The cover-up continues – BBC Wrong on Fukushima, Again

The big lie continues – “Fukushima’s all good – nothing to worry about – carry on as usual”. This is why they’ve made it illegal in Japan to discuss your post quake health problems related to radiation?  Watch & listen.

Published on Mar 11, 2016

Response to: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35…
Expanded upon here: http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-35…

Dose-rate conversion:
http://www.translatorscafe.com/cafe/E…
” 2.8 microsievert/hour = 24.5448 millisievert/year ”

Study cited @ 1:40 re regional natural background dose rate of 0.05 uSv/y
Malins et al (2016). Evaluation of ambient dose equivalent rates influenced by vertical and horizontal distribution of radioactive cesium in soil in Fukushima Prefecture. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 151 (2016) 38e49 http://pubmed.gov/26408835

Study cited @ 3:58
Mozdarani et al (2002). Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes of individuals with chronic exposure to gamma radiation. Arch Irn Med, 5(1): 32-36. http://www.ams.ac.ir/AIM/NEWPUB/13/16…

Study cited @ 4:24
Zakeri & Assaei (2004). Cytogenetic monitoring of personnel working in angiocardiography laboratories in Iran hospitals. Mutat Res. 2004 Aug 8;562(1-2):1-9. http://pubmed.gov/15279825

Study cited @ 4:48
Kendall et al (2013). A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006. Leukemia. 27(1): 3–9. http://pubmed.gov/22766784

Study cited @ 5:08
Spycher et al (2015). Background ionizing radiation and the risk of childhood cancer: a census-based nationwide cohort study. Environ Health Perspect, 123(6), 622-8. http://pubmed.com/25707026 Spycher’s graphs are in nSv/h, which is nanosieverts per hour and which I converted for this video to microsieverts per hour by the rule: 100 nSv = 0.1 µSv.

@ 8:04, BBC concedes that 122 Chernobyl deaths estimate is misleading
http://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/comp-…
BBC: “Two viewers (one of them writing on behalf of 55 co-signatories, most of them academics from a variety of disciplines) complained that the item seriously understated the likely death toll (in relation to both Chernobyl and Fukushima) and, by ignoring scientific opinion which favoured higher estimates.”

Estimate of Chernobyl deaths @ 8:47 from
European Environmental Agency (2013). Late lessons from early warnings: science, precaution, innovation. EEA Report 1/2013, Chap 18, p. 435, European Environmental Agency, Copenhagen. http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications…


For further info read our previous articles on Fukushima. There is definitely far more than meets the eye with this disaster that is affecting the entire planet’s food, air & water supply. You are not being told the truth on this. Think Kiwis are exempt? The following readings were taken in 2013. Your government is never going to tell you about this. Time to research and keep yourself informed – not via mainstream media.

isotoperadiationpictontochristchurchsm
Readings taken in 2013. 100CPM is Alert Level: [courtesy of thecontrail.com]

EnvirowatchRangitikei

Advertisements

Your comments are welcomed

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s