Category Archives: CDC

Vaccinated at 11am, dead by 1:54pm: CDC documentation

It is a curious state of being we have arrived at as a nation you may agree? Abroad, as the vaccine is rolled out we have seen literally thousands of adverse reactions reported, over a thousand of those are deaths (and remember only 1% are reported in total), and STILL, the NZ ‘vaccine expert’ Helen Pertousis-Harris tells us there is no demonstration of a causative link. This may be correct technically. Of course I have not noted any sounding of the alarm that the rollout should stop until they have investigated those events, done postmortems etc, to figure out what caused all of the deaths. Instead the rollout continues unabated.

Pause and think for a little. Is there not something very wrong with this picture?

If you are still on the fence and deciding yes or no … at least read this information and educate yourself from the documented info available before proceeding. EWR

So here below we have a CDC download describing many of the reactions, many serious and life threatening, and many deaths. The one cited is from page 2 in the document. See FAQs at the link to learn about the source and to read of many more incidents. (Note DNR is do not resuscitate):

“The resident received is vaccine around 11:00 am and tolerated it without any difficulty or immediate adverse effects. He was at therapy from 12:36 pm until 1:22pm when he stated he was too tired and could not do any more. The therapist took him back to his room at that time and he got into bed himself but stated his legs felt heavy. At 1:50 pm the CNA answered his call light and found he had taken himself to the bathroom.She stated that when he went to get back into the bed it was “”abnormal”” how he was getting into it so she assisted him. At that time he quit breathing and she called a RN into the room immediately. He was found without a pulse, respirations, or blood pressure at 1:54pm. He was a DNR.”

https://www.activenews.ro/documente/The%20Vaccine%20Adverse%20Event%20Reporting%20System%20(VAERS)%20Results%20Form.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2pbnYDmUjUuMnX1CreCLENxBP2Lg6KkSprThHyi71bc66TtCRUR86raFM

Image by torstensimon from Pixabay

One-Third of Deaths Reported to CDC After COVID Vaccines Occurred Within 48 Hours of Vaccination

Still not causative then going by NZ’s Immunologist?

The numbers reflect the latest data available as of Feb. 12 from the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System website. Of the 929 reported deaths, about one-third occurred within 48 hours.

By Children’s Health Defense Team

According to new data released today, as of Feb. 12, 15,923 adverse reactions to COVID vaccines, including 929 deaths, have been reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) since Dec. 14, 2020.

VAERS is the primary mechanism in the U.S. for reporting adverse vaccine reactions. Reports submitted to VAERS require further investigation before a determination can be made as to whether the reported adverse event was directly or indirectly caused by the vaccine.

READ MORE

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/latest-data-cdc-vaers/?utm_source=salsa&eType=EmailBlastContent&eId=7669d08c-efe7-4459-b6c6-06e4f4efc065

Image from Pixabay

CDC: 929 Dead 15,923 Injured Reported Following Experimental mRNA COVID Injections

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

The CDC has done another data dump today into the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), a U.S. Government funded database that tracks injuries and deaths caused by vaccines.

The data goes through February 12, 2021, with 15,923 recorded adverse events, including 929 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna.

READ MORE

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-929-dead-15923-injured-reported-following-experimental-mrna-covid-injections/

Image by Carolyn Booth from Pixabay

CDC WITHOLDING INFORMATION! 1,170 DEAD Following COVID Injections: Almost Twice as Many Deaths as Found in VAERS

by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Yesterday we reported that the CDC had done another data dump into the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, showing that through February 4, 2021, there were 12,697 recorded adverse events, including 653 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna.

After publishing this article, a Health Impact News subscriber sent me a link to a page on the CDC website where they are reporting that as of February 11, 2021, VAERS received 1,170 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine.

The page, at least at the time of publication today, is located here: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/vaccines/safety/adverse-events.html.

We have captured a screen shot of this page, and made some editorial edits.

READ MORE

LINK: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-witholding-information-1170-dead-following-covid-injections-almost-twice-as-many-deaths-as-found-in-vaers/

CDC DATA: 200,000 “COVID DEATHS” MAY ACTUALLY BE FLU, HEART ATTACKS, POISON, OR GUNSHOT

https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/

Coronavirus statistics may be being inflated in a way that boggles the mind.   In April Dr. Deboroah Birx of the White House Coronavirus Task Force made clear that primary-cause COVID deaths, and deaths in which COVID was merely present, would be taken as one and the same.  Birx said: “to mark it as COVID-19 infection the intent is right now that those if someone dies with COVID-19 we are counting that as a COVID-19.” The key words were “with COVID” and “COVID death.”  The very fact that Birx was erasing the distinction showed that she was aware that there was one. The government was true to its word. In making “with COVID” the same as “of COVID,” COVID totals could differ sharply from reality.    At present, the COVID totals being announced by mass media, taken from the CDC, are defined as any death “involving” COVID, whether it was the primary cause of death or not.  

READ MORE

https://robinwestenra.blogspot.com/

CDC Stops Reporting on Experimental COVID mRNA Injection Side Effects

Note: remember the CDC is a private organization, not government. EWR

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just released its weekly Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), and for the second week in a row, there is no new data on adverse reactions to the two FDA emergency use authorization (EUA) COVID mRNA injections.

The last report on the experimental injections and the adverse side effects was from January 6, 2021, and only covered the first week of injections with the experimental Pfizer COVID mRNA shots, with an emphasis on allergic reactions and anaphylaxis shock.

The report on January 6th did not cover the Moderna injections which have also received emergency use authorization by the FDA.

Injuries and deaths due to the experimental COVID injections are being reported in the U.S. and around the world, so why is the CDC not examining these adverse side effects and reporting on them?

READ MORE

LINK: https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/cdc-stops-reporting-on-experimental-covid-mrna-injection-side-effects/

RELATED: https://envirowatchrangitikei.wordpress.com/2020/04/19/cdc-is-not-an-independent-govt-agency-it-is-a-privately-owned-subsidiary-of-big-pharma/

CDC removes blanket claim “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from its website

LINK: https://markcrispinmiller.com/2021/01/cdc-removes-blanket-claim-vaccines-do-not-cause-autism-from-its-website/



 

ICAN, through its attorneys led by Aaron Siri, has been relentless in its legal demands and actions to compel the CDC to remove its blanket claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from its website.  We are excited to report that the CDC has finally capitulated to those demands!  It has removed this claim from its website!  

CDC’s Autism-Vaccine Page
Old Version
New Version




The more than three-year journey for how ICAN, and its legal team, achieved this result is a story of determined persistence.  Here are the highlights.
 
ICAN’s Opening Salvo (Oct. 12, 2017 – Dec. 31, 2018)
 
The journey began with a letter sent to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on October 12, 2017.  That letter explained why the CDC cannot scientifically claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” on its website.  ICAN then ended with the following demand: “Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’ from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?
To put HHS and the CDC (an agency within HHS) on their heels, mere days after sending this letter, ICAN also sent a FOIA request on November 1, 2017, demanding:
 
All reports, scientific studies, and any other documents the CDC relied upon to support the assertion “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” located on its website at http://www.cdc.gov/‌vaccinesafety/concerns/autism.html.
 
The CDC quickly called ICAN’s counsel, Aaron Siri, regarding this request. After some negotiations, the CDC formally responded on November 7, 2017, stating that “A search of our records failed to reveal any documents beyond the records hyperlinked in the specific web site” to support the claim that vaccines do not cause autism.  The CDC had thus revealed a truth, one that HHS could not run from in its response to ICAN’s letter. 
 
On January 18, 2018, HHS responded to ICAN’s October 12th letter.  In that letter, HHS provided a list of studies it said supported the conclusion on its website that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.”  All of the studies cited related either to a single vaccine, MMR, or to a single vaccine ingredient, thimerosal.  None of these studies support the claim that vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism.
 
Given that HHS failed to support its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism,” ICAN responded by letter dated December 31, 2018 wherein ICAN asserted that “HHS cannot scientifically claim that ‘Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism’” and “must therefore remove this claim from the CDC website until it can produce the studies to support the claim.”
           
ICAN’s Pincer Maneuver (Jan. 1, 2019 to June 18, 2019)
                                                    
In order to keep the pressure on to force the CDC to be honest with the public, during the first six months of 2019, ICAN submitted numerous requests for communications among key personnel within the CDC relating to autism.  Some of these requests sought emails going back decades.  The key players within the CDC with regard to vaccines and autism now knew we were watching, and that we would have their unvarnished, internal emails related to autism. 

ICAN Drops the Gauntlet (June 19, 2019 to Dec. 30, 2019)

Now that ICAN had gathered the proof in the form of evidence and admissions it needed to hold the CDC’s feet to the fire, on June 19, 2019, ICAN demanded that the CDC produce copies of the studies it relies upon to claim that all the vaccines given during the first six months of life “Do Not Cause Autism.”  These vaccines include DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV.  ICAN also demanded that the CDC produce studies to support that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life “Do Not Cause Autism.”
 
ICAN, of course, already had the CDC’s admissions on these points from its prior FOIA request in November 2017, the HHS letter exchange, and the CDC’s internal emails.  The CDC had nowhere to hide and no way to dissemble.  As expected, it responded to ICAN’s request with the same list of studies involving MMR or thimerosal.  Not a single study supported that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism. 

ICAN Battles the CDC in Court (Dec. 31, 2019 to March 5, 2020)

ICAN then put the pressure directly on the CDC.  Instead of walking away after the CDC effectively admitted it did not have the studies ICAN sought, ICAN sued the CDC in federal court.  The suit focused on the CDC’s claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” on the basis that the CDC had not specifically listed the precise studies that it asserts support that claim.  This lawsuit also quoted from the deposition of Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the godfather of vaccinology, who admitted under oath that he was “okay with telling the parent that DTaP/Tdap does not cause autism even though the science isn’t there yet to support that claim.”    
 
After a lot of wrangling between ICAN’s counsel Aaron Siri, and the Department of Justice, which was representing the CDC, the CDC finally capitulated and signed a stipulation that was entered as an order of the court on March 2, 2020in which the CDC identified 20 studies as the universe of support it relies upon to claim that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism.  Here is a summary of the vaccines these studies cover:
 
·      1 relating to MMR (not a vaccine ICAN asked about);
·      13 relating to thimerosal (not an ingredient in any vaccine ICAN asked about);
·      4 relating to both MMR and thimerosal;
·      1 relating to antigen (not a vaccine) exposure; and
·      1 relating to MMR, thimerosal, and DTaP.
 
Incredibly, the one study relating to DTaP on the CDC’s list was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review looking specifically for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism.  The IOM concluded that it could not identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism. Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism.
 
In other words, the only study the CDC listed that actually looked at any of the vaccines given to babies during the first six months of life concluded that there are no studies to support that DTaP does not cause autism.  Yet, the CDC chose that study as one of the few that supports its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism”! 
 
This reality is truly incredible because, when it comes to autism, vaccines are the one suspected culprit that the CDC claims to have exhaustively investigated but, yet, the CDC could not provide a single study to support its conclusion that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. 
 
The CDC regularly complains that those raising concerns about vaccine safety are unscientific and misinformed.  It is therefore truly stunning that when we asked the CDC for studies to support its claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism,” the March 2, 2020 stipulation and order made it abundantly clear that it was the CDC’s own claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” that was unscientific.
 
            ICAN’s Coup de Grâce (Mar. 6, 2020 to Aug. 26, 2020)
And now for the coup de grâce.  ICAN’s demands at the end of 2019 and over which it took the CDC to court in early 2020 were for the studies the CDC “relied upon” to claim that Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.  ICAN now had a court ordered stipulation that specifically listed the twenty studies the CDC “relied upon” to support this claim – none of which supported that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. 
 
To assure that the CDC understood ICAN was never, ever, ever, letting this issue go, on March 6, 2020 (days after concluding the federal lawsuit) ICAN submitted the following FOIA demand to the CDC: “All studies supporting the claim that DTaP does not cause autism” and days later requested “Studies created or retained by CDC to support the claim that DTaP does not cause autism.”  The difference between this and ICAN’s prior requests is subtle but powerful.  Instead of asking for the studies the CDC “relied upon” to support that DTaP does not cause autism (as it did previously), ICAN was now seeking the studies that in fact support that DTaP does not cause autism. 
 
In response to this request, the CDC could not list its MMR or thimerosal studies – its hands were tied.  It understood there was nowhere left to hide its unsupported claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.”  And it knew that ICAN would again take it to court, and this time the outcome could be even harsher. 
 
            The CDC Capitulates

On the heels of the foregoing, and dozens of related demands regarding autism that ICAN continued to press, in the dead of the night, and without any fanfare or announcement, on August 27, 2020, the CDC website removed the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism” from its website!  The CDC had finally capitulated to the truth!   
 
Compare for yourself the CDC’s autism-vaccine webpage on August 26, 2020versus August 27, 2020.
 
You may be wondering why we waited until now to announce this amazing news.  Well, ICAN and its legal team have been so busy fighting on dozens of vaccine related fronts (mandatory MMR vaccines, flu shot requirements, improper COVID vaccine trials, etc.) that we only realized the CDC’s vaccine-autism claim had been removed when we recently turned back to that front!  Like a Mayan temple hidden in plain sight for hundreds of years, ICAN only recently discovered the CDC’s silent capitulation.    
 
            The Future
 
The most recent data from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the United States will develop autism. This is a true epidemic. If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child’s autism, the world would be a better place for everyone.
 
To their credit, parents with autistic children have never backed down.  In the face of incessant brow beatings by public health authorities, studies have found between 40% and 70% of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child’s autism, typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life.  These parents know what they experienced, what their parental instincts tell them, and no amount of shaming can change that truth.  
 
With the removal of the claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism,” it is ICAN’s sincere hope that our public health authorities have turned or will soon be turning the corner on this issue.  That they will fund independent scientists to conduct the desperately needed studies of autism and the cumulative impact of the vaccines given during the first six months of life. 
 
The cries of parents who know that vaccines caused their child’s autism should no longer be ignored.  The science must be done. And ICAN will continue to fight to make sure that that it is done.
 
            Epilogue

The CDC’s website does continue to claim that “Vaccine ingredients do not cause autism” and so ICAN’s fight continues!  Our next step will be to force the CDC to admit whether or not they are also making this claim for aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines.  And if so, to produce the studies to support this claim.  (See ICAN’s white paper on aluminum adjuvants and autism here.)
 
Of course, whether one or more ingredients, like water used in vaccines, does not cause autism is not really the issue.  The question is whether the vaccine, the product itself as formulated, causes autism.  And we now know that the CDC finally understands that it can no longer claim that “Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism.”  
 
This victory for truth and science could not have happened without the encouragement ICAN receives from its supporters like you.  Thank you for making our work possible!
Stand for vaccine truth and help us keep winning with your  tax-deductible  gift of $20, $30, $50, $100, or more today!
SUPPORT ICAN TODAY

CDC Announces That Students May Be Kept From Parents FEMA Camps (09 10 2020)

See at youtube for channel details. I have listened right through and the information is directly from the CDC’s (that private corporation) website. It is certainly a scenario to be aware of & to be looking out for anyway. We had similar brushes with it in NZ here (even though Adern has since said they will not be taking children). People in quarantine with statements their children would be best separated into different parts of the facility, in particular a two year old. Totally inappropriate. So yes, it’s not my intention to scare people, but to say, just be aware of this suggestion. The suggestions or the ‘mays’ are often just getting you used to the idea. It will never be appropriate to separate children, especially little ones, from their parents. If you think about that, someone is going to be caring for that child and the best person is its natural parent, not a terrifying stranger in PPE gear. In my opinion this is a sinister suggestion at best. EWR

Terral BlackStar 27.8K subscribers

CDC Announces That Students May Be Kept From Parents Overnight as Ohio Sets Up COVID-19 FEMA Camps The onslaught of tyranny continues. Submitted by Marv The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is warning parents that their children may be kept from their parents overnight due to COVID-19 concerns, as states set up COVID-19 shelters where infected individuals could be forcibly quarantined. “Tell school administrators about any extra supplies your child may need to safely make it through a night away from home,” the CDC wrote to parents in their advisory. “Bring extra medicines, special foods, or supplies your child would need if separated overnight. “Complete a backpack card and tuck one in your child’s backpack and your wallet,” they added. https://bigleaguepolitics.com/cdc-ann… Natural News story: https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-09-0…

READ MORE AT THE LINK

Image by pedro_wroclaw from Pixabay

CDC Privately Changed Their Fatality Reporting Guidelines, Over-inflating Deaths by 92.2%

Remember, the CDC is a private corporation & not a government agency. EWR

From GreenMedInfo

Originally published on www.childrenshealthdefense.org

By H. Ealy, M. McEvoy, M. Sava, S. Gupta, D. Chong, D. White, J. Nowicki, P. Anderson

Key Findings For Data Through July 12th

  • According to the CDC, 101 children age 0 to 14 have died from influenza, while 31 children have died from COVID-19.
  • No evidence exists to support the theory that children pose a threat to educational professionals in a school or classroom setting, but there is a great deal of evidence to support the safety of in-person education.
  • According to the CDC, 131,332 Americans have died from pneumonia and 121,374 from COVID-19 as of July 11th, 2020.
  • Had the CDC used its industry standard, Medical Examiners’ and Coroners’ Handbook on Death Registration and Fetal Death Reporting Revision 2003, as it has for all other causes of death for the last 17 years, the COVID-19 fatality count would be approximately 90.2% lower than it currently is.

Abstract

The CDC has instructed hospitals, medical examiners, coroners and physicians to collect and report COVID-19 data by significantly different standards than all other infectious diseases and causes of death.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were instituted by the CDC in private, and without open discussion among qualified professionals that are free from conflicts of interest.

These new and unnecessary guidelines were additionally instituted despite the existence of effective rules for data collection and reporting, successfully used by all hospitals, medical examiners, coroners, and physicians for more than 17 years.

As a result, elected officials have enacted many questionable policies that have injured our country’s economy, our country’s educational system, our country’s mental and emotional health, and the American citizen’s personal expression of Constitutionally-protected rights to participate in our own governance.

This paper will present significant evidence to support the position that if the CDC simply employed their 2003 industry standard for data collection and reporting, which has been successfully used nationwide for 17 years; the total fatalities attributed to COVID-19 would be reduced by an estimated 90.2%, and questions would be non-existent regarding schools reopening and whether or not Americans should be allowed to work.

READ MORE

LINK: https://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/if-covid-fatalities-were-902-lower-how-would-you-feel-about-schools-reopening?

RELATED:

The privately owned CDC played up flu deaths in 2003 because the public was declining their advice on the flu shot

Image by Gerd Altmann from Pixabay

The Big Coronavirus Testing Con Job

From Lew Rockwell

CDC changes the way it tabulates cases

The news media doesn’t inform the public the Centers for Disease Control has changed the way it determines COVID-19 severity and now includes symptomatic and asymptomatic cases in its tabulations.  It is a categorical increase, not an increase in the spread or virility of the virus.

The Center for Evidence-Based Medicine cites a broad range (5% to 80%) of people who test positive for COVID-19 but are without symptoms.  This has led public health authorities to issue misdirected advisories to stay indoors as asymptomatic individuals may be spreading the virus.  Everybody is then an imagined threat to your life.  But it takes 40,500 encounters with infected people to get infected and over 6 million encounters to produce 1 death.  Mask-wearing Americans are just mindlessly following devious instructions they hear on TV.

READ MORE

LINK: https://www.lewrockwell.com/2020/07/bill-sardi/the-big-coronavirus-testing-con-job/

Image by fernando zhiminaicela from Pixabay

A short statement by RFK Jr made about the CDC, how it’s structured, and how it operates, years before the present scandal

CDC is basically a subsidiary of Big Pharma. It is not a government department. It is a private corporation.

https://www.brasscheck.com/video/rfk-jr-on-the-cdc/