So any death within 28 days of a COVID diagnosis is COVID, but 2,207 deaths within 28 days of a vaccine is coincidence?

Thanks to Hilary Butler for this observation, posted at her Facebook page. She’s drawn attention to a post by Richie Allen at a link below:

I’ve certainly been noticing, like others I know, the hypocrisy of our esteemed professionals when it comes to the alarming number of deaths and injuries, anything from 15 minutes to several days after the new injection, all being classified as coincidence. Question them & repeatedly comes the statement: ‘no proof’. No proof that is that the injection caused the said adverse reaction. No there is no proof, but how (il)logical is that? Even if we did accept it, then what of the precautionary principle? Wouldn’t the MDs whose oath was ‘to do no harm’, wouldn’t they hold off jabbing until further trials were done? Nowhere do I see these professionals racing to determine the cause of the thousands of adverse reactions (that just happen to follow the said injection). How (un)professional is this? EWR

Read the article by Richie Allen at the following link:

The AstraZeneca Jab IS Killing People & It’s Being Covered Up

Photo by bruce mars on Unsplash

3 thoughts on “So any death within 28 days of a COVID diagnosis is COVID, but 2,207 deaths within 28 days of a vaccine is coincidence?”

Comments are closed.