If you have one of these meters installed already listen & read below. If you don’t have one, check out the information which your powerco will deny or greatly minimize. Particularly, if you are still unconvinced, you should watch Take Back Your Power. It is available at the site of that name for a small fee to watch online. This is a real eye opener, a self funded doco by Josh del Sol on the independent research. He uncovers all the detail the industry doesn’t want you to know.
Maine’s Smart Meter Safety Coalition (www.smartmetersafety.org) recently caught up with Dr. David Carpenter, a Harvard Medical School-trained physician who headed up the New York State Dept. of Public Health for 18 years before becoming Dean of the School of Public Health at the University of Albany, where he currently directs the Institute for Health and the Environment.
Now watch what a Smart Meter does to your blood …
Check out our Smart Meter pages at the main menu. See also Stopsmartmeters NZ’s site for info on how not to get one, or how to get one removed. Plus other information from Kiwis who describe the health effects they experienced.
More on the insidious pesticide that is poisoning NZ. Kiwis love the stuff & spray it everywhere totally oblivious to any independent research that goes against the well established Monsanto mantra that tells them it’s pretty much ‘safe as houses’. See our Glyphosate pages at the main menu for more info & for links to the huge body of research that says it isn’t safe as houses. EnvirowatchRangitikei
(NaturalHealth365) Roundup has been a top-selling weed killer since its release in the 1970s. Numerous studies have connected its active ingredient, glyphosate, with a number of serious health problems – especially to the unborn child. More recently, it’s been found that one of the so-called “inert” ingredients in Roundup could be making the effects of glyphosate much worse.
“Inert” ingredients refer to preservatives, surfactants, solvents and other substances that are added to herbicides and pesticides. About 4,000 different inert ingredients have been approved for addition to weed killer products like Roundup by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Editor’s note: The collusion between the biotech (chemical) industry and government agencies is far worse than you can imagine. I strongly suggest you watch GMOs Revealed – a docuseries that exposes how corporate giants, like Monsanto, are knowingly poisoning our food and environment. Educate yourself and discover a definite way to avoid being harmed.
Not all so-called “inert” ingredients in Roundup are inert
Research conducted by a French team associated with the University of Caen shows that certain inert ingredients can have the effect of amplifying the toxicity of glyphosate on human cells. One specific inert ingredient, POEA (polyethoxylated tallowamine), was particularly deadly to human placental, umbilical cord and embryonic cells.
These findings indicates that the so-called inert ingredients in Roundup weed killer are far from inert. This effect occurred even at concentrations of the herbicide that were considerably more diluted than what is typically used. Even at residual levels on lawns, gardens and crops, these chemicals could be causing major cellular damage.
More bad news on the chemo front. There are Health professionals who say it only works 3% of the time anyway. Research the alternative solutions others have found to be successful. There’s plenty of evidence for their success being way beyond 3%. I know where I’d be putting my money. See our Cancer pages at the main menu. Don’t wait til after you get the diagnosis. Be prepared. EnvirowatchRangitikei
Breast cancer survival rates have been improving in recent years. However, this news that chemotherapy can actually promote the spread of cancer would make it by far one of the most disturbing chemotherapy side effects ever documented.
Common chemotherapy treatment triggers Atf3 gene, increasing cancer-related cellular stress
The researchers, working out of the Ohio State University in Columbus biological chemistry and pharmacology department, found that chemotherapy used as a treatment for breast cancer has a counterintuitive effect which increases the risk of metastasis instead of reducing it as intended.
Past studies had also suggested that chemo can cause cellular changes in both humans and mice with breast cancer. The Ohio State University researchers decided to dig deeper. The team studied the drug paclitaxel, one of the most common frontline chemotherapy treatments used for breast, lung and ovarian cancer. Specifically, they looked at the relationship of breast cancer to the closest organs, the lungs, when treated with paclitaxel.
Mice were studied as well as existing data from breast cancer patients. They found that persons who received paclitaxel chemotherapy treatments had an overexpresssed Atf3 gene. The Atf3 gene is a transcription factor that’s known to be activated by stress and connected with the cellular stress mechanism.
Researchers stunned by pro-cancer side effects of commonly-used drugs
The Atf3 gene is commonly expressed found in a wide variety of cancer cells. By contrast, persons who did not receive chemo did not show an overexpression of this stress gene. The findings indicate paclitaxel can actually have a carcinogenic effect through the activation of this gene.
Listen to the Doctor himself tell his story. He’s written a book about it as well. Jailed for treating people with cancer (successfully) … people with three months to live still alive in five years. Truly cause for concern when a Doctor extends somebody’s life span by a few years (plus) isn’t it? His practice raided Gestapo style. People must surely join dots at this and see something is very very wrong with this picture. EnvirowatchRangitikei
Never told because after all, people might catch on and tell others (which they are anyway now). This has to be one of the biggest cover ups in history. I too cringe when I see these masts towering over school yards for heaven’s sakes. People are so oblivious to the dangers because they so trust the authorities. These towers have been found to have clusters of cancer sicknesses and deaths around them. Watch Take Back Your Power, very enlightening. If you hear of the erection of one of these things near your home or workplace, get involved in opposing it. The industries will otherwise just plonk them wherever they choose. They have no regard whatsoever for your health and will literally deny everything. (All that independent research included). Look at our EMF, and related pages at the main menu for further info. For good measure I’ve thrown in two other videos on topic, one on the health risks from a PhD in physics (ex British Royal Navy, SAS so you should listen to him) and one on how some people in California managed to keep one out of their vicinity. They put up a huge stink and succeeded. The industries rely on the fast-asleep folks not noticing. Educate yourself and be forearmed. 5G is already here and that is worse. Search categories (at the left of page) for articles on that. EnvirowatchRangitikei
Here is a short video of a cell tower located directly inside a residential neighborhood in McCloud, CA, near Mount Shasta. Most likely nobody in this neighborhood even considers the fact that this tower is exposing their families to potentially unhealthy levels of radio frequency radiation. Please let this be a warning to you, no matter where you live. Because cell towers like this are arriving in greater numbers in residential and commercial areas all over the world! And this is exactly why I tell my friends, clients and customers that it is essential to own a decent quality RF (radio frequency) meter so you can discern the RF exposures levels where you may choose to work and live.
Mr. Barrie Trower, a British physicist who was a microwave weapons expert and who worked for the Royal Navy and the British Secret Service, talks about the health effects of WiFi and other forms of microwave radiation.
Mr. Trower came out of retirement because he was concerned that the microwave frequencies and intensities to which children are exposed in schools are similar to those used for microwave weapons.
dailyalternative.co.uk | iknowdoyou.co.uk | Alternative News for the People
This short video shows how the residents of 555 South Barrington, Los Angeles, Ca. 90049, defeated Verizon and Douglas Emmett Real Estate and prevented them from installing a cell tower on the top of this building.
This video covers a short speech by Douglas Emmett’s Vice President promising not to install the tower.
Everyone knows these towers cause cancer, but the FCC will not let us use that as a reason to deny the installation because of lobbyist’s payments to our Congressmen.
Furthermore, the American Cancer Society will not say they cause cancer due to the donations they receive from the cell phone companies.
So the only defense that residents now have against these towers is to PUT UP A BIG STINK and let them know there will be a DEAR PRICE TO PAY if they go forward. We had planned shorting DEI stock, street protests, neighborhood activities, and they realized it was not worth the BAD PR they would get as a public company if they went forward with it.
So if you want to prevent a cell tower, here are some things that you can do:
1-A restraining order for more time
2- Picket lines on your street with signs that say “xxxxxx doesn’t care about its tenants” “NO CANCER AT XXXXX”, “HELP US FIGHT CELL TOWER CANCER AT XXXX,” “STOP VERIZON’S CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO CITY OFFICIALS,” “HONK YOUR HORN FOR NO CELL TOWER AT XXXX,” “YOUR BUILDING IS NEXT,” and whatever else you can think of…
3- Get a long list of signatures from everyone in the neighborhood and send to your officials and Congressman
4- Anything else we can think of that makes xxx realize they will have much too dear a price to pay to go through with it.
5- Call your local news channels to cover your protests
6- Do a huge SOCIAL MEDIA CAMPAIGN to let the world know that you won’t stand for this.
Flu vaccine ineffective … (research suppressed)… vaccines containing cancer causing contaminants knowingly administered to US soldiers … knowledge they had back in the 1960s! Still trust them? Shocking.
We’ve been hearing this message on chlorine a lot lately. Sadly it’s well installed in many (most?) water supplies with little hope of getting it removed. If it’s not chlorine it’s fluoride, both poisonous chemicals. It’s government (corporation) approved. (Like your Local Govt, Central Govt is also a business folks so their primary focus is profits, not as you’d thought, you, the tax/rate payer). This is why their CEs are paid ‘modest’ salaries like a quarter of a million dollars and higher. Seems at this stage your only hope is to filter or distill it out yourself at very great cost. But whatever you do, protect yourself and remove it somehow anyway. With these kinds of health risks it’s imperative. (Thanks to thecontrail for the link) EnvirowatchRangitikei
One of the most shocking components to all of these studies is that up to 2/3s of our harmful exposure to chlorine is due to inhalation of steam and skin absorption while showering
CHLORINATED SHOWERS & BATHS KILL GUT FLORA
It makes intuitive sense that drinking chlorinated water can create imbalances in your intestinal flora. We know that chlorine will kill many of the good bacteria and microbes that live symbiotically with us in our gut. These good bacteria help us digest our food, keeping us serene and healthy. But most of us fail to take this thought to it’s logical end. I know I did.
You see, I thought that if I just drank filtered water, I’d have my bases covered. It never even occurred to me that the chlorine in my shower and bath water could be just as damaging, if not more so. That’s because your skin is your largest organ, and it’s naturally gifted with the ability to absorb both nutrients and toxins.
Chlorine from drinking water can enter your body in several ways, including ingestion. You also inhale chloroform, a byproduct of chlorine, when you take a hot shower or bath. According to an article from Science News, researchers found increases in chloroform in study participants’ lungs of about 2.7ppb after a 10-minute shower. Warm water also further opens pores, so the combination of what your skin absorbs and your lungs inhale during a 10-minute shower is greater than the amount you would ingest drinking eight glasses of water from the same tap. In fact, studies at the University of Pittsburgh found less chemical exposure from ingesting chlorinated water than from showering or washing clothes in it. The study found that, on average, absorption through the skin was responsible for 64 percent of waterborne contaminants that enter the human body.
Karmen from ShowerHeadly, urges us to consider that, “not only is it dangerous to drink chlorinated water, but it’s even more dangerous to shower or bathe in it.” Even the EPA’s own scientists agree:
There is a lot of well founded concern about chlorine. When chlorine is added to our water, it combines with other natural compounds to form Trihalomethanes (chlorination byproducts), or THMs. These chlorine byproducts trigger the production of free radicals in the body, causing cell damage, and are highly carcinogenic. “Although concentrations of these carcinogens (THMs) are low, it is precisely these low levels that cancer scientists believe are responsible for the majority of human cancers in the United States“. The Environmental Defense Fund
Simply stated chlorine is a pesticide, as defined by the U.S. EPA, who’s sole purpose is to kill living organisms. When we consume water containing chlorine, it kills some part of us, destroying cells and tissue inside our body. Dr. Robert Carlson, a highly respected University of Minnesota researcher who’s work is sponsored by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, sums it up by claiming , “the chlorine problem is similar to that of air pollution”, and adds that “chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times!”
Kids love being connected to their friends, making it no surprise that recent statistics show that over 30% of all children under 13 years of age in the U.S. own their own cellular phone.
Similarly, almost 50% of all teens own a cell phone. With the knowledge that cellphone use amongst children is increasing at an alarming rate, it is even more disheartening to learn that studies are now beginning to prove some of the extremely negative effects that electromagnetic fields and radio frequency radiation are having on their bodies.
Multiple recent studies, including one from an international group of scientists, is urging governments to place stricter regulations on cellphone use, particularly due to the latest outcome of their investigations: Young people who use cell phones before the age of 20 are five times more likely to be at risk for malignant brain tumors than children who do not use mobile phones.