right? Well it’s rising at about the rate of 6 inches per hundred years as part of this interglacial period. I mean when North America was covered in a four hundred foot thick ice core at the end of the last ice age the oceans were low and then the ice melted and of course the oceans have risen but that rise has been gentle and it’s not important. And then, oh, the super storms … we didn’t have a hurricane hit the US in 2013, the year before only a meager effort and that so called super storm Sandy, it was no big deal as hurricanes go, it didn’t compare with Katrina, didn’t compare with Andrew, and neither of those compared with the Galveston hurricane of 1900, long before man had any influence on climate. Oh the tornadoes, how about those tornadoes, well here’s the chart of tornadoes, strong tornadoes have been diminishing, we now have so many good radars, everybody’s taking pictures with their phones, we see every tornado it seems that form, but folks, there are fewer, and less strong. And drought, well we had a big drought in Texas that vanished, now we have a big drought in California getting a lot of publicity. If you look at the records California falls into drought about once every 11 or 12 years, then we get an El Nino and California gets the rain, comes out of the drought, I mean we’ve got 40 million people living in a desert, of course they’re going to have a water problem, so what, it’s natural, it’s not man made and it comes and it goes, it takes care of itself. Heat waves, what heat waves? We haven’t had a killer heat wave since the ‘50s, so I’ve brought all of these hard cold facts and presented them to you, and compared them to what you read in the press, what you hear on the air, what the networks tout and you say, man what a difference between reality and what’s there. Does Coleman know his reality? You bet I do folks, I study it every day.

But how did this strange strange bad science, how did this global warming, climate change, this crisis, how did it get started? Well that story I’m going to tell you today, that story begins with this great scientist, a man named Roger Revelle who was a graduate of the University of California at Berkley, in Oceanography in 1950, who then served in the Navy during World War II, then became director of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and who led research on the environmental impact of the atomic tests on those atolls out in the Pacific following World War II, both atmospheric & ocean impact, as that was coming to an end, he had a greatly grown the Scripps Oceanographic Institution from an isolated small organization to a huge professional organization with many ships and hundreds of employees, it became clear he had to have something new to work on, and that’s when he decided that something had to give. So he hired this man, Hans Seuss, a Professor from the University of Chicago who had done studies on the effect of carbon on the atmosphere, and Revelle thought maybe there was something to that, so he and Seuss did a research paper & they put it out, in which they asked the question, is mankind’s burning of fossil fuel, our coal and our stokers that were heating our homes, the oil in our cars, the fuel, old fashioned gasoline and old fashioned cars, was all of that creating a climate issue? That was the 1950s folks. And the world was pretty much caught in a smog. I remember as a boy, most of you are probably too young to remember, you choked in the smog that hung over your towns or winter months when those coal burning stokers were going and the cars were just spewing out ash, it was ugly. We were burning old fashioned untreated fuel in old fashioned cars. Well that was the beginning, that paper that Seuss & Revelle put out, is actually the paper that started the global warming frenzy. Oh man did they start something. And Revelle then, he became a powerful man, on the basis of that, the science was used all over the world by other scientists, and he started campaigning to establish a campus at the University of California, co located with his Scripps Oceanographic Institution at California. That was a big darn deal. Well guess what happened? It was located there but something happened. Revelle suffered the greatest defeat of his life. He had campaigned to get that university there & thought he’d be its first Chancellor. But the politics back fired on him. And he wasn’t named Chancellor of that university and he was hurt. So what did he do? He suddenly made a big move. He changed his life. He packed up and went to Harvard where he started the Centre for Population Studies. So there he was in Boston in 1967. Now what does this have to do with the global warming story? This is what it has to do with it. That first year, one of his students was this young man, Al Gore. The only science class Al Gore ever took. Revelle didn’t remember having him in class, but Al Gore who got a D in the course was highly impressed. He was the son of a politician out of Tennessee and he used what he learned there to start his global warming campaign. He wrote a book called Earth in the Balance, he ran for the US Senate, he claimed that the earth was being challenged by the burning of fossil fuels and it got him elected to the US Senate, and there in the Senate he conducted hearings, bringing in scientists and spreading the scare of global warming, & that’s when the money began to flow to the government research, and this was the booby trap, because once billions of dollars of government funding was going out to these organizations and universities & research groups from across the nation, and they had this back that global warming claim that Al Gore was promoting with their research, the research began to pile up, and if you were a young scientist you didn’t have a choice, you couldn’t put out a research paper that said, oh, what warming? You’d be out of a job, you’d lose your car, your family would be walking on the streets. No you had to support it. Al Gore had taken Revelle and Seuss’s research paper & used it to start the global warming campaign. Now what did Al Gore say? He said Roger Revelle is my mentor, he’s my hero … he’s the man who spread the alarm. Well there’s another man who picked that up. This man, Maurice Strong. Maurice had become a Democrat at the United Nations. In 1972, he had a conference in Stockholm on the environment and his whole goal was for one world government, & he used that impetus of global warming scare, at that Stockholm conference to start the initiative that set up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Now we had the US government and the United Nations both promoting climate change, & it all came from that Revelle Seuss paper and the research that followed and the dollars that were now flowing and man it was under way big time. And so the IPPC had scientists and bureaucrats & politicians from throughout the world. It had the WWF, the Sierra Club, all the environmentalists, and they all got together and they voted that global warming was for real. Well I’ve got to tell you something, you don’t sell science by a vote, it’s not a political issue, it’s not a vote, it’s science. Ah but never mind they put out their reports and they spent a lot of time telling us how we were destroying planet earth & they had fancy meetings in tropical locations throughout the world, and the scientists who supported global warming, paid vacation trips to these big meetings, & got to write these books and have their names and their careers and man it was a big deal. And what did Al Gore do? Well he wrote a second book about global warming called, ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, and we all know what became of that. His liberal friends in Hollywood turned that into a documentary, a sci fi documentary I might add, all about global warming, and they voted themselves an Oscar, best documentary film of the year in 2007, and then they turned around and Al Gore stood behind the IPCC President & they got the Nobel Peace prize. All for scaring us about global warming. So, Gore’s movie, An Inconvenient Truth became an absolute mainstay in American schools… how many times did you see it in school? Over and over  again, and the global warming frenzy had truly reached its peak when all of that happened. Well what happened with this man, Roger Revelle who had started it all, the great scientist? Well he kind of lost interest in this Population Study Centre at Harvard and missed San Diego I guess and the beautiful Sthn California climate and he swallowed hard for his defeat there and he came back to the University of California San Diego as a Professor and  there, there he wrote these letters and I want you to look at them. The first one goes from his desk to US Congressman, Tim Worth, quote, ‘We should be careful not to arouse too much alarm about the rate and amount of warming before it becomes clear’ and he wrote another letter here to Congressman Tim Bates, ‘Most scientists familiar with the subject are not yet willing to bet that climate this year is the result of greenhouse warming. As you very well know, climate is highly variable year to year. The causes of these variations are not at all well understood. My own personal belief is that we should wait another 10-20 years to really be convinced that the green house is going to be important for human beings and in positive and negative ways. So there it was, the man who had started the global warming campaign had put up the flag of warning. ‘Hey folks, this may not be for real, caution, caution’. Well he even wrote an article that was published in a new science magazine called Cosmos. And he teamed with a Professor Ted Singer to write that article, and that article was called, ‘What to do about Greenhouse Warming: Look Before You Leap’. And the article concluded and I quote; ‘the scientific basis for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time’. Wow. The man who had started it? Well how did Al Gore react to that? Well he said, ‘I’ve made up my mind, Revelle is now senile, pay no attention, the debate is over’ and you’ve been hearing that now for 20 years. Al Gore won’t debate anybody and he claims it’s for real. Well we lost Revelle, he passed away of a heart attack in 1991. And after he died his family joined with the people at Scripps to make him the father of global warming. They rejected his denial and so did the UN and IPCC. But Dr Singer, he was made to be the scapegoat for it all. They said that he had caused it. Well I finally was able to interview Dr Singer about this controversy. ‘Dr Singer what was Roger Revelle’s view of carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas when you co authored that Cosmos article back in 1990?’ Reply: ‘he was very relaxed about it… he basically looked at this as a grandeur physical experiment … after he and his collaborators like David Keeling found that CO2 was in fact increasing in the atmosphere, he and his colleagues were wondering if it would have any impact on climate. He wasn’t about to make any judgement on the matter until the data were in. of course at that time, by 1990 we had about more than 10 years worth of satellite data & the satellites didn’t show any appreciable warming & this is what actually set off my own thinking on the matter. I wondered why; what was going on? After all Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, it’s increasing. There’s no question about that. Where is the warming? Well it turns out that the atmosphere is much more complicated than the climate models believed, and the warming is offset probably by a kind of negative feedback that comes from clouds and water vapour in the atmosphere. Are you saying that back in 1990 that Revelle was somewhat regretful of the excitement that he had caused about global warming? Ah Revelle, um at that time, had written some letters to his Congressmen and to Senator Worth, telling them to calm down, not get excited about it, but wait and see what would happen to the climate. In other words he was telling them, don’t assume that things are going to warm up just because the models say so. He was actually very skeptical of climate models, much moreso than I was. I was always more optimistic hoping that they would improve enough so they could really simulate what’s going on in the atmosphere. Revelle had not much faith in models. Well since that time many people have said, that you were the one that manipulated Revelle, that you kind of calmed him down or changed his feelings in the way you put that article together; that Gore said he was a senile old man when you co authored that paper, and that therefore you took your position on CO2 and more or less assigned it to Revelle and they put a lot of blame on you. Well that’s absolutely untrue. First of all if you knew Revelle, you would know that he was sharp right to the very very end and you could not change his mind … he knew what he was doing all the time. And furthermore we have written proof. We have the letters he wrote to his Congressman and the Senator, we also have an interview in Omni magazine, so there’s plenty of evidence to show that he was quite independent minded, and that he didn’t believe in global warming until the day they would show him a warming and by 1990 they really weren’t, the satellite data were not showing the warming. Did you and Revelle talk about Gore at all? Actually no we never did come to think of it. We only discussed the science. Revelle’s politics were very different from mine. He was a supporter of Gore. He was a Liberal Democrat by inclination and I think and every other way. But when it came to science, we completely agreed.

The interview that I had with Dr Singer, now he’s not the only scientist, please understand this, who questions this global warming frenzy. This climate change scare. In ****fact there are 9,000 PHDs have signed a petition denying that CO2 is causing global warming. There’s 31,000 scientists in total who have signed that petition. There is a whole organization of them. A huge group from NASA recently wrote to the UN and to the US Congress saying please stop the global warming scare. There is a strong movement opposed to global warming. You don’t hear about it in the media because the media has that Al Gore liberal bias so it becomes very tough. And at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, they gave Al Gore the first Roger Revelle award … in recognition of his environmental work.

‘We’re honoured tonight at Scripps Institute of Oceanography … he was given an award in recognition of his environmental work, KUSI Tom Jordan is live in La Hoya with more on that … Tom, Al Gore was the first ever recipient of the Roger Revelle prize here at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, honoured tonight for his work in environmental preservation. A rousing welcome for a man continuing his continuing campaign on environmental awareness and protection. Former Vice President Al Gore being honoured for his efforts with the first ever Roger Revelle prize. (Gore) ‘I want to express my very deep & genuine gratitude for this honour…. ‘

The award presented at this dinner marking the 100th birthday of the late Roger Revelle who headed Scripps Institute of Oceanography from 1958 to 1964. Gore studied under Revelle at Harvard University in the 1960s and credits him with igniting his passion on the environment.

(Gore) ‘As a former student  … still a student, trying to learn, but still inspired by a great teacher, who was a great scientist and a great man.’

Roger Revelle’s work back in the 1960s was at the time considered revolutionary. Today many scientists consider that work almost prophetic.

And at that time they wrote a short report and we were told it was a very short report saying that climate change is becoming an issue, the earth is heating up, and therefore something needs to be done about that.

Al Gore says he was deeply moved by Revelle’s early work, he now considered at the forefront of the global warming movement. A Nobel Peace Prize winner, an Oscar winning documentarian all from his work on the environment. Now he adds a new distinguished & personal honour to that list.

(Gore) I am deeply deeply grateful.

And tonight’s celebration was part of 3 days of celebrating the life of Roger Revelle. He would have been 100 years old tomorrow. We’re live in La Hoya, I’m Tom Jordan KUSI News. Thanks Tom, John Coleman believes there is no significant man-made global warming & he travels the nation speaking on the topic. John has some insights now on Roger Revelle’s scientific research and the effect that it had on Al Gore.

(Coleman) …. Well Revelle was a powerful man, a noteworthy scientist and a significant force here in San Diego in the 1950s. There’s no doubt that he’s largely responsible for the high status of the Scripps Institute of Oceanography in its field, and for locating the University of California at San Diego, and UCSD at La Hoya.

While serving as Director at Scripps Institute of Oceanography, Revelle & one of his researchers wrote the first modern scientific paper that linked carbon dioxide released into the air from the burning of fossil fuels & the greenhouse effect and the warming of temperatures. Well this triggered an avalanche of research that eventually became the impetus behind the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change & the entire global warming movement. In the 1960s Revelle moved to Harvard to establish a center for population studies. This is where Prof Revelle encountered student Albert Gore. He involved Gore & his classmates in the tabulating of data from a carbon dioxide study. Gore was so impressed he wrote about it in his 1992 book, ‘Earth in the Balance’ that became the story for the movie ‘An Inconvenient Truth’, the Oscar & the Nobel Peace Prize, and some people say one hundred million dollars all came from that. There is no doubt Roger Revelle had a major impact on Vice President Gore’s life.

(Coleman) … there’s a twist. In 1988 Roger Revelle was having second thoughts about whether carbon dioxide was a significant greenhouse gas … he wrote letters to Congressmen about it. And in 1991 he co authored a report for the new science magazine, Cosmos in which he expressed his strong doubts about global warming and urged more research before any remedial action was taken.

(News again) At that point Mr Gore pronounced Revelle senile & refused to debate global warming. He continues to refuse to debate. Many offers of thousands of dollars have been made for debate but he refuses. Today sequestered the media to set forth rules, no questions, no interviews.

(Coleman) I have learned that in 1991 Roger Revelle made what was his final speech at the high powered very private summer enclave of powerful men and politicians from Bohemian Grove in Nthn California. There he apologized for his research, for sending so man people in the wrong direction on global warming. And he worried about the political fallout from the UN IPCC and Al Gore. A man named Don Michael Schmedman who lives in the San Francisco area was there that day. And he remembers the Revelle speech very well. He has told me about it in some detail. So think of the irony today. Al Gore received the first Roger Revelle award honouring the man who sent him on his global warming campaign. But Revelle had realized that it was a false alarm and that the science was flawed before he died.

(Coleman) … Revelle  died of a heart attack in 1991. it would be interesting to know that if he had lived  would he be approving of the award that was given tonight? Or perhaps would he be joining me at the international conference of global warming skeptics in New York next week. If you want to read the article on global warming that I have written you can go to KUSI dot com, click on Coleman’s corner.

This is really interesting. We haven’t heard this information at all before.

Well I’ve done a lot of digging over the last year or two to find all of this, and really fascinated me when I stumbled across the Bohemian Grove speech … it’s not documented anywhere.

This is the first time your orbits have crossed, you and Al Gore. You’re both in the same city for 24 hours and we couldn’t get the two of you to meet.

Well Mr Gore of course is the former Vice President, he’s the man who got 52 million votes for President, served very honourably as a politician, I think he would have little regard for me.

You’d like to debate him wouldn’t you?

Well sure I’d love to debate him, but you understand, this isn’t political, I’m a journalist, a meteorologist, my interest is strictly in the science.

Thank you John.

So that’s the report, and I’m sure you’re wondering why I have I never heard of all this before? Why hasn’t the media full of it? Why do I keep hearing about global warming and its threat to our civilization? Well it’s 4.7 billion dollars a year of our tax money, and that’s the power of money. Now everything I’ve had in this report is posted, including the complete interview with the Dr Singer. You only saw part of that interview. And a lot of other material is posted on my Coleman’s Corner website at KUSI dot com. Now I’d be delighted to have you look there. I’m also a regular reader of a site called ‘What’s up with that?’ where my friend Anthony Watts hosts any number of skeptical papers on global warming, the research flows there on a daily basis. Now what’s going to defeat this global warming scare? It’s like David and Goliath. I don’t think we can defeat $4.7 billion, the Democrat Party, the UN & the Sierra Club and the Wildlife Federation and all of them. They just claim that we’re deniers and old goats and they think we’re bought and paid for by the big oil companies which we are not, we don’t have anything to do with them, but I don’t think we can defeat them. What’s going to defeat them? Time. A few more bitterly cold winters. A turn towards a colder climate. When the global warming fails to materialize in time, people will begin to believe and I have noted that recent gallup polls show that more and more people are saying, global warming that’s not the big deal. We got a lot of big deals going on, you know employment, jobs, govt too big, that sort of thing. The list of their concerns is very interesting. Those are on it. The global warming’s down toward the bottom of the list.

jcoleman@kusi.com