Ft Myers, FL (3-13-20; MedicalVeritas.org)—The author of the world’s best-selling oldest-running book in the field of emerging viruses and communicable diseases, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, is battling the Pfizer drug company and its affiliates for concealing evidence proving a conspiracy involving U.S. military agents, agencies, and their media, committing civil rights abuses against religious leaders for prompting ‘vaccination hesitancy’ that is considered a risk to U.S. National Security.
Horowitz filed his lawsuit against Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccine makers, their advertisers, and distributors in early December, 2020. He claims corrupted science, genetically-engineered viruses, and DNA corrupting mRNA vaccines, risks people’s health and safety, and has damaged him personally.
Dr. Horowitz claims the defendants have committed unfair competition, deceptive trade, and religious freedom deprivations against him and his colleagues.
The Harvard-trained public health scholar is also a Levitical priest advocating for The Royal Bloodline of David. He is suing to secure his right to compete against the drug cartel using more natural products based on Bible laws and a Bible code decryption. Advocating for “religious commerce,” he pioneered a competing anti-microbial called “OxySilverTM with 528” and advertises it as a “Holy Water.” The “528Hz frequency wave” has been shown in scientific studies to positively impact mRNA function and DNA gene expression. That gives the doctor “standing” to bring the claim of “tortious interference” with religious commerce that competes directly against risky vaccines and antibiotics.
The drug syndicate’s advertisers, including Hearst, Conde Naste, and Forbes, smeared the doctor and his OxySilver product in national publications.
Consequently, Horowitz is asking the court for immediate “discovery” to prevent more “irreparable harm” by revealing the syndicate’s underlying scheme to target religious leaders advancing “vaccination hesitancy” that officials advancing the public/private alliance claim undermines bio-defenses and U.S. National Security.
“Since 2016, with the passage of the National Biodefense Strategy Act,” Dr. Horowitz explained, “when Hearst defamed me and Dr. Andrew Wakefield for our vaccination risk-awareness activism, defamatory media attacks increased.
BELOW IS A POST FOLLOWING THE DECEMBER 2020 FILING:
Dr. Leonard Horowitz Files COVID-19 Vaccine Lawsuit to Block FDA’s Approval
Ft Myers, FL (12-3-20; MedicalVeritas.org)—A world leading vaccine risk analyst, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz, has filed a COVID-19 vaccine lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida to oppose the FDA’s approval of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines until the companies, alleged to have falsely advertised safety, perform tests on the genetic impacts admittedly neglected by the companies.
“Vaccinations” or “Genetic Intoxications”?
Not actually “vaccines” in the traditional sense, but “genetic therapies” according to the companies, the court is asked to enjoin the government from approving and distributing the injections due to neglected genetic safety science and inadequate testing.
“Genetics (specified analyses) are not evaluated in this study,” the Pfizer Protocol admitted. The same is true for the Moderna vaccine.
Dr. Horowitz’s 84-page lawsuit holds Pfizer and Moderna vaccine advertisers and distributors accountable for false advertising of the vaccines’ safety under Florida’s unfair and deceptive trade act and whistleblower law. Eight claims are brought by the whistleblowing doctor and litigator who has asked the court for a number of “remedies” besides the injunction.
One of Horowitz’s remedies would require Defendants to supplement their COVID-19 vaccine trials to assess the risks of genetic alterations to human DNA and viral genes.
“The injunction should require Defendants to . . . assess the risks of genetic ‘reassortments’ of latent DNA and RNA tumor viruses in medically or immune compromised people,” the lawsuit pleads.
“The injunction should require the federal government to suspend its acquisition of the Defendants’ COVID-19 vaccines until such a time as the aforementioned safety concerns are studied and resolved by supplemental trials, the results of which are candidly published,” the doctor added.
False Safety Advertising Might Worsen Outcomes
Dr. Horowitz’s complaint raises criminal concerns beyond consumer fraud by Pfizer, Moderna, their advertisers and distributors at Hearst Corp and Henry Schein, Inc. There is a broader financial and media enterprise involved.
The complaint reminds the court of Pfizer’s criminal fine of $2.3 billion—the largest health care fraud settlement in history for complicity in causing the opioid crisis.
Advertisements filed with the court proclaim safety of the mRNA vaccines without “reasonable justification.” This evidences “deceptive trade” according to the complaint.
The whistleblower argues that the Defendants “omitted material facts in advertisements implying safety had been ‘observed’ in these mRNA genetic studies whereas the official protocol stated: ‘No testing of the participant’s DNA will be performed’ (p. 52).”
“This neglect happened even though the virus’s ‘spike protein’ attachment mechanism was genetically reconfigured in the Pfizer and Moderna labs.
The alleged neglect of genetic safety studies occurred even though the therapeutic impact of the mRNA targets DNA production of spike protein antigens to induce antibody production demonstrating “DNA modulation and trickery,” the lawsuit explains.
Horowitz expressed most concern that, “Officials concealed the risk of Pfizer and Moderna’s genetic sequences recombining with other viruses in humans or the environment, increasing the risk and likelihood of additional ‘novel’ outbreaks and disastrous pandemics.”